联想 ThinkPad P14s G4 AMD 评测:快速、便携、直观
ThinkPad P14s 的吸引力不仅限于商务客户。虽然它的智能卡插槽和 Ryzen Pro 处理器的远程维护选项使其几乎注定成为工作机队电脑,但该设备对高运算能力的充分关注,甚至对图形要求苛刻的任务也不例外,其实用的超长电池续航时间和坚固的构造将吸引众多笔记本电脑用户。
看看可能的竞争对手 ThinkPad T14s G4和惠普 EliteBook 845 G10。 惠普 EliteBook 845 G10和惠普 EliteBook 845 G10,后者也将赌注押在了强大的 iGPU AMD Radeon 780M 的效率上。了解 ThinkPad P14s 的性能优劣,以及与英特尔老旧的 iGPU Intel Iris 相比差距有多大。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.8 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.3 kg | 21.8 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
90.5 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
90.4 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.9 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | HP ZBook Power 15 G10 R7 PRO 7840HS, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 22.9 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
86.2 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | HP ProBook 450 G10 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 30.23 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 平淡但坚固
ThinkPad P14s 的外观并不出众。深灰色哑光表面和 i 上的亮点将其定位为 ThinkPad。除此之外,它给人的主要印象是坚固耐用、质量上乘。
显示屏只会有轻微翘曲,底座则完全不会。无论从哪个角度打开,铰链都非常紧密;合上时,盖子与底座齐平,紧紧贴合。所有部件看起来都能长期承受日常压力。
机身相当厚,尤其是当你知道它不包含专用 GPU,内存和 Wi-Fi 模块都是焊接上去的。除此之外,ThinkPad P14s 结构紧凑、重量轻,仅重 1.3 千克。考虑到该设备的坚固性,这一点令人印象深刻。三星 三星Galaxy Book3 Pro可能没有那么坚固,但它说明了 14 英寸笔记本也可以如此轻薄。
连接性 - 带有出色摄像头的 ThinkPad P14s
重要的东西都在这里:两侧的 USB-A 端口、两个 USB-C 端口、两个视频输出和一个 LAN 端口。网络接口对于 14 英寸笔记本电脑来说并不明显,而 USB4 端口则确保了扩展坞的方便使用。
不过,与定位相似的英特尔笔记本电脑不同,我们的 ThinkPad 只有一个快速 USB-C 端口,通常用于连接扩展坞或交流适配器。第二个 USB-C 端口还支持充电和视频输出。高达 40 Gbit/s 的高速传输速率只能通过一个端口实现。我们还希望 USB-A 端口的传输速率能达到 10 Gbit/s,而不是只有 5 Gbit/s(如今许多外置固态硬盘都能轻松达到这一速度)。
交流
在我们的测试中,高通公司的 Wi-Fi 模块在发送数据时没有达到最佳数据吞吐量。但在接收数据时,该模块达到了预期水平。如果距离足够短,Wi-Fi 6 的无线传输速率超过 1500 Mbit/s,明显优于 LAN 端口。
一切都为 5G/LTE 模块做好了准备,SIM 卡插槽和天线电缆都已就位。
网络摄像头
ThinkPad P14s 的网络摄像头配备齐全。它具有高分辨率,可在视频会议等过程中识别和传输细节。手动快门可让用户在不使用时可靠地关闭镜头。其他功能还包括用于人脸识别的红外传感器和双阵列麦克风。
色彩偏差和图像噪点降低了整体图像质量,但幸运的是,这在视频通话中几乎不起作用。另一方面,黑暗场景中的良好照明、细节水平和功能卓越的麦克风确实发挥了自己的作用。不同方向和距离的声音都能以一致的音量清晰地记录下来。
安全
与通常的工作站笔记本电脑一样,它集成了所有重要的安全功能。从指纹扫描仪、面部识别到智能卡读卡器和 Kensington 锁,一切都考虑到了。
配件
除了 65 瓦 USB-C 电源装置外,没有其他配件。值得一提的是,包装没有使用多余的塑料,所有填充物都是用回收纸板制成。
由于采用了 USB4 技术,大多数 USB-C 或 Thunderbolt 扩展坞都能完全兼容。
维护
底座上的螺丝很容易触及,使用标准工具即可拧松。我们建议使用起重工具拆卸底板,但这并非必要。塑料夹也无需工具即可打开,之后同样可以轻松合上。
拆下底板后,用户就可以接触到电池、M.2 固态硬盘和可选的 WWAN 卡。内存和 WLAN 模块是焊接上去的,无法扩展。如果能更换或扩展内存就更好了。这是工作站笔记本电脑,尤其是不太薄的笔记本电脑应该提供的功能。
保修
联想通过自己的网上商店提供一年的 "高级支持"。这包括下一个工作日的现场维修,并可付费延长至 3 年。
输入设备 - 良好但不完美
键盘达到了预期的高标准。略微粗糙的弧形按键可实现精确快速的键入。均匀的背光确保了任何时候的最佳可读性。
1.5 毫米的键程(我们的测量值)对于快速键入者来说可能太短,键盘框架的轻微弯曲也不理想。但请不要误解我们的意思:对于笔记本电脑来说,键盘是非常好的,只是其微小的弱点不一定符合你对 ThinkPad 的期望。
触摸板和追踪点几乎没有弱点。它们的输入精度令人印象深刻,执行压力与按键的配合也非常默契。
显示屏 - 几乎总是正确的选择
该显示屏完全适合典型的工作站笔记本电脑任务。它的分辨率为 1920 x 1200 像素,宽高比为 16:10。
IPS 面板色彩显示准确,可视角度稳定,尤其是当一群人从不同角度观察 ThinkPad P14s 的屏幕时,这一特性不容小觑。
亚光表面和略高于平均水平的亮度确保了笔记本电脑在户外也能轻松使用。黑色值不错,高对比度进一步提高了屏幕的可读性。我们只注意到极少的背光出血现象,主要集中在右下角。
帧频只有 60 Hz,响应速度低于平均水平,但这并不重要,因为大多数用户并不需要完美显示快速移动的内容。
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 414 cd/m²
Contrast: 1592:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE Lenovo MNE007JA1-1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES CMN1435, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 MNE007JA1-1, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | HP ZBook Power 15 G10 BOE0B6A, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 LP140WU1-SPB2, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | HP ProBook 450 G10 LG Philips LP156WFC-SPMD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Samsung ATNA40CU02-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -3% | -2% | -5% | -44% | 26% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 69.4 | 70.6 2% | 67.1 -3% | 68.2 -2% | 65.9 -5% | 38.4 -45% | 99.7 44% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 97.8 -2% | 95.6 -4% | 94.3 -6% | 57.3 -43% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.4 | 72.4 1% | 69.4 -3% | 70.5 -1% | 68.2 -4% | 39.7 -44% | 95.7 34% |
Response Times | -7% | 17% | 69% | 23% | 24% | 100% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.9 ? | 59.7 ? -30% | 38.4 ? 16% | 13 ? 72% | 33.5 ? 27% | 35.5 ? 23% | 0.5 ? 99% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30.7 ? | 25.5 ? 17% | 25.1 ? 18% | 10.4 ? 66% | 24.9 ? 19% | 23 ? 25% | 0.1 ? 100% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | ||||||
Screen | -5% | 7% | -40% | -6% | -148% | 249% | |
Brightness middle | 414 | 409 -1% | 398 -4% | 313.8 -24% | 448 8% | 285 -31% | 409 -1% |
Brightness | 392 | 391 0% | 379 -3% | 302 -23% | 422 8% | 266 -32% | 410 5% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 92 3% | 90 1% | 83 -7% | 85 -4% | 88 -1% | 99 11% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.27 -4% | 0.23 12% | 0.29 -12% | 0.23 12% | 0.26 -0% | 0.01 96% |
Contrast | 1592 | 1515 -5% | 1730 9% | 1082 -32% | 1948 22% | 1096 -31% | 40900 2469% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 2.3 -21% | 1.3 32% | 3.27 -72% | 2.5 -32% | 6.3 -232% | 2.36 -24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.6 | 4.4 -22% | 3.1 14% | 7.81 -117% | 3.7 -3% | 18.3 -408% | 4.07 -13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 0.9 -13% | 1.2 -50% | 0.56 30% | 1.3 -63% | 5.2 -550% | 3.16 -295% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 2.4 17% | 1.4 52% | 5.9 -103% | 2.9 -0% | 4.3 -48% | 3.06 -6% |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.06 107% | 2.26 97% | 2.18 101% | 2.03 108% | 2.32 95% | 2.49 88% |
CCT | 6227 104% | 6293 103% | 6448 101% | 6323 103% | 6840 95% | 6374 102% | 6882 94% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-4% | 7% /
6% | 9% /
-16% | 4% /
-2% | -56% /
-101% | 125% /
180% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏覆盖了整个 sRGB 色彩空间,可以很好地显示多媒体内容。专业图像处理需要更大的色彩空间,但这同样与大多数 ThinkPad P14s 用户无关。
开箱后色彩显示良好。我们的测量结果表明,色彩空间偏差刚刚超过可感知的范围。这主要影响到几种灰色色调,即使在这种情况下也几乎不值得注意。我们可以通过校准面板来进一步改善色彩显示效果,不过这对大多数用户来说并无必要。即使是经过训练的眼睛,也无法看出校准与否在色彩显示上的明显差异。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.6 ms rise | |
↘ 14.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
45.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.9 ms rise | |
↘ 24 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在户外使用 ThinkPad P14s 时,高最大亮度和良好的对比度都能得到很好的发挥。虽然看到天空反射到屏幕上可能会令人讨厌,但只要光线不直接落在显示屏上,就没有什么能阻止你在户外工作。
正如 IPS 面板所预期的那样,即使在倾斜视角下,色彩和亮度也能保持稳定。
性能--Ryzen 7 功耗与效率兼得
ThinkPad P14s G4 配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 7840U,其中包括集成 GPU AMD Radeon 780M.该 CPU 的特点是运算能力强,图形性能与小型专用显卡相当,而且 Pro 系列支持远程维护。另一种配置可使用稍弱的 AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7540U和 Radeon 740M.
内存有多种选择,从 16、32 到 64 GB 的 6400 MHz DDR5 内存不等。由于模块是焊接上去的,如果有疑问,我们建议选择更宽松的选项。
测试条件
性能模式通过 Windows 进行管理。您可以在设置的能源选项卡中选择 "最佳性能"、"平衡 "和 "节能 "模式。联想商用贵族软件的标准设置为最高性能。总体而言,CPU 的功耗限制变化很小。
这意味着笔记本在平衡模式下的性能相当高。虽然速度上的损失是可以测量的,但用户在日常使用中几乎感觉不到差异。风扇在满负荷运转时仍能听到声音,尽管声音较小。在节能模式下,尽管性能仍然相当高,但情况会更加轻松。即使在该模式下进行压力测试,风扇也不会发出明显的声响。
当断开外部电源时,笔记本会自动切换到平衡模式,但用户可以轻松地将性能模式切换回自己喜欢的设置。我们的测试和基准测试均在最佳性能模式下进行。
PL2 | PL1 | |
---|---|---|
最佳性能 | 40 W | 32 W |
平衡型 | 36 W | 32 W |
节能 | 30 W | 26 W |
处理器
......(英文 AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 7840U是一款功能强大的 CPU,同时也是一款注重效率的 CPU。由于拥有 8 个内核和 16 个威胁,它能为复杂应用和多任务处理提供足够的计算能力,同时通过 28 W 的 TDP 限制了能源和冷却需求。
该产品 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U具有相同的基本构造和性能,但缺少 Pro 系列的附加安全芯片。该芯片支持众多远程功能,包括集中更新和管理功能。
我们的 CPU 可轻松击败英特尔第 13 代移动 CPU。虽然英特尔酷睿 i7-13700H 在纸面上拥有更好的功能,并实现了与我们测试设备类似的性能,但它无法提供相同的效率,根据笔记本电脑型号的不同,它比 ThinkPad P14s 多消耗 20% 到 30% 的电力。
ThinkPad P14s 显然实现了它在性能和效率方面的承诺。
您可以在我们的 CPU 基准测试列表。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Workstation | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Workstation (11026 - 27338, n=29, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (10576 - 15142, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average of class Workstation (1469 - 2178, n=29, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (1703 - 1747, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Workstation (2990 - 10276, n=30, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (4210 - 5981, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average of class Workstation (564 - 827, n=30, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (652 - 684, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Workstation (1863 - 4363, n=29, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (1590 - 2418, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average of class Workstation (166.2 - 301, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (247 - 273, n=5) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (217 - 380, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Average of class Workstation (121 - 295, n=29, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Workstation (47244 - 109204, n=29, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (34490 - 62320, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Average of class Workstation (4981 - 6960, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (5633 - 5988, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Workstation (8050 - 19316, n=29, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (9663 - 10920, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average of class Workstation (1474 - 2095, n=29, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (1740 - 1895, n=5) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Average of class Workstation (12.7 - 27.1, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (13.6 - 17.8, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (45.8 - 52, n=5) | |
Average of class Workstation (36.5 - 95.2, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (0.4658 - 0.4807, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Average of class Workstation (0.3825 - 0.54, n=29, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | |
Average of class Workstation | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (17604 - 23889, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Workstation (10658 - 25776, n=29, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Average of class Workstation (56664 - 113270, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (77578 - 100087, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (3611 - 4394, n=5) | |
Average of class Workstation (2598 - 5598, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Average of class Workstation (84022 - 144411, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (95020 - 110151, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (12250 - 14151, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Workstation (7906 - 14742, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (41143 - 53280, n=5) | |
Average of class Workstation (27301 - 58181, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (66300 - 142329, n=5) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Average of class Workstation (45568 - 128243, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Workstation (713 - 1691, n=29, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (777 - 1004, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (9494 - 12540, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Workstation (5580 - 13800, n=29, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Workstation (18157 - 51686, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (33564 - 38442, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
PCMark 10 的测试结果非常出色,彰显了 ThinkPad P14s G4 的卓越性能。它可以轻松击败申克 Vision 14 2023,后者的集成 GPU 在媒体创建方面跟不上。
在平衡模式下使用电池运行时,性能会降低 20%。但即便如此,运行、安装或卸载程序时的延迟也几乎看不出来。这款工作站笔记本电脑在任何时候都能提供不错的性能。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Average of class Workstation (5953 - 8587, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (6541 - 7012, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Workstation (9151 - 12197, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (10055 - 10934, n=5) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (8921 - 9933, n=5) | |
Average of class Workstation (7846 - 10820, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Average of class Workstation (7417 - 15093, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (7806 - 8874, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Workstation (1154 - 2037, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1533 - 1669, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Workstation (1188 - 1902, n=27, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1461 - 1624, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Workstation (1180 - 2311, n=27, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1697 - 1824, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Workstation (990 - 1805, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1049 - 1499, n=5) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Average of class Workstation (218 - 415, n=30, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (259 - 317, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Workstation (166.7 - 338, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (234 - 245, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (523 - 571, n=5) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average of class Workstation (447 - 612, n=30, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6665 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (66487 - 67856, n=5) | |
Average of class Workstation (30324 - 95718, n=29, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Workstation (30787 - 86584, n=29, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (47725 - 50543, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (89477 - 94965, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Workstation (32728 - 93871, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (128.6 - 138.9, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Average of class Workstation (83.4 - 140.8, n=29, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 测试的结果并不令人信服。用户在尝试实时处理音频和视频时可能会遇到一些困难。这主要是由于 DirectX 驱动程序造成的,未来的更新可能会改善这一问题。
驱动程序配置的改变总能带来重大变化。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
SK Hynix 固态硬盘牢固地粘附在铜制散热器上,即使在连续负载的情况下也能提供稳定的高性能。不过,当固态硬盘需要写入大量数据或处理并行访问时,性能就会下降。
这对程序的正常使用几乎没有影响,即使是要求苛刻的程序。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形
集成图形处理器 AMD Radeon 780M不能创造奇迹,但它确实令人印象深刻地说明了 iGPU 如何轻松达到 英伟达GeForce RTX 2050 - 的水平,而功耗只是其一小部分。
在工作站领域,图形性能与专业应用和 CAD/CAM 软件尤其相关。SPECviewperf 可以很好地说明 GPU 对这些应用的适用性--集成图形处理器表现出色,接近专用 GPU,如 RTX A1000等专用 GPU 相差无几。后者的性能要比前者高出 50%,但付出的努力却要大得多。Radeon 780M 的性能也比其前代产品 Radeon 680M 高出 30%。 Radeon 680M.
比较 英特尔 Iris Xe 图形 96EUs与我们的 Radeon 780M 相比,表现尤为突出:它的 三星Galaxy Book3 Pro在所有 3DMark 测试中的得分仅为 Radeon 780M 的一半。
更多数据、测试和评估可在我们的 GPU 基准测试年龄。
3DMark 11 Performance | 11964 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35597 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7604 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3186 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
良好的合成基准测试结果在玩当前游戏,特别是一些较老的游戏时得到了体现。许多游戏都可以在中高设置和全高清分辨率下轻松运行。
不过,在玩《星际争霸》等非常复杂的游戏时,GPU 的性能确实达到了极限,即使在最低设置下,ThinkPad 也无法显示 30 FPS。不过,尽管帧率较低,游戏仍然能流畅运行。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Workstation (23.3 - 156.5, n=23, last 2 years) | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
HP ZBook Power 15 G10 | |
Average of class Workstation (18.3 - 126.7, n=26, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 450 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
Starfield | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (19 - 21.3, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average of class Workstation (5.04 - 19, n=3, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (15 - 19.1, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average of class Workstation (15 - 16, n=2, last 2 years) |
我们的Witcher 3 连续循环显示,性能没有突然的跳跃或自发的下降。轻微的下降与游戏中的昼夜节奏有关。这表明,即使在长期负载的情况下,设备的最高性能也能保持稳定。
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 146.9 | 134.3 | 64.2 | 26.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 137 | 91 | 46 | 29 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 115.2 | 90.4 | 79.9 | 69.1 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 74 | 36.2 | 27.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 45.8 | 32.8 | 28 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 73 | 44 | 41 | 39 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 158.5 | 66.4 | 56.9 | 48.4 |
F1 23 (2023) | 79.3 | 71.2 | 50 | 11.6 |
Starfield (2023) | 26 | 22 | 19 | 16 |
排放 - 安静、温暖的 ThinkPad P14s
噪音排放
联想笔记本在日常使用中几乎完全保持静音。当需要更高的性能时,例如在冗长的安装过程或大量的渲染过程中,风扇会慢慢加速。由此产生的风扇噪音最好用清晰可闻的杂音来形容。
用户很少会受到风扇的干扰,因为只有在特殊情况下,风扇才会发出这样的噪音,负载下的平均值也证实了这一点。虽然 31 dB(A) 是可以听到的,但几乎不会或完全不会造成干扰。我们不久前测试过的三星 Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 的噪音大约是它的两倍,约为 45 dB(A),完全令人讨厌,而且会妨碍你的工作流程。那些不愿意忍受嘈杂风扇的人应该给联想 ThinkPad T14 G4 一个机会。我们测试的这款机型虽然采用了相同的 AMD 7840U 芯片,但噪音明显低于 P14s G4。需要注意的是?在 CPU 性能测试中,P14s G4 落后于 T14 G4。这是因为后者的 CPU 功耗限制较高。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 22.4 / 22.4 / 22.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 31.3 / 39.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.4 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X162N | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU | HP ZBook Power 15 G10 NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, R7 PRO 7840HS, WDC PC SN810 2TB | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP ProBook 450 G10 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1355U, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 7% | 3% | -7% | -1% | -6% | -24% | |
off / environment * | 22.4 | 22.9 -2% | 23.1 -3% | 24.2 -8% | 22.9 -2% | 23.5 -5% | 25.2 -13% |
Idle Minimum * | 22.4 | 22.9 -2% | 23.1 -3% | 24.4 -9% | 22.9 -2% | 23.5 -5% | 25.2 -13% |
Idle Average * | 22.4 | 22.9 -2% | 23.1 -3% | 24.4 -9% | 22.9 -2% | 23.5 -5% | 25.2 -13% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.4 | 22.9 -2% | 23.1 -3% | 24.4 -9% | 22.9 -2% | 23.5 -5% | 32 -43% |
Load Average * | 31.3 | 24.3 22% | 26.5 15% | 27.4 12% | 30.8 2% | 38 -21% | 45.25 -45% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.5 | 32.4 18% | 35.7 10% | 43.3 -10% | 39.4 -0% | 38.2 3% | |
Load Maximum * | 39.2 | 33.9 14% | 35.78 9% | 46.8 -19% | 39.5 -1% | 41.4 -6% | 45.3 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
低噪音对温度的发展有不利影响。底座底部几乎总是明显发热,最高温度达到 48 °C。尽管同类设备的温度相差无几,但这一温度却相当可观。毕竟,强大的 CPU 所产生的热量总得有个去处。
在办公桌前工作时,表面温度应该不是大问题,不过制造商本可以在降低键盘温度方面多下功夫,因为键盘温度有时也会超过 40 °C。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | HP ZBook Power 15 G10 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M | HP ProBook 450 G10 Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -4% | 1% | -1% | 3% | 2% | -11% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.1 | 45.4 -10% | 43.5 -6% | 42.4 -3% | 42.7 -4% | 39.9 3% | 43.9 -7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48.2 | 50.6 -5% | 47.4 2% | 47.8 1% | 43.1 11% | 43 11% | 50.7 -5% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.5 | 26.8 -1% | 24.9 6% | 26.8 -1% | 25.7 3% | 26.4 -0% | 30.8 -16% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.9 | 26.8 -0% | 26 3% | 27.2 -1% | 26.4 2% | 29 -8% | 31.6 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
正如所承诺的那样,CPU 的最大功耗在大约 30 秒内保持在 40 W。测量温度通常保持在 70 °C以下,这表明热量传输非常有效。
同时,压力测试期间的平均容量几乎始终保持在 100%。GPU 也可以同时使用最大容量。为了测量这一点,我们在 10 分钟后激活了 FurMark,并在完成压力测试前再次关闭了它。
ThinkPad P14s 没有出现任何节流或发热过多的迹象。换句话说,在连续使用时没有任何障碍。
发言人
扬声器的音质不错,但并不好。低音和中低音几乎听不到,驱动器也缺乏动力。
对于视频通话、偶尔的视频流和播放背景音乐来说,音质已经足够好了。音质均衡,长期使用依然悦耳动听。只有在非常高的频率下才能听到失真,大多数笔记本扬声器都是如此。
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 适合长途旅行的高效 ThinkPad
耗电量
工作站笔记本电脑空闲时的功耗很低,有时不到 3 瓦。但在满负荷运行时,功耗可增加到 60 W。
对于移动设备来说,这是一种理想状态。在休息时间、浏览网页或阅读文档时,只需要很少的能量,但当系统处于负载状态时,就有 60 瓦的可用功率,65 瓦的电源也能随时提供。
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.8 Watt |
Idle | 2.9 / 5.1 / 5.6 Watt |
Load |
51.2 / 60.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X162N, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP ProBook 450 G10 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Average AMD Radeon 780M | Average of class Workstation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 3% | -30% | 10% | -30% | 2% | -61% | -161% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.9 | 3.3 -14% | 4.2 -45% | 3.2 -10% | 4.6 -59% | 2.6 10% | 6.2 ? -114% | 8.2 ? -183% |
Idle Average * | 5.1 | 5.6 -10% | 4.7 8% | 5.1 -0% | 7.3 -43% | 5 2% | 8.44 ? -65% | 12.6 ? -147% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.6 | 6.1 -9% | 11.4 -104% | 5.4 4% | 8.4 -50% | 5.6 -0% | 10.8 ? -93% | 18.2 ? -225% |
Load Average * | 51.2 | 40.1 22% | 61.5 -20% | 39.1 24% | 57.3 -12% | 49.7 3% | 56.3 ? -10% | 93.2 ? -82% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.9 | 41.4 17% | 55.1 -10% | 39.8 20% | 49.3 1% | 50.6 -1% | ||
Load Maximum * | 60.2 | 51.8 14% | 64 -6% | 46.6 23% | 69.7 -16% | 61.1 -1% | 75.3 ? -25% | 160.7 ? -167% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with an external display
电池寿命
在要求不高的任务中,笔记本的耗电量非常低,这一点在电池续航时间上也得到了体现。在我们的网页浏览测试中,这款笔记本电脑的续航时间超过 11 小时,比一般设备的续航时间更长。不过,提高屏幕亮度确实会对电池寿命产生重大影响。不过,我们在亮度接近 70% 时达到了最佳值,这在桌前工作时通常已经足够。
在我们的视频测试中,电池续航时间同样出色,达到了近 10 小时。这是一个令人满意的结果,尤其是考虑到电池容量并不大,只有 52 瓦时。
由于这款工作站笔记本即使在使用电池的情况下也能提供大量电能,因此在负载情况下,电池续航时间仅为不到 1 小时。
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, 52 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, 52.5 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 63 Wh | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 51 Wh | HP ProBook 450 G10 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 51.3 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G3 AMD 21J6S05000 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, 52.5 Wh | Average of class Workstation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 33% | 23% | 24% | 56% | 10% | 5% | |
H.264 | 592 | 712 20% | 760 28% | 685 16% | 718 21% | 671 ? 13% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 685 | 729 6% | 528 -23% | 779 14% | 559 -18% | 730 7% | 509 ? -26% |
Load | 63 | 100 59% | 109 73% | 81 29% | 170 170% | 64 2% | 80.3 ? 27% |
Reader / Idle | 1257 | 1083 | 927 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - P14s 是实用主义者的理想之选
只要图形处理不是主要任务,联想 ThinkPad P14s G4 AMD 便能为便携式工作站提供出色的特性。其 CPU 和 GPU 性能令人印象深刻。Radeon 780M 可以轻松取代小型专用 GPU。此外,该设备效率很高,电池可持续一整天。
包括人脸识别在内的无数安全功能可确保您的数据安全。坚固的结构和远程维护选项进一步增强了保护。
虽然端口不尽人意,但电源充足、iGPU 功能强大、电池续航时间超长:客观地说,ThinkPad P14s 是一个非常不错的选择。
在连接性方面还有改进的余地。强大的网络摄像头、所有主接口和 USB4 使该设备具有多功能性,除了已有的 LAN 端口外,还可以选择添加 5G/LTE 接口。除了两个过时的 USB 3.0 接口外,只有一个真正快速的 USB 接口,这稍稍影响了它给人的好印象。同类英特尔笔记本电脑可提供的功能更多。工作站笔记本电脑确实应该允许用户更换和/或扩展内存模块。
尽管如此,P14s G4 AMD 仍是一款装备精良的设备,它没有花哨的额外配置,也没有时尚的外观,但价格实惠。如果用户希望获得更大的便携性,可以考虑配置类似的 ThinkPad T14 G4是一个不错的选择。惠普 惠普 ZBook Power G10则带来了更强大的性能,尤其是在图形处理方面。
价格和供应情况
联想 ThinkPad P14s G4 有多种配置可供选择,包括我们配备 Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 的测试机。
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE
- 01/21/2024 v7 (old)
Mario Petzold
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.