华硕 Vivobook S 14 OLED 评测：得益于月亮湖技术，价格实惠、更安静、更持久
英特尔 Lunar Lake 还是 AMD Zen 5？
除了 AMD 机型，华硕现在还推出了配备最新英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器的小巧 Vivobook S 14 OLED。由于包括 60 Hz FHD OLED 面板在内的其他组件在这两款机型中都是通用的，因此我们在评测中将重点关注这两款机型的性能和风扇表现。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论Vivobook S 14 采用月亮湖技术，整体性能更胜一筹
小巧的华硕 Vivobook S 14 OLED 在某些方面确实得益于英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器。虽然与 AMD 版本相比，多核性能大幅下降，但整体性能仍然完全能够满足大多数日常任务的需要。
最大的优势是功耗更低，这一点在更安静的风扇上尤为明显，只有当 CPU 和 GPU 处于最大负载时，风扇才会发出响声。除此之外，英特尔机型始终比 AMD 机型安静。
除了 Lunar Lake 升级，Vivobook S 14 OLED 英特尔版还带来了额外的功能，如 Thunderbolt 4、微软的扩展人工智能功能（Copilot+）和现代的 Wi-Fi 7 模块。
接口丰富，输入设备舒适，电池运行时间再次得到提升。在 150 尼特的 Wi-Fi 测试中，它的续航时间为 17 小时，而在全亮度下则略低于 11 小时，小巧的 Vivobook S 14 OLED 表现出色，尽管这也是低屏幕分辨率带来的好处。
这就引出了对 Vivobook 的批评，因为基本版本使用的是分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 的 OLED 面板。主观上看，画面非常出色和生动，而且还提供了准确的色彩配置文件。
不过，面板的反射率也很高（没有触摸屏），刷新率也仅限于 60 赫兹。此外还存在 PWM 闪烁现象，但至少华硕提供了软件解决方案来缓解这一问题。
另一个饱受诟病的问题是内存不可扩展，但这是英特尔的问题，因为内存直接集成到了 Lunar Lake 套件中。
尽管新款 Vivobook S 14 OLED 英特尔版的零售价为 1099 欧元或 1000 美元，但它还是令人信服的。它不仅比 AMD 版本便宜 300 欧元，而且由于排放量更低，作为日常便携式伴侣，它的整体性能也更胜一筹。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Vivobook S 14 OLED 测试设备配备 Core Ultra 5 226V、16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘，可直接从华硕订购，价格为 1,099 欧元。.配备 Core Ultra 7 258V、32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD 的机型目前在亚马逊有售，售价为 999.99 美元。
- $899.49ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 16GB, 1TB SSD, Neutral Black, S5406MA-AS96, Intel Evo Edition
- $40.9990W USB-C Charger adp-90rb e for Asus Vivobook S 14 14X 16X OLED s5406m s5406s s5406 k3502z k3402x tp3402z m3502r s5402s s5602z m5602s Asus Zenbook 14X ux3404V ux5400z q410v q420v a21-090p2a Adapter
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.9%  | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $999.99 ASUS Vivobook S 14 Copilot+ ... 2. $899.49 ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED Lapt... 3. $40.99 90W USB-C Charger adp-90rb e... List Price: 1099€ | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
2. 84.9%  | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,199.99 List Price: 1400 EUR | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
3. 83.5%  | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1200 EUR | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
4. 83.9%  | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 AMD Ryzen 5 7540U ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $573.99 List Price: 800 EUR | 1.4 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
5. 85.5%  | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $30.95 celicious Matte Anti-Glare S... 2. $30.95 celicious Silk Mild Anti-Gla... 3. $15.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... List Price: 870€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS |
6. 85.1%  | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... 2. $15.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... 3. $18.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Protector Film... List Price: 1275€ | 1.4 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS |
7. 83.5%  | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1399€ | 1.3 kg | 17.08 mm | 14.20" 2880x1920 244 PPI OLED |
我们已经测试过 Vivobook S 14 OLED采用了 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370处理器的 Vivobook S 14 OLED。现在，华硕又推出了一款搭载英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器的机型。
我们的配置是基本型号，零售价为 1099 欧元，可获得 酷睿至尊 5 226V16GB内存、512GB固态硬盘和60赫兹全高清OLED面板。配备 酷睿至尊 7 258V、32 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘和 120 Hz 3K OLED 面板的配置的建议零售价为 1,499 欧元。这两款机型目前供货有限。
规格
与 AMD 变体的区别
Lunar Lake Vivobook S 14 OLED 的机身与已测试过的 AMD 机型并无不同。 已经测试过的 AMD 型号.英特尔版本有黑色和雾蓝两种颜色可供选择，具体取决于处理器选项。
机箱的质量完全可以接受，键盘的行程为 1.7 毫米，非常舒适。与 AMD 机型一样，由于内存是英特尔芯片的一部分，因此无法升级。不过，M.2 2280 固态硬盘可以轻松更换。
英特尔 Vivobook 的两个 USB-C 端口支持 Thunderbolt 4，Wi-Fi 模块（英特尔 BE201）也支持 Wi-Fi 7。作为 Copilot+ PC，Vivobook 现在支持高级 AI 功能，如实时字幕和 1080p 网络摄像头的 Windows Studio 特效，不过网络摄像头本身的质量仍然一般。
现在，AMD 版本也应该已经获得了 Copilot+ 功能所需的软件更新。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Networking | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
可持续性
包装主要由纸板和可回收材料组成。制造商没有提供更多关于设备本身使用可回收材料或生产过程中二氧化碳排放量的详细信息。
显示屏60 赫兹全高清 OLED
华硕还为基于英特尔的 Vivobook S 14 配备了著名的三星 OLED 面板（ATNA40CT02-0），分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 像素，宽高比为 16:10。
有关该显示屏的详细信息，请参阅我们的 AMD 版的评测中。的评测中，因此我们在这里只集中介绍最重要的信息。
OLED 屏幕提供足够清晰的图像，色彩鲜艳，对比度高。响应时间很快，但 OLED 的刷新率被限制在 60 Hz，这在日常使用中很明显。
第二个主要问题是虽然没有触摸屏，但表面反射率很高。SDR 亮度略低于 400 cd/m²，在 HDR 模式下最高可达 600 cd/m²。
华硕提供了各种色彩配置文件，包括非常精确的 Display P3 和 sRGB 色彩空间配置文件，这些配置文件都已完全覆盖。
在 240 Hz 时会出现 PWM 闪烁，但华硕提供了一种名为 "无闪烁调光 "的软件解决方案，可以避免典型的 PWM 闪烁，并保持在 DC 调光范围内。
性能配备 LPDDR5x-8533-RAM 的英特尔月亮湖处理器
测试条件
华硕提供各种风扇配置文件，这些配置文件还可与 Windows 能源配置文件同步。在以下基准测试和测量中，我们使用了与 Windows最佳性能配置文件相结合的性能模式。
处理器
我们的测试设备配备了 英特尔酷睿至尊 5 226V处理器。它提供四个快速性能核心和四个效率核心。因此，内核数量明显少于旧款流星湖处理器，而且由于更注重效率，最大 TDP 也明显降低。
在多核负载下，处理器最初的功耗在 36-39 瓦之间，大约 40 秒后稳定在 35 瓦。因此，整体性能也非常稳定。不过，多核性能并不是特别好，因为采用 AMD 芯片和老式 Meteor Lake CPU 的竞争对手的速度要明显快得多。
酷睿至尊 5 226V 在单核测试中表现更好，CPU 的累积性能完全可以满足许多日常应用的需要。不过，在多核测试中，具有相当低功耗限制的 AMD Zen 5 处理器仍然会更快。
在电池模式下，性能保持一致。更多 CPU 基准测试 点击此处.
Cinebench R15 Multi-core loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (9827 - 9940, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (1699 - 1749, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (3835 - 3885, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (653 - 674, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (1483 - 1514, n=3) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (261 - 270, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (346 - 355, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (33099 - 33302, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (5272 - 5335, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 15220, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (9850 - 10151, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (2527 - 2582, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3130, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (8704 - 8963, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (1852 - 1888, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (12.2 - 12.8, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (45.2 - 61.4, n=3) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (0.4808 - 0.4873, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (11962 - 12147, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (60013 - 60179, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (2551 - 2570, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (46991 - 47087, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (3914 - 3918, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (31779 - 32239, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (34159 - 36373, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (539 - 571, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (6593 - 6673, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (50096 - 50232, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
系统性能
在日常使用中，Vivobook S 14 OLED 是一台反应非常灵敏的电脑，在我们的测试中，系统稳定性没有出现任何问题。基准测试结果通常处于中下水平；不过，英特尔 Vivobook 在浏览器测试中表现更好。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V (6445 - 6672, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V (9363 - 9995, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V (8457 - 8977, n=3) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V (8983 - 9239, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V (1560 - 1582, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V (1517 - 1539, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V (1740 - 1740, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V (1225 - 1289, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V (272 - 284, n=2) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V (249 - 264, n=4) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V (507 - 543, n=4) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6480 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (99512 - 100162, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (83885 - 84394, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (106434 - 111499, n=3) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117898, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (91.1 - 94.3, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 播放、使用 Prime95 的 CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时没有受到任何限制。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备安装了美光 2500 512 GB 固态硬盘，初始启动后用户可使用 423 GB。M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘的传输速率总体不错，不会有任何问题。
即使在长时间负载的情况下，硬盘的性能也能保持稳定。更多的固态硬盘基准测试可在 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Disk throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
酷睿至尊 5 226V 配备集成图形处理器 Arc Graphics 130V其七个 Xe2 内核的最高主频可达 1.85 GHz。在满负荷运行时，图形处理器的功耗为 15 W，在基准测试中，iGPU 不得不向速度更快的老式 Arc Graphics 8 核版本和 AMD Radeon 780M 处理器认输。 AMD Radeon 780M/890M图形处理器
Arc Graphics 130V 完全可以满足日常多媒体使用，播放高分辨率视频完全没有问题，但在游戏时性能储备有限。
尽管如此，旧版本或要求不高的游戏通常也能流畅播放，并呈现出较高的细节。在长时间负载和电池模式下，GPU 性能都能保持稳定。更多 GPU 基准测试可在 技术部分可用。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 8815 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6913 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3451 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2413 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Arc Graphics 130V (550 - 624, n=3) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (210 - 364, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
* ... smaller is better
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10.3 - 31.4, n=34, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Ultra FPS chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 151.5 | 131.1 | 60.2 | 20.8 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 91.2 | 84.1 | 75.8 | 78.1 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 73.4 | 40.8 | 27.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 44.5 | 36.7 | 32.8 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 192.6 | 73.6 | 60.3 | 51.8 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 29.9 | 23.9 | 20.8 | 20.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 41.2 | 31.9 | 28.6 | 24.9 |
排放与能源：月湖比禅 5 更具优势
噪音排放
Core Ultra 5 226V 较低的功率限制对风扇噪音产生了积极影响。压力测试中的最大值为 45 分贝（A），高于 AMD 机型，但这也是在标准模式（对应于 Windows 均衡配置文件）下测得的，而在性能模式（Performance mdoe）下，噪音会更大，低于 50 分贝（A）。
此外，这也是我们在 CPU 和 GPU 满载的压力测试中测得的最大声压级。不过，在正常运行时，英特尔版本的 Vivobook S 14 OLED 仍然明显更安静，风扇也需要一段时间才能开始转动。
这在实际使用中非常明显，这使得 Vivobook S 14 OLED 成为一款相对更安静的设备。使用低风扇模式可以进一步降低风扇活动。我们的测试设备上没有其他电子噪音。
| 风扇模式 | Whisper | Standard | Power | Full power |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最大风量 | 28.8 dB(A) | 42 dB(A) | 45.6 dB(A) | 45.6 dB(A) |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.2 / 24.2 / 24.2 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 28.8 / 45.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.2 dB(A) | ||
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2550 512GB | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 Radeon 740M, R5 7540U, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -10% | -6% | -6% | -9% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 24.2 | 24 1% | 25 -3% | 24 1% | 23.8 2% | 25.7 -6% | 25.11 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.2 | 24 1% | 25 -3% | 25 -3% | 23.8 2% | 25.7 -6% | 25.11 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 24.2 | 25 -3% | 26 -7% | 27 -12% | 23.8 2% | 25.7 -6% | 25.11 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.2 | 27 -12% | 29 -20% | 29 -20% | 27.1 -12% | 25.7 -6% | 27.2 -12% |
| Load Average * | 28.8 | 40 -39% | 40 -39% | 37 -28% | 34.9 -21% | 36.2 -26% | 31.3 -9% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 37.6 | 39 -4% | 40 -6% | 37 2% | 43.7 -16% | 43.6 -16% | |
| Load Maximum * | 45.6 | 40 12% | 41 10% | 38 17% | 43.7 4% | 43.6 4% | 46.61 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度也比 AMD 机型更低，除了底部后部中间区域的热点外，即使在最大负载情况下，我们也几乎没有测得任何温度超过 40 °C。
这意味着该设备在大腿上使用也不会出现任何问题，而且在日常工作中表面几乎不会发热。在综合 CPU 和 GPU 负载的压力测试中，处理器的功耗稳定在 35 W。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.3 °C / 81.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1 °C / 1.8 F).
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 AMD Ryzen 5 7540U, AMD Radeon 740M | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -18% | -3% | -5% | -9% | -7% | -13% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 38.4 | 49 -28% | 41 -7% | 39 -2% | 43.7 -14% | 44.6 -16% | 45.2 -18% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 49.7 | 59 -19% | 45 9% | 46 7% | 49.4 1% | 50.9 -2% | 49.2 1% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.1 | 28 -12% | 26 -4% | 28 -12% | 27.7 -10% | 26.5 -6% | 29.6 -18% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25.8 | 29 -12% | 28 -9% | 29 -12% | 28.6 -11% | 26.3 -2% | 30.2 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
扬声器
立体声扬声器的声音整体上还算不错，声音的再现尤其得益于清晰的高音。
不过，低音有所欠缺，而且根据音乐风格或电影类型的不同，整体声音感觉有些单薄。
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
功耗测量结果表明，与 AMD 设备相比，测试设备具有明显优势。由于功耗限制较低，负载情况下功耗明显降低并不令人惊讶，但在空闲模式下，Lunar Lake 机型在显示屏相同的情况下也具有优势。
由于功耗更低，华硕可以使用更紧凑的 65 W 电源（223 克），而不是 90 W 适配器，后者的尺寸也足够大。
| Off / Standby | 0.25 / 0.42 Watt |
| Idle | 2.7 / 6.7 / 6.9 Watt |
| Load |
34.5 / 62.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2550 512GB | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 Radeon 740M, R5 7540U, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -71% | -15% | -22% | -60% | -65% | -37% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.7 | 6 -122% | 5 -85% | 5 -85% | 4.4 -63% | 4.8 -78% | 4.4 -63% |
| Idle Average * | 6.7 | 8 -19% | 6 10% | 6 10% | 9.2 -37% | 8.7 -30% | 5.6 16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.9 | 14 -103% | 10 -45% | 10 -45% | 9.6 -39% | 9.2 -33% | 12.5 -81% |
| Load Average * | 34.5 | 76 -120% | 36 -4% | 41 -19% | 62.6 -81% | 63.2 -83% | 52.1 -51% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 43 | 58.6 -36% | 41.6 3% | 42.5 1% | 71.5 -66% | 81.3 -89% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 41.9 | 61.9 -48% | 38.2 9% | 71.9 -72% | 80.2 -91% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 62.7 | 94 -50% | 60 4% | 58 7% | 101.7 -62% | 94.5 -51% | 67.3 -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Cyberpunk 2077 / Stress test
Power consumption: External monitor
电池寿命
Vivobook S 14 OLED 的 AMD 版电池续航时间已经非常出色，但 Lunar Lake 版的续航时间更长。在亮度为 150 cd/m²（相当于测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 68%）的 WLAN 测试中，我们测得 17:10 小时，因此比 Zen 5 SKU 多 40 分钟。
即使在全亮度状态下，Vivobook S 14 仍可持续使用 11 小时。在 150 尼特亮度下，H.264 1080p 视频循环甚至可以持续约 20 个小时。这些都是非常出色的数值。
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 75 Wh | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 75 Wh | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 65 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M, 60 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -5% | -27% | -43% | -17% | -52% | -8% | -28% | |
| H.264 | 1199 | 1251 4% | 612 -49% | 927 ? -23% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 1030 | 990 -4% | 753 -27% | 590 -43% | 888 -14% | 571 -45% | 758 -26% | 734 ? -29% |
| Load | 174 | 165 -5% | 101 -42% | 64 -63% | 194 11% | 117.7 ? -32% |
Notebookcheck 的总体评分
华硕 Vivobook S 14 OLED 得益于英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器的低功耗，尽管多核性能较低，但作为一款紧凑型伴侣，其整体性能更胜一筹。风扇依然更安静，温度更低，电池运行时间更长。
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA
- 12/29/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
