华硕 VivoBook S 14 OLED 笔记本电脑评测：Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的成功表现
我们测试的 VivoBook S 14（型号为 M5406WA）目前在网上的售价仅为 1,200 多美元，而在这个价格上，你可以获得最新的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370、24 GB（遗憾的是焊接上去的）快速 LPDDR5X-7500 内存和 1,000 GB NVMe SSD。显示内容由一块闪亮的 OLED 屏幕负责，分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 像素，宽高比为 16:10。Windows 11 Home 作为操作系统为整个软件包锦上添花。
VivoBook 的竞争对手包括 2024 年推出的其他 14 英寸笔记本电脑，如 联想 Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9(Core Ultra 7 155H)和 联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9(Ryzen 7 8845HS)，以及 华硕 Zenbook 14 UM3406HA(Ryzen 7 8840HS).所有这些候选产品都可以在下表中找到作为对比设备。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.9 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 84.7 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.5 kg | 12.9 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 88.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.6 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
| 88.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 88.6 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 |
请注意：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
案例
与大多数华硕笔记本电脑一样，VivoBook S 14 整体看起来非常时尚。与黑色表面的设备相比，其银色表面吸附的灰尘相对较少。它的盖子由金属制成，底座则由塑料制成。我们没有理由抱怨它的制造质量。
与许多其他（超薄）笔记本电脑类似，它的稳定性可以做得更好一些--无论是盖子的抗扭刚性，还是底座在受压时的表现（尤其是触摸板区域）。180° 的大开启角度为它加分不少。铰链做得很好（你可以用一只手打开笔记本电脑），不过振动吸收的程度有限，导致屏幕有点晃动。
14 英寸设备的重量仅为 1.3 千克，非常轻巧，便于运输。在同类产品中，只有 Zenbook 14 的重量更轻（1.2 千克）。它的机身高度为 1.59 厘米，属于中等水平。
连接性
端口
这款笔记本电脑的连接选项总体良好。虽然它没有配备 RJ45 端口，但在目前的全能笔记本电脑上，你可以看到其他一切。其中包括一个 HDMI 2.1 端口、两个支持 DisplayPort 和 Power Delivery 的 USB-C 端口（1x 4.0、1x 3.2 Gen 1）、一个 microSD 读卡器，以及左侧的一个 3.5 毫米插孔。右侧只有两个符合 3.2 Gen 1 标准的 USB-A 端口。
由于大部分接口都位于机身后半部分，因此使用鼠标没有任何问题或限制。
SD 读卡器
遗憾的是，安装的读卡器速度偏慢。其 40 MB/s 的速度大大超过了同一制造商生产的 IdeaPad Pro 5 和 Zenbook S16。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
交流
在我们的测试中，集成联发科芯片（Wi-Fi 6E MT7922）的无线局域网性能好坏参半。在我们的测试中（与参考路由器的距离为 1 米），它的接收性能与竞争对手相当，但发送性能却令人失望。
网络摄像头
该设备配备了一个相当标准的 2 百万像素网络摄像头，这意味着它的图像清晰度和色彩准确度都不是最好的。另一方面，它还配备了机械式隐私快门。
配件
笔记本电脑配有一个小巧的 90 瓦电源和几份信息宣传单。
维护
华硕可以让这款设备的维护工作变得更容易一些。11 颗外壳螺丝（Torx）中的一颗隐藏在一个盖子下面，很难取下。除此之外，机箱底盖可以很容易地从固定处取下。关于机箱内部，我们有一些不足之处需要注意：首先，内存和 WLAN 模块是焊接上去的；其次，只有一个 M.2 插槽。
可持续性
华硕笔记本电脑的包装主要采用硬纸板。它由织物插页和织物袋（每个都有标签）保护。只有电源装置使用了塑料薄膜。我们无法找到任何有关该设备二氧化碳排放量和外壳回收情况的信息。
保修
在美国，笔记本电脑享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。
输入设备
键盘
总的来说，键盘还是不错的。虽然某些布局决定可能有点问题（没有独立的电源按钮、方向箭头太小......）--但大多数笔记本电脑都是如此，而且在我们看来，键盘的反馈还可以更清晰一些，但除此之外，它的工作性能还是不错的。华硕为 VivoBook S 14 配备了单区 RGB 背光，可进行多级调节。特殊功能默认情况下无需按 Fn 键即可触发，如有需要也可更改。
触摸板
制造商为笔记本电脑的触摸板设计了一些不错的功能。例如，你可以在左侧通过轻扫手势方便地调节音量，而右侧则用于控制显示屏亮度。对于一款 14 英寸的笔记本电脑来说，触控板的尺寸大得出奇（约 13 x 8.5 厘米），使用起来也非常顺手。点击区域提供了不错的反馈，但在触发时听起来也有点嘎吱嘎吱的。
显示屏
不喜欢反光表面的 OLED 粉丝会对 VivoBook S 14 完全满意。由于采用了 OLED 典型的低黑值，支持 HDR 的 14 英寸面板实现了绝佳的对比度。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 385 cd/m²
Contrast: 12833:1 (Black: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.79
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.204
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Lenovo LEN145-3K (LEN8AAF), IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -4% | 1% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 98.4 -2% | 99.9 0% | 98.6 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.2 | 95.6 -2% | 86.9 -11% | 98.9 2% | 87.3 -10% |
| Response Times | 68% | -1812% | 32% | 33% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.3 ? | 0.56 ? 57% | 34.1 ? -2523% | 0.61 ? 53% | 1.31 ? -1% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1.2 ? | 0.65 ? 46% | 14.4 ? -1100% | 0.67 ? 44% | 1.2 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 480 100% | 240 ? 0% | 480 ? 100% | |
| Screen | 35% | -118% | -31% | 36% | |
| Brightness middle | 385 | 407 6% | 464 21% | 411 7% | 387 1% |
| Brightness | 382 | 405 6% | 456 19% | 414 8% | 386 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 97 2% | 90 -5% | 99 4% | 98 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.03 | 0.02 33% | 0.36 -1100% | 0.01 67% | |
| Contrast | 12833 | 20350 59% | 1289 -90% | 38700 202% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.99 | 0.6 70% | 0.9 55% | 2.8 -41% | 1 50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.69 | 1.2 67% | 2.32 37% | 5.5 -49% | 2.4 35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.79 | 0.35 80% | 2.2 -23% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 0.5 37% | 1.4 -75% | 1.8 -125% | 1.4 -75% |
| Gamma | 2.204 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.218 99% | 2.21 100% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6474 100% | 6453 101% | 6669 97% | 6319 103% | 6466 101% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 34% /
34% | -645% /
-335% | 1% /
-9% | 22% /
27% |
* ... smaller is better
此外，该面板几乎完全覆盖了 DCI-P3 和 AdobeRGB 空间，这一点非常好。我们对其色彩准确度、响应时间或视角也没有任何负面评价。
同时，它的亮度也只是刚刚够用。虽然 382 cd/m²（SDR 模式）的平均亮度与大多数同类产品基本一致，但由于会出现许多反射，那些经常待在明亮房间或户外的人很快就会希望获得更高的亮度（500 cd/m² 以上）。
此外，买家还必须忍受 OLED 面板典型的显示闪烁现象--至少在亮度低于 86 % 时是如此。240 至 480 Hz（视亮度而定）的频率可能会给敏感人群带来困扰。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz | ≤ 86 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 86 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
我们测试的这款 VivoBook S 14 可以归类为中端设备。例如，配备酷睿Ultra 5的其他机型价格略低。此外，还有一个完全可折叠的版本，名为 S 14 Flip。
测试条件
您可以使用预装的 MyAsus 应用程序在四种不同的运行模式中进行选择。由于配置文件性能和全速模式会导致设备在负载情况下发出令人不舒服的响声，而且几乎不会提高性能，因此我们使用标准模式进行了所有测量，该模式在笔记本交付状态下已处于激活状态。
| 赛博朋克 2077 (FHD/Ultra) | Whisper | Standard | Performance | Full speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 噪音 | 34 dB(A) | 39 dB(A) | 49 dB(A) | 53 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 23 fps | 25 fps | 26 fps | 26 fps |
处理器
与我们同样使用标准配置测试的 Zenbook S16 相比，VivoBook S 14 在基准测试中的表现要好得多，尽管它使用的是相同的处理器。这也难怪，因为该机型的 CPU 拥有更宽松的 TDP（54 瓦而不是 28 瓦 PL1）。CPU 的额定功率证明 VivoBook 的性能要高出 10%。这一点在 Cinebench 循环中也清晰可见，但遗憾的是，其性能无法长期保持完全稳定。
尽管如此，HX 370 还是击败了所有其他同类笔记本电脑的 CPU，无论是酷睿至尊 7 155H，还是 Ryzen 7 8840HS 或 8845HS。从技术上讲，采用 4 纳米工艺制造的 Zen 5 处理器拥有 12 个内核，通过 SMT 可以并行处理多达 24 个线程。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37654, n=7) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (97073 - 147937, n=8) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5843, n=8) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (84460 - 99088, n=8) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19021, n=8) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (51277 - 79251, n=7) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (68042 - 81929, n=8) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1086 - 1520, n=8) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13959 - 20608, n=8) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37747 - 50118, n=8) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
系统性能
在系统性能方面，VivoBook 也是对比设备中的佼佼者。正如 AIDA64 表所示，其内存性能也不差。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (7173 - 7646, n=4) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9751 - 10918, n=4) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9393 - 10615, n=4) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9828 - 11422, n=4) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1692 - 1789, n=3) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1588 - 1629, n=3) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1868 - 2117, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1398 - 1520, n=3) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (267 - 321, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (225 - 266, n=4) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (433 - 503, n=5) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7646 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (88377 - 92030, n=8) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (98398 - 100903, n=8) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (98429 - 108954, n=8) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117898, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (108.5 - 119.4, n=8) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
虽然笔记本电脑的延迟时间在测试现场是最低的，但 LatencyMon 工具还是实时标出了音频和视频编辑方面可能存在的问题，但这只会影响特定的用户群体。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
华硕安装了一个 1,000GB M.2 SSD 作为大容量存储。Micron 2400 是 NVMe 硬盘中速度中等的型号之一。幸运的是，我们没有发现热节流现象，即使在长时间负载的情况下，其性能也能保持稳定（见 DiskSpd 循环）。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
新的 iGPU 已经登场，即 Radeon 890M.它的主要竞争对手是 英特尔弧 8与成功的 Radeon 780M的性能相抗衡，而且由于改进了驱动程序，现在甚至已经成功超越了它。如果把所有的基准测试都考虑在内，这两款芯片看起来差别不大。890M 在合成测试中稍快，而 Arc 8 在运行游戏时更快。Zenbook S16 又一次被远远地甩在了后面。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Radeon 890M | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W -1! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 -1! | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA -1! | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 15204 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 180766 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 39499 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8792 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4073 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
除了要求超高的游戏，如Alan Wake 2、 Avatar Frontiers of Pandora和 地狱之刃 2Radeon 890M 可以在全高清或笔记本电脑的原始分辨率 1,920 x 1,200 像素下流畅运行几乎所有最新的游戏--即使通常只能满足中低设置。不过，AMD 仍需在驱动程序上下功夫。在测试的 38 款游戏中，有 4 款游戏再次出现崩溃或根本无法启动（Resident Evil 4 Remake ， Atlas Fallen 、 龙之教条 2& F1 24).
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 890M (31 - 34, n=4) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Radeon 890M (30.4 - 33.2, n=8) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
其稳定的性能值得肯定。在我们 30 分钟的测试中，运行 赛博朋克 2077的测试中，它的帧速率没有出现任何大的波动--例如，Zenbook S16 就出现了这种情况。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 174.3 | 161.5 | 79.1 | 32.4 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 171.8 | 135.7 | 35.8 | 33.6 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 78.9 | 44 | 31.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 78.2 | 58.6 | 46.2 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 98 | 57 | 53 | 50 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 186.7 | 76.3 | 63.8 | 54.2 |
| Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 42.6 | 36.8 | 24.8 | 19.3 |
| Returnal (2023) | 32 | 30 | 26 | 22 |
| Atomic Heart (2023) | 59.3 | 46 | 26.8 | 21.3 |
| Company of Heroes 3 (2023) | 93.1 | 65.3 | 49.8 | 49.1 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023) | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start |
| Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) | 31.8 | 26 | 21.5 | 20.9 |
| Atlas Fallen (2023) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) |
| Armored Core 6 (2023) | 49.8 | 43.3 | 40.1 | 33.1 |
| The Crew Motorfest (2023) | 40 | 36 | 30 | 26 |
| Lies of P (2023) | 62.5 | 53.9 | 46.3 | 38.4 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 43.7 | 35.4 | 28.9 | 28.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 46 | 36.3 | 29.3 | 25.4 |
| Counter-Strike 2 (2023) | 117.3 | 90.7 | 52.3 | 35.8 |
| Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 52 | 44 | 42 | 32 |
| Lords of the Fallen (2023) | 26.1 | 23.9 | 18.7 | 13.2 |
| Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 21.6 | 20.2 | 19.8 | |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 77 | 64 | 49 | 43 |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 22 | 20 | 17 | 12 |
| The Finals (2023) | 94.6 | 69.9 | 60.2 | 46.2 |
| Ready or Not (2023) | 75.3 | 59.8 | 43.8 | 27.5 |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 209 | 168.4 | 160.3 | |
| Palworld (2024) | 81.5 | 62.3 | 36.2 | 30.1 |
| Enshrouded (2024) | 23.2 | 22.9 | 20.3 | 14.5 |
| Helldivers 2 (2024) | 41.6 | 31.9 | 30.1 | 26.8 |
| Skull & Bones (2024) | 48 | 41 | 34 | 26 |
| Last Epoch (2024) | 60.4 | 44.9 | 38 | 30.2 |
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 30.6 | 27.3 | 21.1 | 19.9 |
| Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | ||
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 20.8 | 16.6 | 12.6 | |
| F1 24 (2024) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) |
| The First Descendant (2024) | 59.1 | 35 | 27.8 | 23.6 |
| Once Human (2024) | 51.6 | 38.3 | 30.2 | 25 |
排放量
噪音排放
除了有时噪音频率较高之外，这款笔记本电脑的风扇和风扇控制性能良好，至少在耳语或标准模式下是如此。在标准模式下，我们在空闲模式下测得的噪音为 24 至 27 分贝（风扇经常完全关闭），在负载模式下测得的噪音为 39 至 40 分贝（A），还是可以接受的。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24 / 25 / 27 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40 / 40 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | -1% | -1% | 0% | |
| off / environment * | 24 | 24.7 -3% | 24 -0% | 23.9 -0% | 25.1 -5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24 | 24.7 -3% | 25 -4% | 23.9 -0% | 25.1 -5% |
| Idle Average * | 25 | 24.7 1% | 27 -8% | 23.9 4% | 25.1 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27 | 26.4 2% | 30 -11% | 23.9 11% | 25.1 7% |
| Load Average * | 40 | 35.7 11% | 36 10% | 44.3 -11% | 35.9 10% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 39 | 36.8 6% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 40 | 36.8 8% | 38 5% | 44.3 -11% | 42.2 -6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 38 | 41.3 | 39.3 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
VivoBook 14 为数不多的弱点之一是温度不理想。虽然腕托始终保持在合理的范围内（即使在满载的情况下），但在极端情况下，机箱底部后三分之一的温度会升高到近 60 °C，这对将其放在膝上来说可不是什么好兆头。在空闲模式下，这款 14 英寸笔记本电脑的温度也往往高于大多数同类产品，尽管我们测量的所有数值都保持在绿色范围内。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.7 °C / -6.7 F).
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 1% | 16% | 20% | 11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 49 | 46.9 4% | 43 12% | 39.6 19% | 43.1 12% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 59 | 53.5 9% | 42 29% | 38.6 35% | 50.2 15% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 29.5 -5% | 25 11% | 24.8 11% | 25.8 8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29 | 30.2 -4% | 26 10% | 25.3 13% | 26.4 9% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试没有发现任何令人不安的意外。根据 HWMonitor 的数据，Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 在一段时间后稳定在 78 °C。
发言人
我们的音频分析证实，VivoBook S 14 的音效相当不错。除了最大音量外，它的低音还可以再强一些。例如，联想 Yoga Pro 7 在音效方面就明显领先。
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
耗电量
笔记本电脑的功耗测量没有发现任何异常。虽然 14 英寸设备在几乎所有情况下的功耗都略高于竞争对手，但 VivoBook 的整体性能也是最好的。附带的 90 瓦电源似乎足够大。
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.4 Watt |
| Idle | 6 / 8 / 14 Watt |
| Load |
76 / 94 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | 17% | 17% | 37% | 26% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6 | 5.4 10% | 4 33% | 5.3 12% | 3.6 40% | 4.44 ? 26% |
| Idle Average * | 8 | 10.5 -31% | 5.5 31% | 7.2 10% | 6.6 17% | 7.55 ? 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 14 | 10.9 22% | 11.8 16% | 7.5 46% | 7.4 47% | 9.45 ? 32% |
| Load Average * | 76 | 47.8 37% | 66 13% | 65.6 14% | 47.1 38% | 45.8 ? 40% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 58.6 | 49.2 16% | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 61.9 | 46.7 25% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 94 | 58.6 38% | 100 -6% | 89.6 5% | 54.3 42% | 68.4 ? 27% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 55 | 73 | 47.4 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
令人惊喜的是它的电池续航时间。Ryzen AI 9 在没有电源装置的情况下也能达到超级节能的效果。在理想条件下（最低亮度、Wi-Fi 关闭、几乎无负载），Ryzen AI 9 的续航时间将近 32 小时，而在亮度降至 150 cd/m² 的情况下，无线上网时的续航时间约为 16.5 小时。尽管电池容量相当大，但所有竞争对手都只能达到这样的数值。
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 75 Wh | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 78 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 73 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -35% | -31% | -31% | -24% | -22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1902 | 1750 ? -8% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 990 | 640 -35% | 680 -31% | 710 -28% | 774 -22% | 726 ? -27% |
| Load | 165 | 107 -35% | 110 -33% | 123 -25% | 115.4 ? -30% | |
| H.264 | 1204 | 1031 | 1046 | 911 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决
在我们的测试过程中，华硕 VivoBook S 14 OLED 显示出自己是一款快速且几乎完全成功的全能型产品，几乎不允许自己犯任何错误。
它的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370在标准模式下的表现已经绰绰有余，至少可以赶上英特尔酷睿 Ultra 的竞争对手（尤其是在 CPU 性能方面）。此外，集成的 Radeon 890M对于不一定需要以最高设置玩每款新游戏的休闲玩家来说，这是一个不错的选择。
除了一些小细节，这款笔记本电脑的其他方面也令人印象深刻。时尚的机身轻巧小巧，为用户提供了丰富的端口选择。此外，它还有良好的输入设备和对比度丰富、色彩鲜艳的 OLED 面板，但遗憾的是，其闪亮的表面也有其自身的缺点（反光强烈）。
真正令人印象深刻的运行时间是 VivoBook S 14 的主要亮点，这有助于使这款笔记本电脑成为出色的便携伴侣。
总的来说，这款 14 英寸笔记本电脑与 联想 Yoga Pro 7 14大致相当，后者配备了 酷睿至尊 7 155H价格相近。为了获得更高的评分，VivoBook S 14 OLED 的机箱温度必须更低，维护和升级选项必须更好（焊接内存，只有一个 M.2 插槽）。
价格和供应情况
VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA 的售价为 1,199.99 美元起，可通过亚马逊等主要在线零售商购买。
请注意：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息请点击http://www.notebookcheck.net/Our-new-rating-system-v8-explained-Lower-but-more-realistic-scores-together-with-sustainability-assessment.853123.0.html.
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA
- 08/27/2024 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
