申克 XMG Evo 14 (M24) 笔记本电脑评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和高达 96 GB 内存的全能型好手
申克公司新推出的 XMG Evo 14 是一款 14 英寸的紧凑型笔记本电脑,旨在以其丰富的连接方式和良好的维护选项在众多产品中脱颖而出。用户可以选择 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS(约 1060 美元起)或英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H(约 1223 美元起)以及相应的 iGPU。我们的测试机是 AMD 版,配备 32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 和预装 Windows 系统,售价约 1335 美元。此外,申克公司还发布了一份极为详细的深度报道介绍了有关 Evo 14 和 Evo 15 的所有信息。
另外,Tuxedo 还提供了 InfinityBook Pro 14 Gen9,这两款设备的配置相同,都支持 Linux。AMD 型号价格约为 1,345 美元,而英特尔型号的价格约为 1,470 美元。价格约为 1,470 美元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.9 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
84.9 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.5 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.1 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
83.5 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 17.08 mm | 14.20" | 2880x1920 | |
85.3 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE R5 7535U, Radeon 660M | 1.6 kg | 23 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
外壳和连接
与较大的 XMG Evo 15一样,制造商选择使用坚固的铝制外壳,只不过 Evo 14 的外壳不是黑色的,而是深灰色的。因此,它对指纹痕迹的敏感度要低得多。它的整体稳定性非常好,铰链也非常紧密,因此在调整盖子角度时,摇晃幅度很小。其最大开启角度接近 180 度。
与目前大多数其他 14 英寸笔记本电脑相比,Evo 14 配备了大量连接设备,包括千兆以太网和全读卡器。不过,让我们感到疑惑的是,为什么三个普通 USB-A 端口中只有一个支持旧的 2.0 标准。它的维护选项也很不错,有两个内存插槽(最大 96 GB)和两个 M.2 2280 SSD 插槽。尽管如此,机箱整体仍然相当紧凑,重量仅为 1.46 千克,也不算太重。
WLAN 模块(英特尔 AX210)的传输速率非常高且稳定,但还不支持 Wi-Fi 7。网络摄像头支持微软的 Studio Effects,拍照效果不错,由于配备了红外传感器,还可以通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。功能齐全的读卡器似乎不太喜欢我们的参考卡(最高 90 MB/s);使用另一张卡(威刚 V90)时,它的速度超过了 250 MB/s。这意味着,使用哪张卡会产生很大的差异。
黑色背光键盘与灰色外壳形成鲜明对比,打字手感一般,但较大的按键会发出较大的噪音。玻璃点击板(12.3 x 7.7 厘米)一般都能正常使用,但我们建议只使用点击板进行输入。机械点击发出的声音很大,感觉不是特别高质量。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (ADATA V90) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (ADATA V90) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Networking | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
显示屏 - IPS,400 nits & 100 % sRGB
Evo 14 的 14 英寸 IPS 显示屏采用 2,880 x 1,800 像素,宽高比为 16:10,因此图像非常清晰。磨砂表面有助于防止反光,但值得庆幸的是,画面看起来没有颗粒感。色彩鲜艳,但无法与 OLED 面板相比。反过来,由于没有使用 PWM,其 120Hz 的刷新率可确保动作流畅。它的亮度超过 400 cd/m²,加上不错的黑度,最大对比度超过 1,300:1。不过,亮度和色温都不能自动调节。
我们可以从控制中心下载一个预校准配置文件,该配置文件在我们的测试中给人留下了非常好的印象。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行了分析,其色彩和灰度偏差已经低于 3 的重要限制。我们可以通过自己的校准(可在右侧框中免费下载)进一步改善显示器,但这并非绝对必要。加上其完整的 sRGB 覆盖范围,该面板适用于编辑图像,没有任何限制。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 421 cd/m²
Contrast: 1316:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE NV140WUM-N49, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 25% | -1% | -1% | 1% | -46% | 26% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 71 | 99.9 41% | 70.3 -1% | 70.1 -1% | 72.42 2% | 37.7 -47% | 99.9 41% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 97.7 -2% | 99.79 0% | 56.1 -44% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.8 | 97.2 34% | 72.1 -1% | 72.3 -1% | 73.94 2% | 39 -46% | 98.9 36% |
Response Times | 93% | -19% | -23% | 5% | -15% | 97% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26.3 ? | 1.3 ? 95% | 32.7 ? -24% | 31.1 ? -18% | 7 ? 73% | 23.5 ? 11% | 0.61 ? 98% |
Response Time Black / White * | 13.4 ? | 1.2 ? 91% | 15.2 ? -13% | 17.1 ? -28% | 22 ? -64% | 18.8 ? -40% | 0.67 ? 95% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 238 ? | 240 ? | ||||
Screen | 92% | -7% | -44% | 197% | -250% | -52% | |
Brightness middle | 421 | 385 -9% | 418 -1% | 466 11% | 373 -11% | 419 0% | 411 -2% |
Brightness | 412 | 382 -7% | 408 -1% | 467 13% | 377 -8% | 399 -3% | 414 0% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 95 6% | 90 0% | 94 4% | 94 4% | 89 -1% | 99 10% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.03 91% | 0.3 6% | 0.29 9% | 0.015 95% | 0.31 3% | |
Contrast | 1316 | 12833 875% | 1393 6% | 1607 22% | 24867 1790% | 1352 3% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.99 -53% | 1.6 -23% | 2.5 -92% | 1.47 -13% | 7.5 -477% | 2.8 -115% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.4 | 3.69 -54% | 2.5 -4% | 6.1 -154% | 2.49 -4% | 28.3 -1079% | 5.5 -129% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1.79 -63% | 1.1 -0% | 1.3 -18% | 1.78 -62% | 6.2 -464% | 2.2 -100% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 0.8 43% | 2 -43% | 4.1 -193% | 1.7 -21% | 4.6 -229% | 1.8 -29% |
Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.204 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.179 101% | 2.02 109% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 6446 101% | 6474 100% | 6851 95% | 7386 88% | 6556 99% | 6057 107% | 6319 103% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 70% /
78% | -9% /
-7% | -23% /
-32% | 68% /
127% | -104% /
-172% | 24% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
13.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.3 ms rise | |
↘ 8.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
26.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.9 ms rise | |
↘ 14.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - Ryzen 7 8845HS 和最高 96GB 内存
XMG Evo 14 有三种性能配置文件可供选择(平衡、发烧、超增压),我们在下表中汇总了相关数据。我们使用默认的"发烧友 "模式进行基准测试和测量。
能源概况 | CPU TDP | CPU TDP 电池 | CB R23 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | 最大风扇噪音排放 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
平衡型 | 25 瓦 | 25 瓦 | 12,318 点 | 2,661 点 | 29 dB(A) |
发烧级 | 45 瓦 | 35 瓦 | 15,494 点 | 2,860 点 | 37.6 dB(A) |
超增压 | 60 瓦 | 50 瓦 | 16,315 分 | 2,914 分 | 44.6 dB(A) |
XMG Evo 14 是一款速度超快的笔记本电脑,配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS(Zen 4)提供了非常出色和稳定的整体性能,尽管它无法赶上新的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370(Zen 5)。即便如此,Zen 5 CPU 目前也只提供焊接式内存。在我们的测试过程中,Evo 14 的响应速度始终如一,我们没有发现系统稳定性方面的问题,而且其延迟也非常低。我们的测试设备使用的是 1 TB 版本的三星 990 Pro,其传输速率非常高。在长时间负载的情况下也能保持稳定,这不是理所当然的。
集成的 Radeon 780M iGPU集成的 Radeon 780M iGPU 达到了不错的性能值,在游戏中表现尤为突出,仅次于英特尔 Arc Graphics 8 XGPU。 配备 8 个 Xe 内核的英特尔弧形图形处理器在合成测试中,英特尔 Arc Graphics 依然明显处于领先地位。不过,新的 Radeon 890M在我们的标准游戏基准测试中明显更快。在长时间负载情况下,其图形性能依然保持稳定。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14895 - 18037, n=11) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=11) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5808 - 7026, n=11) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (673 - 698, n=11) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2342 - 2908, n=11) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=11) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (62669 - 74664, n=11) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 25760, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=15) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2510 - 2698, n=13) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11256 - 12726, n=12) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=12) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=11) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.4 - 77, n=11) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4304 - 0.4935, n=11) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (23708 - 29544, n=11) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (99659 - 125873, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4332 - 5180, n=11) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (109458 - 124695, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14062 - 15519, n=11) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (53436 - 67367, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64515 - 172642, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=11) | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (12361 - 15911, n=11) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (33192 - 41668, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7120 - 7641, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10685 - 11570, n=7) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9787 - 10482, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9009 - 10009, n=7) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1633 - 1939, n=7) | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1562 - 1872, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1734 - 2040, n=7) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1437 - 1849, n=7) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=87, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (295 - 334, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (245 - 314, n=7) | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (501 - 664, n=7) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7284 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (61459 - 71873, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=11) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (68425 - 93239, n=11) | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (82.5 - 117, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 13295 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7728 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3215 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 500 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2816 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Average of class Multimedia (308 - 683, n=5, last 2 years) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Average of class Multimedia (167 - 946, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (300 - 664, n=54) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (203 - 215, n=3, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 164.4 | 152.9 | 65 | 27.1 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 147 | 47 | 36 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 160.1 | 127.5 | 85.9 | 78.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 78 | 38.3 | 27.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 65.6 | 46.7 | 39.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 83 | 49 | 45 | 43 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 161.3 | 66.7 | 56 | 48.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 41.4 | 32.6 | 26.3 | 23 |
排放与动力
Evo 14 使用两个风扇,日常使用时非常安静。即使在游戏或压力测试中,我们在 "发烧友 "模式下测得的最大噪音也只有 37.6 分贝(A)。不过,在使用平衡模式时,设备会变得更加安静(最大 29 dB(A))。在"超增压 "模式下,我们听到了 44.6 dB(A)的巨响,但这并不值得,因为功率并没有增加多少。我们的测试设备没有发出其他电子噪音。
除了底部有一个热点外,其表面温度完全无害。尤其是键盘区域始终保持着宜人的温度。不过,在大量使用时应避免皮肤接触底部。
尽管采用了高分辨率 120 Hz 面板,但这款笔记本电脑的闲置功耗非常低,我们在负载情况下也没有发现任何问题。我们测得的最大功耗为 83 瓦,在压力测试中该值很快趋于平稳,约为 76 瓦。100 瓦的电源完全够用。该设备的 80 瓦时电池可提供良好的电池运行时间,但这甚至被一些竞争对手超越。在 WLAN 测试中,我们测得的运行时间略低于 12 小时(150 cd/m²)和 9:40 小时(最大亮度)。在 120 Hz 的情况下,每种情况下都要少用 60 分钟左右。在视频测试中,它的续航时间达到了 15.5 小时。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.7 / 24.7 / 26.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 37.6 / 37.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A) |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE Radeon 660M, R5 7535U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -2% | -5% | -3% | -2% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 24.7 | 24 3% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 24 3% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
Idle Average * | 24.7 | 25 -1% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.3 | 27 -3% | 27.1 -3% | 25.7 2% | 27.2 -3% | 24.5 7% | 23.9 9% |
Load Average * | 37.6 | 40 -6% | 34.9 7% | 36.2 4% | 31.3 17% | 38 -1% | 44.3 -18% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 37.6 | 39 -4% | 43.7 -16% | 43.6 -16% | 41.4 -10% | ||
Load Maximum * | 37.6 | 40 -6% | 43.7 -16% | 43.6 -16% | 46.61 -24% | 41.5 -10% | 44.3 -18% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.3 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.1 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE AMD Ryzen 5 7535U, AMD Radeon 660M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -11% | -2% | -1% | -6% | 0% | 11% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.7 | 49 -18% | 43.7 -5% | 44.6 -7% | 45.2 -8% | 43.1 -3% | 39.6 5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 50.1 | 59 -18% | 49.4 1% | 50.9 -2% | 49.2 2% | 45.7 9% | 38.6 23% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.1 | 28 -3% | 27.7 -2% | 26.5 2% | 29.6 -9% | 27.9 -3% | 24.8 8% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.7 | 29 -5% | 28.6 -3% | 26.3 5% | 30.2 -9% | 28.3 -2% | 25.3 9% |
* ... smaller is better
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.46 / 1.39 Watt |
Idle | 4.6 / 7.8 / 8 Watt |
Load |
71.7 / 83 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 75 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE R5 7535U, Radeon 660M, 57 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 53% | 20% | -30% | 51% | -8% | 7% | -7% | |
H.264 | 929 | 1251 35% | 612 -34% | 1031 11% | 847 ? -9% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 715 | 990 38% | 888 24% | 571 -20% | 758 6% | 748 5% | 710 -1% | 640 ? -10% |
Load | 99 | 165 67% | 101 2% | 64 -35% | 194 96% | 79 -20% | 110 11% | 97.1 ? -2% |
Reader / Idle | 1902 | 1168 ? | ||||||
Gaming | 85 | 92 ? |
Pros
Cons
评语 - XMG Evo 14 是一款出色的全套设备,没有通常的折衷方案
申克的 XMG Evo 14 证明,即使是现代笔记本电脑,也不需要没有大量的连接和广泛的维护选项。通过使用两个内存插槽,您可以获得高达 96 GB 的内存容量,其固态硬盘容量可以轻松扩展,而且机身上还有大量连接。此外,该设备还可以进行大量配置。
AMD 处理器性能良好,最重要的是性能稳定,Radeon 780M 也是如此。该设备的 IPS 显示屏拥有高分辨率、120 Hz 的刷新率和准确的色彩,这意味着您可以在 sRGB 色彩空间内轻松编辑图像。
新款申克 XMG Evo 14 的入门价格仅为 1,000 多美元,却提供了包括金属外壳在内的出色的整体解决方案。尽管它的机身相对小巧,但性能稳定、连接众多、维护方便。
它的运行时间总体不错,尽管有不少竞争对手提供了更好的耐力。新款 XMG Evo 14 的入门价格约为 1,000 美元,您尤其应该关注一下。虽然英特尔型号支持 Thunderbolt 4,但在我们看来,其有限的性能提升并不值得加价。
价格和供应情况
XMG Evo 14 AMD 在美国没有销售,但可以在 bestware.com 等国际商店购买,价格约为1,000 美元起。
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24)
- 09/22/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.