申克 XMG Focus 15 (E23) 经济型游戏笔记本电脑评测：比Pro 15性能更强，价格更低

Name: SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23)
Brand: SCHENKER

适用于预算有限的狐狸的Pro 15。

如果您可以不使用金属外壳和全RGB键盘，您不一定非要选择昂贵的XMG Pro 15。在我们的测试中，XMG Focus 15的性能与Pro 15相当，只是在某些方面稍逊一筹。作为回报，Focus 15的基本价格比Pro 15低约400欧元，而性能却几乎相似。

Marc Herter, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/17/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Raptor Lake Intel Gaming Laptop / Notebook Geforce Windows

我们首先测试了XMG Focus 15早在2021年底。Focus 15是一款将当时全新的RTX 3050 Ti 笔记本电脑 GPU达到了极限。尽管采用了散热技术，但XMG Focus 15在高温下的性能仅高于平均水平。

目前的Focus 15再次采用了Clevo的裸机，这次是NP50SNC机箱。与最近测试的XMG Pro 15类似，我们发现英特尔酷睿i9-13900HX处理器。

Focus 15的高端处理器辅以入门级GPU--Nvidia RTX 4050笔记本GPU。NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050笔记本电脑GPU32GB工作内存和1TB Crucial NVMe固态硬盘。

像往常一样，申克提供了广泛的配置选项。买家还可以为Focus 15配置RTX 4060笔记本GPU或RTX 4070笔记本GPU以及额外的内存选项。

由于我们的评测样品采用了入门级图形处理器，因此我们将XMG Pro 15归类为入门级游戏笔记本电脑。然而，入门级游戏笔记本电脑通常没有如此高性能的处理器和不超过16GB的工作内存，因此我们也在高端多媒体笔记本电脑中寻找相应的对比设备。

其中包括微星卡塔纳15或华硕TUF A15游戏笔记本和三星Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16或宏碁Swift X SFX14-71G作为多媒体笔记本电脑。笔记本电脑XMG Pro 15XMG Pro 15也在此次比较中占有一席之地--申克的这款更昂贵的笔记本电脑与其更便宜的同类产品仅在几个方面有所不同。

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Clevo NP50SNC (XMG Focus 15 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 162 W PL2 / Short Burst, 135 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Intel UHD Graphics 770

Memory

32 GB

, 2 x 16 GB DDR5-5600 SK Hynix (SO-DIMM)

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 2569 x 1440 pixel 189 PPI, BOE0AD1, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Storage

Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, 1024 GB

, 890 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Kombistecker Headset , Card Reader: microSD

Networking

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 26.9 x 359.5 x 238

Battery

73 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: FullHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet Tastatur RGB , Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.4 kg, Power Supply: 990 g

Price

1800 Euro

Links

SCHENKER homepage
SCHENKER notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.1 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	26.9 mm	15.60"	2569x1440
86.2 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.9 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	Acer Swift X SFX14-71G i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1.5 kg	17.9 mm	14.50"	2880x1800
89.4 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1.8 kg	16.5 mm	16.00"	2880x1800
89.4 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1.4 kg	17 mm	14.00"	2880x1800

底盘坚固的塑料

这款笔记本电脑的外壳完全由坚固的塑料制成，只有在散热片的格栅后面才能看到金属。Clevo和Schenker保持了相当简洁的设计。品牌标志仅以黑底XMG标志的形式出现。

尽管外壳主要由塑料制成，但我们并没有发现质量方面的任何弱点。笔记本电脑在各方面都很坚固，扭动时不会发出嘎吱声，缝隙非常窄且均匀。单手即可将显示屏盖打开约140°，并始终保持其位置。

对于一款16:10格式的15.6英寸游戏笔记本电脑来说，重量和厚度都不算典型。不过，与其他多媒体笔记本电脑相比，硬件相似的笔记本电脑也可能会更轻薄一些。

尺寸比较

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Asus TUF A15 FA507 Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF DIN A4 ❌

设备：三面USB接口

自上次评测以来，XMG Focus 15的连接方面几乎没有变化。唯一新增加的是另一个USB-C端口，但SD读卡器已减少为microSD格式。

两个USB Type-C接口都不提供电源。因此，您可能需要随身携带近1公斤重的电源适配器。

Kensington 安全插槽、USB Type-A 3.2 Gen1、USB-A 2.0、麦克风输入、3.5 mm 组合插孔

microSD 读卡器，带 DisplayPort 的 Thunderbolt 4/USB4.0 Gen 3x1，RJ45 千兆网卡

USB Type-C Gen 2x1、Mini DisplayPort 1.4a (G-Sync)、HDMI 2.1 (G-Sync；HDCP 2.3)、电源接口

SD卡读卡器

在我们的测试设备上使用AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60或Pro 15 GB V60，SD卡传输速率良好。 Pro 15尽管并不出众。

我们比较的另外两款游戏笔记本电脑没有读卡器。

SD Card Reader - maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	186.02 MB/s +107%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=89, last 2 years)	119.6 MB/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	89.98 MB/s
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	86.1 MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	83 MB/s -8%

通讯

Focus 15中的英特尔AX211 Wi-Fi模块在Wi-Fi 6E网络中与我们参考的华硕ROG Rapture AXE-GT11000路由器一起提供了很高的传输速度。

另一方面，在相同的测试设置下，5 GHz Wi-Fi 6网络的传输速度似乎低于平均水平。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1601 (1494^min, 1511.98^P1 - 1649^max) MBit/s +70%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1574 (1478^min - 1665^max) MBit/s +67%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1529 (623^min - 1608^max) MBit/s +62%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1493 (1452^min - 1534^max) MBit/s +59%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=150, last 2 years)	1237 MBit/s +31%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1921, n=239)	1234 MBit/s +31%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921	985 (902^min - 1065^max) MBit/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	941 (465^min - 984^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1679 (1641^min - 1697^max) MBit/s +75%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1666 (840^min - 1685^max) MBit/s +74%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1638 (1438^min - 1710^max) MBit/s +71%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1419 (1355^min, 1363.41^P1 - 1447^max) MBit/s +48%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=150, last 2 years)	1386 MBit/s +45%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=239)	1379 MBit/s +44%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	957 (480^min - 968^max) MBit/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921	917 (797^min - 933^max) MBit/s -4%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1609 (844^min - 1675^max) MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1594 (1492^min - 1637^max) MBit/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=71, last 2 years)	1431 MBit/s -11%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (632 - 1851, n=211)	1372 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1677 (838^min - 1686^max) MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1667 (1652^min - 1678^max) MBit/s -1%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=210)	1493 MBit/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1788, n=71, last 2 years)	1490 MBit/s -11%

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1581 (844-1675)

Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1594 (1492-1637)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1649 (838-1686)

Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1667 (1652-1678)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (465-984)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø985 (902-1065)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1509 (623-1608)

Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1601 (1494-1649)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1493 (1452-1534)

Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1574 (1478-1665)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø940 (480-968)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø916 (797-933)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (840-1685)

Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1419 (1355-1447)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (1438-1710)

Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1679 (1641-1697)

网络摄像头

新款Focus 15的全高清网络摄像头仅能完美聚焦于图像中心。因此，中心部分清晰且对比度高，而边缘部分则显得有些暗淡。

摄像头的高色彩偏差令人恼火，尤其是肤色还原不佳。

ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23): 18.54 ∆E min: 10.44 - max: 25.04 ∆E

安全性

Focus 15没有生物识别认证选项。Kensington安全插槽可提供物理防盗保护。

TPM 2.0和SecureBoot可防止未经授权的数据访问。

配件

在包装盒中，除了电源和文档外，我们还发现了一个内容丰富的配件包。您会得到一个印有XMG标志的大鼠标垫和一个配套的开瓶器，以及一张安装光盘和一个U盘，U盘中包含Windows系统的配套程序和驱动程序。

维护

XMG Focus 15的固态硬盘、工作内存和WLAN模块均可更换。在我们的测试设备中，有一个空闲的M.2 PCIe 4.0插槽。

笔记本电脑的整个底板由11颗PH0螺钉固定，可以很容易地拆卸下来，以接触相应的组件。拧松螺丝后，盖子可以顺利掀开。

质保

申克公司为笔记本电脑提供24个月的免费基本保修服务。您还可以在结账时通过Bestware添加更多保修选项。

Input devices: RGB keyboard

键盘

在笔记本电脑的黑色键盘面板上输入白字按键，强烈的触觉反馈和1.5毫米的键程带来了良好的打字体验。申克公司可根据要求在黑色键盘表面激光蚀刻出所有可以想象到的语言布局。RGB灯光让键盘呈现出所需的颜色。

触摸板

Focus 15的触摸板尺寸约为7厘米×12厘米，小于大多数游戏笔记本电脑。不过，它足够大，可以舒适地用多个手指在整个屏幕上导航，并执行所有可能的多点触控手势。

触摸板的位置和大小还提供了足够的空间，避免手跟部的错误输入。光滑的表面和舒适的点击使鼠标输入更加流畅。

显示屏QHD，240赫兹

Focus 15采用了与XMG Pro 15相同的高品质IPS面板。不过，在我们的评测样本中，它的平均亮度为302 cd/m²，比Pro 15略暗。屏幕刷新率为240赫兹，分辨率为2560×1440。

哑光显示屏的黑色值和对比度均可接受，亮度也不错。屏幕上几乎看不到背光出血现象。

除了QHD显示屏，申克还为XMG Focus 15提供了全高清显示屏。不过，两种显示屏都支持G-Sync。

那些将笔记本电脑作为纯游戏设备购买并希望将其与 RTX 4050的用户应考虑选择全高清显示屏，价格便宜约80欧元。无论如何，大多数游戏只支持sRGB色彩空间，与RTX 4050结合使用可充分利用显示器的功能。

入门级Nvidia显卡只能在有限的范围内实现QHD或4K游戏。


302 cd/m²	285 cd/m²	275 cd/m²
285 cd/m²	302 cd/m²	262 cd/m²
257 cd/m²	276 cd/m²	262 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE0AD1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 302 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 278.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 302 cd/m²
Contrast: 839:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.87 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) BOE0AD1, IPS, 2569x1440, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) BOE0AD1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	Asus TUF A15 FA507 N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK AUOAF90 (B156HAN08.4), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Swift X SFX14-71G ATNA45AF03-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5"	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16"	Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Samsung SDC4192 (ATNA40YK14-0), OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Display		-1%	-20%	-53%	4%	4%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	98.6	97.8 -1%	64.9 -34%	38.1 -61%	99.9 1%	99.9 1%	99.8 1%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	99.9 0%	96.5 -3%	56.8 -43%	99.9 0%	100 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	86.3	85.4 -1%	66.6 -23%	39.3 -54%	96.2 11%	96.3 12%	88.7 3%
Response Times		14%	-87%	-140%	96%	96%	82%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	15.6 ?(7.4, 8.2)	14 ?(6.6, 7.4) 10%	30.4 ?(14.8, 15.6) -95%	38.8 ?(18.6, 20.2) -149%	0.4 ?(0.2, 0.2) 97%	0.49 ?(0.26, 0.23) 97%	2.4 ?(1.4, 1) 85%
Response Time Black / White *	11.6 ?(5.8, 5.8)	9.6 ?(4.2, 5.4) 17%	20.8 ?(11.7, 9.1) -79%	26.8 ?(14.2, 12.6) -131%	0.6 ?(0.3, 0.3) 95%	0.65 ?(0.37, 0.28) 94%	2.4 ?(1.4, 1) 79%
PWM Frequency					240 ?(100)	240 ?(100)	300
Screen		10%	30%	-38%	30%	215%	103%
Brightness middle	302	322 7%	288 -5%	261 -14%	388 28%	400 32%	423 40%
Brightness	278	301 8%	271 -3%	258 -7%	390 40%	399 44%	427 54%
Brightness Distribution	85	85 0%	91 7%	92 8%	98 15%	93 9%	98 15%
Black Level *	0.36	0.36 -0%	0.17 53%	0.19 47%		0.03 92%	0.1 72%
Contrast	839	894 7%	1694 102%	1374 64%		13333 1489%	4230 404%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.24	1.98 12%	1.9 15%	5.57 -149%	2.2 2%	2.3 -3%	0.55 75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.52	5.24 5%	3.3 40%	20.6 -273%	3.9 29%	4.15 25%	1.15 79%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.87	2.44 37%	2.7 30%	3.19 18%	1.4 64%	2.7 30%	0.69 82%
Gamma	2.42 ^91%	2.42 ^91%	2.32 ^95%	2.45 ^90%	2.22 ^99%	2.266 ^97%	2.42 ^91%
CCT	6936 ^94%	6984 ^93%	6535 ^99%	6146 ^106%	6380 ^102%	7047 ^92%	6479 ^100%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		1.98	0.9	4.63	1.9	1.66	1.15
Total Average (Program / Settings)		8% / 8%	-26% / 0%	-77% / -57%	43% / 35%	105% / 148%	62% / 76%

* ... smaller is better

对于摄像师和内容创作者来说，XMG Focus 15近乎完整的Display P3色彩空间覆盖范围应该是一个优势。AdobeRGB色彩空间对于照片编辑和打印更为重要，而Focus 15只能再现88%的色彩空间。

我们测试设备的屏幕具有良好的色彩还原性，平均色彩偏差为ΔΕ 2.24（出厂值）。校准后，该值会进一步改善。

我们发现，当照明度设置为150尼特时，色彩还原性也会得到改善。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.8 ms rise
11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.4 ms rise
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

由于采用了哑光表面，只要注意位置和与阳光的角度，亮度适中的显示屏在户外也可以使用。幸运的是，由于屏幕的视角相当稳定，因此通常可以找到一个有利的位置。

性能：极致性能的酷睿i9处理器

德铁信可为 XMG Focus 15 提供多种配置选项。所有配置的处理器均为英特尔酷睿i9-13900HX.支持该处理器的英伟达芯片为 GeForce RTX 4050, RTX 4060或 RTX 4070 在Bestware的配置过程中提供了多种内存选项。

我们的测试设备配备了NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050笔记本GPU和32GB工作内存。凭借Ada Lovelace一代最低的图形芯片，该笔记本电脑能够流畅地玩许多当前的游戏，尽管如果您想利用显示屏的全QHD分辨率，可能需要限制质量设置。

测试条件

通过申克的控制中心可以访问四种不同的性能方案。虽然省电模式和睡眠模式明显限制了测试设备的性能，但当长时间需要笔记本电脑提供大量性能时，性能模式和娱乐模式的基准往往非常接近。

尽管如此，处理器的提升阶段在性能模式下持续的时间要长得多。在近1.5分钟的提升阶段，处理器可以轻松通过Cinebench R23或Blender等基准测试。各个模式下的功率限制如下：

模式：	电源模式	娱乐模式	省电模式
CPU PL1	135 W	55 W	15 W
CPU PL2	162 W	130 W	30 W
目标温度 CPU	93 °C	87 °C	85 °C
GPU TGP + Dynamic Boost	115 W + 25 W	115 W + 0 W	115 W + 0 W
目标温度 GPU	87 °C	87 °C	87 °C

在我们的测试中，笔记本电脑可以达到性能模式的高目标速率。这些数值与申克的 XMG Pro 15.因此，两款处理器在Focus和Pro中的性能几乎完全相同。

为了更好地比较这两款设备，我们最终决定也在XMG Focus 15的性能模式下运行所有基准测试。

处理器

配备英特尔酷睿i9-13900HXXMG Focus 15采用了英特尔酷睿i9-13900HX处理器，这是Raptor Lake-HX一代最高端的笔记本处理器之一。该处理器的速度甚至比 Pro 15.

在现代处理器的流畅运行方面，差异更加明显。该处理器拥有8个P-cores和16个E-cores，32个线程，可提供极强的多任务处理能力。Focus 15和 Pro 15在对比设备中名列前茅。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop Test

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3594 (3477.05-4085.8)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3332 (3186.24-3913.13)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2219 (2188.66-2273.89)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1968 (1876.44-2253.14)

Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1577 (1282.09-2465.48)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1739 (1422.32-2515.18)

Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2029 (1995.31-2490.5)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	85.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	75.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	72.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	70.4 pt
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	58.9 pt
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H	58 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	55.9 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	55.4 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	52.5 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (24270 - 32623, n=22)	28225 Points +16%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	24574 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	24270 Points
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=192, last 2 years)	21689 Points -11%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H	15609 Points -36%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	15537 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	15306 Points -37%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	14325 (12974.5^min - 14324.9^max) Points -41%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	13750 Points -43%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1867 - 2105, n=19)	2044 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	1935 Points
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H	1896 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=190, last 2 years)	1879 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	1867 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	1840 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	1698 Points -12%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	1697 Points -12%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points -20%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9152 - 12541, n=20)	10766 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	9250 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	9152 Points
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=190, last 2 years)	8254 Points -10%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H	6070 Points -34%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	6009 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	5926 Points -35%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	5373 Points -41%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5354 Points -41%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (722 - 810, n=20)	784 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	742 Points
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H	732 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	722 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=190, last 2 years)	722 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	712 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	657 Points -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	652 Points -12%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	603 Points -19%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (3913 - 4970, n=21)	4522 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	4086 (3477.05^min - 4085.8^max) Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	3913 (3186.24^min - 3913.13^max) Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=197, last 2 years)	3399 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	2515 Points -38%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	2491 (1995.31^min - 2490.5^max) Points -39%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H	2465 (1282.09^min - 2465.48^max) Points -40%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2274 (2188.66^min - 2273.89^max) Points -44%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	2253 (1876.44^min - 2253.14^max) Points -45%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (247 - 304, n=21)	292 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=194, last 2 years)	277 Points +3%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H	274 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	270 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	268 Points -1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	249 Points -8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	247 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	247 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	246 Points -9%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H	299 Seconds * -121%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	234 Seconds * -73%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	233 Seconds * -73%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	223 Seconds * -65%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	221 Seconds * -64%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=185, last 2 years)	171.9 Seconds * -27%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	148 Seconds * -10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	135 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=21)	117.9 Seconds * +13%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (90675 - 127283, n=20)	111796 MIPS +13%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	99191 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	90675 MIPS -9%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=189, last 2 years)	84760 MIPS -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	60842 MIPS -39%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	60612 MIPS -39%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	59034 MIPS -40%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	58703 MIPS -41%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H	55929 MIPS -44%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (6340 - 7177, n=20)	6848 MIPS +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	6367 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	6340 MIPS 0%
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=189, last 2 years)	6283 MIPS -1%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H	6100 MIPS -4%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	6041 MIPS -5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5786 MIPS -9%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	5537 MIPS -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	5510 MIPS -13%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17614 - 21075, n=21)	19809 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	18308 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	17614 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=190, last 2 years)	14915 Points -19%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H	11556 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	11497 Points -37%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	11198 Points -39%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	10955 Points -40%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9346 Points -49%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1345 - 2093, n=21)	1988 Points +48%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=190, last 2 years)	1884 Points +40%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	1869 Points +39%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H	1840 Points +37%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	1818 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	1692 Points +26%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	1667 Points +24%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1507 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	1345 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (23.5 - 34.4, n=21)	29.1 fps +16%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	25 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	23.5 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=189, last 2 years)	23.3 fps -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	17.4 fps -30%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.4 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	16.8 fps -33%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	15.7 fps -37%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H	13.2 fps -47%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	51.1 s * -29%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50.6 s * -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	49.6 s * -26%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=186, last 2 years)	47.5 s * -20%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	47 s * -19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 51.1, n=20)	42.5 s * -8%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	41.1 s * -4%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H	41 s * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	39.5 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4964 sec * -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	0.4904 sec * -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.489 sec * -13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4564 sec * -5%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H	0.447 sec * -3%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=190, last 2 years)	0.44 sec * -1%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4398 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4345 sec *
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21)	0.402 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4086 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

230 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

270 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

9152 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

742 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1935 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

24270 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	99.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	88.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	84.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	80.6 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66.7 pt
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	62.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	61.6 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	60.1 pt
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	47.8 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21)	24097 KRay/s +17%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=186, last 2 years)	21665 KRay/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	20615 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	17906 KRay/s -13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	16315 KRay/s -21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	15620 KRay/s -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	14049 KRay/s -32%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	12817 KRay/s -38%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8777 KRay/s -57%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21)	120602 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	108878 Points
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=186, last 2 years)	106091 Points -3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	102221 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	95763 Points -12%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	76434 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	69259 Points -36%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	64115 Points -41%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	43430 Points -60%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21)	6061 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	5324 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=186, last 2 years)	4859 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	4747 MB/s -11%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3421 MB/s -36%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3247 MB/s -39%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3244 MB/s -39%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3016 MB/s -43%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2374 MB/s -55%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	134897 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21)	133924 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	133669 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=186, last 2 years)	116375 Points -14%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	107159 Points -21%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	105541 Points -22%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	103991 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	100136 Points -26%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	87225 Points -35%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21)	14889 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	13789 Points
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=186, last 2 years)	13176 Points -4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	12579 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	12458 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	9065 Points -34%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8708 Points -37%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8694 Points -37%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	6318 Points -54%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21)	59821 Points +15%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	55524 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=186, last 2 years)	53445 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	51986 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	44710 Points -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	37738 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	34531 Points -34%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	31971 Points -39%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	22194 Points -57%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21)	139015 MB/s +35%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	112823 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=186, last 2 years)	109398 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	102731 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	92203 MB/s -10%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83025 MB/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67264 MB/s -35%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66845 MB/s -35%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66447 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21)	1755 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1587 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1410 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=186, last 2 years)	1351 MB/s -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	997 MB/s -37%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	879 MB/s -45%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	841 MB/s -47%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	671 MB/s -58%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	651 MB/s -59%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21)	13066 KRay/s +16%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=186, last 2 years)	11668 KRay/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	11242 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	9779 KRay/s -13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8556 KRay/s -24%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8448 KRay/s -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	7496 KRay/s -33%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	6913 KRay/s -39%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	4595 KRay/s -59%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	52727 MPixel/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	50110 MPixel/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	50064 MPixel/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21)	48439 MPixel/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48148 MPixel/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=187, last 2 years)	39972 MPixel/s -20%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	39826 MPixel/s -21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	37023 MPixel/s -26%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28318 MPixel/s -43%

系统性能

英伟达入门级GPU GeForce RTX 4050在PCMark 10基准测试中，Focus的得分不及Pro 15的得分。 Pro 15.尽管如此，Focus 15仍能跟上其他对比设备的步伐。

在CrossMark基准测试中，Focus 15的处理器速度稍快，这一点也很明显。评测样本的得分略高于Pro 15。CrossMark对显卡性能的考量远低于PCMark。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=167, last 2 years)	7777 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	7521 Points +9%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7273 Points +5%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7271 Points +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7210 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6926 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	6926 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6892 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6822 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	11549 Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	11458 Points +18%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11450 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=166, last 2 years)	10836 Points +11%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10573 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	10544 Points +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10180 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9726 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	9726 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	10510 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=166, last 2 years)	9880 Points +2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9744 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9674 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	9674 Points 0%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9435 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9390 Points -3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	9313 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	8578 Points -11%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=166, last 2 years)	12042 Points +26%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10333 Points +8%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9658 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9627 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9588 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9585 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	9585 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	9527 Points -1%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	8957 Points -7%

CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2114 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	2114 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1957 Points -7%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1930 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=150, last 2 years)	1901 Points -10%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1842 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1718 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1569 Points -26%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1550 Points -27%

CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1949 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1949 Points 0%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1877 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=150, last 2 years)	1803 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1798 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1793 Points -8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1653 Points -15%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1517 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1479 Points -24%

CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2384 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	2384 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2212 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=150, last 2 years)	2085 Points -13%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1995 Points -16%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1925 Points -19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1840 Points -23%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1709 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1691 Points -29%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1898 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1878 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1878 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1749 Points -7%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1725 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=150, last 2 years)	1701 Points -9%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1570 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1495 Points -20%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1231 Points -34%

PCMark 10 Score		6926 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	78081 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77899 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	76591 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21)	75033 MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71912 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=186, last 2 years)	64981 MB/s -17%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	61369 MB/s -21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	56560 MB/s -27%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48432 MB/s -38%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	84974 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	84877 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21)	82199 MB/s -3%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	79656 MB/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	69534 MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=186, last 2 years)	68750 MB/s -19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	65535 MB/s -23%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	62651 MB/s -26%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	49994 MB/s -41%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	92353 MB/s +21%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	88988 MB/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	76412 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	75215 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21)	73168 MB/s -4%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71966 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=186, last 2 years)	66789 MB/s -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	57505 MB/s -25%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	54997 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	106 ns * -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	97.5 ns * -15%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	94.9 ns * -12%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=186, last 2 years)	94.2 ns * -11%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	92.9 ns * -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21)	86.3 ns * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	85 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	84.1 ns * +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 ns * +3%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

我们通过各种浏览器标签、YouTube播放和Prime95进行的延迟测试表明，这款游戏笔记本的DPC延迟非常高。

在BIOS/UEFI和Windows之间建立连接的ACPI驱动程序在这里非常明显。UEFI更新并没有改善这一问题。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7213.9 μs * -188%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6692.6 μs * -167%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4545.9 μs * -81%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2504.7 μs *
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2089.1 μs * +17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	873.9 μs * +65%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

冽测试设备中的Crucial P5 Plus测试设备中的Crucial P5 Plus提供了良好的传输速度。然而，在长时间负载时，它显然会过热。

在我们对写入速度的长期测试中，NVMe固态硬盘的性能在一段时间后明显下降。

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8

Sequential Read: 4887.18MB/s

Sequential Write: 4286.27MB/s

4K Read: 58.79MB/s

4K Write: 169.41MB/s

4K-64 Read: 2146.9MB/s

4K-64 Write: 2546.59MB/s

Access Time Read: 0.052ms

Access Time Write: 0.025ms

Copy ISO: 4875.34MB/s

Copy Program: 1210.23MB/s

Copy Game: 2943.42MB/s

Score Read: 2712Points

Score Write: 3145Points

Score Total: 7213Points

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	97 pt
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	82.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	76.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	75.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	73.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	72.8 pt
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	71.3 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	54.4 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	36.5 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4537 (4515.8^min - 4536.98^max) MB/s +34%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	3972 (3827.09^min - 3972.22^max) MB/s +17%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=167, last 2 years)	3488 MB/s +3%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (2945 - 3972, n=4)	3456 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	3396 (3160.41^min - 3395.84^max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3005 (2951.71^min - 3004.87^max) MB/s -12%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2582 (2345.38^min - 2582.01^max) MB/s -24%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2291 (2271.71^min - 2290.75^max) MB/s -33%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1759 (1754.48^min - 1759.3^max) MB/s -48%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1759 (1754.48^min - 1759.3^max) MB/s -48%
seq write
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4564 (4538.66^min - 4564.03^max) MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4252 (3845.2^min - 4251.56^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4251 (4012.48^min - 4251.35^max) MB/s 0%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (2991 - 4252, n=4)	3864 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=167, last 2 years)	3801 MB/s -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3530 (3501.32^min - 3530^max) MB/s -17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2903 (2823.62^min - 2902.74^max) MB/s -32%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2236 (2165.59^min - 2236.4^max) MB/s -47%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1554 (1534.35^min - 1553.61^max) MB/s -63%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1554 (1534.35^min - 1553.61^max) MB/s -63%
seq q8 t1 read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7026 (6220.99^min - 7025.88^max) MB/s +6%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	6868 (5469.58^min - 6868.07^max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6677 (5800.93^min - 6677.12^max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6638 (5706.05^min - 6638.12^max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6601 (5818.24^min - 6601.01^max) MB/s -1%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (6520 - 6677, n=4)	6597 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=167, last 2 years)	6325 MB/s -5%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4556 (3742.64^min - 4556.27^max) MB/s -31%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3886 (3200.77^min - 3885.81^max) MB/s -41%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3886 (3200.77^min - 3885.81^max) MB/s -41%
seq q8 t1 write
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5254 (5116^min - 5253.79^max) MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	5004 (4799.12^min - 5003.59^max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4914 (4501.33^min - 4914.49^max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4886 (4877.24^min - 4885.61^max) MB/s -1%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (4562 - 5004, n=4)	4847 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=167, last 2 years)	4822 MB/s -2%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3742 (3596.76^min - 3741.95^max) MB/s -24%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3411 (3334.51^min - 3410.81^max) MB/s -31%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1640 (1630.54^min - 1639.84^max) MB/s -67%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1640 (1630.54^min - 1639.84^max) MB/s -67%
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	93.8 (92.89^min - 93.79^max) MB/s +48%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	77.9 (72.17^min - 77.89^max) MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=167, last 2 years)	65.9 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	64.8 (63.71^min - 64.77^max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	63.2 (62.77^min - 63.18^max) MB/s
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (49.8 - 64.8, n=4)	57.9 MB/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	53.1 (52.47^min - 53.13^max) MB/s -16%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.6 (32.27^min - 32.56^max) MB/s -48%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.6 (32.27^min - 32.56^max) MB/s -48%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	31.8 (31.24^min - 31.76^max) MB/s -50%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	313 (305.92^min - 312.76^max) MB/s +56%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	280 (275.43^min - 280.06^max) MB/s +39%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	267 (258.43^min - 266.75^max) MB/s +33%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=167, last 2 years)	222 MB/s +10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	214 (213.09^min - 214.01^max) MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	201 (197.55^min - 200.57^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	200 (196.37^min - 200.15^max) MB/s 0%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (119.3 - 205, n=4)	181.3 MB/s -10%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	129.5 (125.88^min - 129.52^max) MB/s -36%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	129.5 (125.88^min - 129.52^max) MB/s -36%
4k q32 t16 read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3650 (3141.55^min - 3649.99^max) MB/s +86%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3543 (3531.54^min - 3542.72^max) MB/s +80%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2852 (2785.11^min - 2852.4^max) MB/s +45%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=167, last 2 years)	2564 MB/s +31%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2518 (2508.69^min - 2518.06^max) MB/s +28%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (1350 - 2852, n=4)	2250 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1963 (1812.48^min - 1962.92^max) MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1678 (1211.7^min - 1678.15^max) MB/s -15%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	789 (769.77^min - 789.25^max) MB/s -60%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	789 (769.77^min - 789.25^max) MB/s -60%
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3594 (3143.37^min - 3593.51^max) MB/s +35%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3182 (2542.74^min - 3182.4^max) MB/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2659 (2629.9^min - 2658.76^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2654 (2528.72^min - 2653.61^max) MB/s 0%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (601 - 2664, n=4)	2145 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=167, last 2 years)	2112 MB/s -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2002 (1558.72^min - 2002.2^max) MB/s -25%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1509 MB/s -43%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	314 (293.25^min - 314.3^max) MB/s -88%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	314 (293.25^min - 314.3^max) MB/s -88%

AS SSD
Score Total
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8828 Points +22%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	8118 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	7213 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	7141 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=158, last 2 years)	6747 Points -6%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (5751 - 7213, n=4)	6506 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6430 Points -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4020 Points -44%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3315 Points -54%
Score Read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3356 Points +24%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3263 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2712 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2549 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2447 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=158, last 2 years)	2446 Points -10%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (1890 - 2712, n=4)	2436 Points -10%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1726 Points -36%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1116 Points -59%
Score Write
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3783 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3504 Points +11%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3205 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	3145 Points
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=158, last 2 years)	3115 Points -1%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (2602 - 3145, n=4)	2857 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2602 Points -17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1735 Points -45%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1456 Points -54%
Seq Read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5185 MB/s +6%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=158, last 2 years)	4945 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4887.18 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4685.43 MB/s -4%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4493.54 MB/s -8%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (3333 - 4887, n=4)	4097 MB/s -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3792 MB/s -22%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3466 MB/s -29%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	3333.37 MB/s -32%
Seq Write
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4526 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4286.27 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4062.33 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=158, last 2 years)	3726 MB/s -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3440.79 MB/s -20%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (2496 - 4286, n=4)	3398 MB/s -21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2772 MB/s -35%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2633.33 MB/s -39%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1295 MB/s -70%
4K Read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	89.2 MB/s +52%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	80.14 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=158, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	59.24 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	58.79 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	57.42 MB/s -2%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (49.3 - 59.2, n=4)	55.2 MB/s -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	51.2 MB/s -13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	30.4 MB/s -48%
4K Write
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	246 MB/s +45%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	225 MB/s +33%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=158, last 2 years)	212 MB/s +25%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	206.22 MB/s +22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	186.47 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	169.41 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	165.94 MB/s -2%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (149.1 - 177.9, n=4)	165.6 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	137.5 MB/s -19%
4K-64 Read
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2748 MB/s +28%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2733.5 MB/s +27%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2156.47 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2146.9 MB/s
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (1358 - 2205, n=4)	1967 MB/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1920.85 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=158, last 2 years)	1881 MB/s -12%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1296 MB/s -40%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	739 MB/s -66%
4K-64 Write
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3084 MB/s +21%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2973.32 MB/s +17%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2592.88 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2546.59 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=158, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s -1%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (2078 - 2608, n=4)	2351 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2172.75 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1468 MB/s -42%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	954 MB/s -63%
Access Time Read
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.079 ms * -52%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.061 ms * -17%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=157, last 2 years)	0.05525 ms * -6%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (0.03 - 0.085, n=4)	0.055 ms * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	0.053 ms * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	0.052 ms *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.039 ms * +25%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.029 ms * +44%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.018 ms * +65%
Access Time Write
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.139 ms * -456%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.108 ms * -332%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=158, last 2 years)	0.04855 ms * -94%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	0.025 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	0.024 ms * +4%
Average Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 (0.023 - 0.025, n=4)	0.024 ms * +4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.023 ms * +8%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.018 ms * +28%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.017 ms * +32%

* ... smaller is better

Disk throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8: Ø5260 (1672.91-6655)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8: Ø6581 (5718.09-6666.34)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø4012 (3504.22-4030.94)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4460 (3778.02-4582.76)

Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø2344 (298.22-7080.82)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ: Ø6485 (5652.89-6541.77)

Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø6770 (4434.37-6888.93)

显卡

在我们的Focus 15样品中，该图形芯片的性能比RTX 4060低约15%至20%。RTX 4060在专业版15.看看 Aorus 15X ASF还显示了Focus 15与RTX 4070组合的性能。 RTX 4070的性能。由于三款笔记本电脑的TGP值相当，因此当笔记本电脑配备相同的图形芯片时，性能应该相当。

Nvidia RTX 4050 GPU的额定TGP值高达140 W。该值处于Nvidia推荐的TGP配置的顶端。然而，这并没有给显卡带来任何在每项基准测试中都比其他游戏笔记本电脑更具优势。.

Focus 15可以通过Optimus和MUX开关直接选择图形芯片--酷睿i9的iGPU也可以使用。也就是说英特尔UHD Graphics 770配备32个EU在 13900HX是英特尔在当前处理器中提供的较弱的图形选项之一。因此，它只能执行基本任务。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	97.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	81.4 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	77.8 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	70.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	68.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	68.1 pt
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	53 pt
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	50.7 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	47.2 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=185, last 2 years)	43596 Points +41%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	36220 Points +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	31690 Points +3%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	30959 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	30877 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13339 - 32642, n=38)	28641 Points -7%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	24092 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	22469 Points -27%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	20485 Points -34%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=195, last 2 years)	31290 Points +39%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	26769 Points +19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	23443 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	22899 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	22480 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13591 - 24007, n=36)	21155 Points -6%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	17505 Points -22%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	17061 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	16174 Points -28%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=190, last 2 years)	13056 Points +51%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	10429 Points +21%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	8692 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	8626 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	8500 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (5107 - 9040, n=36)	7812 Points -9%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	6258 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	5859 Points -32%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	5675 Points -34%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	159354 Points +52%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)	143183 Points +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (51138 - 161152, n=25)	126416 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	122538 Points +17%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	105057 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	91970 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	65080 Points -38%

3DMark 11 Performance		27613 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		134251 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		52615 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		20964 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		9236 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender | V-Ray 5 Benchmark | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0 | Geekbench 6.3

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	34 Seconds *
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	34 Seconds *
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	31 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25 - 37, n=37)	28.8 Seconds *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	27 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	27 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	27 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	27 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	24 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=176, last 2 years)	21 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	62 Seconds *
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	61 Seconds *
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	57 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47 - 175, n=37)	56.2 Seconds *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	53 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	52 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	44 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=182, last 2 years)	36.6 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	586 Seconds *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	441 Seconds *
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	420 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (243 - 907, n=37)	395 Seconds *
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	386 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	376 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	376 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=190, last 2 years)	297 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	263 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	243 Seconds *

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=113, last 2 years)	2190 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	1744 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	1503 mpaths
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1465 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (618 - 1588, n=22)	1388 mpaths
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	1364 mpaths
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	1123 mpaths
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=115, last 2 years)	1574 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	1189 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	1079 mpaths
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1075 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (735 - 1174, n=22)	1033 mpaths
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	898 mpaths
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	858 mpaths

Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=192, last 2 years)	126097 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	106180 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	87670 Points
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	87554 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	86024 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (63538 - 90075, n=35)	82571 Points
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	77339 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	71151 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	70438 Points

Geekbench 6.0 - GPU OpenCL 6.0
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)	115603 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	93524 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	83483 Points
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	81622 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (66574 - 84452, n=12)	76353 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	69452 Points
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	69227 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	66944 Points
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	66574 Points

Geekbench 6.3 - GPU OpenCL
Average of class Gaming (4321 - 207373, n=109, last 2 years)	115663 Points
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	83663 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (60815 - 86892, n=18)	78987 Points

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

如前所述，图形处理器可由英特尔芯片或 Nvidia® RTX 4050 处理。英伟达GeForce RTX 4050.实际上，我们希望在所有基准测试中使用自动切换的双GPU模式。但是，自动选择并不是在所有情况下都能很好地工作。因此，我们的游戏基准测试仅在dGPU模式下运行。

在搭载RTX 4050的对比设备中，Focus 15的游戏性能最佳。除了TheWitcher 3 之外，RTX 4050在这里的帧数比平时略高。结果Dota 2 Reborn和 X-Plane 11可能看起来很明显。Focus 15在这两款游戏中的帧数均高于专业版15更强的 RTX 4060.

然而，这两款游戏现在更多受到CPU性能而非GPU性能的限制。当您比较 Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16与宏碁Swift Go.这两款设备均采用英特尔酷睿i7-13700H这两款设备均采用英特尔酷睿i7-13700H处理器，TDP值相近，在《Dota2重生》中的帧数也相近。

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	94.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) ^-1! Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	93.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	76.8 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	73.3 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66.2 pt
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	61.1 pt
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	55.8 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	50.4 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	20.1 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	159.7 fps +150%
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=167, last 2 years)	127.2 fps +99%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83 fps +30%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 (79^min, 80^P1) fps +28%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71 fps +11%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67.7 (63^min, 65^P1) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	64 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	60.1 (51^min) fps -6%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	59.5 (55^min, 55^P1) fps -7%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.3 fps -73%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=170, last 2 years)	113.1 fps +21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	107.2 (3.65^min, 71.4^P1) fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	93.7 (3.52^min, 58.8^P1) fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	92.2 (4.55^min, 55.6^P1) fps -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.5 (2.82^min, 58.8^P1) fps -11%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	74.3 (2.72^min, 47.6^P1) fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	65.3 (21.8^min, 35.7^P1) fps -30%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	60.6 (7.36^min, 25.6^P1) fps -35%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.9 (2.26^min, 6.17^P1) fps -88%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=183, last 2 years)	119.2 fps +40%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	85 fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.8 fps -3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	81.5 fps -4%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	65.1 fps -23%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	58.5 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	56.9 fps -33%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.7 fps -79%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=181, last 2 years)	227 fps +50%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	183.3 (43.8^min, 135^P1) fps +21%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	151.2 (35.6^min, 115.5^P1) fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	148.7 (20.2^min, 114.3^P1) fps -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	147 fps -3%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	117 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	103.9 (65^min, 77.7^P1) fps -31%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	100.2 (67.8^min, 76.1^P1) fps -34%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28.7 (5.6^min, 9.49^P1) fps -81%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	160.7 (136.8^min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	154.3 (130.7^min) fps -4%
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=189, last 2 years)	149.5 fps -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	142.5 (121.3^min) fps -11%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	129.1 (114^min) fps -20%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	123.9 (102.5^min) fps -23%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	115.8 (102.7^min) fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	73.5 (63.9^min) fps -54%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	61.7 (53.9^min) fps -62%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	117 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	111 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=195, last 2 years)	107.3 fps -8%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	98.2 fps -16%
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	97.6 fps -17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	97 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	79 fps -32%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77.8 fps -34%
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	70.7 fps -40%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	40.1 fps -66%

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	185.6		175.8	93.7
The Witcher 3 (2015)				64
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	193.2	181.6	175.8	160.7		106.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		114.1	85		58.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	165.2	144.9	117			108.6
Far Cry 5 (2018)		141	131	123	86
Strange Brigade (2018)	417	218	175.4	151.2
F1 22 (2022)	244	234	174.7	55.7
F1 23 (2023)	259	235	164.5	45.3	36.9

排放：温暖的右掌托

噪声排放

Focus 15的风扇噪音水平与游戏笔记本电脑相当。在15厘米距离处测得的噪音高达55 dB(A)，测试设备在性能模式下有时会发出令人不悦的噪音。

娱乐模式下的噪音值约为50 dB(A)。您还可以在睡眠模式下几乎无声地运行笔记本电脑，但会损失大量计算能力。

Noise Level

Idle		24 / 25.14 / 35.14 dB(A)
Load		55.93 / 56.34 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Noise		7%	20%	13%	1%	12%	6%
off / environment *	24	24 -0%	23.3 3%	24 -0%	24.8 -3%	25 -4%	24 -0%
Idle Minimum *	24	24 -0%	23.3 3%	24 -0%	28.2 -18%	26 -8%	24 -0%
Idle Average *	25.14	24 5%	23.3 7%	24 5%	31.8 -26%	27 -7%	24 5%
Idle Maximum *	35.14	24 32%	23.3 34%	24 32%	31.8 10%	28 20%	35.71 -2%
Load Average *	55.93	53.65 4%	29.6 47%	37.71 33%	38.2 32%	40 28%
Witcher 3 ultra *	54.62	53.53 2%	43 21%	45.75 16%	50 8%	39 29%	40.22 26%
Load Maximum *	56.34	53.65 5%	43 24%	54.55 3%	52.2 7%	41 27%	51.93 8%

* ... smaller is better

温度

这款游戏笔记本电脑的表面温度一点也不低。我们测得的热点温度为51 °C，但幸运的是，这些热点远离通常的触摸点。

不过，在使用过程中，笔记本电脑右侧掌托的温度也很高。由于您通常使用外接鼠标进行游戏，这对右手使用者来说可能不是什么大问题。左侧掌托和W、A、S、D键则保持凉爽。

即使安装的NVMe固态硬盘负载较长，似乎也足以使掌托的温度显著升高。当我们安装测试游戏时，掌托温度几乎达到46 °C。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


40 °C	51 °C	36 °C
39 °C	46 °C	39 °C
30 °C	33 °C	36 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 38.9 °C


42 °C	53 °C	49 °C
34 °C	44 °C	35 °C
32 °C	24 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 53 °C
Average: 37.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


25 °C	27 °C	26 °C
24 °C	29 °C	28 °C
21 °C	25 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 29 °C
Average: 25.8 °C


30 °C	29 °C	29 °C
29 °C	28 °C	22 °C
29 °C	23 °C	20 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Average: 26.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 23 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


37 °C	44 °C	40 °C
37 °C	40 °C	37 °C
26 °C	30 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 36.2 °C


40 °C	46 °C	42 °C
32 °C	32 °C	29 °C
28 °C	24 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 33.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).

	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Heat		-3%	9%	-8%	9%	18%	10%
Maximum Upper Side *	51	50 2%	48.9 4%	47 8%	46.4 9%	41 20%	42 18%
Maximum Bottom *	53	50 6%	44.6 16%	48 9%	49 8%	44 17%	52 2%
Idle Upper Side *	29	33 -14%	27.1 7%	35 -21%	26.5 9%	23 21%	26 10%
Idle Bottom *	30	32 -7%	27.5 8%	38 -27%	26.6 11%	26 13%	27 10%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

XMG Focus 15在高温下通过了Prime95和Furmark的压力测试，性能保持稳定。在升压阶段之后，我们无法确定CPU或GPU时钟是否下降。

相反，Core i9的温度相对较高，约为90 °C。然而，从压力测试的日志来看，我们不得不注意到申克所说的数值并没有长期保持。

在压力测试进行了大约10分钟后，CPU性能稳定在60 W左右，GPU功耗为100 W。

扬声器

Focus 15的扬声器能够较好地呈现中音和高音，但几乎没有低音。因此，Focus 15的音质要比Pro 15好一些。

如果板载扬声器似乎不够用，您可以使用通过蓝牙或3.5毫米插孔连接的外部设备。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.39 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.52 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理高能耗游戏笔记本电脑

能源消耗

申克XMG Focus 15对能量的渴求堪称一流。它配备了一个功率高达280 W的大型电源。

有趣的是，Focus 15的峰值负载消耗要高于Pro 15，因此电源的输出功率也得到了充分利用。

在外接显示器上运行时，笔记本电脑在压力测试中的能耗甚至稳定在280 W以上。使用内置显示器时，能耗在短时间内略有下降。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.06 / 1.3 Watt
Idle	11.4 / 16.7 / 25.8 Watt
Load	139 / 280 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, IPS, 2569x1440, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Swift X SFX14-71G i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5"	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16"	Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-39%	40%	41%	47%	64%	54%	25%	-0%
Idle Minimum *	11.4	21.6 -89%	8 30%	8.5 25%	8.4 26%	3 74%	7.4 35%	9.84 ?(2 - 21.1, n=30) 14%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=156, last 2 years) -18%
Idle Average *	16.7	29 -74%	12.1 28%	10.2 39%	11.5 31%	5 70%	8.3 50%	14.8 ?(5 - 32, n=30) 11%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=156, last 2 years) -13%
Idle Maximum *	25.8	42.7 -66%	12.5 52%	11.3 56%	11.9 54%	11 57%	8.7 66%	19.1 ?(7.9 - 33.9, n=30) 26%	26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=156, last 2 years) -4%
Load Average *	139	190 -37%	74.9 46%	84 40%	84.9 39%	72 48%	76 45%	87.9 ?(52.4 - 151, n=30) 37%	106.7 ?(32.1 - 201, n=154, last 2 years) 23%
Witcher 3 ultra *	265	189 29%	136.6 48%	128 52%	83.6 68%	69.7 74%	70 74%
Load Maximum *	280	269 4%	185 34%	189 32%	104.2 63%	108 61%	132 53%	179.6 ?(104.2 - 280, n=30) 36%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=156, last 2 years) 11%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø265 (247.89-312.51)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø188.8 (168.85-204.21)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø225 (193.43-280.44)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø215 (195.91-268.73)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø16.7 (7.552-41.912)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø29 (13.104-57.116)

Power consumption: External Monitor

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø150.6 (139.29-279.04)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø266 (254.05-270.59)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø136.3 (87.91-261.8)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø280 (274.94-286.3)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø244 (237.77-250.89)

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø28.9 (15.02-45.958)

电池寿命

在实际的Wi-Fi网上冲浪测试中，我们确定了近6小时的运行时间。因此，测试设备仅比普通游戏笔记本电脑少两分钟。

同时，游戏玩家可以在电池模式下获得更长的运行时间。不过，73 Wh的电池容量很快就会耗尽。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		5h 55min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 17min

	SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh	Acer Swift X SFX14-71G i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 63 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		23%	37%	-6%	-10%	50%	24%	9%
WiFi v1.3	355	343.1 -3%	701 97%	260 -27%	462 30%	576 62%	457 29%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=156, last 2 years) 6%
Load	77	115 49%	59 -23%	89 16%	39 -49%	106 38%	92 19%	85.4 ?(41 - 173, n=120, last 2 years) 11%
H.264			747	264	571	803		408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)
Reader / Idle						1093	678	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 强大的硬件

+ 240赫兹QHD显示屏

+ 多种端口选择

+ 多种配置和升级选项

Cons

- 高温和高容量

- 无USB-C PowerDelivery

- microSD读卡器速度慢

- 高能耗

结论：XMG抓住了游戏的本质

如果您想要一台15.6英寸的笔记本电脑，并配备申克或XMG当前的Nvidia GPU，您可以选择XMG Apex 15 Max和Focus以及Schenker Key和Media。冽 XMG Pro 15和XMG Focus 15在测试中的表现非常接近。

Focus 15侧重于基本功能。这款游戏笔记本电脑主要以高性能计算硬件取胜。英特尔英特尔酷睿i9-13900HX和英伟达GeForce RTX 4050工作在非常高的性能水平上。虽然这在基准测试中获得了很高的分数，但同时也导致了较高的表面温度、较响的风扇声以及较短的电池运行时间。华硕TUF A15.

至于机箱是否必须像Pro 15那样配备大量金属，或者是否可以由塑料制成，则是一个品味问题。从外观上看，Pro 15和Focus 15非常相似。不过，评测样品提供的连接性较差，缺少带Power Delivery的USB Type-C端口。

XMG Focus 15满足了游戏笔记本电脑的基本要求。由于配置选项众多，它可以满足用户的需求。

与Pro 15一样，Focus 15的缺点也不多。这是因为该笔记本电脑显示的所有缺点都是其价格和性能级别的典型缺点。

与其他廉价游戏笔记本电脑相比，如华硕 TUF A15 或微星 Katana 15 ，XMG Focus 极其强劲的酷睿 i9-13900HX 和良好的 QHD 屏幕都具有积极的意义。

价格和供货情况

XMG Focus 15可以在Bestware自由配置。有两种显示器可供选择，三种GPU可供选择，多种内存组合可供选择。在绝对基本的配置中，只有8GB工作内存，没有固态硬盘或Windows，入门级价格约为1,440欧元（约合1,618美元）。

对于配备全高清显示屏、16GB工作内存和1TB三星固态硬盘的配置，Bestware的价格约为1560欧元。我们的测试配置价格高出约300欧元。如果您打算全力以赴，选择最昂贵的组件，预计这款笔记本电脑的价格将超过3500欧元。

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) - 07/10/2023 v7 ^(old)
Marc Herter

Chassis

81 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

86%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

70 / 80 → 87%

Weight

60 / 10-66 → 90%

Battery

68 / 95 → 72%

Display

88%

Games Performance

92%

Application Performance

94%

Temperature

84 / 95 → 89%

Noise

63 / 90 → 70%

Audio

64%

Camera

47 / 85 → 55%

Average

76%

85%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 460014 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 申克 XMG Focus 15 (E23) 经济型游戏笔记本电脑评测：比Pro 15性能更强，价格更低

Marc Herter, 2023-07-17 (Update: 2023-07-17)

潜在的竞争对手比较

底盘坚固的塑料

尺寸比较

设备：三面USB接口

SD卡读卡器

通讯

网络摄像头

安全性

配件

维护

质保

Input devices: RGB keyboard

键盘

触摸板

显示屏QHD，240赫兹

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能：极致性能的酷睿i9处理器

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop Test

系统性能

DPC延迟

大容量存储器

Disk throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

显卡

游戏性能

排放：温暖的右掌托

噪声排放

温度

压力测试

扬声器

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 (E23) audio analysis

SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) audio analysis

电源管理高能耗游戏笔记本电脑

能源消耗

Power consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption: External Monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论：XMG抓住了游戏的本质

价格和供货情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison