联想 Yoga Slim 6 14 笔记本电脑评测：为 Radeon 740M 首映
一款配备 OLED 显示屏的全能型产品。
虽然 OLED 面板现已普及，但 Ryzen 5 7540U 却是相当罕见的标本。在我们的评测中，iGPU Radeon 740M 与速度更快的 AMD 型号和英特尔的竞争产品正面交锋。Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
判决
如果你对 GPU 性能没有特殊要求，联想 Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 几乎是一款全面的全能笔记本电脑，不会出现任何重大失误。相对经济实惠的 Ryzen 处理器被放置在时尚高档的机身中，配备了良好的输入设备和（仍然）足够数量的端口。如果该设备的主要用途是在室内，那么高对比度 OLED 屏幕的表现令人印象深刻，不过由于其表面反光性强，亮度略低于 400 cd/m²，亮度还可以再高一些。
排放和电池续航时间一般不会引起抱怨。Yoga Slim 6 运行起来既凉爽又安静。不过，纯粹从性价比的角度来看，这款 14 英寸的设备在与一些竞争对手的竞争中显得有些力不从心。不出所料，Ryzen 5 7540U 内置的 Radeon 740M 通常明显落后于 Radeon 760M 或 780M，也落后于英特尔 Arc 7 和 Arc 8，而英特尔 Arc 7 和 Arc 8 在同样昂贵的机器中也能找到。因此，休闲游戏玩家，尤其是休闲游戏玩家，最好选择该公司自己的 IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在测试期间，配备 Ryzen 5 7540U、Radeon 740 M 和 OLED 显示屏的联想 Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 目前在亚马逊和百思买均无货。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Geizhals | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 83.9%  | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 AMD Ryzen 5 7540U ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 1.4 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
2. 87.4% v7 (old)  | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 760M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Listenpreis 1200 EUR | 1.5 kg | 20 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
3. 88.1% v7 (old)  | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Listenpreis 949€ Geizhals Suche | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
4. 89.2%  | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Intel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | 1.4 kg | 17.5 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
5. 86.6% v7 (old)  | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H ⎘ Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
我们的 14APU8 评测机型配备了上述 Ryzen 5 7540U、16 GB 焊接 LPDDR5-6400 内存和 2242 格式 1 TB M.2 SSD。OLED 显示屏的分辨率为 1920 x 1200 像素，支持 HDR，指定频率为 60 Hz。操作系统为 Windows 11 Home。
规格
案例
Slim 6 的外观与 Yoga 系列的其他设备相似。联想采用了引人注目的设计，在任何环境、任何场合都能展现出良好的形象。由于使用了金属材质，机身给人一种非常高级的感觉，而且具有良好的稳定性（只有底座的中间区域在按压时会有轻微的晃动）。在制造质量方面无可挑剔。
另外一个亮点是 180° 的大开启角度。铰链设置得相当牢固，但仍可单手开启。1.3 公斤多一点的重量也确保了良好的运输性能。此外，该设备的厚度仅为 1.5 厘米，外观非常纤薄。
特点
接口
联想为这款 14 英寸笔记本电脑配备了两个 USB-C 端口（包括 DisplayPort 和 PowerDelivery，其中一个是 USB 4）和一个 USB-A 端口。此外，还有一个 HDMI 2.1 输出端口和一个组合音频插孔。买家将不得不放弃以太网端口和读卡器。不过，由于所有端口都在机箱后部，因此使用鼠标易如反掌。
交流
Slim 6 的无线通信由 Realtek 芯片（RTL8852CE）负责。它能提供稳定、良好但并不出众的效果（我们的测量是在距离参考路由器 1 米的距离上进行的）。
网络摄像头
全高清网络摄像头的色彩准确度和图像锐利度比一些通常只配备 720p 网络摄像头的竞争设备要好一些，因此往往能提供标准的效果。顶部：联想配备了实体快门。
配件
笔记本电脑附带了几本信息手册和令人愉悦的 65 瓦轻巧电源。
维护
机箱底部由六颗 Torx 螺钉和一些非常紧的夹具固定，这使得打开机箱成为一项真正的挑战。机箱内部有两个风扇，每个风扇都有一根热管与 CPU 相连。内存是板载的，这意味着既不能更换也不能升级。固态硬盘可以更换为更大的型号（最大型号为 2280）。如果有第二个 M.2 插槽就更实用了。
可持续性
可持续性可归类为中档。虽然联想在笔记本电脑包装上使用了塑料薄膜和两块泡沫塑料插片，但它们至少都贴有相应的标签。根据制造商的网站，笔记本电脑和 PSU 在一定程度上是由可回收材料制成的。
保修
保修期为 24 个月。
输入设备
键盘
正如你对联想设备的期望一样，该机的键盘具有良好的血统。弧形按键大多排列合理，提供了相当不错的输入体验。当然，键盘上还有多级可调灯光，而且是白色的。
触摸板
触摸板的大小约为 12 x 7.5 厘米，与竞争对手相比也毫不逊色。就我们的口味而言，这块触摸板听起来有点轻飘飘的，不过，尽管如此，输入的记录还是很可靠的。此外，触摸板表面光滑，支持手势操作。总之，输入设备令人印象深刻。
显示屏
OLED 显示屏具有与该技术相关的一般优缺点。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 391 cd/m²
Contrast: 19550:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.79
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.204
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 Lenovo LEN140WUXGA (LEN88AC), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A CMN1435, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 LENOVO LEN140WUXGA (LEN88AC), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -20% | 1% | -1% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 68.7 -31% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98.2 -2% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97 | 70.8 -27% | 98.9 2% | 94.8 -2% | 96.7 0% |
| Response Times | -2957% | 17% | -476% | -14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.4 ? | 56.2 ? -3914% | 0.61 ? 56% | 10.8 ? -671% | 1.3 ? 7% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1.2 ? | 25.2 ? -2000% | 0.67 ? 44% | 9.37 ? -681% | 1.2 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency | 480 ? | 240 ? -50% | 120 ? -75% | 240 -50% | |
| Screen | -148% | -17% | -24% | -2% | |
| Brightness middle | 391 | 397 2% | 411 5% | 366 -6% | 392 0% |
| Brightness | 386 | 367 -5% | 414 7% | 368 -5% | 388 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 86 -9% | 99 4% | 98 3% | 97 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.02 | 0.25 -1150% | 0.02 -0% | ||
| Contrast | 19550 | 1588 -92% | 19600 0% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.89 | 2.35 -24% | 2.8 -48% | 2.74 -45% | 1.75 7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.43 | 4.68 -6% | 5.5 -24% | 4.37 1% | 4.46 -1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.79 | 1.15 36% | 2.2 -23% | 1.48 17% | 1.59 11% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 2.4 -85% | 1.8 -38% | 3 -131% | 1.8 -38% |
| Gamma | 2.204 100% | 2.067 106% | 2.21 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.249 98% |
| CCT | 6411 101% | 6409 101% | 6319 103% | 6146 106% | 6574 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1042% /
-522% | 0% /
-5% | -167% /
-123% | -5% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
虽然对比度、黑度和响应时间都非常令人信服，但买家仍然不得不忍受偶尔的闪烁（480 Hz）以及反光的显示表面。在户外使用时，亮度还可以再高一些：略低于 400 cd/m² 的亮度在强光下只能算一般。
在色彩准确度方面，几乎没有什么可抱怨的。在这方面，Yoga Slim 6 的表现相当出色。
色彩空间也是如此：100 % sRGB 和 DCI-P3 达到了令人满意的 97 % AdobeRGB。作为 OLED 显示屏的典型代表，可视角度也达到了很好的水平。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz |  | |
| ≤ 86 cd/m² brightness | |||
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 86 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. Flickering occurs at relatively low brightness settings, so extended use at this brightness setting or lower can cause eyestrain. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
虽然 Yoga Slim 6 的 CPU 性能可以用中端来形容，但 GPU 性能只能算入门级。16 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘是该价位产品的典型配置。
测试条件
预装的联想 Vantage 软件包括三种不同的节能模式，它们都会影响风扇的噪音和转速。我们的测量基于默认的 "自适应 "模式，该模式在性能和噪音之间保持了合理的平衡。
| 赛博朋克 2077 (FHD/Ultra) | 省电模式 | 自适应（自动） | 性能 |
| 噪音 | 32 dB(A) | 37 dB(A) | 42 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 8fps | 10fps | 1fps |
| PL1 (HWiNFO) | 20 W | 22 W | 43 W |
| PL2 (HWiNFO) | 43 W | 53 W | 53 W |
处理器
......（英文 Ryzen 5 7540U是凤凰一代（4 纳米）六核处理器，拥有 16 MB 三级缓存，可通过 SMT 同时处理多达 12 个线程。AMD 规定负载下的时钟速度在 3.2 至 4.9 GHz 之间。在基准测试过程中，Yoga Slim 6 虽然没有达到很高的水平，但在执行日常任务时仍然取得了不错的成绩。在我们的 CPU 评级中，7540U 的性能介于 酷睿至尊 5 125U和 酷睿至尊 5 125H之间，并倾向于后者。不过，Slim 6 的性能并不完全像我们的 Cinebench 循环所显示的那样稳定。在极端情况下，结果会出现近 200 点的波动。
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U () | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U () | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U () | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U () | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U () | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
系统性能
系统性能排名大致基于 CPU 排名，在 PCMark 10 中超过 6000 分绝不是一个坏成绩。从主观上看，无论是开机时间、加载时间还是数据传输，电脑的运行速度也令人愉悦。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U, AMD Radeon 740M () | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U, AMD Radeon 740M () | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U, AMD Radeon 740M () | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U, AMD Radeon 740M () | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U, AMD Radeon 740M () | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U, AMD Radeon 740M () | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=66, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6025 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U () | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U () | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U () | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117898, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 7540U () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
相比之下，延迟就不那么完美了。LatencyMon 工具显示，实时音频和视频编辑可能存在问题，但这可能只影响有特殊要求的用户。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
在大容量存储方面，联想在机箱中安装了一个 1 TB Micron NVMe 硬盘，速度既不特别慢，也不特别快。与 CPU 不同，SSD 的性能非常稳定。DiskSpd 循环运行时，性能没有任何下降，而 Slim 5 却不是这样。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
与极为流行和成功的 iGPU 相比 Radeon 780M的 Radeon 740M必须使用 256 个而非 768 个着色器单元，换句话说，只有后者的三分之一。幸运的是，速度并没有完全下降，尽管如此，还是存在相当大的差异和差距。如果同时进行 3DMark 合成测试，Radeon 740M 的平均运行速度比 Radeon 780M 和英特尔 弧 7和英特尔 Arc 7 相比，平均要慢约 20%。 Radeon 760M(512 着色器）。不过，英特尔 图形 4 核心被击败了几个百分点。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 30556 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 24621 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7892 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 133390 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22310 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4681 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1909 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 -1! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A -1! | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU -2! | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (12.1 - 31.1, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (17.8 - 55.2, n=36, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 740M () | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13.8 - 43.7, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 740M () | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 36.6, n=34, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 740M () | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU | |
我们使用了 赛博朋克 2077(FHD/Ultra）来分析 3D 性能在较长时间内的表现。结果：开始时性能略有下降，之后帧数保持相当稳定。
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 133.1 | 118 | 44.8 | 18.5 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 116.7 | 103.1 | 68.2 | 58.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 50.7 | 23.5 | 17.6 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 36.3 | 25.1 | 20.7 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 126.8 | 46.6 | 36.9 | 30.3 |
| Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 22.2 | 16.5 | 12.8 | 9.94 |
| Returnal (2023) | 18 | 17 | 14 | 11 |
| Atomic Heart (2023) | 31 | 22.8 | 13.1 | 12.9 |
| Company of Heroes 3 (2023) | 37.1 | 29.4 | 22.8 | 22.6 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023) | 17.9 | 13.5 | 11.4 | |
| Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) | 18.5 | |||
| Atlas Fallen (2023) | 22.9 | 21.4 | 19.2 | 14.8 |
| Armored Core 6 (2023) | 33.3 | 25.1 | 22.5 | 17.8 |
| The Crew Motorfest (2023) | 22 | 20 | 16 | 13 |
| Lies of P (2023) | 27.3 | 23.7 | 20.1 | 19 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 21.7 | 16.4 | 13.5 | 12.8 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 20.5 | 16 | 13.3 | 10.4 |
| Counter-Strike 2 (2023) | 72.7 | 59.9 | 30.1 | 20.9 |
| Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 28 | 23 | 22 | 16 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 58.2 | 41.1 | 22 | 16.7 |
| Lords of the Fallen (2023) | 13.9 | 12.8 | 10 | 7.65 |
| Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 11 | 9.31 | 8.49 | |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 9.5 | 8.5 | 7.1 | 6.9 |
| The Finals (2023) | 32.9 | 29.6 | 25.8 | 19.5 |
| Ready or Not (2023) | 34.3 | 27.3 | 18.2 | 11.1 |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 129.5 | 93.1 | 87.4 | |
| Palworld (2024) | 42 | 35.2 | 17.3 | 15.4 |
| Enshrouded (2024) | 11.4 | 10.5 | 8.34 | 5.79 |
| Helldivers 2 (2024) | 19.2 | 14.7 | 12.9 | 12.3 |
| Last Epoch (2024) | 38.8 | 32.1 | 25.1 | 16.7 |
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 18.1 | 15.4 | 11 | 10.6 |
| Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) | 12.3 | 11.5 | ||
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 18.5 | 15.7 | 12.9 | 9.53 |
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 8.06 | 7.96 | 5.77 | |
| F1 24 (2024) | 41 | 35 | 24 | 2 |
| The First Descendant (2024) | 30.6 | 18.4 | 13.6 | 11.5 |
| Once Human (2024) | 24.7 | 17.9 | 13.4 | 12.4 |
| Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 7.04 | 6.35 | 4.86 | 3.92 |
| Space Marine 2 (2024) | 13.7 | 10.4 | 9.71 | 8.78 |
| Final Fantasy XVI (2024) | 10.1 | 9.63 | 8.89 | 7.82 |
| God of War Ragnarök (2024) | 19.9 | 14.3 | 11.9 | 10.5 |
| Until Dawn (2024) | 23.9 | 15.3 | 9.82 | 6.94 |
排放量
噪音排放
在自适应自动模式下，Yoga Slim 6 的声音不会太大。在负载情况下，大约 37 分贝（A）的声音清晰可闻，但对于大多数用户来说，这应该是可以接受的，尤其是考虑到大多数同类设备在这方面的声音更大。在空闲运行以及执行基本的办公、视频和上网任务时，风扇要么完全关闭，要么以 27 至 29 分贝（A）的音量运行（仍然），令人愉快地接受。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 27 / 29 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 37 / 38 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -1% | 8% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 24 | 25 -4% | 23.9 -0% | 21.38 11% | 24 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 25 -0% | 23.9 4% | 25.18 -1% | 25 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 27 | 26 4% | 23.9 11% | 25.18 7% | 26 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29 | 27 7% | 23.9 18% | 25.18 13% | 31 -7% |
| Load Average * | 37 | 45 -22% | 44.3 -20% | 34.37 7% | 43 -16% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 37 | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 38 | 46 -21% | 44.3 -17% | 34.38 10% | 45 -18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 | 41.3 | 37 | 40 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
虽然在满载情况下机箱顶部的温度不会超过 40 °C，但我们在底座上记录到的温度略高。不过，它们仍处于合理水平。在空闲状态下，整个机箱的温度保持在 30 °C以下，非常凉爽。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.7 °C / -1.3 F).
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -5% | 10% | -1% | 0% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 39 | 50 -28% | 39.6 -2% | 39.4 -1% | 43 -10% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 46 | 51 -11% | 38.6 16% | 45.2 2% | 48 -4% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 25 11% | 24.8 11% | 29 -4% | 26 7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29 | 27 7% | 25.3 13% | 29.4 -1% | 27 7% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试中，CPU 跳频至 2.1 GHz 左右，但温度仅升至 50 至 60 °C。在赛博朋克测试中，时钟速度和温度值相似。
发言人
2.0 系统产生的音效在同类产品中处于中等水平。虽然高音和中音相当不错，但低音仍有很大的提升空间。最大音量为 81 dB(A)。
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
在空闲模式下，功耗为 5 至 10 瓦（平均为 6 瓦）。在负载模式下，我们的测量设备记录的功耗值在 41 瓦到 58 瓦之间，考虑到其性能，这样的功耗是合理的。随附的 65 瓦 PSU 足够大。
| Off / Standby | 0.5 / 0.7 Watt |
| Idle | 5 / 6 / 10 Watt |
| Load |
41 / 58 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 8% | -23% | 27% | -29% | -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5 | 3 40% | 5.3 -6% | 3.54 29% | 5 -0% | 4.44 ? 11% |
| Idle Average * | 6 | 4 33% | 7.2 -20% | 4.66 22% | 8 -33% | 7.55 ? -26% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10 | 8 20% | 7.5 25% | 6.38 36% | 16 -60% | 9.45 ? 5% |
| Load Average * | 41 | 56 -37% | 65.6 -60% | 28.2 31% | 53 -29% | 45.8 ? -12% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 42.5 | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 58 | 66 -14% | 89.6 -54% | 46.9 19% | 70 -21% | 68.4 ? -18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 58.2 | 73 | 27.4 | 47.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
电池寿命
电池续航时间也令人印象深刻，但不属于顶级表现。在亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 的情况下，Wi-Fi 上网时间不到 10 小时，应该能让大多数用户满意。尽管惠普 ZBook Firefly 14 G10 的电池容量较小（51 Wh 对 60 Wh），但事实证明它的电池续航时间特别长。
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M, 60 Wh | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G10 A R5 PRO 7640HS, Radeon 760M, 51 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 14-fc0078TU Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 59 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, 57 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 33% | 20% | 3% | -8% | 23% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 590 | 782 33% | 710 20% | 605 3% | 544 -8% | 726 ? 23% |
| H.264 | 1031 | 810 | 911 ? | |||
| Load | 110 | 115.4 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
配备 Ryzen 5 7540U 的联想 Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 是一款优质、小巧、轻便的全能笔记本电脑。
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8
- 10/18/2024 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
