Notebookcheck Logo

华硕 Zenbook 14 OLED 评测 - AMD 版 Zenbook 配备了较弱的 1080p OLED 屏幕

比英特尔更好？

华硕还推出了搭载 AMD Ryzen 8000 处理器的廉价版 Zenbook 14 OLED，其性能甚至优于流星湖版。不过，它在内存和全高清 OLED 面板（刷新率仅为 60 赫兹）方面受到了限制。
AMD Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook Windows Zen 4

我们已经 测试过目前的华硕 Zenbook 14 OLED 配备了英特尔新款 Meteor Lake 处理器和刷新率为 120 Hz 的 2.8K OLED 屏幕，现在华硕又在宣传一款配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘，售价 1199 美元。不过，根据我们的信息，AMD 型号无法配备 32 GB 内存或高分辨率 OLED 屏幕。

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA (ZenBook 14 UM3000 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS 8 x 3.3 - 5.1 GHz, 32 W PL2 / Short Burst, 27 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon 780M, Core: 2100 MHz, RAM: 1367 MHz, Adrenalin 23.20.42
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x-7467, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 162 PPI, 3.5mm, ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, 1024 GB 
, 903 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Brightness Sensor
Networking
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 14.9 x 312.4 x 220.1
Battery
75 Wh, 4825 mAh Lithium-Ion, 4-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65W PSU, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.219 kg, Power Supply: 226 g
Price
1199 Euro
Amazon
$839.99
Links
Asus homepage
Asus notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.6 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M		1.2 kg14.9 mm14.00"1920x1200
87.4 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core		1.2 kg11.6 mm14.00"2880x1800
88.1 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M		1.5 kg16 mm14.00"2880x1800
86.7 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core		1.2 kg14.9 mm14.00"2880x1800
89 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M		1.4 kg18 mm14.00"2880x1800

v (old)
12 / 2023
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core		1.3 kg14.9 mm14.00"2880x1800

机箱 - AMD Zenbook（黑色

两款 Zenbook 14 的外壳设计几乎完全相同，但 AMD 版本只有黑色（翡翠黑）。在它的盖子上，你会发现一个非常低调的 Pro Art 徽标和小的 Zenbook 字样，它们也被放置在笔记本的显示屏下方。不过，制造商放弃了其他任何设计元素（除了一些彩色广告贴纸），总的来说，新款 Zenbook 的设计非常简约。与深蓝色的英特尔机型一样，黑色表面上的指纹也是个大问题，我们在测试过程中也很难保持清洁。屏幕边框非常窄，但底部边缘尤其宽。

在操作该设备时，有一点是非常明显的，那就是它非常轻巧（1.21 千克）。不过，由于采用了金属结构，它的稳定性仍然很好，我们无法从它身上听到任何嘎吱嘎吱的声音。键盘的中间部分在受到较大压力时确实会有一点变形，但这在日常使用中应该不成问题。显示屏盖也很稳定，我们喜欢它的铰链设置。单手就能轻松打开盖子，而且完全不会摇晃。其最大开启角度为 180 度。

与 Galaxy Book4 Pro在我们的对比组中，Zenbook 是最轻的机型，但在机身厚度方面，三星仍有明显优势。不过，Zenbook 可以轻松放入任何背包，不会占用太多空间。65 瓦插入式电源的重量增加了 226 克。

尺寸比较

❌
313 mm 222 mm 18 mm 1.4 kg312 mm 221 mm 16 mm 1.5 kg312.9 mm 217.9 mm 14.9 mm 1.3 kg312.4 mm 220.1 mm 14.9 mm 1.2 kg312.4 mm 220.1 mm 14.9 mm 1.2 kg312.3 mm 223.8 mm 11.6 mm 1.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - USB-C 4.0 而非 Thunderbolt 4

其连接方式与英特尔机型基本相同，但不支持 Thunderbolt。华硕似乎在这方面偷工减料，两个 USB-C 端口中只有一个支持 4.0 标准。不过，在实际使用中，这应该不成问题，而且由于有普通的 USB-A 端口和 HDMI 输出，日常使用中也不需要经常使用适配器。如果能在左侧增加一个 USB-C 端口，就能方便地从两侧为设备充电。

左：USB-A 3.2 Gen 1
左：USB-A 3.2 Gen 1
右侧USB-C 3.2 Gen 2（10 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery）、带 Thunderbolt 4 的 USB-C 4.0（40 GBit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery）、3.5 毫米音频、HDMI 2.1
右侧USB-C 3.2 Gen 2（10 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery）、带 Thunderbolt 4 的 USB-C 4.0（40 GBit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery）、3.5 毫米音频、HDMI 2.1

交流

AMD 型号的 Zenbook 14 OLED 采用联发科的 Wi-Fi 模块，支持 Wi-Fi 6E 标准和蓝牙 5.3。在我们使用华硕参考路由器进行的测试中，其传输速率非常稳定，1.7-1.8 GBit/s 的传输速率甚至略快于英特尔机型。 英特尔型号-尽管这种差异在实际使用中并不明显。它没有 Wi-Fi 7 模块。

Networking
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1737 (min: 1638) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1712 (min: 1684) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1645 (min: 1487) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1556 (min: 1430) MBit/s ∼91%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
MediaTek RZ616
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1746 (min: 1647) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1706 (min: 1678) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1638 (min: 1574) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1654 (min: 1582) MBit/s ∼97%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
MediaTek RZ608
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
943 (min: 884) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
949 (min: 932) MBit/s ∼55%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1319 (min: 961) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1441 (min: 726) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1569 (min: 1027) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1742 (min: 1441) MBit/s ∼100%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1737 (1638-1850)
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1638 (1574-1682)
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1712 (1684-1729)
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1654 (1582-1688)

网络摄像头

华硕在笔记本电脑的显示屏上部边框安装了一个 1080p 网络摄像头，可提供不错的图像质量。与英特尔机型一样，由于 AMD 芯片也配备了 NPU，因此工作室特效（柔焦、眼神接触、跟踪）直接集成到了操作系统中。此外，它还有一个机械快门和一个红外摄像头，可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。

ColorChecker
9.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
13 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA: 9.09 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 19.93 ∆E

维护

底盖用几颗 Torx 螺钉（T5）固定，可以轻松取下。笔记本电脑的内部结构与英特尔机型有许多相似之处，包括单风扇。不过，固态硬盘的位置发生了变化。无线局域网模块和内存也都焊接在 AMD Zenbook 内部。

内部建设
内部建设
焊接式无线局域网模块
焊接式无线局域网模块
可插拔 M.2 2280 固态硬盘
可插拔 M.2 2280 固态硬盘

输入设备 - 1.4 毫米按键升降器

键盘的键程为 1.4 毫米，没有任何惊喜。键入舒适而精确，只是较大的按键声音稍大。总的来说，这是一款不错的键盘。不过，它的布局并不理想，因为方向键相当小，而且只有一个单行回车键。白色背光有三个强度级别，可通过亮度传感器自动激活或关闭。

点击板（13 x 7.5 厘米）非常平滑，我们在操作过程中没有发现任何问题。下半部分可以向下按，但会发出响亮的咔嗒声。与价格更高的英特尔机型相比， AMD Zenbook 没有提供虚拟数字键盘。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘背光
键盘背光

显示屏 - 全高清 OLED 显示屏，刷新率为 60 赫兹

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

与配备 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H 的 Zenbook 14 OLED 基本型号一样，AMD 型号也配备了不带触摸功能的 OLED 屏幕，但分辨率较低，仅为 1,920 x 1,200 像素，刷新率为 60 Hz。分辨率其实不是问题，因为所有内容看起来都足够清晰，色彩也非常鲜艳。相比之下，60 Hz 的较低刷新率在显示有动作的内容时会很明显，特别是如果你习惯使用速度更快的面板。另一个问题是它的表面反射率很高，在室内也会造成一些问题。它的响应时间非常快，这也是 OLED 的典型特点，而且我们没有发现背光出血现象。

两种面板的亮度没有差别，因为 1200p OLED 在 SDR 模式下也能达到略低于 390 cd/m² 的亮度。再加上其较低的黑度，从而实现了出色的对比度。在 HDR 模式下，我们测得的最高亮度为 643 cd/m²（显示图像部分）和 615 cd/m²（显示几乎全白的图像）。

391
cd/m²		387
cd/m²		383
cd/m²
387
cd/m²		387
cd/m²		385
cd/m²
383
cd/m²		385
cd/m²		387
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA40CT02-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 391 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 386.1 cd/m² Minimum: 8.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 387 cd/m²
Contrast: 38700:1 (Black: 0.01 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14"		Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
ATNA40CU07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
ATNA40CU06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"		Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"
Display
-1%
5%
4%
-15%
5%
Display P3 Coverage
98.6
97
-2%
99.9
1%
99.8
1%
71.1
-28%
99.75
1%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
98.7
-1%
99.99
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
87.3
85.2
-2%
98.9
13%
97.6
12%
73.2
-16%
98.56
13%
Response Times
10%
16%
29%
-2309%
-357%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
1.31 ?(0.69, 0.62)
0.83 ?(0.43, 0.4)
37%
0.61 ?(0.31, 0.3)
53%
0.69 ?(0.37, 0.32)
47%
37.9 ?(17.4, 20.5)
-2793%
2.2 ?(1, 1.2)
-68%
Response Time Black / White *
1.2 ?(0.61, 0.59)
0.69 ?(0.38, 0.31)
42%
0.67 ?(0.34, 0.33)
44%
0.71 ?(0.38, 0.33)
41%
23.1 ?(11.4, 11.7)
-1825%
12.8 ?(11.8, 1)
-967%
PWM Frequency
480 ?(99)
240 ?(100)
-50%
240 ?(99)
-50%
480 ?(80)
0%
300
-37%
Screen
-21%
-54%
-19%
-229%
-159%
Brightness middle
387
392
1%
411
6%
391
1%
340
-12%
388
0%
Brightness
386
398
3%
414
7%
392
2%
338
-12%
391
1%
Brightness Distribution
98
97
-1%
99
1%
98
0%
84
-14%
98
0%
Black Level *
0.01
0.02
-100%
0.16
-1500%
0.0411
-311%
Contrast
38700
19550
-49%
2125
-95%
9440
-76%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.3
-30%
2.8
-180%
1.1
-10%
1.7
-70%
6.32
-532%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.4
3.2
-33%
5.5
-129%
2.4
-0%
3
-25%
8.82
-268%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
2.3
-64%
1.8
-29%
1.3
7%
2.9
-107%
2.61
-86%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.24 98%
2.21 100%
2.17 101%
2.22 99%
1.772 124%
CCT
6466 101%
6517 100%
6319 103%
6336 103%
6729 97%
6202 105%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.2
1.3
4.79
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / -8%
-11% / -22%
5% / -3%
-851% / -500%
-170% / -166%

* ... smaller is better

我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了测量，正如华硕目前所有的 OLED 机型一样，用户可以选择不同的配置文件。默认情况下激活的是 "原生"配置文件，它已经显示出准确的灰度，但色彩有些过饱和。我们在对比表中使用的P3模式在这方面的表现要好得多。灰度和色彩都远远低于 3 的重要偏差，而且我们没有测出任何色调。

CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：原生，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：原生，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：原生，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：原生，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：原生，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：原生，目标色彩空间：P3）

因此，我们没有必要对显示器进行校准，而且使用我们自己的校准，我们也无法改善其显示效果，这意味着我们不会提供我们的配置文件供下载。如果你喜欢编辑照片，那么你一定会对它极为精确的 sRGB 模式感到满意。

CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
对比 AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.61 ms rise
↘ 0.59 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.69 ms rise
↘ 0.62 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 480 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

PWM (0 % 亮度)
PWM (0 % 亮度)
PWM (20 % 亮度)
PWM (20 % 亮度)
PWM (40 % 亮度)
PWM (40 % 亮度)
PWM (60 % 亮度)
PWM (60 % 亮度)
PWM (80 % 亮度)
PWM (80 % 亮度)
PWM (100 % 亮度)
PWM (100 % 亮度)

如果屏幕亮度设置为 80% 或更低，OLED 面板会以 480 Hz 的频率进行 PWM 闪烁。反过来，华硕在其 MyAsus 软件中提供了所谓的无闪烁 OLED 调光设置，您也可以使用它来调暗显示屏。

室外
室外
在阳光下
在阳光下

OLED 面板非常容易反光，即使其亮度和高对比度有很大帮助，但即使在阴天，反光仍然是个问题。除了在平面角度下 OLED 通常会闪烁蓝色光泽外，其可视角度没有任何问题。

视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - Ryzen 8000 Hawk Point

 
 

测试条件

华硕在其 MyAsus 应用程序中提供了多种能源配置文件，除了预设的标准模式外，还有耳语模式和性能模式。我们在下表列出了相应的 TDP 值。不过，性能模式只有在连接电源时才能使用，而由此带来的性能提升并不能证明风扇噪音的大幅增加是合理的，因此我们在标准模式下进行了以下基准测试和测量。不过，在日常使用中，您无疑可以使用耳语模式，享受更安静的风扇。

能源概况 TDP CB R23 Multi Time Spy 图形 最大风扇噪音排放
Whisper 25 瓦 12,445 分 2,503 分 33 分贝(A)
标准 32 -> 27 瓦 13,888 点 2,876 点 42.2 dB(A)
性能 51 -> 41 瓦 15,013 分 2,838 分 50.9 分贝(A)

处理器 - Ryzen 7 8840HS

餈 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS配备 8 个快速 Zen 4 内核，最高主频可达 5.1 GHz。AMD 处理器的最大功耗为 32 瓦，明显低于 AMD 型号（最大功耗为 64 瓦），但英特尔型号只能在短时间内保持这一数值。在简短的基准测试中，两款机型的性能相差不大，但 AMD Zenbook 的一大优势是，即使在长时间负载的情况下，其性能也能保持稳定。与 Tuxedo Pulse 14(Ryzen 7 8840HS）和 联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14(Ryzen 7 8845HS）相比，其最大多核性能略低，但这是由于其功耗限制较低。不过，在使用可选的性能模式时，Zenbook 与配备了 酷睿至尊 7 155H.

在电池模式下，它的最大功耗没有那么高，只有 28 瓦，这就是为什么它的多核性能降低了约 8%。更多 CPU 基准测试请参见 我们的技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0130260390520650780910104011701300143015601690182019502080221023402470Tooltip
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø2166 (2149.96-2176.16)
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1454 (1146.23-2135.5)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2535 (2513.19-2555.42)
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H; Standard mode: Ø1477 (1223.99-2297.13)
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2424 (2389.2-2482.31)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2151 (2090.3-2474.79)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
84.3 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
83.5 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
78.4 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
 
77.7 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
76.6 pt
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
75.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68.7 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
67.7 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
15889 Points +14%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
15515 Points +12%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
15043 Points +8%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
13888 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (12720 - 14621, n=5)
13674 Points -2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12794 Points -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1555 - 21812, n=62, last 2 years)
11696 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
11428 Points -18%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1779 Points +2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1776 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1772 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
1746 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (1712 - 1746, n=5)
1732 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1716 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (358 - 2001, n=62, last 2 years)
1672 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1664 Points -5%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6231 Points +15%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6061 Points +12%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
5414 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (4854 - 5760, n=5)
5316 Points -2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5169 Points -5%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5104 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (579 - 8541, n=58, last 2 years)
4544 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
4413 Points -18%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
690 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
679 Points
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
678 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
677 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
673 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (649 - 681, n=5)
670 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (128 - 790, n=58, last 2 years)
637 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
636 Points -6%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2555 (2513.19min - 2555.42max) Points +17%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2482 (2389.2min - 2482.31max) Points +14%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2475 (2090.3min - 2474.79max) Points +14%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2297.13 (1223.99min - 2297.13max) Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (1934 - 2489, n=5)
2178 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
2176 (2149.96min - 2176.16max) Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2136 (1146.23min - 2135.5max) Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (327 - 3345, n=64, last 2 years)
1981 Points -9%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
280 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
274 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
268 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (261 - 272, n=5)
268 Points 0%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
255 Points -5%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
255 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (72.4 - 307, n=59, last 2 years)
250 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
238 Points -11%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Subnotebook
  (159 - 2271, n=62, last 2 years)
358 Seconds * -58%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
297 Seconds * -31%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
270.8 Seconds * -20%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (222 - 246, n=5)
231 Seconds * -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
226 Seconds *
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
225 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
216 Seconds * +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
208 Seconds * +8%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
67444 MIPS +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
65072 MIPS +7%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
61047 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (54768 - 63624, n=5)
59958 MIPS -2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
59660 MIPS -2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
51896 MIPS -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
48748 MIPS -20%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11775 - 77867, n=55, last 2 years)
48544 MIPS -20%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6403 MIPS +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6274 MIPS +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
6205 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (5702 - 6493, n=5)
6126 MIPS -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2669 - 6403, n=57, last 2 years)
5487 MIPS -12%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5470 MIPS -12%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5156 MIPS -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5151 MIPS -17%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12971 Points +15%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
12796 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12578 Points +12%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12106 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
11786 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (11081 - 12843, n=5)
11646 Points +3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2244 - 15220, n=56, last 2 years)
11589 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
11279 Points
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2604 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
2552 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (2477 - 2594, n=5)
2548 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2540 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (960 - 3130, n=51, last 2 years)
2498 Points -2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2454 Points -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2357 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2287 Points -10%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12469 Points +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
11802 Points +19%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
11781 Points +19%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
11780 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10951 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (9779 - 11542, n=5)
10410 Points +5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2557 - 14728, n=58, last 2 years)
10105 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
9897 Points
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1945 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
1942 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (1822 - 1946, n=5)
1906 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1875 Points -3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1805 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (621 - 2350, n=58, last 2 years)
1786 Points -8%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1714 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1691 Points -13%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
19.4 fps +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
18.6 fps +9%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
17 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (14.6 - 17.8, n=5)
16.5 fps -3%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16.1 fps -5%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
14 fps -18%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.97 - 25.1, n=57, last 2 years)
13 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
11.9 fps -30%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
55.5 s * -16%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.5 - 220, n=57, last 2 years)
54.7 s * -14%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
50.4 s * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (46.7 - 51.7, n=5)
49.2 s * -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
47.8 s *
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
47.1 s * +1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
46.4 s * +3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
46.1 s * +4%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.413 - 1.456, n=57, last 2 years)
0.517 sec * -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.511 sec * -13%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4996 sec * -11%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4865 sec * -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (0.439 - 0.4774, n=5)
0.4614 sec * -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
0.4521 sec *
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
0.4477 sec * +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
0.4464 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2176 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
206 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
268 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
679 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5414 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
13888 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1746 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
99 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
677 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
95.4 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
88.5 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
 
79.8 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
77.5 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
66.7 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
58.8 pt
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
51.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
47.4 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
25961 KRay/s +17%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
24712 KRay/s +11%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
22269 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (20007 - 22596, n=5)
21768 KRay/s -2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
13563 KRay/s -39%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1141 - 32888, n=57, last 2 years)
12854 KRay/s -42%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
8627 KRay/s -61%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
8569 KRay/s -62%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
110027 Points +18%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
103755 Points +11%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
93550 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (84591 - 93550, n=5)
89687 Points -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
69767 Points -25%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6838 - 123315, n=57, last 2 years)
61147 Points -35%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
47266 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
43630 Points -53%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
4646 MB/s +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
4627 MB/s +12%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
4132 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (3847 - 4201, n=5)
4054 MB/s -2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
3263 MB/s -21%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (444 - 5287, n=57, last 2 years)
2889 MB/s -30%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
2290 MB/s -45%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1940 MB/s -53%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
114899 Points +15%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
114236 Points +14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (99874 - 111733, n=5)
106909 Points +7%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
99874 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
85817 Points -14%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
84870 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80348 Points -20%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11579 - 115682, n=57, last 2 years)
79858 Points -20%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
14941 Points +9%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
14385 Points +5%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
13731 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (12929 - 13845, n=5)
13521 Points -2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
9475 Points -31%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (744 - 18418, n=57, last 2 years)
8152 Points -41%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
7326 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
7034 Points -49%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
58765 Points +18%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
55540 Points +12%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
49687 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (44969 - 49687, n=5)
47909 Points -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
34945 Points -30%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3366 - 65433, n=57, last 2 years)
31778 Points -36%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
22621 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
21139 Points -57%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
161430 MB/s +112%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
76247 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (60328 - 76959, n=5)
68967 MB/s -10%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
68795 MB/s -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
67393 MB/s -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years)
60135 MB/s -21%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
50795 MB/s -33%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
45713 MB/s -40%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
1005 MB/s +115%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
960 MB/s +105%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (468 - 930, n=5)
815 MB/s +74%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (166.9 - 1379, n=57, last 2 years)
743 MB/s +59%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
689 MB/s +47%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
627 MB/s +34%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
557 MB/s +19%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
468 MB/s
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
13896 KRay/s +19%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
13100 KRay/s +13%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
11637 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (10571 - 11985, n=5)
11455 KRay/s -2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
7057 KRay/s -39%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (610 - 17495, n=57, last 2 years)
6682 KRay/s -43%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
4503 KRay/s -61%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
4379 KRay/s -62%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
48270 MPixel/s +35%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
46137 MPixel/s +29%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
43772 MPixel/s +22%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6569 - 54881, n=57, last 2 years)
40259 MPixel/s +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
39002 MPixel/s +9%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
38837 MPixel/s +8%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
35861 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (31491 - 43868, n=5)
35656 MPixel/s -1%

系统性能

不出所料，AMD Zenbook 的系统性能主观上非常出色，我们在测试中没有发现任何问题。在合成基准测试中，AMD 机型持续领先于英特尔机型，而在日常使用中，你确实不会注意到这种差异。只是令人讨厌的是，它只能使用 16GB 内存。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
7428 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
7216 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7157 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (6563 - 7213, n=5)
6983 Points -2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
6625 Points -7%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
6527 Points -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4993 - 7788, n=50, last 2 years)
6435 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
6331 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
11168 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
10855 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10732 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (10265 - 11449, n=5)
10728 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
10662 Points -1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10526 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (9476 - 11331, n=50, last 2 years)
10479 Points -2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
10212 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10449 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
10279 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
9969 Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (9217 - 10449, n=5)
9852 Points -6%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9031 Points -14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6440 - 10623, n=50, last 2 years)
8624 Points -17%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
8500 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
8030 Points -23%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
9691 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
9423 Points +6%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
9090 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
8873 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (8108 - 9163, n=5)
8748 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (5305 - 10983, n=50, last 2 years)
8086 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
8043 Points -9%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7939 Points -11%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
1852 Points +9%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
1840 Points +8%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1698 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1643 - 1698, n=5)
1666 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1643 Points -3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1605 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (365 - 1971, n=55, last 2 years)
1580 Points -7%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1579 Points -7%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
1784 Points +8%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
1770 Points +7%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1658 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1560 - 1658, n=5)
1614 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1584 Points -4%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1523 Points -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (364 - 1875, n=55, last 2 years)
1523 Points -8%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1510 Points -9%
CrossMark / Creativity
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
1999 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
1978 Points +7%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1863 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1842 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1790 - 1876, n=5)
1838 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1782 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (385 - 2210, n=55, last 2 years)
1733 Points -6%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1730 Points -6%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
1703 Points +19%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
1612 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1438 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1428 Points
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1372 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1314 - 1428, n=5)
1362 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (312 - 1899, n=55, last 2 years)
1349 Points -6%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1201 Points -16%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
440 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (297 - 440, n=5)
328 Points -25%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
324 Points -26%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (156 - 448, n=57, last 2 years)
305 Points -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
295 Points -33%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
287 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
269 Points -39%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
255 Points -42%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
319 Points +29%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (132 - 325, n=55, last 2 years)
256 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (246 - 257, n=5)
250 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
248 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
247 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
246 Points -1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
243.5 Points -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
562 ms * -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
  (518 - 563, n=5)
537 ms * -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
535 ms * -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
531 ms * -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (363 - 1104, n=64, last 2 years)
528 ms * -2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
521 ms * -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
518 ms *
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
508 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7157 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
95353 MB/s +24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
88119 MB/s +15%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80515 MB/s +5%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
76766 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14916 - 108756, n=57, last 2 years)
70921 MB/s -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
69522 MB/s -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (63403 - 76766, n=5)
69492 MB/s -9%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
67660 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
87297 MB/s +50%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
85295 MB/s +46%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
72244 MB/s +24%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (15948 - 122210, n=57, last 2 years)
67694 MB/s +16%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
58321 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (50273 - 61739, n=5)
56450 MB/s -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
50572 MB/s -13%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
49971 MB/s -14%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
107658 MB/s
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
93323 MB/s -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
93239 MB/s -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (78347 - 107658, n=5)
90509 MB/s -16%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75291 MB/s -30%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
74292 MB/s -31%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16513 - 117897, n=57, last 2 years)
74034 MB/s -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
72172 MB/s -33%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
154.2 ns * -35%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
147.1 ns * -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
137.3 ns * -20%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M
114.5 ns *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
  (92.2 - 122.4, n=5)
110.4 ns * +4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (7.4 - 187.8, n=57, last 2 years)
107.1 ns * +6%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
106 ns * +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
101.8 ns * +11%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试（网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时显示出轻微的限制。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2087.5 μs * -89%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
1219.5 μs * -11%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1102.5 μs *
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
1045.4 μs * +5%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
435.7 μs * +60%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

与英特尔版本相同，我们的测试设备也安装了美光 2400 的 1 TB 型号。这是一款 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘，最大传输速率略低于 5 GB/s。固态硬盘没有创下任何记录，但其性能完全够用，即使在长时间负载的情况下也能保持稳定。在笔记本交付状态下，用户有 906 GB 的可用空间。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4929 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3402 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 433 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 416 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 96.5 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 375 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1033 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
94.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
75.6 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
65.2 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
58.5 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
56.1 pt
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
 
50.8 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
48.4 pt
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
44.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
4057 (4023.18min - 4057.01max) MB/s +71%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
3300 (3279.05min - 3299.87max) MB/s +39%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.2 - 4501, n=57, last 2 years)
2929 MB/s +23%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2690 (2667.9min - 2690.44max) MB/s +13%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2379 (2365.59min - 2378.73max) MB/s
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
2305 (2283.64min - 2304.98max) MB/s -3%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (1870 - 2660, n=17)
2289 MB/s -4%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2156 (2126.3min - 2155.87max) MB/s -9%
seq write
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
4317 (4288.28min - 4317.37max) MB/s +66%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
3660 (3614.13min - 3659.97max) MB/s +41%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
3001 (2954.22min - 3001.02max) MB/s +15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.2 - 5344, n=57, last 2 years)
2936 MB/s +13%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (2138 - 3141, n=17)
2678 MB/s +3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2604 (2525.41min - 2604.03max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2388 (2203.69min - 2388.49max) MB/s -8%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2309 (2175.85min - 2309.38max) MB/s -11%
seq q8 t1 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
6844 (6027.53min - 6843.85max) MB/s +52%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.5 - 7155, n=57, last 2 years)
5111 MB/s +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
4911 (4608.27min - 4910.87max) MB/s +9%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (4239 - 5093, n=17)
4726 MB/s +5%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4671 (3796.43min - 4671.2max) MB/s +4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4504 (3696.49min - 4504.05max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
3596 (3014.03min - 3596.41max) MB/s -20%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
3179 (2816.5min - 3179.49max) MB/s -29%
seq q8 t1 write
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
4955 (4919.92min - 4955.1max) MB/s +60%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
4467 (4437.85min - 4466.6max) MB/s +44%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.2 - 6810, n=57, last 2 years)
4031 MB/s +30%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
3752 (3716.27min - 3752.48max) MB/s +21%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (2884 - 3635, n=17)
3370 MB/s +9%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3164 (3094.35min - 3164.36max) MB/s +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3105 (3076.1min - 3105.46max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2446 (2406.49min - 2445.7max) MB/s -21%
4k q1 t1 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
82.2 (81.81min - 82.16max) MB/s +138%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
75.8 (74.48min - 75.75max) MB/s +119%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8.27 - 87.4, n=57, last 2 years)
61.3 MB/s +77%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
60.9 (60.46min - 60.93max) MB/s +76%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
58.8 (58.1min - 58.81max) MB/s +70%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
34.6 (34.41min - 34.64max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (14.6 - 40.3, n=17)
33.5 MB/s -3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
29.4 (29.32min - 29.4max) MB/s -15%
4k q1 t1 write
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
227 (221.95min - 227.04max) MB/s +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
221 (220.34min - 221.44max) MB/s +40%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
205 (203.95min - 205.23max) MB/s +30%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (75.9 - 286, n=17)
177.5 MB/s +13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12 - 360, n=57, last 2 years)
159.8 MB/s +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
157.7 (151.37min - 157.68max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
157.4 (157.1min - 157.44max) MB/s 0%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
84.9 (82.69min - 84.93max) MB/s -46%
4k q32 t16 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
4286 (4274.43min - 4286.07max) MB/s +372%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
3460 (3433.29min - 3460.15max) MB/s +281%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
2700 (2252.61min - 2700.15max) MB/s +197%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1827 (1806.76min - 1827.02max) MB/s +101%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.1 - 4286, n=57, last 2 years)
1281 MB/s +41%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (283 - 2850, n=17)
1133 MB/s +25%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
909 (848.35min - 908.51max) MB/s
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
283 (280.76min - 282.69max) MB/s -69%
4k q32 t16 write
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
4189 (4136.14min - 4188.97max) MB/s +863%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
3266 (3227.93min - 3265.61max) MB/s +651%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1760 (1708.14min - 1759.52max) MB/s +305%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1709 (1672.77min - 1708.93max) MB/s +293%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (222 - 2635, n=17)
1028 MB/s +136%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14.2 - 4189, n=57, last 2 years)
881 MB/s +103%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
435 (416.7min - 435.33max) MB/s
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
222 (208.14min - 221.73max) MB/s -49%
AS SSD
Score Total
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
8892 Points +161%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
7325 Points +115%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
6129 Points +80%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
4895 Points +44%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (515 - 8892, n=56, last 2 years)
4350 Points +28%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (2404 - 6406, n=17)
4298 Points +26%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3408 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3295 Points -3%
Score Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
3307 Points +172%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
2782 Points +129%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
2064 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1916 Points +57%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (787 - 2482, n=17)
1507 Points +24%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (246 - 3307, n=56, last 2 years)
1379 Points +13%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1217 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
787 Points -35%
Score Write
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
3972 Points +143%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
3203 Points +96%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
3039 Points +86%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (153 - 4469, n=56, last 2 years)
2322 Points +42%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2186 Points +34%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (1086 - 2796, n=17)
2077 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2038 Points +25%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1632 Points
Seq Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
5525 MB/s +50%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
4310 MB/s +17%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
4224.68 MB/s +15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (448 - 5525, n=56, last 2 years)
3992 MB/s +9%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3900 MB/s +6%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (3616 - 4177, n=17)
3850 MB/s +5%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3675 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
3186 MB/s -13%
Seq Write
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
4004 MB/s +84%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
3544.16 MB/s +63%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
2791 MB/s +28%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (99 - 4961, n=56, last 2 years)
2601 MB/s +20%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (1946 - 3177, n=17)
2589 MB/s +19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
2234 MB/s +3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2172 MB/s
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1996 MB/s -8%
4K Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
72.3 MB/s +42%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
62.2 MB/s +22%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (19.8 - 96.2, n=56, last 2 years)
58.5 MB/s +15%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
55.15 MB/s +8%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
51 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
49.9 MB/s -2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
48.1 MB/s -6%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (27.8 - 58.8, n=17)
47.9 MB/s -6%
4K Write
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
205.42 MB/s +16%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (135.6 - 288, n=17)
202 MB/s +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
180.6 MB/s +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
177.1 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (37.4 - 256, n=56, last 2 years)
176.4 MB/s 0%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
168.1 MB/s -5%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
161 MB/s -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
145.4 MB/s -18%
4K-64 Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
2682 MB/s +236%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
2301 MB/s +188%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
1586.68 MB/s +99%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1535 MB/s +92%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (349 - 2005, n=17)
1074 MB/s +35%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (181.8 - 2682, n=56, last 2 years)
921 MB/s +15%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
798 MB/s
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
349 MB/s -56%
4K-64 Write
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
3410 MB/s +175%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
2743 MB/s +122%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
2176.61 MB/s +76%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (105.9 - 3905, n=56, last 2 years)
1882 MB/s +52%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1818 MB/s +47%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
1669 MB/s +35%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (669 - 2255, n=17)
1619 MB/s +31%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1238 MB/s
Access Time Read
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.02 - 0.167, n=56, last 2 years)
0.05746 ms * -150%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (0.021 - 0.116, n=17)
0.05359 ms * -133%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
0.039 ms * -70%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
0.039 ms * -70%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
0.024 ms * -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.023 ms *
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.022 ms * +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
0.022 ms * +4%
Access Time Write
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (0.091 - 0.139, n=17)
0.1092 ms * -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
0.108 ms * -8%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.102 ms * -2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
0.101 ms * -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.1 ms *
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.017 - 0.352, n=56, last 2 years)
0.07518 ms * +25%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
0.032 ms * +68%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
0.025 ms * +75%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0245490735980122514701715196022052450269529403185343036753920416544104655Tooltip
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4420 (3476.9-4462.86)
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4784 (4418.73-4854.7)

显卡 - AMD Radeon 780M

GPU-Z Radeon 780M
GPU-Z Radeon 780M

处理器集成了 Radeon 780M负责图形输出，我们对这款 iGPU 已经熟悉了一段时间。新的 英特尔弧形图形在合成基准测试中，配备 8 个 Xe 内核的新英特尔 Arc Graphics 显卡的速度稍快，但在实际游戏测试中，情况发生了变化，Radeon 780M 依然略胜一筹。不过，我们也注意到测试中出现了一些轻微的波动，但远没有 Radeon 780M 那么严重。 Witcher 3不过，我们在测试中也注意到了一些轻微的波动，但远没有我们在英特尔 Zenbook 上批评的大幅掉帧那么严重和有害。原则上，许多老游戏和要求不高的游戏都可以在 1080p 下以中高细节流畅运行。即使是《赛博朋克 2077》这样的现代游戏，也能以低细节流畅运行。

在电池模式下，设备的图形性能比连接电源时低约 20%。更多 GPU 基准测试可在 我们的技术部分.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
97.3 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
93.2 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
91.7 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
90.9 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M
 
89.1 pt
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
88.3 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
79.7 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
78 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
13524 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
13316 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
12999 Points
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12866 Points -1%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (7868 - 14249, n=56)
12460 Points -4%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9702 Points -25%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (968 - 16296, n=54, last 2 years)
9617 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9085 Points -30%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8971 Points +6%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
8538 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
8441 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
8438 Points 0%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (4550 - 8816, n=58)
7747 Points -8%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7673 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7278 Points -14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (832 - 11887, n=58, last 2 years)
6978 Points -17%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3206 Points +11%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3172 Points +10%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
3027 Points +5%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
2876 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2847 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2846 Points -1%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (1496 - 3196, n=58)
2713 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (999 - 4501, n=59, last 2 years)
2571 Points -11%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
35623 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
34628 Points
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (20987 - 38330, n=55)
33142 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
32710 Points -6%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
30010 Points -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11490 - 58402, n=57, last 2 years)
27725 Points -20%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
26362 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
25139 Points -27%
Geekbench 6.3 - GPU OpenCL
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32096 Points +13%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
31025 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
29185 Points +3%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
28969 Points +2%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (15316 - 33077, n=53)
28703 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
28473 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (10125 - 52427, n=50, last 2 years)
26684 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
26058 Points -8%
3DMark 11 Performance
12723 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7733 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3203 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
562 Seconds * -52%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (241 - 1127, n=59, last 2 years)
558 Seconds * -51%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
535 Seconds * -45%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
397 Seconds * -8%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (300 - 664, n=54)
375 Seconds * -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
369 Seconds *
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
352 Seconds * +5%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
336 Seconds * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
Performance Rating - Percent
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
99.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
94.9 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
93.6 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
78.6 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
76.6 pt
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
70.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
66.3 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
30.5 (28min, 28.99P1) fps +3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
30.2 (28min, 28P1) fps +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
29.6 (27min, 27P1) fps
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
23.3 (22min, 22P1) fps -21%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years)
21.8 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
20.4 (16min, 18P1) fps -31%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
19.2 (11min, 13P1) fps -35%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
27.2 (3.56min, 19.2P1) fps +6%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
27.1 (3.98min, 18.9P1) fps +5%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
25.7 (2.69min, 16.4P1) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (7.81 - 53, n=54, last 2 years)
19.5 fps -24%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
14.1 (0.852min, 2.6P1) fps -45%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
13.1 (2.12min, 9.35P1) fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
11 (0.636min, 4.48P1) fps -57%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
29.4 fps +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
28.4 fps +3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
27.6 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.9 - 44.2, n=60, last 2 years)
23.3 fps -16%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
21.2 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
21 fps -24%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
18.2 fps -34%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
49.6 (35.6min, 39P1) fps +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
49 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
48.1 (10.9min, 15.3P1) fps -2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
43.2 (5.5min, 11.5P1) fps -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (17.7 - 70.7, n=60, last 2 years)
40.2 fps -18%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
38.8 (5min, 9.64P1) fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
31 fps -37%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
85.1 (75.2min) fps +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
76.8 (67.2min) fps +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
75 (63.4min) fps
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
73.4 (47.4min) fps -2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
63.9 (44.2min) fps -15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (13 - 99.5, n=62, last 2 years)
62.6 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
59.6 (44min) fps -21%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
36.1 fps +12%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
35.4 fps +10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20.7 - 97.1, n=56, last 2 years)
34.1 fps +6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
32.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
31.2 fps -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
31 fps -4%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
30.2 fps -7%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

051015202530Tooltip
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M: Ø29.6 (27-33)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 155.3 143.7 64.2 25.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 157 51 29.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 136.1 111.7 80.6 75
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 73.6 36.9 27.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 51.2 39 32.3
Far Cry 5 (2018) 75 40 35 33
Strange Brigade (2018) 164 69 58 49
F1 23 (2023) 76.6 61.4 43.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 37.3 28.6 23.7 19.8

排放 - 低风扇活动

噪音排放

带一个风扇的冷却装置
带一个风扇的冷却装置

AMD Zenbook 也使用一个风扇，两款机型的辐射基本相同。在最高 42 dB(A)的情况下，我们甚至测到了更高的音量，但过了一小会儿，它的噪音就降到了 39 dB(A)。在性能模式下，我们测得的最大音量为 ~51 dB(A)，而在耳语模式下，我们测得的最大音量为 33 dB(A)。由于功率限制较低，风扇启动速度比英特尔机型稍慢，但 AMD 测试设备的最大优势是我们没有遇到额外的电子噪音问题。

Noise Level

Idle
25.1 / 25.1 / 25.1 dB(A)
Load
35.9 / 42.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25.1 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.837.438.839.237.2352529.832.632.930.929.125.83129.331.531.436.728.128.74029.933.130.339.231.932.9502729.726.530.72827.96325.425.826.625.727.224.88022.824.422.423.323.121.21002224.72223.320.920.912522.123.922.823.719.722.216019.521.920.321.316.219.620022.323.221.722.319.320.625022.124.221.121.318.420.1315252523.319.713.819.440026.626.523.318.112.717.350027.227.822.717.511.516.963028.527.522.318.311.316.78002826.522.417.411.216.2100029.227.923.919.311.417.6125030.428.224.418.811.318.4160031.83026.420.911.620.2200032.431.826.219.912.219.9250032.731.226.119.512.520315031.130.825.716.912.817.4400032.23123.417.213.616.250003028.220.91613.815630028.326.118.815.513.914.5800022.62116.815.513.914.11000019.818.414.815.514141250018.116.715.115.814.313.91600015.914.415.116.21413.7SPL42.24135.930.425.129.8N3.83.52.21.30.61.2median 27.2median 26.5median 22.4median 18.3median 13.8median 17.4Delta43.21.922.22.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM		Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU		Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N		Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM		Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0		Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA
Noise
5%
-2%
4%
7%
-2%
off / environment *
25.1
24.5
2%
23.9
5%
23.4
7%
23.5
6%
25
-0%
Idle Minimum *
25.1
24.5
2%
23.9
5%
23.4
7%
23.5
6%
25
-0%
Idle Average *
25.1
24.5
2%
23.9
5%
23.4
7%
23.5
6%
25
-0%
Idle Maximum *
25.1
24.5
2%
23.9
5%
24.5
2%
25.1
-0%
26.2
-4%
Load Average *
35.9
32.4
10%
44.3
-23%
39.3
-9%
32.4
10%
35.7
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39.3
36.7
7%
41.3
-5%
35.9
9%
34.9
11%
Load Maximum *
42.2
36.7
13%
44.3
-5%
39.3
7%
37.3
12%
45.5
-8%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在空闲模式下，机箱依然保持良好的散热性能，但在负载情况下，AMD 版甚至比英特尔版更热一些--我们在笔记本背面测得的温度高达 50 °C。因此，在最糟糕的情况下或玩游戏时，不要将设备放在大腿上。在 CPU/GPU 综合负载的压力测试中，处理器短暂消耗 32 瓦，然后稳定在 20 瓦。

CPU/iGPU 数据压力测试
CPU/iGPU 数据压力测试
Max. Load
 39.3 °C43.1 °C42.7 °C 
 38.9 °C39.3 °C38.2 °C 
 31.4 °C28.3 °C30.2 °C 
Maximum: 43.1 °C
Average: 36.8 °C
50.2 °C49.6 °C39.6 °C
46.3 °C46.7 °C31.8 °C
32.2 °C31.9 °C30.9 °C
Maximum: 50.2 °C
Average: 39.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.5 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.2 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.4 °C / 88.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
表面温度应力测试（顶部）
表面温度应力测试（顶部）
表面温度应力测试（底部）
表面温度应力测试（底部）
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M		Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU		Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M		Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU		Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M		Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Heat
5%
10%
7%
6%
-4%
Maximum Upper Side *
43.1
41
5%
39.6
8%
40.9
5%
41.5
4%
36.5
15%
Maximum Bottom *
50.2
44.2
12%
38.6
23%
46.8
7%
45.7
9%
49.5
1%
Idle Upper Side *
25.8
25.3
2%
24.8
4%
24.1
7%
24.7
4%
25.5
1%
Idle Bottom *
26.4
26.2
1%
25.3
4%
24.6
7%
24.9
6%
35
-33%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

令人有些意外的是，AMD 版本的扬声器比英特尔型号的扬声器稍弱，这也可能与其驱动程序有关。不过，总的来说，它们的性能还是很稳定的，在很多情况下你都不需要外接扬声器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.234.62529.128.13128.129.94031.932.8502831.26327.233.88023.135.410020.94012519.747.316016.250.620019.355.925018.459.831513.861.540012.76850011.566.363011.364.980011.268.2100011.469.7125011.371160011.670.4200012.273.4250012.570.3315012.873.7400013.670500013.867.3630013.971.5800013.974.6100001478.51250014.374.6160001475.1SPL25.184N0.660.3median 13.8median 69.7Delta2.26.339.641.432.534.929.233.833.535.932.533.82831.82331.923.335.222.243.123.54721.755.621.859.817.463.314.165.512.165.113.465.710.771.210.271.510.170.210.469.210.667.410.869.711.264.711.862.511.960.312.161.612.167.112.274.812.368.411.463.124.580.40.649.5median 12.1median 65.13.35.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HASamsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 超长电池运行时间

耗电量

其功耗普遍低于英特尔同类产品。空载时，这主要是由于屏幕分辨率较低；负载时，这要归功于其较低的功率限制。这意味着 65 瓦的插入式电源足以满足笔记本电脑在任何情况下的电力需求。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.36 / 0.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.6 / 6.6 / 7.4 Watt
Load midlight 47.1 / 54.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 1920x1200, 14"		Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"		Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		Average AMD Radeon 780M
 		Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
-17%
-36%
-31%
-50%
-46%
-41%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
3.6
5.7
-58%
5.3
-47%
6.1
-69%
5.6
-56%
5.5
-53%
6.2 ?(2.7 - 14, n=49)
-72%
4.47 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=59, last 2 years)
-24%
Idle Average *
6.6
8.7
-32%
7.2
-9%
10
-52%
9.2
-39%
10.1
-53%
8.44 ?(4.7 - 17.6, n=49)
-28%
7.63 ?(2.5 - 16, n=59, last 2 years)
-16%
Idle Maximum *
7.4
8.9
-20%
7.5
-1%
10.3
-39%
9.7
-31%
11.2
-51%
10.8 ?(5.4 - 27, n=49)
-46%
9.57 ?(4.1 - 16.8, n=59, last 2 years)
-29%
Load Average *
47.1
44.5
6%
65.6
-39%
53.3
-13%
65.2
-38%
45.9
3%
56.3 ?(19.7 - 93.2, n=48)
-20%
46.5 ?(19.1 - 78.6, n=57, last 2 years)
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
47.4
36.9
22%
73
-54%
42
11%
70
-48%
60.9
-28%
Load Maximum *
54.3
65.2
-20%
89.6
-65%
67
-23%
101
-86%
104.1
-92%
75.3 ?(34.9 - 111.8, n=49)
-39%
68.5 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=59, last 2 years)
-26%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

05101520253035404550Tooltip
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø47.4 (35.1-52.7)
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø50.2 (36.1-54.3)
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.67 (5.24-6.87)

Power consumption with external monitor

05101520253035404550Tooltip
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø46.6 (45.6-47.3)
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø47.4 (47-47.8)
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø27.1 (23.4-45.2)
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø46.2 (44-47.4)
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø50.9 (46.3-52.1)
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø45 (34.3-50.7)
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.09 (5.54-7.09)

运行时间

充电曲线
充电曲线

其 75 Wh 的电池容量保持不变，运行时间优于英特尔机型。 英特尔机型我们测试过的英特尔笔记本电脑的运行时间更长，这主要归功于其较低的屏幕分辨率。在 150 cd/m² 的 WLAN 测试中，我们测得的运行时间略低于 13 小时，全亮度下略低于 9 小时。在 150 cd/m² 的视频测试中，我们测得 17.5 小时的出色表现，在全亮度条件下，HDR 视频可播放不到 6.5 小时。在负载情况下，大约 2 小时后电池电量就耗尽了。在设备开启的情况下，充满电需要 112 分钟（66 分钟后为 80%）。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
12h 54min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
8h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 26min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 03min
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA
R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh		Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 63 Wh		Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh		Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh		Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh		Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 65 Wh		Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
-23%
-7%
-1%
-35%
-39%
-8%
H.264
1046
917
-12%
1031
-1%
1010
-3%
595
-43%
911 ?(527 - 1298, n=27, last 2 years)
-13%
WiFi v1.3
774
458
-41%
710
-8%
707
-9%
620
-20%
479
-38%
727 ?(389 - 1585, n=61, last 2 years)
-6%
Load
123
104
-15%
110
-11%
134
9%
72
-41%
74
-40%
115.7 ?(57 - 197, n=47, last 2 years)
-6%

Pros

+ 优质轻巧的外壳
+ 出色的 OLED 屏幕，色彩准确
+ 出色的电池续航能力
+ 良好的系统性能
+ 稳定的 CPU 性能

Cons

- 内置内存/仅 16GB
- 无 SD 读卡器
- 无 Wi-Fi 7
- 大指纹磁铁

结论 - 采用 AMD CPU 的 Zenbook 14 OLED 更好

华硕 Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406 评测。测试设备由华硕德国提供。
华硕 Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406 评测。测试设备由华硕德国提供。

在 AMD 与英特尔之争中，华硕 Zenbook 14 是一个有趣的案例，因为价格更低的 AMD 版本被证明是整体性能更好的笔记本电脑。它的 Ryzen 7 8840HS需要更低的功率限制，才能提供与 酷睿至尊 7 155H的性能相当，即使在长时间负载的情况下也绝对稳定。集成的 Radeon 780M 在游戏时也很有优势，而且由于功耗限制较低，风扇启动速度也没有那么快。

AMD 机型的低价是在内存限制（最多 16GB，且不可升级）和屏幕的帮助下实现的。全高清 OLED 屏幕拥有非常生动的画面，包括准确的色彩还原，华硕仍然是唯一一家在 OLED 面板中集成了防止低亮度时 PWM 闪烁的软件解决方案的制造商。较低的分辨率并不是真正的问题所在--它实际上有助于延长电池寿命--但如果你已经习惯了更高频率的屏幕，60 Hz 的限制可能会让你望而却步。此外，高反射面板（无触摸功能）在室内也会带来一些问题。

Zenbook 14 OLED 配备了 AMD Ryzen 处理器，总体而言是更好的选择（而且价格也比英特尔机型便宜）--即使你不得不忍受它的 16GB 内存限制和 60 Hz OLED 屏幕。

总而言之，Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406 的整体性能非常出色，对于许多用户来说，16 GB 内存已经足够。这就是为什么把 Zenbook 作为日常笔记本电脑几乎不会出错。它有足够多的端口，键盘也很舒适，在耳语模式下（25 瓦的功率仍然绰绰有余）始终保持安静。它还比昂贵得多的 GalaxyBook4 Pro的整体性能，其最大的 Windows 竞争对手是 联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14它同样配备了快速的 AMD 处理器和非常出色的 2.8K120 Hz 三星 OLED 面板。Tuxedo Pulse 14 Tuxedo Pulse 14也是一个有趣的竞争对手。 申克 Via 14 Pro(Windows)，这款笔记本的后继机型配备了更亮的显示屏，目前已在开发中。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

华硕 Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406 可在亚马逊等许多主要在线零售商处购买，售价1,199 美元。

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA - 05/16/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
88 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard
84%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
60 / 75 → 80%
Weight
72 / 20-75 → 95%
Battery
90%
Display
90%
Games Performance
78 / 78 → 100%
Application Performance
96 / 85 → 100%
Temperature
87%
Noise
93%
Audio
84 / 91 → 92%
Camera
37 / 85 → 43%
Average
81%
89%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA (ZenBook 14 UM3000 Series)

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 Zenbook 14 OLED 评测 - AMD 版 Zenbook 配备了较弱的 1080p OLED 屏幕
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-05-18 (Update: 2024-05-18)