Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi 14T

小米 14T 智能手机评测--价格低廉的旗舰技术,但也有一些小瑕疵

物有所值。

如果小米 14 太贵,那么小米 14T 怎么样?它的价格要实惠得多,同时还拥有丰富的功能,而且运行速度几乎与旗舰智能手机相当。此外,6.67 英寸的小米 14T 还采用了刷新率为 144 Hz 的 4000 nit AMOLED 面板、徕卡优化的三摄像头以及直到Android 18 的更新保证。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

小米 14T 的评价--极具吸引力的性价比

随着小米 14T 的发布,小米公司推出了一款整体性能不错的智能手机,但在性能方面仅低于一流水平。小米 14T 的徕卡优化摄像头能拍出漂亮的照片,AMOLED 面板清晰明亮,刷新率高达 144 Hz,电池续航时间也不错。稳定的更新时间也有利于小米 14T - 将有 4 次操作系统升级,最高可达Android 18,以及 5 年的Android 安全更新。

总的来说,小米 14T 的负面因素不多。它的 USB-C 端口以 USB-2.0 的速度悠闲地工作,不支持无线充电,相应的 67 瓦电源也没有包含在手机的供货范围内。小米 14T 的替代产品包括三星Galaxy S24 和小米 Poco X6 Pro 5G。三星手机由于采用了 Exynos 2400 SoC,速度比我们的候选机型稍快,而且 6.2 英寸的机身也更小巧一些。小米 Poco X6 Pro 的连接性和性能非常相似,但价格便宜很多。

Pros

+ 高品质防水外壳
+ 明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏,刷新率高达 144 赫兹
+ 广泛的连接性
+ 稳固的主摄像头
+ 良好的性能
+ 人工智能功能,包括谷歌搜索圈
+ 更新时间长
+ 67 瓦快速充电

Cons

- 只有 USB-C 2.0
- 无无线充电功能
- 不含电源

价格和供应情况

你可以通过亚马逊等在线零售商购买小米 14T,目前的售价为 548 美元。在美国,这款手机不能直接从制造商的网站上订购。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
83.4%
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi 14T Pro S...
3. $9.99
for Xiaomi 14T Pro Screen Pr...
195 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
2.
80.5%
Honor 200 Pro
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $13.46
for Honor 200 Pro Screen Pro...
2. $12.98
Puccy 2 Pack Camera Lens Pro...
3. $3.98
YOUULAR [1 Pack Privacy Scre...
List Price: 800€
199 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2700x1224
437 PPI
OLED
3.
78.3%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
2. $14.99
Vaxson Privacy Screen Protec...
3. $12.99
Vaxson 3-Pack Anti Blue Ligh...
184 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2412x1080
394 PPI
AMOLED
4.
82%
Realme GT 6
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $10.99
CNPUTAO Case for Realme GT 6...
2. $10.99
Jelanry USB C Cable USB Type...
3. $8.99
Shantime (2 Pack Tempered Gl...
List Price: 800€
199 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2780x1264
450 PPI
AMOLED
5.
90% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
List Price: 899€
167 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"
2340x1080
416 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
6.
86.1% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon: $283.23
List Price: 420€
186 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED

小米的 T 系列总是在每年年底准时发布,这对潜在买家来说是一个有趣的优惠。T 系列智能手机集众多性能和连接功能于一身,价格相对适中。小米 14T 也不例外。这款 6.67 英寸智能手机的官方入门价不到 700 美元,绝不便宜,但在撰写本文时,您已经可以在网上以不到 600 美元的价格买到这款手机。

买家可以得到很多实惠:这款手机配备了 12GB 内存和高达 512GB 的存储空间,速度极快的八核 联发科 Dimensity 8300-UltraSoC、刷新率为 144 Hz 的 AMOLED 面板、最高 67 瓦的快速充电、基于Android 14 的 HyperOS(包括谷歌 Circle to Search 等人工智能功能)以及最后但并非最不重要的 50-MP 分辨率的三摄像头。

规格

Xiaomi 14T (14T Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra 8 x 2.2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-A15 / A510
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G615 MP6
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, HDR (HLG, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR10), brightness up to 4000 nits, up to 480 Hz touch sampling rate, 3840 Hz PWM dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 490 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, electronic compass, IR blaster, flicker sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, WiFi Direct, USB-OTG, MIracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (B2/3/5/8), 3G (B1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/40/41/42/48/66), 5G (n1/2/3/5/7/8/12/20/26/28/38/40/41/48/66/77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 160.5 x 75.1
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 67W max. charging speed
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX906, f/1.7, 23mm, OIS) + 50 MP telephoto camera (f/1.9, 50mm) + 12 MP ultrawide camera (12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120° FOV); videos up to 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 25mm, FF, 80,8° FOV); videos up to 4K@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, SIM eject tool, protective case, safety information, quick-start guide, warranty card, HyperOS 1.0, 24 Months Warranty, Head SAR 0.983 W/kg, Body SAR 0.994 W/kg; GPS: L1+L5, Galileo: E1+E5a, GLONASS: G1, Beidou, NavIC: L5; BT-Codecs SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V5, fanless, waterproof
Weight
195 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

小米 13T,制造商对其经济型智能手机的设计语言做了不少改动。保留下来的是窄边框、打孔式自拍摄像头和一流的表面处理,这也确保了其高级感。不过,小米 14T 取消了正面和背面的圆角和边缘,现在是完全平整的。IP68 认证确保了这款智能手机的防尘防水性能。

小米 14T 配备了哑光铝合金边框,其外观取决于所选的颜色版本,并采用大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护其 6.67 英寸显示屏。开箱后,屏幕上还直接贴上了保护膜。三摄像头采用了新的设计,现在由四个对称排列的圆环组成,框住了三个镜头和 LED 闪光灯。与显示屏一样,手机的摄像头也由大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护。

小米智能手机有两种不同的后盖。钛"、"钛灰 ""钛蓝" (后者是我们测试机的颜色)三种钛金属配色的玻璃后盖,由于采用了磨砂表面处理,不容易留下指纹痕迹。

如果你决定选择第四种颜色 "柠檬绿",那么后盖将由人造皮革制成。后盖的选择对设备的重量影响不大。采用磨砂玻璃后盖的小米 14T 重 195 克,而采用人造皮革后盖的机型(厚度为 0.15 毫米)重 193 克。

小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T

尺寸比较

163.3 mm 75.2 mm 8.2 mm 199 g162 mm 75.1 mm 8.6 mm 199 g161.4 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 184 g160.45 mm 74.34 mm 8.25 mm 186 g160.5 mm 75.1 mm 7.8 mm 195 g147 mm 70.6 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 小米 14T 配备 12GB 内存和高达 512GB 的存储空间

小米 14T 有两个存储版本,每个版本都配备 12 GB LPDDR5x 内存。小型版本配备 256 GB UFS 4.0 闪存,MRSP 不到 700 美元。而配备 512 GB 存储空间的顶级版本则要贵 50 美元左右。

在其他连接选项方面,小米 14T 与它的大哥大--小米 14T Pro 并无不同。 小米 14T Pro.除了 NFC、蓝牙 5.4、USB OTG、Miracast 和永远在线的显示屏外,它还有一个红外爆破器,可用于远程控制智能电视等兼容设备。

它的 USB-C 端口只能以 USB 2.0 的速度工作,但在使用外置三星 980 固态硬盘进行复制测试时,它确实表现出色,达到了 48.9 MByte/s,这在 USB 2.0 中是非常可观的。

左:无连接
左:无连接
右:电源按钮、音量摇杆
右:电源按钮、音量摇杆
顶部:麦克风、红外热像仪
顶部:麦克风、红外热像仪
底部:双 SIM 卡、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
底部:双 SIM 卡、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器

软件 - 基于Android 14 的 HyperOS

小米 14T 上运行的小米 HyperOS 操作系统基于Android 14。该系统包含大量人工智能功能,如谷歌的人工智能助手双子座、精选的图像编辑工具、用于翻译对话和通话的实时人工智能翻译器,以及谷歌的 Circle to Search 功能(按住 Home 键即可激活)。

14T 将接受四次操作系统升级,因此它将看到Android 18。Android 安全补丁将在五年内提供--但从手机发布日期起算,即 2024 年 9 月。根据小米安全中心新的Android 安全更新将每 90 天推出一次。在 11 月初进行测试时,最新的安全更新是从 9 月 1 日开始的,因此以小米的标准来看,仍然是相当及时的。

小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T
小米 14T

可持续性

关于智能手机中使用的可回收材料的比例,小米公司尚未公布任何确切信息。不过,据该制造商称,用于智能手机部件的再生铝、金和铜的数量已经增加。该公司还希望通过利用废弃渔网生产塑料材料和提供以旧换新计划等措施,尽可能减少对生态环境的影响。

据称,小米公司的目标是到 2026 年回收总计 3.8 万吨电子垃圾。到目前为止,这一目标已经实现了 44%。该公司还遵循经合组织受冲突影响地区和高风险地区矿产品负责任供应链尽职调查指南》(OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas 美国矿业协会负责任矿产 倡议》(RBA Responsible Minerals Initiative,RMI)的规定,规范锡、钨、钽、金和钴等冲突材料的采购。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 6E 和精确 GPS 的小米 14T

虽然 小米 14T Pro使用的是 WiFi 7,而小米 14T 只能使用 WiFi 6E。从纸面上看,这似乎是一场不平等的战斗,但实际上却是一场平等的对决。其他对比设备在速度方面毫无优势可言。

在与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器配合使用时,小米 14T 在 6 GHz 网络中的数据吞吐率超过了 1800 MBit/s,而我们在 5 GHz 频段中的数据吞吐率接近 1000 MBit/s。在这两种情况下,小米 14T Pro 的性能几乎没有提高。它的传输速率只是在数据传输开始的短时间内明显降低,但这是路由器 "唤醒 "造成的。除此之外,它的数据传输速率基本稳定。

在手机的蜂窝频率覆盖方面,我们没有什么可抱怨的。小米 14T 支持广泛的 5G 和 4G 频段(分别为 17 和 22 个频段),因此在国外接收无线信号应该不成问题。此外,它还支持四个接收信道和四个发射信道(4x4 MIMO)。小米 14T Pro 的配置略胜一筹,因为顶级型号的无线调制解调器还支持 4G 频段 25 和 39 以及 5G 频段 25 和 75。

Networking
Xiaomi 14T
iperf3 receive AXE11000
885 (min: 452) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
970 (min: 946) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1817 (min: 914) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1557 (min: 1522) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor 200 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
828 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 483) MBit/s ∼97%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
880 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
922 (min: 790) MBit/s ∼95%
Realme GT 6
iperf3 receive AXE11000
816 (min: 348) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
837 (min: 412) MBit/s ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S24
iperf3 receive AXE11000
774 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
913 (min: 688) MBit/s ∼94%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
861 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
812 (min: 583) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
711 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
725 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1443 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼89%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, ARM Mali-G615 MP6; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1786 (914-1873)
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, ARM Mali-G615 MP6; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1556 (1522-1581)
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, ARM Mali-G615 MP6; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø869 (452-922)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø772 (699-820)
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, ARM Mali-G615 MP6; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø970 (946-993)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø913 (688-994)
室内 GPS 接收
室内 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收

小米 14T 使用双频卫星导航服务 GPS(L1、L5)、伽利略(E1、E5)、格洛纳斯(L1)、北斗(B1、B2)和 NavIC(L5)确定当前位置。实际测试表明,这款智能手机完全能够胜任日常导航任务。在一次 10 公里的自行车骑行中,小米 14T 对我们的定位几乎和 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表一样准确,后者是我们的参考设备。

GPS 测试:总结
GPS 测试:总结
GPS 测试:环湖旅行
GPS 测试:环湖旅行
GPS 测试:转折点
GPS 测试:转折点

电话功能和通话质量

小米 14T 具备现代智能手机在拨打电话方面的所有功能。除了使用两张 nano-SIM 卡支持双 SIM 卡外,您还可以激活一张 eSIM 卡。它还支持 VoLTE 和 WLAN 通话。

在通话质量方面,小米 14T 在我们的测试中表现出色。线路两端的声音都能清晰地再现。在使用免提模式时,声音听起来有点受阻和尖锐,但总的来说,没有任何清晰度问题。

相机 - 徕卡三重相机,分辨率达 50 百万像素

使用自拍相机拍照
使用自拍相机拍照

小米 14T 采用三摄像头设置,与前代产品一样,该设置是与徕卡合作开发的。这意味着除了众多照片设置和一系列徕卡滤镜外,用户还可以再次使用 "徕卡活力"和"徕卡真实 "模式。您可以通过相机应用程序右上角的图标选择这两种模式,它们各自使用略有不同的色彩校准。我们使用 "活力"模式进行测试拍摄。

小米 14T 的主摄像头是 5000 万像素索尼 IMX906(f/1.7、23 毫米、OIS)。此外,还有一个 1200 万像素超广角摄像头(f/2.2,15 毫米)和一个 5000 万像素长焦摄像头(f/1.9,50 毫米)。它的摄像头配置由一个 3200 万像素的固定焦距自拍摄像头完成,该摄像头拍照效果出色,视频录制速度高达 4K,每秒 30 帧。

在光线条件良好的情况下,主摄像头可拍摄出图像清晰、色彩准确、细节丰富的漂亮照片。不过,它的动态捕捉能力不如姊妹机型 小米 14T Pro小米 14T Pro 的主摄像头传感器采用了更大的索尼 Light Fusion 900。这一点在弱光环境下尤为明显。虽然在这种情况下,小米 14T 的表现仍然好于许多对比设备,但它已无法捕捉到那么多的细节。

5000 万像素长焦摄像头使用 2 倍光学变焦和 20 倍数码变焦。变焦系数达到 5 倍时,它能提供令人满意的图像质量,但超过 5 倍后,图像很快就会变得模糊不清。超广角摄像头是三摄像头中最弱的一个。它显示的细节相对较少,但整体表现尚可,使用的白平衡与主摄像头相似。

主摄像头拍摄的视频质量很好,最高能以每秒 60 帧的速度录制 4K 视频。如果激活 HDR,在 4K 下每秒最多可拍摄 30 帧。拍摄时,您可以在各个镜头之间切换。

使用主摄像头拍照
使用主摄像头拍照
使用主摄像头拍照
使用主摄像头拍照
使用主摄像头拍照
使用主摄像头拍照

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo
orginal image
click to load images

我们在可控光线条件下仔细观察了手机的主摄像头。总体而言,它能准确再现色彩,但在拍摄浅蓝色调时有些吃力。不过,总的来说,与参考色(Delta-E > 15)相比,它没有显示出任何严重的异常值。

ColorChecker
5.9 ∆E
7 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 14T: 6.7 ∆E min: 3.05 - max: 14.25 ∆E
ColorChecker
20.5 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 14T: 21.83 ∆E min: 7.62 - max: 37.87 ∆E

配件和保修 - YouTube Premium 和 Spotify Premium 的试用订阅

小米 14T 随附一条 USB-C 数据线、一个保护盖、一个 SIM 卡工具、一份快速入门指南和另一份安全说明宣传单。配套的 67 瓦电源适配器不包括在内。该手机享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。

除了小米 14T 本身,在可以直接从制造商处购买该手机的国家,购买者还可以获得一些专属服务。例如,他们有权享受保修期外维修服务,并可免费使用 3 个月的 YouTube Premium 和 4 个月的 Spotify Premium。

输入设备和操作 - 触摸采样率高达 480 Hz

小米 14T 的操作手感超级流畅。首先,它采用精确的 AMOLED 面板,触摸采样率高达 480 Hz,因此输入处理速度非常快。得益于 144 Hz 的高刷新率,优质感得以延续,内容描绘如天鹅绒般流畅。振动电机可提供精确的反馈,其强度也可微调。

您可以使用光学指纹传感器对手机进行生物解锁,该传感器位于显示屏下方,可以很好地完成任务。此外,它还支持 2D 面部识别,只要有足够的环境光,它也能可靠地工作。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - HDR 下超过 4000 尼特

子像素
子像素

小米 14T 的 6.67 英寸 AMOLED 面板分辨率为 2,712 x 1,220 像素,像素密度高达 446 PPI,从而保证了内容的清晰显示。

默认情况下,AMOLED 面板会根据显示内容自动调整刷新率,最高可达 144 Hz。您也可以手动设置刷新率,最大值为 60 Hz 或 144 Hz。

在显示全白背景时,AMOLED 面板的平均亮度为 1,016 cd/m²。当使用较小的图像部分(APL18)重复测量时,其亮度增加到 1,680 cd/m²。在最低亮度下,显示屏的亮度仍为 2.23 cd/m²。

在显示 HDR 内容时,屏幕亮度会大幅提升。小米承诺亮度可达 4,000 cd/m²,而我们的测试结果甚至高达 4,676 cd/m²。因此,该显示屏可以产生出色的 HDR 效果。除了 HDR10 和 HDR10+,AMOLED 面板还支持 HLG 和杜比视界。

AMOLED 屏幕使用脉宽调制(PWM)来控制亮度。在我们测量的所有亮度级别中,它都以 120 Hz 的基本频率闪烁,这对敏感用户来说可能是个问题。不过,该屏幕还采用了高频 PWM 调光技术,将 PWM 闪烁的负面影响降至最低。我们测得的 PWM 调光频率为 3125 Hz,略低于小米规定的最大值 3840 Hz。

993
cd/m²
1000
cd/m²
1040
cd/m²
995
cd/m²
1012
cd/m²
1050
cd/m²
1005
cd/m²
1007
cd/m²
1046
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1050 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1016.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.23 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1012 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Xiaomi 14T
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Honor 200 Pro
OLED, 2700x1224, 6.8"
Oppo Reno12 Pro
AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7"
Realme GT 6
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S24
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.2"
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
4%
-65%
5%
-97%
-13%
Brightness middle
1012
1208
19%
1192
18%
975
-4%
1349
33%
1034
2%
Brightness
1016
1194
18%
1209
19%
974
-4%
1369
35%
1035
2%
Brightness Distribution
95
98
3%
92
-3%
98
3%
97
2%
96
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.7
0.9
-29%
1.8
-157%
0.8
-14%
3.3
-371%
1.1
-57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.8
1.4
22%
4
-122%
1.4
22%
5
-178%
1.9
-6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.2
1.3
-8%
2.9
-142%
0.9
25%
2.4
-100%
1.4
-17%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.29 96%
2.33 94%
2.22 99%
1.97 112%
2.22 99%
CCT
6489 100%
6413 101%
6242 104%
6467 101%
6635 98%
6674 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 19.74 %
Secondary Frequency: 3125 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。

小米 14T 的色彩描绘可以通过原色 PRO鲜艳饱和三种配置文件进行自定义。此外,您还可以选择色彩空间、调节色温并激活自适应色彩模式,该模式可根据环境光线条件调整显示色彩。使用Original Color PRO色彩配置文件并将色温设置为暖色时,AMOLED 面板可实现最佳画质。

色彩准确度(色彩配置文件 Original Color PRO,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩准确度(色彩配置文件 Original Color PRO,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩配置文件 Original Color PRO,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩配置文件 Original Color PRO,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
灰度(色彩配置文件 Original Color PRO,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
灰度(色彩配置文件 Original Color PRO,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩饱和度(色彩配置文件 Original Color PRO,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩饱和度(色彩配置文件 Original Color PRO,目标色彩空间 sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.641 ms rise
↘ 0.6355 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.739 ms rise
↘ 0.78 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

小米 14T 可以很好地在户外使用。即使在阳光明媚的日子里,也能通过视角稳定的屏幕阅读内容。只是不要关闭亮度传感器,否则屏幕的最大亮度会骤降至 539 cd/m²。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 配备联发科 Dimensity 8300-Ultra 处理器的小米 14T

小米 14T 采用 联发科 Dimensity 8300-Ultra是一款采用 4 纳米工艺制造的低端八核 SoC。它的姊妹机型 小米 14T Pro采用了性能稍强的 联发科 Dimensity 9300+.

事实证明,小米 14T Pro 的性能与 Honor 200 Pro小米 Poco X6 Pro 5G-同样搭载联发科 Dimensity 8300-Ultra。同类设备如 三星Galaxy S24(三星 Exynos 2400)和 Realme GT 6(骁龙 8s 第 3 代)在单核和多核计算方面都更快。小米 14T 在人工智能计算中表现强劲,与小米 Poco X6 Pro 5G 一起明显领先于三星 Exynos 2400 和骁龙 8s Gen 3。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2045 Points +42%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1898 Points +32%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1821 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=173, last 2 years)
1494 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1440 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (1424 - 1440, n=2)
1432 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1424 Points -1%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
541 Points -62%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6456 Points +46%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
4879 Points +10%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4602 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4547 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (4423 - 4547, n=2)
4485 Points +1%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4423 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=173, last 2 years)
4189 Points -5%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1906 Points -57%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1553 Points +42%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1498 Points +37%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1413 Points +30%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1090 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (1085 - 1090, n=2)
1088 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1085 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years)
1040 Points -5%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
817 Points -25%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
5561 Points +33%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4279 Points +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (4188 - 4279, n=2)
4234 Points +1%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4188 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4155 Points -1%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
4012 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years)
3474 Points -17%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2953 Points -29%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1616403 Points +16%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1519490 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1465265 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (1399064 - 1465265, n=2)
1432165 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1399064 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1329696 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points -7%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
598120 Points -57%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
19083 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
17763 Points +20%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
16008 Points +9%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
14751 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (14716 - 14751, n=2)
14734 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
14716 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13174 Points -11%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
12633 Points -14%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1256 Points +33%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1112 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
987 Points +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (946 - 987, n=2)
967 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
946 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=165, last 2 years)
917 Points -3%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
778 Points -18%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
390 Points -59%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
9287 Points +16%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8433 Points +5%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8039 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (7122 - 8039, n=2)
7581 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7122 Points -11%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
6785 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points -19%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4432 Points -45%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
14406 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
12177 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (11587 - 12177, n=2)
11882 Points +3%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
11587 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
11299 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points -11%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
9875 Points -15%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8990 Points -22%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
10193 Points +32%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8722 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7784 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (7735 - 7784, n=2)
7760 Points 0%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7735 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points -9%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
5456 Points -29%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4432 Points -43%
Graphics
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
29006 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
27809 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
26783 Points -4%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
25745 Points -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (16594 - 27809, n=2)
22202 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points -35%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
16594 Points -40%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8566 Points -69%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1908 Points +14%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1734 Points +3%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1676 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (1636 - 1676, n=2)
1656 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1636 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points -6%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1534 Points -8%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1130 Points -33%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
64597 Points +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (57997 - 64597, n=2)
61297 Points +6%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
57997 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
27247 Points -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points -69%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13576 Points -77%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
11574 Points -80%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
38828 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (33858 - 38828, n=2)
36343 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
33858 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points -35%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1163 Points -97%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1134 Points -97%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1122 Points -97%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
907 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  ()
907 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=42, last 2 years)
784 Points -14%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
521 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
277 Points -69%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4516 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  ()
4516 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=42, last 2 years)
3765 Points -17%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1051 Points -77%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
321 Points -93%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=42, last 2 years)
5410 Points +20%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4515 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  ()
4515 Points 0%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2721 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1058 Points -77%

虽然 联发科技 Dimensity 8300-Ultra's ARM Mali-G615 MP6图形处理器与 骁龙 8s 第 3 代's Adreno 735三星 Exynos 2400's Xclipse 940但是,它的性能依然强劲,即使是复杂的游戏也能流畅运行。其中一个例子是 GFXBench 的阿兹台克废墟高阶离屏测试,该测试使用的 2560 x 1440 像素分辨率与小米 14T 的 AMOLED 面板(2712 x 1220 像素)相似,ARM GPU 以每秒 75 帧的速度完成了测试。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3933 Points +25%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3153 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3085 Points -2%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3076 Points -2%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2907 Points -8%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
844 Points -73%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3902 Points +27%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3079 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3068 Points 0%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3056 Points -1%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2983 Points -3%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
835 Points -73%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12652 Points +15%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12004 Points +9%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11983 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11204 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11001 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3135 Points -72%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6649 Points +34%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5177 Points +5%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4953 Points
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4686 Points -5%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6673 Points +29%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5183 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5145 Points -1%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4813 Points -7%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1065 Points +3%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1055 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1036 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
349 Points -66%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1221 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1055 Points -14%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1032 Points -15%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
352 Points -71%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7231 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6342 Points +3%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6168 Points
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6113 Points -1%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5382 Points -13%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5382 Points -13%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25121 Points +32%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19017 Points
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18743 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13159 Points -31%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6698 Points -65%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6698 Points -65%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16451 Points +27%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12999 Points
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12776 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10622 Points -18%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6353 Points -51%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6353 Points -51%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
462 fps +2%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
455 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
454 fps
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
403 fps -11%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps -75%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
289 fps +56%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
287 fps +55%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
270 fps +46%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +16%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
185 fps
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps -57%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +1%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
116 fps
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -48%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -48%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -59%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +37%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps +16%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
171 fps +10%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
170 fps +9%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -65%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +30%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps +1%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -26%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -26%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -64%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps +20%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps +1%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99 fps -9%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps -17%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -70%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +59%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps -17%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -23%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -65%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +30%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps -2%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps -13%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps -17%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -72%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps +27%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps -2%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -35%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -35%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
185 fps +39%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps +15%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
135 fps +2%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
133 fps
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -17%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -70%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps +33%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
21 fps -12%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20 fps -17%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.5 fps -73%

联发科 联发科 Dimensity 8300-Ultra浏览器性能平平(我们测试了 Firefox、Edge 和 Chrome 浏览器),与其强劲的性能不相称。原因尚不清楚。我们还注意到 小米 14T Pro.另一方面,它的基准测试结果充其量只能算一般,与实际浏览体验完全不符,因为网页打开速度很快,滚动也很迅速。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
134.031 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
128.638 Points +82%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +76%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra (70.6 - 134, n=2)
102.3 Points +45%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
94.736 Points +34%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
70.555 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
60.18 Points -15%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
59.665 Points -15%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
267 runs/min +128%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
180 runs/min +54%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra (117 - 180, n=2)
148.5 runs/min +27%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +23%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
117 runs/min
Realme GT 6
103 runs/min -12%
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
76.5 runs/min -35%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
65.9 runs/min -44%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=66, last 2 years)
11.9 runs/min +80%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
6.62 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra ()
6.62 runs/min 0%
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
5.6 runs/min -15%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
5.18 runs/min -22%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
3.54 runs/min -47%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
176 Points +71%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
140 Points +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra (103 - 140, n=2)
121.5 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +14%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
103 Points
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
101 Points -2%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
61 Points -41%
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
56 Points -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
63748 Points +78%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
46286 Points +29%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra (35853 - 46286, n=2)
41070 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +8%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
35853 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
31742 Points -11%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
30234 Points -16%
Honor 200 Pro
28536 Points -20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
2154.2 ms * -13%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
1899.3 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * +20%
Honor 200 Pro
1456.4 ms * +23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra (1007 - 1899, n=2)
1453 ms * +23%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
1221.4 ms * +36%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
1007.2 ms * +47%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
662.3 ms * +65%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 4.0 存储为小米 14T 带来了很高的数据吞吐量,确保了较短的加载时间。在我们的测试中,即使是大型应用程序,如《PUBG Mobile》APK 文件(2 GB),也能超快安装。

Xiaomi 14THonor 200 ProOppo Reno12 ProRealme GT 6Samsung Galaxy S24Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-41%
-47%
-12%
-31%
0%
-4%
-43%
Sequential Read 256KB
3605.16
1992.32
-45%
1777.39
-51%
3452.12
-4%
3701.23
3%
3824.7
6%
Sequential Write 256KB
3294.31
1644.98
-50%
1700.51
-48%
3211.78
-3%
1435.39
-56%
3642.57
11%
Random Read 4KB
403.97
276.23
-32%
228.05
-44%
315.76
-22%
373.12
-8%
355.7
-12%
Random Write 4KB
493.57
321.09
-35%
265.4
-46%
397.65
-19%
175.98
-64%
467.74
-5%

游戏 - 当前游戏运行流畅

小米 14T 在流畅运行当前游戏方面没有任何问题。例如,即使选择了最高图形细节,它也能以接近 60fps 的速度流畅运行图形要求极高的游戏《源氏冲击》。

联发科 联发科 Dimensity 8300-Ultra's ARM Mali-G615 MP6GPU 可以提供更高的每秒帧数,但由于节能原因,它受到了《源氏冲击》的限制。同样的情况也发生在我们的第二款测试游戏《PUBG Mobile》中,在使用最高图形设置UltraHD/Ultra 时,手机将帧数限制在了 40fps而使用最低的 "流畅 "设置,帧率则高达 90fps。

我们使用测试工具Gamebench 对游戏帧率进行了测量。.

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Xiaomi 14T; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.1.0_27118081_27297621: Ø59.4 (54-61)
Xiaomi 14T; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.1.0_27118081_27297621: Ø59.1 (49-61)
Xiaomi 14T; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.4.0: Ø89.2 (84-91)
Xiaomi 14T; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.4.0: Ø59.2 (51-61)
Xiaomi 14T; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.4.0: Ø39.6 (37-41)

排放 - 几乎没有热量散发,声音稍差

温度

即使在负载情况下,小米 14T 的温度也不会让人感觉不适。在使用《飙酷车神》基准测试进行了一小时的 CPU 和 GPU 满载测试后,我们在智能手机表面测得的最高温度仅为 41.3 °C。

另一方面,3DMark 压力测试场景(模拟典型游戏场景)显示,系统性能有时确实会出现内部下降。当 SoC 在负载下温度过高时,其性能会降低 25-33%。在 3DMark 中,这种情况大多发生在第一次压力测试运行之后。

Max. Load
 40.9 °C41.3 °C39.5 °C 
 40.6 °C40.8 °C39.7 °C 
 40.9 °C40.9 °C39.5 °C 
Maximum: 41.3 °C
Average: 40.5 °C
38.9 °C40 °C40.3 °C
37.6 °C39.7 °C41.1 °C
36.4 °C39.4 °C38.4 °C
Maximum: 41.1 °C
Average: 39.1 °C
Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78.7 % +4%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 % 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.4 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.4 %
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.8 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57 % -15%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.5 %
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.2 % -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.9 % -13%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.8 %
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.6 (12-17.8)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.9 (14.7-25.8)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.8 (12-18)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.7 (43.9-58.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73 (66.2-87.7)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.4 (43.6-55.4)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.9 (44-65.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.6 (62-85.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.8 (16.9-29.8)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø12.2 (11.1-16.6)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.3 (16.7-28.9)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø11.4 (11-16.9)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø6.23 (6.01-9)
小米 14T
小米 14T

发言人

小米 14T 的立体声扬声器几乎没有低音,但拥有均衡的中高音,这意味着人声的表现尤其出色。即使开到最大音量,兼容杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos)的扬声器也不会使声音失真,其音量足以充满整个房间。

外接音频设备可通过 USB-C 接口或蓝牙 5.4 无线连接到智能手机。小米 14T 支持多种蓝牙编解码器,包括 AAC、LDAC、aptX HD、aptX TWS+ 和 LHDC V5。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.239.12526.838.23123.636.34022.333.85027.535.16320.536.98020.738.310019.340.312515.741.716013.652.820016.25225015.556.931515.156.340010.958.25009.965.263012.164.380014.167100014.276125012.979.6160014.276.9200012.779.9250012.779.4315013.581.7400013.183.6500013.181630013.480800012.778.81000013.477.11250013.474.31600013.160.9SPL25.491.4N0.784.7median 13.4median 76Delta1.11036.236.430.733.325.636.826.733.336.735.824.636.417.639.218.739.818.244.515.956.117.35615.260.414.161.913.462.113.86714.365.413.770.612.476.112.777.712.175.212.978.512.579.312.282.712.882.713.181.313.582.613.17913.775.91472.513.36925.291.40.786.8median 13.5median 75.21.28.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 14TSamsung Galaxy S24
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 14T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 充电功率高达 67 瓦

耗电量

小米 14T 的 5,000 毫安时电池充电功率可达 67 瓦。小米公司表示,锂离子电池在经过 1,600 次充电后仍能保持 80% 的电量。

根据制造商的说法,使用小米官方提供的 67 瓦电源充电需要 45 分钟,但我们在测试过程中无法使用该电源。为此,必须首先在电池设置中激活 "超级充电 "功能。

不过,由于我们使用的是第三方电源(Anker 317,100 瓦),因此在测试中无法选择 "超级充电 "功能。充电时间为 1:06 小时。34 分钟后,电量达到 80%,41 分钟后达到 90%。

总体而言,小米 14T 的运行相当节俭,在负载情况下耗电量相对较小。不过,在最大负载情况下,功耗会明显增加。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.33 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.97 / 1.12 / 1.19 Watt
Load midlight 4.13 / 12.25 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 14T
5000 mAh
Honor 200 Pro
5200 mAh
Oppo Reno12 Pro
5000 mAh
Realme GT 6
5500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-70%
7%
-26%
-45%
-47%
-24%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
0.97
1.11
-14%
0.69
29%
1.01
-4%
0.42
57%
1.11
-14%
Idle Average *
1.12
2.67
-138%
1.42
-27%
1.09
3%
0.93
17%
1.14
-2%
Idle Maximum *
1.19
2.75
-131%
1.47
-24%
1.16
3%
1.07
10%
1.16
3%
Load Average *
4.13
8.13
-97%
3.05
26%
9.86
-139%
15.43
-274%
12.33
-199%
8.23 ?(4.13 - 12.3, n=2)
-99%
Load Maximum *
12.25
8.64
29%
8.25
33%
11.64
5%
16.51
-35%
15.34
-25%
13.8 ?(12.3 - 15.3, n=2)
-13%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.21 (1.017-12.1)
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.41 (0.99-10.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.31 (0.634-16.5)
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.852 (0.783-1.069)
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.414 (1.33-1.67)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.586 (0.548-0.797)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.4 (8.46-12.7)
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.69 (7.88-8.74)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.2 (6.48-16.6)
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.852 (0.783-1.069)
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.414 (1.33-1.67)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.586 (0.548-0.797)

运行时间

在我们的测试中,小米 14T 的电池续航时间表现非常出色,整体略高于同类产品的平均水平。在调整显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的测试场景下,模拟网上冲浪的运行时间略高于 18 小时,视频播放时间接近 22 小时。

在对比设备中,只有 Realme GT 6的运行时间略胜一筹,不过它也拥有更大容量电池的优势。三星 三星Galaxy S24小米 Poco X6 Pro 5G的续航时间则略逊于小米 14T。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 36min
WiFi Websurfing
18h 11min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 37min
Xiaomi 14T
5000 mAh
Honor 200 Pro
5200 mAh
Oppo Reno12 Pro
5000 mAh
Realme GT 6
5500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-9%
-10%
5%
-9%
-9%
Reader / Idle
2016
1876
-7%
2398
19%
1815
-10%
H.264
1313
1723
31%
1227
-7%
967
-26%
WiFi v1.3
1091
993
-9%
986
-10%
1155
6%
880
-19%
942
-14%
Load
217
198
-9%
159
-27%
251
16%

Notebookcheck 总评分

小米 14T 以相对较低的价格提供了大量的功能和性能。它拥有近乎一流的性能、非常明亮的 AMOLED 面板、144 Hz 帧频、出色的三摄像头和超长的电池续航时间。

Xiaomi 14T - 11/08/2024 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
52 / 69 → 75%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
35 / 55 → 64%
Application Performance
65 / 85 → 76%
AI Performance
72%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
79%
Average
71%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
94.6%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
78%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 58.8%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米 14T 智能手机评测--价格低廉的旗舰技术,但也有一些小瑕疵
Manuel Masiero, 2024-11-13 (Update: 2024-11-13)