Acer Swift X 16 (2022)回顾。具有强大更新的16英寸笔记本电脑
宏碁Swift X 16(2022)得到了许多改进。一个明亮的16英寸显示屏,在16:10格式的2.5K分辨率,由英特尔A370M运行,一个酷睿i7-1260P,以及一个快速的1-TB PCIe 4.0 SSD。在所有情况下,都有16GB焊接的DDR5 4800内存。一些较小的改进,如HDMI 2.1和1080p网络摄像头也有利于多媒体笔记本电脑。
通过这一代的Swift X 16,宏碁能够弥补前代产品的许多不足之处。但是,如何 英特尔的A370M与NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti的对比设备,如戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus和华硕 华硕Vivobook Pro 16X,或RTX 2050在联想 ThinkBook 16 G4+?
由于除了CPU和SSD之外,我们最近测试的兄弟姐妹机型是相同的,关于机箱、设备、输入设备和通信的细节,我们请你参考相应的回顾,即 Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE.甚至使用的显示屏也是相同的。
其他的宏碁评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.4 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX i7-1260P, A370M | 1.8 kg | 21.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.8 kg | 16.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.4 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18.99 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | HP Envy 16 h0112nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 19.8 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
86.2 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE i5-1240P, A370M | 1.8 kg | 21.3 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.2 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 18.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
85.7 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M | 1.9 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
v (old) | 12 / 2021 | Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 19 mm | 16.10" | 3840x2400 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
由于整个机箱底部是隆起的,这导致最大的机箱厚度约为21毫米(约0.83英寸)。制造商规定的17.9毫米(约0.7英寸)是指没有考虑到这种隆起的测量。
设备。宏碁Swift X更新至HDMI 2.1和TB4
Networking | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
WiFi Chart
网络摄像头
维护
担保
宏碁在德国为其Swift系列提供通常的2年保修。
输入设备。宏碁Swift X的键盘很棒,但触摸板很弱
键盘
6排chiclet键盘的按键尺寸略微缩小,为15 x 15毫米(约0.59 x 0.59英寸)。按键很短,但与调整好的阻力一起,压力点创造了强大的反馈。你也可以用它来输入较长的文本,没有任何问题。
键盘在有针对性的压力下确实有一些松动。在打字时,这种情况会以回车键和哈希键的轻微颤动的形式显现出来。宏碁键盘的布局有典型的双占位,一个狭窄的数字块,以及较小的向上/向下箭头键。
触摸板
今年,宏碁为Swift X 16配备了其 "OceanGlass "触摸板。12.7 x 8.3厘米(约5 x 3.3英寸)的表面很滑,几乎有一种油腻的感觉,使得准确输入几乎不可能。拖放动作也更难执行。当手指在触摸板上滑动时,具有中等行程的集成点击键很沉闷,并发出咔哒声。
显示。一个明亮的2.5K面板,最终在Swift X 16中实现了16:10。
标签为 "B160QAN02.M "的哑光面板与同胞机型相同。与前代产品相比,这里使用的是16:10格式,现在的亮度为378尼特。
16英寸面板的分辨率为2,560 x 1,600像素,显示效果清晰。华硕 Vivobook Pro 16X和 惠普的Envy 16提供3,840 x 2,400像素的分辨率和OLED面板。
1,417:1的对比度和0.29尼特的黑值带来了饱和的黑色。6,717K的白色值也接近6500K的理想值。
在83%时,亮度分布不是很均匀,但这在日常操作中并不明显。另外,也可以选择具有1,920 x 1,200像素的面板。没有PWM闪烁。
|
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 411 cd/m²
Contrast: 1417:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.48
ΔE Greyscale 2.68 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
76.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
76.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX B160QAN02.M, IPS-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE AU Optronics AUOBD9E, , 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Chi Mei N161HCA-EA3, , 1920x1080, 16.1" | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 BOE NE16N41, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | HP Envy 16 h0112nr Samsung SDC4174, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AUO B160QAN02.H, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE Samsung ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | -11% | -6% | -4% | 15% | -10% | 19% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 76.4 | 75.75 -1% | 65.1 -15% | 69.6 -9% | 70.8 -7% | 99.3 30% | 65 -15% | 99.8 31% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 95.65 -4% | 97.5 -2% | 99.5 0% | 100 0% | 98 -2% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 76.6 | 76.51 0% | 66.75 -13% | 71.7 -6% | 73.2 -4% | 88 15% | 67.2 -12% | 96.9 27% |
Response Times | -10% | -12% | -6% | -51% | 91% | 55% | 91% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33 ? | 37 ? -12% | 30 ? 9% | 32.7 ? 1% | 38 ? -15% | 2 ? 94% | 14.1 ? 57% | 2 ? 94% |
Response Time Black / White * | 15 ? | 16 ? -7% | 20 ? -33% | 16.8 ? -12% | 28 ? -87% | 1.9 ? 87% | 7.1 ? 53% | 2 ? 87% |
PWM Frequency | 240.4 ? | 60 ? | ||||||
Screen | 14% | 11% | -1% | 10% | 7% | 2% | 12% | |
Brightness middle | 411 | 411 0% | 276 -33% | 371 -10% | 288.9 -30% | 328.8 -20% | 415 1% | 392 -5% |
Brightness | 378 | 364 -4% | 264 -30% | 357 -6% | 276 -27% | 332 -12% | 409 8% | 396 5% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 81 -2% | 85 2% | 91 10% | 92 11% | 97 17% | 91 10% | 98 18% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.295 -2% | 0.16 45% | 0.23 21% | 0.26 10% | 0.32 -10% | ||
Contrast | 1417 | 1393 -2% | 1725 22% | 1613 14% | 1111 -22% | 1297 -8% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.18 | 1.73 21% | 1.8 17% | 2.6 -19% | 1.88 14% | 1.53 30% | 1.92 12% | 1.74 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.84 | 2.7 44% | 3.77 22% | 4.4 9% | 4.37 10% | 6.04 -25% | 5.71 -18% | 3.18 34% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.48 | 1.18 20% | 0.63 57% | 1.3 12% | 0.42 72% | 0.58 61% | 1.85 -25% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.68 | 1.26 53% | 2.76 -3% | 3.7 -38% | 1.4 48% | 1.3 51% | 3.7 -38% | 1.77 34% |
Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.35 94% | 2.37 93% | 2.32 95% | 2.3 96% | 2.18 101% | 2.272 97% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6717 97% | 6616 98% | 6564 99% | 7271 89% | 6634 98% | 6362 102% | 7132 91% | 6483 100% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
8% | -4% /
3% | -4% /
-3% | -15% /
-2% | 38% /
24% | 16% /
7% | 41% /
27% |
* ... smaller is better
sRGB色彩空间被覆盖到100%,这允许一些不太雄心勃勃的图像和视频处理。
经过我们的校准,刚刚超过2的DeltaE值可以减少到更精确的1.48。只有红色继续显示出明显的偏差,其值略低于5。你可以在右侧亮度分布图旁边的方框中下载我们校准后的颜色配置文件。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
由于采用了哑光显示表面,378尼特的显示亮度足以让人在户外也能使用宏碁Swift X 16。但是,你仍然应该避免阳光直射。
性能。涡轮增压速度快,但英特尔A370M较弱
虽然兄弟姐妹的型号使用英特尔 酷睿i5-1240P和512-GB PCIe 4.0固态硬盘,作为唯一的备选方案,我们的测试设备配备了一个 酷睿i7-1260P和一个更快的1-TB固态硬盘。AMD版本没有提供。两个型号都提供16GB焊接的DDR5-4800内存和 英特尔的A370M.16英寸的笔记本电脑是为例如方便视频切割和媒体消费而设计的,包括全高清游戏。
测试条件
通过 "Acer Quick Access",你可以在三个性能配置文件中进行选择。然而,它们只对以下情况有影响 英特尔的Arc GPU,如下图所示。风扇的行为也发生了变化,我们在下面的 "排放 "部分进行解释。
我们在性能模式下进行性能相关的测试,并在正常模式下确定电池寿命。在电池运行中,64瓦的初始提升被完全排除,CPU被限制在28瓦。
性能模式 | 正常模式 | 静音模式 | 电池模式 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
cpu | 64 w > 35 w | 56 w > 35 w | 53 w > 35 w | 28 w |
GPU | 35 W | 25 W | 20 W | 25 W |
处理器
英特尔的多核性能 酷睿i7-1260P与同级别的酷睿i5处于同一水平。在单核性能方面只有10%的优势。据此,尽管有更大的固态硬盘,但额外的200欧元(约198美元)的溢价是不合理的。
开始时,P核的时钟速度为3.7GHz,然后在40秒内逐渐下降到3.2GHz,当35瓦的功率限制生效后,它们最终平息在一个恒定的2.8GHz。核心温度在适当的70°C(158°F)时趋于平稳。
长期性能超过了 前代产品的四核CPU。在相同的35瓦的功率限制下,超过65%。甚至AMD的 Ryzen 9 5900X在华硕 Vivobook Pro 16X在大多数情况下也只是稍微快一点。然而,华硕的ThinkBook 16 G4+和戴尔的 Inspiron 16 Plus以显著的优势领先于评级,这要归功于它们的 酷睿i7-12700H具有更高的功率限制。
由于没有涡轮增压,而且在电池运行时功率被限制在28瓦,因此性能下降了20-30%,这取决于不同的情况。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3173 - 12150, n=27) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1155 - 1812, n=25) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1234 - 4748, n=25) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (448 - 698, n=25) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (549 - 2034, n=29) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (165.4 - 260, n=27) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (264 - 906, n=26) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (16146 - 47064, n=25) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (4064 - 5791, n=25) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3866 - 10570, n=25) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1436 - 1786, n=25) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3.45 - 13.6, n=26) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (40.2 - 65.7, n=25) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (0.4559 - 0.727, n=25) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2176 - 10898, n=26) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (11015 - 56906, n=26) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (669 - 2709, n=26) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (42571 - 82493, n=26) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2901 - 6975, n=26) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (5950 - 26376, n=26) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (16041 - 92356, n=26) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (259 - 771, n=26) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1237 - 5858, n=26) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (13261 - 43652, n=26) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE |
系统性能
类似于 兄弟姐妹模式,由于英特尔处理器的高涡轮增压,系统性能处于高水平,特别是在网上冲浪时。
由于其RTX 3060 ,所以HP Envy 16特别是在内容创作方面能够取得进展。在CPU重度网络冲浪期间,距离 酷睿i7-12700H的距离减少到10%至15%之间。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
Youtube: 2160p60 CPU Load
Sunspider: 1.0 Total Score
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Speedometer 2.0: Result
Octane V2: Total Score
Jetstream 2: Total Score
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
Youtube / 2160p60 CPU Load | |
Average of class Multimedia (2 - 52, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE (42, 1) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP (43, 8) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX (37) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE (76, 38) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 (46, 1) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr (45, 3) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 (1) |
Sunspider / 1.0 Total Score | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years) |
Speedometer 2.0 / Result | |
Average of class Multimedia (169 - 782, n=42, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () |
Octane V2 / Total Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (43921 - 119954, n=44, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (150.6 - 374, n=55, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=84, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5969 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (25125 - 71544, n=25) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (24983 - 72065, n=25) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (23512 - 66799, n=25) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (77.9 - 118.4, n=21) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
凭借其非常高的传输率,西部数据的1-TB固态硬盘对PCIe 4.0标准是公正的。
虽然宏碁Swift X的直接前身在我们的固态硬盘性能评级中处于底部,但今年的模型能够在最上面的位置,为下一个模型留下一些距离。
拥有512-GB固态硬盘的兄弟姐妹机型也被大幅超越。然而,由于过热,这两个型号的固态硬盘都被严重节流了。
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB | Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -39% | -55% | -70% | -69% | -53% | |
Seq Read | 5639 | 3200 -43% | 2744.12 -51% | 2825 -50% | 2693.29 -52% | 4687.88 -17% |
Seq Write | 4171 | 3430 -18% | 1559.79 -63% | 1852 -56% | 1683.46 -60% | 2697.07 -35% |
4K Read | 76.1 | 63.1 -17% | 51.41 -32% | 58.44 -23% | 65.01 -15% | 61.12 -20% |
4K Write | 210.2 | 141.6 -33% | 156.13 -26% | 227.47 8% | 197.81 -6% | 125.7 -40% |
4K-64 Read | 2496 | 1354 -46% | 1014.34 -59% | 954.65 -62% | 855.48 -66% | 827.56 -67% |
4K-64 Write | 2340 | 1802 -23% | 940.2 -60% | 2413.44 3% | 395.8 -83% | 1884.06 -19% |
Access Time Read * | 0.031 | 0.064 -106% | 0.073 -135% | 0.026 16% | 0.078 -152% | 0.073 -135% |
Access Time Write * | 0.018 | 0.026 -44% | 0.028 -56% | 0.131 -628% | 0.06 -233% | 0.04 -122% |
Score Read | 3136 | 1737 -45% | 1340 -57% | 1296 -59% | 1190 -62% | 1357 -57% |
Score Write | 2968 | 2287 -23% | 1252 -58% | 2826 -5% | 762 -74% | 2279 -23% |
Score Total | 7636 | 4936 -35% | 3229 -58% | 4750 -38% | 2529 -67% | 4247 -44% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2309 | 1363.82 -41% | 2155.05 -7% | 1634.1 -29% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 658.6 | 433.2 -34% | 414.57 -37% | 379.46 -42% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 1613 | 1055.69 -35% | 1055.89 -35% | 1174.45 -27% | ||
DiskSpd | -25% | -71% | -50% | -56% | -40% | |
seq read | 4206 | 2619 -38% | 1248 -70% | 2124 -50% | 2355 -44% | 3304 -21% |
seq write | 5015 | 3900 -22% | 790 -84% | 2677 -47% | 2020 -60% | 2744 -45% |
seq q8 t1 read | 6940 | 6439 -7% | 1655 -76% | 3377 -51% | 2569 -63% | 6708 -3% |
seq q8 t1 write | 5031 | 3911 -22% | 871 -83% | 3241 -36% | 2752 -45% | 4857 -3% |
4k q32 t16 read | 2605 | 1522 -42% | 778 -70% | 923 -65% | 652 -75% | 824 -68% |
4k q32 t16 write | 2780 | 2390 -14% | 640 -77% | 501 -82% | 408 -85% | 299 -89% |
4k q1 t1 read | 88 | 65.3 -26% | 43.2 -51% | 61.2 -30% | 62.7 -29% | 63.4 -28% |
4k q1 t1 write | 305 | 208 -32% | 123.5 -60% | 187.8 -38% | 162.6 -47% | 125.7 -59% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -32% /
-33% | -63% /
-61% | -60% /
-62% | -63% /
-64% | -47% /
-47% |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
弧度英特尔A370M这里使用的是最低TGP为35瓦的变体。平均而言, RTX 3050中的RTX 3050和华硕的 Vivobook Pro 16X在合成基准测试中快了约50%。在工作站相关的3D基准测试中,这可以迅速变成高达150%或200%。一个集成的Radeon 680M的合成性能 AMD Radeon 680M处于Arc A370M的水平。
在电池运行情况下,图形性能会额外降低30%。
3DMark 11 Performance | 12621 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28727 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7789 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4255 points | |
Help |
Blender | |
v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G9-6B8A2EA | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在游戏中,英特尔 Arc A370M 被RTX 3050 Ti超越了60%。 RTX 3050 Ti中的 Vivobook Pro 16X的RTX 3050 Ti超过60%,而戴尔的 Inspiron 16.在一些游戏中,这种优势在200%至300%时变得极端,这是由于仍然相当年轻的图形单元的一些驱动优化不足造成的。
GeForceRTX 3060几乎在任何情况下,惠普Envy 16中的RTX 3060都要快3倍,而集成的 Radeon 680M只超过了10-20%。
如果你选择一个比原生QHD+更低的分辨率(全高清),并将细节保持在中等到高的水平,大多数游戏都可以顺利显示。然而,在现代游戏中,高细节水平就很少能实现。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 | |
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 146, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Arc A370M (39 - 42, n=2) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 153, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Arc A370M () |
GRID Legends | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Multimedia (last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Arc A370M (41.7 - 41.9, n=2) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Multimedia (last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX | |
Average Intel Arc A370M (31.3 - 34.4, n=2) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE |
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 148.6 | 136.9 | 41.4 | 16.4 | 11 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 168.8 | 100 | 53 | 26.3 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 99.1 | 83.5 | 68.4 | 66.3 | 39.5 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 70.4 | 37.9 | 26.3 | 19.3 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 34.7 | 27.8 | 24 | 22.2 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 90 | 49 | 46 | 43 | 29 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 175.8 | 73.2 | 61.4 | 52.1 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 67 | 49 | 39 | 32 | 20 | |
God of War (2022) | 35.8 | 31.8 | 25.6 | 20.4 | 12.4 | |
GRID Legends (2022) | 95.6 | 69.4 | 55 | 41.9 | 34.4 |
排放物。宏碁Swift X 16喜欢吹大量的空气
噪声排放
风扇在性能模式下声音最大,而且大部分时间是在非常低的负载下运行。
在正常模式下,它们运行得更安静,至少在低负载下几乎看不出来。但在稍高的负载下,这种情况也会再次发生变化。
在静音模式下,风扇保持关闭的频率要高得多,但它们也会在CPU负载只有10%左右时开始运行,例如当你下载一个Steam游戏时。
平均44.7 dB(A),在较高的负载下,风扇也并不真正安静。酷睿i5型号的36.5分贝(A)。Core-i5型号显著更安静。
然而,在我们的测试领域中,所有其他设备在负载下的声音都差不多。在充电时,我们不时听到USB-C端口附近有一些电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25 / 25 / 25 dB(A) |
Load |
| 44.7 / 45.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE A370M, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G | HP Envy 16 h0112nr GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | 1% | -6% | -1% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 25 -0% | 24.2 3% | 23.3 7% | 22.8 9% | 26 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 25 | 25 -0% | 24.2 3% | 25.7 -3% | 22.9 8% | 27 -8% |
Idle Average * | 25 | 25 -0% | 24.2 3% | 26.1 -4% | 22.9 8% | 27 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 25 | 26.4 -6% | 24.2 3% | 30.6 -22% | 30.5 -22% | 27.5 -10% |
Load Average * | 44.7 | 36.5 18% | 47 -5% | 46.2 -3% | 41.4 7% | 41.7 7% |
Load Maximum * | 45.6 | 43 6% | 47 -3% | 49.4 -8% | 51.4 -13% | 45.3 1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 47 | 49.2 | 51.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
冷却系统不仅声音大,而且也很弱。特别是键盘上方靠近风扇通风口的区域在满负荷的情况下会变得很不舒服,然后设备底部也会发热,热点高达55.5℃(131°F)。即使有更强大的组件,竞争对手也知道要保持更冷。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.5 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 49.4 °C / 120.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-20.6 °C / -37.1 F).
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M | Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Arc A370M | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | HP Envy 16 h0112nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, AMD Radeon 660M | Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -0% | 12% | 7% | 3% | 10% | 15% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 49.4 | 52 -5% | 42.9 13% | 46 7% | 45.2 9% | 46 7% | 39.4 20% |
Maximum Bottom * | 55.5 | 50.4 9% | 50.6 9% | 45.8 17% | 44 21% | 48 14% | 43.6 21% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.4 | 30 -6% | 26 8% | 29.2 -3% | 33.6 -18% | 28 1% | 27.6 3% |
Idle Bottom * | 32.6 | 32.4 1% | 26.5 19% | 31 5% | 32.6 -0% | 27 17% | 27.5 16% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
即使在长达一小时的Prime95和FurMark的综合压力测试中,GPU的时钟速度也只保持在最高值以下5%。然后,处理器从35瓦节流到25瓦,温度达到88°C(190°F),而GPU的温度达到86°C(187°F)。然后P核的时钟速度将只有约1.75 GHz,低于2.1 GHz的基本时钟速度。在纯粹的CPU压力下,速度不会低于这个极限。
CPU时钟E/P-Core (GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | - | 300 | 34 | 29 |
Prime95压力 | 2.1 / 2.5 | 300 | 67 | 53 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.6 / 1.75 | 1,960 | 88 | 86 |
FurMark 应力 | - | 2,050 | 52 | 60 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 0.3 / 0.15 | 2,050 | 70 | 71 |
发言人
扬声器的声音是向上的,低音很差,质量低于平均水平。然而,在将近88dB(A)的音量下,它们甚至能够填满一个大房间。如果你只需要再现声音,它们是足够的,但如果你想享受音乐,你应该通过音频端口或蓝牙使用外部音频设备。
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理。充足的电池寿命和低消耗的Swift X
消耗功率
在日常工作中,我们测量了大约7.6瓦,这只能被多媒体类的少数设备所击败,如 IdeaPad 5 Pro 16.
在游戏和其他负载情况下,大约70瓦,与前辈的Nvidia RTX 3050相同。 Nvidia RTX 3050也使用。根据我们的数据库,集成了AMD的RDNA 2 GPU的设备甚至明显更有效率,约为45瓦。另一方面,HP Envy 16配备了RTX 3060在游戏时消耗大约两倍的功率(133瓦)。
100瓦的USB-C充电器是足够的,因为略高于100瓦的峰值负载只发生在我们的综合压力测试的不现实的情况下,在日常操作中不会真正发生。它们可能只发生在第一秒,例如在CPU完全纯负荷或游戏期间。
Off / Standby | 0.49 / 0.7 Watt |
Idle | 3.7 / 7.6 / 11.1 Watt |
Load |
70 / 108 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX i7-1260P, A370M, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE i5-1240P, A370M, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, , 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | HP Envy 16 h0112nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.1" | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -9% | -22% | -54% | -103% | -50% | -33% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.7 | 5.7 -54% | 5 -35% | 6.8 -84% | 10 -170% | 8.2 -122% | 6.78 ? -83% |
Idle Average * | 7.6 | 8 -5% | 11.2 -47% | 9.6 -26% | 10.9 -43% | 16.2 -113% | 11.3 ? -49% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.1 | 10.4 6% | 11.6 -5% | 17 -53% | 27.8 -150% | 19.7 -77% | 13.4 ? -21% |
Load Average * | 70 | 74 -6% | 89.3 -28% | 117.5 -68% | 116.4 -66% | 65.8 6% | 71.1 ? -2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 68.8 | 65 6% | 83 -21% | 113.1 -64% | 133.7 -94% | 65.6 5% | |
Load Maximum * | 108 | 108.5 -0% | 102 6% | 137.4 -27% | 209.8 -94% | 104 4% | 117.3 ? -9% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption With External Monitor
电池寿命
在我们的WLAN测试中,在亮度设置为150尼特和宏碁的正常模式下,Swift X 16持续了9小时。这比前代产品多了一个小时,比兄弟机型少了40分钟,尽管那是在省电模式下测试的。
总的来说,这些数值属于这个级别的平均水平。然而,华硕 Vivobook Pro 16X持续时间超过了11小时,而戴尔的 Inspiron 16 Plus和联想 IdeaPad 5 Pro 16达到与Swift X相似的数值。
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX i7-1260P, A370M, 56 Wh | Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE i5-1240P, A370M, 56 Wh | Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 58.7 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 71 Wh | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | HP Envy 16 h0112nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M, 75 Wh | Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 96 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -5% | 3% | 16% | 6% | 16% | 8% | 13% | 33% | |
H.264 | 624 | 586 -6% | 506 -19% | 757 21% | 821 ? 32% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 543 | 583 7% | 484 -11% | 489 -10% | 575 6% | 472 -13% | 588 8% | 675 24% | 628 ? 16% |
Load | 65 | 54 -17% | 90 38% | 90 38% | 69 6% | 94 45% | 66 2% | 97.8 ? 50% |
Pros
Cons
评语。尽管进行了大量的升级,宏碁Swift X 16仍然没有实现。
宏碁Swift X 16 (2022)是一款紧凑的16英寸笔记本电脑,重量只有1.75公斤(约3.96磅)。前代产品的许多问题领域幸运地得到了补救。显示屏现在明显更亮,达到380尼特,提供2,560 x 1,600像素的高分辨率,而且我们也喜欢16:10的格式。
不幸的是,英特尔的Arc GPU并不是为3D工作设计的,而且也落后于GeForce RTX 3050 Ti在戴尔Inspiron 16 Plus和华硕VivoBook Pro 16X游戏时。另一方面,由于英特尔的Alder Lake P CPU,该系统提供了一个高性能。此外,内置的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘是最快的之一,尽管它遭受了严重的热节流。但至少,你可以安装第二个全尺寸的M.2 SSD。
其他积极的方面是更新到HDMI 2.1和1080p网络摄像头,而外壳继续由坚固的金属制成,键盘也适合经常打字的人使用。然而,滑溜溜的触摸板明显更糟糕。
尽管在显示和系统性能方面有一些明显的改进,但考虑到英特尔Arc带来的图形性能下降和高排放,1500欧元(约1482美元)的价格简直太高了。
风扇的行为和冷却性能并不令人印象深刻,扬声器仍然很糟糕,而且没有配备高效iGPU的AMD版本。所以总的来说,我们看不到1500欧元(约1482美元)的高价的理由。但至少在大约相同的性能下,带有512-GB固态硬盘的酷睿i5版本的价格要低200欧元(约合198美元)。
另一方面,在更低的成本下,竞争对手在许多方面提供了更多,例如,联想的 ThinkBook 16 G4+价格为1200欧元(约1186美元)或 IdeaPad 5 Pro 16价格为1000欧元(约合988美元)。 惠普的Envy 16提供了多媒体、商务和游戏的组合,并以1700欧元(约合1680美元)的价格提供了明显更多的性能。
价格和可用性
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
- 10/25/2022 v7 (old)
Marvin Gollor