Aoostar GOD77 评测 - 配备灯光效果和 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS 的迷你 PC，采用抢眼的赛博朋克机箱
傲星是一家中国系统制造商，成立于 2013 年。作为一家微型 PC 制造商，该公司还拥有 T-BAO、天宝、天贝、天钡等品牌。傲星 GOD77 是一款迷你 PC，配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS.在我们的测试配置中，这款小型 PC 提供 16 GB DDR5 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘。该设备目前的售价为 419 美元。此外，GOD77 还可以订购 32 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘。不过，裸机版本的售价为 349 美元，因此价格要高一些，为 499 美元。因此，在价格方面，该制造商与竞争对手保持一致。现在，我们来仔细看看它的性能。我们在下表中列出了本次评测的竞争对手名单。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.9 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Aoostar GOD77 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | 603 g | 58 mm | |
| 85.1 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 66 mm | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Acemagic AM20 R7 7735H, Radeon 680M | 339 g | 38 mm | |
| 83.7 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Morefine M600, 6600U R5 6600U, Radeon 660M | 768 g | 40.6 mm | |
| 87.3 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 750 g | 52.3 mm | |
| 82.8 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | 753 g | 58 mm | |
| 82.3 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Geekom Mini IT12 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 572 g | 45.6 mm | |
| 79.5 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Maxtang MTN-FP750 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | 601 g | 52 mm |
搭载 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS 的 Aoostar GOD77 详细信息
外壳 - 大量塑料材质，可选配 RGB 灯光
从外观上看，Aoostar GOD77 是一款给人留下深刻印象的微型电脑。Aoostar 将 GOD77 的硬件安装在一个相当紧凑的外壳中，具有非传统的赛博朋克风格。不过，制造商在材料的选择上完全依赖于塑料。从触感上看，GOD77 比 Minisforum EliteMini UMG 便宜一些。 Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX或 Morefine M600.不过，就稳定性而言，这款机箱还是令人信服的。只要稍稍用力，机箱盖和底部就能弯曲，同时还伴有吱吱嘎嘎的声响。不过，在日常使用中，没有听到机箱升温和降温的声音。Aoostar 还提供 GOD77 的白色版本，从制造商提供的图片来看更像是灰色。RGB 风扇在 Aoostar GOD77 上物有所值，因为顶部安装的 CPU 风扇配备了此功能。各种效果可通过设备正面的按钮进行切换。如果不喜欢灯光效果，也可以完全关闭。
在空间要求方面，我们的测试样品在同类产品中处于中等水平。设备尺寸为 13 x 13.4 厘米，不算特别小，但也不显得笨重。在重量方面，我们测得的重量为 603 克，比测试中的其他设备略轻。
设备 - 现代选择，包括 USB4
Aoostar GOD77 的外部接口非常丰富，分布在正面和背面。一共有五个 USB 接口，其中正面的 Type-C 接口与 USB4 是最先进的接口。这样就可以使用外置显卡等。在测试中，我们将结合 GPD G1(配备 AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT 的 eGPU）的性能。屏幕可以通过 HDMI、DisplayPort 或 USB-C 连接。甚至可以实现 144 Hz 的 4K，这在目前许多微型电脑中还不是标准配置。
交流
Aoostar 在 GOD77 上使用英特尔 Wi-Fi 6 AX200 模块进行无线连接。WLAN 模块可在 2.4 GHz 和 5 GHz 频段内工作。我们在测试中测得了极佳的速率。我们的测试样品在发送和接收速率方面都获得了第一名。只有 Minisforum 海王星系列 NAD9以微弱优势位居第二。我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 测试路由器进行了测试。除了无线连接，Aoostar GOD77 还提供了两个 LAN 端口。不过，其中只有一个端口支持高达 2.5 GBit/s 的传输速度，而第二个端口只能达到 1 GBit/s。
交付范围
包装盒内有 Aoostar GOD77 本体以及用于启动和运行微型电脑的 100 瓦电源装置。制造商还提供了一条 HDMI 线和一条电源线。此外，还包括一条用于连接 2.5 英寸存储驱动器的带状电缆。
维护
鉴于 Aoostar 将 GOD77 作为裸机系统销售，即使不带内存和固态硬盘，卸下底盖的螺丝隐藏在胶粘的橡胶脚垫下，这对用户并不友好。拧下底部的四颗螺丝后，底盖就可以轻松取下。内存和固态硬盘很容易接触到，不过 WLAN 模块也很容易接触到，因为它位于固态硬盘的正下方。在我们的测试样品中，傲星在内存和固态硬盘之间安装了一个相对较小的风扇。如果要安装 2.5 英寸存储设备，必须先移除风扇。
Aoostar GOD77 的顶盖也很容易拆卸。它也只用四颗螺丝固定。不过，下面只有一个相对较大的风扇，还带有 RGB 灯光。此外，还可以看到全表面 CPU 冷却器。
性能 - 基于 Zen 3+ 的 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
餈 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS拥有 8 核 16 线程和 Zen 3+ 架构的 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS 远未成为过去式。毕竟，由于 AMD Radeon 680M系统芯片提供了强大的 iGPU，也能处理许多游戏。Aoostar GOD77 配备了 16 GB 内存，达到了一般标准。大容量存储也是如此，有 512 GB 的存储空间。不过，Aoostar 还为 GOD77 配备了 32 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘。
测试条件
所有性能测试均在最大
功率计划下进行。我们没有更改 SoC 功耗方面的功率限制，而是根据 BIOS 设置将其保留为出厂设置。节能方案仅用于能耗测量和噪音测量，符合我们的 测试标准.
处理器
Aoostar 在 GOD77 中使用的处理器是 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS该处理器拥有 8 个内核和 16 个线程。这款 SoC 的最大功耗为 54 瓦，可以充分发挥其性能。相比之下，这足以在性能评级中获得第三名的好成绩。与 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX在 Geekom AS 6相比，我们测试样本中的 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS 以微弱优势胜出。不过，在日常使用中并没有明显的差异。更有趣的是与 迈腾 MTN-FP750的直接比较更有趣，因为这款微型电脑配备了相同的处理器。不过，Aoostar GOD77 在所有基准测试中都取得了明显更好的性能，这也与内存配置有关。傲星在 GOD77 中安装了两个 DDR5 内存模块，而 Maxtang MTN-FP750 只安装了一个模块。
因此，我们的测试样品在 AIDA64 基准测试中也取得了不错的成绩。结果是稳居第二。不过，与 Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX的差距已经比较大，达到 39%。
有关进一步的比较和基准测试，请参阅我们的 CPU 对比表.
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| WinRAR - Result | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Average of class Mini PC | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (561 - 51004, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (308 - 26952, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Aoostar GOD77 与 Cinebench R15 多环对比
Cinebench R15 连续循环是对冷却装置的真正挑战。监测数据显示 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS仅在很短的时间内达到 54 瓦的最大功率。在较长时间内，功率必须节流到 43 瓦左右。不过，在 86.1 °C 的温度下，SoC 尚未达到临界温度范围。与竞争对手相比，Aoostar GOD77 再次稳居第二。处理器的稳定性能值得肯定。
系统性能
在 CPU 基准测试中，Aoostar GOD77 的系统性能非常出色：在 PCMark 10 中，它再次取得了第二名的好成绩。只有 Minisforum Elitemini UM780 XT略胜一筹，因为其 SoC 速度更快、更先进。在比较 Crossmark 结果时，我们的测试样品滑到了中场。正如我们经常看到的那样，英特尔系统在这方面占有优势。因此 Minisforum 海王星系列 NAD9和 Geekom 迷你 IT12都领先于 Aoostar GOD77。
在内存测试中，我们的测试设备也不得不向一些竞争对手认输。虽然AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS 也能处理更快的内存，但 Aoostar 只能安装 4,800 MT/s 的 DDR5 内存。据 AMD 称，该 SoC 支持 6400 MT/s 的内存。
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 98583, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
我们的测试样本基于最小配置，因此只有 512 GB SSD。不过，安装的是 PCIe 4.0 型号，因此取得了不错的结果。不过，从连续负载情况中可以看出，数值并不十分稳定。过不了多久，我们就会发现性能明显下降。虽然 Aoostar 在底部安装了一个小风扇，但在长时间负载的情况下还是无法避免性能下降。此外，如果要安装第二个大容量存储设备（2.5 英寸格式），风扇必须让路。
有关进一步的比较和基准测试，请参阅我们的 比较表.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
显卡 - AMD Radeon 680M iGPU
图像输出由 AMD Radeon 680M处理图像输出。在已交付的系统中，仅为 iGPU 预留了 512 MB 内存。因此，最好立即为系统配备 32 GB 内存，以便立即为 iGPU 分配更多内存。在直接的性能比较中，我们的测试样本仍然可以提供良好的 3D 性能。在与 Geekom AS 6.AMD Radeon 780M 处理器的性能明显高于 AMD Radeon 780M
进一步的比较和基准测试可参见我们的 GPU 对比表.
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Aoostar GOD77, AMD Radeon 680M R7 7735HS | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840HS | Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H | Acemagic AM20, AMD Radeon 680M R7 7735H | Morefine M600, 6600U, AMD Radeon 660M R5 6600U | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX, AMD Radeon 680M R9 6900HX | Geekom Mini IT12, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i7-1260P | Maxtang MTN-FP750, AMD Radeon 680M R7 7735HS | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPECviewperf 12 | 20% | -54% | 1% | -29% | -2% | -58% | -38% | -12% | |
| 1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 83.3 | 85 2% | 40.9 -51% | 85.2 2% | 55.8 -33% | 75.3 -10% | 38.7 -54% | 46.9 -44% | 75.4 ? -9% |
| 1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 83.3 | 89.8 8% | 41.2 -51% | 78.5 -6% | 45 -46% | 70.3 -16% | 38.5 -54% | 51.5 -38% | 64.2 ? -23% |
| 1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 51.6 | 51.1 -1% | 9.64 -81% | 52.5 2% | 39.3 -24% | 45.2 -12% | 7.52 -85% | 33.2 -36% | 37 ? -28% |
| 1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) | 20.1 | 0.41 | 13.7 | 51.1 | 76.1 | 0.41 | 13.3 ? | ||
| 1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 70 | 73.4 5% | 39.9 -43% | 61.6 -12% | 44.4 -37% | 58.3 -17% | 36.5 -48% | 45.2 -35% | 64 ? -9% |
| 1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 27.1 | 61.7 128% | 12.3 -55% | 28 3% | 25.8 -5% | 44 62% | 11.2 -59% | 17.9 -34% | 28.5 ? 5% |
| 1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 31.6 | 30.1 -5% | 17.9 -43% | 36.2 15% | 22.8 -28% | 30.1 -5% | 16.7 -47% | 17.5 -45% | 35.3 ? 12% |
| 1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 108 | 113 5% | 47.2 -56% | 112 4% | 74.6 -31% | 88.8 -18% | 43.7 -60% | 72.1 -33% | 72.4 ? -33% |
| SPECviewperf 13 | 30% | -54% | 11% | -39% | -2% | -56% | -34% | -4% | |
| 3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 81.7 | 86.1 5% | 40.5 -50% | 87.7 7% | 51.7 -37% | 76.7 -6% | 37.9 -54% | 48.3 -41% | 74.8 ? -8% |
| Catia (catia-05) | 118 | 132 12% | 59.4 -50% | 117 -1% | 56.9 -52% | 105 -11% | 56.3 -52% | 73.9 -37% | 91.4 ? -23% |
| Creo (creo-02) | 80.4 | 93.6 16% | 38.8 -52% | 87.1 8% | 53.8 -33% | 78.4 -2% | 36.8 -54% | 44.9 -44% | 73 ? -9% |
| Energy (energy-02) | 14.1 | 25.8 83% | 4.27 -70% | 13.4 -5% | 6.16 -56% | 13.9 -1% | 4.29 -70% | 11.4 -19% | 17.7 ? 26% |
| Maya (maya-05) | 101 | 108 7% | 44.2 -56% | 108 7% | 62.6 -38% | 99 -2% | 42.9 -58% | 58.3 -42% | 97.5 ? -3% |
| Medical (medical-02) | 37.5 | 79.8 113% | 14.5 -61% | 56.1 50% | 24.9 -34% | 44.9 20% | 14 -63% | 32.8 -13% | 37.6 ? 0% |
| Showcase (showcase-02) | 31.2 | 30 -4% | 17.9 -43% | 36.3 16% | 23.9 -23% | 30.4 -3% | 16.8 -46% | 17.4 -44% | 35 ? 12% |
| Solidworks (sw-04) | 103 | 107 4% | 55.8 -46% | 107 4% | 66.6 -35% | 95 -8% | 54.1 -47% | 72.9 -29% | 76.6 ? -26% |
| SPECviewperf 2020 | 37% | -58% | 32% | -32% | 22% | -49% | -35% | 12% | |
| 3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 5.03 | 12 139% | 2.57 -49% | 9.65 92% | 5.22 4% | 8.59 71% | 3.37 -33% | 4.72 -6% | 7.74 ? 54% |
| 3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 10.6 | 15.4 45% | 3.02 -72% | 16.6 57% | 4.67 -56% | 16.9 59% | 7.39 -30% | 6.6 -38% | 10.8 ? 2% |
| 3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 29.5 | 31.4 6% | 15.3 -48% | 31.5 7% | 19.8 -33% | 28.9 -2% | 15.1 -49% | 17.5 -41% | 29.7 ? 1% |
| 3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 24.4 | 8.2 | 21.6 | 14.2 | 20.4 | 8.23 | 13.1 | 18.3 ? | |
| 3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 17.5 | 21 20% | 9.67 -45% | 20.1 15% | 10.8 -38% | 17.5 0% | 9.65 -45% | 9.26 -47% | 21.8 ? 25% |
| 3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 56.7 | 61.5 8% | 6.69 -88% | 62.2 10% | 42.1 -26% | 58.5 3% | 6.23 -89% | 33 -42% | 37.5 ? -34% |
| 3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 46.4 | 47.2 2% | 24 -48% | 50.1 8% | 27 -42% | 47.4 2% | 23.7 -49% | 29.5 -36% | 56.4 ? 22% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 29% /
28% | -55% /
-55% | 15% /
13% | -33% /
-33% | 6% /
5% | -54% /
-55% | -36% /
-35% | -1% /
-2% |
| 3DMark 05 Standard | 49103 points | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 34617 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 34600 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 10164 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 177096 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32862 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6420 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 3276 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2578 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
在 1080p 下，许多游戏都能以中等甚至更高的细节运行。不过，我们不能笼统地说 AMD Radeon 680M.如果内存速度稍快，iGPU 的内存分配更大，iGPU 的性能肯定会有所提高。不过，你不应该期望有明显的提升。如果你正在寻找一台纯粹用于游戏的微型电脑，你应该寻找配备专用显卡的设备。例如 Minisforum 海王星系列 HX77G或 Acemagic Tank03.不过，这些设备也要贵得多。
另一种选择是与 eGPU 结合使用，因为 Aoostar GOD77 具有 USB4 接口。在下面的章节中，我们将了解GPD G1 eGPU 的性能，它配备了AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT 。
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Borderlands 3 | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| 1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11) | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| GTA V | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Aoostar GOD77 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 147.3 | 134.5 | 48.7 | 20.4 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 119.3 | 76.6 | 36.3 | 22.7 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 140.9 | 115.1 | 89.1 | 84.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 62.1 | 32.8 | 23 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 62.7 | 49.8 | 41.6 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 67 | 39 | 35 | 34 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 137.5 | 54.2 | 45 | 39.1 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 85.9 | 36.1 | 33.9 | 28.8 |
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 60 | 38 | 35 | 33 |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 57.8 | 28.2 | 22.1 | 18.1 |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 84.9 | 38.5 | 24.5 | 19.3 |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 157.2 | 78.3 | 60.9 | 43 |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 156.3 | 79.3 | 58.6 | 25.9 |
| Far Cry 6 (2021) | 75.4 | 39 | 34.1 | |
| God of War (2022) | 33.4 | 23.6 | 18.4 | 13.4 |
| GRID Legends (2022) | 91 | 69.6 | 51.9 | 38.4 |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 54.7 | 40.5 | 28.2 | 22.6 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 77.1 | 66.9 | 50.1 | |
| F1 23 (2023) | 74.2 | 66.2 | 47.6 | |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 74.6 | 62.5 | 48.4 | 43.6 |
通过配备 GPD G1（AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT）的 eGPU 实现 3D 性能
Aoostar GOD77 有一个 USB4 端口，也支持外置显卡。与 GPD G1一起进行了一些合成测试，并测试了几款游戏，以了解其性能表现。由于采用了 USB4 连接，eGPU 只连接了四条 PCIe 3.0 通道。但 3D 性能却有明显提升。如果使用 OCuLink 接口，eGPU 与 Aoostar GOD77 结合使用，还能提供更高的性能。使用外部 AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT(GPD G1)，微型电脑可以享受到比 iGPU 更多的游戏。
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| 3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Unigine Superposition | |
| 1280x720 720p Low | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p High | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
| Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Extreme Preset DX11 | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| ComputeMark v2.1 | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Score | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (USB4 @PCIe x4 3.0) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 152.7 | 144.5 | 113.5 | 72.1 | 58.1 | 68.2 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 122.8 | 88.3 | 84.8 | 76.4 | 69 | 51.9 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 73.3 | 53.3 | 51.1 | 41.7 | 42.5 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 159.5 | 126.5 | 76 | 60.8 | 35.6 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 56.7 | 39.3 | 29 | 22.7 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 106 | 81 | 78 | 71 | 72 | 49 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 176 | 141.5 | 133.9 | 126.9 | 103.2 | 60.7 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 133.2 | 108.5 | 104.6 | 93.8 | 65.4 | 26.6 |
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 91 | 68 | 63 | 51 | 50 | 46 |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 86.7 | 73.9 | 67.1 | 62.5 | 55.5 | 31.5 |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 246 | 162.3 | 139.1 | 98 | 80.2 | 52 |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 187.5 | 150.5 | 98.2 | 69.7 | 59.3 | 32.9 |
| GRID Legends (2022) | 74.9 | 60.2 | 49 | 44 | 40.9 | 35.3 |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 158 | 122.5 | 80.8 | 68.2 | 49.1 | 17.4 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 96.5 | 88.8 | 71.9 | 33.3 | 23.8 | |
| F1 23 (2023) | 105.2 | 104 | 86.5 | 30.1 | 14.7 | |
| Lies of P (2023) | 124.7 | 106.5 | 102.6 | 100.3 | 73.6 | 38.1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 81.4 | 70.6 | 61.2 | 55.8 | 38.9 | 18.4 |
| Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 72 | 66 | 62 | 49 | 34 | 23 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 218.6 | 113.8 | 88 | 71 | 55.9 | 30.6 |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 49 | 45 | 38 | 31 | 22 | 6.5 |
排放 - Aoostar GOD77 的噪音也很大！
噪音排放
在我们的音量测量中，Aoostar GOD77 最初的表现并不明显。不过，风扇即使在空转时也不会停转，因此我们测得的声压级略低于 32 dB(A)。在负载和游戏时，微型电脑的声音虽然听得见，但很安静。不过，在压力测试中，CPU 风扇的转速确实很高。我们的测试样品的噪音远远超过 50 分贝（A），是本次对比中噪音最大的设备。值得肯定的是，Aoostar GOD77 没有产生任何高频风扇噪音。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 30.7 / 31.7 / 31.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 36.4 / 52.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Aoostar GOD77 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic AM20 R7 7735H, Radeon 680M | Morefine M600, 6600U R5 6600U, Radeon 660M | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | Geekom Mini IT12 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Maxtang MTN-FP750 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 10% | 8% | 2% | 11% | -3% | 7% | 8% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 24.8 1% | 30.2 -21% | 25.2 -1% | 29.4 -18% | 30 -20% | 29.8 -19% | 25 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.7 | 28.5 7% | 30.5 1% | 26.1 15% | 29.4 4% | 33.2 -8% | 29.9 3% | 25.3 18% |
| Idle Average * | 31.7 | 28.5 10% | 30.5 4% | 26.1 18% | 29.4 7% | 33.6 -6% | 30.1 5% | 25.3 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.8 | 28.7 10% | 30.5 4% | 26.4 17% | 29.5 7% | 33.6 -6% | 30.2 5% | 25.4 20% |
| Load Average * | 36.4 | 32.4 11% | 30.5 16% | 44.7 -23% | 29.6 19% | 36.8 -1% | 32.1 12% | 45.1 -24% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.5 | 32.7 8% | 43.3 -22% | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 52.4 | 39.6 24% | 30.5 42% | 45.4 13% | 29.6 44% | 39.8 24% | 32.5 38% | 45.3 14% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
机箱温度主要受两个方面影响：一方面是顶部，新鲜空气从顶部进入，为处理器降温，并从机箱两侧吹出。另一方面是底部，其表面温度明显更高。在压力测试中，这里的峰值略低于 48 °C。尽管如此，顶部的温度仍然很低，只有安装螺丝上有个别热点，因为这些螺丝是直接拧在散热器上的。
散热器 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS在我们的测试中达到了略低于 90°C 的温度，这并不严重，但代表了制造商设定的热极限。如果 SoC 达到这个值，功耗就会略有降低。在不到 50 瓦的情况下，处理器完成了压力测试，没有出现高功率损耗，这也是 Cinebench R15 连续循环性能始终稳定的原因。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.9 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.2 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.2 °C / 90 F.
耗电量
遗憾的是，Aoostar GOD77 的低功耗无法令人信服。我们的测量设备显示，空闲时的功耗约为 8 至 12 瓦。在平均负载情况下，电源的功耗略低于 78 瓦，而在峰值时则高达 93 瓦。比较显示，其能源需求与 Minisforum UM780 XTX 大致相当。配置类似的 Maxtang MTN-FP750 要经济得多，但在功耗方面限制了 SoC。100 瓦的电源装置始终能提供充足的电力，从未出现过超负荷的情况。与大多数微型 PC 不同，Aoostar GOD77 通过 USB-C 供电。
| Off / Standby | 2 / 2 Watt |
| Idle | 7.9 / 9.5 / 12.2 Watt |
| Load |
77.7 / 93.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Aoostar GOD77 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic AM20 R7 7735H, Radeon 680M | Morefine M600, 6600U R5 6600U, Radeon 660M | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | Geekom Mini IT12 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Maxtang MTN-FP750 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | Average AMD Radeon 680M | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -3% | -30% | 14% | 15% | 9% | 24% | 24% | 19% | -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.9 | 8.5 -8% | 12.1 -53% | 8.7 -10% | 8 -1% | 6.8 14% | 5 37% | 7 11% | 6.7 ? 15% | 9.48 ? -20% |
| Idle Average * | 9.5 | 10.5 -11% | 13 -37% | 9.5 -0% | 8.7 8% | 9.4 1% | 7 26% | 8.1 15% | 8.73 ? 8% | 11.5 ? -21% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12.2 | 12.9 -6% | 18.2 -49% | 10.3 16% | 8.8 28% | 13.7 -12% | 10.7 12% | 8.4 31% | 10.3 ? 16% | 14.9 ? -22% |
| Load Average * | 77.7 | 67.2 14% | 70.6 9% | 50.8 35% | 54.6 30% | 45.3 42% | 50.3 35% | 54.2 30% | 53.1 ? 32% | 57.4 ? 26% |
| Load Maximum * | 93.4 | 97.2 -4% | 113 -21% | 64.9 31% | 83.2 11% | 94.8 -1% | 82 12% | 61.4 34% | 70.3 ? 25% | 97.5 ? -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumtion with external monitor
Pros
Cons
结论 - 性能良好，价格公道
Aoostar GOD77 是一款结构紧凑的电脑，可以胜任多种任务。AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS 性能充足，主要是其强大的 iGPU 让人印象深刻。因此，AMD 目前的性能优于大多数英特尔同类产品。只有英特尔流星湖处理器才能大幅提升 3D 性能。Aoostar GOD77 适合休闲游戏玩家。不过，我们对小设备选项有一点意见，因为它只提供 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘。幸运的是，内存和大容量存储器可以互换。另外，你也可以选择 32 GB DDR5 内存和 1 TB SSD 的更好配置。
Aoostar GOD77 是一款奢华的迷你电脑，其性能和外观都给人留下了深刻印象。接口的成功选择也确保了良好的未来性。
从外观上看，Aoostar GOD77 绝对吸引眼球：加上 RGB 灯光，这款迷你电脑在人群中脱颖而出，具有明显的识别价值。如果您不喜欢彩色灯光，也可以将其关闭。我们喜欢手动控制配色方案，因为这意味着系统不会被不必要的问题软件所累。一个积极的亮点是良好的连接性，包括 USB4。
由于其他设备在效率方面略胜一筹，因此排放方面略显不足。噪音水平也可能是不购买它的一个原因。通过手动调节风扇转速，可以在一定程度上改善噪音。不过，峰值性能会受到一些影响。
价格和供应情况
Aoostar GOD77
- 04/11/2024 v7 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
