联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 笔记本电脑评测:三年来首次重大更新
在采用与 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9 相同的机箱设计之后 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9到 X1 Carbon G11新机型的推出恰逢英特尔推出新的 Meteor Lake-H 平台,因此用户也将获得最新的酷睿 Ultra 处理器。
我们的测试机配置了 Core Ultra 7 155H CPU、集成 Arc 8 GPU、32 GB LPDDR5x 6400 MHz 内存和非触摸式 1800p OLED 显示屏,售价约为 2700 美元。也有配备 16GB 内存和较低分辨率 IPS 面板的较低配置机型,但目前所有机型都配备了相同的处理器。
ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 的替代产品包括其他商务型 14 英寸子笔记本,如 戴尔Latitude 7440, 惠普 EliteBook 1040 系列, 华硕 ExpertBook 系列或 微软 Surface Laptop Studio 2.
更多联想评论
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.8 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.1 kg | 14.96 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 15.36 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.3 kg | 21.8 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
86.7 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
91.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Dell Latitude 7440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.2 kg | 17.95 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 比以前更精致、更轻巧
与之前的设计相比,新机箱在外观上有了一些变化。首先,网络摄像头部分经过重新设计,外盖上有一个小的光面条,以便安装更大的网络摄像头传感器,并作为打开盖子时的抓手。其次,底部和顶部边框比之前更薄,占地面积更小。第三,立体声扬声器被移至键盘下方,无需专用扬声器格栅。最后,键盘上的选择键增加了触觉标记,以帮助视力受损的用户。
点击板和底板上也有其他改动,但整体机身刚性和质感与以前相同,给人熟悉的 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 的感觉。需要注意的是,非触控 SKU 没有大猩猩玻璃保护,因此显示屏比 Spectre X360 14 的显示屏更容易损坏或扭曲。 Spectre X360 14.
如果说 X1 Carbon G11 还不够轻的话,那么新款 G12 则更轻了约 100 克,是你能买到的最轻的 14 英寸子笔记本之一。 LG Gram 14仍然更轻,不到 1 千克,但该机型目前仅有速度较慢的酷睿 u 版本可供选择。我们的联想还设法比许多竞争对手更小,包括 Latitude 7440和 EliteBook 1040。
连接性
交流
标配的英特尔 AX211 支持蓝牙 5.3 和 Wi-Fi 6E。与华硕 AXE11000 测试路由器配对时,我们没有遇到任何连接问题或异常情况。
网络摄像头
尽管机身有所改变,但网络摄像头传感器仍为 200 万像素,没有更高分辨率的选项。 Spectre x360 14提供 500 万像素选项。
红外和物理快门都是保护隐私的标准配置。
维护
底部面板仅用四颗十字螺丝固定,便于维修。正如下面的对比图片所示,内部结构已完全修改。尽管如此,升级选项仍保持不变,包括单个 M.2 2280 PCIe SSD 插槽、可拆卸 WAN 模块以及焊接 RAM 和 WLAN。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了文件和交流适配器外,没有任何其他附件。令人失望的是,如果在美国购买,制造商只提供一年有限保修,而不是某些 ThinkPad T 选件的基本三年保修。
输入设备 - 小巧而舒适
键盘
ThinkPad 的键盘是如此具有标志性,以至于联想在重新设计机箱时往往只做细微调整。这次,联想取消了 G11 键盘底部的专用 PrtSc 按钮,改用指纹识别器。PrtSc 按钮现在是 F9 按钮的一部分,视频会议热键也被取消,取而代之的是 Microsoft Snippet Tool 和 Phone Link。除此之外,对于现有的 ThinkPad 用户来说,输入体验应该是清晰而熟悉的。
触摸板
点击板现在比以前稍大一些,为 12 x 5.7 厘米。尤其是在 16:10 的高大屏幕上进行垂直光标移动时,仍然会感觉很拥挤,但专用的触感按键减轻了这种体验的痛苦。
显示屏
G12 今年新增了 120 Hz 显示屏,而 G11 则仅限于 60 Hz。更快的刷新率提高了用户界面的响应速度,这一点非常值得赞赏。除此之外,三星 OLED 面板、DCI-P3 色彩和 1800p 分辨率都与以前一样。遗憾的是,新面板不支持自适应同步或 Windows VRR,而这本可以改善电池续航时间。
需要注意的是,屏幕默认设置为 60 Hz,因此用户必须通过 "高级显示设置 "手动启用 120 Hz 模式。
根据配置的不同,还提供其他显示选项:
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,400 尼特,100% sRGB,亮面,触摸屏,60 赫兹
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,400 尼特,100% SRGB,亚光,触摸屏,60 赫兹
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,500 尼特,100% sRGB,亚光,非触摸屏,60 赫兹
- 2880 x 1800,OLED,400 尼特(HDR 500),100% DCi-P3,亚光,非触摸屏,120 赫兹
- 2880 x 1800,OLED,400 尼特(HDR 500),100% DCi-P3,亮面,触摸屏,120 赫兹
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 417 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.68
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Samsung ATNA40YK20-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 ATNA40YK15-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE Lenovo MNE007JA1-1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y Samsung ATNA40YK07-1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Latitude 7440 AU Optronics B140QAX, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | -19% | 0% | -3% | -15% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.7 | 99.9 0% | 69.4 -30% | 99.9 0% | 99.8 0% | 75.4 -24% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.2 | 97 -1% | 71.4 -27% | 98.3 0% | 89.3 -9% | 76.2 -22% |
Response Times | -34% | -4442% | -31% | 39% | -5004% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.91 ? | 1.19 ? -31% | 45.9 ? -4944% | 1.19 ? -31% | 0.77 ? 15% | 56 ? -6054% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.76 ? | 1.68 ? -121% | 30.7 ? -3939% | 1.62 ? -113% | 0.75 ? 1% | 30.8 ? -3953% |
PWM Frequency | 240.3 | 363 ? 51% | 362.3 ? 51% | 480 100% | ||
Screen | -144% | -30% | 0% | -4% | -90% | |
Brightness middle | 417 | 427 2% | 414 -1% | 336.6 -19% | 378 -9% | 517.3 24% |
Brightness | 417 | 427 2% | 392 -6% | 339 -19% | 384 -8% | 488 17% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 89 -9% | 98 0% | 97 -1% | 88 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.34 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.26 | 4.5 -257% | 1.9 -51% | 0.84 33% | 1.4 -11% | 3.3 -162% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.6 | 9.6 -167% | 3.6 -0% | 3.1 14% | 2.2 39% | 7.81 -117% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.68 | 5 -635% | 0.8 -18% | 1.02 -50% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 0.7 46% | 2.9 -123% | 1.4 -8% | 1.7 -31% | 5.6 -331% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.2 100% | 2.26 97% | 2.24 98% | 2.17 101% | 2.37 93% |
CCT | 6355 102% | 6470 100% | 6227 104% | 6439 101% | 6256 104% | 6804 96% |
Contrast | 1592 | 1521 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -59% /
-85% | -1497% /
-762% | -10% /
-8% | 11% /
7% | -1703% /
-890% |
* ... smaller is better
显示器开箱即进行了良好校准,平均 deltaE 值分别仅为 1.3 和 1.26。因此,大多数用户不需要进行最终用户校准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.76 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.41 ms rise | |
↘ 0.35 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.91 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.54 ms rise | |
↘ 0.37 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.3 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 240.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
脉调宽制或闪烁出现在所有亮度级别上,这是大多数 OLED 面板的典型特征。我们能检测到从 0 到 100% 亮度之间的频率恒定为 240 Hz。
400 尼特的亮度是高端亚笔记本电脑的平均水平,户外能见度一般。尽管 OLED 视角很宽,但在更亮的环境或阳光直射下,屏幕上的色彩会被冲淡。惠普的某些机型提供 1000尼特显示屏选项,而联想ThinkPad 仍未提供。
性能
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。联想 Vantage 中没有单独的电源配置文件来简化最终用户的设置数量。
处理器 - 性能一致性问题
Core Ultra 7 系列有效地取代了较早的 Core P 系列。 酷睿至尊 7 155H原始的多线程性能仅比 酷睿 i7-1370P快 5%到 15%,但如果考虑到节流或与使用酷睿 u 系列 cpu 的配置相比,差距就会明显拉大。即便如此,其性能仍与 Ryzen 7 7840U.
虽然前期性能不错,但处理器在长时间受压时会出现节流现象,这与我们在 X1 Carbon G11 上观察到的情况类似。例如,在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,2297 分的初始分数一开始会保持相对稳定,然后在压力测试进行到一半时急剧下降至 1444 分,降幅达37%。此后,性能会以非常缓慢的速度恢复,然后再次稳步下降,这在大多数其他笔记本电脑上是不常见的。重复压力测试不会导致任何重大差异,从而证实了我们的发现。对于像 X1 Carbon 这样轻薄的笔记本电脑来说,高 Turbo Boost 持续性并不值得期待,但性能一致性仍应是我们的目标。
至少,如下图所示,我们在配备酷睿 i7-1370P 的 2023 X1 Carbon G11 上记录到的不良节流行为没有那么严重。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=51) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=48) |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell Latitude 7440 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell Latitude 7440 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 7440 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
压力测试
在压力下,CPU 时钟频率会循环变化,而不是保持稳定。例如,在运行 Prime95 时,CPU 会提升至 3 GHz、105 C(!)和 54 W,持续时间只有几秒钟,然后降至 2.2 GHz,最终在 1.5 至 2.1 GHz、82 至 96 C 和 24 至 35 W 之间循环。 ThinkPad P14s在进行相同的 Prime95 测试时,时钟频率更稳定。
当运行时,也能观察到类似的 Witcher 3当运行时,也能观察到类似的结果。在这种情况下,GPU 会以 2250 MHz 的频率运行,但偶尔会无缘无故降至 1600 MHz。帧速率因此变得更加不稳定。整体核心温度在 80 至 95 摄氏度之间,而稍厚的Latitude 7440 核心温度为 65 至 80 摄氏度。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 43 |
Prime95 压力 | 1.5 - 2.1 | -- | 82 - 96 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.3 - 1.8 | 300 - 750 | 76 - 89 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 0.4 - 1.5 | 1600 - 2250 | 80 - 85 |
系统性能
PCMark 测试结果非常出色,分数始终高于我们在旧款 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 上记录的分数。最显著的提升体现在数字内容创建子测试中,在这项测试中,两代产品的 GPU 性能提升最为明显。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=32) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=32) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=32) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Dell Latitude 7440 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=32) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=32) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=31) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=31) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=31) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=32) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=27) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=33) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6751 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=46) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=46) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=46) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (116.2 - 233, n=46) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开主页的多个浏览器标签页时,LatencyMon 会显示 DPC 问题。以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频也非常完美,没有掉帧记录,这与我们在最近几款搭载 AMD 处理器的 Hawk Point 有关。 最近一些搭载 AMD 处理器的 Hawk Point 机型上出现的情况不同。.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配有 1 TB Kioxia XG8而不是去年版本的 WD PC SN810。如下图所示,我们在 X1 Carbon G11 上观察到,新硬盘的节流效果远不如 X1 Carbon G11;与 X1 Carbon G11 的 2300 MB/s 相比,传输速率在几分钟后就会从 6900 MB/s 降至 6000 MB/s。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
gpu 性能 - 英特尔的救赎之弧
新 Arc 8iGPU 与老旧的 Iris Xe 96 EUs提升了 70% 至 100%。事实上,ThinkPad X1 Carbon 系列已经连续几年使用相同的 Iris Xe 图形处理器,因此亟需升级到 Arc。
虽然与上一代产品相比,其性能提升令人印象深刻,但也只能勉强超过竞争对手的 Radeon 780M后者比英特尔的新解决方案早推出了近一年。不过,只要将图形设置调到较低,1080p 下的游戏还是很好玩的,甚至包括《博德之门3》这样的现代游戏。
整体性能可能不稳定。例如,如下表所示,在性能电源配置文件下运行时,Fire Strike ,与在电池电源下运行时的结果几乎相同,但在平衡模式下运行时,分数会大幅下降。在低温状态下重新测试,以考虑任何潜在的节流,结果也不会改善。
电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 8561 | 23177 | 3038 |
均衡模式 | 8036 (-6%) | 14084 (-39%) | 2471 (-19%) |
电池电量 | 8857 (+3%) | 24182 (+4%) | 3137 (+3%) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 12071 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 27018 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7874 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3341 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (33.8 - 57.6, n=10) | |
1920x1080 Low Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (21 - 40.3, n=21) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (16.3 - 31.1, n=22) | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (15.4 - 27.7, n=22) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (14.2 - 26.2, n=21) |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (77.4 - 96.1, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (44.9 - 54.6, n=11) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (35.3 - 45, n=11) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (24.7 - 31.6, n=11) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (20.2 - 25.9, n=11) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
Dell Latitude 7440 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (34.5 - 58, n=15) | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (11.3 - 38, n=33) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (9.42 - 31.4, n=30) | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7.3 - 27.6, n=32) |
怠速运行时的性能并不像我们希望的那样稳定。 Witcher 3并不像我们希望的那样稳定。帧速率会持续在 50 到 60 fps 之间波动,而不是保持恒定。如果系统必须节流,那么帧速率最好能逐渐降低,而不是持续波动。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 160.3 | 148.2 | 33.5 | 14.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 135.1 | 88.1 | 51.7 | 25.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 104.6 | 90.9 | 74.9 | 72.3 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 56.6 | 36.3 | 23.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 52.4 | 41 | 35.7 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 69 | 45 | 37 | 36 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 173.8 | 75.4 | 59.7 | 47 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 53.8 | 42.6 | 31.5 | 25 |
F1 22 (2022) | 72.4 | 67 | 51.1 | 14.1 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 36.9 | 30.2 | 26.8 | 24.4 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 31.7 | 26.5 | 22.5 |
排放量
系统噪音 - 平静安宁
风扇噪音总体上比 G11 小。尽管上面提到了循环性能结果,但风扇在负载情况下明显没有脉动。在长时间运行或其他需求负载时,我们能记录到最高 38 dB(A) 的噪音,与 ThinkPad P14 不相上下。 Witcher 3或其他需求负载时的最大噪音为 38 分贝(A),与 ThinkPad P14 不相上下。但是,对于更典型的浏览或视频流负载,风扇噪音会在 26 dB(A) 左右徘徊,而安静的背景噪音为 24 dB(A),几乎听不到。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 24 dB(A) |
Load |
| 31.5 / 37.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1370P, WDC PC SN810 2TB | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X162N | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y Vega 8, R7 7730U, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04 | Dell Latitude 7440 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | 3% | -10% | 7% | 8% | |
off / environment * | 23.8 | 23.3 2% | 22.4 6% | 22.6 5% | 23.4 2% | 22.8 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 23.3 3% | 22.4 7% | 22.6 6% | 23.4 2% | 22.8 5% |
Idle Average * | 24 | 23.3 3% | 22.4 7% | 22.6 6% | 23.4 2% | 22.8 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 24 | 23.3 3% | 22.4 7% | 22.6 6% | 25.6 -7% | 22.8 5% |
Load Average * | 31.5 | 35.9 -14% | 31.3 1% | 40.7 -29% | 25.6 19% | 26.3 17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.8 | 41 -8% | 39.5 -4% | 46.6 -23% | 30.9 18% | 30 21% |
Load Maximum * | 37.8 | 40.9 -8% | 39.2 -4% | 52.5 -39% | 32.6 14% | 38.3 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于采用了内部散热解决方案,表面温度的变化在很大程度上是对称的。在玩游戏或运行其他要求较高的负载时,键盘中心和底盖上的热点温度可高达 43 摄氏度。不过,这仍然比我们在旧款 G11 上记录到的温度低几摄氏度,与 Zenbook 14 运行较慢的 Ryzen 7 7730U 时的温度相当。掌托和键盘的大部分区域都没有出现令人不舒服的发热现象,但底部一些较大的通风栅还是可以改善温度。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.6 °C / 78.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+2 °C / 3.6 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -5% | 4% | 8% | 11% | 7% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.2 | 42.2 5% | 41.1 7% | 40.9 7% | 39.3 11% | 39 12% |
Maximum Bottom * | 41.2 | 43.8 -6% | 48.2 -17% | 46.8 -14% | 45 -9% | 40.6 1% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.4 | 32 -9% | 26.5 10% | 24.1 18% | 23.8 19% | 28 5% |
Idle Bottom * | 31.2 | 33.7 -8% | 26.9 14% | 24.6 21% | 24 23% | 28.8 8% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 提高每瓦性能
耗电量
在最低亮度设置下闲置在桌面上的耗电量仅为 4 瓦,而在全白屏幕上最大亮度设置需要 4 倍的耗电量。用户在发送电子邮件或处理电子表格时,应尽量节省电能,因为在 oled 面板上,白色需要更多的电能。
运行游戏等高负载时的耗电量比去年的 G11 机型高出约 10%至 15%。不过,与上面提到的较旧的 Iris Xe 96 EU 相比,GPU 性能提高了 2 倍,因此稍高的功耗也是值得的。
如下面的截图所示,在运行 Prime95 压力测试时,我们可以记录到小巧(约 8.8 x 5.2 x 2.3 厘米)的 65 W AC 适配器的临时最大功耗为 68 W。
Off / Standby | 0.12 / 0.48 Watt |
Idle | 3.9 / 5.8 / 16 Watt |
Load |
46.1 / 67.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN810 2TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X162N, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y R7 7730U, Vega 8, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Latitude 7440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | 17% | -23% | 25% | 5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 7 -79% | 2.9 26% | 7.9 -103% | 3.2 18% | 4.5 -15% |
Idle Average * | 5.8 | 7.9 -36% | 5.1 12% | 8.8 -52% | 4.2 28% | 6.5 -12% |
Idle Maximum * | 16 | 8.1 49% | 5.6 65% | 14.7 8% | 4.9 69% | 7.3 54% |
Load Average * | 46.1 | 40.5 12% | 51.2 -11% | 46.9 -2% | 40.5 12% | 52.5 -14% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.4 | 43 15% | 49.9 1% | 44.9 11% | 37.9 25% | 46.2 8% |
Load Maximum * | 67.4 | 66 2% | 60.2 11% | 65.2 3% | 68.6 -2% | 63 7% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
寿命
尽管电池容量与前代产品相比没有变化,但运行时间却有所增加。 与去年的 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 相比,我们在平衡配置文件下浏览网页的时间仅延长了一个多小时,无线局域网总运行时间接近 8 小时。 ThinkPad P14s G4或 ZenBook 14,但这两款产品分别采用了分辨率更低的 IPS 面板和容量更大的电池。
从电空充至满电只需不到两个小时。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, 52 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y R7 7730U, Vega 8, 75 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 68 Wh | Dell Latitude 7440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 57 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -2% | 19% | 83% | 52% | 78% | |
Reader / Idle | 1069 | 1107 4% | 1427 33% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 466 | 389 -17% | 685 47% | 725 56% | 555 19% | 781 68% |
Load | 70 | 80 14% | 63 -10% | 203 190% | 129 84% | 164 134% |
H.264 | 592 | 999 |
Pros
Cons
评语:Cpu 故障让出色的重新设计黯然失色
在我们对 2023 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11的评测中,我们称赞了它的设计和舒适的输入体验,同时也批评了它不均衡的性能和令人失望的电池续航时间。在 2024 年的改版中,最新机型在 G11 的大部分方面都有所改进,值得拥有老一代机型的用户升级。更快的原生刷新率、更轻的重量和更长的电池续航时间,使用户体验明显更加流畅,使用起来更加愉悦,尤其是对于经常出差的人来说。
新设计比以前更轻、更小、更快、更舒适。不过,低分辨率网络摄像头的老化情况不是很好,性能有时会不稳定。
处理器性能仍然是这一优秀系统的一个症结所在。时钟频率的循环和波动比我们希望的要频繁得多,就像去年的 G11 一样。即使考虑到任何节流行为,新的 Meteor Lake-H CPU 仍然比上一代的 Raptor Lake-P 更快,但在压力下更稳定的性能还是更可取的。值得庆幸的是,除了最核心的用户外,其他用户都不会注意到这一特定的缺点。
竞争机型,如 戴尔Latitude 7440或 惠普 Spectre x360 14提供更高分辨率的网络摄像头或 360 度铰链,可能会吸引某些使用场景。我们当然不指望 2025 年会有什么重大的重新设计,但与性能稳定性和老化的 200 万像素网络摄像头有关的小规模升级应该是联想要做的事情的重中之重。
价格和供应情况
联想现已开始发售ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12,16 GB 配置的起价为 2300 美元,如果配置 32 GB 内存,则起价为 2700 美元。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12
- 02/23/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.