Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro 评测--运行时间改进,性能更佳
新款 MacBook Pro 14 现在有了更多的变体,作为用户,要对它们一目了然并非易事。我们已经测试了两款,即配备普通 M3 SoC 的全新 基本机型,配备普通的 M3 SoC和 配备 M3 Max 的高端版本.现在,我们来看看配备超薄型 M3 Pro 的机型,售价为 2,499 美元。除 M3 Pro 外,该机型还配备了 14 核 GPU、18 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘。该机型可能是许多用户最感兴趣的选择,因为它是配备 Pro SoC 的最便宜的 MBP 14。
MBP 14 M3 | MBP 14 M3 Pro | MBP 14 M3 Pro | MBP 14 M3 Max | MBP 14 M3 Max | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPU | Apple M3 8 个 CPU 内核 (4P & 4E) |
Apple M3 Pro 11 个 CPU 内核 (5P & 6E) |
Apple M3 Pro 12 个 CPU 内核 (6P & 6E) |
Apple M3 Max 14 个 CPU 内核 (10P & 4E) |
Apple M3 Max 16 个 CPU 内核 (12P & 4E) |
GPU | 10 个 GPU 内核 | 14 个 GPU 内核 | 18 个 GPU 内核 | 30 个 GPU 内核 | 40 个 GPU 内核 |
内存 | 8GB (16/24GB) | 18GB (36GB) | 18GB (36GB) | 36GB (96GB) | 48GB (64/128GB) |
SSD | 512 GB (1/2 TB) | 512 GB (1/2/4 TB) | 1 TB (2/4 TB) | 1 TB (2/4/8 TB) | 1 TB (2/4/8 TB) |
内存带宽 | 100 GB/s | 150 GB/s | 150 GB/s | 300 GB/s | 400 GB/s |
连接 | 2x USB-C 4.0,带 Thunderbolt 3 HDMI、SD 读卡器 |
3x USB-C 4.0,带 Thunderbolt 4 HDMI、SD 读卡器 |
3x USB-C 4.0,带 Thunderbolt 4 HDMI、SD 读卡器 |
3x USB-C 4.3x USB-C 4.0,带 Thunderbolt 4 HDMI、SD 读卡器 |
3x USB-C 4.0,带 Thunderbolt 4 HDMI、SD 读卡器 |
价格 | 1,999 美元起 | 2,499 美元起 | 2,999 美元起 | 3,999 美元起 | 4,574 美元起 |
当然,小型 MacBook Pro 14 也可以配备完整版的 M3 Pro(6 个性能内核而不是 5 个,18 个 GPU 内核而不是 14 个)。 MacBook Pro 16.由于我们测试设备的机箱、连接和输入设备与配备 M3 Max 的 MBP 14 没有任何区别,因此我们在这次评测中主要关注笔记本电脑的性能、排放和运行时间。有关这些主题的更多信息,请阅读我们对 MBP 14 M3 Max 的详细评测:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
93.2 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, M3 Pro 14-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 | |
90.4 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 M3, M3 10-Core GPU | 1.5 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 | |
93.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry M2 Pro 10-Core, M2 Pro 16-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 | |
89.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.20" | 3120x2080 | |
89.8 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 17.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.2 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 R7 7840S, Radeon 780M | 1.3 kg | 13.9 mm | 14.50" | 2944x1840 |
与 MacBook Pro 14 M3 的区别
配备 M3 Pro 的 MacBook Pro 14 的连接和散热装置与我们已经全面测试过的配备 M3 Max 的配置相同。这意味着它有两个风扇和包括 Thunderbolt 4 在内的三个 USB-C 4.0 端口,而配备 M3 SoC 的全新 MacBook Pro 14 基本型号只有一个风扇和两个 USB-C 4.0 端口,且仅限于 Thunderbolt 3。
该机箱有银色和全新的太空黑两种颜色可供选择,不过后者更像是一种深灰色,与黑色键盘的反差仍然很大。它的表面不像目前MacBook Air M2 的深蓝色 "午夜 "配色那样容易沾染指纹,但即便如此,你还是得经常擦拭。配备 M3 Pro 的 MBP 14 可以同时为两台外接显示器供电,这比配备普通 M3 SoC 的基本机型更具优势。
性能 - 3 纳米制程带来更高的性能和效率
处理器 - 配备 5 个高性能内核的 M3 Pro
新 M3 Pro的核心配置与旧的 M2 Pro.M2 Pro 的集群(性能和效率)由 4 个内核组成,在较小的 10 内核型号上,每个集群只有 4 个 P 内核中的 3 个处于活动状态,加上 4 个 E 内核,总共有 10 个内核。在新款 M3 Pro 上,现在有两个集群,每个集群有 6 个内核,但在我们的小机型上,6 个 P 内核中只有 5 个处于活动状态。加上 6 个 E 核心,这意味着它是一个 11 核心的 CPU。这些内核本身的技术规格与其他 M3 SoC 相同,性能内核的频率最高可达 4.056 GHz,效率内核的频率最高可达 2.748 GHz。这在实际使用中得到了证实。此外,其内存接口速度从 M2 Pro 的 256 位降至 192 位。因此,其最大内存带宽从 200 GB/s 降至 150 GB/s。
完整版的 M3 Pro 有 12 个内核,在最大负载下的功耗为 26-27 瓦,而较小的 11 核型号功耗仅为 23-24 瓦。旧版 10 核 M2 的功耗也约为 27 瓦。在多核测试中,"小 "版 M3 Pro 的表现非常出色,介于 10 核的旧版 M2 Pro 和 12 核的 M2 Pro 之间,即便如此,两者之间的差距也从未超过 10%。相比之下,配备全部 6 个 P 内核的大型 M3 Pro 则快了约 12%,在实际使用中达到了与配备 12 个内核的旧款 M2 Pro 相同的性能水平。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Average of class Multimedia (398 - 2069, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
Average of class Multimedia (100.7 - 178, n=31, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core () | |
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 25760, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Multimedia (167 - 946, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max |
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU
* ... smaller is better
与英特尔和 AMD 相比,要想获得更好的多核性能,就必须选择 45 瓦范围内的芯片。酷睿 i7-13700H 酷睿 i7-13700H在 申克 Vision 1445/40 瓦的功耗相对较低,但速度仍然较慢。AMD 的 Ryzen 7 7840S在 联想 Yoga Slim 7 14(52/42瓦)的速度更快,但AMD和英特尔的U和P型号却落败了。
在单核测试中,情况变得更加明朗,Apple ,其新的 P 核心取得了胜利(与 M2 代相比提高了 20%),将 AMD 和英特尔的竞争对手甩在了身后。目前,要想获得更好的单核性能,还需要具有极高单核涡轮时钟频率的 Core-i9 CPU。
与往常一样,在不连接电源的情况下,它的 CPU 性能完全保持不变。我们运行了常用的 Cinebench R15 多循环,但必须注意的是,由于是模拟运行,其性能略有下降。不过,与旧版M2 Pro 相比,我们还是发现了一点优势--循环测试向我们清楚地表明,它的 CPU 性能在长期负载下依然保持稳定。更多 CPU 基准测试请访问。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
系统性能
每台配备Apple M SoC 的 MacBook Pro(无论 M1、M2 还是 M3)都具有极高的主观性能,而新的 M3 Pro改进的单核性能进一步证实了这一点。所有使用都能快速启动(即使是复杂的应用程序),本地应用程序也运行良好。在跨平台的 CrossMark 测试中,MBP 14 M3 Pro 只得向拥有更快 M3 Pro 的 MBP 16 认输。 MBP 16 与速度更快的 M3 Pro- 超过了其 Windows 竞争对手。总的来说,最小的 MacBook Pro 14 非常适合视频和照片编辑。
得益于 Rosetta 2,英特尔 Mac 的程序可以被模拟,总的来说,效果不错。不过,这也会牺牲一些性能,尤其是在使用更复杂的程序时。即便如此,我们还是进行了 Adobe Photoshop 的 PugetBench 测试,笔记本电脑的成绩还是非常可观的。遗憾的是,Premier Pro 的 PugetBench 测试运行得并不流畅,经常出现死机现象。
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test: 12:1 8K CPU | 12:1 8K Metal
Photoshop PugetBench: Overall Score | GPU Score | General Score | Filter Score
Jetstream 2: Total Score
Speedometer 2.0: Result
WebXPRT 3: Overall
CrossMark / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU () | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU () | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU () | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry |
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU | |
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 91, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 |
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal | |
Average of class Multimedia (67 - 379, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 |
Photoshop PugetBench / Overall Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (947 - 1442, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry |
Photoshop PugetBench / GPU Score | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average of class Multimedia (92 - 146.8, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry |
Photoshop PugetBench / General Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (106.2 - 165, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry |
Photoshop PugetBench / Filter Score | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU () | |
Average of class Multimedia (81.8 - 123.3, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry |
Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average of class Multimedia (150.6 - 376, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry |
Speedometer 2.0 / Result | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU () | |
Average of class Multimedia (169 - 820, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU () | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF |
存储设备
MacBook Pro 14 通常仍然标配 512GB SSD(AP0512Z)。在 MacBook Pro 14 上使用了更少的 NAND 芯片。 MacBook Pro 14 与 M2 Pro上使用的 NAND 芯片较少,这对其传输速率产生了负面影响。因此,更令我们惊讶的是,这个版本又安装了四个 NAND 芯片,我们已经在较大的 MacBook Pro 16.它的传输速率再次提高,我们注意到最大读取速率约为 6 GB/s,写入速率约为 4.5 GB/s。首次启动设备后,用户可以访问 512GB 中的 458GB。更多的固态硬盘基准测试可在我们的 技术部分。
图形卡
较小的 M3 Pro SoC 还安装了较弱的图形卡--该型号的 GPU 内核不是 18 个,而是 14 个。我们无法读取它的时钟频率,但我们可以假设它的性能比旧款 M2 Pro 有所提高,因为它的性能比旧款 M2 Pro 的 16 核 GPU 更好。 旧款 M2 Pro 的 16 核 GPU的 16 核 GPU 更好。在 3DMark WildLife Extreme Unlimited 测试中,新款 M3 Pro GPU 的多核 CPU 性能与 M2 Pro 基本持平。唯一的例外是在 GFX Bench 测试中,两款 GPU 的表现几乎相同。与 配备普通 M3 的 MBP 14相比,它的优势相当大,根据不同的基准测试,我们注意到它的性能提高了 40-50%。与处理器相同,GPU 的最大功耗约为 24 瓦,低于 M2 Pro(约 26-27 瓦)。
与 AMD 和英特尔的 iGPU 相比,新的 M3 Pro GPU 明显处于领先地位。 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti之间。 申克 Vision 14和 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑中的 联想 Yoga Pro 9 14.
作为Apple 的典型代表,它的性能在使用电池时完全保持稳定,即使在连续负载的情况下,我们也没有发现任何性能损失。更多 GPU 基准测试请参见。
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在其他评测中,我们已经提到有几种不同的方式可以在 MacBook 上玩游戏。除了模拟游戏或 CrossOver 等附加软件外,如今你还可以运行很多游戏(例如《GTA V 》或《 TheWitcher 3 》)。不过,硬件并非总能充分发挥其潜力,当然也缺少一些优化。
不出所料,原生游戏运行得最好--如今,这包括许多 AAA 级游戏,如《博德之门 3》或《无主之地》。它们在 MacBook Pro 上运行得非常好,通常甚至可以使用最高设置。遗憾的是,与 Windows 设备相比,MacBook Pro 的游戏性能已经远远低于一台 GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑和旧版 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti.如果你想时不时地在 MacBook 上玩几把游戏,那么它有限的游戏选择一定会让你满意,绝对不会让你失望。尽管如此,你必须意识到这并不是一台游戏笔记本电脑。
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 79 | 50 | |||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 39 | ||||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 66 | 60 | 53 | 34 | |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 75 | 49.5 | 35.9 | 22.5 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 42 | 39 | |||
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 193 | 125 | 67 | 53 | 35 |
排放物 - 仅在最大负荷时才有响声
噪音排放
几乎在任何情况下,MacBook Pro 14 都证明是一款安静的伴侣。在正常使用过程中,如上网冲浪(甚至使用大量标签页)和播放视频,你可能永远听不到风扇的声音,即使在 CPU 或 GPU 满负荷运行的情况下,风扇也能以每分钟 2,400-2,800 转的最大速度转动。在这样的转速下,风扇的声音几乎听不到--我们测得的噪音值仅为 25.1-25.6 dB(A)。不过,由于芯片温度必须达到 100 °C以上才能启动风扇,因此风扇有时甚至需要几分钟才能启动。
玩游戏时,这主要取决于你玩的是什么游戏。大多数情况下,风扇转速在 2,400 至 2,800 转/分钟之间,只有《博德之门 3》的风扇转速达到了 3,400 转/分钟。在压力测试中,我们将处理器和显卡置于最大负载下,笔记本电脑的声音才真正变大。在这项测试中,我们注意到每分钟有 6,200-6,300 次旋转,声音高达 49.4 dB(A),清晰可闻。与配备 M3 Max 的
MacBook Pro 14 相比,我们没有发现线圈啸叫。<br />Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.1 / 24.1 / 24.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 25.1 / 49.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.1 dB(A) |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP1024Z | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840S, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 0% | 3% | -15% | -31% | -19% | -21% | -25% | -11% | |
off / environment * | 24.1 | 24.2 -0% | 23.6 2% | 25.4 -5% | 24.8 -3% | 24 -0% | 24.5 -2% | 24.5 -2% | 24.8 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.1 | 24.2 -0% | 23.6 2% | 25.4 -5% | 24.8 -3% | 24 -0% | 24.5 -2% | 24.5 -2% | 24.8 -3% |
Idle Average * | 24.1 | 24.2 -0% | 23.6 2% | 25.4 -5% | 24.8 -3% | 24 -0% | 24.5 -2% | 24.5 -2% | 24.8 -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.1 | 24.2 -0% | 23.6 2% | 29.6 -23% | 24.8 -3% | 35.71 -48% | 30.4 -26% | 27.7 -15% | 24.8 -3% |
Load Average * | 25.1 | 25.1 -0% | 24.2 4% | 42 -67% | 47.4 -89% | 39.5 -57% | 45.5 -81% | 25.8 -3% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 25.1 | 25.1 -0% | 52.9 -111% | 40.22 -60% | 41.7 -66% | 45.5 -81% | 43.4 -73% | ||
Load Maximum * | 49.4 | 48.5 2% | 47.5 4% | 40.9 17% | 52.9 -7% | 51.93 -5% | 44.9 9% | 45.5 8% | 43.4 12% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
MBP 14 的内部温度很高,因为 M3 Pro 在负载情况下的温度经常超过 100 °C。Apple ,其表面温度得到了很好的控制,即使在压力测试中,我们将笔记本放在大腿上也没有问题。在这种情况下,我们测得键盘底部最高温度为 38 °C,键盘中部上方最高温度为 42 °C。这意味着你的手指在打字时可能会有点发热。我们的 Witcher 3测试显示了笔记本电脑最糟糕的情况,因为风扇都不太活跃,导致设备总体温度升高--我们在很多地方测得的温度都超过了 40 °C。尽管如此,这款笔记本电脑从未受到任何限制。在执行简单任务时,其外壳几乎不会发热。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.4 °C / 95.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.6 °C / -11.9 F).
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840S, AMD Radeon 780M | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | -4% | -31% | -23% | -17% | -15% | -19% | -6% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 41.3 2% | 47 -12% | 46.5 -11% | 41 2% | 42 -0% | 45.8 -9% | 43.8 -4% | 45.9 -9% |
Maximum Bottom * | 38.3 | 39.6 -3% | 42.8 -12% | 44.7 -17% | 56.7 -48% | 52 -36% | 42 -10% | 56 -46% | 42.1 -10% |
Idle Upper Side * | 23 | 23.2 -1% | 22.3 3% | 34.9 -52% | 27.4 -19% | 26 -13% | 27.5 -20% | 25.3 -10% | 23.4 -2% |
Idle Bottom * | 22.8 | 23.3 -2% | 21.7 5% | 32.9 -44% | 29.1 -28% | 27 -18% | 27.1 -19% | 26.7 -17% | 23.8 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在综合 CPU/GPU 负载的压力测试中,MacBook Pro 14 的性能在开始时略有下降,然后就可以使用 M3 Pro 的全部功率--这是因为风扇延迟启动的缘故。在性能下降之后,笔记本电脑的性能完全保持稳定,我们注意到 70 瓦电源和 96 瓦电源之间没有性能差异。为了进行比较,我们还将较大的 MacBook Pro 16 与完整的 M3 Pro 进行了比较。在现阶段,我们还不能确定更小巧的 MBP 14 能否在压力测试中充分发挥速度更快的 M3 Pro 的优势。
发言人
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 改进运行时间
耗电量
MacBook 的最大闲置功耗为 13 瓦,略高于配备 M3 的新 MBP 14。总的来说,M3 Pro 的效率也很高,在最高 SDR 亮度下,纯 CPU/GPU 负载时的功耗仍远低于 50 瓦。在压力测试中,我们注意到功耗超过了 70 瓦,这意味着所提供的 70 瓦电源无法提供所需的功率。如果两个组件都长期处于负载状态,那么电池就会慢慢耗尽。在一小时的压力测试中,我们注意到电池耗尽了 3%。在使用功率更大的电源时,我们注意到最大消耗功率为 80 瓦,然后在 76 瓦左右达到平衡。
这显然是Apple 为省钱而采取的一个不必要的步骤。毕竟,这已经不再是 MacBook Pro 14 的基本机型了,所以你确实应该能够充分利用 M3 Pro 的全部性能,而无需消耗电池电量。
Off / Standby | 0.16 / 0.33 Watt |
Idle | 2.3 / 13.1 / 13.3 Watt |
Load |
47.4 / 73.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 M3, M3 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry M2 Pro 10-Core, M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 R7 7840S, Radeon 780M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2944x1840, 14.5" | Average Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 13% | -1% | -12% | -143% | -59% | -1% | -52% | 0% | -55% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.3 | 2.2 4% | 2.5 -9% | 4.1 -78% | 10.9 -374% | 7.4 -222% | 4.2 -83% | 8.7 -278% | 2.3 ? -0% | 6.54 ? -184% |
Idle Average * | 13.1 | 12 8% | 12.1 8% | 6.6 50% | 17.7 -35% | 8.3 37% | 7.4 44% | 11.3 14% | 13.1 ? -0% | 11.3 ? 14% |
Idle Maximum * | 13.3 | 12.2 8% | 12.3 8% | 8 40% | 19.3 -45% | 8.7 35% | 8 40% | 12 10% | 13.3 ? -0% | 13.3 ? -0% |
Load Average * | 47.4 | 36.4 23% | 49.8 -5% | 61 -29% | 93.3 -97% | 76 -60% | 42.8 10% | 58.6 -24% | 47.4 ? -0% | 70.7 ? -49% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.8 | 31.9 25% | 46.6 -9% | 56 -31% | 129.5 -203% | 70 -64% | 47.9 -12% | 61.6 -44% | ||
Load Maximum * | 73.6 | 66.7 9% | 71.4 3% | 90 -22% | 150.2 -104% | 132 -79% | 76 -3% | 66.2 10% | 73.6 ? -0% | 116.1 ? -58% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
现在,该设备的电池容量为 72.6 瓦时,再加上其低耗电值,因此运行时间极长。与旧款 M2 相比,我们注意到它有了很大的改进。在亮度为 150 cd/m²(将最大 SDR 亮度降低 7 个大档位和 3 个小档位)的情况下,我们的视频测试持续了略多于 20 个小时,比上一代产品多了 3.5 个小时。HDR 视频在最大亮度下可持续约 7 小时。在无线局域网测试中,我们注意到它的续航时间为 16.5 小时,同样比 M2 Pro MBP 14 延长了 3.5 小时。在全亮度 SDR 的 WLAN 测试中,新机型的表现更差,仅为 6:21 小时(少了半小时)。不过,这主要是由于 SDR 亮度从 500 cd/m² 提高到 600 cd/m²。
因此,MacBook Pro 14 M3 Pro 与配备 M3 SoC 的基本型号相比,表现要好于 M3 Max 变体。其 Windows 竞争对手也无法追赶这些成绩。只有在使用 SoC 的全部性能和全 SDR 亮度的情况下,笔记本电池的耗时才能略微超过一小时。反过来,你必须注意到,在电池电量达到 3% 时,其性能甚至不会降低。而 Windows 系统的竞争对手(尤其是配备 dGPU 的产品)则无法做到这一点。设备充满电需要大约 2 个小时,大约 1 个小时后电池电量就已达到 80%。
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, 72.6 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 M3, M3 10-Core GPU, 70 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry M2 Pro 10-Core, M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, 70 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 75 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 99 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14APU G8 R7 7840S, Radeon 780M, 70 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, 72.6 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 6% | -20% | -12% | -37% | -17% | -16% | -34% | -8% | -13% | |
H.264 | 1213 | 1143 -6% | 982 -19% | 527 -57% | 547 -55% | 690 -43% | 1077 -11% | 847 ? -30% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 979 | 951 -3% | 774 -21% | 580 -41% | 477 -51% | 457 -53% | 823 -16% | 571 -42% | 911 -7% | 640 ? -35% |
Load | 77 | 98 27% | 124 61% | 72 -6% | 92 19% | 64 -17% | 73 -5% | 97.1 ? 26% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - MBP 14 与 M3 Pro 搭配使用效果更佳
配备超薄 M3 Pro SoC 的新款 MacBook Pro 14 可能不再是 MacBook 14 的基本机型,但它给人的印象要比配备普通 M3 处理器的廉价机型好得多。特别是它额外的 USB-C 端口、18 GB 内存和更快的固态硬盘,都是购买 M3 Pro 机型的明确理由。与 M3 基本配置相比,这款笔记本的多核性能和图形处理性能也是一大优势。
相比之下,如果要将该机型与 M2 Pro 机型进行比较,情况就有些困难了。它的单核性能要好得多,运行时间也更长--但这些肯定不是升级的紧迫理由。我们甚至不能完全建议配备 M1 Pro 的 MacBook Pro 14 用户选择新的升级版本--如果你目前还在使用老款英特尔 MacBook,或者这将是你第一次购买 MBP 14,那么新的 MacBook Pro 14 M3 Pro 会更有吸引力。
性能更强,运行时间更长:在 M3 Pro 的帮助下,MacBook Pro 14 的性能再次得到提升,总的来说,与采用普通 M3 SoC 的新款 MacBook Pro 14 基本型号相比,M3 Pro 是更好的选择。
如果你决定购买,你将得到一台最好的多媒体笔记本电脑,它集卓越性能、静音风扇、高品质机箱、具有最佳 HDR 功能的出色显示屏、令人印象深刻的扬声器和超长运行时间于一身。当然,也有一些 Windows 笔记本电脑能在个别领域提供更好的性能,而配备专用GeForce GPU 的设备在游戏方面无疑是佼佼者。反过来,在风扇和运行时间方面,你也必须做出一些妥协。
MacBook Pro 14 绝非完美,我们对它的批评与对其他配置的批评如出一辙。它最大的问题之一是几乎没有维护和扩展选项,再加上Apple 在购买更大的固态硬盘和更多内存时收取的巨额附加费。它的键盘也可以做得更好一些,而且我们仍然不得不放弃 Face ID。此外,你还可以批评制造商只为该机型提供 70 瓦电源的决定。这对 M3 机型来说已经足够,但在极端情况下,这对 M3 Pro 来说就不够用了,笔记本电脑不得不使用电池来确保获得足够的电力。诚然,这只是在极端情况下,它的性能不会受到负面影响,但由于它不再是基本型号,而且售价高达 2,500 美元,你至少希望它的电源能提供足够的能量。
价格和供应情况
配备 M3 Pro 和 1 TB SSD 的 MacBook Pro 14 目前在亚马逊的售价为 2,598.96 美元。
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
- 12/06/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.