
微星超薄 GF63 12VE 笔记本电脑评测: GeForce 配备 8GB 内存的 RTX 4050 游戏本
偷工减料太多。
微星最便宜的 15.6 英寸游戏笔记本电脑采用了 144 Hz IPS 屏幕、GeForce RTX 4050 显卡和酷睿-H 系列处理器等现代功能。不过,你最好不要选择某些型号,尤其是内存只有 8 GB 的型号。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
结论 - 获取 16 GB 配置
低于 900 美元的价位足以让任何经济型玩家对微星 GF63 产生兴趣。微星 GF63 的规格符合很多标准,包括 144 Hz 快速刷新率、GeForce RTX 4050 GPU、相对较新的第 12 代酷睿 i5 或 i7 H 系列 CPU 和 512 GB 存储空间。这款机器的核心性能并不慢,而且现在GeForce RTX 50 笔记本电脑上市后,它的价格只会越来越低。微星系统也比许多替代产品更轻,包括 宏碁 Nitro V 15或 联想 LOQ 15.
遗憾的是,用户体验与 2020 型号这意味着机箱仍然给人廉价的感觉,而且任何终端用户的维修都需要破坏防篡改的出厂贴纸。因此,应避免购买配备 8GB 内存的机型,因为有限的内存会影响整体性能,而出厂贴纸则会阻碍任何形式的升级。
Pros
Cons
GF63 是微星价格最低的游戏笔记本电脑系列,专为预算有限、希望获得GeForce RTX 显卡而又不喜欢繁琐配置的玩家设计。距离我们评测上一款 GF63 已经过去了 5 年,因此这款最新型号配备了更新的英特尔 Alder Lake 和 Ada Lovelace GPU 选项。
我们的测试机是一种低端配置,在 Target 和亚马逊等零售商处广泛销售。它配备了酷睿 i5-12450H、6 GB RTX 4050、8 GB 内存和 144 Hz 1080p IPS 显示屏,售价约为 850 到 900 美元。此外,还提供配备酷睿 i7-12650H、RTX 4060 和双倍内存的 SKU。
竞争对手包括联想 LOQ 15、华硕 TUF A15 或宏碁 Nitro V 15 等其他入门级游戏笔记本电脑。
更多微星评论:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
案例
连接性
交流
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng |
网络摄像头
没有红外传感器或实体摄像头滑块。相反,摄像头可以通过热键以电子方式关闭。

可持续性
微星没有为 GF63 系列宣传任何可持续发展措施。不过,包装主要采用纸张和纸板。
配件和保修
包装盒内无任何额外物品。制造商提供标准的一年有限保修服务。
输入设备
显示屏
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 248.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1381:1 (Black: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.85 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 2.52
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
40.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
MSI Thin GF63 12VE AU Optronics B156HAN08.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | MSI GF63 Thin 9SC AU Optronics B156HAN02.1 (AUO21ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 BOE NJ NE156FHM-NX9, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng BOE094D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S LG LP156WFJ-SPB4 (LGD0742), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Asus TUF A15 FA507 N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -4% | 79% | -0% | 2% | 65% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.2 | 37.76 -4% | 73.7 88% | 39.2 0% | 40 2% | 64.9 66% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.4 | 56.5 -3% | 99.1 70% | 57.9 -1% | 60 3% | 96.5 65% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.5 | 39.01 -4% | 72.6 79% | 40.5 0% | 41.4 2% | 66.6 64% |
Response Times | -60% | -35% | 16% | -26% | -7% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 25.6 ? | 44.8 ? -75% | 42.2 ? -65% | 23.8 ? 7% | 34.2 ? -34% | 30.4 ? -19% |
Response Time Black / White * | 21.8 ? | 31.6 ? -45% | 22.6 ? -4% | 16.3 ? 25% | 25.8 ? -18% | 20.8 ? 5% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 4% | 27% | -12% | -14% | 34% | |
Brightness middle | 248.6 | 260 5% | 306 23% | 273 10% | 292 17% | 288 16% |
Brightness | 257 | 249 -3% | 287 12% | 249 -3% | 263 2% | 271 5% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 92 -4% | 88 -8% | 84 -12% | 80 -17% | 91 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.23 -28% | 0.21 -17% | 0.28 -56% | 0.25 -39% | 0.17 6% |
Contrast | 1381 | 1130 -18% | 1457 6% | 975 -29% | 1168 -15% | 1694 23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.85 | 4.1 30% | 2.25 62% | 5.19 11% | 7.15 -22% | 1.9 68% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.57 | 7.93 57% | 4.84 74% | 21.16 -14% | 15.51 16% | 3.3 82% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.52 | 3.56 -41% | 1.45 42% | 4.54 -80% | 4.13 -64% | 0.9 64% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 2.83 41% | 2.4 50% | 1.7 65% | 4.9 -2% | 2.7 44% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.53 87% | 2.259 97% | 2.148 102% | 2.014 109% | 2.32 95% |
CCT | 6271 104% | 6158 106% | 6790 96% | 6819 95% | 7178 91% | 6535 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -20% /
-7% | 24% /
29% | 1% /
-6% | -13% /
-12% | 31% /
35% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
21.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.2 ms rise | |
↘ 10.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.2 ms rise | |
↘ 13.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8527 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 MSI Center 设置为极致性能模式。
处理器
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr -2! | |
Gigabyte G5 KE -2! | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -4! | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 -2! |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (2952 - 4105, n=6) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (622 - 646, n=6) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (1150 - 1591, n=6) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (225 - 239, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (7081 - 9109, n=7) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (2155 - 2293, n=7) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (6777 - 8330, n=7) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (1527 - 1665, n=7) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (8.78 - 12.3, n=6) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (41.1 - 60.3, n=7) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (0.4949 - 0.54, n=7) | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (7229 - 10474, n=6) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (37583 - 51636, n=6) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (1724 - 2359, n=6) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (59539 - 68897, n=6) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (5007 - 6147, n=6) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (18516 - 25115, n=6) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (46835 - 78537, n=6) | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (490 - 708, n=6) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (4025 - 5614, n=6) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (12271 - 28682, n=6) | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6315 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (21750 - 43918, n=6) | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (22956 - 47555, n=6) | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (22297 - 46963, n=6) | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-12450H (76.5 - 100.9, n=6) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
* ... smaller is better
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC -8! |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
与其他配备相同 RTX 4050 GPU 的笔记本电脑相比,图形性能低于平均水平。 相同的 RTX 4050 GPU主要是因为我们的 8GB 系统内存有限。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV -1! | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 -1! | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 -1! | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -1! | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S -1! | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 -1! | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr |
3DMark 11 Performance | 20345 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15773 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6486 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (109.3 - 250, n=4) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (104.5 - 183.3, n=7) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (93.4 - 149.2, n=7) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (63.3 - 99.5, n=7) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (49.8 - 77.3, n=7) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE |
F1 22 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (175.1 - 364, n=16) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (100.9 - 244, n=22) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (101.8 - 234, n=21) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (94.4 - 174.7, n=22) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (10.9 - 56.4, n=24) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | |
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (83.1 - 122, n=5) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (67.2 - 103.1, n=8) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (50.1 - 88.6, n=9) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (42.4 - 75, n=9) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (35.8 - 67.3, n=9) | |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 150.9 | 142.2 | 110.7 | 67.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 122.7 | 108.6 | 95.9 | 90.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 123.2 | 85.7 | 64.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 70.1 | 63.8 | 55.5 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 97 | 84 | 82 | 70 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 299 | 160.9 | 129.5 | 113.6 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 113 | 95.6 | 72.1 | 55 |
F1 22 (2022) | 129.2 | 126.3 | 99.3 | 40.1 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 82.1 | 71.3 | 64 | 63.8 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 76.4 | 65.1 | 55.7 | 47.3 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.3 / 24.3 / 24.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36.2 / 59.3 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-12450H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM | MSI GF63 Thin 9SC GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i5-9300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13450HX, Micron 2400 MTFDKCD1T0QFM | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13420H, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -27% | -17% | -11% | -12% | 10% | |
off / environment * | 24.3 | 30 -23% | 25 -3% | 25 -3% | 25 -3% | 23.3 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.3 | 35 -44% | 26 -7% | 29 -19% | 25 -3% | 23.3 4% |
Idle Average * | 24.3 | 36 -48% | 34 -40% | 30 -23% | 29 -19% | 23.3 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.3 | 37 -52% | 36 -48% | 31 -28% | 30 -23% | 23.3 4% |
Load Average * | 36.2 | 44 -22% | 48 -33% | 40 -10% | 49 -35% | 29.6 18% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 47.7 | 48 -1% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 59.3 | 43 27% | 50 16% | 48 19% | 51 14% | 43 27% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41 | 42 | 49 | 43 |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.6 °C / 76.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+4.3 °C / 7.7 F).
MSI Thin GF63 12VE Intel Core i5-12450H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 2% | -17% | 11% | 0% | 1% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.8 | 47 -18% | 47 -18% | 42 -6% | 46 -16% | 48.9 -23% |
Maximum Bottom * | 37.6 | 47 -25% | 58 -54% | 42 -12% | 48 -28% | 44.6 -19% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32.8 | 26 21% | 32 2% | 24 27% | 27 18% | 27.1 17% |
Idle Bottom * | 37.6 | 26 31% | 36 4% | 24 36% | 28 26% | 27.5 27% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 46 | 45 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.9 | -- | 88 | 54 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 3.2 | 1440 | 86 | 70 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力(平衡模式) | 2.4 | 1740 | 72 | 68 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力(性能模式) | 2.4 | 1755 | 79 | 64 |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
MSI Thin GF63 12VE i5-12450H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GF63 Thin 9SC i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKCD1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -18% | -83% | -20% | -8% | -32% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.3 | 7 -63% | 13 -202% | 5 -16% | 7 -63% | 8 -86% |
Idle Average * | 9.2 | 9 2% | 18 -96% | 9 2% | 8 13% | 12.1 -32% |
Idle Maximum * | 16.4 | 13 21% | 24 -46% | 22 -34% | 11 33% | 12.5 24% |
Load Average * | 67 | 79 -18% | 85 -27% | 72 -7% | 76 -13% | 74.9 -12% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 94.2 | 150.9 -60% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 98.2 | 155.7 -59% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 122 | 164 -34% | 232 -90% | 176 -44% | 136 -11% | 185 -52% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 73 | 113 | 98.2 | 136.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
MSI Thin GF63 12VE i5-12450H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 52.4 Wh | MSI GF63 Thin 9SC i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 51 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 60 Wh | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 57 Wh | Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 23% | 50% | 110% | 163% | 229% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 213 | 262 23% | 320 50% | 448 110% | 561 163% | 701 229% |
Reader / Idle | 507 | 1290 | ||||
Load | 72 | 100 | 59 | |||
H.264 | 747 |
笔记本检查评级
MSI Thin GF63 12VE
- 04/03/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSI Thin GF63 12VE Intel Core i5-12450H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $863.00 List Price: 900 USD | 1.8 kg | 21.7 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $585.00 MSI GF63 Thin 9SC-068 15.6" ... 2. $899.99 MSI GF63 Thin 9SC-066 15.6" ... 3. $28.49 TREE.NB BTY-M6K Laptop Batte... List Price: 975 EUR | 1.8 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 Intel Core i5-13450HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,269.00 List Price: 1149 Euro | 2.4 kg | 23.9 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng Intel Core i5-13500H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $126.00 15.6" FHD 1920(RGB)*1080 LCD... 2. $125.99 15.6" FHD 1920(RGB)*1080 144... 3. $12.00 RAKSTORE Laptop CPU Cooling ... List Price: 1000 EUR | 2.3 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $22.99 Deal4GO CPU & GPU Graphics C... List Price: 900 EUR | 2.1 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $36.98 90Wh C41N2013 C41N2013-1 Lap... 2. $36.99 Replacement Backlit Keyboard... 3. $729.00 ASUS TUF Gaming A15 Laptop |... List Price: 1199€ | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.