微星 Katana A17 AI 笔记本电脑评测：图形处理能力强劲，但显示效果不佳
基本的 1080p 显示屏还有很多不足之处。
Katana A17 是 GE、GS 或 GT 系列的廉价替代品，其 105 WGeForce RTX 4070 GPU 仍能提供出色的图形性能。遗憾的是，它的 1080p 面板缺乏完整的 sRGB 色彩、快速响应时间和 G-Sync 支持。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
结论 - 如果能避免选择更便宜的显示屏，则非常适合玩游戏
作为微星更经济实惠的游戏笔记本电脑之一，Katana A17 减少了花哨的 LED 和金属材料，采用了更基本的塑料设计，同时保留了高原生刷新率和 GPU（如GeForce RTX 4070）选项。对于预算紧张的核心游戏玩家来说，GPU 可能比其他方面更重要，而 Katana A17 在这一方面做到了这一点，同时还为非游戏任务提供了合适的风扇噪音水平和舒适的键盘。
不过，该机的缺点也不少。最明显的是，电池续航时间短，1080p144 显示屏的色彩和亮度较差，观看体验不佳。1440p240 选项直接解决了这一问题，但在 Ryzen 7 配置中却无法使用，因为它与 Ryzen 9 CPU 绑定，这意味着用户需要额外支付 400 美元才能获得更好的屏幕。如果考虑到Ryzen 9 8945HS与Ryzen 7 8845HS相比几乎没有任何优势，那么QHD配置的价格就显得过高了，尤其是当更高端的 微星 GS 系列可以找到差不多相同价格的产品。
Pros
+ 每瓦性能优于英特尔版本
+ 性价比极高的图形性能
+ 无 CPU 或 GPU 节流问题
+ 良好的散热性能
+ 维修相对容易
Cons
- 不支持 G-Sync 或高级 Optimus
- 易沾染指纹的塑料机箱
- 1440p 升级价格昂贵
- 低质量 1080p 面板
- 电池寿命短
$1,099.00
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VF 2024 Gaming Laptop 15.6" FHD IPS 144Hz 8-Core AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 32GB DDR5 1TB SSD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB GDDR6 Wi-Fi 6E RGB Backlit Keyboard Win11 Pro w/ONT 32GB USB
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 78.6%  | MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,099.00 List Price: 1400 USD | 2.7 kg | 25.2 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
2. 80.4%  | HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,699.00 HP Omen 17 Gaming Laptop 17.... 2. $1,449.99 HP OMEN 16 Gaming Laptop (16... 3. $25.89 ANGWEL New PA06 Laptop Batte... List Price: 1900€ | 2.8 kg | 30.1 mm | 17.30" 2560x1440 170 PPI IPS |
3. 85.6% v7 (old)  | Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,983.68 List Price: 1400 USD | 2.5 kg | 25.4 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
4. 87.2% v7 (old)  | Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $96.99 LCDOLED Compatible with Acer... 2. $15.98 Deal4GO CPU Cooling Fan 23.Q... 3. $190.00 17.3" QHD 2560(RGB)*1440 for... List Price: 1900€ | 3 kg | 30.3 mm | 17.30" 2560x1440 170 PPI |
5. 86.3% v7 (old)  | MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK Intel Core i7-13700H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $49.99 230W 240W AC Charger for MSI... 2. $2,598.00 MSI Pulse 17 Gaming Laptop: ... 3. $64.99 240W 20V 12A AC Adapter for ... List Price: 2500€ | 2.7 kg | 27.2 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
6. 85.2% v7 (old)  | Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $84.93 SCREENARAMA New Screen Repla... 2. $35.99 230W AC Adapter Charger for ... 3. $60.99 300W Legion Charger fit for ... List Price: 1810 EUR | 3.1 kg | 24.3 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
面向预算的 Katana A17 是去年采用英特尔处理器的 Katana 17 的 AMD 新版本。为了控制价格，它使用了 Zen 4 系列的 CPU，而不是最新的 Zen 5。
我们的测试机为中端配置，配备 Ryzen 7 8845HS CPU、GeForce RTX 4070 GPU 和 17.3 英寸 1080p144 显示屏，售价约为 1400 美元。较低端的 SKU 可能配备 RTX 4060 或 4050，而高端的 SKU 则配备 Ryzen 9 8945HS 和 1440p240 Hz 显示屏。该机型的 15 英寸版本名为Katana A15 。
卡塔娜 A17 的替代品包括其他面向预算的游戏笔记本电脑，如华硕 TUF Gaming A17 宏碁 Nitro 17 或联想Legion 5 。
更多微星评论：
规格
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 20 W PL2 / Short Burst, 20 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1605 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 105 W TDP, GDDR6, 566.36, MUX
Memory
32 GB
, Micron, DDR5-5600, 46-45-45-90, Dual-Channel
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW, 1024 GB
Weight
2.691 kg, Power Supply: 694 g
Price
1400 USD
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
外壳 - 塑料材质
底盘与 2023 年的 Katana 17 型号相比没有变化，因此它采用了与以前相同的 ABS 塑料骨架、键盘和连接选项。相比之下，GT 或 GS 系列的高端机型采用了更多金属合金，外观更加奢华。当然，Katana A17 未来的铰链可能会更加坚固。
连接性
交流
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1106 (1074-1152)
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1482 (1464-1512)
网络摄像头
该机型集成了一个低质量的 720p 或 100 万像素网络摄像头，没有隐私快门或红外功能。摄像头可通过热键以电子方式禁用。
11.1 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
13 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
维护
底板由 13 颗十字螺丝固定，维修相对方便。需要注意的是，要进入主板，必须先撕下防破坏贴纸。进入主板后，用户将看到 2x M.2 2280 插槽、2x SODIMM 插槽和可拆卸的 WLAN 模块。
可持续性
微星没有为 Katana A17 系列宣传可持续发展的主张。除此之外，包装大部分是纸板，外加一些塑料保护膜。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了 200 瓦交流适配器和文件外，没有其他附件。制造商通常提供一年有限保修。
显示屏--刷新率尚可，但色彩不佳
不要被 144 Hz 的快速刷新率所迷惑，因为这款显示器在其他方面并不出众。亮度、响应时间和色彩覆盖范围分别较暗、一般和窄，只能代表预算面板的水平。甚至主观感觉色彩和重影都明显不如联想Legion 5 17 或微星 GT 系列等更昂贵机型的流畅显示效果。 微星 GT 系列.至少，图像质量是干净的，没有严重的背光渗色或颗粒感问题。
请注意，这块完全相同的 AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 面板也出现在竞争产品上。 华硕 TUF GAMING A17.价格更高的 1440p240Hz 配置有望提供更好的色彩和功能。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 253.7 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 234.1 cd/m² Minimum: 11.67 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 244.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 1111:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9, calibrated: 2.36
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
41.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 144 Hz | HP Omen 17-db0079ng BOE0B67, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3", 240 Hz | Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 144 Hz | Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER BOE0B7C NE173QHM-NY6, , 2560x1440, 17.3", 165 Hz | MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 144 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE LEN173FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 144 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 64% | 0% | 108% | -3% | 63% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.8 | 66.2 66% | 39.7 0% | 98.3 147% | 38.4 -4% | 64.8 63% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.3 | 95.5 61% | 59.1 0% | 100 69% | 57.5 -3% | 97.2 64% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.1 | 68.1 66% | 41 0% | 85.7 109% | 39.7 -3% | 66.7 62% |
| Response Times | 60% | -18% | 60% | 2% | 57% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30.8 ? | 14.4 ? 53% | 39 ? -27% | 14.8 ? 52% | 31.2 ? -1% | 15 ? 51% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24.6 ? | 8.3 ? 66% | 26.9 ? -9% | 8 ? 67% | 23.6 ? 4% | 9 ? 63% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | 25% | 4% | -14% | 11% | 29% | |
| Brightness middle | 244.5 | 363 48% | 255.9 5% | 361 48% | 254 4% | 323 32% |
| Brightness | 234 | 341 46% | 248 6% | 326 39% | 250 7% | 305 30% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 84 1% | 91 10% | 87 5% | 91 10% | 89 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.38 -73% | 0.21 5% | 0.6 -173% | 0.14 36% | 0.25 -14% |
| Contrast | 1111 | 955 -14% | 1219 10% | 602 -46% | 1814 63% | 1292 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 1.74 63% | 4.51 4% | 3.83 19% | 4.52 4% | 1.87 60% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 22.5 | 5.39 76% | 20.77 8% | 5.71 75% | 21.22 6% | 4.84 78% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.36 | 1.43 39% | 1.82 23% | 3.48 -47% | 4.52 -92% | 0.92 61% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.3 43% | 3.2 -39% | 3.29 -43% | 1 57% | 2.57 -12% |
| Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.235 98% | 2.08 106% | 2.29 96% | 2.44 90% | 2.42 91% |
| CCT | 6597 99% | 6346 102% | 6054 107% | 6679 97% | 6502 100% | 7012 93% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 50% /
39% | -5% /
-0% | 51% /
23% | 3% /
6% | 50% /
40% |
* ... smaller is better
开箱即用的灰度效果不错，而色彩准确度还有待提高。自行校准面板可将平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别从 2.3 和 4.7 提高到 1.8 和 2.36。我们的校准 ICM 配置文件可在上面免费下载。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8631 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - AMD Zen 4 带来更高的每瓦性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 Windows 和 MSI Center 设置为性能模式。我们还将系统设置为独立 GPU 模式，而不是 MSHybrid。用户应该熟悉微星中心，因为许多关键设置都在这里切换。
处理器
......（英文 Ryzen 7 8845HS与 酷睿 i7-12700H两者都能很好地搭配移动 RTX 4070。升级到 Ryzen 9 8945HS根据我们使用 Katana A15 的情况，预计升级到 Ryzen 9 8945HS 只会带来 5% 的微弱提升。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2565 (2541.46-2581.14)
HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2557 (2454.44-2575)
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2784 (2741.98-2817.3)
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2728 (2664.71-2893.73)
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2796 (2748.57-2868.62)
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H: Ø1697 (1651.6-1708.01)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H: Ø2295 (2246.31-2349.07)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=16) | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2510 - 2698, n=14) | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (23708 - 29544, n=12) | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (99659 - 125873, n=12) | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4332 - 5180, n=12) | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (109458 - 124695, n=12) | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14062 - 15519, n=12) | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (53436 - 67367, n=12) | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64515 - 172642, n=12) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (12361 - 15911, n=12) | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (33192 - 41668, n=12) | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力时，CPU 的时钟频率和封装功耗分别为 2.0 GHz 和 20 W。在运行游戏等苛刻负载时，CPU 和 GPU 的温度也相对游戏笔记本电脑较低，分别仅为 65 摄氏度。相比之下，Maingear ML-16 的 CPU 和 GPU ML-16在类似条件下，CPU 和 GPU 的温度会分别稳定在约 100 摄氏度和 85 摄氏度。
请注意，正如下面的截图所示，Cooler Boost 模式（即最大风扇模式）对游戏性能没有重大影响。不过，降至平衡模式后，GPU 时钟速率的上限会降低。这些结果与我们在其他微星游戏笔记本电脑上观察到的结果一致。
如果从 "性能 "模式切换到 "平衡 "模式，GPU 功耗将从 100 W 下降到 65 W。
| 平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 34 | 37 |
| Prime95 压力 | 2.0 | -- | 57 | 55 |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.8 | 2190 | 64 | 75 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力（平衡配置文件） | 1.2 | 1800 | 63 | 66 |
| 赛博朋克 2077 压力（冷却器启动关闭） | 1.5 | 2370 | 65 | 74 |
| 赛博朋克 2077 压力（冷却器启动） | 1.5 | 2340 | 56 | 66 |
系统性能
PCMark 分数高于旧版 Katana 17，尤其是在数字内容创建子测试中，这是因为我们的 GPU 速度更快。另一方面，我们的处理器密集型 "生产力 "子测试得分仅略高于前者。这些结果与我们在 CPU 和 GPU 基准测试中观察到的结果一致。这次的内存性能也更高。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7800 - 8070, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10499 - 10664, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9887 - 10202, n=2) | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12023 - 13528, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1531 - 1790, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1488 - 1720, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1683 - 1932, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1255 - 1603, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (275 - 312, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU () | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (500 - 564, n=2) | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8070 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (61459 - 71873, n=12) | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (68425 - 93239, n=12) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (82.5 - 117, n=12) | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 显示，在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签页时存在 DPC 延迟问题。此外，即使设置为 iGPU 模式，4K60 视频播放也不完美，在 60 秒的时间跨度内记录到 4 个丢帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
三星 三星 PM9C1是一款中端 PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘，传输速率高达 5000 MB/s。遗憾的是，这一最高传输速率只能维持一分钟左右，然后就会稳步下降到 3000 MB/s 的低速范围。
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
5060 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
3579 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
639.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
405.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3686 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3571 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
76.17 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
248.7 MB/s
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER -1! | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
| HP Omen 17-db0079ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3522 (2846.85-4469.32)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4543 (2707.25-4716.49)
图形处理器性能 - 105 WGeForce RTX 4070
图形性能比我们数据库中配备相同 GeForce RTX 4070图形处理器，这对于像卡塔纳 A17 这样以预算为导向的机型来说是件好事。不过，请记住，移动 RTX 4070 的 VRAM 要比桌面 RTX 4070 少得多。 桌面版 RTX 4070这可能会影响较高纹理设置或分辨率下的性能。
| 电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 32669 | 27799 | 14107 |
| 均衡模式 | 27310 (-16%) | 28029 (-1%) | 11927 (-15%) |
| 电池电量 | 16481 (-50%) | 20600 (-26%) | 4877 (-65%) |
如Fire Strike 上表所示，在平衡模式下运行对图形性能的影响略高于 15%，而在电池供电模式下运行时，差距会更大。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 35828 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 63840 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 28215 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 12020 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2641 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
使用内置的 1080p 或 1440p 显示屏，在高至最高设置下，移动 RTX 4070 足以满足游戏需求。如果想要达到稳定的 144 FPS，以充分利用 1080p 面板的 144 Hz 刷新率，建议启用 DLSS。奇怪的是，即使重新安装并多次尝试，Strange Brigade 也无法启动。
Baldur's Gate 3 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | GTA V | Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | X-Plane 11.11 | Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | Dota 2 Reborn | Far Cry 5 | F1 22
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
| Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (119.8 - 175.5, n=17) | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
| Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (43.1 - 156.6, n=27) | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
| Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (81.6 - 124.5, n=29) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
| Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (74.7 - 103.6, n=30) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (30.7 - 90.7, n=37) | |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
| 1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (277 - 345, n=4) | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (98.1 - 283, n=14) | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (92.5 - 231, n=14) | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (74.3 - 151.4, n=14) | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
| 1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (58.6 - 115.9, n=17) | |
| MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø81.4 (76.2-82.5)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 184 | 179.8 | 171.1 | 120 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 168.4 | 154 | 149.1 | 143.1 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 218 | 162.2 | 120.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 88.9 | 82 | 66.2 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 158 | 139 | 133 | 124 |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 245.9 | 199.6 | 138.7 | 107.7 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 256 | 252 | 216 | 81.9 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 162.6 | 139.3 | 122.4 | 121.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 135.1 | 119.1 | 101 | 85.5 |
排放量
系统噪音
风扇噪音总体上比我们在旧版 Katana 17 上记录到的噪音要小。更具体地说，我们的 Katana A17 在达到与以前类似的噪音水平之前，能保持更长时间的安静。
需要注意的是，在关闭 Cooler Boost 而不是开启的情况下，游戏噪音水平会有明显差异（51 dB(A) 对 60 dB(A)），尽管两者的性能差异极小。因此，建议在大多数情况下关闭 Cooler Boost 功能。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.9 / 24.1 / 24.2 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 24 / 59.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.5 dB(A) | ||
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW | HP Omen 17-db0079ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -19% | -21% | -13% | -2% | -14% | |
| off / environment * | 23.5 | 25 -6% | 27.9 -19% | 24 -2% | 24 -2% | 25 -6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.9 | 25 -5% | 28.5 -19% | 24 -0% | 24 -0% | 25 -5% |
| Idle Average * | 24.1 | 29 -20% | 29.8 -24% | 24 -0% | 24 -0% | 25 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.2 | 33 -36% | 29.8 -23% | 32.32 -34% | 24 1% | 30.5 -26% |
| Load Average * | 24 | 45 -88% | 34.8 -45% | 35.18 -47% | 32.49 -35% | 37.5 -56% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 51.2 | 48 6% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 59.8 | 52 13% | 57.3 4% | 54.78 8% | 46.51 22% | 51 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 57.1 | 54.78 | 46.51 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
键盘中心的表面温度最高，游戏时手掌和手指与键盘中心的接触最小。结果与 华硕 TUF Gaming A17类似。
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22.4 °C / 72.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+6.5 °C / 11.7 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22.4 °C / 72.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+6.5 °C / 11.7 F).
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 17-db0079ng AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 9% | 20% | -6% | -3% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 44 -5% | 40 5% | 46 -10% | 48 -14% | 42.2 -0% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 41.4 | 45 -9% | 33.6 19% | 51 -23% | 50 -21% | 50.9 -23% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32.6 | 26 20% | 26.6 18% | 34 -4% | 30 8% | 34.3 -5% |
| Idle Bottom * | 38.2 | 27 29% | 24.4 36% | 33 14% | 33 14% | 32 16% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 每瓦性能卓越，但电池寿命较短
耗电量
总体消耗量非常接近我们在两岁的 卡塔纳 17尽管我们的 Katana A17 的 CPU 性能大致相同，但图形性能却提高了 20%。因此，Ryzen 7 7 8845HS 与 Core i7-13620H 相比，每瓦性能更高。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.08 / 0.24 Watt |
| Idle | 15.4 / 16.8 / 17.1 Watt |
| Load |
59.3 / 160 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, , 2560x1440, 17.3" | MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -6% | -11% | -3% | 12% | -38% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 15.4 | 6 61% | 6.2 60% | 8.3 46% | 9 42% | 15.6 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 16.8 | 12 29% | 21.8 -30% | 13.5 20% | 10.2 39% | 20.7 -23% |
| Idle Maximum * | 17.1 | 18 -5% | 22 -29% | 14.8 13% | 10.8 37% | 22.9 -34% |
| Load Average * | 59.3 | 71 -20% | 59.2 -0% | 77 -30% | 72 -21% | 134 -126% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 147.4 | 191.8 -30% | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 150.6 | 197 -31% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 160 | 228 -43% | 247.8 -55% | 263 -64% | 221 -38% | 170 -6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 189.7 | 154 | 130 | 135 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø153.9 (118.3-159.5)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø166.9 (139.5-213)
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø16.4 (12.5-21.7)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.6 (5.51-24.4)
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø150.6 (147.4-154.1)
Power Consumption external Monitor
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø42.5 (39.4-46.3)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø125.9 (117.7-155.7)
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø39 (35.9-42)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø124.9 (119.6-131.1)
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø139.8 (134.9-145.5)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø137.7 (133.7-144)
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø15.9 (12.4-28.5)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø21.2 (12-34.6)
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø147.4 (144.2-150.7)
电池寿命
电池容量较小，仅为 53 瓦时，即使设置为 iGPU 模式，运行时间也普遍短于大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑。
| MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh | HP Omen 17-db0079ng R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 131% | 132% | 109% | 128% | 11% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 236 | 544 131% | 548 132% | 494 109% | 537 128% | 263 11% |
| H.264 | 462 | 413 | 212 | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 59 | |||||
| Reader / Idle | 1180 | 331 | ||||
| Load | 103 | 131 | 111 | |||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 151 |
笔记本检查评级
MSI Katana A17 AI B8VG
- 02/03/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
