宏碁 Nitro V 16 ANV16-41 评测：一款经济实惠的游戏笔记本电脑
需要硝基吗？
Nitro V16 是一款售价在 1000 美元左右的游戏笔记本电脑，在同价位（Ryzen 8000 和 RTX 4060）的笔记本电脑中，它的性能相当不错。在这里，我们将了解这款 16 英寸设备在所有其他类别中的表现是否同样出色。先说第一件事：遗憾的是，宏碁在一个重要方面失败了。Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论 - 宏碁忽视了图像质量
一台笔记本电脑是否值得我们推荐，往往取决于一点。从纸面上看，Nitro V 16 ANV16-41 给人的印象非常成功。AMD 的 8000 代 Ryzen 处理器以其良好的功耗速度比著称。我们的测试配置中安装的来自 Nvidia 的GeForce RTX 4060 情况也类似。16GB DDR5 内存和 1TB SSD 也（仍然）适合刚刚超过 1000 美元的价格段。
它的 IPS 屏幕采用目前流行的 16:10 长宽比，刷新率为 165 Hz，分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 像素。然而，你第一眼并没有意识到，宏碁选择了一款相当低劣的显示屏，我们稍后会详细说明。总之，它的色彩空间覆盖率尤其不足，使内容显得相当苍白无力。在其他方面，无论是输入设备、扬声器、网络摄像头还是电池容量，它也只能达到一般水平。与此同时，它在升级和维护选项方面却获得了加分：内存（两个内存库）和大容量存储器（两个 M.2 插槽）都可以在必要时轻松更换或扩展。
总的来说，如果看看 Nitro V 16 的一些竞争对手，我们还是很难推荐它。价格相近或略高的游戏笔记本电脑，显示效果明显更好，比如联想Legion 5 16IRX G9，它配备了酷睿 i7-14650HX 和 RTX 4060。我们还列出了惠普 Victus 16、努比亚 RedMagic Titan 16 和华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16（均为 16 英寸机型），作为测试的进一步对手。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 76.3%  | Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1100 EUR | 2.5 kg | 25.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
2. 89.1% v7 (old)  | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1599€ | 2.4 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
3. 84.3% v7 (old)  | HP Victus 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,549.00 List Price: 1499 Euro | 2.4 kg | 23.9 mm | 16.10" 1920x1080 137 PPI IPS |
4. 81.2%  | Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $62.99 atFoliX Screen Protector com... 2. $62.19 atFoliX Screen Protection Fi... 3. $59.69 atFoliX Plastic Glass Protec... List Price: 1759 Euro | 2.4 kg | 23.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
5. 85.9%  | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,199.00 List Price: 2599€ | 1.8 kg | 17.2 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
Table of Contents
Nitro V 16 有多种型号可供选择。根据配置的不同，它配备了 Ryzen 5 8645HS或 Ryzen 7 8845HS内核。内存容量从 16 GB 到 32 GB 不等，NVMe 固态硬盘容量均为 1 TB。无论是 GeForce RTX 4050或 RTX 4060负责图像处理。这些型号的售价在 1000 美元到 1400 美元之间。
规格
案例
Acer Nitro V 16 的外壳完全由塑料制成，乍一看很整洁，但仔细观察却感觉质量不高，而且容易发出嘎嘎的响声。不过，就其制造质量而言，我们没有什么可抱怨的，它的质量无可挑剔。它的铰链做得还不错，单手就能轻松打开屏幕（最大角度约为 145°）。遗憾的是，笔记本电脑的表面很容易收集到明显的指纹，这与它的深色机身不无关系。
Nitro V 16 的重量为 2.5 千克，是同类产品中最重的 16 英寸机型，尽管大多数竞争对手的重量都略轻一些。只有 Zephyrus G16才以 1.8 千克的重量脱颖而出。在机身高度方面，情况几乎相同。宏碁设备的高度为 2.55 厘米，再次与竞争对手保持一致，只有华硕笔记本电脑低于 2 厘米大关。
尺寸比较
连接性
端口
如果不考虑缺失的读卡器，这款笔记本电脑的端口选择还是相当不错的。虽然我们希望再增加一个 USB-C 端口，但现有的 USB 端口是第 4 版型号（包括 DisplayPort）。而两个 USB-A 端口则使用 3.2 Gen 2 标准。此外，还有一个 HDMI 2.1 端口、一个千兆 LAN 端口、一个音频插孔和一个 Kensington 锁开口。宏碁将部分端口放在了设备的背面，这在使用外置鼠标时非常有利（关键词：空间）。
交流
在距离参考路由器一米远的距离测试中，安装的联发科芯片（RZ616）提供了稳定（发射）到非常好（接收）的性能。
网络摄像头
买家只能期待它的网络摄像头是劣质的标准产品。90 万像素的摄像头既不清晰，色彩也不真实（见图片）。
配件
宏碁随笔记本电脑附送了几份信息宣传单和一个半紧凑型 135 瓦电源。
维护
底板由 11 颗十字螺丝固定。正如开头提到的，笔记本电脑的引擎盖下有两个 M.2 插槽（其中一个是空的）和两个内存组，不过这些都隐藏在一个盖子后面。此外，还可以看到电池、无线局域网模块和冷却系统。
可持续性
制造商主要使用硬纸板进行设备包装。只有电源装置和笔记本电脑本身用塑料薄膜或套管包裹。
保修
该笔记本电脑在美国享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。
输入设备
键盘
与 Nitro V 15与 Nitro V 15 类似，我们认为该机型的键盘也很一般。它有些松软的键入感可能只能在一定程度上满足经常打字者的需求。宏碁（Acer）选择了橙色灯光和字母作为点缀。从某些角度看，后者不是特别容易看清。它的布局既有优点，也有缺点。在积极的一面，我们不得不提到大小适中的方向箭头。另一方面，我们对电源按钮不太满意，因为它没有与其他按键分开。
触摸板
触摸板的质量与键盘大致相同，这意味着它虽然可用，但并非真正的亮点。宏碁可以在精确度和滑动性能上下功夫。点击区域听起来也很不稳定，即廉价。不过，它 12.6 x 8.2 厘米的尺寸还是无可挑剔的。
显示屏
这就引出了 Nitro V 16 最大的弱点，即其苍白的显示屏。57% 的 sRGB 覆盖率、40% 的 AdobeRGB 覆盖率和 38% 的 DCI-P3 覆盖率是一个相当糟糕的结果，在 2024 年确实应该成为过去。在对比设备中，显示效果如此差的只有 惠普 Victus 16.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 303 cd/m²
Contrast: 947:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.78
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
39.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.372
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT AUO B160UAN05.B (AUOD8B1), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 165 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NE160QDM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | HP Victus 16 (2024) Chi Mei CMN163E, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1", 144 Hz | Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 83% | 8% | 112% | 127% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.3 | 72.4 89% | 41.3 8% | 96.3 151% | 99.9 161% |
| sRGB Coverage | 57.4 | 100 74% | 61.7 7% | 100 74% | 100 74% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.6 | 74.1 87% | 42.7 8% | 84.1 112% | 96.9 145% |
| Response Times | 55% | -2% | 80% | 99% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26.5 ? | 12.5 ? 53% | 28.6 ? -8% | 3.9 ? 85% | 0.22 ? 99% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 19.6 ? | 8.7 ? 56% | 18.7 ? 5% | 5 ? 74% | 0.25 ? 99% |
| PWM Frequency | 960 | ||||
| Screen | 56% | 9% | 31% | 45% | |
| Brightness middle | 303 | 526 74% | 287 -5% | 543 79% | 416 37% |
| Brightness | 305 | 500 64% | 288 -6% | 516 69% | 418 37% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 87 -6% | 86 -8% | 86 -8% | 96 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.33 -3% | 0.19 41% | 0.51 -59% | |
| Contrast | 947 | 1594 68% | 1511 60% | 1065 12% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.74 | 1.2 79% | 5.46 5% | 3.19 44% | 1.6 72% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 22.69 | 2.1 91% | 20.36 10% | 7.09 69% | 2.1 91% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.78 | 1 74% | 3.52 7% | 0.69 82% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 1.3 67% | 4.8 -20% | 4.2 -5% | 2.7 32% |
| Gamma | 2.372 93% | 2.23 99% | 2.108 104% | 1.999 110% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 7461 87% | 6391 102% | 6442 101% | 7431 87% | 6331 103% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 65% /
62% | 5% /
7% | 74% /
56% | 90% /
77% |
* ... smaller is better
它的响应时间也只能在一定程度上满足多媒体和游戏的要求，从黑到白约为 20 毫秒，从灰到灰约为 27 毫秒。大多数竞争对手在这方面的表现都更好。
室外风扇也很难物有所值。平均 303 cd/m² 的亮度只适合室内使用。
按照 IPS 标准，它的黑度（0.32 cd/m²）和对比度（947:1）还算可以，但 Nitro V 16 无法与 OLED 面板相比。屏幕的视角稳定性也差不多。另一方面，16 英寸面板在所有亮度下都不会出现画面闪烁的现象。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 26.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
无论安装的 GPU（RTX 4050 或 RTX 4060）如何，Nitro V 16 都处于游戏笔记本电脑的中端位置。一般来说，Ryzen 处理器（8645HS 或 8845HS）在未来几年应该有足够的储备。
测试条件
您可以使用一个特殊的按钮（或在 NitroSense 软件中）在不同的配置文件之间进行切换。这些模式从Eco到Turbo 不等，但根据我们的测量，它们在性能和噪音排放方面差别很小。我们使用性能模式进行测试。只有笔记本的电池寿命是使用平衡模式测量的。
| 赛博朋克 2077》循环序列 (FHD/Ultra) | 安静 | 平衡 | 性能 | 涡轮增压 |
| 噪音 | 52 dB(A) | 53 dB(A) | 54 dB(A) | 55 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 59 fps | 63 fps | 64 fps | 68 fps |
| CPU PL1 (HWiNFO) | 45 瓦 | 45 瓦 | 54 瓦 | 54 瓦 |
| CPU PL2 (HWiNFO) | 65 瓦 | 65 瓦 | 65 瓦 | 65 瓦 |
处理器
Ryzen 7 8845HS 是 Zen 4 代的八核心型号，可通过 SMT 处理多达 16 个并行线程，并配备了相当快的 iGPU，即 Radeon 780M.在基准测试和 Cinebench 循环测试中，这款 4 纳米芯片的性能与 英特尔酷睿 i7-14700HX.但是，8845HS 无法与较新的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
在系统性能方面，Nitro V 16 排在倒数第二位，仅次于惠普 Victus 16，不过与其他对比设备的差距并不大。主观而言，这款笔记本电脑运行良好，反应迅速。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (7538 - 8822, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=164, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9936 - 10061, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9789 - 14612, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=164, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (11953 - 12674, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=164, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (305 - 305, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=149, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (176.4 - 264, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (496 - 523, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=175, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7538 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (61459 - 71873, n=11) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=11) | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (68425 - 93239, n=11) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (82.5 - 117, n=11) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
延迟并不是 16 英寸设备的强项。LatencyMon 工具证实，V 16 在实时音频处理和其他方面可能存在问题。只有 Zephyrus G16 在对比领域表现出色。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
宏碁采用的是固态 NVMe SSD，即 Micron 2550。它在读取或写入时既不慢也不特别快。在使用 DiskSpd 进行的长期测试中，我们发现固态硬盘的性能在长期运行中略有下降，但在其他设备上（例如，联想的 DiskSpd），固态硬盘的性能波动明显更大或下降更多。 联想Legion 5和惠普 Victus 16）。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 29566 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 166948 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 64085 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23112 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9511 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在日常游戏过程中，Nitro 往往会出现问题，至少与同类产品相比是如此。我们测得其他 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑的速度有时要快 20% 以上。原则上，RTX 4060 的性能足以在最大设置下以屏幕原始分辨率流畅运行几乎所有现代游戏。只有在玩要求极高和/或优化不佳的游戏时，如 星球大战外传等要求极高和/或优化较差的游戏时，才需要降低细节或使用 DLSS。
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (56.4 - 93.1, n=30) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
| Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (76.9 - 126.3, n=47) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 175.8 | 167.8 | 104.6 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 161.6 | 156 | 138.3 | 130.5 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 205 | 130.8 | 96.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 87.1 | 87.7 | 60.7 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 251 | 200 | 169.7 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 98.3 | 83.1 | 80.9 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 90.6 | 77.2 | 66.4 | |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 345 | 340 | 337 | |
| Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 42.6 | 35.6 | 29.1 | |
| Space Marine 2 (2024) | 76.9 | 76 | 67.8 | |
| Final Fantasy XVI (2024) | 64 | 54.8 | 50.4 | |
| God of War Ragnarök (2024) | 102.8 | 88 | 80.2 | |
| Until Dawn (2024) | 80.1 | 56.8 | 43.2 | |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 116 | 80 | 76 | |
| Stalker 2 (2024) | 54.1 | 48.1 | 40.2 |
我们测试了 GPU 的性能是否在较长时间内保持稳定。 赛博朋克 2077.我们没有发现这方面的异常。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
排放量
噪音排放
除了显示屏，Nitro V 16 混乱的风扇控制也是其最大的弱点之一。即使在平衡模式下，风扇也会在出现打开浏览器等小事时不必要地加速。在实际使用中，来回跳转的速度会让人感到非常恼火，因此宏碁绝对应该在这方面做出改进。16 英寸设备在负载情况下一般声音都比较大。超过 50 分贝（A）时肯定需要使用耳机。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 28 / 37 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 51 / 52 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16 (2024) i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 3% | -10% | 6% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 24 4% | 25 -0% | 26 -4% | 24.6 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 24 4% | 28 -12% | 35 -40% | 28.6 -14% |
| Idle Average * | 28 | 28.8 -3% | 29 -4% | 36 -29% | 28.6 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 37 | 32 14% | 33 11% | 40 -8% | 28.6 23% |
| Load Average * | 51 | 45.5 11% | 45 12% | 49 4% | 42.8 16% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 54 | 50 7% | 48.3 11% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 52 | 55.7 -7% | 48 8% | 52 -0% | 48.3 7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.1 | 43 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
另一方面，在我们的测试过程中，其温度保持在可接受的范围内。虽然在负载情况下，机箱底部有时会升温至接近 50 °C，但顶部温度并不高，最高温度为 42 °C。在空闲模式下，情况（即顶部和底部的温度比）看起来差不多。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16 (2024) i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 6% | 7% | -6% | 3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41 | 40.4 1% | 50 -22% | 50 -22% | 48.2 -18% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 49 | 43.8 11% | 50 -2% | 58 -18% | 51.3 -5% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 30.3 5% | 25 22% | 31 3% | 28 12% |
| Idle Bottom * | 37 | 35.3 5% | 26 30% | 32 14% | 28.8 22% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
我们也不必担心笔记本的组件。无论是在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，还是在使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行压力测试时，CPU 和 GPU 的温度都稳定在 70 °C以下，完全没有问题。
发言人
2.0 系统的最大音量为 82 dB(A)，但正如我们从大多数笔记本电脑中了解到的那样，它在低音方面存在弱点。它的音质足以满足偶尔观看 YouTube 视频等的需求，但如果要享受更密集的媒体（电影、音乐、游戏......），则应尽可能连接外置扬声器或耳机。
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
耗电量
得益于 Ryzen CPU，Nitro V 16 是我们测试领域中最节俭的代表。空闲模式下的功耗为 9 至 13 瓦，负载模式下的功耗为 61 至 134 瓦，在某些情况下明显超过了英特尔的竞争对手。
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.8 Watt |
| Idle | 9 / 10 / 13 Watt |
| Load |
61 / 134 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16 (2024) i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -76% | -62% | -80% | -13% | -81% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 9 | 15.4 -71% | 9 -0% | 16 -78% | 6.9 23% | 13.5 ? -50% |
| Idle Average * | 10 | 19.7 -97% | 15 -50% | 19 -90% | 12.6 -26% | 18.9 ? -89% |
| Idle Maximum * | 13 | 20.7 -59% | 23 -77% | 27 -108% | 13 -0% | 26.7 ? -105% |
| Load Average * | 61 | 102.6 -68% | 123 -102% | 123 -102% | 84.1 -38% | 106.6 ? -75% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 118.9 | 184.3 -55% | 127.2 -7% | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 116.3 | 174.2 -50% | 124.5 -7% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 134 | 246.6 -84% | 241 -80% | 240 -79% | 177.6 -33% | 250 ? -87% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 191.3 | 143.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
事实上，它的电池寿命并不完全是最好的，这主要是因为它的容量太小。虽然笔记本的机箱空间更大，但宏碁只给 V 16 提供了 57 Wh 的电池容量。而竞争对手则可以达到 80 到 90 Wh。因此，在我们的 WLAN 测试中，在亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 的情况下，V 16 的续航时间只有不到 6 小时，只能算是一般水平。换句话说：还有很大的改进空间。
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 57 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | HP Victus 16 (2024) i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80.1 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 25% | 44% | -21% | 34% | 6% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 356 | 444 25% | 511 44% | 280 -21% | 478 34% | 376 ? 6% |
| H.264 | 576 | 316 | 824 | 409 ? | ||
| Load | 46 | 76 | 103 | 85.6 ? | ||
| Reader / Idle | 481 | 565 ? |
Notebookcheck 总评分
如果宏碁 Nitro V 16 拥有更强大的显示屏和更好的风扇控制，那么它将成为一款性价比极高的游戏笔记本电脑。不过，就其目前的状态而言，许多竞争对手都占据了优势。
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT
- 12/04/2024 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
