Geekom A8 评测:高级 0.5 升迷你 PC,配备 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS、32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘
微型 PC 的功能越来越强大,在日常性能方面丝毫不逊色于传统台式 PC。小型 PC 在效率方面也有很高的表现,从而推动了微型 PC 的使用。Geekom A8 基于 Geekom A7其优雅的设计给人留下了深刻的视觉印象。这款品质极高、功能强大的微型电脑的最高配置是基于 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB SSD。 如果您想购买 Geekom A8,目前需要支付约 950 欧元。基本配置的价格略低,为 799 欧元。不过,在实际使用中,性能应该与顶级机型相差不大,因为 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS完全相同,也有 8 个内核和 16 个线程。
Geekom A8 必须与 Geekom A7 竞争。尽管如此,我们还是要看看它与其他 Mini-PC 制造商的性能对比,他们的产品组合中也有非常强大的设备。我们在下表中列出了对比设备的概况。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Memory | Weight | Height |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.9 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 432 g | 38 mm |
87.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | 32768 MB | 863 g | 48.6 mm |
83.4 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 32768 MB | 768 g | 57 mm |
84.1 % | 04 / 2024 | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 545 g | 37 mm |
82.6 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 417 g | 38 mm |
82.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 615 g | 55 mm |
82.3 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 600 g | 58 mm |
Geekom A8 详细信息
外壳 - 坚固的 0.5 升铝制外壳
Geekom A8 采用与 Geekom A7采用了与 Geekom A7 相同的外壳,外观和质感都非常出色。外壳完全由铝合金制成,具有极高的稳定性,优雅的设计极具现代感。Geekom A8 和 Geekom A7 的体积约为 0.5 升,是最小巧的设备之一,同时还具有强大的计算能力。相比之下,Geekom A8 在桌面上占用的空间更小,而且重量仅为 400 多克,非常轻巧。
功能 - 包括 USB4 在内的多种连接
虽然 Geekom A8 极为小巧,但制造商为这款迷你电脑提供了多种连接选项。四个 USB Type-A 接口已经足够,在数量上,Geekom 与大众保持一致。Geekom A8 最先进的接口是 USB4,它可以极大地扩展应用的可能性。在测试中,我们将看看与外置显卡配合使用时的表现。屏幕可以直接通过 HDMI 接口连接,不过两个 USB-C 接口也可用于图像输出。总共可以同时操作四个屏幕。另一个积极的功能是位于左侧的快速 SD 读卡器。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Khadas Mind (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A5 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A7 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A8 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom Mini IT13 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Mini PC (15.1 - 214, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Khadas Mind (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A7 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A8 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom A5 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Geekom Mini IT13 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Mini PC (18.2 - 221, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
交流
Geekom A8 安装了联发科技 Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 无线局域网模块。在我们的测量中,其性能表现良好,非常适合日常使用。与同类产品相比,我们的测试样品仅在某些方面胜出一筹。无线模块可处理 2.4 GHz、5 GHz 和 6 GHz 频率范围。性能测试使用的是华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器。Geekom A8 还安装了一个 RJ45 插座,可用作替代网络连接。传输速率最高可达 2.5 GBit/s。
配件
交货范围包括 Geekom A8 和 120 瓦电源装置。包装盒内还包括一根 HDMI 电缆和一个 VESA 安装板。
维护
Geekom 出售的 A8 都是预配置的,这意味着你不一定要拆卸设备。不过,必要时可以拆下并更换内存和固态硬盘。要拆开设备,首先需要取下底部粘好的橡胶脚垫。下面有四颗固定螺钉,用于拆卸底板。这里要小心,因为 WLAN 天线电缆的活动空间不大,可能会损坏。底板下面还有一块金属板,如果要访问固态硬盘或内存,也需要取下这块金属板。WLAN 模块也可以更换,并非永久安装。CPU 风扇位于电路板的另一侧,如果不完全拆卸就无法触及。只要稍加操作,就可以从外壳中取出整个装置(电路板和冷却装置)。
性能 - AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS,8 核 16 线程
餈 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS确保了 Geekom A8 的出色运行速度。从技术上讲,该 SoC 基于 Zen4 架构,拥有 8 个内核和 16 个线程。如果你想购买更便宜的配置,Geekom A8 可以配备 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS时钟频率略低。
测试条件
我们使用平衡
电源计划进行了所有性能测试。在 BIOS 中没有更改 SoC 的性能和内存分配(512 MB),而是根据制造商的设置保持原样。BIOS 本身不提供任何更改选项。
处理器
我们的测试样品配备了 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS.它属于鹰点系列,仍然基于 Zen4 架构。与 7000 系列相比变化不大,这意味着 Geekom A8 在性能方面与 Geekom A7 没有特别大的区别。与最近推出的 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti的对决中,Geekom A8 只在某些地方胜出,但在实际使用中,你不会发现明显的差异。
有关进一步的比较和基准测试,请参阅我们的 CPU 对比表.
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
WinRAR - Result | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom A8 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Average of class Mini PC (561 - 51004, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Average of class Mini PC (3604 - 214250, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Average of class Mini PC (225 - 9399, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=118, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (1958 - 113499, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=118, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (74.8 - 2039, n=118, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (308 - 26952, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench R15 多回路
Cinebench R15 耐久性循环测试是我们的第一个耐久性测试,目的是了解散热系统与强大的 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS 的配合情况。开始时,我们看到处理器的性能相当稳定,但在后半段略有下降。在短期内,SoC 的可用功率高达 65 瓦,但在较长的负载情况下,功率仅略低于 50 瓦。Geekom A8 处理器的温度极限被定义为 90 °C。在性能比较中,这足以让我们的微型电脑获得第三名。只有 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti和 Acemagic F2A在这项测试中表现更好。
系统性能
Geekom A8 的系统性能非常出色。不过,这同样适用于已完成测试的其他测试设备。在日常使用中几乎不会有明显的差异。不过,差异是可以衡量的,即使在最高级别中仅有几个百分点的差异。在 Geekom A7在所有测试中都能轻松胜出。
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 89287, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 98398, n=118, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 98583, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
Geekom A8 在延迟方面表现不佳,即使使用 Edge 浏览器上网也会导致延迟值增加。开始播放 4K 测试视频后不久,延迟进一步增加。不过,Geekom A8 在播放高分辨率视频时没有任何问题。iGPU 的使用率明显较高,达到 60%。Geekom A7 的 iGPU Geekom A7的 iGPU 使用率仅为 30%。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Acemagic AM18 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Acemagic AM18 |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
迚ケ谿オ譎る俣 AMD Radeon 780M可以在多个竞争对手中找到。作为 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HSGeekom A8 也采用了这种现代图形处理器。在交付状态下,iGPU 仅保留 512 MB 内存。虽然不多,但可以通过 UEFI 进行调整。在相同配置下 Geekom A7的性能与较新的 A8 相当。在性能对比中,我们还可以看到 AMD 的 Radeon 780M 可以赶上 英特尔 Arc 8
进一步的比较和基准测试可参见我们的 图形处理器比较表.
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom A8 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | |
Room GPUs-only | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Sala GPUs-only | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 | |
Geekom A8 |
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A8 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic AM18 |
Geekom A8, AMD Radeon 780M R9 8945HS | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H | Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H | Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H | Geekom A7, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900HK | Acemagic AM18, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840HS | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 12 | -51% | -53% | -60% | 7% | -59% | 7% | -19% | |
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 87.4 | 49.7 -43% | 49.8 -43% | 40.1 -54% | 84.7 -3% | 40.2 -54% | 83.7 -4% | 75.4 ? -14% |
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 86.4 | 51.3 -41% | 48.2 -44% | 37.1 -57% | 89 3% | 35.9 -58% | 88.5 2% | 64.2 ? -26% |
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 55.1 | 22.7 -59% | 23.1 -58% | 26.9 -51% | 55.4 1% | 27.7 -50% | 56.3 2% | 37 ? -33% |
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) | 19 | 0.67 -96% | 0.91 -95% | 0.4 -98% | 20.7 9% | 0.4 -98% | 21.3 12% | 13.3 ? -30% |
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 75 | 58 -23% | 54.9 -27% | 38.3 -49% | 69.7 -7% | 39.8 -47% | 71.5 -5% | 64 ? -15% |
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 47.7 | 15.9 -67% | 16.9 -65% | 11.8 -75% | 60.5 27% | 12.2 -74% | 60.5 27% | 28.5 ? -40% |
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 25.8 | 19.9 -23% | 18.2 -29% | 16.6 -36% | 30.3 17% | 17.4 -33% | 30 16% | 35.3 ? 37% |
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 106 | 43 -59% | 42.7 -60% | 45.3 -57% | 116 9% | 47.3 -55% | 116 9% | 72.4 ? -32% |
SPECviewperf 13 | -50% | -51% | -56% | 5% | -57% | 7% | -14% | |
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 85.8 | 48.5 -43% | 46.4 -46% | 40.1 -53% | 83.9 -2% | 39.9 -53% | 83.1 -3% | 74.8 ? -13% |
Catia (catia-05) | 126 | 76.8 -39% | 71.6 -43% | 51.3 -59% | 130 3% | 51.6 -59% | 129 2% | 91.4 ? -27% |
Creo (creo-02) | 92.8 | 29.3 -68% | 29.6 -68% | 41.1 -56% | 93.4 1% | 40.2 -57% | 92 -1% | 73 ? -21% |
Energy (energy-02) | 22.6 | 5.27 -77% | 5.69 -75% | 4.5 -80% | 23.8 5% | 4.39 -81% | 24.1 7% | 17.7 ? -22% |
Maya (maya-05) | 103 | 62.5 -39% | 59.5 -42% | 47.5 -54% | 107 4% | 48.3 -53% | 108 5% | 97.5 ? -5% |
Medical (medical-02) | 69.2 | 25 -64% | 29.7 -57% | 14.4 -79% | 77.6 12% | 14.4 -79% | 79 14% | 37.6 ? -46% |
Showcase (showcase-02) | 24.2 | 19.9 -18% | 18.2 -25% | 17.3 -29% | 25.4 5% | 17.3 -29% | 29.9 24% | 35 ? 45% |
Solidworks (sw-04) | 97.3 | 45.6 -53% | 44.8 -54% | 57.1 -41% | 109 12% | 57.4 -41% | 107 10% | 76.6 ? -21% |
SPECviewperf 2020 | -56% | -58% | -69% | -11% | -68% | -9% | -24% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 10.9 | 4.23 -61% | 5.05 -54% | 3.49 -68% | 11.1 2% | 3.48 -68% | 13 19% | 7.59 ? -30% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 31 | 6.03 -81% | 4.61 -85% | 3.05 -90% | 14.1 -55% | 3 -90% | 14.2 -54% | 10.5 ? -66% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 35.6 | 18.5 -48% | 17.9 -50% | 14.8 -58% | 31.4 -12% | 15.1 -58% | 31.2 -12% | 29.6 ? -17% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 24.6 | 11.1 -55% | 10 -59% | 7.78 -68% | 24.8 1% | 8.08 -67% | 24.7 0% | 18.1 ? -26% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 21 | 14.9 -29% | 12.9 -39% | 9.69 -54% | 20.9 0% | 9.78 -53% | 20.7 -1% | 21.7 ? 3% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 65.9 | 6.24 -91% | 5.7 -91% | 6.29 -90% | 61.4 -7% | 6.67 -90% | 61.1 -7% | 37.5 ? -43% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 50.1 | 37.7 -25% | 35.4 -29% | 23.9 -52% | 47 -6% | 24.4 -51% | 46.7 -7% | 56.3 ? 12% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -52% /
-52% | -54% /
-54% | -62% /
-61% | 0% /
1% | -61% /
-61% | 2% /
2% | -19% /
-19% |
3DMark 05 Standard | 55721 points | |
3DMark 06 Score 1366x768 | 45913 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 41775 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 13321 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 168113 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37487 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7670 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4072 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3264 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
迚ケ谿オ譎る俣 AMD Radeon 780M虽然只是一款 iGPU,但它具有良好的 3D 性能,可以玩一些游戏。为了达到足够的帧速率,必须接受细节水平方面的一些限制。游戏性能在很大程度上取决于相关游戏,不能一概而论。
要详细了解 iGPU 与其他显卡相比的性能,请参阅我们的 GPU 游戏列表.
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Khadas Mind | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom Mini IT12 |
GTA V | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Khadas Mind | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Khadas Mind | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
Geekom Mini IT12 |
F1 2020 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A8 | |
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
Geekom A8 | |
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
Geekom Mini IT12 |
Witcher 3 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 166.9 | 159 | 64.7 | 24.9 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 153.5 | 88.3 | 46.2 | 32.4 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 159.7 | 122.9 | 88.3 | 82.25 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 54.4 | 25.1 | 19.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 66.3 | 47.8 | 39.9 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 88 | 49 | 42 | 41 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 74.1 | 66.9 | 56.9 | 49.2 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 65.9 | 26.5 | 23.4 | 22.4 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 76 | 46 | 44 | 41 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 89.2 | 37.4 | 28.9 | 24.1 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 102.5 | 42.8 | 27.8 | 24.3 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 197.3 | 96.9 | 76.4 | 53.2 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 216 | 104.9 | 80.9 | 34.9 |
God of War (2022) | 24.7 | 19.5 | 15.2 | 11.3 |
GRID Legends (2022) | 103.4 | 74.6 | 56.4 | 42 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 62 | 42.5 | 32.7 | 29.8 |
F1 22 (2022) | 94.8 | 85.4 | 62.6 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 76 | 65.8 | 48.2 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 44 | 33.7 | 22.4 | 20.4 |
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 179.9 | 137.7 | 127.1 |
配备两个 eGPU 的 Geekom A8 性能测试
Geekom A8 提供了一个 USB4 端口,这使我们可以结合外置显卡对这款迷你电脑进行测试。我们结合 GPD G1、Razer Core X 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 对该设备进行了测试。与 Geekom A8 的 iGPU 相比,这两种图形解决方案的性能都有明显提升。与其他设备相比,性能的提升处于类似水平。GPD G1 与之差距不大,结合 OCuLink 接口后,性能可提高约 10%。在 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti配备了这样的接口,可作为对比概述中的参考机型。
Geekom A8 和 GPD G1(AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT)
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
2560x1440 Speed Way Score | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Night Raid Graphics Score | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) |
Unigine Superposition | |
1280x720 720p Low | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 176.8 | 171.4 | 146.1 | 83 | 62.7 | 70.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 171.8 | 121.5 | 123.5 | 101 | 72.9 | 53.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 93.2 | 70.6 | 67.6 | 55.3 | 53.7 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 204 | 129.9 | 84.9 | 64.8 | 36.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 69.9 | 49.9 | 37.5 | 29.4 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 115 | 95 | 93 | 85 | 80 | 51 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 237 | 179.1 | 166.7 | 152 | 109 | 61.3 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 174.4 | 127.9 | 121.4 | 102.7 | 64.3 | 27.8 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 108 | 78 | 74 | 65 | 63 | 53 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 76 | 46.3 | 48 | 41.6 | 38.9 | 20 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 104.7 | 93.1 | 84.6 | 75.3 | 59.4 | 31.9 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 290 | 193 | 162.6 | 113.4 | 90.6 | 56.5 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 278 | 225 | 151.2 | 86 | 64.3 | 33.4 |
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 97.9 | 85.6 | 74.3 | 58.7 | 56.7 | |
God of War (2022) | 76.5 | 75.9 | 74.3 | 66.1 | 53 | 34.1 |
GRID Legends (2022) | 108.1 | 87.1 | 68.3 | 61.2 | 56.5 | 44.5 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 171.7 | 129.1 | 88.7 | 72.8 | 50.6 | 27.8 |
F1 22 (2022) | 121.7 | 115.9 | 90.1 | 42.2 | 29.3 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 127.6 | 139.3 | 114.6 | 31.7 | 15.8 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 89.2 | 75.8 | 65.4 | 59.7 | 40.3 | 18.7 |
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 79 | 72 | 66 | 53 | 42 | 27 |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 278.3 | 158.7 | 107.2 | 83.5 | 60.3 | 32.5 |
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 38 | 34 | 20 | 19 | 12 | |
Skull & Bones (2024) | 84 | 76 | 62 | 50 | 39 | 24 |
Geekom A8 和 Razer Core X(NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti)
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
2560x1440 Speed Way Score | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Night Raid Graphics Score | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) |
Unigine Superposition | |
1280x720 720p Low | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 184.6 | 180 | 171.6 | 107.6 | 94.5 | 101.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 256 | 174.9 | 130.4 | 65.6 | 57.2 | 68 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 176.7 | 160.6 | 153.2 | 142 | 112.5 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 216 | 146.3 | 100.1 | 79 | 48.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 140.5 | 124.3 | 95 | 80.6 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 159 | 137 | 131 | 122 | 100 | 59 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 236 | 187.1 | 177.7 | 166 | 133.7 | 84.6 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 154.5 | 121.1 | 118.1 | 112.1 | 91 | 46.6 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 134 | 117 | 112 | 101 | 92 | 60 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 138 | 89.5 | 67.7 | 51.2 | 44.9 | 33.4 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 139.6 | 124.1 | 103.2 | 85 | 65.5 | 38.7 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 231 | 140.8 | 139 | 110.1 | 94.1 | 61.4 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 162 | 126.8 | 80.8 | 60.6 | 54.3 | 46.5 |
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 82.7 | 70.9 | 59.9 | 51.9 | 50.1 | |
God of War (2022) | 113.1 | 99.9 | 83.8 | 62.9 | 56.9 | 40.4 |
GRID Legends (2022) | 126 | 97.5 | 81.6 | 69.3 | 63 | 50.5 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 177.6 | 140.4 | 100.7 | 81.8 | 62 | 36.3 |
F1 22 (2022) | 71.7 | 65 | 50.8 | 32.2 | 30.5 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 80.3 | 80.5 | 63 | 40 | 34.4 | 15.2 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 110.1 | 90.4 | 78.2 | 78.3 | 60.7 | 37 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 96.6 | 81.2 | 71.5 | 63.5 | 44.4 | 22.3 |
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 89 | 82 | 79 | 61 | 53 | 33 |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 302.4 | 176.2 | 104.3 | 79 | 63.2 | 39.3 |
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 68 | 64 | 55 | 42 | 30 | 11 |
Skull & Bones (2024) | 84 | 78 | 69 | 53 | 47 | 31 |
F1 24 (2024) | 88.1 | 84.5 | 69.8 | 46.1 | 35.3 | 15.5 |
排放量
噪音排放
Geekom A8 是一款极其紧凑的微型电脑,这意味着设备中只能容纳一个很小的散热装置。在无负载的情况下,该设备几乎是静音运行,几乎听不到任何声音。不过,在负载情况下,情况就会发生变化。也就是说,我们没有看到平均负载和最大负载之间有太大的差别,这意味着即使在低负载情况下,Geekom A8 也能很快发出声音。在峰值时,我们测得的声压级略高于 49 dB(A)。只有 Acemagic F2A在我们的测试中达到了类似的高值,而 Geekom A7在负载情况下要安静得多。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.5 / 24.7 / 24.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 48.5 / 49.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.4 dB(A) |
Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -1% | -3% | -12% | -5% | -7% | |
off / environment * | 24.4 | 24.1 1% | 24.9 -2% | 25.4 -4% | 25.4 -4% | 25.4 -4% | 24.8 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.5 | 29.8 -22% | 25.4 -4% | 28 -14% | 33.3 -36% | 27.5 -12% | 31 -27% |
Idle Average * | 24.7 | 29.9 -21% | 25.7 -4% | 28.1 -14% | 33.6 -36% | 28 -13% | 31.2 -26% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.7 | 30 -21% | 25.7 -4% | 28.5 -15% | 33.7 -36% | 33 -34% | 31.4 -27% |
Load Average * | 48.5 | 37.3 23% | 47.8 1% | 39.6 18% | 43.3 11% | 42.8 12% | 37.1 24% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 47 | 40.2 14% | 45.23 4% | 47.2 -0% | 43.2 8% | 44.5 5% | 37.6 20% |
Load Maximum * | 49.2 | 43.5 12% | 49 -0% | 44.2 10% | 43.3 12% | 44.9 9% | 53.7 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Geekom A8 的铝制外壳在空转时会明显发热。不过,这并不是问题,即使在负载情况下温度也只是微升。表面温度有时甚至会下降,这表明风扇在空闲时几乎不工作,因此设备本身会积聚更多的热量。
在压力测试中,AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS 的发热温度高达 85.5 °C。这并不是一个临界值,尤其是它只出现了很短的时间。在较长时间内,CPU 的温度稳定在 77 °C以下。SoC 的功耗为 35 瓦,符合制造商的规格要求。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.2 °C / 97 F
(-) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 32.2 °C / 90 F.
耗电量
能源需求和由此产生的效率是 Geekom A8 的优势。我们已经在 Geekom A7 上看到了这一趋势。两款机型在这方面非常接近。特别是在空闲模式下,Geekom 的功耗很低。在平均负载下,我们测试设备的功耗为 71 瓦。Geekom A8 仅在短时间内达到 93.2 瓦的峰值。电源由一个 120 瓦的小型电源装置提供。
Off / Standby | 1.4 / 2.7 Watt |
Idle | 3.2 / 4.9 / 6.8 Watt |
Load |
71.3 / 93.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Average AMD Radeon 780M | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -78% | -80% | -57% | -3% | -117% | -96% | -38% | -87% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 8.2 -156% | 9.1 -184% | 5.7 -78% | 3.8 -19% | 12.1 -278% | 9.8 -206% | 6.29 ? -97% | 9.48 ? -196% |
Idle Average * | 4.9 | 12.1 -147% | 10.3 -110% | 9.5 -94% | 4.8 2% | 13.2 -169% | 11.5 -135% | 8.47 ? -73% | 11.5 ? -135% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.8 | 14 -106% | 14.4 -112% | 16.5 -143% | 6.5 4% | 14.1 -107% | 15.3 -125% | 10.9 ? -60% | 14.9 ? -119% |
Load Average * | 71.3 | 53.1 26% | 54.9 23% | 53.3 25% | 71.9 -1% | 82.9 -16% | 75.3 -6% | 56.4 ? 21% | 57.4 ? 19% |
Load Maximum * | 93.2 | 100.4 -8% | 110.4 -18% | 87.8 6% | 94.7 -2% | 106.8 -15% | 102.8 -10% | 75.7 ? 19% | 97.5 ? -5% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption with the external monitor
Power consumption with the external monitor
Pros
Cons
结论 - 0.5 升的小巧机箱却能提供强劲动力
Geekom A8 是一款极其小巧的电脑--体积仅为 0.5 升,但性能却非常出色。配置 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS可以持续显示出很高的工作速度。32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB SDD 硬盘为您提供了充足的配置。不过,由于设计紧凑,SoC 只能以最低的功耗运行。尽管如此,Geekom 还是能轻松胜任日常工作。在与 Geekom A7 的直接比较中,A8 稍逊一筹。
Geekom A8 采用了与 Geekom A7 相同的设计。做工精良的外壳不仅在视觉上极具质感,而且手感也令人信服。如果说有什么不足的话,那就是拆卸过程值得批评。不过,由于 Geekom 始终销售预配置的 A8,这一点可以忽略不计。作为 Ryzen 9 型号的替代品,Geekom A8 还可以订购 Ryzen 7 8845HS(799 欧元)。这样可以省下一些钱,虽然性能应该不会明显下降。不过,在固态硬盘配置方面,你必须做出选择,因为 Geekom 只提供配备 1 TB 固态硬盘的 Ryzen 7 型号。
Geekom A8 是一款性能出色的时尚迷你 PC。加上出色的做工和高品质的选材,Geekom A8 堪称高端迷你 PC。
在外部接口的选择上,Geekom A8 也无可挑剔。这款小型计算设备提供了多种连接选择,USB4 是最先进的接口,可以扩展应用范围。如果快速 iGPU(又名 AMD Radeon 780M)的性能还不够,Geekom A8 还可以通过外接显卡变身为强大的游戏电脑。
在设计方面,Geekom A8 和 Geekom A7 是我们迄今为止测试过的最漂亮的迷你 PC 之一。不过,紧凑的设计也带来了一些问题和限制。例如,外部接口在机身后部非常靠近。负载情况下的噪音水平是另一个值得批评的地方。我们希望看到制造商能提供稍好的散热装置。
价格和供应情况
Geekom A8 目前的售价为 949 欧元(1030 美元),我们评测的版本为 949 欧元(1030 美元)。用户可以直接从上订购这款迷你电脑。.此外,还可以通过亚马逊订购 Geekom A8。
Geekom A8
- 05/24/2024 v7 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.