Geekom XT13 Pro 评测:NUC 迷你 PC 没有流星湖,只有英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H
Geekom XT13 Pro 继承了 Geekom XT12 Pro的顶级配置,搭载 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H配置。此外,还配备了 32 GB DDR4 内存和 2 TB SSD,不过这也是有代价的。售价为999 欧元,因此并不便宜。售价769欧元的 Geekom XT13 Pro 配备了 英特尔酷睿 i7-13620H和 1 TB 固态硬盘。Geekom 决定不使用较新的 Meteor Lake 处理器,而是坚持使用较旧的 Raptor Lake 处理器。这次测试将显示这种方式是否能在竞争中立于不败之地。
问题还在于这种定价是否合理。在性能分析之后,我们还将专门讨论这一重要问题。无论如何,制造商本身都设定了很高的标准。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Memory | Weight | Height |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
72.4 % | v8 | 08/2024 | Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 555 g | 37 mm |
80.8 % | v8 | 06/2024 | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 653 g | 60 mm |
87.5 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | 32768 MB | 863 g | 48.6 mm |
83.4 % | v7 (old) | 04/2024 | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 32768 MB | 768 g | 57 mm |
84.1 % | v8 | 04/2024 | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 545 g | 37 mm |
82.6 % | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | 32768 MB | 417 g | 38 mm |
注:我们已经更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 这里.
外壳 - 金属与塑料的完美结合
Geekom XT13 Pro 的外壳很熟悉,它曾用于 Geekom XT12 Pro。与英特尔 NUC 13 Pro 桌面版套件的相似之处也不容否认。基本上,外观没有任何问题。我们的测试样品再次完美完成,一切都配合得天衣无缝。尽管如此,我们还是希望看到一个新的外壳,使其与内部竞争产品略有不同。这款迷你电脑在桌面上仅占 11.7 x 11.2 厘米,是较为紧凑的设备之一。Geekom XT13 Pro 还可以使用附带的 VESA 支架直接连接到显示器上。
设备 - 选购齐全,2 个 USB4
在外部接口方面,Geekom XT13 Pro 拥有与 Geekom XT12 Pro 相同的选项。虽然设备非常小巧,但连接方式却多种多样。背面的两个 USB-C 接口是现代的 USB4 接口,只要有合适的配件,就能大大扩展应用范围。总共可以同时操作四个屏幕,还有一个局域网连接。
交流
Geekom XT13 Pro 采用了知名的无线模块,Geekom 的许多设备都安装了该模块。联发科 Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 WLAN 模块在我们的测试设备中可以提供足够的性能。不过,如果可能,应主要使用 6 GHz 频率范围。另外,也可以使用电缆连接。数据传输速率最高可达 2.5 GBit/s。
配件
Geekom XT13 Pro 的交货范围符合常规标准。除设备本身外,包装盒内还包括 120 瓦电源装置和带安装材料的 VESA 支架。 此外,还包括一根 HDMI 电缆和 Geekom 必备的感谢卡。
维护
Geekom XT13 Pro 很容易打开。只需拧松底部的四颗小螺丝,即可将底板固定到机箱的其他部分。底板上有一个固态硬盘散热器,因此在这一点上要更加小心。内存和大容量存储器都可以轻松访问。在我们的案例中,可以安装额外的固态硬盘。不过,这里必须遵守正确的标准,因为只兼容长度为 42 毫米的 SATA 固态硬盘。
可持续性
Geekom XT13 Pro 的包装盒比较大,有很多 "空气"。我们看到 Geekom 的做法与众不同。此外,所提供的标准配件被装在单独的塑料袋中,这在可持续性方面有待改进。设备本身主要由金属和塑料制成。不过,我们不知道在制造过程中是否使用了可回收材料。值得肯定的是,制造商提供 36 个月的保修服务。
性能 - 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H,14 个内核,20 个线程
Geekom XT13 Pro 的最高配置为 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H的顶级配置。此外,NUC PC 还可配备性能稍弱的 英特尔酷睿 i7-13620H它也配备了 6P 内核,在性能方面与顶级机型相比应该只是略逊一筹。虽然快速的 NVMe 固态硬盘提供了坚实的基本配置,但 32 GB DDR4 内存始终包括在内。对于性能要求较高的应用来说,Geekom XT13 Pro 也并非不可逾越的任务。不过,iGPU 的 3D 性能是最大的软肋,但通过使用 eGPU 可以明显改善。
测试条件
在 Geekom XT13 Pro 的所有性能测试中,我们都使用了 "高性能 "能源配置文件。根据我们的测试标准,仅在功耗和噪音测量中存在偏差。 测试标准.根据制造商的规格,Geekom 允许 SoC 以最低的功耗运行。用数字表示,这意味着连续负载下的功耗限制为 35 瓦,但允许短时间内达到 64 瓦。
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H基于 Raptor Lake 架构,结合了 6P 和 8E 内核。从技术上讲,有 英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H的基准测试结果与 极客 XT12 Pro.不过,在细节方面,我们确实看到英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 略胜一筹,其多核性能略胜一筹,可以引起人们的注意。一个 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS或英特尔较新的流星湖系列机型。不过,与竞争对手稍快的机型相比,差距并不大。在日常使用中,由于差异较小,性能上不存在明显差异。
你可以在这里找到更多关于处理器的基准测试 这里.
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench 2024 | |
CPU Multi Core | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
CPU Single Core | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
wPrime 2.10 | |
32m | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
1024m | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 |
WinRAR - Result | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
Geekbench 5.0 | |
5.0 Multi-Core | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
5.0 Single-Core | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (561 - 51004, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (3604 - 214250, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (225 - 9399, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=121, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (1958 - 113499, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=121, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (74.8 - 2039, n=121, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (308 - 26952, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Cinebench R15 多回路
我们测试样本的 Cinebench R15 连续循环几乎与 Geekom XT12 Pro 并行。不过,较新的 XT13 Pro 最终还是以明显的优势领先。此外,我们还发现,小型散热系统无法长时间维持 SoC 的 Turbo。64 瓦的最大功率限制只能在很短的时间内达到,因为由于温度过高,功耗不得不降低。
系统性能
在系统性能测试中,Geekom XT13 Pro 的记录性能仅够排名垫底。不过,主观而言,我们可以说 Geekom XT13 Pro 的性能还算不错。在测试阶段,我们在使用该设备时没有发现任何明显的延迟现象。说到内存的选择,从 AIDA64 基准测试中可以看出,速度较慢的 DDR4 标准遭到了报复。从技术上讲 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H可以与 DDR5(5200MT/s)结合使用。
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 76462, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 83287, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 89318, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在 Geekom XT13 Pro 上,我们没有看到过长的 DPC 延迟。在 Geekom XT12 Pro.尽管如此,我们的测试样本远未达到出色的结果。即使只是使用 Edge 浏览器冲浪,我们也达到了最大值。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
Geekom XT13 Pro 配备了宏碁 2 TB 存储空间的固态硬盘。同样的型号已经在 Geekom GT13在所有测试中都表现出色。技术连接是最佳的,因此传输速率非常高。在连续负载的情况下,宏碁 N7000 在保持读取性能稳定方面略有问题。幸运的是,并没有出现极端不利的情况。从图中可以看出,宏碁 N7000 在读取性能降低的情况下,性能仍然明显优于 Geekom XT12 Pro或 Acemagic F2A.在对 Geekom XT12 Pro 的测试中,我们发现了散热垫位置的问题,而 Geekom XT13 Pro 的情况并非如此。散热垫的位置是正确的。正如我们在维护部分提到的,Geekom XT13 Pro 可以安装额外的固态硬盘。不过,第二个 M.2 插槽仅支持长度为 42 毫米(M.2-2242)的 SATA 固态硬盘。
如需进一步比较和基准测试,请参阅我们的 比较表.
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形
英特尔 英特尔 Iris Xe 图形处理器 G7处理 3D 计算并负责图像输出。英特尔 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H是该系列中速度最快的机型。不过,这款过时的机型很难与现代的代表机型相抗衡。如果 Geekom 敢于在 XT13 Pro 中安装流星湖 SoC,那么 3D 性能的提升将是显而易见的。英特尔 Arc 8 核 iGPU 的性能完全可以从对比数据中看出来。同时,如果在系统中安装 AMD Radeon 780M,3D 性能会更高。目前,Geekom 自身也提供了多款配备该 iGPU 的设备,这意味着该制造商在这一领域的日子不好过。其中一个例子是 Geekom A7和 Geekom A8或 Geekom AE7.
更多比较和基准测试可参见我们的 GPU 对照表.
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom A7 |
Unigine Superposition | |
1280x720 720p Low | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | |
Room GPUs-only | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Sala GPUs-only | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 |
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom A7 |
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H | Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M R7 8845HS | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H | Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H | Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H | Geekom A7, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 2020 | 309% | 36% | 25% | -4% | 278% | 203% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 3.63 | 11.2 209% | 4.23 17% | 5.05 39% | 3.49 -4% | 11.1 206% | 7.72 ? 113% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 3.15 | 19.9 532% | 6.03 91% | 4.61 46% | 3.05 -3% | 14.1 348% | 11.2 ? 256% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 16 | 33.4 109% | 18.5 16% | 17.9 12% | 14.8 -7% | 31.4 96% | 30.9 ? 93% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 7.9 | 23.2 194% | 11.1 41% | 10 27% | 7.78 -2% | 24.8 214% | 19 ? 141% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 10.3 | 20.4 98% | 14.9 45% | 12.9 25% | 9.69 -6% | 20.9 103% | 22.3 ? 117% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 6.13 | 64.1 946% | 6.24 2% | 5.7 -7% | 6.29 3% | 61.4 902% | 41.8 ? 582% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 26.8 | 47.7 78% | 37.7 41% | 35.4 32% | 23.9 -11% | 47 75% | 58.9 ? 120% |
3DMark 05 Standard | 29045 points | |
3DMark 06 Score 1366x768 | 30156 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 28599 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 8024 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 155640 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28112 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5448 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2570 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1920 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 183 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 1276 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
英特尔 Iris Xe iGPU 无法应对大多数游戏。老化的 iGPU 只能在低分辨率和中低图形预设下实现足够的帧率。如果你还想用 Geekom XT13 Pro 玩游戏,就必须绕道使用外置显卡。有多种型号的显卡可通过 USB4 与设备一起使用。
Dota 2 Reborn | |
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
GTA V | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Geekom A7 | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Aoostar GEM12 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 123.5 | 105.9 | 22.1 | 9 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 117.2 | 82.9 | 72.5 | 66.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 46 | 25.7 | 18.2 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 19.9 | 15.4 | 13.5 | 13 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 18.6 | 15 | 13 | 11.4 |
F1 24 (2024) | 43.1 | 37.3 | 26.7 |
使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 进行 Geekom XT13 Pro 性能测试
Geekom XT13 Pro 有两个 USB4 端口,支持使用外置显卡。在不影响整体效果的前提下,我们使用 Razer Core X 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 进行了一些测试。与英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 老化的 iGPU 相比,3D 性能大幅提升。与其他测试设备相比,合成测试的结果几乎完全相同。从测试的游戏中可以看出,这种组合也能显著提高游戏性能。有时,即使是最现代的游戏也能享受到完整的细节。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Unigine Superposition | |
1280x720 720p Low | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) |
Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9 | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) |
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H | Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-13900H | Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-13900H | Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-12900H | Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), Ultra 5 125H | Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), R9 7940HS | Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), R9 8945HS | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 2020 | 391% | 387% | 321% | 182% | 395% | 516% | 203% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 3.63 | 13 258% | 10.8 198% | 11.8 225% | 10.9 200% | 13 258% | 10.8 198% | 7.72 ? 113% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 3.15 | 20.9 563% | 21 567% | 18.9 500% | 17.8 465% | 20.9 563% | 50.3 1497% | 11.2 ? 256% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 16 | 74.2 364% | 76.4 378% | 62.7 292% | 26.6 66% | 76.8 380% | 76.6 379% | 30.9 ? 93% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 7.9 | 39.4 399% | 40.1 408% | 32.8 315% | 23.6 199% | 39.2 396% | 38.8 391% | 19 ? 141% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 10.3 | 47.2 358% | 47.3 359% | 40 288% | 28.7 179% | 46.5 351% | 45.9 346% | 22.3 ? 117% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 6.13 | 16.5 169% | 16.5 169% | 15.2 148% | 11.4 86% | 16.6 171% | 16.6 171% | 41.8 ? 582% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 26.8 | 194 624% | 196 631% | 155 478% | 47.5 77% | 199 643% | 195 628% | 58.9 ? 120% |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 182.2 | 178.4 | 170.3 | 104.2 | 92.7 | 103.4 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 165.8 | 138.3 | 132 | 121.9 | 104.6 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 183.7 | 142.2 | 98.8 | 77.6 | 48.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 146.4 | 137.9 | 106.3 | 92.1 | ||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 113 | 91.3 | 79 | 78.5 | 61.6 | 37.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 88.2 | 81.4 | 71.7 | 64.4 | 44.5 | 22.2 |
F1 24 (2024) | 76.9 | 73.1 | 60.5 | 42.2 | 36.9 | 19.2 |
排放 - 冷却能力弱,耗电量低
噪音排放
即使是相同设计的设备,在噪音排放方面也无法给人留下深刻印象。Geekom XT13 Pro 也是如此,至少在负载情况下是如此。微型电脑在空闲时非常安静,几乎听不到噪音。不过,风扇始终在运转,这意味着半被动运行是不可能的。在负载情况下,风扇偶尔会大幅转动,我们测得的峰值声压级为 49.5 dB(A)。不过,最大音量并不总是存在。在压力测试中,风扇转速反复波动,因此 Geekom XT13 Pro 在负载情况下仅达到 38 dB(A)。我们在平均负载下也观察到了同样的现象。在这里,可测量音量在 38 到 42.2 dB(A) 之间波动。
。
遗憾的是,Geekom XT12 Pro 并不是最安静的设备之一。只有在空转时,设备才能几乎无声地工作,只能听到风扇发出的轻微噪音。但在负载情况下,这种情况就会发生变化,因为微型电脑的噪音可明显达到 44.2 dB(A)。在游戏过程中,我们甚至能测出高达 47.2 分贝(A)的噪音。不过,我们无法在游戏过程中检测到持续的高声压级。测试结果在 39 和 47.2 dB(A) 之间波动。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 27.6 / 27.8 / 27.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 42.2 / 49.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 10% | 1% | 2% | 2% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 24.3 3% | 24.1 4% | 24.9 -0% | 25.4 -2% | 25.4 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 27.6 | 27.5 -0% | 29.8 -8% | 25.4 8% | 28 -1% | 33.3 -21% |
Idle Average * | 27.8 | 27.6 1% | 29.9 -8% | 25.7 8% | 28.1 -1% | 33.6 -21% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.9 | 27.6 1% | 30 -8% | 25.7 8% | 28.5 -2% | 33.7 -21% |
Load Average * | 42.2 | 36 15% | 37.3 12% | 47.8 -13% | 39.6 6% | 43.3 -3% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 46.6 | 35.4 24% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 49.5 | 38.2 23% | 43.5 12% | 49 1% | 44.2 11% | 43.3 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.4 | 40.2 | 45.23 | 47.2 | 43.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在负载情况下,外壳会明显发热。不过,我们找不到任何临界值。SoC 看起来有些不同,因为 Geekom 没有限制最高温度,在负载情况下温度很快就达到了 100 °C。与 Cinebench R15 多环测试不同,英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 在压力测试中没有超过 64 瓦限制。SoC 发热过快,性能不得不降低。经过较长时间后,温度稳定在 90°C 左右,这对处理器来说不成问题。由于设计极为紧凑,因此无法安装更强大的冷却系统。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.9 °C / 89 F.
耗电量
与竞争对手相比,Geekom XT13 Pro 的功耗非常低。即使在空闲模式下,我们测得的数值也很低。英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 的低功耗限制(PL1 和 PL2)确保了负载下相对较低的能耗要求。在平均负载情况下,系统的能耗略低于 50 瓦。在负载情况下,我们只能在系统仍能使用 Turbo 的短时间内看到 94.5 瓦的功耗。我们还观察到了一个有点奇怪的现象。 在 Cinebench R23 Sigle 测试中,我们记录了大量的峰值,这在其他测试设备中从未见过。我们重复了几次测试,结果都一样。我们有理由认为,在这种情况下,SoC 会反复在极限温度下工作,从而允许它短暂地吸收更多电能。电源由一个 120 瓦的小型电源装置提供。许多 Geekom 设备都配备了相同的电源装置。
Off / Standby | 1.6 / 2.8 Watt |
Idle | 6.3 / 7.1 / 9 Watt |
Load |
49.8 / 94.5 Watt |
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -38% | -34% | -35% | -21% | 11% | 2% | -40% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.3 | 8.2 -30% | 8.2 -30% | 9.1 -44% | 5.7 10% | 3.8 40% | 5.35 ? 15% | 9.72 ? -54% |
Idle Average * | 7.1 | 10 -41% | 12.1 -70% | 10.3 -45% | 9.5 -34% | 4.8 32% | 8.56 ? -21% | 11.7 ? -65% |
Idle Maximum * | 9 | 14.6 -62% | 14 -56% | 14.4 -60% | 16.5 -83% | 6.5 28% | 10.8 ? -20% | 15.1 ? -68% |
Load Average * | 49.8 | 73.9 -48% | 53.1 -7% | 54.9 -10% | 53.3 -7% | 71.9 -44% | 45.4 ? 9% | 55.8 ? -12% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 54 | 79.9 -48% | ||||||
Load Maximum * | 94.5 | 95.3 -1% | 100.4 -6% | 110.4 -17% | 87.8 7% | 94.7 -0% | 67.6 ? 28% | 93.4 ? 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Efficiency
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Power Consumption | |
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor) | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom XT12 Pro |
Power consumption with external monitor
Power consumption with external monitor
Pros
Cons
结论--价格高但性能不高
Geekom XT13 Pro 是一款功能强大的迷你 PC。不过,Geekom XT12 Pro 已经证明了这一点。如果我们仅将这两款产品进行比较,你可以选择较旧的设备,而不会有任何明显的性能损失。英特尔 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900HGeekom XT13 Pro 的英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 无法带来明显的性能提升。与英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H 相比,技术差异太小。Geekom 不敢大胆迈出基于流星湖系列的迷你 PC 这一步。这意味着 Geekom 被甩在了后面,因为许多其他厂商已经在其型号系列中配备了英特尔的最新处理器。Geekom XT13 Pro 的最大缺点是 iGPU,在所有测试中都不如现代代表产品。不过,Geekom 在这方面不仅不如竞争对手,也不如自己。Geekom 自己的产品组合包括采用最新 AMD SoC 的迷你电脑,它们在技术上并不逊色,但在全面性能上却更胜一筹。我们甚至还没看价格。不幸的是,Geekom XT13 Pro 的价格完全超出了我们的预期。如果要成为顶级机型,目前的价格是 999 欧元。其他迷你电脑价格稍低,但性能更高。
Geekom XT13 Pro 配备英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 处理器,性能足够出色,而且功能多样,令人印象深刻。不过,Geekom XT13 Pro 的性价比完全不匹配。
值得肯定的是,Geekom XT13 Pro 具有良好的连接性,这也是 Geekom 过去屡屡加分的原因。在众多接口中,包括两个 USB4 端口,这可能会影响购买决策的未来性。制造商提供的三年保修服务也对 Geekom 的产品有利。当然,该制造商生产的其他设备也同样享有保修服务。与 Geekom XT12 Pro 相比,效率只能略有提高。在这方面,英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 显然不如更现代的流星湖处理器。因此,即使考虑到高昂的售价,我们也无法给 Geekom XT13 Pro 推荐购买。如果 Geekom XT13 Pro 不想成为 "货架上的暖男",Geekom 急需修改目前的定价。
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击 这里.
Geekom XT13 Pro
-
07/30/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade
Transparency
The present review sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.