Geekom XT13 Pro 评测：NUC 迷你 PC 没有流星湖，只有英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H

Name: Geekom XT13 Pro
Brand: Geekom

进展有限！

Geekom 推出的 XT13 Pro 是一款基于英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 的强大 NUC 迷你 PC。这意味着英特尔的流星湖处理器仍然被排除在外。我们通过大量的测量和基准测试，分析了 Raptor Lake H 系列高端机型与较新处理器的性能对比情况。

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/05/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Mini PC Desktop Intel Raptor Lake Windows Thunderbolt

Geekom XT13 Pro 继承了 Geekom XT12 Pro的顶级配置，搭载英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H配置。此外，还配备了 32 GB DDR4 内存和 2 TB SSD，不过这也是有代价的。售价为999 欧元，因此并不便宜。售价769欧元的 Geekom XT13 Pro 配备了英特尔酷睿 i7-13620H和 1 TB 固态硬盘。Geekom 决定不使用较新的 Meteor Lake 处理器，而是坚持使用较旧的 Raptor Lake 处理器。这次测试将显示这种方式是否能在竞争中立于不败之地。

问题还在于这种定价是否合理。在性能分析之后，我们还将专门讨论这一重要问题。无论如何，制造商本身都设定了很高的标准。

Test device courtesy of Geekom

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Geekom XT13 Pro

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, Raptor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 32.0.101.5762 DHC

Memory

32 GB

, DDR4-3200, 2 von 2 belegt, max. 64 GB

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Acer N7000, 2048 GB

, 1760 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 2 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5mm Klinke

Networking

Intel Ethernet Controller I226-V (10/2500MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 37 x 117 x 112

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Additional features

120-Watt-Netzteil, VESA-Mount, 36 Months Warranty

Weight

555 g, Power Supply: 260 g

Price

999 EUR

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Memory	Weight	Height
72.4 %	v8	08 / 2024	Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32768 MB	555 g	37 mm
80.8 %	v8	06 / 2024	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	653 g	60 mm
87.5 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	32768 MB	863 g	48.6 mm
83.4 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04 / 2024	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	32768 MB	768 g	57 mm
84.1 %	v8	04 / 2024	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32768 MB	545 g	37 mm
82.6 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	03 / 2024	Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	417 g	38 mm

注：我们已经更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。这里.

外壳 - 金属与塑料的完美结合

Geekom XT13 Pro 的外壳很熟悉，它曾用于 Geekom XT12 Pro。与英特尔 NUC 13 Pro 桌面版套件的相似之处也不容否认。基本上，外观没有任何问题。我们的测试样品再次完美完成，一切都配合得天衣无缝。尽管如此，我们还是希望看到一个新的外壳，使其与内部竞争产品略有不同。这款迷你电脑在桌面上仅占 11.7 x 11.2 厘米，是较为紧凑的设备之一。Geekom XT13 Pro 还可以使用附带的 VESA 支架直接连接到显示器上。

尺寸比较

设备 - 选购齐全，2 个 USB4

在外部接口方面，Geekom XT13 Pro 拥有与 Geekom XT12 Pro 相同的选项。虽然设备非常小巧，但连接方式却多种多样。背面的两个 USB-C 接口是现代的 USB4 接口，只要有合适的配件，就能大大扩展应用范围。总共可以同时操作四个屏幕，还有一个局域网连接。

交流

Geekom XT13 Pro 采用了知名的无线模块，Geekom 的许多设备都安装了该模块。联发科 Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 WLAN 模块在我们的测试设备中可以提供足够的性能。不过，如果可能，应主要使用 6 GHz 频率范围。另外，也可以使用电缆连接。数据传输速率最高可达 2.5 GBit/s。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1770 (1584^min - 1790^max) MBit/s +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1761 (1734^min - 1774^max) MBit/s +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1716 (1560^min - 1782^max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (684 - 1771, n=39)	1433 MBit/s -16%
Average of class Mini PC (684 - 1771, n=54, last 2 years)	1387 MBit/s -19%
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1375 (688^min - 1438^max) MBit/s -20%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1152 (576^min - 1273^max) MBit/s -33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1615 (767^min - 1670^max) MBit/s +12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1562 (1198^min - 1713^max) MBit/s +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1440 (1352^min - 1553^max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (394 - 1800, n=38)	1399 MBit/s -3%
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1367 (1268^min - 1443^max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Mini PC (394 - 1800, n=54, last 2 years)	1334 MBit/s -7%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1315 (691^min - 1352^max) MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1599 (802^min - 1683^max) MBit/s +65%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (707 - 1775, n=55)	1397 MBit/s +44%
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	969 (946^min - 981^max) MBit/s
Average of class Mini PC (320 - 1796, n=111, last 2 years)	941 MBit/s -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	892 (460^min - 921^max) MBit/s -8%
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	858 (827^min - 886^max) MBit/s -11%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	838 (728^min - 926^max) MBit/s -14%
Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	740 (676^min - 758^max) MBit/s -24%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1566 (904^min - 1695^max) MBit/s +94%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (358 - 1785, n=55)	1279 MBit/s +59%
Average of class Mini PC (184.1 - 1776, n=111, last 2 years)	868 MBit/s +8%
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	831 (755^min - 940^max) MBit/s +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	806 (765^min - 844^max) MBit/s
Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	736 (369^min - 756^max) MBit/s -9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	709 (369^min - 977^max) MBit/s -12%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	589 (295^min - 624^max) MBit/s -27%

Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1441 (1352-1553)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1562 (1198-1713)

Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1715 (1560-1782)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1760 (1734-1774)

Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø969 (946-981)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1572 (802-1683)

Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø806 (765-844)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1566 (904-1695)

配件

Geekom XT13 Pro 的交货范围符合常规标准。除设备本身外，包装盒内还包括 120 瓦电源装置和带安装材料的 VESA 支架。此外，还包括一根 HDMI 电缆和 Geekom 必备的感谢卡。

维护

Geekom XT13 Pro 很容易打开。只需拧松底部的四颗小螺丝，即可将底板固定到机箱的其他部分。底板上有一个固态硬盘散热器，因此在这一点上要更加小心。内存和大容量存储器都可以轻松访问。在我们的案例中，可以安装额外的固态硬盘。不过，这里必须遵守正确的标准，因为只兼容长度为 42 毫米的 SATA 固态硬盘。

可持续性

Geekom XT13 Pro 的包装盒比较大，有很多 "空气"。我们看到 Geekom 的做法与众不同。此外，所提供的标准配件被装在单独的塑料袋中，这在可持续性方面有待改进。设备本身主要由金属和塑料制成。不过，我们不知道在制造过程中是否使用了可回收材料。值得肯定的是，制造商提供 36 个月的保修服务。

性能 - 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H，14 个内核，20 个线程

Geekom XT13 Pro 的最高配置为英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H的顶级配置。此外，NUC PC 还可配备性能稍弱的英特尔酷睿 i7-13620H它也配备了 6P 内核，在性能方面与顶级机型相比应该只是略逊一筹。虽然快速的 NVMe 固态硬盘提供了坚实的基本配置，但 32 GB DDR4 内存始终包括在内。对于性能要求较高的应用来说，Geekom XT13 Pro 也并非不可逾越的任务。不过，iGPU 的 3D 性能是最大的软肋，但通过使用 eGPU 可以明显改善。

测试条件

在 Geekom XT13 Pro 的所有性能测试中，我们都使用了 "高性能 "能源配置文件。根据我们的测试标准，仅在功耗和噪音测量中存在偏差。测试标准.根据制造商的规格，Geekom 允许 SoC 以最低的功耗运行。用数字表示，这意味着连续负载下的功耗限制为 35 瓦，但允许短时间内达到 64 瓦。

处理器

英特尔英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H基于 Raptor Lake 架构，结合了 6P 和 8E 内核。从技术上讲，有英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H的基准测试结果与极客 XT12 Pro.不过，在细节方面，我们确实看到英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 略胜一筹，其多核性能略胜一筹，可以引起人们的注意。一个 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS或英特尔较新的流星湖系列机型。不过，与竞争对手稍快的机型相比，差距并不大。在日常使用中，由于差异较小，性能上不存在明显差异。

你可以在这里找到更多关于处理器的基准测试这里.

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	57.3 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	57 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	56.9 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	55.6 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	53.5 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	52.1 pt

Cinebench 2024
CPU Multi Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1067 Points +57%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1022 Points +50%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	933 Points +37%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	922 Points +36%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	680 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	578 Points -15%
CPU Single Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	110 Points +7%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	108 Points +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	108 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	107 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	106 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	103 Points

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18497 Points +54%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18016 Points +50%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	16130 Points +34%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	15556 Points +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11997 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	11036 Points -8%
Single Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1851 Points +8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1824 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1783 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1771 Points +3%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1747 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1719 Points

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	279 Points +14%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	278 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	268 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	258 Points +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	251 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	245 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2746 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2738 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2537 Points +4%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2470 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2448 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	2121 Points -13%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	715 Points +10%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	701 Points +8%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	692 Points +7%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	691 Points +6%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	679 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	649 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7196 Points +46%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7188 Points +46%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6346 Points +29%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6277 Points +27%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	4935 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	4294 Points -13%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3.34 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3.32 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3.27 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.13 Points +7%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	2.99 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2.93 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	33.95 Points +19%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33.49 Points +18%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	29.8 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	29.76 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	28.47 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	21.11 Points -26%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14374 Points +6%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	14300 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	14163 Points +5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13938 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	13515 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	13378 Points -1%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	95005 Points +24%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	88902 Points +16%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	85872 Points +12%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	84721 Points +11%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	76558 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	69621 Points -9%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	296 Seconds * -13%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	261 Seconds *
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	202 Seconds * +23%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	197 Seconds * +25%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	178 Seconds * +32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	171 Seconds * +34%

wPrime 2.10
32m
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	4.111 s * -17%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.523 s * -0%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	3.521 s *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3.254 s * +8%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2.703 s * +23%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2.648 s * +25%
1024m
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	441.275 s * -3%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	429.446 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	202.68 s * +53%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	139.617 s * +67%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	98.896 s * +77%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	98.222 s * +77%

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	335.5 (329^min - 340^max) fps +13%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	325 (323^min - 328^max) fps +9%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	297.5 (283^min - 313^max) fps
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	292.5 (291^min - 296^max) fps -2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	289 (286^min - 292^max) fps -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	262 (259^min - 282^max) fps -12%
Pass 2
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	158.2 (157.4^min - 158.8^max) fps +44%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	154.15 (153.8^min - 154.3^max) fps +40%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	143.7 (143^min - 145.2^max) fps +30%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	140.8 (138.2^min - 144.7^max) fps +28%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	110.15 (104.3^min - 134.9^max) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	92.2 (91^min - 114.5^max) fps -16%

WinRAR - Result
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7945 KB/s +25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7940 KB/s +25%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7723 KB/s +21%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7490 KB/s +18%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7327 KB/s +15%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	6365 KB/s

TrueCrypt
AES Mean 100MB
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	15.1 GB/s +14%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	14.4 GB/s +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	13.3 GB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11.3 GB/s -15%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	11.2 GB/s -16%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10.6 GB/s -20%
Twofish Mean 100MB
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2.3 GB/s
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2.1 GB/s -9%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2 GB/s -13%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1.9 GB/s -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1.8 GB/s -22%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1.7 GB/s -26%
Serpent Mean 100MB
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1.3 GB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1.3 GB/s 0%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1.3 GB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1.1 GB/s -15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1.1 GB/s -15%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1 GB/s -23%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13392 Points +16%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12662 Points +10%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12261 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12143 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11536 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	10028 Points -13%
Single-Core
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2008 Points +18%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1958 Points +15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1856 Points +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1790 Points +5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1746 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1708 Points

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13228 Points +15%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12438 Points +8%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12127 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12086 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11464 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	9892 Points -14%
5.0 Single-Core
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1918 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1900 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1821 Points +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1710 Points +2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1708 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1678 Points

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	8253 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8034 Points +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7635 Points +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7602 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	7389 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6927 Points -6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	48723 Points +14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	47960 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47777 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45250 Points +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	42713 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	37359 Points -13%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	22600 Points +25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	21875 Points +21%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	21762 Points +20%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	20846 Points +15%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	18126 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	16634 Points -8%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	71934 MIPS +28%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	70733 MIPS +26%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70707 MIPS +26%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66438 MIPS +18%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	56068 MIPS
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	47146 MIPS -16%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6744 MIPS +16%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6644 MIPS +14%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	5881 MIPS +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	5828 MIPS
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5560 MIPS -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5485 MIPS -6%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	20.9 fps +42%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20.6 fps +40%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	20.5 fps +39%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.6 fps +33%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	14.7 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	12.3 fps -16%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4693 sec *
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4652 sec * +1%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4632 sec * +1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	0.4627 sec * +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4392 sec * +6%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4351 sec * +7%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	54.8 s * -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	49.5 s * -6%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47.5 s * -1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	46.8 s *
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.5 s * +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	39.6 s * +15%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	333 Points +23%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	300 Points +11%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	291 Points +7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	276 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	271 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	264 Points -3%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	550 ms *
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	535 ms * +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	532 ms * +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	517 ms * +6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	511 ms * +7%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	503 ms * +9%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	26194 Points +11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	26038 Points +10%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	25816 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	25043 Points +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	23640 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	22242 Points -6%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11481 Points +18%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	10824 Points +11%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	10397 Points +7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10014 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	9741 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7985 Points -18%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	7.512 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7.454 s * +1%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7.442 s * +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7.331 s * +2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7.168 s * +5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6.751 s * +10%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	18.402 s * -12%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	18.138 s * -10%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	16.436 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	16.424 s * -0%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.125 s * +2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14.879 s * +9%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	665.289 s * -57%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	529.929 s * -25%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	424.723 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	396.475 s * +7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	394.754 s * +7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	304.446 s * +28%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

9326

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

14274 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

76558 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

13515 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

13392

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

53904

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

2.59 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

23.48 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

91.64 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.93 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

28.47 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

90.43 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

245 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2448 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

104 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

649 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

4935 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

11997 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1719 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

103 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

680 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	96.2 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	92.2 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	82.4 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	78.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58 pt
Average of class Mini PC	57.4 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	52.2 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	25916 KRay/s +120%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	25359 KRay/s +115%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	17544 KRay/s +49%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	17312 KRay/s +47%
Average of class Mini PC (646 - 51004, n=117, last 2 years)	12754 KRay/s +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	11780 KRay/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	10476 KRay/s -11%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	109747 Points +84%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	107540 Points +80%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	91112 Points +52%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	88829 Points +49%
Average of class Mini PC (3857 - 214250, n=117, last 2 years)	64155 Points +7%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59787 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	54166 Points -9%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	4753 MB/s +69%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	4695 MB/s +67%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	4343 MB/s +54%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	4246 MB/s +51%
Average of class Mini PC (260 - 9399, n=117, last 2 years)	2829 MB/s +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2813 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2504 MB/s -11%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	118174 Points +29%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	116083 Points +26%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	91925 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89748 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	87291 Points -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	82291 Points -10%
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=117, last 2 years)	79428 Points -14%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	14876 Points +82%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	14663 Points +79%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	10759 Points +32%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10247 Points +25%
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=117, last 2 years)	8724 Points +7%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8181 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7317 Points -11%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	58597 Points +99%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	57402 Points +95%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	45718 Points +55%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	44874 Points +53%
Average of class Mini PC (1987 - 113499, n=117, last 2 years)	33471 Points +14%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	29407 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	26850 Points -9%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	164414 MB/s +55%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	154066 MB/s +46%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	144741 MB/s +37%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	105740 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	95500 MB/s -10%
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=117, last 2 years)	87791 MB/s -17%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	85572 MB/s -19%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	1233 MB/s +51%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1183 MB/s +44%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1048 MB/s +28%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	1020 MB/s +25%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	819 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	745 MB/s -9%
Average of class Mini PC (74.9 - 2039, n=117, last 2 years)	732 MB/s -11%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13875 KRay/s +122%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	13517 KRay/s +117%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9284 KRay/s +49%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	9270 KRay/s +49%
Average of class Mini PC (350 - 26952, n=117, last 2 years)	6821 KRay/s +9%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6242 KRay/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5777 KRay/s -7%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	45560 MPixel/s +61%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	40570 MPixel/s +43%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	40245 MPixel/s +42%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	33092 MPixel/s +17%
Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=117, last 2 years)	28317 MPixel/s 0%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	28315 MPixel/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	24858 MPixel/s -12%

Cinebench R15 多回路

我们测试样本的 Cinebench R15 连续循环几乎与 Geekom XT12 Pro 并行。不过，较新的 XT13 Pro 最终还是以明显的优势领先。此外，我们还发现，小型散热系统无法长时间维持 SoC 的 Turbo。64 瓦的最大功率限制只能在很短的时间内达到，因为由于温度过高，功耗不得不降低。

Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø1851 (1675.95-2471.58)

Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2530 (2503.13-2552.81)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2784 (2721.64-2831.86)

Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2759 (2690.7-2800.92)

Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1545 (1395.97-2133.22)

Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2410 (2285.58-2581.81)

系统性能

在系统性能测试中，Geekom XT13 Pro 的记录性能仅够排名垫底。不过，主观而言，我们可以说 Geekom XT13 Pro 的性能还算不错。在测试阶段，我们在使用该设备时没有发现任何明显的延迟现象。说到内存的选择，从 AIDA64 基准测试中可以看出，速度较慢的 DDR4 标准遭到了报复。从技术上讲英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H可以与 DDR5（5200MT/s）结合使用。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity

PCMark 10 / Score
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	7510 Points +23%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	7455 Points +22%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	7431 Points +22%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	7120 Points +17%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	6295 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	6102 Points

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	11273 Points +3%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	11125 Points +2%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	11114 Points +2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	11030 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	10908 Points
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10822 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	10484 Points +40%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10482 Points +40%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	10291 Points +37%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	8901 Points +19%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	8114 Points +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	7490 Points

CrossMark: Overall | Responsiveness | Creativity | Productivity

CrossMark / Overall
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1939 Points +6%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1861 Points +1%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1860 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1837 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1802 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1675 Points -9%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1931 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1919 Points -1%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1849 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1700 Points -12%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1540 Points -20%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1378 Points -29%

CrossMark / Creativity
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	2072 Points +10%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2040 Points +8%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1929 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1889 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1883 Points 0%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1870 Points -1%

CrossMark / Productivity
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1872 Points +7%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1831 Points +4%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1781 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1756 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1717 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1589 Points -10%

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	71990 MB/s +54%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	67777 MB/s +45%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	67161 MB/s +44%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	62397 MB/s +34%
Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 89287, n=117, last 2 years)	48397 MB/s +4%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	46670 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	45792 MB/s -2%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	75449 MB/s +64%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	64323 MB/s +40%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	61542 MB/s +34%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	61006 MB/s +33%
Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 99171, n=117, last 2 years)	49208 MB/s +7%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	48963 MB/s +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	45998 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	86810 MB/s +84%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	86677 MB/s +83%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	70596 MB/s +49%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	65057 MB/s +38%
Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 98583, n=117, last 2 years)	52965 MB/s +12%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47241 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47201 MB/s 0%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	149 ns * -80%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	146.1 ns * -76%
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=117, last 2 years)	92.3 ns * -11%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	89 ns * -7%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	88.6 ns * -7%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	83 ns *
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	74.7 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在 Geekom XT13 Pro 上，我们没有看到过长的 DPC 延迟。在 Geekom XT12 Pro.尽管如此，我们的测试样本远未达到出色的结果。即使只是使用 Edge 浏览器冲浪，我们也达到了最大值。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2724 μs * -63%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2151 μs * -29%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2069.2 μs * -24%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	1671.7 μs *
Geekom A7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000	1616.1 μs * +3%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1001.9 μs * +40%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

Geekom XT13 Pro 配备了宏碁 2 TB 存储空间的固态硬盘。同样的型号已经在 Geekom GT13在所有测试中都表现出色。技术连接是最佳的，因此传输速率非常高。在连续负载的情况下，宏碁 N7000 在保持读取性能稳定方面略有问题。幸运的是，并没有出现极端不利的情况。从图中可以看出，宏碁 N7000 在读取性能降低的情况下，性能仍然明显优于 Geekom XT12 Pro或 Acemagic F2A.在对 Geekom XT12 Pro 的测试中，我们发现了散热垫位置的问题，而 Geekom XT13 Pro 的情况并非如此。散热垫的位置是正确的。正如我们在维护部分提到的，Geekom XT13 Pro 可以安装额外的固态硬盘。不过，第二个 M.2 插槽仅支持长度为 42 毫米（M.2-2242）的 SATA 固态硬盘。

如需进一步比较和基准测试，请参阅我们的比较表.

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Acer N7000

Sequential Read: 3706 MB/s

Sequential Write: 4324 MB/s

512K Read: 2122 MB/s

512K Write: 3620 MB/s

4K Read: 73.35 MB/s

4K Write: 330.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 1038 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 770 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	88.9 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	82.1 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	65.8 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	58.2 pt
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	54.8 pt
Average of class Mini PC	47.7 pt
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	45.6 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	3755 (3733.85^min - 3754.99^max) MB/s +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	3690 (2901.41^min - 3690.32^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3108 (3065.99^min - 3107.56^max) MB/s -16%
Average of class Mini PC (277 - 4357, n=117, last 2 years)	2326 MB/s -37%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2315 (2293.84^min - 2315.26^max) MB/s -37%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2178 (2158.39^min - 2177.68^max) MB/s -41%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1674 (1242.56^min - 1673.54^max) MB/s -55%
seq write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4619 (4584.79^min - 4619.39^max) MB/s +10%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	4196 (3895.46^min - 4196.19^max) MB/s
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	3492 (3398.43^min - 3491.76^max) MB/s -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3386 (3076.94^min - 3385.64^max) MB/s -19%
Average of class Mini PC (229 - 5595, n=117, last 2 years)	2492 MB/s -41%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2341 (2252.02^min - 2341.4^max) MB/s -44%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1348 (1117.85^min - 1347.87^max) MB/s -68%
seq q8 t1 read
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	6932 (5986.51^min - 6931.53^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	5213 (4500.71^min - 5212.95^max) MB/s -25%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	4861 (4468.61^min - 4860.57^max) MB/s -30%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	4769 (3791.02^min - 4769.24^max) MB/s -31%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4676 (4310.07^min - 4675.81^max) MB/s -33%
Average of class Mini PC (236 - 8430, n=117, last 2 years)	3772 MB/s -46%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3194 (2810.81^min - 3194.17^max) MB/s -54%
seq q8 t1 write
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	5793 (5555.78^min - 5793.38^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4754 (4738.27^min - 4754.03^max) MB/s -18%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	4695 (4470.16^min - 4694.73^max) MB/s -19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3729 (3700.15^min - 3728.95^max) MB/s -36%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	3255 (2485.13^min - 3254.57^max) MB/s -44%
Average of class Mini PC (239 - 6669, n=117, last 2 years)	2793 MB/s -52%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2212 (1222.43^min - 2212.27^max) MB/s -62%
4k q1 t1 read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	78.7 (78.09^min - 78.69^max) MB/s +12%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	70.3 (66.06^min - 70.34^max) MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	64.1 (56.32^min - 64.06^max) MB/s -9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	63.5 (59.81^min - 63.5^max) MB/s -10%
Average of class Mini PC (6.85 - 86.6, n=117, last 2 years)	55 MB/s -22%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	52.3 (51.85^min - 52.27^max) MB/s -26%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	47.3 (47.07^min - 47.31^max) MB/s -33%
4k q1 t1 write
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	335 (332.49^min - 335.43^max) MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	279 (237.61^min - 279.08^max) MB/s -17%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	274 (271.38^min - 273.89^max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Mini PC (30.4 - 435, n=117, last 2 years)	196.5 MB/s -41%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	187.2 (181.54^min - 187.2^max) MB/s -44%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	184.4 (177.6^min - 184.36^max) MB/s -45%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	165.9 (164.35^min - 165.92^max) MB/s -50%
4k q32 t16 read
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	4158 (4048.89^min - 4158.05^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3197 (3174.44^min - 3196.85^max) MB/s -23%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1824 (1239.47^min - 1824.09^max) MB/s -56%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	1560 (1546.89^min - 1559.94^max) MB/s -62%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1452 (1402.67^min - 1451.9^max) MB/s -65%
Average of class Mini PC (26.1 - 4158, n=117, last 2 years)	1389 MB/s -67%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1143 (1091.01^min - 1142.98^max) MB/s -73%
4k q32 t16 write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3639 (3534.46^min - 3639.09^max) MB/s +16%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	3142 (2751.87^min - 3141.57^max) MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1499 (1114.25^min - 1499.4^max) MB/s -52%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1434 (1410.26^min - 1433.71^max) MB/s -54%
Average of class Mini PC (32.6 - 4288, n=117, last 2 years)	1319 MB/s -58%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	595 (582.97^min - 594.71^max) MB/s -81%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	497 (467.49^min - 497.28^max) MB/s -84%

AS SSD
Score Total
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10021 Points +50%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	6667 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	5975 Points -10%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	5177 Points -22%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4987 Points -25%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	4412 Points -34%
Average of class Mini PC (211 - 10021, n=115, last 2 years)	4218 Points -37%
Score Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3741 Points +42%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	2635 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2119 Points -20%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	1685 Points -36%
Average of class Mini PC (76 - 3741, n=115, last 2 years)	1567 Points -41%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1561 Points -41%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1482 Points -44%
Score Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4371 Points +59%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2807 Points +2%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2777 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	2741 Points
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	2676 Points -2%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2082 Points -24%
Average of class Mini PC (88 - 4371, n=115, last 2 years)	1893 Points -31%
Seq Read
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	4882 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	4349.85 MB/s -11%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4317 MB/s -12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3779 MB/s -23%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	3650 MB/s -25%
Average of class Mini PC (291 - 6620, n=115, last 2 years)	3216 MB/s -34%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3010 MB/s -38%
Seq Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4188 MB/s +19%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	3936.64 MB/s +12%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	3506 MB/s
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	2611 MB/s -26%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2369 MB/s -32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2285 MB/s -35%
Average of class Mini PC (242 - 5783, n=115, last 2 years)	2271 MB/s -35%
4K Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	89.3 MB/s +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	84.3 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	80.89 MB/s -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	63.3 MB/s -25%
Average of class Mini PC (21.4 - 104.3, n=115, last 2 years)	59.6 MB/s -29%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	49.7 MB/s -41%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	41.8 MB/s -50%
4K Write
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	316.33 MB/s +9%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	291 MB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	238 MB/s -18%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	221 MB/s -24%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	196.9 MB/s -32%
Average of class Mini PC (30.9 - 366, n=115, last 2 years)	177.2 MB/s -39%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	160 MB/s -45%
4K-64 Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3220 MB/s +56%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	2062 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1602.91 MB/s -22%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	1270 MB/s -38%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1218 MB/s -41%
Average of class Mini PC (23.4 - 3220, n=115, last 2 years)	1185 MB/s -43%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1041 MB/s -50%
4K-64 Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3731 MB/s +78%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2340 MB/s +11%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	2255 MB/s +7%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	2100 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2066.57 MB/s -2%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1649 MB/s -21%
Average of class Mini PC (32.8 - 3731, n=115, last 2 years)	1489 MB/s -29%
Access Time Read
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	0.138 ms * -100%
Average of class Mini PC (0.022 - 0.489, n=115, last 2 years)	0.09625 ms * -39%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.076 ms * -10%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	0.069 ms *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.067 ms * +3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	0.049 ms * +29%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.046 ms * +33%
Access Time Write
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.126 ms * -125%
Average of class Mini PC (0.014 - 0.765, n=115, last 2 years)	0.111 ms * -98%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	0.072 ms * -29%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	0.059 ms * -5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	0.056 ms *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.02 ms * +64%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.017 ms * +70%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5637 (4899.21-6932.56)

Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5121 (4152.57-5218.34)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4683 (3872.18-4767.25)

Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1320 (771.89-3141.95)

Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1764 (1425.22-4795.56)

Geekom A7 Acer N5000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4848 (4561.2-4857.36)

图形

英特尔英特尔 Iris Xe 图形处理器 G7处理 3D 计算并负责图像输出。英特尔英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H是该系列中速度最快的机型。不过，这款过时的机型很难与现代的代表机型相抗衡。如果 Geekom 敢于在 XT13 Pro 中安装流星湖 SoC，那么 3D 性能的提升将是显而易见的。英特尔 Arc 8 核 iGPU 的性能完全可以从对比数据中看出来。同时，如果在系统中安装 AMD Radeon 780M，3D 性能会更高。目前，Geekom 自身也提供了多款配备该 iGPU 的设备，这意味着该制造商在这一领域的日子不好过。其中一个例子是 Geekom A7和 Geekom A8或 Geekom AE7.

更多比较和基准测试可参见我们的 GPU 对照表.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	97.5 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	93.5 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	92.9 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	91.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	58.5 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	54.7 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	13932 Points +88%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13410 Points +81%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12085 Points +63%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11691 Points +57%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	7428 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	6975 Points -6%

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3205 Points +91%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3193 Points +90%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2968 Points +76%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2846 Points +69%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1682 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1581 Points -6%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	8391 Points +44%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8007 Points +37%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7710 Points +32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7599 Points +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	5845 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	5421 Points -7%

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	34.6 fps +39%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	31.6 fps +27%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	29.7 fps +19%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	26 fps +4%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	24.9 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	21.8 fps -12%
Extreme Preset DX11
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	36.3 fps +41%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	33.2 fps +29%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32.7 fps +27%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	32 fps +25%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	25.7 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	22.7 fps -12%

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	24.5 fps +61%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18.5 fps +22%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	17.7 fps +16%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.1 fps +13%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	15.2 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	13.3 fps -12%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	32.4 fps +108%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	21 fps +35%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18.3 fps +17%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	15.6 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	13.9 fps -11%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12.2 fps -22%

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12174 Points +84%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10491 Points +59%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	10102 Points +53%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9725 Points +47%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	6603 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	5950 Points -10%
1920x1080 1080p High
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3592 Points +59%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3391 Points +50%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3341 Points +48%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3129 Points +39%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	2254 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	2035 Points -10%
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1920 Points +70%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1812 Points +61%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1737 Points +54%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1577 Points +40%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1128 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1042 Points -8%

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9796 Points +171%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	9494 Points +163%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7480 Points +107%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6270 Points +73%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	3616 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	3390 Points -6%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	483 Points +67%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	479 Points +65%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	469 Points +62%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	427 Points +47%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	290 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	231 Points -20%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	484 Points +69%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	481 Points +68%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	462 Points +62%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	422 Points +48%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	286 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	246 Points -14%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2574 Points +202%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2477 Points +191%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1961 Points +130%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1620 Points +90%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	860 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	851 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2608 Points +201%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2519 Points +191%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1594 Points +84%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1274 Points +47%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	872 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	866 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3650 Points +176%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3535 Points +167%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3076 Points +133%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2444 Points +85%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1323 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1182 Points -11%

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	817 Samples/s +30%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	801 Samples/s +28%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	640 Samples/s +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	627 Samples/s
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	549 Samples/s -12%
Sala GPUs-only
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2732 Samples/s +39%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2319 Samples/s +18%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1970 Samples/s
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1522 Samples/s -23%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1496 Samples/s -24%

Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5308 Points +23%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	4928 Points +14%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	4332 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	3830 Points -12%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1709 Points -61%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1396 Points -68%

	Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H	Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M R7 8845HS	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H	Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H	Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H	Geekom A7, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS	Average of class Mini PC
SPECviewperf 2020		309%	36%	25%	-4%	278%	192%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)	3.63	11.2 209%	4.23 17%	5.05 39%	3.49 -4%	11.1 206%	7.85 ?(0.78 - 30.8, n=66, last 2 years) 116%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)	3.15	19.9 532%	6.03 91%	4.61 46%	3.05 -3%	14.1 348%	11.3 ?(0.52 - 47.9, n=66, last 2 years) 259%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)	16	33.4 109%	18.5 16%	17.9 12%	14.8 -7%	31.4 96%	30.7 ?(7.73 - 97.5, n=66, last 2 years) 92%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)	7.9	23.2 194%	11.1 41%	10 27%	7.78 -2%	24.8 214%	18.6 ?(4.61 - 64.1, n=65, last 2 years) 135%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)	10.3	20.4 98%	14.9 45%	12.9 25%	9.69 -6%	20.9 103%	22.5 ?(5.53 - 87.5, n=66, last 2 years) 118%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)	6.13	64.1 946%	6.24 2%	5.7 -7%	6.29 3%	61.4 902%	37.2 ?(2.25 - 224, n=64, last 2 years) 507%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)	26.8	47.7 78%	37.7 41%	35.4 32%	23.9 -11%	47 75%	58.9 ?(12.2 - 223, n=66, last 2 years) 120%

3DMark 05 Standard		29045 points
3DMark 06 Score 1366x768		30156 points
3DMark Vantage P Result		28599 points
3DMark 11 Performance		8024 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		155640 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		28112 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5448 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		2570 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1920 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		183 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		1276 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

英特尔 Iris Xe iGPU 无法应对大多数游戏。老化的 iGPU 只能在低分辨率和中低图形预设下实现足够的帧率。如果你还想用 Geekom XT13 Pro 玩游戏，就必须绕道使用外置显卡。有多种型号的显卡可通过 USB4 与设备一起使用。

Dota 2 Reborn | GTA V | Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | F1 24

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Geekom A7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000	155.8 (135.9^min) fps +33%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	152.7 (134.2^min) fps +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	117.2 (74.5^min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	106.5 (61^min) fps -9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	106.3 (81.7^min) fps -9%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	103.2 (59.8^min) fps -12%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Geekom A7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000	87.6 (75^min) fps +21%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	86.6 (72.2^min) fps +19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	79 (48.2^min) fps +9%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	77.3 (52.5^min) fps +7%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	72.5 (53^min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	61.3 (54.1^min) fps -15%

GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Geekom A7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000	167.5 (5.17^min, 125^P1) fps +36%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	165.1 (4.83^min, 125^P1) fps +34%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	163.6 (4.63^min, 111.1^P1) fps +32%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	161 (4.76^min, 100^P1) fps +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	123.5 (30.5^min, 66.7^P1) fps
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Geekom A7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000	66.6 (4.46^min, 37^P1) fps +201%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	65.3 (4.57^min, 45.5^P1) fps +195%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	41.2 (3.12^min, 30.3^P1) fps +86%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	31.3 (2.94^min, 22.7^P1) fps +42%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	22.1 (7.08^min, 16.4^P1) fps

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	42.4 (35.7^min) fps +128%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	34.3 (29.1^min) fps +84%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	29.5 (24.1^min) fps +59%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	18.6 (15.4^min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	16.4 (13.6^min) fps -12%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	26.3 (22.2^min) fps +102%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	24 (20.6^min) fps +85%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	20.4 (13.8^min) fps +57%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	13 (11^min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	11.5 (10^min) fps -12%

Baldur's Gate 3
1280x720 Low Preset
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	60.3 (21.3^min, 36^P0.1, 46.1^P1) fps +114%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	28.2 (13.8^min, 15.1^P0.1, 19.8^P1) fps
1920x1080 High Preset
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	24.7 (16.6^min, 17.1^P0.1, 19.4^P1) fps +83%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	13.5 (11.2^min, 11.2^P0.1, 11.6^P1) fps

F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	43.1 (36^min, 26^P1) fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	26.7 (23^min, 17^P1) fps

FPS chart

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø11.2 (9.21-12.9)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.7 (20.1-23.3)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	123.5	105.9	22.1	9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	117.2	82.9	72.5	66.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	46	25.7	18.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	19.9	15.4	13.5	13
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	18.6	15	13	11.4
F1 24 (2024)	43.1	37.3	26.7

使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 进行 Geekom XT13 Pro 性能测试

Geekom XT13 Pro 有两个 USB4 端口，支持使用外置显卡。在不影响整体效果的前提下，我们使用 Razer Core X 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 进行了一些测试。与英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 老化的 iGPU 相比，3D 性能大幅提升。与其他测试设备相比，合成测试的结果几乎完全相同。从测试的游戏中可以看出，这种组合也能显著提高游戏性能。有时，即使是最现代的游戏也能享受到完整的细节。

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	99 pt
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	99 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	98 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	96.2 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	95.2 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	94.8 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	34666 Points +367%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	34034 Points +358%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	33454 Points +350%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	33219 Points +347%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	32654 Points +340%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	32085 Points +332%
	7428 Points

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	11182 Points +565%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	11156 Points +563%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	11118 Points +561%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	11085 Points +559%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	11062 Points +558%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10935 Points +550%
	1682 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	25842 Points +342%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	25468 Points +336%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	25462 Points +336%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	25415 Points +335%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	24809 Points +324%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	24796 Points +324%
	5845 Points
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	7139 Points +468%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7079 Points +464%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	7047 Points +461%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	7046 Points +461%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7044 Points +461%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	6997 Points +457%
	1256 Points

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	34726 Points +426%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	34168 Points +417%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	33894 Points +413%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	31986 Points +384%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	31903 Points +383%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	25121 Points +280%
	6603 Points
1920x1080 1080p High
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	15240 Points +576%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	15076 Points +569%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	15008 Points +566%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	14959 Points +564%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	14859 Points +559%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	14853 Points +559%
	2254 Points
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	7193 Points +538%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	7098 Points +529%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	7089 Points +528%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	7064 Points +526%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7055 Points +525%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7029 Points +523%
	1128 Points
3840x2160 4k Optimized
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	9419 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	9315 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	9240 Points
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	9205 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	9188 Points
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9149 Points
7680x4320 8k Optimized
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	4079 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	4061 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	4042 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	4016 Points
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	4013 Points
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	4009 Points

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	144.5 fps +851%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	143.9 fps +847%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	142.2 fps +836%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	141.6 fps +832%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	140.6 fps +825%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	135.9 fps +794%
	15.2 fps
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	138.6 fps +788%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	138.2 fps +786%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	137.6 fps +782%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	137.5 fps +781%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	137 fps +778%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	133.5 fps +756%
	15.6 fps

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	174.9 fps +602%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	174.5 fps +601%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	173.6 fps +597%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	173.5 fps +597%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	172.3 fps +592%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	172.1 fps +591%
	24.9 fps
Extreme Preset DX11
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	164.2 fps +539%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	163.6 fps +537%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	163.2 fps +535%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	162.5 fps +532%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	162 fps +530%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	158.8 fps +518%
	25.7 fps

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	28156 Points +679%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	28076 Points +676%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	27929 Points +672%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	27843 Points +670%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	27669 Points +665%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	25975 Points +618%
	3616 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	2719 Points +838%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2715 Points +836%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2708 Points +834%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2687 Points +827%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	2681 Points +824%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	2527 Points +771%
	290 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	2663 Points +831%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2657 Points +829%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2641 Points +823%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2622 Points +817%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	2614 Points +814%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	2463 Points +761%
	286 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	5769 Points +578%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	5760 Points +577%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	5742 Points +575%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	5726 Points +573%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5652 Points +564%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	5342 Points +528%
	851 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	6335 Points +632%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6319 Points +630%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6283 Points +626%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	6275 Points +625%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	6223 Points +619%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	5881 Points +579%
	866 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	10671 Points +707%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	10626 Points +703%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	10594 Points +701%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	10548 Points +697%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10445 Points +689%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	9762 Points +638%
	1323 Points

Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	100.6 Points +32%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	98.3 Points +28%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	93.7 Points +22%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	81.6 Points +7%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	81.2 Points +6%
	76.5 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	66.3 Points -13%

Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	55.8 Points +598%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	55.8 Points +598%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	48 Points +500%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	47.9 Points +499%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	47.3 Points +491%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	45.6 Points +470%
	8 Points

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | F1 24

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	106 (82.3^min) fps +233%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	101.4 (78.7^min) fps +219%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	88.7 (68^min) fps +179%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	84.9 (65.5^min) fps +167%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	79.5 (59.3^min) fps +150%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	70.2 (53.5^min) fps +121%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	31.8 (24.6^min) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	81.5 (64.7^min) fps +443%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	81.4 (65.1^min) fps +443%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	81.2 (65.1^min) fps +441%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	80.4 (63.9^min) fps +436%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	78.9 (63^min) fps +426%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	72.2 (55.8^min) fps +381%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	15 (12.4^min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	64.5 (50.7^min) fps +466%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	64.4 (49.9^min) fps +465%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	63.9 (49.4^min) fps +461%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	63.5 (50.1^min) fps +457%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	63.3 (47.6^min) fps +455%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	60.8 (43.6^min) fps +433%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	11.4 (9.68^min) fps

Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Low Preset
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	113.4 (62.4^min, 69.4^P0.1, 78.1^P1) fps +470%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	113.3 (60^min, 68.1^P0.1, 78.5^P1) fps +469%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	113 (47.4^min, 65.4^P0.1, 77.5^P1) fps +468%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	110.4 (37.6^min, 67.1^P0.1, 77.2^P1) fps +455%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	110.1 (57.6^min, 68.5^P0.1, 75.3^P1) fps +453%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	109.5 (51.8^min, 62.3^P0.1, 74.4^P1) fps +450%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	19.9 (15.5^min, 15.6^P0.1, 16.4^P1) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	91.3 (51.4^min, 53.4^P0.1, 61.1^P1) fps +493%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	90.8 (48.5^min, 55.2^P0.1, 61.7^P1) fps +490%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	90.4 (50.6^min, 54.8^P0.1, 59.8^P1) fps +487%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	90.1 (50.2^min, 55.2^P0.1, 61.6^P1) fps +485%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	88.5 (53.2^min, 55.5^P0.1, 59.9^P1) fps +475%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	87.3 (36.9^min, 43.6^P0.1, 57.2^P1) fps +467%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	15.4 (11.8^min, 11.9^P0.1, 12.7^P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	79 (45.4^min, 46^P0.1, 53.2^P1) fps +508%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	78.5 (46.2^min, 47^P0.1, 53.1^P1) fps +504%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	78.3 (46.6^min, 47.4^P0.1, 51.3^P1) fps +502%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	78.2 (40.1^min, 46.3^P0.1, 52.6^P1) fps +502%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	76.8 (44.1^min, 46.7^P0.1, 49.8^P1) fps +491%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	76.3 (41.3^min, 43.7^P0.1, 50^P1) fps +487%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	13 (10.1^min, 10.1^P0.1, 11^P1) fps

F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	88.2 (48^min, 52^P1) fps +105%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	88.1 (48^min, 49^P1) fps +104%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	77.3 (42^min, 43^P1) fps +79%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	76.9 (42^min, 44^P1) fps +78%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	75 (42^min, 43^P1) fps +74%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	72.6 (41^min, 43^P1) fps +68%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	43.1 (36^min, 26^P1) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	84.5 (47^min, 49^P1) fps +127%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	82.2 (47^min, 49^P1) fps +120%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	74.1 (42^min, 43^P1) fps +99%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	73.1 (42^min, 43^P1) fps +96%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	72.8 (41^min, 41^P1) fps +95%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	70 (41^min, 42^P1) fps +88%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	37.3 (32^min, 26^P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	46.4 (27^min, 26^P1) fps
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	46.1 (27^min, 27^P1) fps
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	42.2 (24^min, 25^P1) fps
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	42 (24^min, 25^P1) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	41.8 (24^min, 24^P1) fps
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	39.5 (22^min, 23^P1) fps

	Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H	Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-13900H	Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-13900H	Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-12900H	Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), Ultra 5 125H	Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), R9 7940HS	Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), R9 8945HS	Average of class Mini PC
SPECviewperf 2020		391%	387%	321%	182%	395%	516%	192%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)	3.63	13 258%	10.8 198%	11.8 225%	10.9 200%	13 258%	10.8 198%	7.85 ?(0.78 - 30.8, n=66, last 2 years) 116%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)	3.15	20.9 563%	21 567%	18.9 500%	17.8 465%	20.9 563%	50.3 1497%	11.3 ?(0.52 - 47.9, n=66, last 2 years) 259%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)	16	74.2 364%	76.4 378%	62.7 292%	26.6 66%	76.8 380%	76.6 379%	30.7 ?(7.73 - 97.5, n=66, last 2 years) 92%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)	7.9	39.4 399%	40.1 408%	32.8 315%	23.6 199%	39.2 396%	38.8 391%	18.6 ?(4.61 - 64.1, n=65, last 2 years) 135%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)	10.3	47.2 358%	47.3 359%	40 288%	28.7 179%	46.5 351%	45.9 346%	22.5 ?(5.53 - 87.5, n=66, last 2 years) 118%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)	6.13	16.5 169%	16.5 169%	15.2 148%	11.4 86%	16.6 171%	16.6 171%	37.2 ?(2.25 - 224, n=64, last 2 years) 507%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)	26.8	194 624%	196 631%	155 478%	47.5 77%	199 643%	195 628%	58.9 ?(12.2 - 223, n=66, last 2 years) 120%

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	182.2	178.4	170.3	104.2	92.7	103.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	165.8	138.3	132	121.9		104.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	183.7	142.2	98.8		77.6	48.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	146.4	137.9	106.3			92.1
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	113	91.3	79	78.5	61.6	37.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	88.2	81.4	71.7	64.4	44.5	22.2
F1 24 (2024)	76.9	73.1	60.5	42.2	36.9	19.2

排放 - 冷却能力弱，耗电量低

噪音排放

即使是相同设计的设备，在噪音排放方面也无法给人留下深刻印象。Geekom XT13 Pro 也是如此，至少在负载情况下是如此。微型电脑在空闲时非常安静，几乎听不到噪音。不过，风扇始终在运转，这意味着半被动运行是不可能的。在负载情况下，风扇偶尔会大幅转动，我们测得的峰值声压级为 49.5 dB(A)。不过，最大音量并不总是存在。在压力测试中，风扇转速反复波动，因此 Geekom XT13 Pro 在负载情况下仅达到 38 dB(A)。我们在平均负载下也观察到了同样的现象。在这里，可测量音量在 38 到 42.2 dB(A) 之间波动。
。

遗憾的是，Geekom XT12 Pro 并不是最安静的设备之一。只有在空转时，设备才能几乎无声地工作，只能听到风扇发出的轻微噪音。但在负载情况下，这种情况就会发生变化，因为微型电脑的噪音可明显达到 44.2 dB(A)。在游戏过程中，我们甚至能测出高达 47.2 分贝（A）的噪音。不过，我们无法在游戏过程中检测到持续的高声压级。测试结果在 39 和 47.2 dB(A) 之间波动。

Noise Level

Idle		27.6 / 27.8 / 27.9 dB(A)
Load		42.2 / 49.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
Noise		10%	1%	2%	2%	-9%
off / environment *	25	24.3 3%	24.1 4%	24.9 -0%	25.4 -2%	25.4 -2%
Idle Minimum *	27.6	27.5 -0%	29.8 -8%	25.4 8%	28 -1%	33.3 -21%
Idle Average *	27.8	27.6 1%	29.9 -8%	25.7 8%	28.1 -1%	33.6 -21%
Idle Maximum *	27.9	27.6 1%	30 -8%	25.7 8%	28.5 -2%	33.7 -21%
Load Average *	42.2	36 15%	37.3 12%	47.8 -13%	39.6 6%	43.3 -3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	46.6	35.4 24%
Load Maximum *	49.5	38.2 23%	43.5 12%	49 1%	44.2 11%	43.3 13%
Witcher 3 ultra *		35.4	40.2	45.23	47.2	43.2

* ... smaller is better

温度

在负载情况下，外壳会明显发热。不过，我们找不到任何临界值。SoC 看起来有些不同，因为 Geekom 没有限制最高温度，在负载情况下温度很快就达到了 100 °C。与 Cinebench R15 多环测试不同，英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 在压力测试中没有超过 64 瓦限制。SoC 发热过快，性能不得不降低。经过较长时间后，温度稳定在 90°C 左右，这对处理器来说不成问题。由于设计极为紧凑，因此无法安装更强大的冷却系统。

Max. Load

Idle


43.4 °C	45.7 °C	45.1 °C
35.7 °C	42 °C	40.9 °C
32 °C	37.3 °C	32.9 °C

Maximum: 45.7 °C
Average: 39.4 °C


40 °C	40.1 °C	40.3 °C
34.2 °C	37.8 °C	35.8 °C
34.7 °C	35.4 °C	32.1 °C

Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 36.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.

耗电量

与竞争对手相比，Geekom XT13 Pro 的功耗非常低。即使在空闲模式下，我们测得的数值也很低。英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 的低功耗限制（PL1 和 PL2）确保了负载下相对较低的能耗要求。在平均负载情况下，系统的能耗略低于 50 瓦。在负载情况下，我们只能在系统仍能使用 Turbo 的短时间内看到 94.5 瓦的功耗。我们还观察到了一个有点奇怪的现象。在 Cinebench R23 Sigle 测试中，我们记录了大量的峰值，这在其他测试设备中从未见过。我们重复了几次测试，结果都一样。我们有理由认为，在这种情况下，SoC 会反复在极限温度下工作，从而允许它短暂地吸收更多电能。电源由一个 120 瓦的小型电源装置提供。许多 Geekom 设备都配备了相同的电源装置。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	1.6 / 2.8 Watt
Idle	6.3 / 7.1 / 9 Watt
Load	49.8 / 94.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Average of class Mini PC
Power Consumption		-38%	-34%	-35%	-21%	11%	3%	-41%
Idle Minimum *	6.3	8.2 -30%	8.2 -30%	9.1 -44%	5.7 10%	3.8 40%	5.34 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=193) 15%	9.51 ?(1.9 - 45.7, n=119, last 2 years) -51%
Idle Average *	7.1	10 -41%	12.1 -70%	10.3 -45%	9.5 -34%	4.8 32%	8.55 ?(3.8 - 63, n=193) -20%	11.7 ?(1.9 - 47.5, n=117, last 2 years) -65%
Idle Maximum *	9	14.6 -62%	14 -56%	14.4 -60%	16.5 -83%	6.5 28%	10.8 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=193) -20%	15.1 ?(2.6 - 57.1, n=119, last 2 years) -68%
Load Average *	49.8	73.9 -48%	53.1 -7%	54.9 -10%	53.3 -7%	71.9 -44%	45.3 ?(12.5 - 87.3, n=193) 9%	58.2 ?(11.3 - 170.6, n=119, last 2 years) -17%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	54	79.9 -48%
Load Maximum *	94.5	95.3 -1%	100.4 -6%	110.4 -17%	87.8 7%	94.7 -0%	67.5 ?(30.1 - 123.3, n=193) 29%	98.9 ?(18.1 - 423, n=119, last 2 years) -5%

* ... smaller is better

Efficiency

Performance Rating | Power Consumption

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	100 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	86.3 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	78.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	72.7 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	67.3 pt

Power Consumption
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	251 Points per Watt +31%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	205 Points per Watt +7%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	192.3 Points per Watt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	183.7 Points per Watt -4%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	182.7 (48.6^min, 48.7^P1 - 81.3^max) Points per Watt -5%
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	61.7 Points per Watt +55%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	55.6 Points per Watt +39%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	54.2 Points per Watt +36%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	39.9 Points per Watt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	37.1 Points per Watt -7%
Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor)
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	35.8 Points per Watt +30%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	31.2 Points per Watt +13%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	27.5 Points per Watt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	26.6 Points per Watt -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	24.7 Points per Watt -10%

Power consumption with external monitor

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.45 (6.3-9.04)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10 (9.28-14.3)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.2 (10.9-14.1)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.4 (9.08-14.4)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø79.6 (76-85.2)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø43.8 (42.6-45.7)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø48.4 (45.6-52.4)

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø57.2 (53.8-88.4)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø84.4 (83.6-85.1)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.8 (87.6-95.4)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø92.2 (78.7-114)

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø54 (52.8-55.9)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø79.9 (75.5-83.5)

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø49.8 (46-53.2)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø73.9 (55.4-87)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø53.1 (49.6-57.6)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø54.9 (50.2-57)

Power consumption with external monitor

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø89 (87.1-94.5)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø83.6 (80.7-95.3)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.1 (94.2-100.4)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø99.6 (92-110.4)

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø89 (83.2-91.1)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø82.1 (74.2-89.2)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø88 (87.7-88.3)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103 (99.2-107)

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø43.1 (15.9-70.3)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø34 (31.1-57.1)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø33.3 (28.9-63)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø32.7 (19.4-55.3)

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø62.4 (49.8-87.7)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.3 (72.3-87.5)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø87.7 (87.3-88.3)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø100.7 (97.2-108.6)

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø52.1 (50.2-55.2)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø83.1 (79.2-88.5)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø50.3 (47.7-65.3)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø49.7 (47.3-60.6)

Pros

+ 坚固紧凑的外壳

+ 现代设计和优质金属表面

+ 完美的工艺

+ 配备 P 核和 E 核的快速 SoC

+ 2x USB4

+ 易于打开

+ 快速 2 TB SSD

+ 36 个月保修

Cons

- iGPU 性能低下

- 负载情况下声音清晰

- 购买价格高

结论--价格高但性能不高

Geekom XT13 Pro 是一款功能强大的迷你 PC。不过，Geekom XT12 Pro 已经证明了这一点。如果我们仅将这两款产品进行比较，你可以选择较旧的设备，而不会有任何明显的性能损失。英特尔英特尔酷睿 i9-13900HGeekom XT13 Pro 的英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 无法带来明显的性能提升。与英特尔酷睿 i9-12900H 相比，技术差异太小。Geekom 不敢大胆迈出基于流星湖系列的迷你 PC 这一步。这意味着 Geekom 被甩在了后面，因为许多其他厂商已经在其型号系列中配备了英特尔的最新处理器。Geekom XT13 Pro 的最大缺点是 iGPU，在所有测试中都不如现代代表产品。不过，Geekom 在这方面不仅不如竞争对手，也不如自己。Geekom 自己的产品组合包括采用最新 AMD SoC 的迷你电脑，它们在技术上并不逊色，但在全面性能上却更胜一筹。我们甚至还没看价格。不幸的是，Geekom XT13 Pro 的价格完全超出了我们的预期。如果要成为顶级机型，目前的价格是 999 欧元。其他迷你电脑价格稍低，但性能更高。

Geekom XT13 Pro 配备英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 处理器，性能足够出色，而且功能多样，令人印象深刻。不过，Geekom XT13 Pro 的性价比完全不匹配。

值得肯定的是，Geekom XT13 Pro 具有良好的连接性，这也是 Geekom 过去屡屡加分的原因。在众多接口中，包括两个 USB4 端口，这可能会影响购买决策的未来性。制造商提供的三年保修服务也对 Geekom 的产品有利。当然，该制造商生产的其他设备也同样享有保修服务。与 Geekom XT12 Pro 相比，效率只能略有提高。在这方面，英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 显然不如更现代的流星湖处理器。因此，即使考虑到高昂的售价，我们也无法给 Geekom XT13 Pro 推荐购买。如果 Geekom XT13 Pro 不想成为 "货架上的暖男"，Geekom 急需修改目前的定价。

注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击这里.

价格和供应情况

Geekom XT13 Pro 可在Geekom或亚马逊购买。

Geekom XT13 Pro - 07/30/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade

Chassis

88 / 98 → 89%

Connectivity

65 / 81 → 80%

Weight

82%

Games Performance

29 / 80 → 36%

Application Performance

80 / 92 → 86%

Workstation

24%

AI Performance

75%

Temperature

90%

Noise

75%

Average

50%

72%

Mini PC - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
25%

Power Use
66.2%

Repairability
12.5%

Software Updates
39%

Total Sustainability Score: 28%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 (min) Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28.1
...
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	675
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	677
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	677
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	680
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	691
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	698
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	703
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

Geekom XT13 Pro 评测：NUC 迷你 PC 没有流星湖，只有英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H

进展有限！

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 金属与塑料的完美结合

尺寸比较

设备 - 选购齐全，2 个 USB4

交流

配件

维护

可持续性

性能 - 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H，14 个内核，20 个线程

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 多回路

系统性能

DPC 延迟

大容量存储器

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形

游戏性能

FPS chart

使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 进行 Geekom XT13 Pro 性能测试

排放 - 冷却能力弱，耗电量低

噪音排放

温度

耗电量

Efficiency

Power consumption with external monitor

Power consumption with external monitor

Pros

Cons

结论--价格高但性能不高

价格和供应情况

Transparency

Price comparison

More articles related to this device

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7946
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7957
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	7980
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8024
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8027
R7 5700G, Vega 8	8050
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8095
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609