宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo 14 (2024) 评测:超长运行时间的便携式 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑
宏碁的 Helios Neo 14 是一款功能强大的游戏笔记本电脑,采用 14.5 英寸的小巧机身。除了游戏之外,这款强大的产品还具有流媒体和渲染功能。必要的硬件一应俱全:酷睿 i9、GeForce RTX 4070 和 32 GB 内存。我们已经测试过它更大的 16 英寸姊妹机--Helios Neo 16。 Helios Neo 16几周前,我们已经测试过它更大的 16 英寸姊妹机--Helios Neo 16。竞争对手包括 XMG Fusion 15(早期 24), HP Omen Transcend 14, 雷蛇刀锋 14 2024和 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 2024.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.5 % | v8 | 08/2024 | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 20.9 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
88.9 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 21.9 mm | 15.30" | 2560x1600 | |
88.5 % | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.7 % | v7 (old) | 02/2024 | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
93 % | v7 (old) | 02/2024 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 16.3 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
外壳 - 宏碁采用多种材料组合
看来,高品质的材料只被少量使用:只有笔记本盖子的背面是铝制的,其余部分都是塑料。棱角分明的机身没有任何制造缺陷--底座和盖子可以轻微扭转。向盖子背面施压不会导致任何图像变化。其最大开启角度约为 155 度。
机箱大部分为黑色哑光,只有背面的风扇出风口采用了对比色,即浅灰色。它没有任何 LED 灯带,取而代之的是键盘背光(RGB)和背面的 Predator 发光徽标。
在本次比较的 14 英寸笔记本电脑中,Neo 14 是最笨重的--它与 刀锋 14,我们的测试样品重量最重。如果对你来说,小巧和重量是决定性因素,那么你将无法回避 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14.
连接性 - Helios Neo 配备 Thunderbolt 4,包括电源传输功能
这款笔记本电脑有两个 USB-A 端口(USB 3.2 Gen 2)和两个 USB-C 端口(1 个 Thunderbolt 4、1 个 USB 3.2 Gen 2)。后者均支持 Power Delivery 和 DP Alt 模式。该设备总共有三个视频输出接口(HDMI、2 个 DP)和一个音频接口。所有连接都集中在笔记本电脑的左右两侧。这意味着使用手托时,线缆不会碍手碍脚。值得注意的是,设备两侧各有一个 USB-A 和 USB-C 端口。
SD 读卡器
我们有些困惑,为什么宏碁安装的 microSD 读卡器只能提供非常低的传输速率(参考卡:AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)。华硕的竞争者们展示了他们的实力。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=94, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=95, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
交流
该无线模块使用了英特尔公司的 WiFi 6E 芯片(AX211),其名称为 "Killer AX1675i"。"杀手 "是英特尔游戏优化网络控制器的品牌。不出意外,在最佳条件下(附近没有 WiFi 设备,笔记本电脑和服务器电脑之间的距离很短),它能实现非常好的数据传输速率。宏碁没有为 Neo 配备千兆以太网端口。
网络摄像头
其网络摄像头(210 万像素)的画质与竞争对手不相上下。它没有机械盖。
配件
除了常规文件(快速入门指南、保修信息)外,这款笔记本电脑没有附带任何其他配件。
维护
拆卸底板有点麻烦:卸下底部的所有螺丝后,松开笔记本电脑顶部显示屏后面的塑料条。要小心,因为有很多塑料小钩子很容易断裂。然后可以使用撬棍或扁铲松开底板。同样要小心:后出风口也是底板的一部分。随后,您就可以接触到固态硬盘(PCIe 4,M.2-2280)、WiFi 模块(包括其天线)、风扇和电池。没有内存库。内存是永久焊接上去的。
可持续性
笔记本电脑的包装没有使用太多塑料:电源装在一个透明的袋子里,笔记本电脑装在一个 PET 纤维袋里。此外,还有一个用于保护显示屏的插页(PP)。纸板框架可保护设备在运输过程中免受碰撞。纸箱和所有纸箱部件均由可回收材料制成。由于底板可拆卸,因此可以进行维修--这样就可以接触到整个硬件。软件更新在未来几年都不成问题。
保修
只要是在美国购买的宏碁笔记本电脑,都享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。您可以付费将保修期延长至三年。
输入设备 - 带有三个背光区的 Acer 键盘
键盘
安装的 Chiclet 键盘按键均匀,键程较短,按压点清晰。按键的阻力适中。我们注意到,在键盘上打字时键盘会有轻微的晃动,但这不会影响日常使用。值得称赞的是它配备了常规尺寸的方向键。RGB 背光有三个区域和四个亮度级别。
触摸板
多点触摸点击板(12 x 7 厘米)用作鼠标的替代品,其光滑的表面便于手指滑动。它的行程短,压力点清晰。如有需要,可将触摸板停用。
显示屏 - 明亮的 IPS 面板,sRGB 覆盖范围
宏碁(Acer)为其 Neo 笔记本电脑配备了一个有点不同寻常的屏幕:它的直径为 14.5 英寸,分辨率为 3,072 x 1,920 像素,宽高比为 16:10,非常适合工作使用。G-Sync 技术、无 PWM 闪烁、响应时间短、亮度高,所有这些都有利于 165 Hz 雾面面板。其对比度刚好达到目标值。在户外完全可以阅读屏幕内容。不过,请确保阳光不要太强烈。
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 450 cd/m²
Contrast: 1000:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 1.21
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
66.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.214
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) BOE CQ NE145F8M-NY1, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5", 165 Hz | SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3", 240 Hz | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 TL140ADXP04-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 240 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U ATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 10% | 34% | 27% | 31% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65 | 73.5 13% | 99.6 53% | 96.9 49% | 99.6 53% |
sRGB Coverage | 95.3 | 100 5% | 100 5% | 99.8 5% | 100 5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.8 | 75 12% | 96.1 44% | 85 27% | 89.9 35% |
Response Times | 10% | 84% | -26% | 89% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 5.4 ? | 5 ? 7% | 0.86 ? 84% | 6 ? -11% | 0.62 ? 89% |
Response Time Black / White * | 5.9 ? | 5.2 ? 12% | 0.99 ? 83% | 8.3 ? -41% | 0.68 ? 88% |
PWM Frequency | 479 ? | 960 ? | |||
Screen | 7% | -1% | 21% | 557% | |
Brightness middle | 450 | 491 9% | 386.3 -14% | 484.1 8% | 423 -6% |
Brightness | 433 | 460 6% | 389 -10% | 466 8% | 424 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 89 2% | 98 13% | 89 2% | 98 13% |
Black Level * | 0.45 | 0.47 -4% | 0.38 16% | 0.01 98% | |
Contrast | 1000 | 1045 5% | 1274 27% | 42300 4130% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.26 | 2.16 4% | 4.03 -78% | 2.23 1% | 0.7 69% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.5 | 4.44 41% | 6.69 11% | 4.57 39% | 1.8 76% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.21 | 1.14 6% | 1.07 12% | 0.74 39% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 3.3 -3% | 1.2 62% | 1.6 50% | 0.8 75% |
Gamma | 2.214 99% | 2.204 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.18 101% |
CCT | 6121 106% | 6286 103% | 6280 104% | 6816 95% | 6505 100% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
8% | 39% /
22% | 7% /
16% | 226% /
363% |
* ... smaller is better
这块屏幕开箱后的色彩表现已经很不错了,我们通过自己的校准进一步改善了它的色彩表现:因此,其色彩偏差从 2.26 降至 1.21(目标:DeltaE < 3)。该面板几乎可以完整地描绘 sRGB 空间,而 AdobeRGB 或 DCI P3 则无法做到这一点。在这方面,竞争对手往往更胜一筹。
您可以免费下载并使用我们的色彩配置文件。链接可在显示器的信息框中找到。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.9 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
5.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.5 ms rise | |
↘ 2.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17271 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
表演 - 《掠食》使用流星湖和艾达-拉芙蕾丝
Neo 14 的目标用户是那些寻求便携、功能强大且体积小巧的笔记本电脑的用户。流星湖(Core Ultra 7、Core Ultra 9)和 Ada Lovelace(RTX 4060、RTX 4070)可提供所需的动力。我们的测试样品是顶级型号,配备酷睿 Ultra 9 185H、GeForce RTX 4070 和 32 GB 内存。它目前的售价约为 2,300 美元,起价约为 1,900 美元。
测试条件
连接电源时有四种系统模式可供选择,电池模式下有两种(见表)。我们在测试中使用了性能模式(基准测试)和环保模式(电池测试)。加速和性能模式要求电池电量至少达到 40%。否则,只能使用平衡模式。模式之间的切换通过一个按钮(键盘上方)或 PredatorSense 软件(笔记本电脑的控制中心)完成。LED 指示灯显示激活的模式。
Turbo | Performance | Balanced | Quiet | Balanced (battery) | Eco (battery) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
功率限制 1 (HWInfo) | 100 瓦 | 90 瓦 | 70 瓦 | 55 瓦 | 70 瓦 | 70 瓦 |
功率限制 2 (HWInfo) | 157 瓦 | 157 瓦 | 157 瓦 | 157 瓦 | 157 瓦 | 157 瓦 |
噪音 (CP 2077 Phantom) | 56 dB(A) | 50 dB(A) | 43 dB(A) | 38 dB(A) | - | - |
性能(CP 2077 Phantom) | 76 fps | 69 fps | 63 fps | 45 fps | - | - |
处理器
核心 Core Ultra 9 185H和 酷睿至尊 7 155H在 Neo 14 系列中,我们的测试设备配备了名义上性能更强的 Meteor Lake CPU。更高的 TDP(45 瓦对 28 瓦)使时钟频率略有提高--两款 CPU 均有 16 个内核(6P、8E、2LPE;22 个线程)。Ultra 9 的测试结果与 CPU 的平均水平相当:三种系统模式(性能模式、涡轮模式、平衡模式)的测试结果几乎相同,而静音模式的测试结果则略低于平均值。
CB15 循环出现了奇怪的变化:从第一次运行到第三次运行,其性能略有下降,然后保持在一个稳定的水平。在第十三次运行后,它再次达到原来的水平,然后一直保持下去。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
Cinebench R23 | |
Multi Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (12688 - 19851, n=15) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Single Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1166 - 1912, n=15) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4843 - 7651, n=15) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 855, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (442 - 735, n=15) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=207, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1582 - 3165, n=17) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (191.9 - 281, n=15) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (163 - 285, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=196, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) |
Geekbench 6.2 | |
Multi-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (6.2.1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1, Turbo) | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=106, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (6.2.1) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9140 - 14540, n=15) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (6.2.1) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (6.2.1) | |
Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (6.2.1) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (6.2.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=106, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (6.2.1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1, Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1490 - 2573, n=15) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (6.2.1) |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Multi-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9330 - 14230, n=15) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (986 - 1902, n=15) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (14.1 - 22.7, n=15) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (6.3.4.2) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (6.3.4.2) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=197, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (6.3.4.2) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (34.5 - 62, n=15) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (6.3.4.2) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.3.4.2) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.3.4.2, Turbo) |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (0.4313 - 0.759, n=16) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=197, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9220 - 18676, n=15) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=197, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (48865 - 96463, n=15) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2394 - 4534, n=15) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (66785 - 95241, n=15) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (7255 - 11392, n=15) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=197, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (24004 - 48020, n=15) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (53116 - 154066, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (678 - 1341, n=15) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=197, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4428 - 10078, n=15) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (44809 - 53918, n=15) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) |
系统性能
只要看一眼它的规格表,就会发现这款笔记本电脑并不缺乏计算能力。运行流畅的系统为游戏、流媒体和渲染做好了准备。系统基准测试证实了这一点。内存的传输速率达到了 LPDDR5X 内存的正常水平。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=177, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7490 - 7761, n=3) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10192 - 11133, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9067 - 9435, n=3) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (11369 - 13194, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1663 - 1917, n=3) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1573 - 1849, n=3) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1872 - 2008, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1338 - 1856, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=177, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (240 - 295, n=3) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (248 - 268, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=189, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (494 - 526, n=3) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7490 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (71360 - 95718, n=15) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=197, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (64619 - 87768, n=15) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51114 - 93871, n=15) | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (129 - 259, n=15) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=197, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
延迟的增加使用户无法实时编辑视频和音频。未来的软件更新可能会在这方面有所改进。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
宏碁为 Helios 14 配备了 SK Hynix 的 1 TB SSD(PCIe 4,M.2 2280),可提供出色的数据传输速率。正面:我们没有发现热引起的节流现象。该笔记本电脑无法容纳额外的固态硬盘。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
RTX 4000 系列中的 GeForce RTX 4070(4608 个着色器、128 位总线、快速 GDDR6 内存)代表了甜蜜点。宏碁允许其最大 TGP 为 125 瓦,这意味着它仍然低于 Nvidia 规定的最大值(140 瓦)。8 GB 的 VRAM 在未来几年可能会有些紧张。对内存要求更高的游戏可能会越来越多。其基准测试结果低于 RTX 4070 的平均水平。Turbo带来了明显的提升。在 dGPU 和 Optimus 之间切换无需重启,因为笔记本支持高级 Optimus。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 46434, n=58) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=206, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12242 - 33451, n=60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=202, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5012 - 13391, n=59) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 54512 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 29492 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23993 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10171 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2230 points | |
Help |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
OpenCL Score | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (17391 - 129366, n=59) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Vulkan Score 5.5 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (42883 - 102618, n=30) | |
Average of class Gaming (7995 - 163089, n=127, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) |
Geekbench 6.2 | |
GPU OpenCL | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (6.2.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (4321 - 207373, n=105, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (85488 - 129836, n=36) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (6.2.1) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (6.2.1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1, Turbo) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (6.2.1) | |
GPU Vulkan 6.2 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1, Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (6.2.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (4286 - 196201, n=102, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (6.2.1) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18099 - 120033, n=33) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (6.2.1) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (6.2.1) |
V-Ray 5 Benchmark | |
GPU RTX | |
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=117, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (5.0.1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (5.0.1, Turbo) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (5.0.1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (5.0.1) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (171 - 1872, n=36) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (5.0.1) | |
GPU CUDA | |
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (5.0.1, Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (5.0.1) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (5.0.1) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (5.0.1) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (120 - 1356, n=36) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (5.0.1) | |
CPU | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (5.0.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (3562 - 26944, n=127, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9339 - 20388, n=35) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (5.0.1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (5.0.1, Turbo) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (5.0.1) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (5.0.1) |
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | |
GPU | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v4.10.07, Turbo) | |
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (434 - 686, n=45) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v4.10.07 ) | |
CPU | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Average of class Gaming (5413 - 37629, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12638 - 35173, n=45) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v4.10.07. Turbo) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v4.10.07 ) |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
我们测得的帧率低于 RTX 4070 的平均水平(性能),而涡轮增压则带来了加分。屏幕的原生分辨率(3,072 x 1,920像素)经常被耗尽:在高至最高设置下可以进行3K游戏。更高分辨率(包括光线追踪)需要使用帧生成和 DLSS 3,但这些功能必须得到游戏的明确支持。
下表提供了一些游戏在原生屏幕分辨率下的帧率,以及我们在各个游戏中使用的相应最高设置。
博德之门 3 | 现代战争 3 | F1 24 | 对马之魂 | 龙之教条 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,072 x 1,920 像素,最高画质,无 DLSS | 52.3 帧/秒 | 49 帧/秒 | 29 帧/秒 | 38.9 帧/秒 | 44.1 帧/秒 |
Performance Rating - Percent | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 -1! | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (2.02) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (2.02) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (2.12, Turbo) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (30.7 - 90.7, n=28) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (2.02) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (2.12) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (2.02) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (48.3 - 140.5, n=54) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (1.3) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (1.3) | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (1.3, Turbo) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (41 - 131.9, n=56) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (1.3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (1.3) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (1.3) |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=193, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Turbo) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (76.3 - 234, n=57) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 220, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (89.7 - 187.5, n=58) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=207, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (58.9 - 144.4, n=60) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (54.1 - 127, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (64.7 - 74.1, n=5) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (36.7 - 84.7, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (41.1 - 48.4, n=5) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (59.2 - 129.5, n=8, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (65.2 - 73.9, n=4) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
Ghost of Tsushima | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (68.1 - 73.7, n=3) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (28.5 - 73.7, n=7, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (50.5 - 56.1, n=3) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (22.7 - 56.1, n=5, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Very High Preset + Quality DLSS | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.6 - 74.2, n=2) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (63.6 - 74.2, n=3, last 2 years) |
The First Descendant | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (73.7 - 80, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (15.4 - 80, n=5, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (48.2 - 51.2, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (43.7 - 51.2, n=3, last 2 years) |
赛博朋克 2077:魅影自由》在 30 分钟的运行时间内(最高设置、FHD),帧速率略有波动,但相当稳定。性能没有明显下降。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
GTA V (2015) | 179.7 | 175.8 | 167.9 | 104.8 | 87.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 161.7 | 144.5 | 141.6 | 130.8 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 185.2 | 140.8 | 104.6 | 76.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 117.1 | 101.6 | 78 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 408 | 266 | 211 | 183 | 121.2 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 156.6 | 124.1 | 109.1 | 107.9 | 75.5 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 116.8 | 99.7 | 83.7 | 72.4 | 43.6 |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 146 | 132 | 103 | 95 | 66 |
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) | 70.1 | 61.5 | 51.6 | ||
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 92.7 | 89.7 | 82.1 | 68.9 | 52.8 |
F1 24 (2024) | 218 | 211 | 179.4 | 64.7 | 41.1 |
The First Descendant (2024) | 162.7 | 106.5 | 87.2 | 78.6 | 50.1 |
排放 - 紧凑型宏碁笔记本电脑发热量很大
噪音排放
不足为奇:在小巧的笔记本电脑中安装强大的硬件,会产生相当高的噪音。游戏时,噪音值最高可达 56 dB(A)(涡轮增压)或 50 dB(A)(高性能)。平衡模式和安静模式的噪音值要适中得多,但也牺牲了一些性能。在日常使用(办公、上网)和闲置时,风扇通常始终以低速运行。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 29 / 31 / 36 dB(A) |
Load |
| 47 / 52 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N | SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | 18% | 16% | 15% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 25 -4% | 24.5 -2% | 24.3 -1% | 23.9 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 29 | 27 7% | 24.7 15% | 25 14% | 23.9 18% |
Idle Average * | 31 | 28 10% | 24.7 20% | 25 19% | 23.9 23% |
Idle Maximum * | 36 | 33 8% | 24.7 31% | 25 31% | 23.9 34% |
Load Average * | 47 | 52 -11% | 25.2 46% | 33 30% | 46.2 2% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 50 | ||||
Load Maximum * | 52 | 53 -2% | 52 -0% | 51.9 -0% | 46.2 11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51 | 47 | 49.5 | 46.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
笔记本电脑发热明显:赛博朋克和压力测试导致多个测量点的温度超过 50 摄氏度。在日常使用(办公、上网)过程中,温度也高于平均值。掌托的温度有时处于边缘范围。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 10% | 25% | 7% | 16% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 57 | 48 16% | 41.2 28% | 41.8 27% | 46.6 18% |
Maximum Bottom * | 55 | 56 -2% | 39 29% | 42.2 23% | 47.8 13% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 28 12% | 26.2 18% | 34.8 -9% | 26.7 17% |
Idle Bottom * | 33 | 29 12% | 25.4 23% | 37.4 -13% | 27.8 16% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
极限压力测试场景(Prime95 和 Furmark 连续运行)检查系统在满负荷情况下的稳定性。CPU 和 GPU 在测试中以中高水平的时钟频率波动运行。
发言人
与许多其他笔记本电脑扬声器一样,Neo 14 的型号也缺乏低音。除此之外,它们还能产生相当不错的音效。连接耳机或外置扬声器可以获得更好的音效体验。
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - Neo 14 的运行时间非常出色
耗电量
在测试过程中,笔记本电脑没有显示任何明显的功耗值。对于已安装的硬件来说,这些值是正常的。压力测试和《赛博朋克 2077》在运行时,功耗会出现波动,曲线很好地反映了我们测得的时钟频率。230 瓦的电源仍然足够大。适配器在应对短期负载峰值时没有出现任何问题。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / Watt |
Idle | 6 / 11 / 21 Watt |
Load |
93 / 252 Watt |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -22% | -4% | -81% | 24% | -48% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6 | 8 -33% | 9.1 -52% | 20.9 -248% | 6.9 -15% | 13.5 ? -125% |
Idle Average * | 11 | 14 -27% | 12.6 -15% | 25.6 -133% | 8.6 22% | 19 ? -73% |
Idle Maximum * | 21 | 26 -24% | 27.4 -30% | 32.1 -53% | 9 57% | 26.8 ? -28% |
Load Average * | 93 | 118 -27% | 63.5 32% | 72.7 22% | 75.2 19% | 107.4 ? -15% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 146.3 | |||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 147.9 | |||||
Load Maximum * | 252 | 244 3% | 135.3 46% | 228.4 9% | 161.6 36% | 251 ? -0% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 192.7 | 118.9 | 182.1 | 109.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
结合生态模式,Neo 的 76 瓦时电池可提供非常出色的运行时间:在 WiFi 测试(使用脚本调用网站)和视频测试(循环播放短片 Big Buck Bunny(H.264 编码,FHD))中,它的运行时间分别达到了 8:39 小时和 9:15 小时。但遗憾的是,Neo 无法接近 华硕 G14.
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 71 Wh | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 19% | -19% | -29% | 1% | -25% | |
Reader / Idle | 808 | 911 13% | 622 -23% | 480 -41% | 560 ? -31% | |
H.264 | 555 | 602 8% | 725 31% | 416 ? -25% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 519 | 480 -8% | 517 0% | 428 -18% | 555 7% | 376 ? -28% |
Load | 100 | 164 64% | 66 -34% | 72 -28% | 64 -36% | 86 ? -14% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 便携式动力装置
Neo 14 内置的强大硬件能够提供持久的高性能。与此同时,这款笔记本电脑凭借其小巧的机身、适中的重量以及超长的运行时间(WiFi > 8 小时),拥有极佳的便携性。
宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo 14 (2024) 实现了它的承诺:它是一款便携、功能强大的笔记本电脑,适合游戏玩家和创作者使用。
高排放是无法避免的:笔记本电脑会明显发热并产生大量噪音。要想获得更舒适的使用体验,就必须以牺牲设备性能为代价,但即便如此,这也不妨碍你使用它玩游戏。
Neo 14 的特点包括:哑光、明亮的 14.5 英寸显示屏(3072 x 1920 像素、IPS、165 Hz、sRGB、G-Sync),宽高比为 16:10,适合工作使用;两个 USB-C 端口支持 Power Delivery,这意味着你可以将笨重的宏碁专有电源(230 瓦)留在家里。缺点它只有一个固态硬盘插槽,内置内存无法扩展,读卡器速度较慢。
另一种选择是 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14.它的性能与华硕 Zephyrus G14 不相上下,而且还采用了 OLED 面板,运行时间更长。
价格和供应情况
宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo 14 目前在亚马逊上的售价约为1,680 美元。
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024)
-
08/12/2024 v8
Sascha Mölck
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.