宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo 14 (2024) 评测:超长运行时间的便携式 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑
宏碁的 Helios Neo 14 是一款功能强大的游戏笔记本电脑,采用 14.5 英寸的小巧机身。除了游戏之外,这款强大的产品还具有流媒体和渲染功能。必要的硬件一应俱全:酷睿 i9、GeForce RTX 4070 和 32 GB 内存。我们已经测试过它更大的 16 英寸姊妹机--Helios Neo 16。 Helios Neo 16几周前,我们已经测试过它更大的 16 英寸姊妹机--Helios Neo 16。竞争对手包括 XMG Fusion 15(早期 24), HP Omen Transcend 14, 雷蛇刀锋 14 2024和 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 2024.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.5 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 20.9 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
88.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 21.9 mm | 15.30" | 2560x1600 | |
88.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
93 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 16.3 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
外壳 - 宏碁采用多种材料组合
看来,高品质的材料只被少量使用:只有笔记本盖子的背面是铝制的,其余部分都是塑料。棱角分明的机身没有任何制造缺陷--底座和盖子可以轻微扭转。向盖子背面施压不会导致任何图像变化。其最大开启角度约为 155 度。
机箱大部分为黑色哑光,只有背面的风扇出风口采用了对比色,即浅灰色。它没有任何 LED 灯带,取而代之的是键盘背光(RGB)和背面的 Predator 发光徽标。
在本次比较的 14 英寸笔记本电脑中,Neo 14 是最笨重的--它与 刀锋 14,我们的测试样品重量最重。如果对你来说,小巧和重量是决定性因素,那么你将无法回避 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14.
连接性 - Helios Neo 配备 Thunderbolt 4,包括电源传输功能
这款笔记本电脑有两个 USB-A 端口(USB 3.2 Gen 2)和两个 USB-C 端口(1 个 Thunderbolt 4、1 个 USB 3.2 Gen 2)。后者均支持 Power Delivery 和 DP Alt 模式。该设备总共有三个视频输出接口(HDMI、2 个 DP)和一个音频接口。所有连接都集中在笔记本电脑的左右两侧。这意味着使用手托时,线缆不会碍手碍脚。值得注意的是,设备两侧各有一个 USB-A 和 USB-C 端口。
SD 读卡器
我们有些困惑,为什么宏碁安装的 microSD 读卡器只能提供非常低的传输速率(参考卡:AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)。华硕的竞争者们展示了他们的实力。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
交流
该无线模块使用了英特尔公司的 WiFi 6E 芯片(AX211),其名称为 "Killer AX1675i"。"杀手 "是英特尔游戏优化网络控制器的品牌。不出意外,在最佳条件下(附近没有 WiFi 设备,笔记本电脑和服务器电脑之间的距离很短),它能实现非常好的数据传输速率。宏碁没有为 Neo 配备千兆以太网端口。
网络摄像头
其网络摄像头(210 万像素)的画质与竞争对手不相上下。它没有机械盖。
配件
除了常规文件(快速入门指南、保修信息)外,这款笔记本电脑没有附带任何其他配件。
维护
拆卸底板有点麻烦:卸下底部的所有螺丝后,松开笔记本电脑顶部显示屏后面的塑料条。要小心,因为有很多塑料小钩子很容易断裂。然后可以使用撬棍或扁铲松开底板。同样要小心:后出风口也是底板的一部分。随后,您就可以接触到固态硬盘(PCIe 4,M.2-2280)、WiFi 模块(包括其天线)、风扇和电池。没有内存库。内存是永久焊接上去的。
可持续性
笔记本电脑的包装没有使用太多塑料:电源装在一个透明的袋子里,笔记本电脑装在一个 PET 纤维袋里。此外,还有一个用于保护显示屏的插页(PP)。纸板框架可保护设备在运输过程中免受碰撞。纸箱和所有纸箱部件均由可回收材料制成。由于底板可拆卸,因此可以进行维修--这样就可以接触到整个硬件。软件更新在未来几年都不成问题。
保修
只要是在美国购买的宏碁笔记本电脑,都享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。您可以付费将保修期延长至三年。
输入设备 - 带有三个背光区的 Acer 键盘
键盘
安装的 Chiclet 键盘按键均匀,键程较短,按压点清晰。按键的阻力适中。我们注意到,在键盘上打字时键盘会有轻微的晃动,但这不会影响日常使用。值得称赞的是它配备了常规尺寸的方向键。RGB 背光有三个区域和四个亮度级别。
触摸板
多点触摸点击板(12 x 7 厘米)用作鼠标的替代品,其光滑的表面便于手指滑动。它的行程短,压力点清晰。如有需要,可将触摸板停用。
显示屏 - 明亮的 IPS 面板,sRGB 覆盖范围
宏碁(Acer)为其 Neo 笔记本电脑配备了一个有点不同寻常的屏幕:它的直径为 14.5 英寸,分辨率为 3,072 x 1,920 像素,宽高比为 16:10,非常适合工作使用。G-Sync 技术、无 PWM 闪烁、响应时间短、亮度高,所有这些都有利于 165 Hz 雾面面板。其对比度刚好达到目标值。在户外完全可以阅读屏幕内容。不过,请确保阳光不要太强烈。
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 450 cd/m²
Contrast: 1000:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.21
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
66.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.214
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) BOE CQ NE145F8M-NY1, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5", 165 Hz | SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3", 240 Hz | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 TL140ADXP04-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 240 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U ATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 10% | 34% | 27% | 31% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65 | 73.5 13% | 99.6 53% | 96.9 49% | 99.6 53% |
sRGB Coverage | 95.3 | 100 5% | 100 5% | 99.8 5% | 100 5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.8 | 75 12% | 96.1 44% | 85 27% | 89.9 35% |
Response Times | 10% | 84% | -26% | 89% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 5.4 ? | 5 ? 7% | 0.86 ? 84% | 6 ? -11% | 0.62 ? 89% |
Response Time Black / White * | 5.9 ? | 5.2 ? 12% | 0.99 ? 83% | 8.3 ? -41% | 0.68 ? 88% |
PWM Frequency | 479 ? | 960 ? | |||
Screen | 7% | -1% | 21% | 557% | |
Brightness middle | 450 | 491 9% | 386.3 -14% | 484.1 8% | 423 -6% |
Brightness | 433 | 460 6% | 389 -10% | 466 8% | 424 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 89 2% | 98 13% | 89 2% | 98 13% |
Black Level * | 0.45 | 0.47 -4% | 0.38 16% | 0.01 98% | |
Contrast | 1000 | 1045 5% | 1274 27% | 42300 4130% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.26 | 2.16 4% | 4.03 -78% | 2.23 1% | 0.7 69% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.5 | 4.44 41% | 6.69 11% | 4.57 39% | 1.8 76% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.21 | 1.14 6% | 1.07 12% | 0.74 39% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 3.3 -3% | 1.2 62% | 1.6 50% | 0.8 75% |
Gamma | 2.214 99% | 2.204 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.18 101% |
CCT | 6121 106% | 6286 103% | 6280 104% | 6816 95% | 6505 100% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
8% | 39% /
22% | 7% /
16% | 226% /
363% |
* ... smaller is better
这块屏幕开箱后的色彩表现已经很不错了,我们通过自己的校准进一步改善了它的色彩表现:因此,其色彩偏差从 2.26 降至 1.21(目标:DeltaE < 3)。该面板几乎可以完整地描绘 sRGB 空间,而 AdobeRGB 或 DCI P3 则无法做到这一点。在这方面,竞争对手往往更胜一筹。
您可以免费下载并使用我们的色彩配置文件。链接可在显示器的信息框中找到。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.9 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
5.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.5 ms rise | |
↘ 2.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
表演 - 《掠食》使用流星湖和艾达-拉芙蕾丝
Neo 14 的目标用户是那些寻求便携、功能强大且体积小巧的笔记本电脑的用户。流星湖(Core Ultra 7、Core Ultra 9)和 Ada Lovelace(RTX 4060、RTX 4070)可提供所需的动力。我们的测试样品是顶级型号,配备酷睿 Ultra 9 185H、GeForce RTX 4070 和 32 GB 内存。它目前的售价约为 2,300 美元,起价约为 1,900 美元。
测试条件
连接电源时有四种系统模式可供选择,电池模式下有两种(见表)。我们在测试中使用了性能模式(基准测试)和环保模式(电池测试)。加速和性能模式要求电池电量至少达到 40%。否则,只能使用平衡模式。模式之间的切换通过一个按钮(键盘上方)或 PredatorSense 软件(笔记本电脑的控制中心)完成。LED 指示灯显示激活的模式。
Turbo | Performance | Balanced | Quiet | Balanced (battery) | Eco (battery) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
功率限制 1 (HWInfo) | 100 瓦 | 90 瓦 | 70 瓦 | 55 瓦 | 70 瓦 | 70 瓦 |
功率限制 2 (HWInfo) | 157 瓦 | 157 瓦 | 157 瓦 | 157 瓦 | 157 瓦 | 157 瓦 |
噪音 (CP 2077 Phantom) | 56 dB(A) | 50 dB(A) | 43 dB(A) | 38 dB(A) | - | - |
性能(CP 2077 Phantom) | 76 fps | 69 fps | 63 fps | 45 fps | - | - |
处理器
核心 Core Ultra 9 185H和 酷睿至尊 7 155H在 Neo 14 系列中,我们的测试设备配备了名义上性能更强的 Meteor Lake CPU。更高的 TDP(45 瓦对 28 瓦)使时钟频率略有提高--两款 CPU 均有 16 个内核(6P、8E、2LPE;22 个线程)。Ultra 9 的测试结果与 CPU 的平均水平相当:三种系统模式(性能模式、涡轮模式、平衡模式)的测试结果几乎相同,而静音模式的测试结果则略低于平均值。
CB15 循环出现了奇怪的变化:从第一次运行到第三次运行,其性能略有下降,然后保持在一个稳定的水平。在第十三次运行后,它再次达到原来的水平,然后一直保持下去。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
Cinebench R23 | |
Multi Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (12688 - 19851, n=17) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Single Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1166 - 1912, n=17) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4843 - 7651, n=17) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (442 - 735, n=17) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1582 - 3165, n=19) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (191.9 - 281, n=17) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (163 - 285, n=17) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) |
Geekbench 6.3 | |
Multi-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (6.2.1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1, Turbo) | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (6.2.1) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9140 - 14540, n=17) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (6.2.1) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (6.2.1) | |
Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (6.2.1) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (6.2.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (6.2.1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1, Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1490 - 2573, n=17) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (6.2.1) |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Multi-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9330 - 14230, n=17) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (986 - 1902, n=17) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (14.1 - 22.7, n=17) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (6.3.4.2) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (6.3.4.2) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (6.3.4.2) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (34.5 - 62, n=17) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (6.3.4.2) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.3.4.2) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.3.4.2, Turbo) |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (0.4313 - 0.759, n=18) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9220 - 18676, n=17) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (48865 - 96463, n=17) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2394 - 4534, n=17) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (66785 - 95241, n=17) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (7255 - 11392, n=17) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (24004 - 48020, n=17) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (53116 - 154066, n=17) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (678 - 1341, n=17) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4428 - 10078, n=17) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (44809 - 53918, n=17) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v6.92.6600) |
系统性能
只要看一眼它的规格表,就会发现这款笔记本电脑并不缺乏计算能力。运行流畅的系统为游戏、流媒体和渲染做好了准备。系统基准测试证实了这一点。内存的传输速率达到了 LPDDR5X 内存的正常水平。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7490 - 7761, n=3) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10192 - 11133, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9067 - 9435, n=3) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (11369 - 13194, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1663 - 1917, n=3) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1573 - 1849, n=3) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1872 - 2008, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1338 - 1856, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (240 - 295, n=3) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=153, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (248 - 268, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (494 - 526, n=3) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 779, n=179, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7490 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (69929 - 95718, n=17) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (64619 - 87768, n=17) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51114 - 93871, n=17) | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (121.4 - 259, n=17) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
延迟的增加使用户无法实时编辑视频和音频。未来的软件更新可能会在这方面有所改进。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
宏碁为 Helios 14 配备了 SK Hynix 的 1 TB SSD(PCIe 4,M.2 2280),可提供出色的数据传输速率。正面:我们没有发现热引起的节流现象。该笔记本电脑无法容纳额外的固态硬盘。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
RTX 4000 系列中的 GeForce RTX 4070(4608 个着色器、128 位总线、快速 GDDR6 内存)代表了甜蜜点。宏碁允许其最大 TGP 为 125 瓦,这意味着它仍然低于 Nvidia 规定的最大值(140 瓦)。8 GB 的 VRAM 在未来几年可能会有些紧张。对内存要求更高的游戏可能会越来越多。其基准测试结果低于 RTX 4070 的平均水平。Turbo带来了明显的提升。在 dGPU 和 Optimus 之间切换无需重启,因为笔记本支持高级 Optimus。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 46434, n=59) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12242 - 33451, n=62) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5012 - 13391, n=60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 54512 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 29492 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23993 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10171 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2230 points | |
Help |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
OpenCL Score | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (17391 - 129366, n=61) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Vulkan Score 5.5 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average of class Gaming (7995 - 163089, n=123, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (42883 - 102618, n=32) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) |
Geekbench 6.3 | |
GPU OpenCL | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (6.2.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (4321 - 207373, n=109, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (85488 - 129836, n=37) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (6.2.1) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (6.2.1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1, Turbo) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (6.2.1) | |
GPU Vulkan | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1, Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (6.2.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (4286 - 196201, n=106, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (6.2.1) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18099 - 120033, n=34) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (6.2.1) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (6.2.1) |
V-Ray 5 Benchmark | |
GPU RTX | |
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=114, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (5.0.1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (5.0.1, Turbo) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (5.0.1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (5.0.1) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (171 - 1872, n=36) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (5.0.1) | |
GPU CUDA | |
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=116, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (5.0.1, Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (5.0.1) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (5.0.1) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (5.0.1) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (120 - 1356, n=36) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (5.0.1) | |
CPU | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (5.0.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (3562 - 26944, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9339 - 20388, n=35) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (5.0.1) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (5.0.1, Turbo) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (5.0.1) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (5.0.1) |
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | |
GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v4.10.07, Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (434 - 686, n=46) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v4.10.07 ) | |
CPU | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Average of class Gaming (5413 - 37629, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12638 - 35173, n=46) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (v4.10.07. Turbo) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (v4.10.07 ) |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
我们测得的帧率低于 RTX 4070 的平均水平(性能),而涡轮增压则带来了加分。屏幕的原生分辨率(3,072 x 1,920像素)经常被耗尽:在高至最高设置下可以进行3K游戏。更高分辨率(包括光线追踪)需要使用帧生成和 DLSS 3,但这些功能必须得到游戏的明确支持。
下表提供了一些游戏在原生屏幕分辨率下的帧率,以及我们在各个游戏中使用的相应最高设置。
博德之门 3 | 现代战争 3 | F1 24 | 对马之魂 | 龙之教条 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,072 x 1,920 像素,最高画质,无 DLSS | 52.3 帧/秒 | 49 帧/秒 | 29 帧/秒 | 38.9 帧/秒 | 44.1 帧/秒 |
Performance Rating - Percent | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 -1! | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (2.02) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (2.02) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (2.12, Turbo) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (30.7 - 90.7, n=29) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (2.02) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (2.12) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (2.02) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (48.3 - 140.5, n=55) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (1.3) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 (1.3) | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (1.3, Turbo) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (41 - 131.9, n=57) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (1.3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (1.3) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (1.3) |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Turbo) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (76.3 - 234, n=58) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (89.7 - 187.5, n=59) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (58.9 - 144.4, n=61) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (Turbo) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (54.1 - 127, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (64.7 - 74.1, n=6) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (36.7 - 84.7, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (41.1 - 48.4, n=6) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (59.2 - 129.5, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (65.2 - 73.9, n=5) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) |
Ghost of Tsushima | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (68.1 - 73.7, n=3) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (28.5 - 73.7, n=7, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (50.5 - 56.1, n=3) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (22.7 - 56.1, n=5, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Very High Preset + Quality DLSS | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.6 - 74.2, n=2) | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (63.6 - 74.2, n=3, last 2 years) |
The First Descendant | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (73.7 - 80, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (15.4 - 80, n=5, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (48.2 - 51.2, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (43.7 - 51.2, n=3, last 2 years) |
赛博朋克 2077:魅影自由》在 30 分钟的运行时间内(最高设置、FHD),帧速率略有波动,但相当稳定。性能没有明显下降。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 179.7 | 175.8 | 167.9 | 104.8 | 87.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 161.7 | 144.5 | 141.6 | 130.8 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 185.2 | 140.8 | 104.6 | 76.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 117.1 | 101.6 | 78 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 408 | 266 | 211 | 183 | 121.2 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 156.6 | 124.1 | 109.1 | 107.9 | 75.5 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 116.8 | 99.7 | 83.7 | 72.4 | 43.6 |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 146 | 132 | 103 | 95 | 66 |
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) | 70.1 | 61.5 | 51.6 | ||
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 92.7 | 89.7 | 82.1 | 68.9 | 52.8 |
F1 24 (2024) | 218 | 211 | 179.4 | 64.7 | 41.1 |
The First Descendant (2024) | 162.7 | 106.5 | 87.2 | 78.6 | 50.1 |
排放 - 紧凑型宏碁笔记本电脑发热量很大
噪音排放
不足为奇:在小巧的笔记本电脑中安装强大的硬件,会产生相当高的噪音。游戏时,噪音值最高可达 56 dB(A)(涡轮增压)或 50 dB(A)(高性能)。平衡模式和安静模式的噪音值要适中得多,但也牺牲了一些性能。在日常使用(办公、上网)和闲置时,风扇通常始终以低速运行。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 29 / 31 / 36 dB(A) |
Load |
| 47 / 52 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N | SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | 18% | 16% | 15% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 25 -4% | 24.5 -2% | 24.3 -1% | 23.9 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 29 | 27 7% | 24.7 15% | 25 14% | 23.9 18% |
Idle Average * | 31 | 28 10% | 24.7 20% | 25 19% | 23.9 23% |
Idle Maximum * | 36 | 33 8% | 24.7 31% | 25 31% | 23.9 34% |
Load Average * | 47 | 52 -11% | 25.2 46% | 33 30% | 46.2 2% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 50 | ||||
Load Maximum * | 52 | 53 -2% | 52 -0% | 51.9 -0% | 46.2 11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51 | 47 | 49.5 | 46.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
笔记本电脑发热明显:赛博朋克和压力测试导致多个测量点的温度超过 50 摄氏度。在日常使用(办公、上网)过程中,温度也高于平均值。掌托的温度有时处于边缘范围。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 10% | 25% | 7% | 16% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 57 | 48 16% | 41.2 28% | 41.8 27% | 46.6 18% |
Maximum Bottom * | 55 | 56 -2% | 39 29% | 42.2 23% | 47.8 13% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 28 12% | 26.2 18% | 34.8 -9% | 26.7 17% |
Idle Bottom * | 33 | 29 12% | 25.4 23% | 37.4 -13% | 27.8 16% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
极限压力测试场景(Prime95 和 Furmark 连续运行)检查系统在满负荷情况下的稳定性。CPU 和 GPU 在测试中以中高水平的时钟频率波动运行。
发言人
与许多其他笔记本电脑扬声器一样,Neo 14 的型号也缺乏低音。除此之外,它们还能产生相当不错的音效。连接耳机或外置扬声器可以获得更好的音效体验。
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - Neo 14 的运行时间非常出色
耗电量
在测试过程中,笔记本电脑没有显示任何明显的功耗值。对于已安装的硬件来说,这些值是正常的。压力测试和《赛博朋克 2077》在运行时,功耗会出现波动,曲线很好地反映了我们测得的时钟频率。230 瓦的电源仍然足够大。适配器在应对短期负载峰值时没有出现任何问题。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / Watt |
Idle | 6 / 11 / 21 Watt |
Load |
93 / 252 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -22% | -4% | -81% | 24% | -48% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6 | 8 -33% | 9.1 -52% | 20.9 -248% | 6.9 -15% | 13.5 ? -125% |
Idle Average * | 11 | 14 -27% | 12.6 -15% | 25.6 -133% | 8.6 22% | 18.9 ? -72% |
Idle Maximum * | 21 | 26 -24% | 27.4 -30% | 32.1 -53% | 9 57% | 26.7 ? -27% |
Load Average * | 93 | 118 -27% | 63.5 32% | 72.7 22% | 75.2 19% | 106.6 ? -15% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 146.3 | |||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 147.9 | |||||
Load Maximum * | 252 | 244 3% | 135.3 46% | 228.4 9% | 161.6 36% | 249 ? 1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 192.7 | 118.9 | 182.1 | 109.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
结合生态模式,Neo 的 76 瓦时电池可提供非常出色的运行时间:在 WiFi 测试(使用脚本调用网站)和视频测试(循环播放短片 Big Buck Bunny(H.264 编码,FHD))中,它的运行时间分别达到了 8:39 小时和 9:15 小时。但遗憾的是,Neo 无法接近 华硕 G14.
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 71 Wh | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 19% | -19% | -29% | 1% | -25% | |
Reader / Idle | 808 | 911 13% | 622 -23% | 480 -41% | 565 ? -30% | |
H.264 | 555 | 602 8% | 725 31% | 408 ? -26% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 519 | 480 -8% | 517 0% | 428 -18% | 555 7% | 376 ? -28% |
Load | 100 | 164 64% | 66 -34% | 72 -28% | 64 -36% | 85.3 ? -15% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 便携式动力装置
Neo 14 内置的强大硬件能够提供持久的高性能。与此同时,这款笔记本电脑凭借其小巧的机身、适中的重量以及超长的运行时间(WiFi > 8 小时),拥有极佳的便携性。
宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo 14 (2024) 实现了它的承诺:它是一款便携、功能强大的笔记本电脑,适合游戏玩家和创作者使用。
高排放是无法避免的:笔记本电脑会明显发热并产生大量噪音。要想获得更舒适的使用体验,就必须以牺牲设备性能为代价,但即便如此,这也不妨碍你使用它玩游戏。
Neo 14 的特点包括:哑光、明亮的 14.5 英寸显示屏(3072 x 1920 像素、IPS、165 Hz、sRGB、G-Sync),宽高比为 16:10,适合工作使用;两个 USB-C 端口支持 Power Delivery,这意味着你可以将笨重的宏碁专有电源(230 瓦)留在家里。缺点它只有一个固态硬盘插槽,内置内存无法扩展,读卡器速度较慢。
另一种选择是 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14.它的性能与华硕 Zephyrus G14 不相上下,而且还采用了 OLED 面板,运行时间更长。
价格和供应情况
宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo 14 目前在亚马逊上的售价约为1,680 美元。
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024)
- 08/12/2024 v8
Sascha Mölck
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.