惠普 Omen Transcend 14 笔记本电脑评测:值得考虑的 Razer Blade 替代产品
在 2024 年美国消费电子展上亮相Omen Transcend 14 是专为学生或游戏玩家设计的,他们希望随时随地进行游戏、制作和创作,并强调便携性。因此,它是 Omen 系列中体积最小、重量最轻的笔记本电脑之一,屏幕尺寸仅为 14 英寸。
我们的评测机采用中端配置,配备酷睿至尊 7 155H CPU、16 GB LPDDR5x 内存和 50 WGeForce RTX 4060 GPU,售价约为 1700 美元。其他配置包括速度较慢的 RTX 4050、速度较快的 RTX 4070 或酷睿 Ultra 9 185H,价格从 1500 美元到 2100 美元不等,但所有选项都配备相同的 2880 x 1800 120 Hz OLED 显示屏。
Omen Transcend 14 的替代产品包括其他配备GeForce RTX 显卡的高性能 14 英寸笔记本电脑,如 Razer Blade 14, 华硕 Zephyrus G14或 联想Legion Slim 5 14.
更多惠普评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.5 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
93 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 16.3 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.7 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 20.79 mm | 14.50" | 2880x1600 | |
93.2 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, M3 Pro 14-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 | |
85.5 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 22 mm | 14.40" | 2400x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 最微弱的预兆
这款机箱的设计灵感来自于较大的 欧曼创见 16包括略微突出的后部、单一色调、光滑平整的表面、圆润的边缘和边角以及最少的装饰。与玩家气息浓厚的 Zephyrus G14 设计相比,它的外观简洁低调,适合大多数环境。
遗憾的是,与 Blade 14 或 Zephyrus G14 相比,它的刚性明显较弱。 Zephyrus G14.特别是 HP 的盖子更容易弯曲、扭曲和摇晃,幅度明显更大。如果采用更坚固的铰链,将大大提高机箱的使用寿命和整体印象。
该型号的厚度仅比 刀锋 14或 2024 Zephyrus G14 厚 1 到 2 毫米,而占地面积仅稍大一些。在实际使用中,这些微小的尺寸差异几乎可以忽略不计,因此我们的惠普产品在便携性方面仍然不逊于任何一款最接近的 14.0 英寸竞争对手。联想的Legion Slim 5 14 明显要大一些,但它的 14.5 英寸屏幕要稍大一些。
连接性 - 与刀片 14 相似
端口选项与 Razer Blade 14 相同,只是进行了重新安排。请记住,虽然系统可以通过两个 USB-C 端口中的任何一个充电,但只有后置 USB-C 端口支持 140 W 充电。因此,交流适配器必须连接到后置 USB-C 端口才能充分发挥系统性能,否则如果交流适配器连接到 "错误的 "USB-C 端口,系统会弹出提示,通知用户性能降低。
交流
产品可能配备 Wi-Fi 6E 或 Wi-Fi 7 无线局域网模块。我们的评测机配备了英特尔 BE200,用于连接 Wi-Fi 7。虽然我们尚未获得 Wi-Fi 7 测试路由器,但在与华硕 AXE11000 Wi-Fi 6E 网络配对时,我们体验到了稳定的性能,没有出现任何问题。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 |
网络摄像头
200 万像素网络摄像头包含红外功能,但没有隐私快门。与大多数其他笔记本电脑上的网络摄像头相比,图像质量奇差无比。
维护
底部面板仅由四颗小型十字螺丝固定,维修起来相对容易。不过,底板连接紧密,边缘锋利,因此我们建议在拆卸底板时使用信用卡之类的塑料边缘。
配件和保修
某些配置包括一个 HyperX Cloud III 无线耳机。除此以外,购买者还可以期待常见的文件和交流适配器。
如果在美国购买,则适用于标准的一年有限制造商保修。
输入设备 - 大而多彩
键盘
该机型采用了无格子键盘设计,与大多数其他笔记本电脑的chiclet 键盘形成鲜明对比。这种设计使按键的尺寸更大,周围的半透明度更高,从而在背光激活时最大限度地实现 RGB 效果。诚然,这是一个令人满意的视觉变化,有助于将 Omen Transcend 14 与竞争对手甚至其他 Omen 游戏笔记本电脑区分开来。
与 Blade 14 相比,Omen 创见 14 的键入体验感觉更清晰,也更少海绵感,但敲击声也因此变得更尖锐、更响亮。键程仍然很浅,这是薄机身设计的结果。
需要注意的是,由于不支持按键 RGB 灯光,键盘背光仅限于四个不同的区域。
触摸板
点击板的尺寸比 刀锋 14(12.5 x 8 厘米对 15 x 8.5 厘米),但对于 14 英寸的屏幕尺寸来说仍然宽敞。在中高速运行时滑动顺畅,在低速运行时有一些粘滞感,可实现更精确的点击或操作。
不过,按下点击板时的行程较浅,这也在意料之中。反馈足够充分,与典型的超极本没有什么不同。
显示屏 - 与 Zephyrus G14 相似
我们的惠普采用了与 2024 Zephyrus G14 类似的三星 OLED 面板。 2024 Zephyrus G14.两者都支持 HDR500、120 Hz 的原生刷新率、全 P3 色彩和相同的原生 1800p 分辨率。因此,尽管华硕的起售价要高得多,但两款产品的观看体验基本相同。值得注意的是,Blade 14 是三款机型中唯一没有 OLED 或 HDR 配置的机型。
只有启用 HDR 且内容支持 HDR 时,才能达到 500 尼特的最大亮度。否则,普通的 SDR 内容只能达到略低于 400 尼特的亮度。
OLED 显示屏是少数支持 60 Hz 至 120 Hz Windows 动态刷新率的显示屏之一。遗憾的是,它不支持游戏中的 VRR(G-Sync 或 FreeSync)。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 386.3 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.07
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U ATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 TL140ADXP04-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 Samsung SDC ATNA45AF02-2, OLED, 2880x1600, 14.5" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 LQ144P1JX01, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | -5% | 0% | 0% | -21% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.6 | 99.6 0% | 96.9 -3% | 99.9 0% | 99.2 0% | 66.7 -33% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 100 0% | 99 -1% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.1 | 89.9 -6% | 85 -12% | 96.5 0% | 68.9 -28% | |
Response Times | 53% | -668% | -15% | -4716% | -2905% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.86 ? | 0.62 ? 28% | 6 ? -598% | 0.79 ? 8% | 80.8 ? -9295% | 77.6 ? -8923% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.99 ? | 0.68 ? 31% | 8.3 ? -738% | 1.01 ? -2% | 78.8 ? -7860% | 34.3 ? -3365% |
PWM Frequency | 479 ? | 960 ? 100% | 240.5 ? -50% | 14878 ? 3006% | 17600 ? 3574% | |
Screen | 35% | 16% | 1% | 27% | 43% | |
Brightness middle | 386.3 | 423 10% | 484.1 25% | 377.5 -2% | 610 58% | 511 32% |
Brightness | 389 | 424 9% | 466 20% | 381 -2% | 600 54% | 503 29% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 89 -9% | 97 -1% | 96 -2% | 89 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.01 | 0.38 | 0.26 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.03 | 0.7 83% | 2.23 45% | 4.19 -4% | 1.7 58% | 0.5 88% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.69 | 1.8 73% | 4.57 32% | 7.02 -5% | 2.3 66% | 1.1 84% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.07 | 0.74 31% | 0.81 24% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 0.8 33% | 1.6 -33% | 1.2 -0% | 2.1 -75% | 0.8 33% |
Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.18 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 6280 104% | 6505 100% | 6816 95% | 6296 103% | 6874 95% | 6650 98% |
Contrast | 42300 | 1274 | 1965 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 29% /
30% | -219% /
-103% | -5% /
-3% | -1563% /
-1399% | -961% /
-710% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示器根据 P3 标准进行了预校准,灰度平均 deltaE 值仅为 1.2,非常出色,而色彩平均 deltaE 值则略高,为 4.03。我们使用 X-Rite 色差计将色彩平均值降至 1.07,校准后的 ICM 配置文件可在上面免费下载。不过,对于绝大多数用户来说,最终用户校准并不是必需的。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.99 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.46 ms rise | |
↘ 0.53 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.86 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.45 ms rise | |
↘ 0.41 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 479 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 479 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 479 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
从 0% 到 100% 的所有亮度级别上都能检测到 479 Hz 的恒定脉宽调制。无论亮度百分比如何,频率都不会改变。
室外能见度与 Zephyrus G14 大致相当,但不如 Blade 14,因为后者采用了哑光面板和更亮的显示屏来减少眩光。该系统可能结构紧凑,便于户外操作,但反射式屏幕并不是为如此明亮的环境光而设计的。
视角:描述实际使用中的视角(对移动使用很重要,在膝上使用? 添加一张照片进行对比(NBC 参考图片,最大显示亮度,暗室,所有照片的光圈和快门速度相同,所有方向 45° 梯度)
表演 - 流星湖 + 艾达-拉芙蕾丝
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和 Omen Gaming Hub 都设置为性能模式,并激活了最大风扇模式。我们建议用户熟悉 Omen Gaming Hub,因为在这里可以找到关键设置,包括实时系统状态、照明、电源和风扇配置文件以及图形切换器。该软件还将数字商店与游戏集成在一起,如果你只想切换一个简单的设置,这可能会让体验变得笨拙。例如,重要的电源和风扇配置文件被隐藏在子菜单中,需要分别点击三次鼠标。软件主屏幕的可定制性不强,而广告则总是出现在屏幕的正中央,令人讨厌。
不支持 MUX;系统只能在 iGPU 模式和混合(Optimus)模式之间切换,没有 dGPU 选项。在两种模式之间切换时需要重启。惠普表示曾考虑过 MUX 切换,但相对于功耗的增加,性能的提升微乎其微。DirectX 跨适配器扫描(CASO)有助于提高 Optimus 模式的性能,使其更接近 MUX 模式。
处理器
处理器的原始性能与 酷睿 i7-13700H的 酷睿至尊 7 155H所取代。酷睿 i7-13700H 的速度并不慢,因为它可以在较大的游戏笔记本电脑上使用,如 Victus 16等大型游戏笔记本电脑上使用的酷睿 i7-13700H 绝对算不上慢,但对于追求性能的用户来说,这款 CPU 可能会让人感觉慢了一步。
新 CPU 的主要亮点在于其集成的 NPU,可用于加速人工智能任务,如 Microsoft Copilot 或用于视频会议的网络摄像头相关功能。利用 NPU 的最新应用是 OpenVINO,它很快就能将视频流任务从 CPU 或 GPU 卸载到 NPU,并在此过程中将平均帧速率提高 25% 至 35%。即便如此,目前的 NPU 应用仍然非常有限,不适用于绝大多数用户。例如,截至本文撰写时,Copilot 仍完全基于云计算,而 OpenVINO 功能在非流媒体播放器用户中毫无用处。预计到 2025 年及以后,会有更多应用利用 NPU。
性能的可持续性非常出色,性能非常接近 Ryzen 9 8945HS或 Ryzen 7 7840HS在Legion Slim 5 14 或 Blade 14 中的性能非常接近。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=46) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=46) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=46) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=46) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=46) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=46) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=46) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=46) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=46) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=46) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 |
压力测试
HWiNFO 报告称,DTS 和增强型传感器之间的温度差异较大且不稳定,但在下面的截图中还是提供了这两种传感器的温度。无论如何,尽管 CPU 体积小、重量轻,但仍能保持不错的 Turbo Boost 速度,可与 Ryzen 9 8945HS 相媲美。
运行 Witcher 3在性能模式下,打开最大风扇和关闭最大风扇不会显示出太大差异,因为它们的 TGP 值基本保持不变。因此,要想在游戏中发挥系统的最大性能,启用最大风扇并非必要。这些结果与下文 GPU 性能部分中Fire Strike 的结果一致。不过,降至平衡模式会对性能产生轻微影响,TGP 会从 50 W 降至 46 W。
虽然惠普宣传 50 W TGP 外加 15 W 动态提升,但根据 HWiNFO 的数据,无论何种游戏,GPU 功耗最高仍为 50 W。相比之下,同样的 RTX 4060 GPU 在 Legion Slim 5 14将达到 98 W。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 46 | 39 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.9 - 3.0 | -- | 84 | 48 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.4 - 2.5 | 570 - 1680 | 86 | 52 - 65 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式,关闭最大风扇) | ~2.0 | 2100 | 77+ | 63 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式,最大风扇打开) | ~2.0 | 1995 | ~97 | 61 |
系统性能
PCMark 10 分数略低于竞争对手,如 Surface Laptop Studio 2或联想Legion Slim 5 14 等竞争对手略低,部分原因是我们的 Omen Transcend 14 的 TGP 目标较低。不过,值得注意的是,惠普机型集成了速度非常快的 7467 MHz LPDDR5x 内存,而其他大多数笔记本电脑的内存运行速度为 6400 MHz 或更慢。因此,AIDA 内存基准测试结果明显快于同类 14 英寸系统。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (6751 - 7370, n=5) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9476 - 10446, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (8079 - 9477, n=5) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9811 - 11620, n=5) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1540 - 1746, n=5) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1436 - 1684, n=5) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1811 - 1929, n=5) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1165 - 1631, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (274 - 290, n=5) | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (236 - 262, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (519 - 585, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6962 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=46) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=46) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=46) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (116.2 - 233, n=46) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开主页的多个浏览器标签时,LatencyMon 显示出轻微的 DPC 问题。此外,以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频也非常完美,在启动 Microsoft Snippet 工具时,仅在视频末尾记录到两个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配有 1 TB WDC PC SN810PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘,没有空间安装辅助选件。在循环运行 DiskSpd 时,最大传输速率稳定在约 7000 MB/s,表明没有重大节流问题。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能 - 50 WGeForce RTX 图形处理器
Omen Transcend 14 是为数不多的采用 50 W TGP 的低功耗笔记本电脑之一。 GeForce RTX 4060额外的 15 瓦动态提升(50 瓦 + 15 瓦)。因此,尽管我们的机型采用了与 Blade 14、Legion Slim 5 14 或 2024 Zephyrus G14 相同的 GPU 选项,但这些替代品以更高的 TGP 目标运行,以获得更高的性能。例如,联想系统的图形性能比惠普快 30% 至 35%,因为其 RTX 4060 的目标 TGP 为 105 W。即使是 Yoga Pro 9的 RTX 4050也能在很多方面与我们的 RTX 4060 相媲美。
在 Blender 上进行渲染时,CUDA 加速仅比我们数据库中的 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑平均慢 10%,这比上述 3DMark 差异要小得多。因此,惠普系统可以成为更好的编辑和内容创作设备,而不是纯粹的游戏设备。
升级到 RTX 4070预计性能仅会提高 10%至 15%,而降至 RTX 4050 预计性能会降低约 15%至 20%。
电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式(最大风扇开启 | 20867 | 26559 | 9624 |
性能模式(最大风扇关闭 | 20566 (-1%) | 26455 (-0%) | 9526 (-1%) |
平衡模式 | 19100 (-9%) | 25431 (-4%) | 7277 (-24%) |
电池电量 | 18522 (-11%) | 24240 (-9%) | 7508 (-22%) |
请注意,如Fire Strike 上表所示,最大风扇模式对整体性能几乎没有影响。不过,降至平衡模式或电池供电模式会对性能产生较大影响。
3DMark 11 Performance | 26486 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 19238 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 8131 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
所有游戏在 1800p 显示屏上都能很好地运行,包括《赛博朋克 2077》或《博德之门 3 》等要求较高的游戏,尽管 RTX 4060 的性能比通常要慢。不过,我们建议将设置调低到中低档,并在可用时启用 DLSS,以达到 60 FPS 的目标。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 170.2 | 165.2 | 155.2 | 96.7 | 74 | 68.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 340.1 | 261.8 | 149.9 | 80.2 | 50.6 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 149.8 | 134.9 | 129.5 | 121.1 | 106.2 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 165 | 116 | 83.2 | 60.1 | 32.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 116.5 | 102.2 | 79.5 | 68.4 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 145 | 121 | 114 | 107 | 80 | 39 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 367 | 220 | 173.2 | 151.1 | 102 | 54.5 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 164.4 | 131.5 | 86.6 | 67.5 | 45.3 | 21.9 |
F1 22 (2022) | 197.8 | 194.8 | 146.4 | 49 | 31 | 14.8 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 104.2 | 85.2 | 76.6 | 73.2 | 48.9 | 24.8 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 103.5 | 77.7 | 65.2 | 56.7 | 32.9 | 13.8 |
排放量
系统噪音
风扇的行为和噪音与 Omen Gaming Hub 软件中的电源配置文件直接相关。如果使用 iGPU 模式和平衡配置文件,风扇会出色地长时间保持安静,甚至在 3DMark 06 的第一个基准测试场景中也是如此。但如果使用 dGPU 和性能模式,无论屏幕负载如何,风扇噪音都会徘徊在 29 至 31 dB(A) 之间。如果你对静音风扇情有独钟,最好还是使用 iGPU 模式。
关闭最大风扇时,游戏时的风扇噪音为 47 分贝(A),打开最大风扇时为 52 分贝(A)。这个范围与我们在 Blade 14 或 Zephyrus G14 上记录到的噪音相当,这意味着尽管 Omen Transcend 14 的 TGP 目标值较低,但它在游戏时的噪音并不明显。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.7 / 24.7 / 24.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 25.2 / 52 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.5 dB(A) |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | -5% | -14% | 9% | -15% | |
off / environment * | 24.5 | 23.9 2% | 24.3 1% | 22.8 7% | 24.1 2% | 23.9 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 23.9 3% | 25 -1% | 22.8 8% | 24.1 2% | 23.9 3% |
Idle Average * | 24.7 | 23.9 3% | 25 -1% | 27.3 -11% | 24.1 2% | 24.4 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.7 | 23.9 3% | 25 -1% | 30.7 -24% | 24.1 2% | 26.9 -9% |
Load Average * | 25.2 | 46.2 -83% | 33 -31% | 41.6 -65% | 25.1 -0% | 48.5 -92% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 47 | 46.2 2% | 49.5 -5% | 52.8 -12% | 25.1 47% | 51.8 -10% |
Load Maximum * | 52 | 46.2 11% | 51.9 -0% | 52.6 -1% | 49.4 5% | 51.8 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
键盘中心的表面温度最高,顶部和底部的热点温度分别可达 40 摄氏度和 35 摄氏度。对于如此小巧的机箱设计来说,最高温度比我们预期的要低,因为替代品如 雷蛇刀锋 14或华硕 Zephyrus G14 的两侧温度可达 40 摄氏度中上水平。在游戏时,掌托不会感到不舒服的温度。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -12% | -22% | -13% | 6% | -4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.2 | 46.6 -13% | 41.8 -1% | 40.4 2% | 42 -2% | 40.4 2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 39 | 47.8 -23% | 42.2 -8% | 49.4 -27% | 38.3 2% | 42.2 -8% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.2 | 26.7 -2% | 34.8 -33% | 28.2 -8% | 23 12% | 26.6 -2% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.4 | 27.8 -9% | 37.4 -47% | 29.8 -17% | 22.8 10% | 27 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 无需专用交流适配器
耗电量
运行 Witcher 3功耗约为 118 瓦,与 Zephyrus G14但仍远低于 Blade 14。Omen Transcend 14 和 Blade 14 的功耗相差约 60 瓦,其中大部分归因于较重的 Razer 系统的 TGP 目标更高。
惠普、雷泽和华硕机型之间的一个重要区别是,惠普使用的是通用型(约 13.8 x 6.5 x 2.8 厘米)140 W USB-C 交流适配器,而雷泽和华硕机型则分别有自己专有的 240 W 和 180 W 解决方案。这意味着,如果您需要第二个交流适配器,惠普的交流适配器可以很容易、更便宜地更换,但与竞争对手相比,其较低的功率输出限制了 GPU 性能。
(编者注:当我们的 Metrahit Energy 万用表维修完毕后,我们将更新本节内容。不便之处,敬请谅解。)
Off / Standby | 0.37 / 0.82 Watt |
Idle | 9.1 / 12.6 / 27.4 Watt |
Load |
63.5 / 135.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, OLED, 2880x1600, 14.5" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 16% | -64% | 2% | 43% | 30% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9.1 | 6.9 24% | 20.9 -130% | 7.3 20% | 2.3 75% | 3 67% |
Idle Average * | 12.6 | 8.6 32% | 25.6 -103% | 9.6 24% | 13.1 -4% | 7.1 44% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.4 | 9 67% | 32.1 -17% | 17.3 37% | 13.3 51% | 7.6 72% |
Load Average * | 63.5 | 75.2 -18% | 72.7 -14% | 76.6 -21% | 47.4 25% | 73.1 -15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 118.9 | 109.7 8% | 182.1 -53% | 152 -28% | 42.8 64% | 113.9 4% |
Load Maximum * | 135.3 | 161.6 -19% | 228.4 -69% | 160.9 -19% | 73.6 46% | 128.5 5% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
惠普建议通过 BIOS 启用 Direct X 跨适配器扫描(CASO)以延长电池寿命。在禁用和启用该功能的情况下,我们分别记录了 423 分钟和 517 分钟的 WLAN 运行时间,这表明切换 CASO 会对运行时间产生明显影响。惠普表示,将很快为用户提供软件更新,默认启用 CASO。不过,为了延长电池使用时间,建议在 iGPU 模式下运行并激活动态刷新率。
使用随附的交流适配器从空电状态充至满电状态大约需要 90 分钟。
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 71 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Lenovo Legion Slim 5 14APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73.6 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, 72.6 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 58 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 2% | -10% | 3% | 53% | 48% | |
Reader / Idle | 622 | 480 -23% | 629 1% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 517 | 555 7% | 428 -17% | 448 -13% | 979 89% | 498 -4% |
Load | 66 | 64 -3% | 72 9% | 80 21% | 77 17% | 132 100% |
H.264 | 725 | 1213 | 675 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 性能与价格的完美平衡
在 14 英寸游戏笔记本电脑市场上,用户不可避免地会将惠普 Omen Transcend 14 与该类笔记本电脑中的两款顶级产品进行比较:Razer Blade 14 和 HP Omen 14。 雷蛇刀锋 14和 华硕 Zephyrus G14.惠普最大、最值得一提的优势可能就是起售价比这两款产品低得多,同时还提供类似GeForce RTX 4060 和 4070 的选项,以及高质量 120 Hz DCI-P3 OLED 显示屏。尽管系统成本低了数百美元,但规格和尺寸并没有降低。
惠普的最大缺点是 TGP 目标值较低,仅为 50 至 65 W,而上述华硕和雷蛇分别为 90 W 和 140 W。因此,如果将这三个系统配置为相同的GeForce RTX 4060 GPU,惠普的 GPU 性能会下降一个档次,更像是 RTX 4050。这并不是说该系统速度慢,但性能猎奇者可能会因此对惠普望而却步。
首款 14 英寸 Omen 笔记本电脑在外观、规格和价格方面都做得很好。它明显比竞争对手便宜,但性能却稍逊一筹。
另一个症结是惠普的铰链,当然可以做得更硬一些。从这个角度看,Blade 14 和 Zephyrus G14 的做工更好。
尽管存在一些不足,但与竞争对手相比,Omen Transcend 14 的价格还是比较公道的。GeForce RTX 显卡、高质量的显示屏和便于旅行的尺寸,与雷蛇或华硕的产品一样。不过,我们建议您小心铰链。
价格和供应情况
百思买(Best Buy)目前正在出货本次评测中配置的 Omen Transcend 14,售价为 1700 美元,而酷睿 Ultra 9 185H 和 RTX 4070 配置的零售价为 2000 美元。
HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014
- 03/05/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.