联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 14 笔记本电脑评测：配备 OLED 显示屏的成功全能型产品
IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 是一款多功能、超薄、轻便且功能强大的笔记本电脑。这款 14 英寸设备的售价约为 1,000 美元，配备了 Core Ultra 5 125H、16 GB LPDDR5x-7467 内存（不可扩展）和 512GB NVMe 固态硬盘。在屏幕方面，这款笔记本电脑采用反射式 60-Hz 16:10 OLED 显示屏（1920 x 1200 像素），全面覆盖 DCI-P3。Windows 11 家庭版操作系统使整套配置更加完善。
IdeaPad Slim 5 的竞争对手包括其他采用流星湖处理器的 14 英寸笔记本电脑，如 华硕 ZenBook 14和 惠普 Spectre x360或 Yoga Pro 7我们已经测试过同一制造商的 AMD 变体.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.6 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.5 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.6 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
| 88.6 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
| 86.7 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 91.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
案例
这款笔记本电脑的外壳看起来相当不错。首先，它设计时尚，体积小巧--尽管竞争对手在这些方面提供了类似的价值。1.4 千克的适中重量也让你没有理由抱怨，这意味着你仍然可以舒适地随身携带这款 14 英寸的设备。除了一些小细节外，它的稳定性和制造质量也很不错。
它的铰链既不会太松也不会太硬；单手就可以打开设备，不过在打开过程中底座有时会有些摆动。由于颜色较浅，几乎看不到指纹痕迹。其最大开启角度为 160°。
连接性
端口
该设备的端口仍有改进的余地。虽然这款 14 英寸笔记本电脑总共有 4 个 USB 端口，但即使是两个 Type-C 端口也只符合 3.2 Gen 1 标准，不过它们支持 DisplayPort 1.4 和 Power Delivery 3.0。此外，还有一个音频插孔、一个过时的 HDMI 1.4b 端口和一个 microSD 读卡器。由于端口位于两个侧板的后半部，因此使用外接鼠标不会有（空间）困难。
SD 读卡器
在我们的测试中，上述读卡器的连续读取速度达到了略低于 90 MB/s 的稳定性能。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years) | |
交流
在无线局域网性能方面，这款笔记本电脑也没有让人感到意外。在距离我们的参考路由器一米远的地方，安装的英特尔模块（Wi-Fi 6E AX211）提供了相当不错的性能，有时甚至与竞争对手的性能相当。
网络摄像头
它的网络摄像头质量略高于笔记本电脑的标准，但令人遗憾的是，它的质量很差。2 百万像素的摄像头看起来比许多竞争产品更清晰，不过它还是没能像往常一样提供良好的色彩准确度。
配件
联想在提供笔记本电脑的同时，还提供了一些信息手册和一个小巧的 65 瓦电源（USB C）。
维护
其维护选项与 Yoga Pro 7 非常相似。这意味着它的底板由 6 个 Torx 螺钉和几个支架固定。与它的 14 英寸兄弟产品相比，联想没有采用双风扇散热装置，而是依靠一个相对较大的风扇。WLAN 模块和固态硬盘被一层薄膜覆盖。遗憾的是，内存是焊接上去的。
保修
笔记本电脑享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。
输入设备
键盘
与 Yoga Pro 7 一样，IdeaPad Slim 5 的输入设备也值得称赞。它的键盘布局合理（除了中间的方向键较小外），按键大小适中。与大多数其他厂商的键盘相比，IdeaPad Slim 5 的键入手感更好，不过对于一款经典的橡胶圆顶键盘来说，按键噪音还是比较大的。由于安装了白色背光，夜间书写也不成问题。
触摸板
它的触摸板也很不错--如果你忽略了听起来略显粗糙的点击区域的话。对于一款 14 英寸设备来说，12 x 7.5 厘米的尺寸是值得尊敬的。在我们的测试中，它在精度或手势支持方面从未出现过任何问题。它的表面相当光滑，这意味着手指可以很好地在上面滑动。
显示屏
说到 OLED 显示屏，人们的品味各不相同。如果你想长时间在明亮的室内或室外使用笔记本电脑，那么你最好选择哑光表面的设备。我们测试配置的眩光表面经常会造成非常强烈和令人不快的反光。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 392 cd/m²
Contrast: 19600:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.75 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.59
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.249
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 LENOVO LEN140WUXGA (LEN88AC), OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Lenovo LEN145-3K (LEN8AAF), IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 LEN145WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA ATNA40CU06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | -17% | 0% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 98.4 -2% | 72.3 -28% | 99.8 0% | 99.8 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.7 | 86.9 -10% | 73.4 -24% | 97.6 1% | 89.3 -8% |
| Response Times | -1812% | -2752% | 63% | 59% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.3 ? | 34.1 ? -2523% | 43.6 ? -3254% | 0.69 ? 47% | 0.77 ? 41% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1.2 ? | 14.4 ? -1100% | 28.2 ? -2250% | 0.71 ? 41% | 0.75 ? 37% |
| PWM Frequency | 240 | 480 ? 100% | 480 100% | ||
| Screen | -174% | -127% | 14% | 12% | |
| Brightness middle | 392 | 464 18% | 357 -9% | 391 0% | 378 -4% |
| Brightness | 388 | 456 18% | 348 -10% | 392 1% | 384 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 90 -7% | 88 -9% | 98 1% | 97 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.02 | 0.36 -1700% | 0.22 -1000% | 0.02 -0% | |
| Contrast | 19600 | 1289 -93% | 1623 -92% | 19550 0% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.75 | 0.9 49% | 2 -14% | 1.1 37% | 1.4 20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.46 | 2.32 48% | 3.8 15% | 2.4 46% | 2.2 51% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.59 | 0.35 78% | 1.2 25% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 1.4 22% | 2.7 -50% | 1.3 28% | 1.7 6% |
| Gamma | 2.249 98% | 2.218 99% | 2.15 102% | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 6574 99% | 6669 97% | 6929 94% | 6336 103% | 6256 104% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -663% /
-372% | -965% /
-479% | 26% /
22% | 23% /
20% |
* ... smaller is better
除此之外，OLED 屏幕在很大程度上是成功的。Slim 5 的黑度值低得惊人（几乎为 0 cd/m²），因此能呈现出传统 IPS 面板梦寐以求的惊人对比度。它的可视角度也令人印象深刻。
其响应时间也是如此，即使要求苛刻的用户也会感到满意。其他亮点还包括其丰富的色彩空间覆盖范围（约 100% 的 DCI-P3 和 AdobeRGB）以及开箱即用的高色彩准确度。
眼睛有问题的人可能需要做出一些牺牲。与 OLED 的典型特点一样，屏幕闪烁的频率相对较低。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
IdeaPad Slim 5 是一款中档笔记本电脑。用户应事先慎重考虑 16GB 内存从长远来看是否够用，因为正如之前所批评的那样，它不能更换。它的 M.2 固态硬盘（也只有 2242 型号）在技术上可以换成更大的 2280 型号。
测试条件
联想 Vantage 软件中隐藏了三种能源和性能模式，从节省电池模式到最高性能模式。我们的测量都是在智能冷却模式下进行的。
| Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) 省电 | 模式 | 智能冷却 | 最高性能 |
| 噪音 | 33 dB(A) 40 dB(A) 42 dB(A) | ||
| 性能 | 14-24 帧/秒 26 帧/秒 26 帧/秒 |
处理器
Core Ultra 5 125H 是 Core Ultra 7 155H 的廉价兄弟。 酷睿至尊 7 155H它可以处理 18 个并行线程，而不是 22 个。它的时钟频率和缓存（18 MB 对 24 MB）也略低。即便如此，在我们的基准测试中，Ultra 5 125H 的表现还是相当不错的。虽然这还不足以让它达到 Yoga Pro 7 的水平，但其他基于 155H 的笔记本电脑，如 ZenBook 14 或 Spectre x360，在 Cinebench 循环测试中也无法超越它。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (8430 - 13639, n=6) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (43652 - 70880, n=6) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (2047 - 3404, n=6) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (77892 - 79986, n=6) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (6588 - 7851, n=6) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (21210 - 35321, n=6) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (45524 - 108402, n=6) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (594 - 994, n=6) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (4345 - 7221, n=6) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (45724 - 49844, n=6) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
系统性能
它的系统性能也不差。在 PCMark 10 中获得了 6359 分的好成绩，尽管这款笔记本电脑的竞争对手一般都差不了多少。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU (6194 - 6463, n=6) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU (9427 - 10697, n=6) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU (7042 - 8000, n=6) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU (8198 - 9506, n=6) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU (1522 - 1633, n=5) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU (1432 - 1594, n=5) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU (1683 - 1765, n=5) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU (1171 - 1520, n=5) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU (245 - 263, n=6) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU (227 - 240, n=5) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU (560 - 595, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6359 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (67482 - 87473, n=6) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (70520 - 76803, n=6) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117898, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (63162 - 72443, n=6) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (127.3 - 184.8, n=6) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=59, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 工具没有发现 Slim 5 在实时音频和视频处理方面有任何潜在问题。这在其他设备上并不常见。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
笔记本电脑的存储设备没有完全达到最佳工作状态。根据我们的 Loop 测试，长时间负载会导致速度暂时下降。总的来说，SK Hynix 制造的 M.2 硬盘性能相当不错，对大多数用户来说已经足够。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
酷睿至尊 5 125H 集成的 iGPU 被称为 Arc 7与 弧 8相比，Arc 7 的 Xe 向量引擎数量从 128 个减少到 112 个，光线追踪单元/采样器数量从 8 个减少到 7 个，但减少的幅度并不大。不出所料，IdeadPad Slim 5 能够很好地跟上基于 Ultra 7 155H 的设备，（至少在合成图形基准测试中）它仅领先于 Radeon 780M仅次于 Yoga Pro 7 的 Radeon 780M。如果你想偶尔玩玩游戏，那么使用 Arc 8 可能会更好，因为我们测试的几款游戏（在驱动程序相同的情况下）比其他游戏更容易崩溃--至少在使用更高的设置时是这样，但即便如此，这些游戏还是无法玩下去。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 -1! | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA -1! | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng -1! | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 42252 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 41299 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12140 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 154153 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 30553 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7929 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3658 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
只要不过分追求分辨率（最高全高清），并满足中低设置，Arc 7 也适用于某些现代游戏。当尝试运行要求极高和/或中等优化的游戏时，情况就会变得紧张，如Alan Wake 2,Starfield,Lords of The Fallen,Avatar Frontiers of Pandora 和 Enshrouded 。在这种情况下，您将不可避免地不得不使用高清范围内的较低分辨率或英特尔 XeSS 形式的升频（如果游戏支持）。如果将其游戏性能与 Yoga Pro 7 进行比较，Radeon 780M 平均快 10%左右，而 Arc 8 则快近 20%。
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU (18.3 - 26, n=3) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU (12.7 - 16.6, n=6) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Palworld | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:TSR | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (34.8 - 81.5, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU () | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:TSR | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (32.6 - 62.3, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:TSR | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (17.3 - 36.2, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| Helldivers 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (19.2 - 41.6, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14.7 - 31.9, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (12.9 - 30.1, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| Enshrouded | |
| 1920x1080 Performance | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11.4 - 27, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 Balanced AA:FX | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10.5 - 22.9, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 Quality AA:FX | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8.34 - 20.3, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown | |
| 1920x1080 Normal Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (129.5 - 215, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (93.1 - 168.4, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| Last Epoch | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.8 - 73.9, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (32.1 - 52.4, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU () | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (25.1 - 46.4, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU () | |
积极的一面在长期测试中，我们使用 的Witcher 3(约 1 小时@全高清/超高清）进行的长期测试中，其帧速率保持良好稳定。而华硕 ZenBook 14 和惠普 Spectre x360 则出现了巨大的波动。
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 153 | 151.6 | 34.1 | 13.7 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 138 | 88 | 52 | 26 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 93.5 | 70.5 | 75.8 | 73 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 64.8 | 35.8 | 25.3 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 47.1 | 38.3 | 31.3 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 74 | 41 | 37 | 35 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 149 | 69.5 | 57.7 | 47.3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 31.6 | 27 | 22.6 | 21.6 |
| Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 31 | 26.5 | 17.3 | 13.2 |
| Returnal (2023) | 30 | 29 | 27 | 23 |
| Atomic Heart (2023) | 40.7 | 31.9 | 22.8 | 16.4 |
| Company of Heroes 3 (2023) | 51.5 | 45.4 | 33.9 | 33.3 |
| Sons of the Forest (2023) | 24.9 | 17.3 | 15.5 | 15.2 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023) | 36.1 | 25.1 | 23.6 | 0 () |
| F1 23 (2023) | 68 | 60 | 40 | 0 () |
| Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) |
| Atlas Fallen (2023) | 40.5 | 40.3 | 36.6 | 26.4 |
| Armored Core 6 (2023) | 39.7 | 32.6 | 28.5 | 23.5 |
| Starfield (2023) | 19.1 | 16.5 | 13.2 | 10.7 |
| The Crew Motorfest (2023) | 26 | 24 | 20 | 17 |
| Lies of P (2023) | 46 | 33.8 | 32.6 | 27.1 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 30.2 | 26.4 | 22.8 | 21.8 |
| Counter-Strike 2 (2023) | 90.2 | 57.9 | 37.6 | 24.7 |
| Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 33 | 31 | 27 | 0 () |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 95.5 | 56.8 | 35.6 | 28.1 |
| Lords of the Fallen (2023) | 17.1 | 11.7 | 11.4 | 10.8 |
| Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 15.8 | 0 () | 0 () | |
| EA Sports WRC (2023) | 28.6 | 21 | 19.2 | 17.9 |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 15 | 14 | 12 | 9 |
| The Finals (2023) | 70 | 47.7 | 39.7 | 34.6 |
| Ready or Not (2023) | 62.7 | 48.3 | 44.5 | 34.5 |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 215 | 127 | 120 | |
| Palworld (2024) | 34.8 | 32.6 | 25.2 | 23.4 |
| Enshrouded (2024) | 21.5 | 18 | 0 () | 0 () |
| Helldivers 2 (2024) | 32.1 | 25 | 22.7 | 21.7 |
| Skull & Bones (2024) | 33 | 31 | 24 | 18 |
| Last Epoch (2024) | 53.8 | 38.7 | 33 | 25.3 |
排放量
噪音排放
这款笔记本电脑的噪音表现尚可，但并不出众。在空闲模式下，以及在完成办公、播放视频和上网等简单任务时，其噪音排放在 30 分贝（A）左右，表现尚可。不过，在负载情况下，这款 14 英寸设备的噪音比竞争对手 Arc 8 要大，尽管性能较弱，但 40-45 dB（A）的噪音还是可以接受的。如果你想要更安静的声音，那么你可能需要使用省电模式，不过这样一来，笔记本电脑的性能就会受到严重限制。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 26 / 31 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 43 / 45 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | 4% | 10% | 18% | |
| off / environment * | 24 | 24 -0% | 24.3 -1% | 23.4 2% | 23.4 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 25 -0% | 24.3 3% | 23.4 6% | 23.4 6% |
| Idle Average * | 26 | 27 -4% | 24.3 7% | 23.4 10% | 23.4 10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31 | 30 3% | 27.9 10% | 24.5 21% | 25.6 17% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 36 16% | 36.7 15% | 39.3 9% | 25.6 40% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40 | 38 5% | 44.2 -11% | 35.9 10% | 30.9 23% |
| Load Maximum * | 45 | 38 16% | 44.2 2% | 39.3 13% | 32.6 28% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
其机箱温度与竞争对手的机箱温度相似。在空闲模式下，它的机箱温度很低（顶部 25 °C，底部 26 °C），但在负载情况下，我们测得的峰值高达 43 °C（顶部）和 48 °C（底部），这还是可以接受的。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 5% | -1% | 6% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 43 | 43 -0% | 42.1 2% | 40.9 5% | 39.3 9% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 48 | 42 12% | 49.7 -4% | 46.8 2% | 45 6% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26 | 25 4% | 25.7 1% | 24.1 7% | 23.8 8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27 | 26 4% | 27.3 -1% | 24.6 9% | 24 11% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试没有发现任何令人不安的意外。虽然酷睿至尊 5 125H 一开始就达到了 100 °C，但很快就平衡到了 80 °C。我们使用Witcher 3 进行的游戏测试也得出了类似的数值（见截图）。
发言人
与扬声器相当出色的 Yoga Pro 7 相比，IdeaPad Slim 5 的音质明显较差。根据我们的音频分析，它的低音特别弱，所以你应该连接耳机或外置音响系统，才能充分享受媒体。
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
耗电量
联想还可以在功耗方面稍作改进。在空闲模式下，这款 14 英寸设备的耗电量比大多数 Arc 8 笔记本电脑都要高，即 5-16 瓦。在负载情况下，其耗电量达到 48-70 瓦，与华硕 ZenBook 14 相近。
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / Watt |
| Idle | 5 / 8 / 16 Watt |
| Load |
53 / 70 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -1% | -14% | 1% | 33% | 14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5 | 4 20% | 5.6 -12% | 6.1 -22% | 3.2 36% | 4.47 ? 11% |
| Idle Average * | 8 | 5.5 31% | 8.8 -10% | 10 -25% | 4.2 47% | 7.6 ? 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 16 | 11.8 26% | 9 44% | 10.3 36% | 4.9 69% | 9.51 ? 41% |
| Load Average * | 53 | 66 -25% | 58.5 -10% | 53.3 -1% | 40.5 24% | 46.2 ? 13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.7 | 55 -15% | 71 -49% | 42 12% | 37.9 21% | |
| Load Maximum * | 70 | 100 -43% | 100.6 -44% | 67 4% | 68.6 2% | 68.4 ? 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
竞争对手的电池容量为 68-75 瓦时，而 IdeaPad Slim 5 仅为 57 瓦时，运行时间不足。虽然电池容量一般，而且耗电量也不理想（插电状态下），但在亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 的情况下，仅用不到 9 小时的时间上网冲浪还是值得尊敬的。
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, 57 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 73 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 73 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 68 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 25% | 14% | 30% | 2% | 33% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 544 | 680 25% | 618 14% | 707 30% | 555 2% | 726 ? 33% |
| H.264 | 737 | 1010 | 999 | 911 ? | ||
| Load | 86 | 134 | 129 | 115.1 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决
如果你能接受反光显示屏，那么 IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 几乎在所有方面都是一款成功的全能/多媒体笔记本电脑。酷睿 酷睿5 125H的首次亮相在很大程度上是成功的。得益于其 弧形 iGPU英特尔终于赶上了 Radeon 680M和 780M在落后多年之后，英特尔终于赶上了 Radeon 680M 和 780M--尽管如果 AMD 没有安于现状，它可能已经再次领先。
尽管如此，联想的 IdeaPad Slim 5 14 还是做了很多正确的事情。
它的外壳给人留下了高品质的印象，与同价位产品相比，它提供了更好的键盘。它的重量、电池续航时间和排放也几乎没有让你抱怨的理由。另一方面，许多潜在买家可能会因为它的内存是焊接上去的，无法扩展而望而却步。此外，你还得忍受平庸的音效和略显过时的端口选择（没有 Thunderbolt 4，只有 HDMI 1.4b）。
总而言之，这款 14 英寸设备与 "非常好 "的评级擦肩而过，就像 惠普 Spectre x360 14或英特尔/AMD 版的 Yoga Pro 7 14可管理。它的总体评分与 ZenBook 14华硕的 ZenBook 14 更为相似，后者（也）更贵。
价格和供应情况
在撰写本文时，搭载 Core Ultra 5 125H 的联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 尚未在美国上市。它的零售价可能在 1,000 美元左右。
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9
- 03/13/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
