惠普 Spectre x360 14 评测--配备更大的 120-Hz OLED 的高端可折叠设备
多年来,惠普的 Spectre x360 系列一直是市场上最好但也是最昂贵的消费类可转换笔记本电脑之一。惠普迄今为止一直使用的是 13.5 英寸显示屏,而 2024 年的机型则采用了更大的 14 英寸机型,OLED 显示屏的运行频率也达到了 120 Hz。此外,还配备了英特尔全新的 Meteor Lake 处理器和 Wi-Fi 7。
我们测试配置的 Spectre x360 14(eu0078ng)市场售价为 1899 欧元(约合 2047 美元)起。除了前面提到的 120 Hz 的 2.8K OLED 面板外,它还配备了新的英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 及其集成 Arc 显卡(8 核),以及 32 GB 内存和 2 TB PCIe 固态硬盘。此外,包装盒中还包括一支有源输入笔和一个带有额外连接的小型扩展坞。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
91.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.3 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.25 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 1.4 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.1 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 17 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - Spectre 配有灰色或蓝色铝质外壳
惠普继续为 Spectre x360 使用高品质的铝制外壳(灰色或蓝色),但设计有了相当大的变化。整个敞篷机变得更加棱角分明。现在的设计元素比 2022er 机型例如,它缺少了周围的装饰条。背面的抛光切角依然存在,但与惠普的徽标一起,成为唯一的对比元素。这使得新款 Spectre 看起来不那么俏皮。
外壳的质量非常高,给 Spectre 带来了非常高品质的外观。此外,炫酷的金属表面也起到了很好的防指纹作用。虽然使用一段时间后仍能看到一些指纹,但表面很容易清洁。这款可转换机还非常坚固。惠普并没有试图打造市场上最薄的设备,这一点绝对有帮助。一切都给人坚固耐用的感觉。铰链也给人留下了良好的印象,在移动设备后仅允许有轻微的晃动。不过,这也意味着单手很难抬起显示屏盖。底座和显示屏盖都非常坚固。附带的触控笔可通过磁力吸附在机壳右侧。
虽然 14 英寸机型的占地面积非常相似,但与旧款 Spectre x36013.5 英寸显示屏相比,新机型略宽一些。重量为 1.45 千克(约 3.2 磅),65 瓦充电器又增加了 310 克(约 11 盎司)。
设备 - Thunderbolt 4,但不再有读卡器
端口继续布置在两侧的背面,斜角处也用于连接。除了两个 USB-C 端口,Spectre 还提供了一个普通的 USB-A 端口,使用时必须翻下一个小盖子。虽然这个盖子看起来不是很结实,但至少通过这种方式,惠普可以在纤薄的底座上安装一个 USB-A 端口。令人惊讶的是,前代产品的 microSD 读卡器被取消了。
新增了一个可通过 USB-C 接口连接的小型扩展坞。由于扩展坞也提供一个 USB-C 端口,因此,如果您愿意,可以将扩展坞连接到电源线和设备之间。通过扩展坞,您可以为 Spectre x360 14 增加两个 USB-A 端口和一个 HDMI 端口。
交流
惠普为 Spectre 配备了全新的英特尔 BE200 Wi-Fi 7 模块(320 MHz,2x2),支持最新的 WLAN 标准和蓝牙 5.4。虽然我们目前还没有相应的 Wi-Fi 7 路由器来测试新标准,但使用华硕参考路由器测试的 WLAN 性能非常好且稳定。
Networking | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
网络摄像头
Spectre 在显示屏顶部边框配备了一个 9 百万像素摄像头。它还包括一个快门,可通过 F2 键触发。网络摄像头给人留下了良好的印象,尤其是在图像清晰度方面,而且还有一些可独立于软件使用的工作室效果(模糊效果、眼神接触、跟踪)。此外,惠普还提供了增强照明应用程序,可以在图像上叠加各种灯光(环形、条形等),改善照明效果。
维护
机箱底盖仅用四颗 Torx 螺钉固定。机箱内部有两个风扇,可以更换 WLAN 模块和电池。M.2-2280 固态硬盘也可以更换,尽管它被放置在一个额外的盖子下面,并用三颗飞利浦螺丝固定。
输入设备 - 配备触觉触摸板的 Spectre
深灰色的键盘在很大程度上与前代产品一致,只是在布局上略有变化。电源键现在位于右上角,同时也是指纹传感器。垂直方向键仍然很窄,同时还提供了 Img Up/Down 的辅助功能。整体而言,输入体验非常精确和舒适,但按键敲击的声音相当大,而且变化多端。总的来说,这是一款不错但并不出色的键盘。白色背景照明提供两个亮度级别,但没有自动激活功能。
触摸板也有一些变化,现在惠普使用的是触觉版本。这意味着不再有机械元素,但点击时会有模拟反馈。这样做的好处是所有地方的反馈都很均匀。在测试过程中,触摸板的操作效果非常出色,13.8 x 8.7 厘米(约 5.4 x 3.4 英寸)的面积也为触摸手势提供了足够的空间。
此外,显示屏还支持触摸输入,其准确性也非常不错。包装盒中还包括惠普 MPP 2.0 Tilt Pen 主动输入笔,它可以通过磁力吸附在机身右侧,并通过 USB-C 接口充电。它提供 4,096 级压力,并配有两个替换笔尖。在我们的测试中,这支笔工作稳定。
显示屏 - 2.8K OLED,120 赫兹
新款 Spectre x360 配备康宁大猩猩玻璃的 OLED 触摸屏已增至 14 英寸,分辨率为 2880x1800 像素。此外,其刷新率现在为 120 Hz。这也意味着格式从 3:2 变为 16:10。由于刷新率的提高,主观的图像印象非常好,动作看起来非常流畅。由于响应时间极快,游戏玩家应该也会对这款显示器感到满意。
惠普规定 SDR 的最大亮度为 400 cd/m²,但我们的测量结果平均为 383 cd/m²,因此无法完全确认。0 的黑色值带来了极高的对比度。我们测得的最大 HDR 亮度为 480 cd/m²,仍然略低于 500 cd/m² 的规格。HDR 模式必须手动激活,否则就无法使用色彩配置文件,但这是 Windows 系统的通病。亮度和色温都无法根据周围环境自动调节。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 378 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT AU Optronics B140QAN04.R, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 SDC4160, OLED, 3000x2000, 13.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -12% | 3% | 3% | -2% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.8 | 77.2 -23% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 97.8 -2% | 99.9 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.6 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 89.3 | 77.4 -13% | 98.3 10% | 97.2 9% | 85.9 -4% | 90.8 2% |
Response Times | -5574% | -29% | -29% | -2024% | -141% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.77 ? | 53.5 ? -6848% | 1.04 ? -35% | 1 ? -30% | 16.9 ? -2095% | 1.9 ? -147% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.75 ? | 33 ? -4300% | 0.95 ? -27% | 1 ? -33% | 15.4 ? -1953% | 2.16 ? -188% |
PWM Frequency | 480 | 360 ? -25% | 360 ? -25% | 60.2 ? -87% | ||
Screen | -28% | -34% | -39% | -107% | -45% | |
Brightness middle | 378 | 532.4 41% | 378 0% | 386 2% | 496.7 31% | 351.7 -7% |
Brightness | 384 | 502 31% | 379 -1% | 389 1% | 468 22% | 351 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 91 -6% | 98 1% | 98 1% | 87 -10% | 87 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.48 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.3 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 2.33 -66% | 2.5 -79% | 2.6 -86% | 3.93 -181% | 1.78 -27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.2 | 5.99 -172% | 4.7 -114% | 4.8 -118% | 7.9 -259% | 6.14 -179% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.6 6% | 1.9 -12% | 2.3 -35% | 5.9 -247% | 2.3 -35% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% | 2.2 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.04 108% | 2.11 104% |
CCT | 6256 104% | 6314 103% | 6222 104% | 6121 106% | 7618 85% | 6683 97% |
Contrast | 1109 | 12600 | 7720 | 1656 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.92 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.27 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1871% /
-1032% | -20% /
-24% | -22% /
-26% | -711% /
-427% | -62% /
-57% |
* ... smaller is better
惠普提供多种色彩配置文件,除了标准的本地配置文件外,我们还使用专业的 CalMAN 软件测量了 P3 和 sRGB 的配置文件。虽然在原生配置文件中色彩略微过饱和,但在交付状态下色彩还原已经非常出色。但这在日常操作中不成问题。不过,在 P3 配置文件中,Spectre 的色彩准确度非常高,所有颜色都低于 3 的重要偏差目标。OLED 面板完全覆盖了 P3 和 sRGB 色彩空间。我们无法通过自己的校准来进一步改善色彩再现。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.75 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise | |
↘ 0.35 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.77 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.37 ms rise | |
↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
OLED 面板使用 PWM,但在 95-100% 的亮度范围内几乎无法测量。基本上,亮度在 60% 以下时使用频率为 240 Hz 的直流调光,亮度在 60% 以下时使用频率为 480 Hz 的直流调光。
在室外,尽管 OLED 面板表面会反光,但即使在明亮的环境中也能表现出色。这得益于极高的对比度。当然,应避免阳光直射或光源反射。视角稳定性非常好,但某些特定视角会产生 OLED 典型的蓝色色调。
性能 - 24 瓦流星湖
惠普推出的新款 Spectre x360 14 专门配备了英特尔新款 Meteor Lake 处理器。工作内存为焊接式(16 或 32 GB 内存)。不提供专用显卡。
测试条件
惠普没有提供自己的电源设置,因此只能使用 Windows 的常规电源模式。以下基准测试和测量均在 "最佳性能 "设置下进行。
处理器 - Core Ultra 7 155H
新 酷睿至尊 7 155H(6 个 P 核心、10 个 E 核心、最多 22 个线程)是继 酷睿 i7-13700H的继任者,它现在取代了旧的 P 系列和 H 系列芯片。根据英特尔的说法,它的 TDP 范围在 28 到 115 瓦之间,这当然是一个巨大的范围。在 Spectre x360 14 中,处理器的最大功耗为 64 瓦,持续了几秒钟,然后很快就降到了 24 瓦。因此,基本上 U 系列处理器在这里会更合适,但由于只有两个性能核心,在这里并不具备真正的竞争力。整体性能参差不齐,在单核性能方面,老款 酷睿 i7-1255U在单核性能方面,Spectre x360 13.5 的老款酷睿 i7-1255U 略胜一筹。在多核测试中,酷睿至尊 7 短暂受益于其高功耗限制,但之后性能明显下降,在 Cinebench R15 循环中也可以看到这一点。
在多核测试中 Ryzen 7 7840UAMD Zen4 芯片在单核和多核测试中也都遥遥领先,主要是在没有极高功耗限制的情况下提供了明显更稳定的性能。这再次表明,Meteor Lake 处理器仍然需要消耗大量电能才能保持竞争力。以 24 瓦为例,Ryzen 7 7840U 比酷睿至尊 7 155H 快近 26%。在电池工作状态下,Spectre 的 CPU 性能保持不变。更多 CPU 基准测试 这里查看更多人工智能基准测试。 流星湖分析.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 -2! | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 -3! | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 -2! | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT -2! | |
Average of class Convertible | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=48) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (616 - 18698, n=63, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1815, n=48) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (308 - 1980, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=46) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 7303, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=46) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 781, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2880, n=52) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=48) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 302, n=62, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average of class Convertible (175 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (175 - 381, n=44) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70254, n=46) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (4795 - 5621, n=46) | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=51) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Average of class Convertible (3257 - 14513, n=41, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=48) | |
Average of class Convertible (1216 - 2814, n=42, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=48) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1462 - 1824, n=48) | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average of class Convertible (319 - 2062, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=46) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 22.4, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (37.5 - 79.2, n=45) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4457 - 0.53, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=46) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (468 - 29594, n=63, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=46) | |
Average of class Convertible (2644 - 114033, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=46) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (182 - 4841, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=46) | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=46) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (659 - 16315, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=46) | |
Average of class Convertible (1420 - 61249, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=46) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=46) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1243, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=46) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (254 - 16065, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=46) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Average of class Convertible (5136 - 53406, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
系统性能
Spectre 的主观性能给人的印象非常好,所有输入都能很快执行。基准测试结果基本上也非常好,我们的测试机只在 CrossMark 测试中成绩稍弱。但在测试过程中,我们完全没有遇到任何关于敞篷车的问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=32) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=32) | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=32) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=32) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=32) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (310 - 1912, n=60, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=31) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average of class Convertible (389 - 1790, n=60, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=31) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (252 - 2183, n=60, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=31) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (295 - 1868, n=60, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=32) | |
Average of class Convertible (84.2 - 407, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=27) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average of class Convertible (49.4 - 314, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Convertible (407 - 2676, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=33) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6782 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=46) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Average of class Convertible (16353 - 108544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=46) | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=46) | |
Average of class Convertible (10177 - 117920, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (116.2 - 233, n=46) | |
Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
尽管测试单元的一个驱动程序在我们的标准化延迟测试(上网冲浪、4k YouTube 视频重现和 CPU 负载)中显示出明显的上升趋势,但重要的 "中断到进程延迟 "值却非常低。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
惠普为我们的测试设备配备了 2 TB 版本的 Kioxia XG8,在首次启动系统后,用户仍可使用其中的 1.79 TB。虽然 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘不是市场上速度最快的型号,但其传输速率完全足够。没有任何问题,即使在长时间加载后,其性能也几乎完全稳定。其他固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
新款 Meteor Lake 处理器的最大亮点显然是新的集成显卡,它与 酷睿至尊 7 155H的结合,最快的 8 核心的 Arc iGPU使用。它可以访问工作内存,目前看来这仍然是个问题,因为我们在使用预装驱动程序和英特尔直接提供的当前驱动程序进行游戏时都遇到了麻烦。不过,这不仅是惠普的问题,也是华硕等公司的问题,尽管你可以在系统软件中手动选择 GPU 存储。我们在惠普中没有看到这个选项,但这也应该不是必要的。
在合成基准测试中,Spectre 的性能表现不错,尽管我们已经在测试中使用了更快版本的 Arc iGPU,而且 Spectre 还落后于最快型号的 Radeon 780M.不过,与旧版 Xe Graphics G7(96 EUs)相比,性能几乎翻了一番。
实际上,你目前并不能从中获益多少,因为在游戏时,只能看到部分性能优势,而且 Spectre 还明显被 Radeon 680M/780M这里。此外,某些游戏的 FPS 波动也是个大问题,在我们对 Witcher 3 的测试中也可以清楚地看到 这一点。这使得真正流畅的游戏变得不可能。英特尔公司应该尽快解决这个问题。在电池工作状态下,GPU 性能保持不变。您可以在 我们的技术部分.
3DMark 11 Performance | 10180 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6941 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3204 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Average of class Convertible (607 - 880, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (269 - 2067, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (294 - 692, n=38) |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (10 - 123.3, n=47, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (7.07 - 114.3, n=49, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 147.3 | 139.5 | 36.3 | 15.9 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 120 | 73 | 44 | 20.9 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 99.3 | 71.4 | 70.3 | 66.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 64 | 36 | 24.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 50.3 | 38.3 | 32 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 59 | 36 | 33 | 32 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 165.4 | 71.1 | 58.9 | 35 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 143.6 | 75.9 | 60 | 26.2 |
F1 22 (2022) | 56.2 | 53.9 | 40.9 | 5.09 |
F1 23 (2023) | 72.3 | 62.1 | 40.7 | 11.5 |
排放 - Spectre 始终保持舒适凉爽
噪音水平
惠普在这里使用了带有两个小风扇的冷却系统。最初听起来可能会有问题,但在日常操作中却非常舒适,Spectre 总体而言是一款非常安静的伴侣。虽然两个风扇的开启速度相对较快(可能也是为了补偿处理器的高功率限制),但它们长时间保持在最低转速水平,而且几乎听不到 26 dB(A)的噪音。在执行简单任务时,噪音也保持在这一水平,即使在高负载情况下,噪音也不会真正变得令人讨厌,在压力测试中,噪音约为 30 dB(A),几分钟后最高可达 32.6 dB(A)。总体而言,新款 Spectre 是我们对比组中最安静的设备。我们的测试设备也没有产生任何其他恼人的电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.4 / 23.4 / 25.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 25.6 / 32.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.4 dB(A) |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04 | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT1T02 | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -18% | -23% | -23% | -10% | -6% | |
off / environment * | 23.4 | 24.1 -3% | 23.6 -1% | 24.5 -5% | 23.3 -0% | 23.5 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.4 | 24.3 -4% | 23.6 -1% | 24.5 -5% | 23.3 -0% | 23.5 -0% |
Idle Average * | 23.4 | 24.3 -4% | 23.6 -1% | 24.5 -5% | 23.3 -0% | 23.5 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.6 | 24.3 5% | 24.6 4% | 28.1 -10% | 23.3 9% | 23.5 8% |
Load Average * | 25.6 | 36.3 -42% | 45 -76% | 42.8 -67% | 24 6% | 27 -5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.9 | 44.5 -44% | 45 -46% | 42.8 -39% | 35.6 -15% | 36.2 -17% |
Load Maximum * | 32.6 | 44.5 -37% | 45 -38% | 42.8 -31% | 55.8 -71% | 42.4 -30% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
无论是硬件还是表面温度,我们都没有遇到任何问题。在空闲运行和低负载情况下,金属外壳保持非常凉爽。在负载情况下,由于散热装置位于底座右侧,因此温度会升高,但我们在顶部任何地方测得的温度都没有超过 40 °C(104 °F)。虽然底部的最高温度为 45 °C(113 °F),但平均温度仅为 35 °C(95 °F)左右。因此,这不会对笔记本电脑的使用造成任何限制。在压力测试过程中,处理器仅在几秒钟内使用了 64 瓦,之后就变为稳定的 24 瓦。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-2 °C / -3.6 F).
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -15% | -5% | -8% | 3% | 11% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.3 | 40.8 -4% | 39.7 -1% | 42.3 -8% | 44.2 -12% | 36.4 7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45 | 40 11% | 45.4 -1% | 45.4 -1% | 45.8 -2% | 37 18% |
Idle Upper Side * | 23.8 | 30.4 -28% | 25.7 -8% | 26.2 -10% | 19.6 18% | 20.8 13% |
Idle Bottom * | 24 | 32.8 -37% | 26.4 -10% | 26.6 -11% | 22 8% | 22.6 6% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Spectre x360 14 提供四个扬声器,效果非常好。扬声器的音量非常大,能产生非常强劲的声音,因此通常情况下无需外接扬声器即可使用。扬声器与非常出色的 联想 Yoga 9 14属于目前市场上最好的系统。
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 改进电池寿命
耗电量
新一代 OLED 显示屏似乎在整体上变得更加高效,Spectre x360 14 在闲置状态下的最大功耗仅为 4.9 瓦。当然,暗色背景图片在这里也起了一定作用,如果图片更亮,结果会更高,但这仍然是一个非常不错的成绩。顺便说一句,在我们的测量过程中,120 赫兹模式始终处于激活状态,因为即使切换到 60 赫兹,激活信号模式也始终保持在 120 赫兹。
在负载情况下,我们短暂测量到的最大功率为 68.6 瓦,但这是 65 瓦充电器的限制。如果处理器本身的功耗已经达到 64 瓦,65 瓦充电器的功耗不足也就不足为奇了。不过,由于该值仅维持几秒钟,因此在实际使用中不会产生问题,而且在压力测试期间,功耗很快就会降到 39 瓦左右。
Off / Standby | 0.18 / 0.46 Watt |
Idle | 3.2 / 4.2 / 4.9 Watt |
Load |
40.5 / 68.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, OLED, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -34% | -81% | -46% | -69% | -34% | -76% | -60% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 4.2 -31% | 7.8 -144% | 5.1 -59% | 5.4 -69% | 4 -25% | 5.41 ? -69% | 5.18 ? -62% |
Idle Average * | 4.2 | 6.9 -64% | 9.3 -121% | 8.2 -95% | 9.5 -126% | 4.9 -17% | 8.64 ? -106% | 8.18 ? -95% |
Idle Maximum * | 4.9 | 7.8 -59% | 9.8 -100% | 8.7 -78% | 12.4 -153% | 12.5 -155% | 12.1 ? -147% | 11.1 ? -127% |
Load Average * | 40.5 | 46 -14% | 62.8 -55% | 51.4 -27% | 54.7 -35% | 48.1 -19% | 54.2 ? -34% | 46.8 ? -16% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.9 | 51.9 -37% | 46.5 -23% | 46.3 -22% | 52 -37% | 35.8 6% | ||
Load Maximum * | 68.6 | 68.2 1% | 96 -40% | 64.8 6% | 63.4 8% | 65.2 5% | 85 ? -24% | 67.2 ? 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption With External Monitor
电池寿命
电池容量仅从 66 Wh 略微增加到 68 Wh,但 Spectre x360 14 的续航时间明显更长,也比大多数竞争对手更具优势。另外,我们只能给出 120 Hz 时的数值,而 60 Hz 时的结果应该会更好。在 150 cd/m²(相当于最大亮度的 58%)的 WLAN 测试中,笔记本电脑的续航时间略高于 9 小时,而在全 SDR 亮度下仅为 7.5 小时。在视频测试中,全新的 Meteor Lake 处理器带来了最大的优势,与其他使用全新酷睿 Ultra CPU 的机型一样,我们看到了超过 16.5 小时的优异成绩。不过,在负载情况下,笔记本电脑的续航时间不会超过 2 小时。
在全亮度条件下播放 HDR 视频可略微超过 4 小时。在设备开启状态下,完全充电大约需要 140 分钟,一个多小时后可充满 80% 的电量。
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 68 Wh | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 71 Wh | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 66 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -22% | -29% | -11% | -12% | -5% | -9% | |
H.264 | 999 | 651 -35% | 762 -24% | 765 ? -23% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 555 | 555 0% | 472 -15% | 584 5% | 494 -11% | 481 -13% | 599 ? 8% |
Load | 129 | 73 -43% | 81 -37% | 110 -15% | 114 -12% | 133 3% | 113.1 ? -12% |
Reader / Idle | 1423 | 1324 | 1223 | 1330 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - Spectre x360 是最好的敞篷机之一
在我们看来,新款惠普 Spectre x360 14 是旧款的成功发展,仍然是市场上最好的可折叠笔记本电脑之一。金属外壳保持了其高品质,但看起来不再那么俏皮。在质量和稳定性方面没有任何问题,而且附带的扩展坞至少部分弥补了连接能力有限的问题。此外,惠普的触控笔可以通过磁力吸附在外壳上。新的触觉触摸板效果非常好。
随着新设计的推出,2022 机型的 3:2 显示屏也改为 16:10 格式的 OLED 触摸屏,刷新率提高到 120 Hz。图像质量非常出色,惠普还直接加入了多个色彩配置文件(包括 P3 和 sRGB),因此无需额外校准。但在低亮度水平下,PWM 仍是一个问题,与华硕相比,惠普目前没有提供任何软件解决方案。
新款 Spectre x360 14 是市场上最好的可转换笔记本之一。除了出色的 OLED 显示屏外,它还拥有足够的性能、更长的电池续航时间、出色的外壳、出色的扬声器和丰富的设备。只有新的英特尔 iGPU 在游戏时仍会带来一些问题。
改用 Meteor Lake 处理器后,电池续航时间更长,图形处理性能也有所提升,但游戏时分配的 GPU 存储空间仍存在一些问题。英特尔应立即通过驱动程序更新来解决这一问题(注意,由于存在这些问题,我们降低了游戏性能的分数)。除此之外,与 Raptor Lake 和 AMD 的 Zen4 处理器相比,英特尔处理器的性能令人失望。在低功耗限制下,英特尔芯片的速度实在是太慢了,对于 Spectre 来说,U 系列处理器确实是一个更好的选择,尽管多核性能在这里会更低。但至少,短期的高功率限制不会导致恼人的风扇噪音。惠普在整体散热方面做得非常出色,新款 Spectre 是我们对比组中迄今为止最安静的设备。
不过,采用 AMD 处理器的可转换设备几乎没有,Meteor Lake 处理器的性能对于大多数个人用户来说应该完全够用,这也是事实。另一个缺点是焊接的工作内存,不过我们测试机的 32GB 内存应该也没有问题。Spectre 的售价为 1,900 欧元(约合人民币 2,048 元),这肯定不是什么便宜货,但它的设备是合适的,而且你还能得到一台质量极高的可折叠电脑。最接近的竞争对手可能是联想的Yoga 9 ,价格也不便宜。此外,目前的 Meteor Lake 机型将在几周后上市,我们对它们的表现非常好奇。
价格和供应情况
惠普 Spectre x360 14 与我们的测试机配置相似(除了只有 16 GB 内存),目前在美国有售,售价约为 1,850 美元。其他配置将于 2024 年 3 月 15 日开始发售,起价约为 1,150 美元。
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng
- 02/17/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.