惠普 Envy x360 2 合 1 16 评论:Ryzen 7 8840HS 击败酷睿 7 155U
Envy 系列是惠普的中端产品系列,介于价格较低的Pavilion 系列和价格较高的旗舰产品 Spectre 系列之间。在这种情况下,新款 Envy x360 16 可以看作是经济实惠版的 Spectre x360 16但与 Spectre x360 15 相比,它拥有更强大的选项和更豪华的功能。 Pavilion x360 15.
我们的测试机配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS CPU、集成 Radeon 780M 图形处理器和 120 Hz 1800p OLED 触摸屏,零售价约为 1300 美元。英特尔版本也有配备第 14 代酷睿 Ultra 5 125U 或 Ultra 7 155U 和 1200p IPS 触摸屏的机型,但所有配置都只配备集成显卡。最新的 Envy x360 16 设计有效取代了去年的 Envy x360 15.
竞争对手包括其他 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑,如 联想 Yoga 7 2 合 1 16IML9, 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 360或 LG Gram 2-in-1 16.
更多惠普评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.8 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | HP Envy 16 h0112nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 19.8 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
91.1 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 19.8 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.7 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | 2.1 kg | 16.99 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core | 1.7 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 17.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
表壳 - 光滑银色
骨架由类似的铝质材料和塑料按键组成 Envy x360 15相似的外观和触感。表面坚硬且质量上乘,即使不像 Spectre 的设计那样奢华。在键盘中心向下施压或试图扭转底座时,底座的倾斜度比 Spectre 稍大,但与 Yoga 7 2 合 1 16 英寸笔记本相比,并没有明显的劣势或优势。 Yoga 7 二合一 16IML9.
Envy x360 16 与其较小的同类产品之间的一个显著区别是键盘面板,现在键盘面板的位置低于周围的扬声器网罩和掌托,而 Envy x360 15 或 Spectre x360 16 的键盘面板位置较高。新的美学设计使 Envy x360 16 乍一看更像 "MacBook Pro"。
新机型比即将推出的 Envy x360 15 更厚、更大,而重量却基本保持不变。也许最值得注意的是,Envy x360 16 与更昂贵的 Specture x360 16 在所有三个维度上几乎完全相同,这意味着尽管价格不同,它对旅行的便利性却丝毫不减。
奇怪的是,无论配置如何,新款 Envy 可折叠电脑只有一种颜色可供选择。相比之下,较小的 Envy x360 机型除了通常的银色外,还有一种夜幕黑铝色可供选择。如果有多种颜色可供选择,将有助于在视觉上区分 Envy x360 16 系列的英特尔和 AMD SKU。
连接性 - AMD 没有 Thunderbolt 或 USB4 接口
除了 SD 读卡器,2023 版 Envy x360 15 的所有端口都已恢复。对于这么大的多媒体笔记本电脑来说,没有集成读卡器对于依赖它来传输媒体的摄影师来说是令人失望的。
遗憾的是,新款 Envy 不支持 USB4 和 Thunderbolt,因为两个 USB-C 端口都只有 10 Gbps。因此,用户只能考虑英特尔版本的 Envy x360 16 或升级到 Spectre x360 16 系列,以获得 Thunderbolt 兼容性。
交流
联发科 MT7922 标配 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3 连接。在 Wi-Fi 6 和 Wi-Fi 6E 测试中,我们都体验到了出色的传输速率,而且没有出现任何连接问题。
网络摄像头
虽然惠普宣传其网络摄像头为 500 万像素,但 Windows 摄像头应用程序却只允许使用 370 万像素,如右侧截图所示。我们已经联系了惠普公司,以了解该摄像头是否能正常工作,或者是否存在漏洞。
红外和物理隐私快门均为标配。
维护
底部面板仅由四颗 Torx 螺钉固定。然而,拆卸起来却完全是另外一回事,因为边缘锋利且非常紧,导致维修困难重重。我们在 Envy x360 15 上也遇到了同样的问题,这说明惠普在 Envy x360 16 的设计上并没有在这方面进行改进。由于内存都是焊接的,所以在内部也没有什么可升级的地方。
配件和保修
可选配有源触控笔。如果在美国购买,制造商提供标准的一年有限保修服务。
输入设备 - 宽敞舒适
键盘
触摸板
点击板比 Spectre x360 16 上的小一些(13.5 x 8.8 厘米对 16 x 10 厘米)。即便如此,它仍然给人宽敞的感觉,即使对于 16 英寸的机型来说也足够大。在较慢的速度下滑行时,牵引力平稳,只有一点粘滞感,而点击时的反馈则有点软,可以更硬一些。
显示屏 - 中端价位的高端 OLED 显示屏
惠普为 Envy x360 16 和 Spectre x360 16 部署了相同的三星 SDC41A6 OLED 面板,尽管后者要贵得多。因此,两款机型的视觉体验完全相同,包括 100% DCI-P3 色彩、快速响应时间、120 Hz 刷新率、400 nit 最高亮度,甚至还有 OLED 直流调光技术。对于一款中端笔记本电脑来说,这是一款高端显示屏,这让 Envy x360 16 比其他同价位的笔记本电脑更胜一筹。
启用 HDR 后,显示屏亮度可达 616 尼特。否则,SDR 内容的亮度将被限制在约 400 尼特。
120 Hz 显示屏不支持可变刷新率,因此它提供两种固定刷新率选项:48 Hz 和 120 Hz。与大多数其他面板不同,它没有 60 Hz 选项。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 399.4 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.02
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | HP Envy 16 h0112nr Samsung SDC4174, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 LEN160FHD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 ATNA60CL09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G LP160WQ1-SPB2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | 0% | -51% | 0% | -5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.6 | 99.3 0% | 99.6 0% | 40.9 -59% | 99.9 0% | 96.5 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 61.4 -39% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.5 | 88 -9% | 96.7 0% | 42.3 -56% | 96.6 0% | 84.6 -12% |
Response Times | -105% | 1% | -3131% | 4% | -3502% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.8 ? | 2 ? -150% | 0.78 ? 2% | 32.1 ? -3913% | 0.49 ? 39% | 38.4 ? -4700% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.89 ? | 1.9 ? -113% | 0.86 ? 3% | 21.8 ? -2349% | 0.67 ? 25% | 21.4 ? -2304% |
PWM Frequency | 491.8 ? | 240.4 ? -51% | 480 ? -2% | 240 ? -51% | ||
Screen | 3% | -8% | -84% | 14% | -68% | |
Brightness middle | 399.4 | 328.8 -18% | 385.2 -4% | 313.3 -22% | 387 -3% | 329 -18% |
Brightness | 405 | 332 -18% | 387 -4% | 294 -27% | 392 -3% | 310 -23% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 97 -1% | 99 1% | 82 -16% | 98 0% | 88 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.39 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.05 | 1.53 62% | 1.73 57% | 4.41 -9% | 1 75% | 3.52 13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.69 | 6.04 10% | 3.95 41% | 15.75 -135% | 1.9 72% | 6.96 -4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.02 | 1.84 -80% | 1.15 -13% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.3 -18% | 2.6 -136% | 4.4 -300% | 1.7 -55% | 5.75 -423% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.18 101% | 2.17 101% | 2.3 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.137 103% |
CCT | 6419 101% | 6362 102% | 6133 106% | 7395 88% | 6325 103% | 7584 86% |
Contrast | 895 | 844 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -35% /
-26% | -2% /
-4% | -1089% /
-584% | 6% /
8% | -1192% /
-625% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏根据 P3 标准进行了良好校准,开箱即用的灰度和色彩 deltaE 平均值分别仅为 1.1 和 4.05。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.42 ms rise | |
↘ 0.47 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.45 ms rise | |
↘ 0.35 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 491.8 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 491.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 491.8 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
脉宽调制存在于所有亮度级别,包括最大设置。其频率在整个亮度范围内保持恒定的 492 赫兹,而大多数其他 OLED 面板可能会根据亮度级别在两种不同频率之间变化。这是因为惠普采用了直流调光,而其他大多数 OLED 面板只是简单地循环背光来控制亮度。
如果在户外工作,光面显示屏上的眩光几乎是不可避免的。背光灯的功率不足以克服环境光线的影响,但如果在阴凉处,眩光仍可减少到更适合观看的程度。
性能 - Ryzen 7 8840HS 未必优于 Ryzen 7 7840HS
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将 MyHP 和 Windows 都设置为性能模式。遗憾的是,通过 Windows 调整电源配置文件不会自动更改 MyHP 上的电源配置文件,反之亦然。相比之下,戴尔笔记本电脑可以方便地同步不同的电源配置文件。
MyHP 软件在响应速度和功能方面肯定还需要进一步改进。与华硕 ZenBook/VivoBook OLED 机型上的选项相比,该软件本身的启动速度非常慢,而且显示选项也显得苍白无力,在华硕 ZenBook/VivoBook OLED 机型上,用户可以调整色温、蓝光级别、屏保、色彩范围等。
处理器
......(英文 Ryzen 7 8840HS取代去年的 Ryzen 7 7840HS是游戏级移动 CPU,用于高性能笔记本电脑,如联想Legion Slim 7 16.与英特尔 Meteor Lake 系列一样,新的 AMD CPU 集成了一个 NPU,用于加速本地 AI 应用,预计到明年这种应用将变得非常普遍。
遗憾的是,原始多线程性能比旧版 Ryzen 7 7840HS 慢了约 15%至 20%,这并非微不足道。在最新的 华硕 Zenbook 14上也出现了类似的不足,该处理器与惠普的处理器相同。这种差距可归因于新 CPU 较低的 TDP 范围(20 至 30 W 对 35 至 54 W)以及 "鞋底 "NPU 占用了宝贵的芯片空间,而这些空间本应留给非人工智能功能。因此,整体性能更接近第 12 代 酷睿 i7-12700H上的 2022 Envy 16 Clamshell.
Ryzen 7 8840HS 的速度并不慢,因为它仍然优于英特尔 Core Ultra 5 125U和 超 7 155UEnvy x360 16 的性能分别提高了 35% 至 40%。不过,要真正充分发挥 AMD CPU 的性能,您需要在本地 AI 任务变得更加可用时运行这些任务。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (84591 - 93550, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (3847 - 4201, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (99874 - 111733, n=5) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (12929 - 13845, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (44969 - 49687, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (60328 - 76959, n=5) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (468 - 930, n=5) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (10571 - 11985, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (31491 - 43868, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
压力测试
运行 Prime95 会导致 CPU 在最初几秒钟内飙升至 4.1 GHz 和 40 W,然后降至 3.4 GHz 和 32 W。也许是巧合,Spectre x360 16 中的英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 CPU 与我们使用 AMD 处理器的 Envy x360 16 的温度稳定在 76 摄氏度。
运行 Witcher 3性能模式下,CPU 的稳定温度和 GPU 时钟频率分别为 68 C 和 2180 MHz,而在平衡模式下,CPU 的稳定温度和 GPU 时钟频率分别为 61 C 和 1785 MHz。这些差异与我们的Fire Strike 结果和风扇噪音观察结果一致。CPU 封装功耗也受到影响,从性能模式下的 26 W 降至平衡模式下的 20 W。
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 42 |
Prime95 压力 | 3.1 | -- | 77 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 2.9 | 1469 | 73 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡模式) | ~0.3 | 1785 | 61 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | ~0.5 | 2180 | 68 |
系统性能
PCMark 分数远高于去年的 Envy x360 15特别是在生产力和数字内容创建子测试中,CPU 和 GPU 的性能对这两项测试非常重要。Envy x360 16 的平均得分介于 Envy x360 15 和 Spectre x360 16 之间。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (6563 - 7213, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10265 - 11449, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9217 - 10449, n=5) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (8108 - 9163, n=5) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1643 - 1698, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1560 - 1658, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1790 - 1876, n=5) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1314 - 1428, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (297 - 440, n=5) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (246 - 257, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (518 - 563, n=5) | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6958 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (63403 - 76766, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (50273 - 61739, n=5) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (78347 - 107658, n=5) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (92.2 - 122.4, n=5) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 显示,在打开主页的多个标签页时会出现轻微的 DPC 问题。4K60 视频播放也不尽如人意,在 60 秒内记录到 4 次跳帧。虽然跳帧频率不高,不足以引起注意,但理想情况下应该完全没有跳帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配有 KBG50ZNV1T02这是一款经济型 2280 PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘,连续读写速度分别高达 3500 MB/s 和 2900 MB/s,而三星 PM9A1 系列等高端硬盘的读写速度为 7000 MB/s。传输速率在受压时会略有下降,但对于中端系统来说,性能还是不错的。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Envy 16 h0112nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M仍然是集成 GPU 中的猛兽,即使在英特尔推出竞争产品 Arc 8.3DMark 结果显示它与 弧 7但远远领先于较早的 Iris Xe 96 EUs.
如果选择英特尔版本的 Envy x360 16,图形性能将显著下降。这是因为英特尔版本搭载的是酷睿 Ultra U 系列 CPU,而不是酷睿 Ultra H 系列。只有 Core Ultra H CPU 才配备 Arc 7 和 Arc 8 图形处理器,而 Core Ultra U 系列的集成 GPU 性能更接近于 Iris Xe 96 EU。
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 7357 | 22488 | 2636 |
均衡模式 | 6957 (-5%) | 20442 (-9%) | 2509 (-5%) |
电池电量 | 4651 (-37%) | 18788 (-17%) | 1902 (-28%) |
根据我们的Fire Strike 上表,在平衡模式下运行最多会影响 10% 的性能。当设置为平衡模式时,风扇转速明显变慢,性能也随之降低。
3DMark 11 Performance | 11932 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32533 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6823 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2889 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
遗憾的是,即使设置为高性能模式,游戏性能始终低于我们数据库中配备相同 Radeon 780M GPU 的普通笔记本电脑。这可能是由于 Ryzen 7 8840HS 与去年的 Ryzen 7 7840HS 相比,处理器的整体原始性能较慢,从而产生了更多占用 CPU 的情况。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 129.2 | 47.6 | 28.8 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 123.7 | 103.7 | 73 | 65.4 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 64.5 | 34.1 | 25.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 47.8 | 33.9 | 27.9 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 63 | 36 | 33 | 31 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 138.2 | 60.3 | 50.2 | 42.2 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 49.8 | 38 | 24 | 19.5 |
F1 22 (2022) | 70.2 | 60 | 46 | 12 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 35 | 28.5 | 22.6 | 22.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 35.5 | 27.8 | 22.1 | 19.1 |
排放--低点低,高点高
系统噪音
风扇转速和行为与所选的功率曲线密切相关。如果使用平衡模式,风扇运行时会明显更安静,而且在需要升压之前运行的时间会更长。例如,在运行 3DMark 06 时,风扇噪音在第一个基准场景中始终保持在 23.8 dB(A),而如果设置为 "性能 "模式,则会跃升至 28 dB(A)。建议将 MyHP 设为平衡模式,以便在运行网页浏览或视频流等要求不高的任务时限制风扇脉动。
在性能模式下运行时,我们能记录到最大噪音水平接近 44 dB(A) 。 Witcher 3性能模式下的最大噪音值接近 44 分贝(A)。这使得 Envy x360 16 成为运行高负载时噪音最大的 16 英寸可折叠电脑之一,高出几个分贝。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
Load |
| 23.8 / 43.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.9 dB(A) |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02 | HP Envy 16 h0112nr GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -20% | 3% | 1% | -8% | -7% | |
off / environment * | 22.9 | 22.8 -0% | 23.3 -2% | 22.8 -0% | 24.1 -5% | 25.1 -10% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 22.9 -0% | 23.6 -3% | 22.8 1% | 24.1 -5% | 25.1 -9% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 22.9 -0% | 23.6 -3% | 22.8 1% | 24.1 -5% | 25.1 -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 30.5 -33% | 23.6 -3% | 22.8 1% | 26.4 -15% | 26.1 -13% |
Load Average * | 23.8 | 41.4 -74% | 29.2 -23% | 30.8 -29% | 35.2 -48% | 31.4 -32% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.8 | 51.1 -17% | 32.1 27% | 31 29% | 38.5 12% | 41.1 6% |
Load Maximum * | 43.8 | 51.4 -17% | 32.1 27% | 40.8 7% | 39.2 11% | 36.6 16% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
WASD 键附近的热点温度可高达 41 摄氏度,而采用较慢的酷睿 U 处理器的温度仅为 38 摄氏度或 36 摄氏度。 Yoga 7 2 合 1 16IML9或 Envy x360 15。尤其是在负载情况下,左侧掌托的温度会明显高于右侧掌托,但值得庆幸的是,这种热量不会让人感到太不舒服。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.4 °C / 90.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-4.3 °C / -7.7 F).
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | HP Envy 16 h0112nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -10% | 1% | 10% | 11% | -20% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.6 | 45.2 -6% | 39.6 7% | 37.8 11% | 38.6 9% | 55 -29% |
Maximum Bottom * | 47.8 | 44 8% | 39.2 18% | 38.8 19% | 39.2 18% | 55.4 -16% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.4 | 33.6 -23% | 29 -6% | 25.4 7% | 25.2 8% | 34.9 -27% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.8 | 32.6 -17% | 31.6 -14% | 26.8 4% | 25.7 8% | 30 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
在台式机上空转所需的功率在 5 瓦至 15 瓦之间,几乎是 Spectre x360 16 的一半。 Spectre x360 16的一半,这是因为 Envy 机型没有专用 GPU。我们测得,在最大亮度下显示全黑屏幕和全白屏幕时,Envy 的功耗相差 9 W。
运行 Witcher 3运行消耗 55 瓦,而三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 为 47 瓦,IdeaPad Pro 6 16 为 54 瓦。 IdeaPad Pro 6 16这两款产品都配备了同类产品 Arc 8。尽管 AMD 解决方案已推出近两年,但每瓦性能仍然非常出色,总体上与最新的英特尔替代产品不相上下。
正如下面的截图所示,当运行极端负载时,我们可以测量到小巧(约 9.6 x 5.5 x 2.2 厘米)的 65 W USB-C AC 适配器的临时最大功耗为 66 W。
Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.68 Watt |
Idle | 5 / 6.2 / 14.7 Watt |
Load |
49.9 / 65 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | HP Envy 16 h0112nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -128% | -77% | 18% | 18% | -1% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5 | 10 -100% | 5.8 -16% | 3 40% | 3 40% | 5.5 -10% |
Idle Average * | 6.2 | 10.9 -76% | 12.3 -98% | 8.5 -37% | 6.3 -2% | 7.2 -16% |
Idle Maximum * | 14.7 | 27.8 -89% | 33.9 -131% | 8.9 39% | 6.5 56% | 12.9 12% |
Load Average * | 49.9 | 116.4 -133% | 83.3 -67% | 41.1 18% | 49.3 1% | 55 -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.5 | 133.7 -145% | 89.1 -63% | 30.7 44% | 45.9 16% | 47 14% |
Load Maximum * | 65 | 209.8 -223% | 120.8 -86% | 64.6 1% | 65.5 -1% | 63.6 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池容量小于其他大多数 16 英寸笔记本电脑,再加上 OLED 触摸屏的高要求,导致整体运行时间较短。与三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 或 Spectre x360 16 相比,Envy 在自动关机前的实际浏览时间仅为 7.5 小时,而后者则长达一两个小时。尽管如此,电池续航时间还是相当不错的,只要用户不期待 MacBook 级别的正常运行时间。
使用附带的交流适配器从空闲状态充至满电需要大约 90 分钟。
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | HP Envy 16 h0112nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 71 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, 76 Wh | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -1% | 44% | 61% | 7% | 30% | |
Reader / Idle | 935 | 1068 14% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 459 | 472 3% | 660 44% | 738 61% | 531 16% | 716 56% |
Load | 116 | 94 -19% | 114 -2% | 121 4% | ||
H.264 | 881 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 以更低的价格体验幽灵之旅
惠普目前提供两款消费级 16 英寸可折叠产品:中端 Envy x360 16 和高端 Spectre x360 16.令人惊讶的是,Envy 比 Spectre 更轻,但却采用了完全相同的 OLED 触摸屏和几乎相同的尺寸。因此,尽管价格相差悬殊,两款机型的用户体验却比预期的要接近得多。
除了更豪华的设计外,我们还有一些理由更喜欢价格更高的 Spectre x360 16。Envy x360 16 的电池组较小,没有专用 GPU,网络摄像头的分辨率也较低。此外,由于只有一个内部风扇,而不是两个,因此在负载情况下运行时声音会更大。华硕 华硕 VivoBook Pro 16华硕 VivoBook Pro 16 是 Envy x360 16 的一个不错的替代品,因为它配备了 OLED 屏幕、可提供更快性能的 dGPU 和更大的电池,而且价格与 Envy x360 16 差不多,但用户将失去二合一的外形。
支持人工智能的惠普 Envy x360 16 有英特尔和 AMD 两种版本,功能与更昂贵的 Spectre x360 16 非常相似。虽然 AMD 版本的速度明显快于英特尔,但它们缺乏 USB4 和 Thunderbolt 支持,因此对接功能较为有限。
我们还得感谢该机型提供了英特尔 Meteor Lake-U 和 AMD Hawk Point-HS 两种 CPU 选择,这在其他笔记本电脑上并不常见。AMD 版本在处理器原始性能甚至集成显卡性能方面无疑更快。然而,重视 Thunderbolt 的用户只能选择英特尔,忍受处理器速度较慢的问题。令人遗憾的是,AMD 版本不支持 USB4,而如果支持 USB4,就会比基于英特尔的 Envy 版本更容易获得推荐。
价格和供应情况
惠普目前正在出货的 Envy x360 16 机型配备了 Ryzen 7 8840HS、16 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD,售价为 1300 美元。
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr
- 05/22/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.