二合一可折叠 HP Spectre x360 16 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测:功能强大的酷睿-超强全能型 OLED 笔记本电脑
2024 版惠普 Spectre x360 16 比上一代更轻,采用了跳过整整一代的新 CPU,配备了新屏幕(不过分辨率略有下降)、新外壳和网络摄像头,分辨率从 5 百万像素提高到了 9 百万像素。因此,我们有很多理由再次测试这款二合一可折叠电脑,并将其与 2023 年的惠普 Spectre x360 16.
除此之外,Spectre x360 16 还要与其他可转换产品竞争,包括联想 Yoga 7i Gen 8 、全新的联想 ThinkPad X1 Fold 16 、LG Gram 2in1 以及华硕 ExpertBook B5 Flip OLED 。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
91.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.9 kg | 19.8 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.3 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 16.99 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
84.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 i7-1250U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.9 kg | 8.6 mm | 16.30" | 2560x2024 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 17.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.5 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN i7-1260P, A350M | 1.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 带倾斜接口的金属
尽管乍一看非常相似:外壳是新的。笔记本电脑的颜色也是如此,铝制外壳不再是 "夜神蓝",而是 "夜幕黑"。不过,黑色看起来更像是棕灰色调。
它的斜面后角再次引人注目,左侧是耳机接口,右侧是带电源充电功能的 USB-C 接口。不过,除此之外,连接方式也发生了很大变化,稍后再详述。
由于采用了铝制外壳,Spectre 非常稳定,显示屏也是如此。即便如此,扭动底座时还是会发出非常细微的声音。两个铰链看起来也非常稳定,它们允许屏幕 360 度旋转,因此你可以像使用平板电脑一样使用触摸屏。尽管正面有握持缝隙,但要打开盖子还是需要一点力量,单手是无法做到的。
与其 前代产品新款 16 英寸 Spectre 的重量减轻了约 100 克。即便如此,1.9 千克的重量在同类产品中也不算轻巧。 LG Gram(1.5 千克)更轻,华硕 ExpertBook B5 Flipper 也是如此。 华硕 ExpertBook B5 Flip OLED.其他竞争对手的重量都在 1.9 千克到 2 千克之间。
x360 的其他尺寸与前代产品大致相同。一些竞争对手的 X360 明显更薄,19.8 毫米的尺寸则偏高。新款ThinkPad X1 Fold 16 配备了可折叠屏幕,当然是一个特例。
连接性 - 一个 9 百万像素网络摄像头,但端口很少
遗憾的是,新款 Spectre 在这一领域的改变并不完全是积极的,因为它的端口数量明显少于上一代产品。例如,SD 读卡器就被取消了。它的旧电源接口也被砍掉了,新机型只能通过 USB-C 接口充电。总的来说,我们对此表示欢迎,但制造商却没有安装一个专门用于充电的额外 USB 端口,从而破坏了这一点。取而代之的是,现有的两个 Thunderbolt 4 USB-C 端口之一不得不承担起这项工作。由于制造商还取消了该设备的 SD 读卡器,因此额外的 USB 端口本应是一个不错的选择。
此外,它的布局也发生了变化:现在,HDMI 插槽位于右侧,而不是左侧,这可能会给惯用右手的人在处理笨重的显示线缆时带来麻烦--即使端口非常靠后。
交流
虽然前代机型已经支持 WiFi 6E,但惠普的新机型在此基础上又掌握了新的 WiFi 7 标准。
它在 6 GHz 频率和 5 GHz 网络中的传输速率都非常出色。
网络摄像头
这款笔记本电脑的前代产品已经配备了一个 500 万像素的网络摄像头,可用于高分辨率视频通话。尽管如此,惠普仍对新款 Spectre 16 的网络摄像头进行了进一步改进,其分辨率甚至达到了 900 万像素,并支持夜间模式(通过红外线)。
不过,其视频分辨率仍然 "只有 "1440p,而 "未使用 "的额外像素则被惠普用于自动取景等多种效果。所有这些都通过人工智能功能(如噪声抑制)来支持。在惠普指挥中心的 "GlamCam "版块中,有一大堆设置可供选择,从手势控制摄像头到安全功能和通过摄像头监控屏幕时间。该相机有一个物理快门,可通过按键 (fn +) F2 激活。
虽然它的照片具有高分辨率,但色彩准确度还有待提高。
安全
CPU 中集成了 TPM 2.0 安全模块。
x360 16 还配备了指纹扫描仪,与电源按钮集成在一起。
如上所述,网络摄像头还配有快门。
配件和保修
除了 100 瓦的电源和所有常见的文件外,惠普还为这款笔记本电脑配备了惠普 Tilt Pen MPP 2.0 输入手写笔。不过,上一代机型随附的笔记本电脑保护套不再包括在内。
惠普为该设备提供为期两年的部件和人工保修服务。但不提供现场维修服务。
维护
底板仅通过 4 个 Torx T4 螺丝固定。由于铰链附近的两颗螺丝比前面的大,因此可以快速卸下。
撬开坚固的铝制底板并不容易,但可以从正面撬开,因为扬声器的进气口提供了一个攻击面。夹子夹得很紧,所以你可能需要用扁铲小心翼翼地撬开外壳。
在内部,你可以看到风扇、WLAN 模块、固态硬盘、扬声器和电池。遗憾的是,内存是永久安装的,无法更换。许多组件都位于黑色塑料盖下,尽管表面有粘胶,但还是很容易掀开。
输入设备 - 输入笔和大型触摸板
键盘
按键的灰色比深色背景稍浅。加上白色的字样,使它们从笔记本电脑的其他部分中脱颖而出。
上/下箭头键的高度减半,但其他按键都很大(约 1.65 x 1.65 毫米),布局也非常整齐。它没有数字键盘。
按 F2 键可以遮住网络摄像头,而按键则不同寻常地位于右侧的移位键上,我们很快就发现这一点非常好,因为它比通常位于顶排的按键更容易触及。
键盘按键的键程适中,但反馈清晰,因此在键盘上打字时感觉快速流畅。
键盘具有均匀的白色背光,还能照亮特殊功能,并有两个亮度级别。
触摸板
与新的 雷蛇刀锋 16这款笔记本电脑的触摸板非常大(约 16 x 10 厘米)。不过,这也是 Spectre 的一个积极方面,因为我们没有遇到任何手掌无意触碰的问题。
它的表面非常光滑,即使是缓慢移动也没有问题。它的灵敏度向下角略有下降,但除此之外,它的反应速度始终不错。
点击集成按键的声音非常小,但其反馈仍然非常明显--尽管按压点一如既往地平坦。
触摸屏和惠普倾斜笔 MPP 2.0
除了键盘和触摸板,x360 16 还可以通过触摸屏使用手指或附带的触控笔进行操作。
这两种方式都非常好用。康宁大猩猩玻璃表面确保了触控笔的顺畅滑动,尤其是在平板模式下使用时。
显示屏 - 2.8K OLED 触摸屏,刷新率为 120 赫兹
该设备的 16 英寸触摸屏采用三星的 OLED 面板。它的分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800 (2.8 K),比上一代产品(3,072 x 1,920 像素)略低,但由于采用了 OLED 技术,色彩和对比度都非常出色。屏幕长宽比为 16:10,刷新率为 120 Hz。
在 SDR 模式下,我们测得的平均亮度为 425 尼特。在 HDR 模式下,亮度可望提高约 100 尼特。与典型的有机发光二极管一样,它的亮度分布接近完美,黑色水平也是如此,这将其对比度提升到了一个非常高的水平。
该机型支持 48-120 Hz 的刷新率,采用边缘到边缘玻璃、抗反射康宁大猩猩玻璃和蓝光过滤器。尽管其表面名义上具有防反射功能,但其反射率仍然很高,至少在黑暗环境中是如此。
它的响应速度很快,而且 OLED 屏幕无论如何都不需要处理背光出血问题。
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 421 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.37 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.26
ΔE Greyscale 2.55 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng AU Optronics AUO50A3, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 LEN160FHD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 Sharp LJ163B1JX01, OLED, 2560x2024, 16.3" | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G LP160WQ1-SPB2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN Samsung ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -14% | -50% | 1% | -4% | -8% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98.9 | 75.6 -24% | 42 -58% | 99.9 1% | 96.5 -2% | 71.7 -28% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100.2 0% | 62.8 -37% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94.4 | 77.2 -18% | 43.5 -54% | 96 2% | 84.6 -10% | 97.1 3% |
Response Times | -4550% | -2933% | -26% | -3370% | -100% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.8 ? | 52 ? -6400% | 31.8 ? -3875% | 0.99 ? -24% | 38.4 ? -4700% | 2 ? -150% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1 ? | 28 ? -2700% | 20.9 ? -1990% | 1.04 ? -4% | 21.4 ? -2040% | 2 ? -100% |
PWM Frequency | 480 | 240.6 ? -50% | 240 ? -50% | |||
Screen | -82% | -85% | -10% | -32% | -5% | |
Brightness middle | 424 | 425 0% | 279.4 -34% | 403.4 -5% | 329 -22% | 379 -11% |
Brightness | 425 | 406 -4% | 257 -40% | 423 0% | 310 -27% | 382 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 78 -21% | 81 -18% | 89 -10% | 88 -11% | 98 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.39 | 0.01 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.37 | 5.8 -145% | 5.12 -116% | 2.98 -26% | 3.52 -49% | 2.79 -18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.97 | 11.03 -122% | 19.42 -291% | 4.27 14% | 6.96 -40% | 5.29 -6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.26 | 4.16 -84% | 1.84 19% | 2.64 -17% | 1.15 49% | 2.5 -11% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.55 | 7.57 -197% | 5.5 -116% | 3.2 -25% | 5.75 -125% | 1.92 25% |
Gamma | 2.49 88% | 6600 0% | 2.22 99% | 2.51 88% | 2.137 103% | 2.38 92% |
CCT | 6548 99% | 6407 101% | 6264 104% | 7584 86% | 6270 104% | |
Contrast | 1771 | 1552 | 844 | 37900 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1549% /
-810% | -1023% /
-551% | -12% /
-11% | -1135% /
-581% | -38% /
-27% |
* ... smaller is better
其色彩空间覆盖率非常高。sRGB 和 DCI-P3 几乎完全覆盖,而 AdobeRGB 的覆盖率仍高达 95%。
开箱后,Spectre 16 的校准效果不错,但其 DeltaE 值并不像我们希望的那么低,有时甚至超过 2。不过,即使我们进行了手动校准,也只是将偏差略微降低了一些。不过,灰度值还是可以降到 2 以下。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5 ms rise | |
↘ 0.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise | |
↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
由于 OLED 显示屏会闪烁,我们不得不手动确定屏幕的上升和下降时间,这可以从下面的截图中看到。
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在室外,屏幕的轻微反光表面无法防止所有反光,但由于其亮度高、对比度强,在阴暗处也能保持良好的可视性。您只需避免阳光直射即可。
作为 OLED 的典型代表,该屏幕拥有非常宽的可视角度。即使从极端角度观看,其亮度和色彩也能保持稳定。
性能 - 独家娱乐设备 Intel Core Ultra
这款商务笔记本电脑配备了 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H集成英特尔 Arc 显卡、32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD。惠普宣传 Spectre 是一款适用于各种情况的生产力笔记本电脑。可折叠成平板电脑模式的触摸屏、笔输入和带有 AI 芯片的全新酷睿 Ultra 处理器都是它的主要卖点,使 x360 16 使用起来非常灵活。
测试条件
惠普的命令中心没有列出 Spectre x360 16 的性能配置文件,Windows 电源选项中也只有单一的平衡模式。我们使用该模式进行了测试。
处理器
高端 英特尔酷睿至强 7 155HCPU 属于全新的 Meteor Lake 系列,集成了用于人工智能应用的 NPU 单元。该处理器有 14 个内核(6 个 P 核、8 个 E 核)。P 核心具有超线程功能,另外还有两个低功耗高效核心,因此总共有 22 个线程。
其最高涡轮时钟频率为 4.8 GHz。该处理器集成了一个具有 8 个 Xe 内核的 Arc 图形卡。
Cinebench 循环测试已经表明,Spectre 更适合短时间负载,而超薄可折叠电脑的性能在长时间负载时会下降。尽管如此,新 CPU 的性能还是超过了竞争对手的旧 Core-i 型号,因此在所有 CPU 基准测试中都获得了(临时)性能桂冠。至少在我们测试更多使用新酷睿 Ultra CPU 的设备之前是这样。作为对比:同样的 CPU 在较小的 14 英寸 Spectre x360 中的性能明显较弱--参见信息图(米色/棕色曲线)。其 前代的 i7-12700H在所有 CPU 测试中均比其前代产品高出约 9%。
在电池模式下,其 Cinebench R15 多核性能下降了约 32%。右侧的截图显示,在连接电源时,其初始性能较高。不过,它在电池模式下的性能在其他运行过程中也同样出色,约为 42 瓦,不过在电池模式下的某些运行接近尾声时,其性能也降至 22 瓦。另一方面,在连接电源时,它的功率也从未持续超过 40 瓦。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng -2! | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN -2! | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 -2! | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=47) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (616 - 18070, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1815, n=47) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (308 - 1970, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=45) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 755, n=62, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2880, n=51) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=47) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Average of class Convertible (193 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (175 - 381, n=43) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70254, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (4795 - 5621, n=45) | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=50) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Convertible (3257 - 14267, n=39, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=47) | |
Average of class Convertible (1216 - 2696, n=39, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=47) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1462 - 1824, n=47) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Convertible (319 - 2003, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 20.1, n=62, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40.9 - 79.2, n=44) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4457 - 0.53, n=44) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Average of class Convertible (468 - 25226, n=63, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Average of class Convertible (2644 - 106512, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Average of class Convertible (182 - 4764, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=45) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Average of class Convertible (659 - 14835, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Average of class Convertible (1420 - 56839, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1088, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Convertible (254 - 13175, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=45) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average of class Convertible (5136 - 53406, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng |
系统性能
在 PCMark 10 中,与去年的大多数竞争对手相比,我们的 x360 16 总体上处于领先地位,尽管 CPU 在《要点》中略显薄弱。总而言之,系统运行速度非常快,我们没有发现任何明显的延迟。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=32) | |
Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=32) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=32) | |
Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=32) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=59, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=32) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Convertible (310 - 1912, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=31) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average of class Convertible (389 - 1790, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=31) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Average of class Convertible (252 - 2183, n=59, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=31) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average of class Convertible (295 - 1868, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=32) | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Average of class Convertible (84.2 - 407, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=27) | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Average of class Convertible (49.4 - 314, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Convertible (407 - 2676, n=63, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=33) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6871 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=45) | |
Average of class Convertible (16353 - 108544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=45) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=62, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=45) | |
Average of class Convertible (10177 - 117920, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (120.2 - 233, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=62, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
一旦打开浏览器,LatencyMon 就会检测到第一个问题。在打开多个浏览器标签页时,这些延迟值略有增加。总体而言,它的延迟值仍然是最低的。不过,我们对其播放 4K/60 fps YouTube 视频感到失望,因为我们在 60 秒内检测到 13 次丢帧。这款笔记本电脑在这方面还有待改进,尤其是对于一款生产力笔记本电脑来说,这个数值实在太高了。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
惠普在笔记本电脑中安装了一个来自 Kioxia 的 1-TB PCIe 4 NVMe SSD。这款存储设备在我们的 固态硬盘最佳排行榜.制造商使用了 112 层 3D TLC 闪存(每单元 3 位)和 SLC 高速缓存。
在我们测试的笔记本电脑中,它的表现非常出色,尤其是在通过 DiskSpd 进行的耐用性测试中,我们没有发现任何节流问题,相比之下,它的性能非常好。
在所有测试中,该固态硬盘仍然只获得了第三名,比我们对该固态硬盘型号的平均评分整整低了 17%,这是因为该型号的 4K 读写性能非常弱。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
虽然 Spectre x360 16 也可以配备 RTX 4050,但我们的测试配置中,这款全能型产品只能配备 弧形显卡与 8 个 Xe 内核集成在 英特尔酷睿 155H.这并不是什么大问题,因为首先,这是目前市场上最好的英特尔 iGPU;其次,英特尔终于对其 iGPU 进行了大修,使其功能大大强于旧版本。 UHD Graphics英特尔。
在 3DMark 测试中,x360 16 在每个子测试中都名列前茅,在合成测试中,它甚至比我们数据库中的平均 8 核 Arc GPU 快 9%。
由于我们的 Spectre 比英特尔下一个最佳机型(华硕 ExpertBook B5 Flipper)快整整 26%,所以我们的 Spectre 比英特尔下一个最佳机型(华硕 ExpertBook B5 Flipper)快整整 26%。 华硕 ExpertBook B5 Flip的速度足足快了 26%。 Arc A350MGPU 的华硕 ExpertBook B5 Flip)快整整 26%,比 LG Gram 2in1的速度快 61%,几乎是其前代产品的两倍。在图形基准测试中,我们的 Arc Spectre 还要与 联想 ThinkPad P14s G4的集成 AMD Radeon 780M.在 3DMark 测试中,Spectre 的 8 核 Arc GPU 性能仅比 780M 高出 2%。
在断开电源的情况下,我们的 x360 在额外运行Fire Strike 时性能下降了约 7%--这是可以承受的。
3DMark 11 Performance | 12381 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29735 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8439 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3718 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
遗憾的是,Arc Graphics 仍然无法令人信服地将其巨大潜力(在合成基准测试中显而易见)转移到所有游戏中。虽然我们的 Spectre 在 3DMark 测试中仍然比其前代产品领先 95%,但在我们的游戏基准测试中,它的整体表现仅领先 39%。
采用 配备 780M 处理器的 AMD ThinkPad在游戏中甚至领先 Spectre 8%;而在 3DMark 测试中,两者的排名正好相反。尽管如此,许多(如果不是大多数)游戏都可以在全高清和中等细节下流畅运行,这与前代产品相比是一个很大的飞跃。在运行要求不高的游戏时,它的性能也足以满足全高清高细节的要求。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Average of class Convertible (10 - 123.3, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21K5000LGE | |
Average of class Convertible (7.07 - 114.3, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN | |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng |
Witcher 3在全高清和超高设置下的平均运行速度仅为 23 帧/秒。不过,在 "高 "而非 "超 "设置下,游戏的运行速度已经略高于 40 帧/秒。
当我们让《Witcher 3 Ultra》在没有交互的情况下运行一个小时时,帧率按照通常的昼夜变化,我们看不到任何下降,帧率保持恒定。在这方面,Arc 显卡似乎也优于去年的竞争对手。不过 配备 AMD iGPU 的 ThinkPad显然也更快。
CPU 的短暂功耗为 44 瓦,但几秒钟后温度就达到了 89 °C,导致功耗降至 30 瓦左右。之后,CPU 的温度稳定在 70 ℃ 左右。iGPU 的平均时钟频率为 1,900 Mhz。
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 153.3 | 134.8 | 36.2 | 13.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 131.2 | 79.1 | 42.4 | 23.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 98.9 | 89.4 | 74.5 | 71.1 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 63 | 37.9 | 24.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 52 | 39.8 | 31.3 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 63 | 37 | 35 | 34 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 190.2 | 80.3 | 66.7 | 52.5 |
F1 22 (2022) | 77.2 | 71.4 | 55.1 | 15 |
F1 23 (2023) | 71.9 | 66.8 | 44.9 | 12.7 |
排放 - 非常安静的 Spectre x360 16
噪音排放
与前代产品相比,新款 x360 16 的 CPU 性能提高了约 10%,图形性能提高了 39% 至 95%,而且启动时噪音明显降低。
风扇在空闲模式下始终处于关闭状态,这也适用于较小的日常负载,如上网或流媒体视频。Spectre 甚至在运行 3DMark 06 的整个第一场景时风扇都没有启动,令人印象深刻!前代产品在这里已经达到了近 43 分贝的最大风扇音量!
2023 Spectre 在游戏时也产生了同样的噪音,而我们的 2024 Spectre 在运行 Witcher 3 Ultra 时风扇的呼啸声只有 27 分贝。在重负载情况下,风扇的声音绝对清晰可闻,但远没有其他超极本的风扇声音大。只有 联想 ThinkPad X1 Fold 16做得更好,因为它根本没有风扇,只是被动散热。不过,在性能方面,Fold 16 也不得不接受一些明显的妥协。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
Load |
| 23 / 28.62 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X073N | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN A350M, i7-1260P, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -34% | -29% | -22% | -41% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 26 -13% | 22.8 1% | 25.1 -9% | 27.5 -20% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 26 -13% | 22.9 -0% | 25.1 -9% | 27.5 -20% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 26 -13% | 22.9 -0% | 25.1 -9% | 27.5 -20% |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 26 -13% | 26.9 -17% | 26.1 -13% | 28.3 -23% |
Load Average * | 23 | 42.9 -87% | 41.7 -81% | 31.4 -37% | 40.7 -77% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 27 | 42.9 -59% | 41.5 -54% | 41.1 -52% | |
Load Maximum * | 28.62 | 39.1 -37% | 43.6 -52% | 36.6 -28% | 53.6 -87% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
一般来说,Spectre 右侧的发热量要高于左侧。由于风扇在空闲模式下处于停用状态,我们的测试机型比某些竞争对手的发热量要高一些,但这是正常现象,在最高温度为 30 ℃ 时不会有问题。
游戏时,我们在电源按钮对面的底部测得 40 °C的热点温度,但所有其他测量点的温度仅略高于 30 °C。在负载情况下,热点温度最高升至 44 °C,在此温度附近,设备温度也略高,约为 37 °C,但左侧始终保持凉爽。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-4.9 °C / -8.8 F).
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 8% | 1% | 2% | -23% | 4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 37 | 37.4 -1% | 37.6 -2% | 41.6 -12% | 55 -49% | 37.9 -2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44 | 39.1 11% | 40 9% | 44.8 -2% | 55.4 -26% | 39.4 10% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31 | 27.1 13% | 30.4 2% | 27.2 12% | 34.9 -13% | 28.8 7% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 26.3 9% | 30.6 -6% | 26.4 9% | 30 -3% | 29.1 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在压力测试期间,CPU 内核的主频曾短暂达到 2.6 GHz。它们的温度升高到 94 °C,然后被节流。它们的时钟频率稳定在 1.5 GHz 左右,功耗从 65 瓦降至 37 瓦左右。
图形核心的表现类似。它们在温度为 88 ℃ 时被迅速节流。在最初的 1.4 GHz 之后,它们的平均频率仅为 465 MHz,时钟频率波动很大。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) | |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.5 | 465 | 74 | 70 |
Witcher 3 压力 | 0.07 | 1,990 | 70 | 60 |
发言人
Spectre x360 16 的扬声器位于前部边缘,因此不会向侧面辐射,而是向下朝前方辐射。
这可以产生相当大的音量,而且还能提供均衡的高音和至少线性的中音。当然,低音也会受到限制,但不会像某些竞争对手那样严重。
3.5 毫米组合插孔可用于连接模拟音频设备。
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 效率提高了,但负载消耗也增加了
耗电量
新款惠普笔记本电脑在效率方面也令人印象深刻。尤其是空闲时的耗电量再次降低--几乎没有对比设备的耗电量如此之低。
在负载情况下,则需要对其数值进行更仔细的分析。在运行《Witcher 3 》时,新机型的耗电量比上一代产品高出约 30%,但在玩游戏时的表现却比上一代产品高出 86%,效率明显提高。
与采用英特尔较早的入门级 dGPU 的华硕 ExpertBook B5 Flip 相比也很有趣。 Witcher 3
我们测得的短时负载峰值高达 90 瓦。附带的 100 瓦 USB-C 电源(约 13.6 x 5.8 厘米)可以轻松吸收这些功率。
Off / Standby | 0.2 / 1.5 Watt |
Idle | 4.1 / 4.5 / 5.9 Watt |
Load |
51.2 / 90.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X073N, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 i7-1250U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDQMQD-512G, OLED, 2560x2024, 16.3" | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN i7-1260P, A350M, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-1T00, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -64% | -26% | -45% | -32% | -57% | -46% | -32% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 9 -120% | 3.3 20% | 5.2 -27% | 5.5 -34% | 6.5 -59% | 5.41 ? -32% | 5.21 ? -27% |
Idle Average * | 4.5 | 11.1 -147% | 10.2 -127% | 6.7 -49% | 7.2 -60% | 7.6 -69% | 8.64 ? -92% | 8.16 ? -81% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.9 | 16.4 -178% | 10.3 -75% | 22 -273% | 12.9 -119% | 9.8 -66% | 12.1 ? -105% | 11.1 ? -88% |
Load Average * | 51.2 | 38.3 25% | 55.2 -8% | 36.9 28% | 55 -7% | 85 -66% | 54.2 ? -6% | 46.2 ? 10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.6 | 34.4 28% | 43.8 8% | 38.7 19% | 47 1% | 85.6 -80% | ||
Load Maximum * | 90.4 | 82.5 9% | 65.7 27% | 63.3 30% | 63.6 30% | 91 -1% | 85 ? 6% | 67 ? 26% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption The Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
惠普在该设备中安装了一块 83 瓦时的电池,与其前代产品一样。不过,由于效率提高,新机型的续航时间更长。在网上冲浪时,我们测得的数值在最大亮度下为 8 小时,在亮度降低到 150 尼特时甚至可以使用近 12 小时。在亮度降低(扬声器关闭)的情况下,H.264 编码的电影《Big Buck Bunny》可连续循环观看近 14.5 小时。总之,电池续航能力非常出色。
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 83 Wh | HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 16-f1075ng i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 83 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 71 Wh | Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 i7-1250U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 64 Wh | LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN i7-1260P, A350M, 84 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -22% | -16% | -49% | -7% | -32% | -15% | |
H.264 | 862 | 671 -22% | 773 ? -10% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 717 | 630 -12% | 566 -21% | 329 -54% | 716 0% | 488 -32% | 594 ? -17% |
Load | 139 | 95 -32% | 124 -11% | 79 -43% | 121 -13% | 114.9 ? -17% | |
Reader / Idle | 1233 | 1138 | 730 | 1344 ? |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 多方面的重大更新
与许多游戏笔记本电脑相比,今年的惠普 Spectre x360 16 可折叠笔记本电脑有了许多改进。首先是处理器,现在采用的是 Core Ultra 155H--比上一代的 H 系列 CPU 更强大、更高效。因此,它也使今年的 Spectre 比上一代安静得多。这款笔记本的 OLED 显示屏也非常抢眼,其 9 百万像素网络摄像头可在视频电话会议中实现多种效果和功能。
要想找到真正的缺陷,还得再仔细看看,其中包括笔记本电脑的连接性。它的读卡器和专有电源连接已被取消,这只是为了节省 100 克的重量。后者是值得欢迎的,但现在三个 USB 端口中只有一个支持 USB-C 实用充电。在这个价位的超极本中,焊接式内存并不罕见。令我们感到意外的是,该设备在播放 4K/60-fps YouTube 视频时出现了 13 次丢帧。事实上,Arc 可能在游戏领域做得更好,这让我们对未来充满希望。
今年的惠普 Spectre x360 16 比以往更加强大。除了许多小的改进之外,新的 Core Ultra 表现出色,为这款全能型可折叠电脑带来了更大的灵活性、更强的动力和更高的效率,尤其是在 3D 方面。
我们还没有测试过真正的替代产品;将它与上一代产品进行比较并非偶然,因为 CPU 和配备它的设备都还很新。在 3D 性能方面,集成 AMD 780M 的设备尤其可以与英特尔 Spectre 相媲美。
价格和供应情况
惠普 Spectre x360 16 目前在惠普在线商店有售,价格从美元 1,849.99 起。.
HP Spectre x360 16-aa0074ng
- 02/23/2024 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.