全新华为 MateBook 14 评测:替代 MacBook Air 的尝试
从外观上看,新款华为 MateBook 14 与前代产品相比几乎没有变化。 前代产品.该制造商继续使用出色的显示屏,采用 3:2 格式的触摸屏和 2K 分辨率。在制造商的产品阵容中,这款超极本的定位介于 MateBook X Pro和 MateBook D14.1100 欧元(约合 1199 美元)的正常价格经常会有高达 270 欧元(约合 294 美元)的降价,这使得这款显示出真正高品质做工的机型仅售 830 欧元(约合 905 美元)。该机型的标签略显混乱。由于更新版 MateBook 14 早在 2022 年就已进入中国市场,因此华为自己称其为 "MateBook 14 2022"。但该机型于 2023 年第四季度才在欧洲市场上市,因此在这里被称为 "MateBook 14 2023"。
与同时提供英特尔和 AMD 版本的前代产品相比 AMD 版本,今年只能满足于英特尔版本。这里使用的是 英特尔酷睿 i5-1240P我们的测试机配备了 16GB 工作内存和 512GB 固态硬盘。
由于设计上没有任何变化,颜色又是 "太空灰",因此可以与Macbook Air M2 进行比较。此外,其他值得比较的产品还包括前代机型以及LG Gram 14Z90Q 和Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 ,这两款产品同样使用 i5-1240P 处理器。作为采用 AMD 处理器的竞争对手,我们选择了Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5 ,而作为与当前英特尔处理器的比较,我们选择了Acer Swift Go 14 笔记本电脑。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.8 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
92.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2, M2 8-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" | 2560x1664 | |
88.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 R7 7730U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | LG Gram 14Z90Q i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 980 g | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
86.4 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
86.1 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.2 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
v (old) | 12 / 2023 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳:太空灰和铝
与前代机型相比,机箱几乎没有任何变化 与前代机型相比.现在的华为 MateBook 14 从名字上就能看出它的意图,简洁的铝制外壳让人不禁联想到 MacBook Air M2。 MacBook Air M2.外壳看起来非常坚固,底座和显示屏盖子可以抵御扭曲的尝试。单手无法打开笔记本电脑,在调整盖子角度时,铰链晃动很大。
虽然最大打开角度为 150 度,但由于采用了触摸屏,180 度的打开角度也非常实用,可以让显示屏平放在表面上。与前代产品一样,尽管键盘面板采用了铝制外壳,但其延展性比预期的要大,不过我们并没有发现任何真正的问题。
设备:与前身相同
设备与前身相比没有变化 前身.您可以在左侧找到音频接口、单个 USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 端口和 HDMI 1.4b(4K @30Hz)。右侧的两个 USB-A 端口都提供 3.2 Gen 1 标准也是一个优势。
由于单个 USB-C 端口也是唯一的充电选项,因此只能通过加密狗才能有效使用。尽管 MateBook 配备了英特尔处理器,但遗憾的是它不支持 Thunderbolt。
有关 Wi-Fi 芯片和集成在键盘中的网络摄像头的更多详情,请参阅我们的 前代产品的评测因为在这方面没有任何变化。网络摄像头继续提供 720P 分辨率,但由于其在键盘中的位置较低,可视角度较差。虽然网络摄像头的质量尚可,但在光线不足的情况下很快就会达到极限。
维护
要卸下底板,首先要卸下总共 10 颗同样大小的螺丝。之后,用几个吸盘就可以将底板吸起。在内部,可以更换 M.2 固态硬盘,但不能更换 Wi-Fi 模块。双风扇可以轻松拆卸和清洁,电池也很容易更换。
输入设备:大型触摸板和实体键盘
虽然我们无法看到目前的华为 MateBook 14 的键盘与前代产品相比有任何外部变化 前代但至少从主观上看,打字体验要好于去年的机型。按键清脆,与前代机型相比,键盘没有海绵感。尽管直接竞争对手 MacBook Air M2的键盘更加出色,但我们在测试中很快就能达到我们通常的键入速度。与前代产品一样,键盘在键入时会有一些轻微的松动,但在测试过程中并没有明显的不适。
,但仍有一点需要指出的是,"Home "和 "End "等功能键最好能有。但总的来说,键盘即使在长时间书写时也能感觉到精确和舒适,因此也适合经常打字的人使用。指纹传感器仍然集成在电源键上,幸运的是,电源键并没有像目前许多其他机型那样成为键盘的一部分。
显示屏更亮,对比度值更差
除了更新的处理器,华为 MateBook 14 更明亮的显示屏可能是与前代机型相比最大的变化 前代机型相比.根据设备信息,即使是相同的面板,我们也能测量到明显更好的数值,这让我们认为华为在这里进行了额外的校准。
制造商继续使用 3:2 格式的 14 英寸显示屏,分辨率高达 2,160 x 1,440 像素。显示屏四边的边框都很纤薄,没有像 MacBook Air M2 那样增加凹槽,非常吸引人。 MacBook Air M2.
在某些方面,显示屏的测量结果明显优于前代产品。平均亮度为 411 cd/m²,比前代产品高出 44 cd/m²,亮度分布好了近 10%。另一方面,前代产品的出色对比度值这次未能达到,显示屏仍保持在 1548:1 的宣传值范围内。在色彩空间覆盖率方面,与前代产品相比,我们没有看到明显的改进,AdobeRGB、sRGB 和 DCI-P3 的数值反而下降了 2%。
除了触摸屏功能外,每英寸 185 像素的高像素密度也使整体效果更加完美。尽管我们的测试机显示出一些轻微的屏幕出血和混浊效果,但在日常操作中并不十分明显。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 418 cd/m²
Contrast: 1548:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.85
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
66.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.121
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) BOE XS TV140WTM-NHH0, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 BOE XS TV140WTM-NHH0, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | LG Gram 14Z90Q LG LP140WU1-SPF1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p Sharp SHP1548 LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 M140NWHE R1, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 30% | 2% | 29% | 6% | 36% | 5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.4 | 98.4 53% | 65.6 2% | 98.4 53% | 69 7% | 99.75 55% | 69.3 8% |
sRGB Coverage | 95.3 | 99.9 5% | 97.4 2% | 99.9 5% | 99 4% | 99.99 5% | 97.6 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.4 | 87.6 32% | 67.5 2% | 85.9 29% | 71 7% | 98.56 48% | 70.4 6% |
Response Times | -14% | -6% | -40% | -28% | 68% | -9% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 27.5 ? | 32.9 ? -20% | 34 ? -24% | 47.5 ? -73% | 45 ? -64% | 2.2 ? 92% | 36.3 ? -32% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 24.9 ? -8% | 20 ? 13% | 24.5 ? -7% | 21 ? 9% | 12.8 ? 44% | 19.5 ? 15% |
PWM Frequency | 300 | ||||||
Screen | 8% | 4% | -45% | -62% | -32% | -9% | |
Brightness middle | 418 | 526 26% | 364 -13% | 341 -18% | 498 19% | 388 -7% | 362 -13% |
Brightness | 411 | 486 18% | 367 -11% | 305 -26% | 460 12% | 391 -5% | 354 -14% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 87 -4% | 82 -10% | 87 -4% | 85 -7% | 98 8% | 91 0% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.38 -41% | 0.145 46% | 0.26 4% | 0.53 -96% | 0.0411 85% | 0.18 33% |
Contrast | 1548 | 1384 -11% | 2510 62% | 1312 -15% | 940 -39% | 9440 510% | 2011 30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.04 | 1.3 36% | 1.92 6% | 3.11 -52% | 3.65 -79% | 6.32 -210% | 2.6 -27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.93 | 2.7 8% | 3.7 -26% | 8.29 -183% | 7.11 -143% | 8.82 -201% | 3.7 -26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.85 | 0.7 18% | 0.95 -12% | 0.83 2% | 2.16 -154% | 4.79 -464% | 1.1 -29% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 2 20% | 2.61 -4% | 5.3 -112% | 4.25 -70% | 2.61 -4% | 3.3 -32% |
Gamma | 2.121 104% | 2.25 98% | 2.38 92% | 2.037 108% | 2.45 90% | 1.772 124% | 2.28 96% |
CCT | 7067 92% | 6858 95% | 7063 92% | 7571 86% | 6690 97% | 6202 105% | 6761 96% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 8% /
9% | 0% /
2% | -19% /
-28% | -28% /
-42% | 24% /
-3% | -4% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
灰度、色彩和饱和度的平均 DeltaE 值介于 2 和 2.5 之间,在校准之前就已经很不错了,但如果再进行一次校准,它们还能得到明显改善。校准后,灰度的平均 DeltaE 值为 0.4,非常不错。饱和度的测量值可提高到 0.95,饱和度的测量值可提高到 0.85。因此,即使测量值已经高于 IPS 面板的平均水平,也值得对显示器进行额外的校准。您可以在显示信息部分下载我们的色彩配置文件进行校准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.5 ms rise | |
↘ 10.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
27.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.5 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
华为 MateBook 14 的平均亮度更高,比前代机型更适合户外使用。不过,在阳光直射的情况下,即使是现在的机型也会达到极限。偶尔在公园或火车上工作时,亮度是足够的,但与市场上的哑光版本相比,反光显示屏当然有一些缺点。
性能英特尔酷睿 i5-1240P 展示其最佳性能
虽然 前代机型提供了总共四个处理器版本,而现在的华为 MateBook 14 却只提供了一个处理器版本。不过,在基准测试中取得的优异成绩表明,这并不是一个缺点。
在测试中,该处理器的性能仅次于 AMD Ryzen 7 7730U在 联想 ThinkPad E14 G5和较新的 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H的 宏碁 Swift Go 14.在几乎所有的合成基准测试中,MateBook 14 都超过了其前代产品 MacBook Air M2。 MacBook Air M2和 戴尔 XPS 13 Plus 9320和 LG Gram 14Z90Q 采用相同的处理器。
即使在 Cinebench 循环测试中,CPU 在 4 分钟后才趋于稳定,但在长时间运行后,我们也没有发现任何较大的性能下降。与前代机型一样,电池运行时的性能下降也是微不足道的。
测试条件
华为 PC Manager 软件允许您在性能模式和平衡功率模式之间切换。在性能模式下,风扇的声音会明显增大,TDP 也会略有增加。但通过比较可以发现,在该模式下,平均性能并没有大幅提升。因此,那些注重降低风扇噪音的用户也可以使用平衡模式,而不必对性能有更大的担忧。
性能 | 平衡 | |
---|---|---|
CPU PL1 (HWInfo) | 45 瓦 | 35 瓦 |
CPU PL2 (HWInfo) | 66 瓦 | 65.63 瓦 |
处理器
虽然 前身仍然使用四核 英特尔酷睿 i7-1165G7处理器,而新款华为 MateBook 则采用了 酷睿 i5-1240P处理器,在几乎所有基准测试中都取得了更好的成绩。处理器在 Cinebench R15 循环中的启动频率接近 3.5 GHz,然后迅速降至 2.6 GHz 左右。两分钟后,性能继续下降到约 2.4 GHz,约 4 分钟后,处理器的频率稳定在 2.2 GHz,并不时变化到 3.2 和 3.4 GHz 之间。循环开始时的峰值功耗超过 60 瓦,基准测试期间的平均功耗为 32 瓦。内核温度最高为 87 °C(189 °F),平均为 72 °C(162 °F),明显低于前代产品 83 °C(181 °F)的平均水平。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Office | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry -5! | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (277 - 11556, n=20) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (640 - 1689, n=18) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (763 - 4456, n=16) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Office (229 - 764, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (251 - 653, n=16) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (407 - 2007, n=19) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (91.8 - 243, n=18) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (285 - 1926, n=16) | |
Average of class Office (208 - 2248, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (7254 - 47002, n=16) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (2197 - 5320, n=16) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (1763 - 10112, n=15) | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1989, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (672 - 1658, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average of class Office (1.55 - 18.7, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (1.99 - 12.9, n=16) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (46.4 - 120.5, n=16) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=97, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (0.4987 - 1.236, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.192, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Office | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (2405 - 9694, n=16) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (7407 - 49934, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (415 - 2462, n=16) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (29405 - 76736, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (2135 - 6540, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (5113 - 23992, n=16) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Office (7860 - 155900, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (8849 - 90370, n=16) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (101.6 - 812, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (1154 - 5258, n=16) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (11873 - 43661, n=16) | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=98, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
系统性能
PCMark 10 的测试结果很稳定,但也显示出英特尔第 12 代芯片与 AMD 芯片相比的弱点。与目前的 英特尔超 7 155H显示了新一代处理器的性能。但与前代产品相比,结果要好 7%。在 Crossmark 测试中,目前的华为 MateBook 14 与宏碁 Swift Go 14 几乎不相上下,以 14% 的性能差距超越了前代产品。
我们对系统性能的主观印象没有发现任何问题,由于核心数量增加和多线程性能提高,即使打开多个 Windows 也不再是问题。系统运行流畅,我们在日常操作中没有发现任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4881 - 5345, n=11) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8890 - 10652, n=11) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6118 - 7058, n=11) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Office (1912 - 9773, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5169 - 6213, n=11) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1392 - 1553, n=7) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1393 - 1524, n=7) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1426 - 1647, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1267 - 1545, n=7) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (119.2 - 268, n=11) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (217 - 231, n=6) | |
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average of class Office (404 - 1966, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (575 - 1422, n=12) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5345 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (23312 - 70537, n=16) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (18989 - 70553, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 112436, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (23454 - 62496, n=16) | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (85.1 - 188.3, n=11) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Average of class Office (8.3 - 185.2, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
对于目前的华为 MateBook 14,你不得不接受在 DCP 延迟方面的一些重大妥协。
前代产品在此方面仍能取得非常好的效果,甚至适合实时无损音频和视频处理。遗憾的是,新机型已不再如此。虽然播放 4K 画质的 YouTube 视频没有任何问题,但该设备并不适合实时音频和视频处理。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
存储解决方案没有任何变化,这里使用的也是 M.2-2280 格式、容量为 512 GB 的三星 PM991 PCIe-3.0 NVMe SSD。因此,存储性能与 华为 MateBook 2021.
与去年的机型一样,华为将存储空间分为 C 分区和 D 分区,其中 C 分区仅提供 70 GB 的存储空间。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
显卡:降级为 Iris Xe G7 80EUs?
新款华为 MateBook 14 没有提供任何配备专用显卡的配置,仅使用集成的英特尔 Xe G7(80EUs)。相比之下 MateBook 14 2021仍然使用理论上更强大的 96EUs 版本。尽管集成显卡在纸面上看起来比去年的差一些,但在合成基准测试中性能却更好,或者说只差一点点。虽然当前的 MateBook 14 在 3DMark 11 中仅落后前代机型 2%,但在Cloud Gate 、Fire Strike 和Time Spy 基准测试中,当前的机型超过了前代机型。
除X-Plane 11.11 外,华为 MateBook 14 在所有游戏中的帧率都高于前代机型。在X-Plane 中,两款机型取得了相同的成绩。但这仍然表明,集成的英特尔 Iris 图形处理器并不适合游戏。AMD 的替代产品要强大得多,而新的英特尔 Arc iGPU 的 酷睿至尊 7 155H也达到了明显更高的数值。
与前代产品相比,性能更高的原因可能是采用了更高效、更新的处理器和更快的 DDR4-3733 内存。前代产品仍然使用 DDR4-3200 内存。最实用的是,在电池工作状态下图形性能不会下降。
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 26411 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 6443 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22166 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4345 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1561 points | |
Help |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Office (2.66 - 34, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Office (3.35 - 47.8, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Average of class Office (2.03 - 35.7, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Average of class Office (9.6 - 56.5, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average of class Office (8.4 - 121.2, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 117.8 | 105.8 | 21.8 | 9.5 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 87.6 | 52.7 | 29.2 | 13.8 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 114.4 | 87.3 | 50.7 | 46.5 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 39 | 22 | 14 | 10 | 6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 49.9 | 34.8 | 31 | |||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 52 | 27 | 25 | 23 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 74.4 | 32.2 | 25.9 | 20.6 |
排放与动力:更响亮的风扇带来更好的冷却效果
噪音排放
作为 前代机型
但一旦你转向要求更高的任务,风扇就会变得明显。在性能模式和高负载情况下,风扇转速会大幅提升,甚至会变得恼人。正如我们的 Cinebench 循环所显示的,当前型号处理器的冷却效果要好得多。我们测得前代产品在负载情况下的噪音仅为 40 dB(A),而现在的机型则高达近 48 dB(A),噪音明显增大。
因为 MateBook 显然想与 MacBook Air 直接竞争。 MacBook Air,这个数值其实并不理想,尤其是考虑到 MacBook Air 没有风扇,因此可以保持完全安静。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.5 / 25.5 / 25.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.37 / 47.75 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.5 dB(A) |
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | LG Gram 14Z90Q Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 Vega 8, R7 7730U, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | 1% | -4% | 0% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 25.5 | 25 2% | 25 2% | 26 -2% | 25 2% | 24.4 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.5 | 25 2% | 26 -2% | 26.2 -3% | 25 2% | 24.4 4% |
Idle Average * | 25.5 | 25 2% | 27 -6% | 26.2 -3% | 25 2% | 24.4 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.5 | 25 2% | 28 -10% | 26.2 -3% | 26.2 -3% | 25.7 -1% |
Load Average * | 33.37 | 35.4 -6% | 35 -5% | 38.4 -15% | 35.7 -7% | 31.8 5% |
Load Maximum * | 47.75 | 40.2 16% | 36 25% | 47.1 1% | 45.5 5% | 41.2 14% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 36 | 36.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
顶部的平均温度从 34 ° C 降至 31.1 ° C(93 ° F 降至 88 ° F),底部的平均温度从 34.2 ° C 降至 28.6 ° C(93.6 ° F 降至 83.5 ° F)。上一代产品底部的热点也被消除了,使您可以将 MateBook 放在膝盖上运行,即使在负载情况下也不会出现任何问题。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+1.5 °C / 2.7 F).
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU | Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | LG Gram 14Z90Q Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 4% | -2% | -2% | -34% | -5% | -6% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.5 | 44.5 -5% | 40 6% | 43 -1% | 47.6 -12% | 36.5 14% | 42.6 -0% |
Maximum Bottom * | 40.5 | 44.4 -10% | 47.1 -16% | 45 -11% | 57 -41% | 49.5 -22% | 55.3 -37% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.2 | 23.9 15% | 27.7 2% | 27 4% | 38.8 -38% | 25.5 10% | 25.8 9% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.6 | 23.6 17% | 28.7 -0% | 28 2% | 41 -43% | 35 -22% | 27.4 4% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
华为似乎对当前 MateBook 14 的扬声器进行了一些额外的校准。
扬声器的音量提高了近 11 dB(A),低音也略显有力。另一方面,中音略显突出。虽然扬声器很实用,但你不能指望它创造奇迹。它们的声音仍然过于尖锐,尽管今年有所改进,但仍然谈不上真正的低音。不过,扬声器完全可以满足日常使用需求。不过,在低音和极高音方面,MateBook 还是被 MacBook 超越了。 MacBook.
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.33 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
虽然前代产品待机时的功耗仍为 0.4 瓦,但新机型现在的功耗为 0.85 瓦。空闲运行时的平均耗电量也略高,为 9.5 瓦。在最大负载情况下,耗电量从 66 瓦增至 67.5 瓦。即使某些短暂的消耗峰值略高于 65 瓦,但附带的 65 瓦充电器通常仍然足够使用。
Off / Standby | / 0.85 Watt |
Idle | 4.3 / 9.5 / 10.73 Watt |
Load |
/ 67.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption With External Monitor
电池寿命
MateBook 14 的电池续航时间仍然令人略感失望,甚至比前代产品略差。 前代由于功耗增加。在 WLAN 测试中,这款 14 英寸笔记本电脑的续航时间为 9:09 小时。如果使用 AMD 处理器,续航时间可能会更长。
在与所选竞争对手的比较中,只有 戴尔 XPS 13 Plus 9320表现较差。除此之外,除了 LG Gram 14之外,与我们进行比较的 Windows 机型的性能相差无几。但与 MacBook Air M2相比,MateBook 明显处于劣势。至少,MateBook 提供的快速充电模式可以稍稍弥补电池的不足。
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024) i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 56 Wh | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2, M2 8-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | LG Gram 14Z90Q i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 72 Wh | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 55 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 R7 7730U, Vega 8, 57 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 57% | 8% | 51% | -8% | -10% | 14% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 549 | 910 66% | 562 2% | 712 30% | 480 -13% | 594 8% | 595 ? 8% |
Load | 98 | 144 47% | 111 13% | 169 72% | 96 -2% | 71 -28% | 117.5 ? 20% |
H.264 | 989 | 531 | 645 | 704 ? | |||
Reader / Idle | 1736 | 1300 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论:不是 MacBook,但价格也不像Apple 设备
华为 MateBook 14 是一款体积小巧的超极本,它采用 3:2 格式的显示屏非常适合用户使用。反光显示屏表面是一个小缺点,尽管它能让色彩显得更加鲜艳。尽管采用了高质量的铝制外壳,但重量与其他 14 英寸笔记本相比略高。触摸板设计得非常好,键盘也能可靠地完成任务。虽然电池续航时间可以做得更好,但根据不同的使用情况,仍可维持整个工作日的使用。在执行日常任务时,该机使用的英特尔芯片可以让操作非常流畅。在去年,我们无法看到与 AMD 版本相比的任何优势,因此无法推荐英特尔版本。但新款 MateBook 14 只提供英特尔版本,因此我们以前的推荐不再有效。这款超小型笔记本虽然与其他高端机型相比性能不尽如人意,但仍能提供稳定的性能。但由于它的价格明显较低,而且经常可以找到售价仅为 800 欧元(约合人民币 872 元)的机型,因此也不一定再期待它有更高的性能。
华为 MateBook 14 是一款高品质、价格特别实惠的超极本,性能稳定,值得推荐。
与前代产品一样,在 MacBook Air 和 MateBook 14 之间做出选择在很大程度上取决于您是否需要使用某些 Windows 专用软件。如果不是这种情况,对大多数人来说,MacBook Air 是更好的选择,因为它的显示屏、电池、扬声器和音量都要好得多。但 MacBook Air M2价格也高出许多。另一个不错的选择可能是 MacBook Air M1只要它还能买到。
另一方面,对于那些喜欢 Windows 设备并希望拥有真正出色的触摸显示屏的用户来说,在这个价位的产品中,能提供高品质铝合金外壳和出色做工的竞争者寥寥无几。虽然 戴尔 XPS 13 9320例如,戴尔 XPS 13 9320 提供了类似的高品质外壳,但性能却无法与 MateBook 相提并论,而且价格也高出很多。LG Gram 14Z90Q LG Gram 14Z90Q的电池续航时间明显更长,重量也更轻,但在基准测试中的表现却不如 MateBook,而且外壳的坚固性也大打折扣。此外,它在网络销售商处很难找到。同价位最强大的竞争对手无疑是 联想 ThinkPad E14 G5因为 Ryzen 处理器几乎在所有方面都有更好的表现。虽然它的显示屏盖也是铝制的,但整个底座是塑料制成的。MateBook 的外壳质量明显更高,这再次表明,在这个价位的产品中很难找到一款整体性能同样出色的产品。
价格和供应情况
配备英特尔酷睿 i5-1240P、16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘的华为 MateBook 14 在德国华为专卖店有售,价格为 829 欧元(约合 904 美元),目前有返利。
,制造商目前没有提供其他版本,也没有在美国上市。
Huawei MateBook 14 (2024)
- 01/16/2024 v7 (old)
Philip Macdonald
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.