Notebookcheck Logo
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024

华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024) 评测--配备磨砂显示屏和强大功能的 12.2 英寸平板电脑

价格是Apple 的两倍。

抗反射显示屏亮度为 2000 尼特,刷新率为 144 赫兹,还免费赠送扩展坞键盘:这些特点使得华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 在竞争中很不受欢迎。另一方面,这款 12.2 英寸平板电脑虽然功能丰富,但价格相对便宜,因此买家可以兴奋起来。不过,华为 MatePad Pro 也有一些缺点--关键词就是谷歌 Play 商店。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Touchscreen

结论 - 性能卓越,价格公道

华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 是一款功能强大的平板电脑。PaperMatte 版拥有令人印象深刻的 144-Hz 雾面显示屏,几乎不会产生恼人的反光。由于采用了串联 OLED 显示屏,它的峰值亮度超过 2000 cd/m²,是目前最亮的平板电脑之一。

尽管尺寸达到了 12.2 英寸,但做工精湛的 MatePad Pro 12.2 却非常轻巧,重量仅为 512 克,而且是同类产品中最薄的平板电脑之一,机身高度仅为 5.5 毫米。方便的是,该设备本身还附带了一个扩展坞键盘,该键盘带有触摸板,打字时手感很好。此外,使用选配的 M-Pencil 在磨砂显示屏上书写和绘画也非常直观。

遗憾的是,这款平板电脑也有一些缺点。MatePad Pro 12.2 只使用了中端 SoC,性能明显低于同价位平板电脑。此外,它的更新供应仍不明确,没有蜂窝网络选项,开箱即缺少所有谷歌应用程序。不过,这些应用程序可以稍后通过极光应用商店安装。

Pros

+ 哑光超亮显示屏
+ 144 赫兹刷新率
+ 轻巧纤薄
+ 高品质
+ 512 GB 存储空间
+ 随附键盘
+ 电池续航时间长
+ 快速充电

Cons

- 更新交付不明确
- 无手机选项
- 没有谷歌应用程序
- 只有中档 SoC
- 无 IP 等级
- 无 6 GHz 无线局域网

价格和供应情况

在美国,华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 无法直接从制造商处购买,但您可以从阿里速卖通等零售商处订购,目前的优惠价为 670.53 美元。.

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Geizhals
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
82.3%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W ⎘
HiSilicon Maleoon 910 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Bestpreis 999€ Alternate
2. 999€ galaxus
3. 999€ Huawei Shop
512 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.20"
2800x1840
274 PPI
OLED
2.
84.8%
Honor MagicPad 2
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Bestpreis 459.99€ Universal Versand
2. 459.99€ OTTO Österreich
3. 525.9€ alza.de
555 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.30"
3000x1920
290 PPI
OLED
3.
86.1%
OnePlus Pad 2
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Bestpreis 449€ Proshop.at
2. 449€ Proshop.de
3. 450€ Gomibo.de
584 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.10"
3000x2120
304 PPI
IPS
4.
85.2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Bestpreis 929€ GSMshop.at
2. 931.13€ haym.infotec
3. 931.99€ electronis.de
571 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash12.40"
2800x1752
266 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
5.
89.3% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Listenpreis 700€590 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash12.40"
3048x2032
294 PPI
IPS

平板电脑和防眩光显示屏这两样东西通常不会放在一起。然而,华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 却能做到这一点。PaperMatte 版是一款 12.2 英寸平板电脑,配备了由明亮的 OLED 面板组成的亚光屏幕,根据制造商的说法,其亮度应达到破纪录的 2000 cd/m²。但这并不是华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 的全部,因为它还支持输入笔,刷新率高达 144 Hz。此外,华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 还配备了 Glide Keyboard,这是一款集成触摸板的扩展坞键盘。

华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 的价格也很吸引人。仅有的一个版本配备了 12GB 内存和 512GB 存储空间,售价略高于 1,000 美元。在测试期间,如果直接从华为购买平板电脑,还可以免费获得可选的 M-Pencil 手写笔。

规格

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 (MatePad Pro Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W 12 x 1.5 - 2.5 GHz
Graphics adapter
HiSilicon Maleoon 910
Memory
12 GB 
Display
12.20 inch 3:2, 2800 x 1840 pixel 274 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, OLED, PaperMatte Display, 1000 nits full-screen brightness, 2000 nits peak HDR brightness, 2880 Hz PWM dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 481 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, hall sensor, compass, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Limited
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.5 x 271.25 x 182.53
Battery
10100 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Huawei HarmonyOS
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/1.8, AF) + 8 MP Ultrawide (f/2.2, FF, LED Flash), video recording up to 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, FF), video recording up to 4K@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: quad speakers, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable (USB 2.0), Keyboard, Quick start guide, HarmonyOS 4.2, 24 Months Warranty, HDR10, HLG, DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
512 g, Power Supply: 135 g
Price
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 重量轻、厚度薄,由金属制成

华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 重量仅为 512 克,是目前市场上最轻的 12.x 英寸平板电脑之一。同时,它还拥有超薄设计,厚度仅为 5.5 毫米,仅次于少数竞争对手。这些竞争对手包括 Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024)厚度为 5.1 毫米,以及 三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra的厚度为 5.4 毫米。

MatePad Pro 12.2 的铝镁合金外壳虽然设计纤薄,但非常坚固,即使施加很大的力量也很难扭曲或凹陷。我们的测试设备是金色款,玻璃纤维制成的金属磨砂表面让它看起来非常漂亮。此外,它还具有丝滑的手感,不易沾染指纹。此外,华为还提供黑色后盖的平板电脑。

MatePad Pro 12.2 的边框非常纤薄,四边宽度仅约 5 毫米,因此屏占比高达 92%。尽管如此,华为仍设法将自拍摄像头集成到边框中。平板电脑的电源按钮也很节省空间,因为它还内置了指纹传感器。选配的触控笔可通过磁力吸附在平板电脑的顶部,并在此充电。

华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)

尺寸比较

285.4 mm 185.4 mm 5.6 mm 571 g278.7 mm 191.58 mm 6.26 mm 590 g274.5 mm 180.5 mm 5.8 mm 555 g271.25 mm 182.53 mm 5.5 mm 512 g268.7 mm 195 mm 6.49 mm 584 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - MatePad Pro 12.2 只有一种存储版本

MatePad Pro 12.2 只有一个存储版本,华为为此收取的费用仅为 1000 多美元。它拥有 12 GB 内存和 512 GB 存储空间,配置相当丰富。无法通过 microSD 卡扩展内部存储空间的问题几乎不存在。

这款轻薄的华为平板电脑有 4 个扬声器,其中两个位于其短边。MatePad Pro 12.2 拥有一系列可靠的功能,包括 WiFi 6、蓝牙 5.2、用于高清流媒体的 DRM Widevine L1 和快速 USB 3.0 端口。在三星 980 Pro 测试固态硬盘的复制测试中,USB 端口的数据传输速率达到了约 253 MB/s。平板电脑能识别外部数据载体,即使它们是用 exFAT 或 NTFS 文件系统格式化的。

平板电脑还可以通过 USB 端口连接显示器。不过,你只能镜像其桌面。MatePad Pro 12.2 缺乏完善的功能,如桌面模式(这将非常适合显示屏尺寸)以及支持蜂窝网络的版本。

左:带指纹传感器的电源按钮、扬声器
左:带指纹传感器的电源按钮、扬声器
右:扬声器、USB-C
右:扬声器、USB-C
顶部:麦克风、音量摇杆
顶部:麦克风、音量摇杆
底部:无连接
底部:无连接

软件 - 访问 Google Play 商店的技巧

这款平板电脑运行基于Android 12 的华为内部操作系统 HarmonyOS 4.2 版。与标准的Android 相比,HarmonyOS 附带了一些实用的额外功能,包括以窗口而非全屏方式运行应用程序、根据需要调整应用程序大小以及将应用程序放置在桌面上的任意位置等选项。

由于华为因制裁而被列入谷歌黑名单,MatePad Pro 12.2 缺少所有谷歌移动服务(GMS),包括谷歌 Play 商店。你仍然可以安装 Chrome 浏览器或 YouTube 等谷歌应用程序,但必须绕一个小弯才能实现。 本文说明了如何做到这一点。

我们在 MatePad Pro 12.2 上使用了文中介绍的方法之一,即通过华为的 AppGallery 应用商店安装极光应用商店。极光应用商店是 Google Play 应用商店的替代品,但它使用后者的应用程序数据库,并直接从那里下载 APK。

华为尚未提供有关 MatePad Pro 12.2 多久会收到更新的任何信息。在 11 月中旬进行测试时,Android 安全补丁截至 11 月 1 日。

华为 MatePad Pro 12.2
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2

可持续性

华为尚未公布太多有关可持续发展的信息。该制造商没有提供任何有关材料提取的具体信息,但它强调在这方面遵守所有法律安全要求。华为还提供电子废弃物回收计划。

华为使用经 FSC(森林管理委员会)认证的纸张包装产品,从而保证材料来自负责任管理的森林。MatePad Pro 12.2 的包装上有 FSC Mix 标志。这意味着它使用的材料来自 FSC 认证的森林和/或回收材料,以及受控来源的材料。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - GPS 性能良好,但没有 6 GHz 无线局域网和蜂窝网络连接

MatePad Pro 12.2 的 WiFi 6 模块在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器时实现了稳定的传输速率,5 GHz 频段的峰值略高于 1000 MBit/s。

不过,几乎所有对比设备的传输速率都更高。三星 三星Galaxy Tab S10+OnePlus Pad 2小米 Pad 6S Pro也可以使用 6 GHz 频段,数据吞吐量明显更高。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1009 (500min - 1049max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
994 (974min - 1012max) MBit/s -1%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Wi-Fi 7
953 (870min - 981max) MBit/s -6%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (305 - 1757, n=122)
870 MBit/s -14%
Honor MagicPad 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
867 (453min - 934max) MBit/s -14%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1710, n=82, last 2 years)
544 MBit/s -46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
956 (844min - 986max) MBit/s +18%
Honor MagicPad 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
937 (892min - 952max) MBit/s +16%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1696, n=120)
834 MBit/s +3%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
807 (629min - 876max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Wi-Fi 7
778 (542min - 819max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1705, n=82, last 2 years)
523 MBit/s -35%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1759 (1709min - 1788max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1620 (1070min - 1792max) MBit/s
Average of class Tablet
  (691 - 1888, n=14, last 2 years)
1368 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (770 - 1902, n=18)
1294 MBit/s
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
895 (675min - 1017max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1782 (936min - 1875max) MBit/s
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
1652 (1472min - 1703max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1437 (1239min - 1549max) MBit/s
Average of class Tablet
  (666 - 1842, n=16, last 2 years)
1351 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (666 - 1816, n=20)
1166 MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1759 (1709-1788)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1746 (936-1875)
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø993 (500-1049)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø994 (974-1012)
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø807 (629-876)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø953 (844-986)
室内 GPS 接收
室内 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收

华为平板电脑在单频模式下支持 GPS、Glonass、北斗、伽利略和 QZSS 卫星导航服务。在我们的测试中,它能比较准确地定位我们当前的位置,因此非常适合导航任务。在一次 10 公里的自行车骑行中,它对我们的定位不如 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表那么精确,但另一方面,它也没有犯什么大错,最差也就偏离了几米。

GPS 测试:总结
GPS 测试:总结
GPS 测试:环湖旅行
GPS 测试:环湖旅行
GPS 测试:转折点
GPS 测试:转折点

摄像头 - 配备 1300 万像素摄像头的华为 MatePad Pro 12.2

使用自拍相机拍摄的照片
使用自拍相机拍摄的照片

前置 800 万像素摄像头位于平板电脑的显示屏边框内,并采用固定焦距,非常不起眼。其图像质量尚可,足以满足视频聊天的需要。自拍摄像头最多可录制每秒 30 帧的 4K 视频。1080p 和 720p 两种较低分辨率也无法实现更高的帧率。

除了 LED 闪光灯外,后盖上的圆形摄像头模块还包含两个主镜头:一个光圈为 f/1.8 的 1300 万像素摄像头和一个 800 万像素超广角摄像头(f/2.2)。这两个镜头均未使用光学图像稳定器。

主摄像头在光线良好的条件下也能拍出清晰的照片。其图像清晰度和细节水平远不及同价位的智能手机。不过,从图像对比中可以看出,它比其他一些 12.x 英寸平板电脑的效果要好。例如 Honor MagicPad 2三星Galaxy Tab S10+在图像质量方面都比不上 MatePad Pro 12.2。

另一方面,在我们的测试中,主摄像头的色彩平衡效果很不稳定。根据拍摄对象的不同,照片有时看起来有点过冷,有时又有点过热。使用数码变焦拍摄的照片看起来也不是很好,在弱光环境下几乎无法使用相机。相反,视频效果不错,但没有光学防抖功能。4K 下的最高速度为 30fps,1080p 和 720p 下的最高速度为 60fps。

超广角摄像头表现不俗,但 8 百万像素传感器限制了其拍摄能力。不过,它完全适合拍摄文本和文件。

使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo

在可控的照明条件下,主相机显示出它能够精确捕捉色彩。在最佳照明条件下,与参考颜色的偏差非常小(最大 Delta-E 值为 11.86),测试图也能完整再现。然而,在 1 勒克斯的残余光照条件下,相机就完全放弃了,因为测试图和 ColorChecker 色度图都在黑暗中完全消失了。

ColorChecker
2.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024: 6.55 ∆E min: 2.89 - max: 11.86 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.9 ∆E
71.7 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024: 47.6 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.85 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包括滑动键盘

100 瓦电源
100 瓦电源

许多其他平板电脑制造商对磁性扩展坞键盘等配件收费不菲。相比之下,MatePad Pro 12.2 随附了这样一个 QWERTY 键盘,即华为 Glide 键盘。

此外,还包括一个 100 瓦的电源适配器、一块抛光布、一条 USB 电缆(USB-A 转 USB-C)和一些信息宣传单。在撰写本文时,如果您直接从华为订购平板电脑,您可以将第三代华为 M-Pencil 免费添加到购物车。

华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 提供 12 个月的标准保修服务。

输入设备与操作 - 配备灵活脚架的华为平板电脑

华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 通过磁力吸附在 420 克重的 Glide 键盘上,键盘由软塑料制成。与华为 M-Pencil 一样,键盘和平板电脑通过华为的蓝牙替代方案 NearLink 无线连接。其特别之处在于,即使平板电脑没有与 Glide 键盘物理连接,键盘和触摸板输入也能被识别。在我们的测试中,这在几米远的地方也能正常工作。

扩展坞键盘的键程较大,使用起来非常舒适。它的触摸板也同样漂亮、宽大,由于集成了按键,它就像 "真正的 "笔记本电脑触摸板一样好用。只要触摸一下,平板电脑屏幕上就会出现鼠标指针。触摸板支持多点触控手势,例如可以放大照片和拖动应用程序窗口到不同的位置。

Glide 键盘的脚架可让平板电脑与键盘保持不同的角度,所有这些都让平板电脑呈现出经典的笔记本电脑外形。此外,还支持所谓的工作室形状。这需要将平板电脑向前拉,直到它非常平整地位于键盘上方。由于保持了一个微小的角度,这种设置特别适合绘图。

据制造商称,第三代 M-Pencil 支持多达 10,000 级压力,对于某些应用程序,还支持 16,384 级压力感应手写功能。OLED 面板 144 Hz 的帧频和磨砂玻璃表面的结合确保了出色的书写和绘图性能。如果使用手写笔在搜索栏中书写,平板电脑会自动将输入内容转换为文本。

触控笔可安装在键盘单元上方一个特殊设计的凹槽中。当 Glide 键盘关闭时,触控笔被封闭起来,在运输过程中不会意外丢失。

MatePad Pro 12.2 可以通过集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器进行生物识别解锁,这种解锁方式运行可靠,在关闭屏幕时也可以进行解锁。也可以通过自拍摄像头进行 2D 面部识别,但这种方法的安全性较低。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘
Glide 键盘的脚架可让经典的笔记本电脑轮廓和...
Glide 键盘的脚架可让经典的笔记本电脑轮廓和...
......工作室的形状特别平整,非常适合绘画。
......工作室的形状特别平整,非常适合绘画。
Glide 键盘和华为 M-Pencil
Glide 键盘和华为 M-Pencil
华为手写笔可识别多达 16,384 级压力。
华为手写笔可识别多达 16,384 级压力。

显示屏 - 如承诺般闪亮

MatePad Pro 12.2 的一大亮点是其分辨率为 2,800 x 1,840 像素的 OLED 面板。这不仅仅是因为它的刷新率高达 144 Hz,而其他平板电脑能做到这一点的并不多。3:2 屏幕还有两个特别之处:哑光表面和高亮度,制造商称亮度高达 2000 cd/m²。

一种特殊的表面处理方法在 OLED 面板上添加了纳米级的不规则颗粒,确保屏幕表面能够漫反射进入的光线,因此几乎不会出现反光。目前只有Apple 为 iPad Pro 提供了类似的功能,但价格要高得多。在那里,哑光选项被命名为纳米纹理玻璃,但只能在 1 TB 和 2 TB 版本中选择,这意味着你需要为这样一台最便宜的 iPad Pro 支付大约 2000 美元。

MatePad Pro 12.2 的玻璃表面下并非只有一块 OLED 面板,而是有两块。这使平板电脑屏幕的亮度达到了许多竞争对手梦寐以求的水平。在显示纯白背景时,3:2 显示屏的平均亮度为 1,003 cd/m²,而当我们将测量限制在较小的图像部分(APL18)时,亮度最高可达 2,284 cd/m²。在 HDR 模式下,其最大亮度甚至更高一些,达到 2,422 cd/m²。因此,MatePad Pro 12.2 可以呈现令人印象深刻的 HDR 效果。

MatePad Pro 12.2 通过脉宽调制(PWM)来调节显示屏亮度,这使得屏幕闪烁不可避免。不过,在我们测量的所有亮度级别中,360 Hz 的 PWM 频率都相当高,因此即使是敏感用户在使用过程中也不会遇到任何问题。

同时,该平板电脑还使用了 2,880 Hz 的标称 PWM 调光频率,以进一步降低 PWM 的影响。我们测量发现,调光频率为 2,777 Hz(在屏幕亮度为 36% 时测量),与制造商的规格非常接近。

990
cd/m²
984
cd/m²
993
cd/m²
995
cd/m²
988
cd/m²
990
cd/m²
1031
cd/m²
1021
cd/m²
1036
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1036 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1003.1 cd/m² Minimum: 6.18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 988 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
OLED, 2800x1840, 12.2"
Honor MagicPad 2
OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3"
OnePlus Pad 2
IPS, 3000x2120, 12.1"
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2800x1752, 12.4"
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
IPS, 3048x2032, 12.4"
Screen
-6%
-34%
-68%
-45%
Brightness middle
988
645
-35%
833
-16%
471
-52%
867
-12%
Brightness
1003
650
-35%
771
-23%
473
-53%
810
-19%
Brightness Distribution
95
94
-1%
84
-12%
97
2%
87
-8%
Black Level *
0.45
0.58
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
1.3
-8%
1.79
-49%
3.1
-158%
2
-67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.5
2.1
16%
4.01
-60%
5.8
-132%
5.5
-120%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
1.5
29%
3
-43%
2.4
-14%
3
-43%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.25 98%
2.254 98%
2.06 107%
2.29 96%
CCT
6882 94%
6658 98%
6419 101%
6746 96%
6957 93%
Contrast
1851
1495

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 360 Hz
Amplitude: 27.4 %
Secondary Frequency: 2777 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。

OLED 面板的色彩描绘可在显示设置中使用 "正常 "或 "鲜艳"两种色彩配置文件进行调整。屏幕还能根据环境光照条件自动调节色温。在正常色彩模式下,平板电脑可提供最佳画质。(Delta-E色彩和灰度各<3)。

色彩精度(色彩模式正常、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩精度(色彩模式正常、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式正常、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式正常、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
灰度(色彩模式正常、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
灰度(色彩模式正常、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩饱和度(色彩模式正常、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩饱和度(色彩模式正常、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.93 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4635 ms rise
↘ 0.462 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.09 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.429 ms rise
↘ 1.657 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

从外观上看,MatePad Pro 12.2 是一款不可忽视的产品,因为它的磨砂显示屏即使在非常明亮的环境光线下也能轻松阅读内容。它的视角稳定性也非常好。即使从更广的角度观看,图像也能保持真实的色彩,不会明显变暗。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 只配备了中端 SoC

华为似乎对 MatePad Pro 12.2 的 SoC 一直保密。不过,我们使用了 Aida64 和 CPU-Z 等应用程序,以确定引擎盖下运行的是 12 核处理器。基准测试表明,SoC 的性能与 海思麒麟 9000W基本相同。MatePad Pro 12.2 的时钟频率略有不同,但总体上几乎没有差别。

就其价格范围而言,华为平板电脑的性能并不特别高。即便如此,它仍能提供稳定的中端性能,而且由于内核众多,处理器在多核基准测试中表现尤为出色。

在日常使用中,HarmonyOS 和已安装的应用程序都能流畅运行。尽管如此,竞争对手如 三星Galaxy Tab S10+小米 Pad 6S Pro等竞争对手的性能储备要强得多。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2167 Points +61%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1986 Points +48%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1924 Points +43%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
1343 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (1174 - 1343, n=4)
1248 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)
1093 Points -19%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
954 Points -29%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7094 Points +62%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
5176 Points +18%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5166 Points +18%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4564 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
4370 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (3987 - 4370, n=4)
4109 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)
3518 Points -19%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1632 Points +62%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1477 Points +47%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1447 Points +44%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
1006 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (867 - 1006, n=3)
946 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1887, n=70, last 2 years)
712 Points -29%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
6678 Points +69%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
4548 Points +15%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4460 Points +13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
3951 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (3694 - 3951, n=3)
3841 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8624, n=70, last 2 years)
2508 Points -37%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1726681 Points +135%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1516127 Points +106%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1432569 Points +95%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2716980, n=36, last 2 years)
759506 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
734965 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (678210 - 734965, n=2)
706588 Points -4%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
17329 Points +25%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
16960 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16684 Points +20%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
13858 Points
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12156 Points -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (10620 - 13858, n=4)
12057 Points -13%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=72, last 2 years)
9873 Points -29%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1342 Points +31%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1155 Points +12%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1153 Points +12%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
1028 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (834 - 1028, n=4)
927 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=62, last 2 years)
779 Points -24%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11606 Points +80%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9147 Points +42%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
8483 Points +31%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
6464 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (5821 - 6464, n=4)
6238 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (444 - 11721, n=58, last 2 years)
4238 Points -34%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
15736 Points +48%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13141 Points +24%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
12668 Points +19%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
10623 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (10428 - 10785, n=4)
10571 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (1103 - 16435, n=58, last 2 years)
7305 Points -31%
Memory
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
10977 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
10633 Points +27%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
10049 Points +20%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
8352 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (7687 - 8362, n=4)
8118 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (916 - 10977, n=58, last 2 years)
4900 Points -41%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
57192 Points +360%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
25642 Points +106%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
23041 Points +85%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
12436 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (10876 - 12763, n=4)
12155 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet
  (580 - 57192, n=58, last 2 years)
9295 Points -25%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1938 Points +23%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1893 Points +20%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1766 Points +12%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
1582 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (1255 - 1582, n=4)
1479 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2051, n=58, last 2 years)
1272 Points -20%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
74821 Points +571%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
14961 Points +34%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13900 Points +25%
Average of class Tablet
  (1662 - 74821, n=56, last 2 years)
11456 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
11155 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (10373 - 11155, n=4)
10812 Points -3%
AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
54948 Points +6012%
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)
7290 Points +711%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1231 Points +37%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1118 Points +24%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
899 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (738 - 927, n=4)
828 Points -8%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1225 Points +240%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1065 Points +196%
Average of class Tablet
  (243 - 1243, n=8, last 2 years)
705 Points +96%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (360 - 387, n=3)
374 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
360 Points
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
243 Points -32%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
5176 Points +1322%
Average of class Tablet
  (227 - 5204, n=8, last 2 years)
1683 Points +362%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
981 Points +170%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (364 - 388, n=3)
377 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
364 Points
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
227 Points -38%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
4998 Points +587%
Average of class Tablet
  (508 - 4998, n=8, last 2 years)
2014 Points +177%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1693 Points +133%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  (727 - 837, n=3)
799 Points +10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
727 Points
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
508 Points -30%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average of class Tablet
  (390 - 7341, n=2, last 2 years)
3866 Points +891%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
390 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
  ()
390 Points 0%

马龙 海思马龙 910GPU 已经用了几年,和 SoC 一样,没有超过中端水平。因此,在图形基准测试中,MatePad Pro 12.2 几乎总是排在后面。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5289 Points +346%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4454 Points +275%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3218 Points +171%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3088 Points +160%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1187 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5236 Points +336%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4485 Points +273%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3421 Points +185%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3301 Points +175%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1202 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18352 Points +312%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12985 Points +191%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12952 Points +191%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4457 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4465 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7451 Points +29%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7196 Points +25%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6219 Points +8%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5778 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5627 Points -3%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28816 Points +274%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24769 Points +222%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21647 Points +181%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20808 Points +170%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7700 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17279 Points +141%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16323 Points +128%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13954 Points +95%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13009 Points +81%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7170 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
144 fps +60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +33%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
767 fps +178%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
520 fps +88%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
397 fps +44%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
276 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +85%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +85%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -8%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
265 fps +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps +84%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
249 fps +75%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
142 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +188%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +73%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +48%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
219 fps +107%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
200 fps +89%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps +71%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps +271%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps +100%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +100%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
135 fps +193%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
110 fps +139%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps +130%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +319%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +163%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps +119%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps +119%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps +213%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps +200%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps +143%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps +139%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +237%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps +107%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +96%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps +85%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
176 fps +175%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
170 fps +166%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
146 fps +128%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +125%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps +250%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +220%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26 fps +160%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps +140%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10 fps

MatePad Pro 12.2 可以让你快速上网。不过,在浏览器基准测试中,华为平板电脑的表现并不突出,既没有取得创纪录的成绩,也没有垫底冲过终点线。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
177.483 Points +14%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
176.366 Points +13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 (Chrome 130.0.6723.102)
155.836 Points
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
134.356 Points -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (89.5 - 155.8, n=4)
112.1 Points -28%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=68, last 2 years)
109.8 Points -30%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
256 runs/min +23%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
225 runs/min +8%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 (Chrome 130.0.6723.102)
208 runs/min
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
197 runs/min -5%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=62, last 2 years)
116.9 runs/min -44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (62.7 - 208, n=3)
112.9 runs/min -46%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
15.2 runs/min +22%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=24, last 2 years)
12.8 runs/min +2%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 (Chrome 130.0.6723.102)
12.5 runs/min
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
12.2 runs/min -2%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
11.9 runs/min -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (3.11 - 12.5, n=3)
7.14 runs/min -43%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
190 Points +19%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
167 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 (Chrome 130.0.6723.102)
160 Points
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
155 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (85 - 160, n=4)
116 Points -27%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=67, last 2 years)
105.2 Points -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
67938 Points +46%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
64638 Points +38%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 (Chrome 130.0.6723.102)
46687 Points
OnePlus Pad 2 (Chrome 128)
45083 Points -3%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
42032 Points -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (32134 - 46687, n=4)
37658 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=85, last 2 years)
28868 Points -38%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years)
3794 ms * -354%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W (836 - 1244, n=4)
1076 ms * -29%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
842.2 ms * -1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 (Chrome 130.0.6723.102)
836.4 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
639.3 ms * +24%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
602 ms * +28%

* ... smaller is better

平板电脑的 UFS 3.1 存储可确保较短的加载时间和快速启动应用程序。三星 三星Galaxy Tab S10+小米 Pad 6S Pro速度更快。

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Honor MagicPad 2OnePlus Pad 2Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAverage 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
3%
-9%
-9%
54%
-17%
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB
1925.89
2025.54
5%
2003.1
4%
3574.3
86%
3465.72
80%
Sequential Write 256KB
1461.8
2003.53
37%
1732.7
19%
554.67
-62%
3154.3
116%
1199 ?(575 - 1876, n=27)
-18%
Random Read 4KB
313.92
298.27
-5%
236.5
-25%
218.43
-30%
381.97
22%
282 ?(208 - 386, n=27)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
531.89
401.95
-24%
348.6
-34%
374.09
-30%
510.95
-4%
338 ?(221 - 532, n=27)
-36%

游戏 - 可以进行流畅的游戏

MatePad Pro 12.2 可能没有最快的 SoC,但目前的游戏仍能在平板电脑上流畅运行。我们用《源氏冲击》和《PUBG Mobile》在不同的图形设置下进行了测试。

在最高细节级别下,《源氏冲击》的平均运行帧数接近每秒 49 帧,没有卡顿或其他延迟。在最低图形设置下,我们注意到帧数几乎保持在每秒 60 帧。

事实证明,《PUBG Mobile》的帧速率进展更为流畅。在高清和流畅模式下,该平板电脑的帧数为每秒 60 帧,在最大可选的UltraHDR/Ultra设置下为每秒 40 帧。它可以提供更高的 FPS,但却被游戏拖慢了速度。

我们使用Gamebench 测试了游戏帧率。.

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.1.0_27118081_27297621: Ø59.3 (53-60)
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.1.0_27118081_27297621: Ø48.9 (41-59)
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.4.0: Ø59.7 (58-60)
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.4.0: Ø59.7 (56-60)
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.4.0: Ø39.8 (38-41)

排放 - 始终使用冷却片

温度

MatePad Pro 12.2 在运行过程中始终保持低温。即使在极端情况下,即平板电脑运行烧毁基准测试长达一小时,并因此发挥了最大性能,其表面温度最终也仅达到 38 °C以下。3DMark 压力测试表明,平板电脑的内部温度也没有降低,几乎在任何时候都能提供最高性能。

Max. Load
 38.1 °C37.2 °C30.1 °C 
 32.6 °C31.5 °C29.2 °C 
 30.2 °C30 °C30.1 °C 
Maximum: 38.1 °C
Average: 32.1 °C
29.2 °C34 °C37.3 °C
29.7 °C32.9 °C33.2 °C
28.9 °C30.4 °C31.3 °C
Maximum: 37.3 °C
Average: 31.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 %
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.9 % -8%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 % -23%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.6 % -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63.2 % -37%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 %
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.3 % -8%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89.3 % -10%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.8 % -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.5 % -40%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.8 %
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
93.7 %
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.9 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.1 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.9 %
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.5 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61.9 %
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
%
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø7.2 (7.19-7.22)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.6 (17.7-29.7)
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø26.6 (26.6-26.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64.9 (58.9-93.1)
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø26.5 (26.4-26.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.1 (60.1-107.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø18.2 (16.5-25.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø17.8 (16.1-24.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.17 (8.34-13.5)
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2

发言人

MatePad Pro 12.2 的 4 个扬声器可产生立体声音效,音量大而不失真。不过,你听不到太多的低音,所以音乐和电影听起来不是最震撼的。

外接音频设备可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.2 与平板电脑连接。平板电脑支持的蓝牙编解码器通常无法在开发者选项中找到。华为只在规格中列出了 AAC、SBC 和 LDAC 等标准编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.444.22531.833.23129.930.14030.929.55037.937.56329.730.88021.440.410021.35112520.356.41601767.220015.465.125013.363.631512.966.840012.769.650011.376.763011.975.480011.974.810001374.1125012.876.1160012.379.8200014.577.5250013.178.7315013.470.940001369.8500013.467630013.966.8800013.671.51000013.772.31250013.376.51600012.867.8SPL25.487.3N0.772.5median 13.3median 71.5Delta1.24.243.439.631.832.829.932.330.926.937.939.629.728.221.437.421.347.220.352.1176415.463.313.367.612.969.812.768.211.373.111.972.511.9741375.512.875.312.374.614.569.713.165.813.469.91375.813.475.713.975.813.67313.766.713.359.212.862.825.485.60.769.8median 13.3median 69.81.25hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - MatePad Pro 12.2 具有良好的续航时间

耗电量

MatePad Pro 12.2 的双芯电池容量为 10,100 毫安时,充电功率高达 100 瓦(20V/5A)。通过随机提供的电源适配器充电速度尤其快,因为它支持 SuperCharge 快速充电模式,但必须手动激活。在我们的测试中,一个充电周期大约需要一个小时。

在功耗方面,华为平板电脑表现正常。在空闲状态下,它通常只会消耗一点电池电量,但在负载情况下会变得耗电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.18 / 0.41 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.49 / 6.42 / 6.61 Watt
Load midlight 7.58 / 11.83 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
10100 mAh
Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
10090 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
10000 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-17%
-14%
-18%
-13%
12%
Idle Minimum *
2.49
3.6
-45%
3.05
-22%
1.22
51%
3.07 ?(1.53 - 4.66, n=4)
-23%
Idle Average *
6.42
6.52
-2%
4.57
29%
7.18
-12%
7.28 ?(5.96 - 9.06, n=4)
-13%
Idle Maximum *
6.61
6.54
1%
4.65
30%
8.22
-24%
7.41 ?(6.07 - 9.17, n=4)
-12%
Load Average *
7.58
10.63
-40%
13.35
-76%
13.63
-80%
9.55 ?(6.87 - 11.9, n=4)
-26%
Load Maximum *
11.83
11.57
2%
15.55
-31%
14.56
-23%
10.6 ?(6.88 - 12, n=4)
10%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.52 (5.06-11.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø11.2 (3.96-15.6)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.52 (3.33-15.8)
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.5 (5.39-5.67)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.96 (3.83-6.24)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.55 (2.5-3.4)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.9 (10.4-11.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.9 (6.62-15.2)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12 (11.4-12.9)
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.5 (5.39-5.67)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.96 (3.83-6.24)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.55 (2.5-3.4)

运行时间

MatePad Pro 12.2 拥有良好的电池续航能力,尤其是在使用多媒体时,可以持续很长时间。我们通过连续循环播放高清视频进行了模拟,华为平板电脑可以维持近 18 个小时。上网冲浪时,预计可持续 12.5 小时左右。Honor MagicPad 2 在所有基准测试中的平均续航时间几乎一样长,而小米 Pad 6S Pro 除了在 H.264 测试中的续航时间更长。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
22h 40min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 27min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 48min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 25min
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024
10100 mAh
Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh
OnePlus Pad 2
9510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
10090 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
10000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
16%
-33%
25%
Reader / Idle
1360
1469
8%
2565
89%
H.264
1068
880
-18%
773
-28%
WiFi v1.3
747
606
-19%
866
16%
502
-33%
959
28%
Load
205
232
13%
224
9%

Notebookcheck 总评分

华为 MatePad 12.2 纤薄、轻巧、做工精良,之所以能获得如此高的分数,首先要归功于它的雾面屏幕,其峰值亮度超过 2000 cd/m²。此外,它的功能也很强大,512 GB 的存储空间、100 瓦充电和基座键盘都包含在供货范围内。不过,谷歌应用程序只能绕道安装。

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 - 11/28/2024 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
71 / 80 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
56 / 69 → 81%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 89%
Battery
89%
Display
93%
Games Performance
21 / 65 → 32%
Application Performance
65 / 92 → 71%
AI Performance
23%
Temperature
92%
Noise
0%
Audio
90 / 91 → 98%
Camera
60 / 90 → 66%
Average
61%
82%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
88.7%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
33.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 43.7%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024) 评测--配备磨砂显示屏和强大功能的 12.2 英寸平板电脑
Manuel Masiero, 2024-12- 2 (Update: 2024-12- 2)