Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar宏碁 Nitro 14 (2024) 评测：紧凑型 RTX 4060 游戏笔记本，电池续航时间长
在最近评测了 宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo 14这款功能强大的 14.5 英寸游戏笔记本电脑之后，我们现在又拿到了 Nitro 14，这是宏碁推出的一款更加经济实惠的笔记本电脑，其设计基本相同。Predator 是一款高端笔记本电脑，而 Nitro 则面向中端市场。这一点从这款笔记本 1449 欧元（1600 美元）的价位和连贯的硬件配置上就能看出。 Ryzen 5 8645HS(鹰点）、一个 GeForce RTX 406016 GB 内存、512 GB 固态硬盘和 2.5K 显示屏。
Nitro 14 的竞争对手包括 HP Omen Transcend 14、联想 联想LOQ 15IRX9、 雷蛇刀锋 14，华硕 华硕 TUF GAMING A15 FA507UV和 XMG Core 15 (M24).
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.3 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX R5 8645HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 22.84 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
| 89.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 79 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 80.3 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 22.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.7 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 21.9 mm | 15.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 80.5 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 20.9 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 |
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
外壳 - 宏碁没有在 Nitro 上贴满 LED 灯
宏碁将塑料底座与铝制盖子搭配在一起。后者似乎很容易沾染指纹。尽管底座部分只能轻微扭动，但盖子却表现出更大的弹性。但这并不会导致任何图像失真，即使在盖子背面施加压力也不会。铰链能将显示屏牢牢固定在原位，调整后屏幕也不会晃动。单手即可打开笔记本电脑，角度可达 155 度左右。宏碁的机箱整体上还算不错。
如前所述，Nitro 的外观设计与 Helios Neo 14.后者薄了约 2 毫米（0.08 英寸），但其他方面的差异主要体现在外观上。Nitro 的机身大部分采用了宏碁称之为曜石黑的色调，只有机身后部的排气口采用了橙色。Nitro 没有像 Neo 14 那样提供任何纹理表面或印花。宏碁也没有在这两款笔记本上装饰 LED 灯带。
在我们比较的 14 英寸笔记本电脑中，Nitro 是最笨重的设备。就重量而言，它与竞争对手不相上下。惠普 HP Omen Transcend 14如果你对机身小巧和重量要求很高，那么惠普 Omen Transcend 14 绝对是你的不二之选。
规格 - USB4 配有 Power Delivery
宏碁选择了快速 USB 连接：右侧的 USB-C 端口和两个 USB-A 端口支持 USB 3.2 Gen 2，而另一个 USB-C 端口支持 USB4。两个 USB-C 接口均提供电源传输和 DisplayPort Alt 模式，使 Nitro 拥有三个视频输出接口（HDMI、2x DisplayPort）。由于所有端口都位于左右两侧的中心位置，因此与掌托相邻的区域基本没有线缆。另一个值得称赞的设计是，两侧各有一个 USB-A 和一个 USB-C 端口。
SD 读卡器
宏碁显然认为有必要配备一个 microSD 读卡器，但却选择了一个非常慢的型号，我们使用 AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 参考卡进行的测试就证明了这一点。将传输速率与 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14与华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 所达到的传输速率进行比较，就可以看出本来是可以做到的。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
连接性
该无线模块内置联发科 MT7922 Wi-Fi 6E 芯片，在最佳条件下（即周围没有 Wi-Fi 设备，笔记本电脑与接入点之间的距离较短）数据传输速率极佳，但仅限于接收数据时。发射速率仅为接收速率的一半左右。该模块还支持蓝牙 5.2。Nitro 没有内置千兆以太网端口。
网络摄像头
90 万像素的网络摄像头分辨率低、色彩准确度差，因此不要指望用它来创作任何艺术作品。摄像头也没有机械快门或开关。
配件
除了常见的文档（如快速入门指南和保修信息）外，这款笔记本电脑没有附带任何其他配件。
维护
要卸下底板，首先要拧下底部的所有螺丝。然后，在笔记本电脑的上侧，拆下显示屏后面的塑料条。除了扁铲或刮刀外，指甲也可能是这一步骤的有用工具。随后重新安装塑料条时要小心，因为有很多小的塑料夹子很容易断裂。最后，使用上述工具松开底板。另外需要注意的是，后排气口是底板的一部分。取下底板后，就可以看到 PCIe 4.0 M.2-2280 固态硬盘、Wi-Fi 模块以及天线、风扇和电池。由于内存是焊接的，因此没有内存插槽。
可持续性
宏碁为其许多产品提供碳足迹信息的碳足迹信息，但 Nitro 14 还不是其中之一。Nitro 14 的包装只使用了相对少量的塑料：一个装充电器的透明袋、一个装笔记本电脑的 PET 布袋和一个保护显示屏的 PP 填充物。包装的其余部分使用了硬纸板。根据印刷信息，包装盒和所有纸板元件均由可回收材料制成。由于底板可拆卸，因此可以进行维修和维护。软件更新在未来几年内也不成问题。
保修
宏碁在德国为这款 14.5 英寸笔记本电脑提供两年保修（邮寄）。延长保修期至三年的费用约为 100 欧元（110 美元）。不过，保修条款和条件可能因地区而异。
输入设备 - Acer 笔记本电脑提供 RGB 背光键盘
键盘
方向键和 WASD 键在 Chiclet 键盘上非常醒目，但它们的灯光不可单独定制。键盘仅支持三个照明区，而且缺少按键照明。一个积极的方面是方向键是全尺寸的。此外，所有按键的行程都很短，启动点也很清晰。按键阻力也令人满意。键盘略有晃动，但不会对键入体验造成太大影响。
触摸板
Nitro 14 采用多点触摸点击板，尺寸为 12 x 7 厘米（4.7 x 2.8 英寸），行程短，点击点明显。光滑的表面可让手指轻松滑动。必要时可禁用点击板。
显示屏 - 明亮的 IPS 面板，sRGB 覆盖范围
这块显示屏的对角线为 14.5 英寸，尺寸相当不常见，但由于采用了 16:10 的宽高比，其高度与 16:9 的 15.6 英寸屏幕相同。分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 的 120Hz IPS 面板拥有广视角、G-Sync 支持、无 PWM 闪烁和相当高的亮度。虽然阳光不宜太强，但该显示器在室外完全可读。宏碁还为 Nitro 14 提供了 WUXGA 显示屏选项（1920 x 1200 像素）。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 415 cd/m²
Contrast: 1221:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.8
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
74.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX AU Optronics B145QAN01.J, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5", 120 Hz | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 TL140ADXP04-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 240 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 BOE NJ NE156FHM-NX9, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AU Optronics B156HAN15.H, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1 (BOE0C8E), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3", 240 Hz | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) BOE CQ NE145F8M-NY1, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5", 165 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 16% | 0% | -2% | 1% | 23% | -8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 72.7 | 96.9 33% | 73.7 1% | 70.5 -3% | 73.2 1% | 99.6 37% | 65 -11% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.6 | 99.8 2% | 99.1 2% | 98.5 1% | 100 2% | 100 2% | 95.3 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 74.7 | 85 14% | 72.6 -3% | 72.7 -3% | 74.6 0% | 96.1 29% | 66.8 -11% |
| Response Times | 59% | -71% | -49% | 48% | 95% | 68% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 22.3 ? | 6 ? 73% | 42.2 ? -89% | 31.7 ? -42% | 9.6 ? 57% | 0.86 ? 96% | 5.4 ? 76% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 14.8 ? | 8.3 ? 44% | 22.6 ? -53% | 22.9 ? -55% | 9.2 ? 38% | 0.99 ? 93% | 5.9 ? 60% |
| PWM Frequency | 479 ? | ||||||
| Screen | 30% | 22% | 17% | 26% | 25% | 15% | |
| Brightness middle | 415 | 484.1 17% | 306 -26% | 315 -24% | 635 53% | 386.3 -7% | 450 8% |
| Brightness | 395 | 466 18% | 287 -27% | 303 -23% | 604 53% | 389 -2% | 433 10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 89 0% | 88 -1% | 90 1% | 91 2% | 98 10% | 87 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.38 -12% | 0.21 38% | 0.25 26% | 0.64 -88% | 0.45 -32% | |
| Contrast | 1221 | 1274 4% | 1457 19% | 1260 3% | 992 -19% | 1000 -18% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 2.23 50% | 2.25 50% | 2.26 50% | 1.89 58% | 4.03 10% | 2.26 50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.7 | 4.57 57% | 4.84 55% | 7.37 31% | 3.14 71% | 6.69 37% | 7.5 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.8 | 0.74 59% | 1.45 19% | 1.03 43% | 1.14 37% | 1.07 41% | 1.21 33% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.2 | 1.6 78% | 2.4 67% | 4 44% | 2.53 65% | 1.2 83% | 3.2 56% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.24 98% | 2.259 97% | 2.116 104% | 2.36 93% | 2.25 98% | 2.214 99% |
| CCT | 6541 99% | 6816 95% | 6790 96% | 7570 86% | 6434 101% | 6280 104% | 6121 106% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 35% /
31% | -16% /
4% | -11% /
4% | 25% /
24% | 48% /
36% | 25% /
18% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示屏的色彩还原能力尚可，但并不出色。屏幕的平均色差约为 4.5，达不到良好的标准（Delta E < 3）。校准后，Delta E 降至 1.8 的良好值。该面板几乎能再现整个 sRGB 色域，但不能再现 AdobeRGB 和 DCI-P3。这与大多数竞争对手的显示器相似。只有 欧曼创见 14和 刀锋 14提供完整的 DCI-P3 覆盖范围。
我们创建的色彩配置文件可以免费下载和使用。您可以在有关显示器的信息框中找到下载链接。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 22.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - AMD 与 Nvidia 的完美结合
宏碁 Nitro 是一款便携、小巧的中端游戏笔记本。鹰点 CPU（Ryzen 7 或 Ryzen 5）和 Ada Lovelace GPU（RTX 4050 或 RTX 4060 可选）提供了必要的动力。我们的评测机售价近 1450 欧元（1600 美元），配备了 Ryzen 5 8645HS和 GeForce RTX 4060.该系列的基本型号售价约为 1400 欧元（1550 美元）。
测试条件
笔记本电脑插电后有四种电源模式（见表）可供选择，其中只有两种（平衡模式和环保模式）可在电池供电时选择。我们在基准测试和电池测试中分别使用了 Turbo 和 Eco 模式。您可以按键盘上方的按钮或使用 NitroSense 软件（该软件是笔记本电脑的控制中心）在不同模式间切换。LED 指示灯会显示正在使用的模式。
注意："加速 "和 "性能 "模式只有在电池电量至少充满 40% 时才能使用。否则，只能使用平衡模式。
| 电源计划 | PL1 | PL2 | CB R23 Multi | TGP | Time Spy 图形 | CP 2077 QHD/Ultra | 压力测试 | 最大风扇噪音 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 安静 | 50 W | 100 W | 12,607 点 | 65 W | 8,782 点 | 38.2 FPS | CPU：58°C GPU：64°C |
40.79 dB(A) |
| 平衡 | 70 W | 100 W | 13,231 分 | 75 W | 9,419 分 | 38.8 FPS | CPU：60°C GPU：64°C |
45.61 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 80 W | 100 W | 13,242 分 | 90 W | 10,088 分 | 40.7 FPS | CPU：60°C GPU：70°C |
50.83 dB(A) |
| Turbo | 90 W | 100 W | 13,220 分 | 105 W | 10,799 分 | 45.6 FPS | CPU：76°C GPU：86°C |
56.98 dB(A) |
处理器
基于 Zen 4 的 Ryzen 5 8645HS提供 6 个 CPU 内核，共有 12 个线程，运行速度高达 5 GHz（单核）。在持续的多线程负载下（即 Cinebench R15 循环），该处理器能够始终以较高的涡轮时钟速度运行。插电后的三种模式结果大致相同，而静音模式则略微降低了处理器的性能。基准测试结果符合预期。处理器 Ryzen 5 7640HS进行比较。
竞争对手笔记本电脑的 CPU 拥有比 Ryzen 5 APU 更多的内核，因此多线程性能要好得多。不过，单线程性能方面的差异很小。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained load
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS () | |
| Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS () | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS () | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS () | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS () | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS () | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS () | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS () | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS () | |
| Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
系统性能
该系统运行流畅，可为游戏、渲染和流媒体传输提供充足的性能。我们在系统基准测试中取得的优异成绩也证实了这一点。不过，16 GB 内存的传输速率有时低于 LPDDR5X 内存的传输速率，这可能是 AMD 内存控制器造成的。内存是焊接的，无法升级。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=165, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=153, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (421 - 779, n=179, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7453 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS () | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS () | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS () | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS () | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
由于与驱动程序有关的问题，Nitro 14 在处理实时视频和音频时似乎遇到了困难。但未来的更新可能会改善这种情况。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
PCIe 4.0 M.2-2280 固态硬盘的存储容量仅为 512 GB，显得有些微不足道。对于一款售价约 1,450 欧元（1,600 美元）的游戏笔记本电脑，消费者应该有更高的期望。当我们循环运行 DiskSpd 时，观察到了热节流现象。没有额外的存储硬盘插槽。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
......（英文 GeForce RTX 4060RTX 4060 提供 3,072 个着色单元、128 位总线和 8 GB GDDR6，是 Nvidia 当前移动 GPU 阵容中的中低端显卡。宏碁指定的 TGP 为 110 瓦，低于 Nvidia 设定的 140 瓦最大 TGP。Nitro 14 的基准测试结果略高于 RTX 4060 的平均水平。四种电源模式之间的性能差异并不明显。在 dGPU 和 Optimus 模式之间切换无需重启；同时还支持高级 Optimus。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 50749 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 29555 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23835 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 10280 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2351 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
当以高至最高设置运行游戏时，笔记本电脑可以充分利用显示屏的全分辨率。内部硬件的帧率大多高于 RTX 4060 的平均帧率。不过，在 CPU 密集型游戏中，如《Dota 2 Reborn》、《GTA V》和《X-Plane 11》，结果低于 RTX 4060 的平均水平。帧生成和 DLSS3 允许游戏在最高设置和启用光线追踪的情况下以更高分辨率运行，但这只有在支持这些 GPU 功能的游戏中才能实现。像《黑色神话：悟空传》这样的 "硬件大户"会将 Nitro 14 推向极限，需要降低设置。
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (56.7 - 93.1, n=28) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 | |
| F1 24 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (54.1 - 127, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (47.5 - 60.9, n=8) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (36.7 - 84.7, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (31.8 - 38.8, n=5) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.2 - 129.5, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (48.6 - 61, n=3) | |
在 30 分钟的时间里，《赛博朋克 2077》：Phantom Liberty》在最大设置和全高清条件下保持了相当稳定的帧率，没有出现任何明显的性能下降。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 178.1 | 173.9 | 160.3 | 100.6 | 86.8 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 147.5 | 142.9 | 125.6 | 120.5 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 189.5 | 143.4 | 106 | 78.1 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 109.4 | 96.1 | 73.4 | |||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 133 | 115 | 111 | 103 | 96 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 326 | 272 | 222 | 193.2 | 129.4 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 144.6 | 116.8 | 103.3 | 100.4 | 62.8 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 124.8 | 101.3 | 86.6 | 75.8 | 45.6 | |
| F1 24 (2024) | 184.4 | 193.8 | 171.9 | 60.9 | 38.8 | |
| Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 62 | 48 | 27 | 30 | 19 |
排放 - 宏碁游戏笔记本电脑的温度适中
噪音排放
在 "涡轮增压 "模式下运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，笔记本电脑的噪音输出高达 57 分贝（A）。切换到其他电源模式后，风扇噪音降低到较为适中的水平。静音模式在所有选项中脱颖而出：它提供了更低的噪音水平，但帧数下降幅度不大。一般来说，笔记本电脑在未满载时相当安静。风扇在空闲时通常不会转动。
宏碁在优化风扇控制方面可能还有很大的空间。在压力测试和赛博朋克测试中，如果将温度与噪音水平联系起来看，风扇即使在较低转速下似乎也能提供足够的冷却。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.3 / 24.3 / 24.3 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 33.1 / 57 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.3 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R5 8645HS, Micron 3500 MTFDKBA512TGD | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13450HX, Micron 2400 MTFDKCD1T0QFM | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | -16% | -5% | 3% | 4% | -16% | |
| off / environment * | 24.3 | 24.3 -0% | 25 -3% | 25 -3% | 23 5% | 24.5 -1% | 24 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.3 | 25 -3% | 26 -7% | 25 -3% | 23 5% | 24.7 -2% | 29 -19% |
| Idle Average * | 24.3 | 25 -3% | 34 -40% | 27 -11% | 23 5% | 24.7 -2% | 31 -28% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.3 | 25 -3% | 36 -48% | 33 -36% | 23 5% | 24.7 -2% | 36 -48% |
| Load Average * | 33.1 | 33 -0% | 48 -45% | 40 -21% | 38.92 -18% | 25.2 24% | 47 -42% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 57.1 | 48 16% | 45 21% | 52.06 9% | 50 12% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 57 | 51.9 9% | 50 12% | 46 19% | 52.09 9% | 52 9% | 52 9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.5 | 50.96 | 47 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在负载情况下（即运行我们的压力测试或赛博朋克），笔记本电脑的平均表面温度最多为中等偏高，有些地方超过了 40°C（104°F）。不过，掌托始终保持相当凉爽。在日常使用中，表面温度不成问题。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.1 °C / 82.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.8 °C / 1.4 F).
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -5% | -13% | -9% | -23% | 14% | -15% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 43.5 | 41.8 4% | 47 -8% | 53 -22% | 52 -20% | 41.2 5% | 57 -31% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 46.3 | 42.2 9% | 58 -25% | 46 1% | 61 -32% | 39 16% | 55 -19% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.4 | 34.8 -14% | 32 -5% | 32 -5% | 35 -15% | 26.2 14% | 32 -5% |
| Idle Bottom * | 31.3 | 37.4 -19% | 36 -15% | 34 -9% | 39 -25% | 25.4 19% | 33 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在极限压力测试中，我们长时间运行 Prime95 和 FurMark，以评估系统在满负荷情况下的稳定性。在测试期间，CPU 时钟从 3.6 GHz 降至 2.8 GHz，而 GPU 时钟则从大约 2 GHz 升至 2.2 GHz。
| CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | 3.6 | 210 | 34 | 36 |
| Prime95 压力 | 4.6 | 210 | 87 | 49 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 3.3 | 2,100 | 76 | 86 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 4.2 | 2,700 | 73 | 82 |
发言人
立体声扬声器音效不错，但缺乏低音。使用外置扬声器或耳机可能会获得更好的音频体验。
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.12 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - Nitro 14 电池寿命超长
耗电量
Nitro 14 的能耗与内部硬件相比相当典型。在我们对比的设备中，它的空闲功耗最低，值得称赞。在压力测试和赛博朋克测试中，耗电量始终保持在一个稳定的水平。随机附带的 230 瓦充电器足以满足笔记本电脑的需求。
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle | 8 / 10.9 / 11.9 Watt |
| Load |
61.8 / 195.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX R5 8645HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Micron 3500 MTFDKBA512TGD, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKCD1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3" | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -100% | -42% | -9% | -22% | -26% | -18% | -47% | -73% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 8 | 20.9 -161% | 13 -63% | 7 12% | 9.3 -16% | 9.1 -14% | 6 25% | 11.8 ? -48% | 13.5 ? -69% |
| Idle Average * | 10.9 | 25.6 -135% | 18 -65% | 12 -10% | 12.9 -18% | 12.6 -16% | 11 -1% | 16.3 ? -50% | 18.9 ? -73% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.9 | 32.1 -170% | 24 -102% | 18 -51% | 12.8 -8% | 27.4 -130% | 21 -76% | 20.8 ? -75% | 26.7 ? -124% |
| Load Average * | 61.8 | 72.7 -18% | 85 -38% | 70 -13% | 63.5 -3% | 93 -50% | 94 ? -52% | 106.6 ? -72% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 151.3 | 155.7 -3% | 146.8 3% | 147.9 2% | |||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 147.9 | 150.9 -2% | 146.2 1% | 146.3 1% | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 195.1 | 228.4 -17% | 232 -19% | 206 -6% | 286 -47% | 135.3 31% | 252 -29% | 213 ? -9% | 249 ? -28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 182.1 | 167 | 118.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
电池寿命
在 Wi-Fi 测试（使用脚本访问网站）和视频测试（以全高清格式循环播放以 H.264 编码的短片《Big Buck Bunny》）中，Nitro 14 的续航时间分别为 10 小时 5 分钟和 13 小时 57 分钟。这些出色的成绩是大多数办公笔记本电脑无法企及的。不过，宏碁笔记本电脑还达不到华硕 A15 的水平。 华硕 A15和 XMG 酷睿 15 (M24)的水平，因为这两款设备的电池容量更大。
| Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX R5 8645HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 60 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh | HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0014 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 71 Wh | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -44% | -47% | 16% | 11% | -36% | -25% | -43% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1081 | 480 -56% | 622 -42% | 808 -25% | 565 ? -48% | |||
| H.264 | 837 | 608 -27% | 555 -34% | 408 ? -51% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 605 | 428 -29% | 320 -47% | 702 16% | 889 47% | 517 -15% | 519 -14% | 376 ? -38% |
| Load | 134 | 72 -46% | 151 13% | 66 -51% | 100 -25% | 85.3 ? -36% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 协调一致的中端游戏笔记本电脑
Nitro 14 设计紧凑，重量轻（约 2 千克或 4.4 磅），电池续航时间长达 10 至 14 小时，因此具有出色的便携性。电池可以使用 USB-C 适配器充电，因为两个 USB-C 端口（USB 3.2 Gen 2 和 USB4）都支持 Power Delivery，让您可以将专用充电器留在家里。
宏碁 Nitro 14 是一款外形小巧、性能稳定的中端游戏笔记本电脑。
它采用了 Ryzen 5 8645HS和 GeForce RTX 4060可提供 QHD 游戏、渲染和流媒体所需的动力，两款芯片均能以高时钟频率持续运行。虽然笔记本电脑的温度并不高，但会产生大量噪音。开启静音模式有助于降低噪音水平，而且只会造成少量性能损失。明亮的 16:10 14.5 英寸显示屏（2,560 x 1,600，IPS，120Hz，sRGB，支持 G-Sync）与笔记本电脑的设计非常契合。
接下来谈谈它的缺点：虽然该设备配备了快速的 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘，有助于缩短加载时间，但我们认为其存储容量（512 GB）还不够大；考虑到 1450 欧元（1600 美元）的价格，消费者应该可以期待 1 TB 的存储容量。此外，该机还可以使用存储卡，但宏碁（Acer）为其配备了一个迟缓的读卡器。焊接内存根本无法升级。
Nitro 14 的替代产品是 XMG Core 15 (M24).这款笔记本性能更强，内存可升级，有第二个固态硬盘插槽，电池续航时间更长。不过，它缺少一个 USB4 端口，发热量也比 Nitro 14 大得多。
价格和供应情况
在德国，宏碁 Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX 在Notebooksbilliger.de 的售价为 1,449 欧元（约合 1,600 美元）。.对于美国读者来说，亚马逊网站上有一款类似的机型（采用 Ryzen 7 处理器，但显示屏为 WUXGA），售价为 1,200 美元。
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
Acer Nitro 14 AN14-41-R3MX
- 08/24/2024 v8
Sascha Mölck
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
