Notebookcheck Logo

OneXPlayer 2 Pro 游戏手持设备、平板电脑或可拆卸设备评测:配备强大 Ryzen 7 的多面设备

变压器。

凭借其巧妙的配件,OneXPlay 无惧分类。强大的 AMD Ryzen 7 7840 不仅在游戏中表现出色,在许多其他任务中也同样出色。只是软件还未完全完善。
Handheld Console AMD Radeon Gaming Laptop / Notebook Convertible / 2-in-1 Ryzen (Zen) Zen 4

我们已经测试了 OneXPlayer 2.现在我们测试的是专业版,配备了更强大的 Ryzen 7 7840U.在我们的评测中,这款多功能掌上游戏机在游戏和外部环境方面都表现出了优势。得益于 32 GB 内存和 1 TB NVMe SSD,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 在游戏之外也能大显身手。可拆卸控制器和磁吸附键盘使该设备可作为迷你笔记本电脑或平板电脑使用。

在我们的评测中,我们发现 Ryzen 7840U使入门级 dGPU 变得过时。它有助于 OneXPlayer 作为游戏设备发挥出色的性能。无论是外出还是在家,它都能以 FHD 或 UHD 格式为我们 Steam 库中的许多最新游戏提供可玩的 FPS 水平。

OneXPlayer 必须与强大的竞争对手竞争。在手持设备中,很难避免像 联想Legion Go华硕 Rog Ally Z1 ExtremeAyaneo Kun.

ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 8 x 3.3 - 5.1 GHz, 30 W PL2 / Short Burst, 30 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-U (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
Memory
32 GB 
Display
8.40 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel, 10 point multitouch, native pen support, FLQ8423-24L0, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Headset Jack, Card Reader: microSD, Sensors: 6 axis gyro
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 43 x 311 x 135
Battery
65 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo Harman AudioEFX, Keyboard Light: no, magnetic Keyboard, Controller Connector
Weight
876 g, Power Supply: 262 g
Price
1017 USD
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
84.9 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
876 g43 mm8.40"2560x1600
85.2 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Ayaneo Kun
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
942 g22 mm8.40"2560x1600
84.9 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Lenovo Legion Go
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
845 g41 mm8.80"2560x1600
87.5 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
611 g21.22 mm7.00"1920x1080
84 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
One Netbook XPlayer 2
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M
864 g23 mm8.40"2560x1600
80.3 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
GPD Win 4
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M
607 g28 mm6.00"1920x1080

底盘和连接

OneXPlayer 2 Pro(带配件
OneXPlayer 2 Pro(带配件

从外观上看,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 没有任何变化。该设备有白色或黑色两种颜色可供选择,并带有橙色装饰。总的来说,这款游戏掌上电脑是一款坚固的设备,尽管它主要由塑料制成。我们发现 OneXPlayer 2的缺点在专业版中也同样存在。与控制器的连接处有一些不必要的晃动,不过它们也比专业版更容易移动。 联想Legion Go.如果取下 OneXPlayer 的控制器,它们就无法与平板电脑保持连接。要想不受限制地玩游戏,还需要另一个配件,即控制器连接器。

与许多其他手持设备一样,这里没有网络摄像头。该设备是捆绑产品的一部分,其中还包括键盘。键盘通过磁力吸附在平板电脑上,并通过 Pogo 针连接。不过,这也使 OneXPlayer Pro 底部的 USB C 3.2 端口失去了作用。总之,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 可用作平板电脑、游戏手持设备或可拆卸笔记本电脑。在两个拇指杆周围和手柄底部有橙色 LED 灯,可以为手柄增添一些色彩。

WiFi 解决方案在 5 和 6 GHz 网络中运行良好,microSD 读卡器的速度也很快。我们的 Angelbird AV PRO microSD 的传输速度高达 280 MB/s。在 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 中,传输速度可达 251 MB/s。在我们的数据库中,只有少数笔记本电脑能达到这一速度。

尺寸比较

下面列出了 OneXPlayer 2 的手持配置尺寸。不带控制器时,平板电脑的尺寸为 20 x 12.7 x 2 厘米。装上键盘后,OneXPlayer 2 的可拆卸脚踏板尺寸为 20 x 13.1 x 2.5 厘米。

311 mm 135 mm 43 mm 876 g325 mm 140 mm 22 mm 942 g299 mm 131 mm 41 mm 845 g310 mm 127 mm 23 mm 864 g280.44 mm 111.2 mm 21.22 mm 611 g220 mm 92 mm 28 mm 607 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
底部:用于连接键盘、USB C 3.2(带供电)和 DisplayPort 的插针
底部:用于连接键盘、USB C 3.2(带供电)和 DisplayPort 的插针
上侧:microSD 读卡器、USB A 3.0、USB4、3.5 毫米音频、三个功能键
上侧:microSD 读卡器、USB A 3.0、USB4、3.5 毫米音频、三个功能键
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (Angelbird AV PRO microSD)
184.04 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
146.02 MB/s -21%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
132.46 MB/s -28%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
132.4 MB/s -28%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
132 MB/s -28%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (20.9 - 184, n=9, last 2 years)
107.9 MB/s -41%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
63.3 MB/s -66%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
265.8 MB/s +6%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (Angelbird AV PRO microSD)
251.05 MB/s
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
247.7 MB/s -1%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
191.7 MB/s -24%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (84.6 - 260, n=8, last 2 years)
176.9 MB/s -30%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
144.57 MB/s -42%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
92.8 MB/s -63%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1648 (1587min - 1746max) MBit/s +6%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1584 (802min - 1625max) MBit/s +2%
Lenovo Legion Go
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1561 (1318min - 1673max) MBit/s +1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1553 (1302min - 1611max) MBit/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (590 - 1675, n=9, last 2 years)
1156 MBit/s -26%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (565 - 1687, n=26)
1110 MBit/s -29%
Ayaneo Kun
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
944 (876min - 962max) MBit/s -39%
GPD Win 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
669 (485min - 777max) MBit/s -57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1735 (1708min - 1755max) MBit/s +23%
Lenovo Legion Go
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1711 (862min - 1819max) MBit/s +22%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1597 (1517min - 1621max) MBit/s +14%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1405 (1179min - 1494max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (715 - 1715, n=26)
1222 MBit/s -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (715 - 1711, n=9, last 2 years)
1195 MBit/s -15%
GPD Win 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
990 (909min - 1056max) MBit/s -30%
Ayaneo Kun
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
981 (888min - 1075max) MBit/s -30%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion Go
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1615 (1509min - 1660max) MBit/s +5%
Ayaneo Kun
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1607 (1530min - 1641max) MBit/s +5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1532 (1497min - 1569max) MBit/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (975 - 1762, n=7, last 2 years)
1404 MBit/s -8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (712 - 1615, n=22)
1338 MBit/s -13%
GPD Win 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
712 (410min - 795max) MBit/s -54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion Go
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1789 (1485min - 1909max) MBit/s +28%
Ayaneo Kun
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1753 (874min - 1849max) MBit/s +25%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1383 - 1858, n=7, last 2 years)
1620 MBit/s +16%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (885 - 1827, n=23)
1478 MBit/s +6%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1397 (1288min - 1473max) MBit/s
GPD Win 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
951 (921min - 975max) MBit/s -32%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1532 (1497-1569)
Ayaneo Kun Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1607 (1530-1641)
Lenovo Legion Go Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1615 (1509-1660)
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø712 (410-795)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1396 (1288-1473)
Ayaneo Kun Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1723 (874-1849)
Lenovo Legion Go Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1789 (1485-1909)
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø951 (921-975)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1553 (1302-1611)
Ayaneo Kun Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (876-962)
Lenovo Legion Go Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1561 (1318-1673)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1648 (1587-1746)
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1558 (802-1625)
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø669 (485-777)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1405 (1179-1494)
Ayaneo Kun Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø981 (888-1075)
Lenovo Legion Go Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1682 (862-1819)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1735 (1708-1755)
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1517-1621)
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø990 (909-1056)

维护

打开 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 是可能的,但我们无法进一步拆卸背面。要做到这一点,我们必须卸下设备四面和背面的许多螺丝。控制器必须取下,因为控制器下面有一个螺丝盖,设备顶部和底部的两个可拆卸盖子下面也有一个螺丝盖。在内部,我们无法更进一步,因为用于固定主板上扩头的螺丝拧得非常紧、非常牢。至少我们可以看看大电池、风扇、键盘和控制器连接器的子板以及扬声器和 WiFi 天线。打开设备时,键盘附件的磁铁也会受到干扰。与散热片的磁铁相比,它们的安全性要差得多。

输入设备

有一些游戏掌上电脑配有内置键盘,但根据我们的经验,这些键盘并不适合快速触摸键入。GPD Win 4 的键盘 GPD Win 4的键盘比 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 的小得多,而且几乎没有键程。如果您想在聊天时输入几句话以上,那么这里的磁性键盘是游戏手持键盘上第一个可用的键盘。按键与普通笔记本键盘不太一样,但打字手感和 2 毫米的键程带来了良好的打字体验。与此形成鲜明对比的是,小巧而摇摆不定的触摸板令人失望。你可以使用它,但它不太符合人体工程学。点击时,指针经常跳来跳去,无法进行拖放操作。使用触摸屏是更好的选择。如果你愿意,OneNetbook 还会在 OneXPlayer 上捆绑一支数字转换笔,使设备的用途更加广泛。

对于游戏掌上电脑来说,比键盘和触摸板更重要的是:内置控制器。如前所述,两半控制器与平板电脑连接时并不完全稳固,会有一些晃动。在游戏时,我们并不觉得这很令人恼火。按键和触发器的触感与 Dualshock 4 控制器类似。拇指杆精确、易用,并能可靠地找到中立位置。我们希望肩键的阻力能稍大一些。要想不受限制地使用,需要使用控制器连接器配件。它带有一个小型 USB 2.4 GHz 连接器,必须将其插入 OneXPlayer 2 或其他设备才能连接控制器。在我们的测试中,它可以在 7 米以外完美地工作。所有输入都能转换,没有任何明显的延迟。

连接器上的控制器
连接器上的控制器
OneXplayer 2 Pro 的键盘
OneXplayer 2 Pro 的键盘

软件

预装玩家专区
预装玩家专区

OneXPlayer 2 Pro 出厂时安装的 Windows 11 几乎是清一色的。仅预装了 "玩家地带",这是一款用于调节设备性能的应用程序。在 OneXPlayer 2 的评测中的评测中,我们对该程序提出了批评。幸运的是,OneNetbook 重新修改了玩家专区。它看起来并不令人印象深刻,但现在能更好地运行全屏游戏。该游戏掌上电脑还有一个新的自定义游戏图形用户界面,但并不是很实用。游戏掌机没有针对触摸屏进行很好的优化。

另一个负面因素:平板电脑顶部的 X1 和 X2 键在用于调节扬声器音量时的分配。左键调高音量,右键调低音量,不够直观。

手持控制面板 是预装软件的一个精心设计的替代方案,可在 GitHub 上免费下载。该应用程序比 OneNetbook 的软件功能更多,设计更好。

显示屏

子像素矩阵 OneXPlayer
子像素矩阵 OneXPlayer
几乎没有背光渗漏
几乎没有背光渗漏

OneXPlayer 2 Pro 的屏幕亮度为 311 cd/m²,比上一代产品更暗,亮度也比竞争对手的产品低得多。 联想, Ayaneo华硕.这里使用的面板色域覆盖范围比以前有所提高,涵盖了 sRGB 色域。与所有测试过的手持设备一样,该设备使用的是水平内置的垂直平板面板。屏幕从左到右刷新,而不是从上到下刷新,这会对字体产生负面影响。

304
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
174
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
250
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
250
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
FLQ8423-24L0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 359 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 287.4 cd/m² Minimum: 134 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 48 %
Center on Battery: 318 cd/m²
Contrast: 2844:1 (Black: 0.1118 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.53
ΔE Greyscale 6.12 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
81.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.003
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
FLQ8423-24L0, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Ayaneo Kun
Ayaneo 2K, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Lenovo Legion Go
Legion Go Display, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
One Netbook XPlayer 2
FLQ8423, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
GPD Win 4
G1618-04, IPS, 1920x1080, 6"
Display
5%
3%
-18%
-11%
-20%
Display P3 Coverage
91.9
93.52
2%
92.1
0%
65.6
-29%
75.4
-18%
63.1
-31%
sRGB Coverage
99.3
99.4
0%
99.56
0%
92.1
-7%
97
-2%
92
-7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
81.6
91.2
12%
90.09
10%
67.9
-17%
71.1
-13%
64.6
-21%
Response Times
17%
28%
67%
-22%
2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
25.5 ?(11.5, 25)
24.2 ?(13.8, 10.4)
5%
20.8 ?(9.4, 11.4)
18%
10.5 ?(5, 5.5)
59%
36.8 ?(16.9, 19.9)
-44%
26.8 ?(12.5, 14.3)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
22.73 ?(11.05, 11.67)
16.2 ?(7.6, 8.6)
29%
14.4 ?(7, 7.4)
37%
6 ?(2.7, 3.3)
74%
22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4)
-0%
20.9 ?(11.4, 9.5)
8%
PWM Frequency
20000
700
Screen
-9%
-32%
-9%
-32%
-40%
Brightness middle
318
680
114%
411
29%
513
61%
369
16%
413.1
30%
Brightness
287
678
136%
413
44%
474
65%
363
26%
407
42%
Brightness Distribution
48
91
90%
80
67%
84
75%
89
85%
81
69%
Black Level *
0.1118
0.5
-347%
0.42
-276%
0.38
-240%
0.28
-150%
0.39
-249%
Contrast
2844
1360
-52%
979
-66%
1350
-53%
1318
-54%
1059
-63%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.81
4
17%
5.94
-23%
3.7
23%
7.1
-48%
6.97
-45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.93
9
-30%
10.56
-52%
8.3
-20%
10.9
-57%
14.11
-104%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.53
1
35%
2.95
-93%
2.6
-70%
1.24
19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.12
9
-47%
0.92
85%
5.1
17%
8.3
-36%
9.9
-62%
Gamma
2.003 110%
2 110%
1.93 114%
2.14 103%
2.01 109%
2.04 108%
CCT
7707 84%
7188 90%
8064 81%
7732 84%
8838 74%
9571 68%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / -3%
-0% / -16%
13% / 1%
-22% / -26%
-19% / -30%

* ... smaller is better

出厂时,OneXPlayer 的屏幕有明显的蓝色调。我们的 ICC 配置文件纠正了这一问题,大大提高了主观色彩准确度。deltaE 2000 1.53 校准后的色彩准确度几乎达到了专业水平。肉眼不应该看到任何色差。

灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜色检查器
颜色检查器
灰度校准
灰度校准
饱和度校准
饱和度校准
已校准的 ColoChecker
已校准的 ColoChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.73 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.05 ms rise
↘ 11.67 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
25.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.5 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

OneXPlayer 的视角稳定性很好,尽管还不如我们习惯的 IPS 面板。从某些角度观察,亮度和对比度会大幅降低。在正常使用时,这不是一个真正的问题。但在室外使用几乎是不可能的,因为光亮的屏幕在阴天时几乎无法消除反光。

性能

与最近的大多数游戏手柄一样,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 搭载了 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U.它配备了强劲的 Radeon 780MiGPU,可谓游戏利器。手持设备可配置 1 或 2 TB 的大容量存储。两种配置均配备 32 GB LPDDR5 内存。正如我们在 Ayaneo Kun一样,AMD APU 与大量内存的结合提供了足以处理大多数任务的性能。这款设备不仅限于游戏。

 

测试条件

玩家专区允许用户将 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 中 Ryzen 7 的 TDP 设置在 4 到 30 W 之间。与之前的 评测AMD Ryzen 7 6800U相比,本机处理器的功耗最多可增加 2 瓦。

处理器

......(英文 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U是一款拥有 8 个内核和 16 个线程的高端 APU。该处理器的 iGPU 是市场上最强大的 iGPU 之一,即 Radeon 780M在我们的测试中表现出色。

几乎相同的还有 AMDZ1 ExtremeROG Ally Z1 ExtremeLenovoLegion Go 都采用了这种 APU。在 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 中,Ryzen 7 的功耗为 30 W,其性能与Legion Go 中的 Z1 Extreme 相同。在某些基准测试中,OneXPlayer 的成绩与 Ryzen 7 相当甚至更好。不过,内存的运行速度相比之下要慢得多,从而降低了基准测试成绩。OneXPlayer 2 Pro 的强大处理器虽然不能完全发挥性能,但仍能取得不错的成绩。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2092 (2081.49-2100.51)
Ayaneo Kun AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2405 (2346.87-2439.02)
Lenovo Legion Go AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme: Ø1914 (1836.13-2049.71)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme; Turbo: Ø2271 (2104.49-2396.5)
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1452 (1430.41-1463.22)
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1487 (1450.64-1776.28)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
87.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Go -2!
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
82.4 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
77.2 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
 
76 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
74.4 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
72.1 pt
GPD Win 4 -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
65.1 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2 -3!
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
47.8 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15074 Points +14%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
14960 Points +13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
13224 Points
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
13004 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (11739 - 15074, n=10)
12884 Points -3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3984 - 15120, n=11, last 2 years)
12051 Points -9%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10546 (8992.1min - 10546max) Points -20%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
9130 Points -31%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1779 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1733 Points 0%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1731 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1088 - 1770, n=10, last 2 years)
1647 Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (1373 - 1742, n=10)
1646 Points -5%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1597 Points -8%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1534 Points -11%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
878 Points -49%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5917 Points +14%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5825 Points +13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5168 Points
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5109 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (4469 - 5917, n=10)
5039 Points -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1521 - 5917, n=9, last 2 years)
4627 Points -10%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
4107 Points -21%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
3529 Points -32%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
692 Points +2%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
676 Points
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
672 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (533 - 678, n=10)
644 Points -5%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
622 Points -8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (357 - 684, n=9, last 2 years)
605 Points -11%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
602 Points -11%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
341 Points -50%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2439 (2346.87min - 2439.02max) Points +16%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2397 (2104.49min - 2396.5max) Points +14%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2101 (2081.49min - 2100.51max) Points
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2050 (1836.13min - 2049.71max) Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (1025 - 2439, n=12)
1946 Points -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (689 - 2439, n=9, last 2 years)
1881 Points -10%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1776 (1450.64min - 1776.28max) Points -15%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1463 (1430.41min - 1463.22max) Points -30%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
280 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
268 Points +2%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
264 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (217 - 272, n=10)
256 Points -3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (176.6 - 268, n=8, last 2 years)
251 Points -5%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
246 Points -7%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
246 Points -7%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
142.6 Points -46%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
347 Seconds * -44%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
304 Seconds * -26%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (208 - 315, n=7, last 2 years)
253 Seconds * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (208 - 270, n=10)
251 Seconds * -4%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
241 Seconds *
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
213 Seconds * +12%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
208 Seconds * +14%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
62657 MIPS +11%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
62156 MIPS +10%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
56966 MIPS +1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
56268 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (50087 - 62156, n=10)
55687 MIPS -1%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (19684 - 64454, n=9, last 2 years)
51570 MIPS -8%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
49708 MIPS -12%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
40058 MIPS -29%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
6316 MIPS +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (4657 - 6408, n=10)
5816 MIPS +2%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5682 MIPS
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5490 MIPS -3%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
5472 MIPS -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3653 - 6077, n=8, last 2 years)
5279 MIPS -7%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
3398 MIPS -40%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
11727 Points +58%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10990 Points +48%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10872 Points +46%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (7310 - 11489, n=10)
9791 Points +32%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (4587 - 12026, n=10, last 2 years)
9077 Points +22%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7778 Points +5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7427 Points
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2538 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2530 Points +13%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2530 Points +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (1982 - 2562, n=10)
2367 Points +6%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2243 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1348 - 2550, n=10, last 2 years)
2230 Points -1%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2194 Points -2%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10917 Points +41%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
9803 Points +27%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
9589 Points +24%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (7399 - 10558, n=10)
9113 Points +18%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (4457 - 10713, n=10, last 2 years)
8563 Points +11%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
8389 Points +8%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7743 Points
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
7737 Points 0%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
6854 Points -11%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1956 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1898 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1896 Points +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (1355 - 1933, n=10)
1705 Points +5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1278 - 1917, n=10, last 2 years)
1676 Points +3%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1622 Points
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1549 Points -5%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1355 Points -16%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
926 Points -43%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
18.6 fps +18%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
18.4 fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
16.3 fps +3%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
15.8 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (12.5 - 18.7, n=8, last 2 years)
15.8 fps 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (14.4 - 18.6, n=10)
15.7 fps -1%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
12.9 fps -18%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
11.8 fps -25%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
84.9 s * -47%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
57.8 s *
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
53.5 s * +7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (46.2 - 63.8, n=8, last 2 years)
52.8 s * +9%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
52.3 s * +10%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
50.9 s * +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (43.4 - 67.1, n=10)
50.1 s * +13%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
43 s * +26%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
0.52 sec * -8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.4601 - 0.678, n=9, last 2 years)
0.4975 sec * -4%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4945 sec * -3%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4912 sec * -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (0.4559 - 0.581, n=11)
0.4821 sec * -1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4795 sec *
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4662 sec * +3%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4447 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2101 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
123 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
264 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5168 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
676 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
13224 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1731 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
97.1 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
89.1 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
84.4 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
 
81.5 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
80.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
75.8 pt
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
61.7 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
54 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
25901 KRay/s +19%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
25652 KRay/s +18%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
24067 KRay/s +10%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
21814 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (17924 - 25901, n=10)
21031 KRay/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
20714 KRay/s -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (10795 - 25901, n=9, last 2 years)
20307 KRay/s -7%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
11279 KRay/s -48%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
10902 KRay/s -50%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
109745 Points +20%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
108496 Points +18%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
102584 Points +12%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
91595 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (78360 - 109745, n=10)
89071 Points -3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (58068 - 109745, n=9, last 2 years)
87115 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
86738 Points -5%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
72386 Points -21%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
67503 Points -26%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4847 MB/s +15%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4777 MB/s +13%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
4420 MB/s +5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
4211 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (3519 - 4847, n=10)
4069 MB/s -3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2707 - 4847, n=9, last 2 years)
3918 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
3854 MB/s -8%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
2485 MB/s -41%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
2296 MB/s -45%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
114294 Points +15%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
113343 Points +14%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
106595 Points +7%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
99496 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (83206 - 114294, n=10)
99477 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
95153 Points -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (69419 - 114294, n=9, last 2 years)
94473 Points -5%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
86451 Points -13%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
62082 Points -38%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
14822 Points +9%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
14596 Points +7%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
14070 Points +3%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13607 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (11969 - 14822, n=10)
13054 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
12936 Points -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (8463 - 14822, n=9, last 2 years)
12441 Points -9%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
11141 Points -18%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
7753 Points -43%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
58482 Points +21%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
57426 Points +19%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
54962 Points +13%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
48428 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (40720 - 58482, n=10)
47352 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
46180 Points -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (28245 - 58482, n=9, last 2 years)
46040 Points -5%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
39913 Points -18%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
37417 Points -23%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
166333 MB/s +12%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
165008 MB/s +11%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
149047 MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (57678 - 166333, n=9, last 2 years)
108538 MB/s -27%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (53018 - 166333, n=10)
105137 MB/s -29%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
102968 MB/s -31%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
87114 MB/s -42%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
76146 MB/s -49%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
57678 MB/s -61%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
1047 MB/s +16%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
958 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
964 MB/s +7%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
899 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (801 - 1047, n=10)
876 MB/s -3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (654 - 1047, n=9, last 2 years)
846 MB/s -6%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
687 MB/s -24%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
631 MB/s -30%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
554 MB/s -38%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13846 KRay/s +22%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
13765 KRay/s +21%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
12875 KRay/s +14%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
11335 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (9347 - 13846, n=10)
11110 KRay/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
10740 KRay/s -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (5732 - 13846, n=9, last 2 years)
10694 KRay/s -6%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
5926 KRay/s -48%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
5925 KRay/s -48%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
37540 MPixel/s +41%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (26622 - 49287, n=9, last 2 years)
35035 MPixel/s +32%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
34764 MPixel/s +31%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (26622 - 38173, n=10)
32058 MPixel/s +20%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
30576 MPixel/s +15%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
29573 MPixel/s +11%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
27090 MPixel/s +2%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
26622 MPixel/s
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
26427 MPixel/s -1%

系统性能

在系统性能基准测试中,缓慢的 RAM 显现出来。不久前,我们在评测 Ayaneo Kun.尽管这款游戏掌上电脑使用了同样强劲的 Ryzen 7 7840U,但内存速度相对较慢也降低了其性能。

OneXPlayer 2 Pro 在日常使用中表现出色。它非常适合办公、流媒体、浏览等多种用途。游戏掌上电脑的核心任务是玩游戏,用户在这方面无需做出任何牺牲。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
6907 Points +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (5866 - 7157, n=10)
6465 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
6439 Points +9%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
6394 Points +8%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6330 Points +7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (5866 - 7149, n=9, last 2 years)
6319 Points +7%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
5900 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
5057 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
10296 Points +11%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
10205 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
10081 Points +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (9068 - 11081, n=10)
9985 Points +8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (9068 - 10633, n=9, last 2 years)
9730 Points +5%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
9483 Points +3%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
9247 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
8480 Points -8%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
10074 Points +38%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
9235 Points +26%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (7323 - 10099, n=10)
9002 Points +23%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
8996 Points +23%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7323 - 9912, n=9, last 2 years)
8467 Points +16%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8089 Points +10%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
7323 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
6089 Points -17%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8975 Points +9%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
8621 Points +5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7204 - 9408, n=9, last 2 years)
8349 Points +1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
8233 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (7204 - 8987, n=10)
8185 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
7990 Points -3%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
7529 Points -9%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
6799 Points -17%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1718 Points +28%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1575 Points +18%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1256 - 1804, n=10)
1498 Points +12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (840 - 1693, n=7, last 2 years)
1390 Points +4%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1366 Points +2%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1340 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
1009 Points -25%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1662 Points +17%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1596 Points +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1261 - 1798, n=10)
1492 Points +5%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1429 Points +1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1416 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (874 - 1649, n=7, last 2 years)
1407 Points -1%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
971 Points -31%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1878 Points +47%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1596 Points +25%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1251 - 1835, n=10)
1571 Points +23%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (808 - 1868, n=7, last 2 years)
1421 Points +11%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1278 Points
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1272 Points 0%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
1054 Points -18%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1479 Points +13%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1457 Points +11%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1451 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (1082 - 1775, n=10)
1334 Points +2%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
1309 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (831 - 1538, n=7, last 2 years)
1270 Points -3%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
994 Points -24%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
432 Points +88%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
300 Points +30%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
293 Points +27%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (188.4 - 322, n=11)
262 Points +14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (188.4 - 306, n=9, last 2 years)
254 Points +10%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
230 Points
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
228 Points -1%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
188.4 Points -18%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
181.3 Points -21%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
1016 ms * -96%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
746 ms * -44%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
565 ms * -9%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
594 ms * -15%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (516 - 779, n=9, last 2 years)
587 ms * -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (509 - 746, n=11)
567 ms * -9%
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
556 ms * -7%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
518 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
5900 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
92447 MB/s +111%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
76512 MB/s +75%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (43255 - 70532, n=11)
58370 MB/s +33%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (32617 - 81717, n=10, last 2 years)
58091 MB/s +33%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
51518 MB/s +18%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
49923 MB/s +14%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
45357 MB/s +4%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
45279 MB/s +3%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
43750 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
55710 MB/s +48%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
50337 MB/s +34%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (37399 - 61602, n=10)
49647 MB/s +32%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25380 - 80481, n=9, last 2 years)
49175 MB/s +31%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
48348 MB/s +28%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
44068 MB/s +17%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
43864 MB/s +16%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
37657 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
108872 MB/s +119%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
92869 MB/s +86%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (49426 - 92289, n=12)
71395 MB/s +43%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25596 - 108872, n=11, last 2 years)
67453 MB/s +35%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
51117 MB/s +3%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
51094 MB/s +3%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
50079 MB/s +1%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49922 MB/s 0%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49426 MB/s -1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49797 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
134.4 ns * -2%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
132.2 ns * -0%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
132.3 ns *
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (112.6 - 139.6, n=10, last 2 years)
127.8 ns * +3%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
123.1 ns * +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (90 - 137.2, n=11)
121.3 ns * +8%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
119.5 ns * +10%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
113.7 ns * +14%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
110.3 ns * +17%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

DPC 延迟有问题?OneXPlayer 2 Pro 不会。在冲浪、流媒体和 Prime95 压力测试等标准化测试中,它都没有出现问题。不过,在播放一分钟的 4K60Hz Youtube 视频时,还是出现了 290 帧的掉帧现象。

 
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
995 μs *

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

在比较中,OneXPlayer 的固态硬盘速度最快。高性能也不会受到持续负载的影响。遗憾的是,我们无法确定这里使用的是哪块固态硬盘。在设备管理器中,固态硬盘只是注册为带有 Phison 控制器的 NVMe 固态硬盘。由于无法进一步打开 OneXPlayer 2 Pro,我们也无法查看标签。

DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read: 7005MB/s
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write: 6151MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read: 4421MB/s
DiskSpd seq_write: 5102MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read: 4025MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write: 2452MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read: 64.2MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write: 181.4MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read: 6989MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
94.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
80.2 pt
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
59.6 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
55.3 pt
Global Average -3
 
54.5 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
53.7 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
40.5 pt
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
32.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
4421 (4398.57min - 4420.59max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
4132 (2139.64min - 4132.14max) MB/s -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (431 - 5565, n=10, last 2 years)
2840 MB/s -36%
Global Average -3
  (38.2 - 7045, n=1731)
2351 MB/s -47%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2119 (2112.04min - 2119.17max) MB/s -52%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
2106 (2093.38min - 2106.19max) MB/s -52%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
2024 (2003.2min - 2023.75max) MB/s -54%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
463 (318.56min - 463.17max) MB/s -90%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
431 (334.87min - 430.55max) MB/s -90%
seq write
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
5102 (4976.45min - 5101.6max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3804 (1734.97min - 3803.55max) MB/s -25%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2757 (2694.69min - 2756.71max) MB/s -46%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
2713 (2668.42min - 2712.9max) MB/s -47%
Global Average -3
  (38.2 - 9307, n=1731)
2393 MB/s -53%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (259 - 5102, n=10, last 2 years)
2298 MB/s -55%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1644 (1600.76min - 1644.1max) MB/s -68%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
263 (255.13min - 262.56max) MB/s -95%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (118.2min - 258.69max) MB/s -95%
seq q8 t1 read
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
7005 (6255.88min - 7004.74max) MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6987 (616.14min - 6987.16max) MB/s 0%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6320 (613min - 6319.71max) MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
5068 (4682.73min - 5068.47max) MB/s -28%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2458 - 7005, n=10, last 2 years)
4718 MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
4274 (3828.24min - 4274.42max) MB/s -39%
Global Average -3
  (38.5 - 16089, n=1731)
3966 MB/s -43%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
3410 (3100.94min - 3410.49max) MB/s -51%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
3212 (2755.45min - 3212.49max) MB/s -54%
seq q8 t1 write
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
6151 (6074.61min - 6150.81max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
3894 (3354.39min - 3893.57max) MB/s -37%
Global Average -3
  (38.2 - 14571, n=1731)
2992 MB/s -51%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2842 (2705.33min - 2842.27max) MB/s -54%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
2830 (2802.69min - 2829.69max) MB/s -54%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (256 - 6151, n=10, last 2 years)
2537 MB/s -59%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1790 (1750.28min - 1789.5max) MB/s -71%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (256.06min - 258.58max) MB/s -96%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
256 (243.34min - 256.39max) MB/s -96%
4k q1 t1 read
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
77.5 (77.45min - 77.51max) MB/s +21%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
72.2 (70.46min - 72.23max) MB/s +12%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
68 (67.5min - 67.95max) MB/s +6%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
64.2 (61.66min - 64.21max) MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (37.3 - 97.4, n=10, last 2 years)
59.4 MB/s -7%
Global Average -3
  (0.67 - 361, n=1731)
58.3 MB/s -9%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
39.1 (33.75min - 39.14max) MB/s -39%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
37.3 (36.41min - 37.3max) MB/s -42%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
33.4 (33.02min - 33.38max) MB/s -48%
4k q1 t1 write
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
213 (211.2min - 212.65max) MB/s +17%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
210 (193.2min - 209.71max) MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
202 (192.69min - 202.49max) MB/s +11%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
192.3 (177.32min - 192.31max) MB/s +6%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
164.6 (149.63min - 164.58max) MB/s -9%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
181.4 (169.88min - 181.36max) MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (112.3 - 226, n=11, last 2 years)
172 MB/s -5%
Global Average -3
  (1.23 - 435, n=1730)
166.1 MB/s -8%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
153.8 (152.6min - 153.77max) MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
151.3 (148.2min - 151.25max) MB/s -17%
4k q32 t16 read
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
4025 (4006.61min - 4024.99max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
1943 (1054.45min - 1942.86max) MB/s -52%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1647 (1638.92min - 1646.84max) MB/s -59%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
1632 (1627.81min - 1632.27max) MB/s -59%
Global Average -3
  (1.03 - 6172, n=1730)
1415 MB/s -65%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (86 - 4025, n=10, last 2 years)
1299 MB/s -68%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
984 (894.6min - 983.67max) MB/s -76%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
150.3 (144.83min - 150.29max) MB/s -96%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
86 (58.25min - 86max) MB/s -98%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Go
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
2871 (1656.3min - 2870.9max) MB/s +17%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
 
2452 (2245.51min - 2452.41max) MB/s
Global Average -3
  (1.5 - 5171, n=1730)
1213 MB/s -51%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1113 (1107.59min - 1113.49max) MB/s -55%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
1090 (1080.49min - 1090.38max) MB/s -56%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (89.1 - 2871, n=10, last 2 years)
1003 MB/s -59%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
434 (400.52min - 433.94max) MB/s -82%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
262 MB/s -89%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (220.73min - 258.5max) MB/s -89%

Sustained performance read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18  ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6989 (6462.66-7005.33)
Ayaneo Kun Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB: Ø903 (607.96-6879.08)
Ayaneo Kun Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø866 (612.58-6995.47)
Lenovo Legion Go WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2347 (909.53-4965.43)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM: Ø4046 (2891.85-4197.44)
One Netbook XPlayer 2  : Ø3170 (2962.02-3188.81)
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB: Ø3406 (3167.54-3417.39)

图形卡

在 iGPU 中,只有 英特尔 Arc iGPU可以与 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 中的 Radeon 780M 相媲美。这两款 iGPU 的性能都超过了 Nvidia 的入门级 GPU。这两款 iGPU GTX 1650RTX 2050都比现代 iGPU 慢,具体取决于 TDP。现在不一定需要昂贵的专用 GPU 了。这既降低了设备的价格,也降低了功耗。

OneXPlayer 2 Pro 的性能不如最近评测的 Ayaneo Kun相比,它可以与 联想Legion Go.iGPU 的性能在预期范围内,因为Legion Go 还为其 Z1 Extreme这两款 AMD 芯片使用相同的 GPU。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-1240P
97 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
94.9 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
94.4 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme -1!
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
91.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
89.9 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
89.7 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
88.6 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M
 
88.4 pt
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
87.8 pt
GPD Win 4 -1!
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
75.8 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2 -1!
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
75.5 pt
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1260P
73.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
13073 Points +9%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12866 Points +7%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12795 Points +6%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (7868 - 14249, n=56)
12460 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12162 Points +1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
12043 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (10150 - 13828, n=8, last 2 years)
11923 Points -1%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-1240P
11830 Points -2%
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
10915 Points -9%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1260P
10598 Points -12%
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10261 Points -15%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
9202 Points -24%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-1240P
53782 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
50811 Points +7%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
49862 Points +5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
47301 Points
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1260P
47225 Points 0%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (27771 - 53972, n=29)
46628 Points -1%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (38676 - 50811, n=6, last 2 years)
46039 Points -3%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
43941 Points -7%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8971 Points +13%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-1240P
8755 Points +10%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
8373 Points +5%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1260P
8249 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
7974 Points 0%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7971 Points
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
7963 Points 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6683 - 8775, n=11, last 2 years)
7891 Points -1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
7865 Points -1%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (4550 - 8816, n=58)
7747 Points -3%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
7193 Points -10%
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
6865 Points -14%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-1240P
3184 Points +11%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3172 Points +11%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2913 Points +2%
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R7F3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
2900 Points +1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2866 Points
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2854 Points 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2444 - 3491, n=11, last 2 years)
2853 Points 0%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (1496 - 3196, n=58)
2713 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2646 Points -8%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
2419 Points -16%
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
2303 Points -20%
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1260P
1072 Points -63%
3DMark 11 Performance
11820 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
187361 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34281 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7401 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3183 points
Help

游戏

评测游戏的帧速率达到了预期的良好水平。与其他测试过的掌上电脑一样,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 在游戏方面表现出色。全高清设置和高图形保真度的处理都没有问题。如果要使用全屏分辨率,可能只有 AMD FSR 才能胜任。

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
93.8 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
92.2 pt
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
91.8 pt
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
89.7 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
86.6 pt
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
85.5 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
84.3 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
33.9 fps +15%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
29.5 (28min, 28P1) fps
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29.4 (27min, 28P1) fps 0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.5 (24min, 26P1) fps -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (17.5 - 33.9, n=11, last 2 years)
27.1 fps -8%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23.1 (18min, 22P1) fps -22%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
22.8 (21min) fps -23%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.7 (3.65min, 16.9P1) fps +6%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.5 (1.496min, 15.9P1) fps +5%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.7 (3min, 16.9P1) fps +2%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.3 (3.57min, 16.1P1) fps
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.1 (7.24min, 13.5P1) fps -1%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.8 (3min, 15.4P1) fps -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.6 - 27.1, n=11, last 2 years)
24.6 fps -3%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.5 (2.34min, 16.7P1) fps -3%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
28.6 fps +1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
28.3 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.7 fps -2%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.3 fps -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.4 - 30, n=12, last 2 years)
25.7 fps -9%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23.9 fps -16%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23.9 fps -16%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
49.1 (35.6min, 38.9P1) fps +1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
48.6 (29.1min, 38.3P1) fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
46.3 (8.7min, 11.5P1) fps -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30 - 51.6, n=12, last 2 years)
44.1 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
42.6 (7.5min, 9.94P1) fps -12%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
41.5 (29min, 31.8P1) fps -15%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
40.9 (31.9min, 32.9P1) fps -16%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
78.7 (68.6min) fps +30%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
75.5 (67.6min) fps +25%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
67.2 (58.9min) fps +11%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
63.1 (54.8min) fps +4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30.8 - 78.7, n=12, last 2 years)
61.7 fps +2%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
60.4 (54.6min) fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
59.7 (52.4min) fps -1%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
58.6 (51.9min) fps -3%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33.8 fps +22%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
33.5 fps +21%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
33.5 fps +21%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24.5 - 38.9, n=12, last 2 years)
30.3 fps +10%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29.9 fps +8%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.6 fps
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.7 fps -3%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.5 fps -11%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29 fps +31%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.3 (18.4min) fps +24%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.8 (18.7min) fps +12%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (13.8 - 29.6, n=37)
24.6 fps +11%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
23.84 (18.65min) fps +8%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
23.8 fps +8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.8 - 29, n=13, last 2 years)
23.2 fps +5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
22.1 (9.85min) fps
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
52.1 (9.9min) fps +24%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43.9 (24.5min) fps +5%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43.4 (30.1min) fps +4%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
41.9 (33.5min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (32.5 - 52.1, n=40)
40.3 fps -4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
39.1 fps -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25 - 52.1, n=16, last 2 years)
38.1 fps -9%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
36.14 fps -14%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
42 fps +2%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
41 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
38 fps -7%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (23.4 - 42, n=17)
36.2 fps -12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24 - 42, n=9, last 2 years)
35.3 fps -14%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
32 fps -22%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
43 fps +2%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43 fps +2%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
42 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (26.5 - 48, n=19)
40.7 fps -3%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
40 fps -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (27 - 48, n=11, last 2 years)
39.6 fps -6%
Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:High T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
37.6 fps +4%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
36 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (26.2 - 37.6, n=3, last 2 years)
33.3 fps -7%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (21.9 - 37.6, n=5)
29.3 fps -19%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.2 fps -27%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
24.8 fps -31%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:High T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
28 fps +6%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.3 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (19.4 - 28, n=3, last 2 years)
24.6 fps -6%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (17.7 - 28, n=5)
22.2 fps -16%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
19.5 fps -26%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
19.4 fps -26%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
22.4 fps +6%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
21.1 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (14.9 - 22.4, n=3, last 2 years)
19.5 fps -8%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (13.7 - 22.4, n=5)
17.4 fps -18%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
14.9 fps -29%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
14.8 fps -30%
Horizon Zero Dawn
1920x1080 Favor Quality
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
44 (22min) fps +5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
42 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (36 - 44, n=4)
39.8 fps -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (33 - 44, n=4, last 2 years)
38.8 fps -8%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
37 (12min) fps -12%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
36 (4min) fps -14%
1920x1080 Ultimate Quality
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
38 (21min) fps +3%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
37 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (31 - 38, n=3)
35.3 fps -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (31 - 38, n=3, last 2 years)
35.3 fps -5%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
31 (12min) fps -16%
2560x1440 Ultimate Quality
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24 (15min) fps +4%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
23 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (22 - 24, n=3)
23 fps 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (22 - 24, n=3, last 2 years)
23 fps 0%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
22 (12min) fps -4%
Ghostwire Tokyo
1920x1080 High Settings
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45.5 fps +19%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (38.2 - 45.5, n=2, last 2 years)
41.9 fps +10%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (31.3 - 45.5, n=3)
38.3 fps 0%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
38.2 fps
1920x1080 Highest Settings
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45 fps +9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (41.2 - 45, n=2, last 2 years)
43.1 fps +5%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
41.2 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (30.4 - 45, n=3)
38.9 fps -6%
2560x1440 Highest Settings
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.3 fps +18%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (22.2 - 26.3, n=2)
24.3 fps +9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (22.2 - 26.3, n=2, last 2 years)
24.3 fps +9%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
22.2 fps
F1 23
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
61.1 (53min, 51P1) fps +8%
Lenovo Legion Go
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
57.2 (46min, 35P1) fps +1%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
56.5 (29min, 45P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (27.3 - 61.1, n=31)
49.4 fps -13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (27.3 - 61.1, n=9, last 2 years)
49.1 fps -13%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43.7 (11min, 32P1) fps -23%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
14.6 (9min, 9P1) fps +12%
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
13 (8min, 8P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (6.25 - 14.7, n=22)
11.8 fps -9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6.25 - 14.6, n=7, last 2 years)
11.1 fps -15%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
8.87 (1min, 5P1) fps -32%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

051015202530Tooltip
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M: Ø29.5 (28-31)
Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M: Ø29.4 (27-32)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M: Ø27.5 (24-30)
One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M: Ø23.1 (18-25)
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 150.7 130.6 61.7 25.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 29.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 114.4 95 65.4 60.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 37.8 28.3 20.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 48.9 31 27.6
Far Cry 5 (2018) 65 48 44 42
Strange Brigade (2018) 159.7 65.2 55.8 48.6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 42 41 35
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 48 42 37 23
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) 43.2 38.2 41.2 22.2
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 36 26.3 21.1 14.9
F1 23 (2023) 90.8 80.6 56.5 13
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) 25 20.6 20.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 41.9 31.8 22.1

排放与能源

噪音

由于 联想Legion Go和 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 配置了相同的 TDP,因此直接比较这两款设备是公平的。这两款游戏手持设备不仅在概念上相似,在噪音方面也很接近。Legion Go 在满载情况下噪音稍小。在日常使用中,2 到 3 dB(a) 的差异可能并不明显。

Noise Level

Idle
24.4 / 24.4 / 30.6 dB(A)
Load
36 / 39.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.937.538.241.441.140.92530.231.43230.530.230.23128.929.629.830.526.228.94030.932.532.93133.430.95029.631.230.92924.729.66323.325.724.223.824.623.38020.220.819.518.318.520.210018.618.418.316.713.518.612519.318.61815.21419.316019.619.719.215.313.819.62002220.619.916.413.52225021.320.218.915.511.821.331523.321.320.516.311.723.340024.323.821.71811.824.350025.925.623.318.911.425.963028.327.925.321.311.628.380028.728.826.120.911.328.7100026.326.224.318.611.226.3125026.225.222.517.711.626.2160028.327.424.519.711.728.3200028.628.52519.111.928.6250026.726.723.418.211.926.7315027.827.824.119.812.427.8400028.328.425.118.712.728.3500028.728.724.51813.128.7630026.927.123.417.313.126.9800026.927.223.116.413.426.91000022.222.417.813.913.122.21250020.520.11613.312.720.51600017.317.414.512.41217.3SPL39.339.23630.624.439.3N32.92.21.20.53median 26.2median 25.6median 23.1median 17.7median 12median 26.2Delta3.83.83.11.70.73.823.627.526.225.123.626.628.924.526.326.629.432.928.13529.440.238.728.626.840.241.440.827.424.741.431.836.628.228.131.827.3292420.327.333.436.621.921.333.421.424.117.614.221.421.42117.215.321.420.81815.512.620.821.916.31610.821.922.417.116.811.622.422.216.21510.522.224.416.516.210.124.425.416.515.810.125.426.115.715.711.126.127.115.21411.127.128.113.813.210.728.127.412.312.210.527.426.211.711.610.526.224.711.211.410.924.722.712.11211.122.723.515.314.312.123.523.914.112.911.723.926.612.512.611.726.625.512.312.111.725.522.61211.911.922.616.312.212.111.816.313.3121211.413.337.526.925.523.337.52.50.80.60.42.5median 23.9median 15.2median 14median 11.4median 23.92.43.721.12.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18Lenovo Legion Go
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
Lenovo Legion Go
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
Noise
-9%
7%
3%
-9%
-19%
off / environment *
24.4
23
6%
23.3
5%
26.1
-7%
24
2%
Idle Minimum *
24.4
25.31
-4%
23
6%
23.3
5%
26.1
-7%
31.2
-28%
Idle Average *
24.4
25.31
-4%
23
6%
23.3
5%
31.6
-30%
31.2
-28%
Idle Maximum *
30.6
34.5
-13%
25
18%
27.3
11%
31.6
-3%
33.5
-9%
Load Average *
36
34.9
3%
37
-3%
39.2
-9%
35.7
1%
45.5
-26%
Load Maximum *
39.3
50.78
-29%
37
6%
39.2
-0%
43.3
-10%
49
-25%
Witcher 3 ultra *
46
39.2
43.3
48.6

* ... smaller is better

热量

与联想Legion Go 一样,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 也展示了可拆卸控制器的优势。在测试过程中,由于控制器本身不会发热,因此大部分时间都保持在室温。整个手持设备的表面温度保持在可接受的范围内。我们测得的温度为 47 摄氏度。

OneXPlayer 空闲时 - 前部
OneXPlayer 空闲时 - 前部
OneXPlayer 闲置时 - 返回
OneXPlayer 闲置时 - 返回
压力测试中的 OneXPlayer - 前部
压力测试中的 OneXPlayer - 前部
压力测试中的 OneXPlayer - 返回
压力测试中的 OneXPlayer - 返回

发言人

据 OneNetbook 称,该掌上电脑的扬声器采用了 Harman AudioEFX 调音技术。在我们目前评测过的游戏掌机中,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 的音效是最好的。扬声器音效强劲,也有一定的底气。

哈曼 AudioEFX 徽标
哈曼 AudioEFX 徽标
内置扬声器
内置扬声器
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.143.12530.236.63126.234.84033.433.55024.7296324.629.68018.532.810013.543.71251452.916013.854.820013.556.725011.856.831511.76240011.868.150011.472.963011.676.480011.379.5100011.278.8125011.675.4160011.775.6200011.975.5250011.972.8315012.471400012.768.5500013.159.2630013.158.4800013.463.41000013.167.31250012.764.7160001269.3SPL24.485.8N0.559.7median 12median 68.1Delta0.78.425.125.526.324.83526.426.830.524.72628.128.720.326.721.328.314.231.415.334.812.639.510.842.811.647.310.550.510.153.710.158.611.162.311.162.710.760.810.558.110.558.510.958.311.158.812.165.611.766.711.753.211.751.711.956.911.851.311.440.323.373.10.428.7median 11.4median 53.71.18.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18Lenovo Legion Go
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Go audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

耗电量

手持设备的最大功耗为 55 W,空闲时功耗在 7 到 12 W 之间。只有在为电池充电时,充电器才有意义,因为它能提供高达 30 W 的功率。充电时,设备功耗为 87 W。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.72 / 0.73 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.66 / 7.11 / 11.7 Watt
Load midlight 46.708 / 56.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø53.1 (50.7-54.2)
Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø83.5 (78.6-90.4)
Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø42.6 (41.5-48.8)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø54.7 (49.9-57)
Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø97.4 (55-101)
Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø41.9 (39.8-54.8)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø15.1 (13.9-19.4)
Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12 (11-16.5)
Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.3 (11.5-14.4)

Power consumption with external monitor

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø50.8 (49.2-52.6)
Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø54.3 (46.8-58.6)
Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø42.2 (38.1-54.2)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø39.4 (35.9-45.8)
Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø22.1 (18.8-32.7)
Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø28.7 (24.3-41.3)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø46.8 (42-48)
Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø42.5 (38.5-47.1)
Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø46.6 (41.8-50.4)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø52 (49.7-53.5)
Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø73.6 (43.5-77.6)
Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø41.8 (40.2-54)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø51.6 (50.5-52.6)
Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø72.7 (57.8-78.8)
Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø40.2 (39.2-42)
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø14.9 (13.8-19.5)
Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.1 (10.8-15.9)
Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.8 (11.4-16.5)

电池寿命

日志电池测试Witcher 3
日志电池测试Witcher 3

OneXPlayer 2 Pro 的电池容量为 65 Wh。这意味着电池容量比 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 的电池少 10 Wh。 Ayaneo Kun.在测试中,两款设备的电池续航时间几乎完全相同。OneXPlayer 使用了一种技巧来实现这一点。当 Kun 的性能保持稳定时,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 会在电池电量低于 20% 时大幅限制其性能。在Witcher 3 测试中,这款游戏掌上电脑的续航时间为 1:14 小时。放电速率为 44 W,电池电压降至空载电压。在满负荷情况下,电池只能再维持几分钟,从这时起,可播放帧率就无法控制了。因此,我们决定将 1:12 小时的结果作为Witcher 3 。

在 WiFi 上网测试中,性能也受到了限制。但这在上网时并不明显,这只是意味着该设备比 Ayaneo Kun 消耗更少,持续时间更长。

Battery Runtime
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
1h 12min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 48min
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 65 Wh
Ayaneo Kun
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh
Lenovo Legion Go
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 49.2 Wh
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh
One Netbook XPlayer 2
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 65.5 Wh
GPD Win 4
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 46 Wh
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
Battery Runtime
17%
-45%
-25%
15%
-31%
1%
WiFi v1.3
648
602
-7%
358
-45%
465
-28%
628
-3%
450
-31%
Witcher 3 ultra
72
101
40%
57
-21%
96
33%
Gaming
122
97
Load
50
77
H.264
568
Reader / Idle
581

Pros

+ 性能非常出色、稳定
+ 电池寿命长
+ USB4
+ 快速读卡器
+ 通过可拆卸控制器和磁性键盘可进行转换

Cons

- 玩家区不理想
- 无网络摄像头
- 屏幕暗且呈蓝色
- 电池电量不足时性能低下

判决

OneXPlayer 2 Pro - OneNetbook 提供的评测设备
OneXPlayer 2 Pro - OneNetbook 提供的评测设备

OneXPlay 2 Pro 是一款功能非常全面的设备。作为一款游戏掌上设备,它可以轻松地与强大的竞争对手一较高下。在电池续航时间、音效和端口选择方面,OneXPlay 2 Pro 超越了 联想Legion Go.OneXPlay 2 Pro 并不明亮的屏幕可能会让一些人感到不爽,但该设备拥有其他掌上电脑无法比拟的优势。首先,我们想说说键盘,它比最初想象的要好用得多。可选配的手写笔让这款电脑更加注重生产力。配件可将 OneXPlay 2 Pro 变成非常小巧的笔记本电脑、Windows 平板电脑或可拆卸式电脑。我们认为,OneXPlay 2 Pro 的概念是可行的。在性能方面,它与Legion Go 大致相当。

OneXPlay 2 Pro 的概念是可行的。无论是作为游戏手持设备还是迷你笔记本电脑,该设备都非常实用。得益于其强大的硬件和可用的配件,它的使用方式多种多样,可以脱离游戏这一主题。

与联想Legion Go 一样,OneXPlayer 的平板电脑也很厚。由于缺少与平板电脑的连接,可拆卸控制器似乎不太实用。好的一面是,控制器连接器不仅能与 OneXPlayer 一起使用,还能与其他所有 PC 一起使用,因此更加实用。Game Zone 作为用于控制性能的应用程序表现不错,但手持控制面板等免费软件提供了更多的功能。我们认为 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 并没有太大的缺点,只要购买附加配件即可。在许多网上商店和制造商本身,该设备捆绑了一个套筒、磁性键盘和控制器连接器。这些配件需要额外支付 50 美元。

价格可能是这款设备的最大弱点。由于该手持设备附带配件,其售价为 1,017 美元(940 欧元),远高于联想Legion Go(800 欧元)。OneXPlayer 2 Pro 有更大的固态硬盘、更多的内存和键盘,但屏幕更小、亮度更低,只有 60 Hz 而不是 144 Hz,也没有 RGB 灯光。我们还怀念Legion Go 的 FPS 模式--不过我们在最近的评测中发现,即使是这种模式也不能完美运行。价格更贵但功能更强大的是 Ayaneo Kun可提供高达 64 GB 的 DDR5 内存。在这款掌上电脑中,Ryzen 7 7840U 的整体性能最佳。

定价和可用性

ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 - 01/26/2024 v7 (old)
Marc Herter

Chassis
0%
Mechanical Inputs
85 / 80 → 100%
Pointing Device
57%
Connectivity
53 / 65 → 82%
Weight
77 / 35-88 → 79%
Battery
89%
Display
79%
Games Performance
78 / 68 → 100%
Application Performance
95 / 76 → 100%
Noise
91 / 91 → 100%
Audio
83 / 85 → 98%
Average
79%
85%
Handheld / UMPC - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > OneXPlayer 2 Pro 游戏手持设备、平板电脑或可拆卸设备评测:配备强大 Ryzen 7 的多面设备
Marc Herter, 2024-01-31 (Update: 2024-01-31)