OneXPlayer 2 Pro 游戏手持设备、平板电脑或可拆卸设备评测:配备强大 Ryzen 7 的多面设备
我们已经测试了 OneXPlayer 2.现在我们测试的是专业版,配备了更强大的 Ryzen 7 7840U.在我们的评测中,这款多功能掌上游戏机在游戏和外部环境方面都表现出了优势。得益于 32 GB 内存和 1 TB NVMe SSD,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 在游戏之外也能大显身手。可拆卸控制器和磁吸附键盘使该设备可作为迷你笔记本电脑或平板电脑使用。
在我们的评测中,我们发现 Ryzen 7840U使入门级 dGPU 变得过时。它有助于 OneXPlayer 作为游戏设备发挥出色的性能。无论是外出还是在家,它都能以 FHD 或 UHD 格式为我们 Steam 库中的许多最新游戏提供可玩的 FPS 水平。
OneXPlayer 必须与强大的竞争对手竞争。在手持设备中,很难避免像 联想Legion Go和 华硕 Rog Ally Z1 Extreme和 Ayaneo Kun.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.9 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 876 g | 43 mm | 8.40" | 2560x1600 | |
85.2 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 942 g | 22 mm | 8.40" | 2560x1600 | |
84.9 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | 845 g | 41 mm | 8.80" | 2560x1600 | |
87.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | 611 g | 21.22 mm | 7.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 864 g | 23 mm | 8.40" | 2560x1600 | |
80.3 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 607 g | 28 mm | 6.00" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
底盘和连接
从外观上看,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 没有任何变化。该设备有白色或黑色两种颜色可供选择,并带有橙色装饰。总的来说,这款游戏掌上电脑是一款坚固的设备,尽管它主要由塑料制成。我们发现 OneXPlayer 2的缺点在专业版中也同样存在。与控制器的连接处有一些不必要的晃动,不过它们也比专业版更容易移动。 联想Legion Go.如果取下 OneXPlayer 的控制器,它们就无法与平板电脑保持连接。要想不受限制地玩游戏,还需要另一个配件,即控制器连接器。
与许多其他手持设备一样,这里没有网络摄像头。该设备是捆绑产品的一部分,其中还包括键盘。键盘通过磁力吸附在平板电脑上,并通过 Pogo 针连接。不过,这也使 OneXPlayer Pro 底部的 USB C 3.2 端口失去了作用。总之,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 可用作平板电脑、游戏手持设备或可拆卸笔记本电脑。在两个拇指杆周围和手柄底部有橙色 LED 灯,可以为手柄增添一些色彩。
WiFi 解决方案在 5 和 6 GHz 网络中运行良好,microSD 读卡器的速度也很快。我们的 Angelbird AV PRO microSD 的传输速度高达 280 MB/s。在 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 中,传输速度可达 251 MB/s。在我们的数据库中,只有少数笔记本电脑能达到这一速度。
尺寸比较
下面列出了 OneXPlayer 2 的手持配置尺寸。不带控制器时,平板电脑的尺寸为 20 x 12.7 x 2 厘米。装上键盘后,OneXPlayer 2 的可拆卸脚踏板尺寸为 20 x 13.1 x 2.5 厘米。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 (Angelbird AV PRO microSD) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (20.9 - 184, n=9, last 2 years) | |
GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 (Angelbird AV PRO microSD) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (84.6 - 260, n=8, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
维护
打开 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 是可能的,但我们无法进一步拆卸背面。要做到这一点,我们必须卸下设备四面和背面的许多螺丝。控制器必须取下,因为控制器下面有一个螺丝盖,设备顶部和底部的两个可拆卸盖子下面也有一个螺丝盖。在内部,我们无法更进一步,因为用于固定主板上扩头的螺丝拧得非常紧、非常牢。至少我们可以看看大电池、风扇、键盘和控制器连接器的子板以及扬声器和 WiFi 天线。打开设备时,键盘附件的磁铁也会受到干扰。与散热片的磁铁相比,它们的安全性要差得多。
输入设备
有一些游戏掌上电脑配有内置键盘,但根据我们的经验,这些键盘并不适合快速触摸键入。GPD Win 4 的键盘 GPD Win 4的键盘比 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 的小得多,而且几乎没有键程。如果您想在聊天时输入几句话以上,那么这里的磁性键盘是游戏手持键盘上第一个可用的键盘。按键与普通笔记本键盘不太一样,但打字手感和 2 毫米的键程带来了良好的打字体验。与此形成鲜明对比的是,小巧而摇摆不定的触摸板令人失望。你可以使用它,但它不太符合人体工程学。点击时,指针经常跳来跳去,无法进行拖放操作。使用触摸屏是更好的选择。如果你愿意,OneNetbook 还会在 OneXPlayer 上捆绑一支数字转换笔,使设备的用途更加广泛。
对于游戏掌上电脑来说,比键盘和触摸板更重要的是:内置控制器。如前所述,两半控制器与平板电脑连接时并不完全稳固,会有一些晃动。在游戏时,我们并不觉得这很令人恼火。按键和触发器的触感与 Dualshock 4 控制器类似。拇指杆精确、易用,并能可靠地找到中立位置。我们希望肩键的阻力能稍大一些。要想不受限制地使用,需要使用控制器连接器配件。它带有一个小型 USB 2.4 GHz 连接器,必须将其插入 OneXPlayer 2 或其他设备才能连接控制器。在我们的测试中,它可以在 7 米以外完美地工作。所有输入都能转换,没有任何明显的延迟。
软件
OneXPlayer 2 Pro 出厂时安装的 Windows 11 几乎是清一色的。仅预装了 "玩家地带",这是一款用于调节设备性能的应用程序。在 OneXPlayer 2 的评测中的评测中,我们对该程序提出了批评。幸运的是,OneNetbook 重新修改了玩家专区。它看起来并不令人印象深刻,但现在能更好地运行全屏游戏。该游戏掌上电脑还有一个新的自定义游戏图形用户界面,但并不是很实用。游戏掌机没有针对触摸屏进行很好的优化。
另一个负面因素:平板电脑顶部的 X1 和 X2 键在用于调节扬声器音量时的分配。左键调高音量,右键调低音量,不够直观。
手持控制面板 是预装软件的一个精心设计的替代方案,可在 GitHub 上免费下载。该应用程序比 OneNetbook 的软件功能更多,设计更好。
显示屏
|
Brightness Distribution: 48 %
Center on Battery: 318 cd/m²
Contrast: 2844:1 (Black: 0.1118 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.53
ΔE Greyscale 6.12 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
81.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.003
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 FLQ8423-24L0, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Ayaneo Kun Ayaneo 2K, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Lenovo Legion Go Legion Go Display, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8" | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | One Netbook XPlayer 2 FLQ8423, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | GPD Win 4 G1618-04, IPS, 1920x1080, 6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | 3% | -18% | -11% | -20% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 91.9 | 93.52 2% | 92.1 0% | 65.6 -29% | 75.4 -18% | 63.1 -31% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.3 | 99.4 0% | 99.56 0% | 92.1 -7% | 97 -2% | 92 -7% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 81.6 | 91.2 12% | 90.09 10% | 67.9 -17% | 71.1 -13% | 64.6 -21% |
Response Times | 17% | 28% | 67% | -22% | 2% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 25.5 ? | 24.2 ? 5% | 20.8 ? 18% | 10.5 ? 59% | 36.8 ? -44% | 26.8 ? -5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 22.73 ? | 16.2 ? 29% | 14.4 ? 37% | 6 ? 74% | 22.8 ? -0% | 20.9 ? 8% |
PWM Frequency | 20000 | 700 | ||||
Screen | -9% | -32% | -9% | -32% | -40% | |
Brightness middle | 318 | 680 114% | 411 29% | 513 61% | 369 16% | 413.1 30% |
Brightness | 287 | 678 136% | 413 44% | 474 65% | 363 26% | 407 42% |
Brightness Distribution | 48 | 91 90% | 80 67% | 84 75% | 89 85% | 81 69% |
Black Level * | 0.1118 | 0.5 -347% | 0.42 -276% | 0.38 -240% | 0.28 -150% | 0.39 -249% |
Contrast | 2844 | 1360 -52% | 979 -66% | 1350 -53% | 1318 -54% | 1059 -63% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.81 | 4 17% | 5.94 -23% | 3.7 23% | 7.1 -48% | 6.97 -45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.93 | 9 -30% | 10.56 -52% | 8.3 -20% | 10.9 -57% | 14.11 -104% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.53 | 1 35% | 2.95 -93% | 2.6 -70% | 1.24 19% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.12 | 9 -47% | 0.92 85% | 5.1 17% | 8.3 -36% | 9.9 -62% |
Gamma | 2.003 110% | 2 110% | 1.93 114% | 2.14 103% | 2.01 109% | 2.04 108% |
CCT | 7707 84% | 7188 90% | 8064 81% | 7732 84% | 8838 74% | 9571 68% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
-3% | -0% /
-16% | 13% /
1% | -22% /
-26% | -19% /
-30% |
* ... smaller is better
出厂时,OneXPlayer 的屏幕有明显的蓝色调。我们的 ICC 配置文件纠正了这一问题,大大提高了主观色彩准确度。deltaE 2000 1.53 校准后的色彩准确度几乎达到了专业水平。肉眼不应该看到任何色差。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22.73 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.05 ms rise | |
↘ 11.67 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
25.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.5 ms rise | |
↘ 25 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
OneXPlayer 的视角稳定性很好,尽管还不如我们习惯的 IPS 面板。从某些角度观察,亮度和对比度会大幅降低。在正常使用时,这不是一个真正的问题。但在室外使用几乎是不可能的,因为光亮的屏幕在阴天时几乎无法消除反光。
性能
与最近的大多数游戏手柄一样,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 搭载了 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U.它配备了强劲的 Radeon 780MiGPU,可谓游戏利器。手持设备可配置 1 或 2 TB 的大容量存储。两种配置均配备 32 GB LPDDR5 内存。正如我们在 Ayaneo Kun一样,AMD APU 与大量内存的结合提供了足以处理大多数任务的性能。这款设备不仅限于游戏。
测试条件
玩家专区允许用户将 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 中 Ryzen 7 的 TDP 设置在 4 到 30 W 之间。与之前的 评测的 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U相比,本机处理器的功耗最多可增加 2 瓦。
处理器
......(英文 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U是一款拥有 8 个内核和 16 个线程的高端 APU。该处理器的 iGPU 是市场上最强大的 iGPU 之一,即 Radeon 780M在我们的测试中表现出色。
几乎相同的还有 AMDZ1 Extreme 。ROG Ally Z1 Extreme 和LenovoLegion Go 都采用了这种 APU。在 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 中,Ryzen 7 的功耗为 30 W,其性能与Legion Go 中的 Z1 Extreme 相同。在某些基准测试中,OneXPlayer 的成绩与 Ryzen 7 相当甚至更好。不过,内存的运行速度相比之下要慢得多,从而降低了基准测试成绩。OneXPlayer 2 Pro 的强大处理器虽然不能完全发挥性能,但仍能取得不错的成绩。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go -2! | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
GPD Win 4 -2! | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 -3! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (11739 - 15074, n=10) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3984 - 15120, n=11, last 2 years) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1088 - 1770, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (1373 - 1742, n=10) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (4469 - 5917, n=10) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1521 - 5917, n=9, last 2 years) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (533 - 678, n=10) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (357 - 684, n=9, last 2 years) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (1025 - 2439, n=12) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (689 - 2439, n=9, last 2 years) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (217 - 272, n=10) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (176.6 - 268, n=8, last 2 years) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (208 - 315, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (208 - 270, n=10) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Kun |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (50087 - 62156, n=10) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19684 - 64454, n=9, last 2 years) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (4657 - 6408, n=10) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3653 - 6077, n=8, last 2 years) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (7310 - 11489, n=10) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4587 - 12026, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (1982 - 2562, n=10) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1348 - 2550, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Kun |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (7399 - 10558, n=10) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4457 - 10713, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (1355 - 1933, n=10) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1278 - 1917, n=10, last 2 years) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (12.5 - 18.7, n=8, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (14.4 - 18.6, n=10) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (46.2 - 63.8, n=8, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (43.4 - 67.1, n=10) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.4601 - 0.678, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (0.4559 - 0.581, n=11) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (17924 - 25901, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (10795 - 25901, n=9, last 2 years) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (78360 - 109745, n=10) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (58068 - 109745, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (3519 - 4847, n=10) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (2707 - 4847, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (83206 - 114294, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (69419 - 114294, n=9, last 2 years) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (11969 - 14822, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (8463 - 14822, n=9, last 2 years) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (40720 - 58482, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (28245 - 58482, n=9, last 2 years) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (57678 - 166333, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (53018 - 166333, n=10) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (801 - 1047, n=10) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (654 - 1047, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (9347 - 13846, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5732 - 13846, n=9, last 2 years) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (26622 - 49287, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (26622 - 38173, n=10) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
GPD Win 4 | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
系统性能
在系统性能基准测试中,缓慢的 RAM 显现出来。不久前,我们在评测 Ayaneo Kun.尽管这款游戏掌上电脑使用了同样强劲的 Ryzen 7 7840U,但内存速度相对较慢也降低了其性能。
OneXPlayer 2 Pro 在日常使用中表现出色。它非常适合办公、流媒体、浏览等多种用途。游戏掌上电脑的核心任务是玩游戏,用户在这方面无需做出任何牺牲。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (5866 - 7157, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5866 - 7149, n=9, last 2 years) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (9068 - 11081, n=10) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (9068 - 10633, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (7323 - 10099, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7323 - 9912, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7204 - 9408, n=9, last 2 years) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (7204 - 8987, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1256 - 1804, n=10) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (840 - 1693, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1261 - 1798, n=10) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (874 - 1649, n=7, last 2 years) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1251 - 1835, n=10) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (808 - 1868, n=7, last 2 years) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1082 - 1775, n=10) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (831 - 1538, n=7, last 2 years) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (188.4 - 322, n=11) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (188.4 - 306, n=9, last 2 years) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (516 - 779, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (509 - 746, n=11) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5900 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (43255 - 70532, n=11) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (32617 - 81717, n=10, last 2 years) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (37399 - 61602, n=10) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25380 - 80481, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (49426 - 92289, n=12) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25596 - 108872, n=11, last 2 years) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (112.6 - 139.6, n=10, last 2 years) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (90 - 137.2, n=11) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC 延迟有问题?OneXPlayer 2 Pro 不会。在冲浪、流媒体和 Prime95 压力测试等标准化测试中,它都没有出现问题。不过,在播放一分钟的 4K60Hz Youtube 视频时,还是出现了 290 帧的掉帧现象。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
在比较中,OneXPlayer 的固态硬盘速度最快。高性能也不会受到持续负载的影响。遗憾的是,我们无法确定这里使用的是哪块固态硬盘。在设备管理器中,固态硬盘只是注册为带有 Phison 控制器的 NVMe 固态硬盘。由于无法进一步打开 OneXPlayer 2 Pro,我们也无法查看标签。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
Global Average -3 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Kun |
Sustained performance read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
在 iGPU 中,只有 英特尔 Arc iGPU可以与 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 中的 Radeon 780M 相媲美。这两款 iGPU 的性能都超过了 Nvidia 的入门级 GPU。这两款 iGPU GTX 1650和 RTX 2050都比现代 iGPU 慢,具体取决于 TDP。现在不一定需要昂贵的专用 GPU 了。这既降低了设备的价格,也降低了功耗。
OneXPlayer 2 Pro 的性能不如最近评测的 Ayaneo Kun相比,它可以与 联想Legion Go.iGPU 的性能在预期范围内,因为Legion Go 还为其 Z1 Extreme这两款 AMD 芯片使用相同的 GPU。
3DMark 11 Performance | 11820 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 187361 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 34281 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7401 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3183 points | |
Help |
游戏
评测游戏的帧速率达到了预期的良好水平。与其他测试过的掌上电脑一样,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 在游戏方面表现出色。全高清设置和高图形保真度的处理都没有问题。如果要使用全屏分辨率,可能只有 AMD FSR 才能胜任。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (17.5 - 33.9, n=11, last 2 years) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 4 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (18.6 - 27.1, n=11, last 2 years) | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (18.4 - 30, n=12, last 2 years) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30 - 51.6, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30.8 - 78.7, n=12, last 2 years) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (24.5 - 38.9, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (13.8 - 29.6, n=37) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (13.8 - 29, n=13, last 2 years) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (32.5 - 52.1, n=40) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25 - 52.1, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (23.4 - 42, n=17) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (24 - 42, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (26.5 - 48, n=19) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (27 - 48, n=11, last 2 years) |
Horizon Zero Dawn | |
1920x1080 Favor Quality | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (36 - 44, n=4) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (33 - 44, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
1920x1080 Ultimate Quality | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (31 - 38, n=3) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (31 - 38, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
2560x1440 Ultimate Quality | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (22 - 24, n=3) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (22 - 24, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Go |
Ghostwire Tokyo | |
1920x1080 High Settings | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (38.2 - 45.5, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (31.3 - 45.5, n=3) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
1920x1080 Highest Settings | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (41.2 - 45, n=2, last 2 years) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (30.4 - 45, n=3) | |
2560x1440 Highest Settings | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (22.2 - 26.3, n=2) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (22.2 - 26.3, n=2, last 2 years) | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 |
F1 23 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (27.3 - 61.1, n=31) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (27.3 - 61.1, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (6.25 - 14.7, n=22) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6.25 - 14.6, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 150.7 | 130.6 | 61.7 | 25.3 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 29.5 | ||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 114.4 | 95 | 65.4 | 60.4 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 37.8 | 28.3 | 20.9 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 48.9 | 31 | 27.6 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 65 | 48 | 44 | 42 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 159.7 | 65.2 | 55.8 | 48.6 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 42 | 41 | 35 | ||
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 48 | 42 | 37 | 23 | |
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 43.2 | 38.2 | 41.2 | 22.2 | |
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 36 | 26.3 | 21.1 | 14.9 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 90.8 | 80.6 | 56.5 | 13 | |
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) | 25 | 20.6 | 20.2 | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 41.9 | 31.8 | 22.1 |
排放与能源
噪音
由于 联想Legion Go和 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 配置了相同的 TDP,因此直接比较这两款设备是公平的。这两款游戏手持设备不仅在概念上相似,在噪音方面也很接近。Legion Go 在满载情况下噪音稍小。在日常使用中,2 到 3 dB(a) 的差异可能并不明显。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.4 / 24.4 / 30.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36 / 39.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.4 dB(A) |
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840U | Ayaneo Kun Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB | Lenovo Legion Go Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM | One Netbook XPlayer 2 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U | GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -9% | 7% | 3% | -9% | -19% | |
off / environment * | 24.4 | 23 6% | 23.3 5% | 26.1 -7% | 24 2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 24.4 | 25.31 -4% | 23 6% | 23.3 5% | 26.1 -7% | 31.2 -28% |
Idle Average * | 24.4 | 25.31 -4% | 23 6% | 23.3 5% | 31.6 -30% | 31.2 -28% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.6 | 34.5 -13% | 25 18% | 27.3 11% | 31.6 -3% | 33.5 -9% |
Load Average * | 36 | 34.9 3% | 37 -3% | 39.2 -9% | 35.7 1% | 45.5 -26% |
Load Maximum * | 39.3 | 50.78 -29% | 37 6% | 39.2 -0% | 43.3 -10% | 49 -25% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46 | 39.2 | 43.3 | 48.6 |
* ... smaller is better
热量
与联想Legion Go 一样,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 也展示了可拆卸控制器的优势。在测试过程中,由于控制器本身不会发热,因此大部分时间都保持在室温。整个手持设备的表面温度保持在可接受的范围内。我们测得的温度为 47 摄氏度。
发言人
据 OneNetbook 称,该掌上电脑的扬声器采用了 Harman AudioEFX 调音技术。在我们目前评测过的游戏掌机中,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 的音效是最好的。扬声器音效强劲,也有一定的底气。
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion Go audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
手持设备的最大功耗为 55 W,空闲时功耗在 7 到 12 W 之间。只有在为电池充电时,充电器才有意义,因为它能提供高达 30 W 的功率。充电时,设备功耗为 87 W。
Off / Standby | 0.72 / 0.73 Watt |
Idle | 6.66 / 7.11 / 11.7 Watt |
Load |
46.708 / 56.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
电池寿命
OneXPlayer 2 Pro 的电池容量为 65 Wh。这意味着电池容量比 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 的电池少 10 Wh。 Ayaneo Kun.在测试中,两款设备的电池续航时间几乎完全相同。OneXPlayer 使用了一种技巧来实现这一点。当 Kun 的性能保持稳定时,OneXPlayer 2 Pro 会在电池电量低于 20% 时大幅限制其性能。在Witcher 3 测试中,这款游戏掌上电脑的续航时间为 1:14 小时。放电速率为 44 W,电池电压降至空载电压。在满负荷情况下,电池只能再维持几分钟,从这时起,可播放帧率就无法控制了。因此,我们决定将 1:12 小时的结果作为Witcher 3 。
在 WiFi 上网测试中,性能也受到了限制。但这在上网时并不明显,这只是意味着该设备比 Ayaneo Kun 消耗更少,持续时间更长。
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18 R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 65 Wh | Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 49.2 Wh | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh | One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 65.5 Wh | GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 46 Wh | Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 17% | -45% | -25% | 15% | -31% | 1% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 648 | 602 -7% | 358 -45% | 465 -28% | 628 -3% | 450 -31% | 531 ? -18% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 72 | 101 40% | 57 -21% | 96 33% | 86.5 ? 20% | ||
Gaming | 122 | 97 | 129.2 ? | ||||
Load | 50 | 77 | 82.6 ? | ||||
H.264 | 568 | 629 ? | |||||
Reader / Idle | 581 | 861 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决
OneXPlay 2 Pro 是一款功能非常全面的设备。作为一款游戏掌上设备,它可以轻松地与强大的竞争对手一较高下。在电池续航时间、音效和端口选择方面,OneXPlay 2 Pro 超越了 联想Legion Go.OneXPlay 2 Pro 并不明亮的屏幕可能会让一些人感到不爽,但该设备拥有其他掌上电脑无法比拟的优势。首先,我们想说说键盘,它比最初想象的要好用得多。可选配的手写笔让这款电脑更加注重生产力。配件可将 OneXPlay 2 Pro 变成非常小巧的笔记本电脑、Windows 平板电脑或可拆卸式电脑。我们认为,OneXPlay 2 Pro 的概念是可行的。在性能方面,它与Legion Go 大致相当。
OneXPlay 2 Pro 的概念是可行的。无论是作为游戏手持设备还是迷你笔记本电脑,该设备都非常实用。得益于其强大的硬件和可用的配件,它的使用方式多种多样,可以脱离游戏这一主题。
与联想Legion Go 一样,OneXPlayer 的平板电脑也很厚。由于缺少与平板电脑的连接,可拆卸控制器似乎不太实用。好的一面是,控制器连接器不仅能与 OneXPlayer 一起使用,还能与其他所有 PC 一起使用,因此更加实用。Game Zone 作为用于控制性能的应用程序表现不错,但手持控制面板等免费软件提供了更多的功能。我们认为 OneXPlayer 2 Pro 并没有太大的缺点,只要购买附加配件即可。在许多网上商店和制造商本身,该设备捆绑了一个套筒、磁性键盘和控制器连接器。这些配件需要额外支付 50 美元。
价格可能是这款设备的最大弱点。由于该手持设备附带配件,其售价为 1,017 美元(940 欧元),远高于联想Legion Go(800 欧元)。OneXPlayer 2 Pro 有更大的固态硬盘、更多的内存和键盘,但屏幕更小、亮度更低,只有 60 Hz 而不是 144 Hz,也没有 RGB 灯光。我们还怀念Legion Go 的 FPS 模式--不过我们在最近的评测中发现,即使是这种模式也不能完美运行。价格更贵但功能更强大的是 Ayaneo Kun可提供高达 64 GB 的 DDR5 内存。在这款掌上电脑中,Ryzen 7 7840U 的整体性能最佳。
定价和可用性
OneXPlayer 2 Pro 目前的售价为 949 美元。在OneXPlayer 商店测试的捆绑包售价为 1.017 美元。.亚马逊提供的设备售价为 1,199 美元。
ONEXPLAYER 2 Pro AR18
- 01/26/2024 v7 (old)
Marc Herter
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.