data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/defaf/defaf3a265cfb1509cbf525b610508c4f6c1dd1d" alt="Teaser"
惠普Pavilion 16 评论:时尚笔记本中的经济型 AMD CPU
总体而言,这是一个完整的套件。
惠普的Pavilion 16 旨在吸引办公用户和多媒体爱好者。为此,制造商将高能效的 AMD 处理器与光滑、时尚的机身搭配在一起。请继续阅读我们的评测,了解这款 16 英寸笔记本电脑的其他优势。Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
判决
在低于 1,000 欧元的价格范围内,众多全能型笔记本电脑在争夺买家的注意力。惠普希望通过Pavilion 16 以时尚的设计吸引潜在客户。精心制作的机身在任何环境下都显得美观大方,而且由于采用了金属结构,其坚固程度令人惊讶。不过,在连接性方面仍有改进的余地,例如没有读卡器。好的一面是,接口位于侧板后部,避免了插拔设备碍手碍脚。输入设备几乎没有什么可抱怨的;除了偶尔的嘎嘎声外,它们非常适合经常打字的人,增强了笔记本电脑的办公友好性。
Pavilion 16 除了采用焊接内存和缺少第二个 M.2 插槽外,在其他方面也有很多亮点。Ryzen 5 8540U 的功耗(稍后详述)和 Radeon 740M iGPU 的性能令人印象深刻。虽然与 760M 或 780M 相比还有很大差距,但它仍能胜任要求不高或较老的游戏。得益于高效的 CPU,Pavilion 16 拥有出色的电池续航能力,在我们的 Wi-Fi 浏览测试中,它的续航时间超过了 11 小时。不过,惠普肯定可以改进显示屏。虽然 IPS 面板提供了不错的对比度,但其有限的色域意味着视觉效果不如一些同类笔记本那么清晰。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
测试时,惠普Pavilion 16-ag0057ng 的售价约为 730 欧元。
作为对比,我们选择了 联想 Yoga Slim 6 14,它采用了上一代 CPU Ryzen 5 7540U以及基于英特尔的替代产品:联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 16(酷睿 7 150U), Yoga 7 二合一 16(酷睿 5 125U)和 ThinkPad E16 G1(酷睿 i5-1335U).这些机型还分别配备了不同的集成图形处理器。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng AMD Ryzen 5 8540U ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $980.00 HP Pavilion Plus 16 inch Lap... List Price: 730 EUR | 1.7 kg | 18.6 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 AMD Ryzen 5 7540U ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $575.00 List Price: 800 EUR | 1.4 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $619.00 List Price: 900 USD | 2.1 kg | 16.99 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U Intel Core i5-1335U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $989.00 List Price: 780 USD | 1.8 kg | 19.85 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $609.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9... 2. $789.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9... 3. $969.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9... List Price: 800 USD | 1.8 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
我们测试的Pavilion 16 型号名称为 ag0057ng,内置上述 Ryzen 5 8540U以及 16GB LPDDR5 6400 内存和 1 TB NVMe SSD。屏幕采用 16:10 格式,分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 像素。惠普预装了 Windows 11 Home 作为操作系统。
规格
案例
正如开头提到的,底盘非常稳定。即使在较强的压力下,大部分区域也几乎不会变形。由于盖子和底座顶部均由金属制成,16 英寸机型总体感觉非常高质,这在这个价位的机型中并不常见。由于颜色较浅,表面几乎不会沾染指纹。不过,铰链经过调整,可以单手打开盖子,但无法避免底座有一定程度的摆动。130° 的最大开启角度比较适中。
Pavilion 16 重量约为 1.7 千克,是测试领域中最轻的 16 英寸平板电脑。同类产品的重量在 1.8 至 2.1 千克之间。高度略低于 1.9 厘米,只能达到桌面中间位置。
设备
接口
惠普在这款全能型产品的左侧配备了一个音频插孔和一个 USB-A 3.0 端口,右侧配备了一个 USB-A 3.1 Gen 2 端口和两个 USB-C 3.1 Gen 2 端口,其中包括 DisplayPort 1.4。最后是一个 HDMI 2.1 输出接口。
交流
Realtek 的内置 Wi-Fi 6 芯片(RTL8852BE)只能达到一般的效果,尽管这也适用于一些竞争对手的设备(见表)。
网络摄像头
网络摄像头(200 万像素)的图像质量略高于(较差的)笔记本电脑标准,不过你也不要指望它能在清晰度和色彩保真度方面创造奇迹。顶部:惠普安装了物理快门。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a9b4/5a9b4d688995d35627ca8cef6478ccfae875d0b3" alt="ColorChecker"
配件
这款笔记本配备了一个相当小巧的 65 瓦电源装置,包括电源线在内仅重 300 多克。
维护
维护需要力量和灵活性。即使拧松了四颗小十字螺丝,底板也非常紧。内部结构相对简单,只是有一个副风扇插槽,但没有被占用(估计是为更强大的配置准备的)。遗憾的是,内存无法扩展或更换,必要时可以更换大容量存储器。
可持续性
惠普在可持续发展问题上花了更多心思。所有包装材料均由纸或纸板制成,这在目前还很少见。
保修
保修期只有 24 个月。
输入设备
键盘
触摸板
从正面来看,触摸板也相对不够出色。Precision触摸板的滑动性能和手势支持都不错,但并不突出。12.5 x 8 厘米的尺寸对于一款 16 英寸设备来说比较合适。虽然外壳有时会发出响声,但下部区域的左右点击都能被可靠地接受。
显示屏
画质让人喜忧参半。至少从 IPS 的角度来看,0.2 cd/m² 的良好黑色值值得肯定,这使得对比度略低于 1,600:1。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 324 cd/m²
Contrast: 1620:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.13 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89, calibrated: 2.99
ΔE Greyscale 4.24 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng CMN1640, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 Lenovo LEN140WUXGA (LEN88AC), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 LEN160FHD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U R160NW41 R2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 109% | -2% | 1% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.6 | 99.9 140% | 40.9 -2% | 42 1% | 41.5 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 62.4 | 100 60% | 61.4 -2% | 62.6 0% | 61.2 -2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43 | 97 126% | 42.3 -2% | 43.3 1% | 42.9 0% |
Response Times | 95% | -5% | -42% | 30% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30.7 ? | 1.4 ? 95% | 32.1 ? -5% | 46.4 ? -51% | 20.7 ? 33% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20.8 ? | 1.2 ? 94% | 21.8 ? -5% | 27.6 ? -33% | 15.1 ? 27% |
PWM Frequency | 480 ? | ||||
Screen | 167% | -9% | 1% | -31% | |
Brightness middle | 324 | 391 21% | 313.3 -3% | 318.6 -2% | 313.3 -3% |
Brightness | 295 | 386 31% | 294 0% | 302 2% | 308 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 95 8% | 82 -7% | 91 3% | 91 3% |
Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.02 90% | 0.35 -75% | 0.29 -45% | 0.37 -85% |
Contrast | 1620 | 19550 1107% | 895 -45% | 1099 -32% | 847 -48% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.13 | 1.89 63% | 4.41 14% | 3.73 27% | 8.42 -64% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.11 | 4.43 73% | 15.75 2% | 16.51 -2% | 19.09 -18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.99 | 1.79 40% | 1.84 38% | 2.03 32% | 2.16 28% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.24 | 1.3 69% | 4.4 -4% | 3.2 25% | 8.3 -96% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.204 100% | 2.3 96% | 2.28 96% | 2.83 78% |
CCT | 7318 89% | 6411 101% | 7395 88% | 6780 96% | 6296 103% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 124% /
144% | -5% /
-7% | -13% /
-5% | -1% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.8 ms rise | |
↘ 9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise | |
↘ 15.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8619 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能
从目前的配置来看,Pavilion 16 属于入门级(iGPU),而趋向于中端(CPU)。16 GB 内存应该足够大多数用户使用一段时间,1 TB SSD 容量也是这个价位的典型配置。现有的(已被占用的)M.2 插槽可安装完整的 2280 型号。
myHP 模式 | 平衡 | 性能 |
赛博朋克 2077》噪音 | 33 dB(A) | 37 dB(A) |
赛博朋克 2077》性能(FHD/超高清) | 9.8 FPS | 10.6 FPS |
Cinebench R15 Multi Score | 1226 分 | 1425 分 |
CPU PL1 | 25 W | 30 W |
CPU PL2 | 30 W | 30 W |
处理器
Ryzen 5 8540U 是一款基于 Zen 4 架构(4 纳米)的六核处理器,可通过 SMT 同时处理多达 12 个线程。在电源模式下,惠普允许 8540U 的 PL1 和 PL2 功率高达 30 瓦,这保证了其性能更加稳定。虽然老式的 7540U 并没有被真正甩在后面,但 AMD 芯片可以与英特尔的竞争产品(如酷睿 Ultra 5 125U 或酷睿 i5-1335U)相抗衡。
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U () | |
Average of class Multimedia (5121 - 50388, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=77, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 8623, n=77, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=77, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=76, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U () | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 2022, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U () | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U () | |
Average of class Multimedia (2759 - 26875, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (13699 - 58844, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
系统性能
无论是在 PCMark 10 还是其他基准测试中,系统性能都不必躲在对比设备后面。除了现代游戏的加载时间(关键词:编译着色器)外,操作系统在日常使用中的反应速度非常快。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M () | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10615, n=72, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M () | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M () | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2050, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2094, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M (285 - 285, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=77, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M (240 - 240, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M (553 - 553, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5898 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (25615 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Multimedia (25586 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U () | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (23679 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 8540U () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
1 TB SSD 来自 SK hynix(型号 BC901),采用 PCIe/NVMe 技术,性能良好。虽然在 DiskSpd 循环中出现了短暂的下降,但其他方面的性能相当稳定。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
Ryzen 5 8540U 的内置 Radeon 740M必须与 760M或 780M必须使用 256 个着色器单元,而不是 512 或 768 个着色器单元,这在速度方面是显而易见的。在合成基准测试中,Pavilion 16 的 740M 与 英特尔显卡 4 核分别为 Iris Xe Graphics G7的 96 个 EU(G7 的 G7(80EU明显慢一些)。不过,值得一提的是,Radeon 740M 在 Yoga Slim 6 等其他笔记本电脑上的性能(甚至)更好。
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 29777 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7334 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 141378 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21552 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4525 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1802 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8.26 - 86, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Radeon 740M (10.4 - 10.6, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Multimedia (9.1 - 117.7, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average AMD Radeon 740M (10.8 - 12.8, n=2) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (9.38 - 141.6, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average AMD Radeon 740M (13.1 - 18.5, n=2) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4.66 - 146.2, n=61, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Radeon 740M (20.5 - 21.5, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Multimedia (9.42 - 120.9, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 | |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Average AMD Radeon 740M (16 - 16.5, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 |
在与 赛博朋克 2077的长期测试中,没有发现任何异常,帧速率保持非常稳定。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 135.8 | 124.4 | 41.4 | 13.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 120.9 | 100.1 | 63 | 53.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 51.4 | 23.1 | 17.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 32.6 | 25.7 | 20.3 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 109.7 | 42.6 | 34.5 | 28.1 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 20.2 | 16.4 | 12 | 10.8 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 21.5 | 16.5 | 13.8 | 10.6 |
EA Sports FC 25 (2024) | 46 | 35.7 | 25.8 | 24.4 |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 27 | 23 | 14 | 13 |
Stalker 2 (2024) | 10.2 | 8.27 | 6.67 | 5.5 |
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 9.89 |
排放量
噪音排放
Pavilion 16 的一大优势是噪音适中。即使在性能模式下,这款 16 英寸机型在我们的压力测试中也能达到 39 分贝(A)的最大值。在游戏等 "普通 "3D 应用程序中,噪音约为 37 dB(A),虽然仍可听到,但不会令人不安。作为比较:在这里,平衡模式只产生约 33 dB(A) 的噪音--这是一个令人愉悦的低噪音水平。在空闲模式下和进行简单的活动(看电影等)时,系统一般会保持令人愉悦的安静,有时风扇甚至会完全关闭。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24 / 25 / 26 dB(A) |
Load |
| 38 / 39 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | 8% | 2% | -0% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 24 -0% | 22.8 5% | 24.6 -3% | 23 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 25 -4% | 22.8 5% | 24.6 -3% | 23 4% |
Idle Average * | 25 | 27 -8% | 22.8 9% | 24.6 2% | 23 8% |
Idle Maximum * | 26 | 29 -12% | 22.8 12% | 24.6 5% | 23 12% |
Load Average * | 38 | 37 3% | 30.8 19% | 32.7 14% | 43.3 -14% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 37 | 37 -0% | 40.8 -10% | ||
Load Maximum * | 39 | 38 3% | 40.8 -5% | 39.2 -1% | 40.9 -5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 31 | 34.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度也毫不夸张。在满载情况下,机箱顶部的最高温度为 42 °C,机箱背部的最高温度为 44 °C,平均温度分别为 37 °C和 36 °C,腕托温度始终保持在可接受的范围内。在闲置状态下,整个机箱的温度保持在 30 °C以下,相应地也比较凉爽。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -3% | 7% | -6% | 4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 39 7% | 37.8 10% | 44 -5% | 35.4 16% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44 | 46 -5% | 38.8 12% | 50.4 -15% | 33 25% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26 | 28 -8% | 25.4 2% | 27.2 -5% | 30.2 -16% |
Idle Bottom * | 28 | 29 -4% | 26.8 4% | 27.8 1% | 30.2 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
发言人
2.0 系统的音质高于平均水平。虽然低音还可以再强一些,但以笔记本电脑的标准来看,整体表现还是相当不错的。
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
能源消耗
Pavilion 16 被证明是测试领域中最经济的代表。空闲模式下的功率为 4 至 6 瓦,负载模式下的功率为 40 至 46 瓦,值得称赞。65 瓦的电源甚至尚未耗尽。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -23% | -27% | -37% | -23% | -112% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4 | 5 -25% | 3 25% | 4.9 -23% | 3.3 17% | 6.92 ? -73% |
Idle Average * | 5 | 6 -20% | 8.5 -70% | 8.3 -66% | 7.5 -50% | 11.5 ? -130% |
Idle Maximum * | 6 | 10 -67% | 8.9 -48% | 8.6 -43% | 7.8 -30% | 13.4 ? -123% |
Load Average * | 40 | 41 -3% | 41.1 -3% | 42.9 -7% | 56.9 -42% | 71.5 ? -79% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 39.1 | 41.2 -5% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 43 | 42.5 1% | 48.7 -13% | |||
Load Maximum * | 46 | 58 -26% | 64.6 -40% | 67 -46% | 62.4 -36% | 117.7 ? -156% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.7 | 44.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Power consumption with the external monitor
电池寿命
加上 59 瓦时的电池,这款 16 英寸设备的运行时间相当长。在亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 的网上冲浪测试中,该设备的续航时间超过了 11 小时,其中两个竞争对手的续航时间稍好一些。
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M, 59 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M, 60 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 71 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 47 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -14% | 8% | -54% | 11% | -7% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 684 | 590 -14% | 738 8% | 314 -54% | 761 11% | 636 ? -7% |
Reader / Idle | 1568 | 1170 ? | ||||
Load | 94 | 100 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
配备高效 Ryzen 5 8540U 的惠普Pavilion 16-ag0057ng 是一款时尚、持久、安静的全能型笔记本电脑,尽管其显示屏可以使用更大的色彩空间。
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng
- 02/07/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.