戴尔Precision 5690 工作站评测：为人工智能革命做好准备
Precision 5690 继承了去年的Precision 5680，将老式的 Raptor Lake-H CPU 换成了集成 NPU 的新式 Meteor Lake-H CPU。这两款产品在其他方面完全相同，都有相同的显示屏和 GPU 选项。建议查看我们对 Precision 5680 的评论了解更多有关该系列受 XPS 16 启发的物理特性的信息。
我们这次评测的是最高端的配置，配备 Core Ultra 9 185H vPro CPU、Nvidia 5000 Ada GPU 和 16 英寸 2400p OLED 触摸屏，售价约为 5900 美元。较低的 SKU 起始配置为酷睿 Ultra 5 135H vPro，仅集成 Arc 图形处理器和 1200p IPS 显示屏，售价仅为 2300 美元。
Precision 5690 的替代产品包括其他 16 英寸工作站，如 联想 ThinkPad P16 G2, 惠普 ZBook Fury 16 G10或 微星CreatorPro Z16P.
更多戴尔评论：
Dell Precision 5690 (Precision 5000 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 16 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 120 W PL2 / Short Burst, 73 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1680 MHz, RAM: 2250 MHz, 95 W TDP, GDDR6, 552.22, Optimus
Memory
32 GB
, LPDDR5x, 7467 MT/s, Dual-Channel, Soldered
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, 10-point capacitive, Samsung 160YV03, OLED, Dell P/N: D3KJF, Controller: SDC4164, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0), 2048 GB
Weight
2.31 kg, Power Supply: 479 g
Price
5900 USD
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.3 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Dell Precision 5690 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 22.17 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 89 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Dell Precision 5000 5680 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 22.17 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 90.2 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 30.23 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 91.7 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 92.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 28.5 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 84.3 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
机箱 - 灵感源自 XPS 16
键盘现在集成了一个专用的 Microsoft Co-Pilot 键，以取代右侧的 Ctrl 键，从而在视觉上将Precision 5690 与 5680 区分开来。
连接性
交流
无线局域网已从英特尔 AX211 升级到英特尔 BE200，以支持 Wi-Fi 7 连接。不过，绝大多数用户仍然只能使用 Wi-Fi 6E 或更老的网络，因此大多数用户暂时不会感受到任何性能优势。
Dell Precision 5690; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1228 (666-1448)
Dell Precision 5690; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1523 (1429-1570)
网络摄像头
24.4 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
15 ∆E
维护
Precision 5690 与旧版 5680 没有明显的内部差异。
显示屏 - 60 赫兹 HDR OLED
2024 型号采用了与前一年相同的 4K 三星 160YV03 OLED 面板和 D3KJF 部件号，视觉体验没有任何变化。一方面，这是非常好的，因为 OLED 面板经过预校准，具有完整的 DCI-P3 色彩并支持触控。另一方面，如果能看到更高的刷新率和自适应选项就更好了，因为标准的 60 Hz 刷新率已经开始老化。
SDR 和 HDR 模式下的最大亮度分别可达 350 尼特和 600 尼特。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Samsung 160YV03 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 355.9 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 350.5 cd/m² Minimum: 3.62 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 348.1 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.97
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Dell Precision 5690 Samsung 160YV03, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Dell Precision 5000 5680 Samsung 160YV03, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE MNG007DA1-9, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 AUO87A8, IPS, 3840x2400, 16" | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST B160QAN02.N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -18% | -20% | -4% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.8 | 99.9 0% | 71 -29% | 68.1 -32% | 98 -2% | 97.6 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.2 -1% | 97.5 -2% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.6 | 97.5 1% | 73.2 -24% | 70.2 -27% | 86.2 -11% | 87.4 -10% |
| Response Times | -1% | -574% | -586% | -533% | -494% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.7 ? | 1.68 ? 1% | 12.8 ? -653% | 13.7 ? -706% | 11.9 ? -600% | 12.8 ? -653% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1.7 ? | 1.77 ? -4% | 10.1 ? -494% | 9.6 ? -465% | 9.6 ? -465% | 7.4 ? -335% |
| PWM Frequency | 60 ? | 60 ? 0% | ||||
| Screen | -11% | -15% | 33% | 36% | 22% | |
| Brightness middle | 348.1 | 345.7 -1% | 510 47% | 521 50% | 514.6 48% | 407 17% |
| Brightness | 351 | 349 -1% | 517 47% | 484 38% | 495 41% | 388 11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 98 1% | 89 -8% | 89 -8% | 90 -7% | 88 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.46 | 0.36 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.18 | 3.59 14% | 2.6 38% | 1.2 71% | 2.4 43% | 1.3 69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.68 | 7.02 -5% | 5.2 22% | 2.5 63% | 4.86 27% | 2.5 63% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.97 | 0.99 -2% | 2.3 -137% | 1 -3% | 0.4 59% | 0.7 28% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 3.1 -82% | 3.6 -112% | 1.4 18% | 1 41% | 2.1 -24% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.13 103% | 2.26 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.3 96% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6198 105% | 6448 101% | 5969 109% | 6682 97% | 6553 99% | 6437 101% |
| Contrast | 1378 | 1447 | 1119 | 1131 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-6% | -202% /
-109% | -191% /
-84% | -167% /
-69% | -159% /
-70% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏根据 P3 标准进行了良好校准，灰度和色彩 DeltaE 平均值分别仅为 1.7 和 4.18。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.74 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.96 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.88 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.82 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将戴尔优化大师设置为超性能模式。我们还通过 Nvidia 控制面板关闭了 ECC VRAM。启用 ECC VRAM 后，可访问内存减少了约 1 GB。
处理器
核心 Core Ultra 9 185H性能几乎与 酷睿 i9-13900H在单线程和多线程工作负载中的表现几乎相同。它确实更受益于 Turbo Boost 带来的更快的初始爆发速度，但这种优势只是暂时的，随后会稳定在与较早的酷睿 i9Precision 5680 相似的性能水平上，如下图所示。
降级到 酷睿至尊 7 165H和 超 5 135H预计处理器性能将分别受到 5% 至 10% 和 40% 至 50% 的影响，这意味着 Core Ultra 5 和 Ultra 7 之间的性能差距要比 Core Ultra 7 和 Ultra 9 大得多。Precision 5690 没有包含任何第 14 代 Raptor Lake-HX CPU，而这些 CPU 的性能提升速度会比酷睿 Ultra 9 185H 更快。不过，作为回报，Core Ultra CPU 包括集成的 NPU，当它们在不久的将来变得更容易使用时，可以加速本地 AI 任务。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Dell Precision 5690 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2340 (2218.28-3164.56)
Dell Precision 5000 5680 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2332 (2200.22-2354.19)
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2785 (2533.57-3082.38)
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2448 (2237.64-2626.57)
HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø3353 (3034.67-3625.49)
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2211 (2130.95-2274.54)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9140 - 14540, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1490 - 2573, n=18) | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9220 - 18676, n=18) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (48865 - 96463, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2394 - 4534, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (66785 - 95241, n=18) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (7255 - 11392, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (24004 - 48020, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (53116 - 154066, n=18) | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (678 - 1341, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4428 - 10078, n=18) | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (44809 - 53918, n=18) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力测试时，CPU 会升至 3.7 GHz 和 120 W，直到几秒钟后核心温度达到 100 C。然后，CPU 会降至 3 GHz 和 73 W，并在整个过程中保持相对稳定。核心温度和封装功耗都略高于我们在Precision 5680 上的记录。
运行时 GPU 板的功耗 Witcher 3将稳定在 72 瓦，尽管 GPU 在 Nvidia Control Center 上的功耗为 90 瓦。结果与我们在去年的机型上记录的结果类似。
| CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 43 | 35 |
| Prime95 压力 | 3.0 | -- | 83 | 53 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | ~3.0 | ~1680 | 93 | 65 |
| Witcher 3 压力 | ~0.6 | 1530 | 75 | 62 |
系统性能
PCMark 10 分数与我们在Precision 5680 上记录的分数基本相同，表明这两款机型在执行传统任务时没有重大性能差异。
系统内存的速度今年略有提高（7467 MT/s 对 6000 MT/s），这反映在 AIDA64 基准测试结果的提高上。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8065 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (69929 - 95718, n=18) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (64619 - 87768, n=18) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51114 - 93871, n=18) | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (121.4 - 259, n=18) | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 仅在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签时显示出轻微的 DPC 问题。在其他方面，以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频也非常完美，没有掉帧记录。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备配有两个 三星 PM9A1PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSD，采用 RAID 0 配置，读写速度分别超过 12000 MB/s 和 9000 MB/s。在循环运行 DiskSpd 时，性能稳定，没有节流记录。
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
9733 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
9693 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
614.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
467.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
5492 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
6963 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
70.31 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
133.2 MB/s
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST -8! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Dell Precision 5690 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12556 (11605.5-12741.67)
Dell Precision 5000 5680 2x SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N RAID 0: Ø5330 (4509.72-5416.31)
图形处理器性能 - 高达 RTX 5000 Ada
与过去相比，Nvidia GPU 的选择并没有改变，因此RTX 5000 Ada 仍然是最顶级的选择。这款 GPU 源自GeForce RTX 4090 ，因此它包含 16 GB VRAM，而不是配置较慢的 RTX 4000 Ada 或 3500 Ada 时的 12 GB。用户有多种 RTX Ada GPU 可供配置，包括 RTX 1000 Ada 到我们的 RTX 5000 Ada 配置。
| 电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 29664 | 30416 | 12057 |
| 平衡模式 | 29771 (-0%) | 27199 (-11%) | 11770 (-2%) |
| 电池供电 | 26674 (-10%) | 20268 (-33%) | 9539 (-21%) |
在平衡模式下运行会影响处理器性能，而图形性能将保持不变，如我们上面的Fire Strike 结果所示。
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | SPECviewperf 12 | SPECviewperf 13 | SPECviewperf 2020
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 -2! | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | |
| Dell Precision 5690 -2! | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 -2! | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 -20! | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G9 -2! | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 -35! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE -16! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE -18! | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST -17! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD -16! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB -18! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE -18! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE -18! | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 38230 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25968 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 14048 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 -1! | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 | The Witcher 3 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | F1 22 | Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | Strange Brigade | Far Cry 5 | X-Plane 11.11 | Dota 2 Reborn
| Baldur's Gate 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra Preset | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| 1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU () | |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (145.5 - 171.7, n=3) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G9 | |
| 1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (124 - 139.4, n=3) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G9 | |
| 2560x1440 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (87.1 - 99.4, n=3) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G9 | |
| 3840x2160 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (48.4 - 53.9, n=3) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G9 | |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
Dell Precision 5690 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU: Ø131 (122-140)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 411.3 | 351.2 | 258.7 | 137.6 | 103.9 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 169.4 | 149.2 | 150.1 | 139.9 | 130 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 196.6 | 165.4 | 132.5 | 103.8 | 63.2 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 132.8 | 113.9 | 88.7 | 74.8 | |||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 144 | 134 | 127 | 119 | 113 | 72 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 405 | 314 | 276 | 252 | 190.6 | 105.3 | |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 196.5 | 179.4 | 145.5 | 124 | 87.1 | 48.4 | |
| F1 22 (2022) | 228 | 224 | 217 | 91.1 | 60.1 | 29.6 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 172.3 | 155.2 | 139.2 | 134.6 | 100.5 | 87.8 | 53.3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 125 | 116.6 | 94.6 | 108.5 | 63.7 | 28.8 |
排放量
系统噪音--响亮而负责
风扇噪音对所选功率曲线很敏感。例如，如果设置为 "安静 "模式，在 23.4 dB(A) 的静音背景下，风扇噪音往往会保持在 25 dB(A) 以下。相反，如果设置为平衡或性能模式，即使在浏览网页等普通任务时，风扇也会更容易发出高达 30 dB(A) 的脉冲噪音。
风扇噪音上限与我们在Precision 5680 上记录的一样，为 51 分贝（A），与许多游戏笔记本电脑一样响亮。当运行 GPU 要求较高的负载超过几分钟时，就会达到这个最大值。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.6 / 24.9 / 30.9 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40.4 / 51.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.4 dB(A) | ||
| Dell Precision 5690 NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0) | Dell Precision 5000 5680 NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, 2x SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N RAID 0 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 6% | -1% | 3% | 6% | -0% | |
| off / environment * | 23.4 | 22.8 3% | 23.5 -0% | 24.5 -5% | 22.9 2% | 24.1 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.6 | 23 3% | 23.5 -0% | 24.5 -4% | 22.9 3% | 27.1 -15% |
| Idle Average * | 24.9 | 23 8% | 29.2 -17% | 24.5 2% | 22.9 8% | 27.1 -9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.9 | 23 26% | 29.5 5% | 24.5 21% | 28.5 8% | 27.1 12% |
| Load Average * | 40.4 | 37.2 8% | 32.7 19% | 48 -19% | 40.6 -0% | 42.9 -6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.3 | 51 -6% | 50.6 -5% | 40.7 16% | 44.1 9% | 44 9% |
| Load Maximum * | 51.9 | 51 2% | 56.6 -9% | 48 8% | 45.8 12% | 47 9% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度的变化是对称的，键盘中心附近的热点温度高达 43 摄氏度至 47 摄氏度。即使在高负荷运行时，机箱底面的温度仍明显低于键盘面。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+0.2 °C / 0.3 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+0.2 °C / 0.3 F).
| Dell Precision 5690 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Dell Precision 5000 5680 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -7% | 2% | -13% | -16% | -24% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 46.6 | 50.2 -8% | 47.2 -1% | 47.1 -1% | 44.8 4% | 56.3 -21% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 33 | 32 3% | 39.5 -20% | 56.5 -71% | 50 -52% | 68.3 -107% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32.4 | 37.4 -15% | 28.1 13% | 28.1 13% | 34.4 -6% | 25.2 22% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29.4 | 31.2 -6% | 25.3 14% | 27.6 6% | 31.8 -8% | 25.9 12% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell Precision 5690 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
在全白背景下，台式机空闲时的最低亮度设置功耗为 8 瓦，最高亮度设置功耗为 29 瓦。由于 OLED 的工作原理，这个范围比大多数 IPS 笔记本电脑都要宽。网页浏览、文字处理或电子表格输入等任务可能会比想象中更快地耗尽电池，因为这些窗口大部分是白色的。降低亮度或选择较暗的颜色有助于延长电池寿命，这一点比 IPS 笔记本更有优势。
在运行较高负载（如 Witcher 3的功耗几乎与我们在旧版Precision 5680 上记录的相同。这印证了我们上面的基准数据，这两款机型的性能差异最多也只是微乎其微。
奇怪的是，在运行 Prime95 压力测试时，即使经过多次重新测试，耗电量也会大起大落。除此之外，性能似乎很稳定。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.02 / 0.25 Watt |
| Idle | 7.9 / 12 / 28.6 Watt |
| Load |
98.8 / 174.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Precision 5690 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0), OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Dell Precision 5000 5680 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 2x SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N RAID 0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 3840x2400, 16" | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 6% | -5% | 10% | -39% | -9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.9 | 8 -1% | 9.3 -18% | 8.3 -5% | 15.3 -94% | 10.8 -37% |
| Idle Average * | 12 | 10.4 13% | 14.1 -18% | 14.5 -21% | 18.2 -52% | 16.3 -36% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.6 | 30.5 -7% | 15.5 46% | 15.3 47% | 28 2% | 16.9 41% |
| Load Average * | 98.8 | 75.4 24% | 133.6 -35% | 91.8 7% | 137.9 -40% | 111.7 -13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 144.5 | 134 7% | 144.9 -0% | 104.7 28% | 189.4 -31% | 152.1 -5% |
| Load Maximum * | 174.8 | 175 -0% | 179.6 -3% | 164.5 6% | 202 -16% | 177.4 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Dell Precision 5690 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø144.5 (137.5-156.5)
Dell Precision 5000 5680 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø134 (127-142.7)
Dell Precision 5690 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø142.6 (96.2-177.2)
Dell Precision 5000 5680 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø148.4 (137-174.2)
Dell Precision 5690 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø28.8 (24.8-47.6)
Dell Precision 5000 5680 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø8.53 (4.31-12.1)
Power Consumption external Monitor
Dell Precision 5690 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø125.7 (55-178.5)
Dell Precision 5000 5680 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø107.9 (99.2-177.8)
Dell Precision 5690 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø171.8 (169.9-173.3)
Dell Precision 5000 5680 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø173.7 (172.6-174.1)
Dell Precision 5690 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø121.1 (104.2-140.1)
Dell Precision 5000 5680 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø133 (123.5-152.9)
Dell Precision 5690 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø140.9 (137.3-144.8)
Dell Precision 5000 5680 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø134.7 (129.4-145.7)
Dell Precision 5690 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø19.2 (8.54-35.3)
Dell Precision 5000 5680 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.01 (4.2-15.5)
电池寿命
运行时间与以前差不多，甚至略有缩短。我们的 WLAN 测试将持续 9 个多小时，而Precision 5680 在类似条件下将接近 10 个小时。
| Dell Precision 5690 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 98 Wh | Dell Precision 5000 5680 i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 98 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G2 21FA000FGE i7-13700HX, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 94 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE i9-13900H, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 95 Wh | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 8% | -6% | 3% | -21% | -37% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 549 | 592 8% | 515 -6% | 567 3% | 435 -21% | 348 -37% |
| Reader / Idle | 1072 | |||||
| Load | 101 | 67 | ||||
| H.264 | 674 |
Pros
+ 在同等尺寸和重量条件下，仍是速度最快的 16 英寸工作站之一
+ 集成 NPU，用于本地 AI 加速
+ 三年标准保修
+ 可观的电池续航时间
+ 更快的内存
Cons
- 与Precision 5680 相比，性能没有重大提升
- 焊接内存；没有 ECC 内存选项
- 点击板过于敏感
- 在负载情况下声音会变大
- 没有新的显示选项
结论--为人工智能革命做好准备
Precision 5680 采用了源自 XPS 16 的时尚新设计。 XPS 16 vPro CPU 和高端 Nvidia RTX Ada 图形处理器。随后，它成为相对于其尺寸和重量而言速度最快的 16 英寸工作站之一。问题在于 Precision 5680仅有不到半年的历史，仍然相当新鲜。较新的Precision 5690 与Precision 5680 具有相同的机箱、图形处理器、显示屏、功耗水平、电池寿命和处理器性能。如果你想省点钱，那么去年的Precision 5680 可以以更低的价格提供基本相同的用户体验和性能。
)(()()
2024Precision 5690 与 2023Precision 5680 的主要区别因素在于 Meteor Lake-H 系列 CPU 上集成的 NPU。因此，当 Windows 针对本地 AI 任务进行优化时，较新的戴尔机型就 "为 AI 做好了准备"。举例来说，如果你已经使用了 Co-Pilot，或者预计在不久的将来会运行更多的 AI 增强型应用，那么Precision 5690 就会因为 NPU 加速而具有明显的优势。否则，大多数 "传统 "任务在最新机型上的运行速度不会明显加快。
价格和供应情况
戴尔现已开始发货 Precision 5690，如果配置酷睿至尊 5 135H CPU、集成显卡和 1200p IPS 显示屏，起价为 2290 美元，如果配置酷睿至尊 9 185H、RTX 5000 Ada 和 2400p OLED 触摸屏，起价将远远超过 5000 美元。
Dell Precision 5690
- 05/08/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Workstation - Weighted Average
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
