微星 Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo 笔记本电脑评测:不到 1 千克的超强图形处理性能
Core Ultra 7 258V 与 Core Ultra 7 155H。
微星更新了其最轻的 13 英寸笔记本电脑,采用 Lunar Lake 处理器取代了旧款的 Meteor Lake 处理器。这些变化在不增加风扇噪音或重量的情况下,提升了电池续航时间和图形处理潜力。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
评语 - 令人印象深刻的性能和端口重量
我们对最初的 Prestige 13 AI Evo 的主要抱怨之一是,当运行 CPU 密集型负载时,处理器的节流比预期的要严重。新的 Lunar Lake CPU 通过降低最大 Turbo Boost 潜能,同时提高运行此类负载时的最低性能水平,解决了这一问题。这样,随着时间的推移,性能会更加稳定和快速,这应该会吸引那些需要处理或编码较大文件或视频的内容创作者或编辑。此外,在 Prestige 13 AI Evo 和更新的 Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo 之间,这些优势似乎不会对电池寿命、温度或风扇噪音产生任何明显的影响。
图形性能大幅提升,根据不同的应用,可提高 1.5 倍至 2 倍。尽管 Arc 140V 远非游戏机,但鉴于微星笔记本电脑的轻巧,它还是给人留下了深刻印象。
Pros
Cons
潜在的竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $1,399.99 List Price: 1400 USD | 970 g | 16.9 mm | 13.30" 2880x1800 255 PPI OLED | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,399.99 MSI Prestige 13 AI+ Evo (202... 2. $1,099.99 MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo Lapto... 3. $1,399.93 MSI Prestige 13 AI+ Evo (202... List Price: 1599€ | 967 g | 16.9 mm | 13.30" 2880x1800 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,269.99 Dell XPS 13 Home & Business ... 2. $949.00 Dell XPS 13-9350 13.3-Inch H... 3. $1,446.99 Dell XPS 13 9340 Business La... List Price: 1400 USD | 1.2 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.40" 1920x1200 169 PPI IPS | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory | List Price: 1500 USD | 1.4 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" 2880x1920 256 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $2,119.99 List Price: 2000 USD | 1.4 kg | 15.95 mm | 13.30" 2880x1800 255 PPI OLED | |
HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,273.02 HP Elite Dragonfly G4 13.5" ... 2. $999.00 HP Dragonfly G4 13.5" WUXGA ... 3. $1,299.00 HP Elite Dragonfly G4 13.5" ... List Price: 1700 USD | 1.1 kg | 16.3 mm | 13.50" 1920x1280 171 PPI IPS |
最初的 Prestige 13 AI Evo 推出仅六个月,微星就已采用更新的英特尔处理器更新了该机型。最新迭代机型被称为 Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo,搭载的是 Lunar Lake CPU,而不是 Meteor Lake。
我们的测试机是中间配置,配备酷睿至尊 7 258V、32 GB LPDDR5x-8533 内存和 1800p OLED 显示屏,售价约为 1400 美元。其他 SKU 可能会配备酷睿至尊 9 288V 或酷睿至尊 7 256V,内存则减半。
竞争对手包括其他高端子笔记本,如 戴尔 XPS 13 9350, 框架笔记本 13.5或 惠普蜻蜓 14.
更多微星评论:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
案例
我们建议您查看我们对 Prestige 13 AI Evo 的评测,因为它与我们的 Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo 在外观上没有任何区别。该系统是市场上最轻的 13 英寸超极本之一,重量不到 1 千克,但与 XPS 13 等较重的机型相比,机箱容易弯曲和吱吱作响。
连接性
Prestige 13 AI 是为数不多的同时集成 HDMI 和 USB-A 端口的超极本之一。我们对该系统没有完全依赖 USB-C 端口表示赞赏。
SD 读卡器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
交流
有趣的是,我们的设备配备的是英特尔杀手 AX1775s,而不是酷睿至尊 7 155H 配置中的 BE1750W。与 BE1750W 不同,AX1775s 不支持 Wi-Fi 7。
网络摄像头
网络摄像头的质量从原来的 200 万像素提高到 500 万像素,图像更加清晰。
维护
可持续性
该机型遵循 EPEAT 银级可持续发展准则,包装主要采用纸板和纸张,笔记本电脑和交流适配器周围采用塑料包装。
显示屏
1800p 三星 OLED 显示屏与以前一样。虽然图像质量很好,没有颗粒感问题,但我们希望刷新率能升级到 90 赫兹或 120 赫兹,因为对于高端子笔记本电脑来说,60 赫兹已经开始显得过时了。
如果使用 HDR 模式,最高亮度可达 598 尼特。否则,如果使用 SDR 模式,最高亮度可达 382 尼特。
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 382.4 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.41
ΔE Greyscale 0.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG ATNA33AA07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo ATNA33AA07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | Dell XPS 13 9350 LG Philips 134WU2, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4", 120 Hz | Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H BOE NE135A1M-NY1, IPS, 2880x1920, 13.5", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 SDC ATNA33AA02-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | HP Dragonfly G4 Chi Mei CMN13C0, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -21% | -17% | 0% | -20% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 67.3 -33% | 72.8 -27% | 99.7 0% | 68.4 -32% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99 -1% | 98.6 -1% | 100 0% | 98.3 -2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 95.8 | 97.8 2% | 68.6 -28% | 72.9 -24% | 97 1% | 70.4 -27% |
Response Times | 117% | -1503% | -1567% | -0% | -1933% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.94 ? | 1.54 ? 21% | 37.3 ? -1823% | 41.9 ? -2060% | 1.88 ? 3% | 48.8 ? -2415% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2.02 ? | 1.44 ? 29% | 25.9 ? -1182% | 23.7 ? -1073% | 2.1 ? -4% | 31.3 ? -1450% |
PWM Frequency | 60 ? | 240 ? 300% | 60 ? 0% | |||
Screen | 3% | 17% | -108% | -50% | -27% | |
Brightness middle | 382.4 | 404 6% | 462.8 21% | 498.5 30% | 362.6 -5% | 408.8 7% |
Brightness | 383 | 407 6% | 435 14% | 464 21% | 368 -4% | 399 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 98 -1% | 87 -12% | 86 -13% | 97 -2% | 90 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.36 | 0.32 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.84 | 2.1 45% | 1.92 50% | 4.27 -11% | 4.66 -21% | 2.02 47% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.66 | 4.3 35% | 3.45 48% | 7.08 -6% | 7.25 -9% | 3.84 42% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.41 | 0.48 -17% | 1.26 -207% | 0.56 -37% | 0.61 -49% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.7 | 1.2 -71% | 0.6 14% | 4.7 -571% | 2.6 -271% | 2.3 -229% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.19 100% | 2.09 105% | 2.2 100% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6475 100% | 6465 101% | 6539 99% | 7417 88% | 6055 107% | 6203 105% |
Contrast | 2436 | 1385 | 1278 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 40% /
31% | -502% /
-246% | -564% /
-329% | -17% /
-27% | -660% /
-343% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示器根据 P3 标准进行了良好的开箱校准,平均灰度值和 ColorChecker deltaE 值分别仅为 0.7 和 3.84。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.02 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.92 ms rise | |
↘ 1.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 0.94 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz Amplitude: 21.9 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8734 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和 MSI Center 都设置为性能模式。Cooler Boost 模式(又称最大风扇模式)也是可用的,但对性能影响不大,下面的基准测试就能说明这一点。
处理器
与酷睿至尊 7 155H 相比,酷睿至尊 7 258V 的 Turbo Boost 潜能较慢,但在较长时间内性能更稳定、更快。在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,这一点非常明显,如下图所示,酷睿至尊 7 155H 配置仅在测试开始时优于我们的酷睿至尊 7 258V 配置,而在第一个循环之后,最终会出现更严重的节流。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Gen 4 21J3001VGE | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
HP Dragonfly G4 -2! | |
Dell Latitude 13 7350 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 -2! | |
Dell Latitude 7350 Detachable | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 2-in-1 Gen 5 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p -2! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G3 21CM002UGE -2! | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 -2! | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 -4! |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Gen 4 21J3001VGE | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (10730 - 10978, n=4) | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Dell Latitude 13 7350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 2-in-1 Gen 5 | |
Dell Latitude 7350 Detachable |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2673 - 2757, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Gen 4 21J3001VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 2-in-1 Gen 5 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7350 | |
Dell Latitude 7350 Detachable |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Gen 4 21J3001VGE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (10.5 - 14.2, n=4) | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Dell Latitude 13 7350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G3 21CM002UGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 2-in-1 Gen 5 | |
Dell Latitude 7350 Detachable | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9215 - 12781, n=4) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (48758 - 63401, n=4) | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2271 - 2817, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (49763 - 49818, n=4) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4319 - 4426, n=4) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (25361 - 33565, n=4) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (38049 - 40753, n=4) | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (499 - 632, n=4) | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4891 - 6930, n=4) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (51458 - 54971, n=4) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
系统性能
PCMark 10 和 AIDA64 内存结果都明显高于 Core Ultra 7 155H 配置,这分别是因为我们的新设备集成了更快的 GPU 和内存。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6265 - 6868, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9295 - 10156, n=4) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (7357 - 9287, n=4) | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9728 - 9967, n=4) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1623 - 1717, n=4) | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1558 - 1646, n=4) | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1846 - 1959, n=4) | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1251 - 1311, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (260 - 303, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (251 - 287, n=4) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (473 - 559, n=4) | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6812 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (108474 - 108783, n=4) | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (82846 - 89204, n=4) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (112837 - 117935, n=4) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (95.2 - 101.1, n=4) | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在播放 4K 60 FPS 视频时,LatencyMon 仅显示出轻微的 DPC 问题,没有出现丢帧现象。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配有 WD SN5000S而不是我们 Core Ultra 7 155H 配置上的三星 PM9A1。该硬盘没有出现我们在最初的 Prestige 13 AI 上遇到的任何节流问题。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
新型集成 Arc 140V GPU可以说是 Arc 8 最大的升级之一。 弧 8的最大升级之一。3DMark 结果快了 1.5 倍到 2 倍,这在诸如《GTA V》甚至是《赛博朋克 2077 》等游戏场景中得到了很好的体现,在这些场景中,Core Ultra 7 155H 配置往往表现不佳。
电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式(开启 Cooler Boost) | 9513 | 21842 | 3426 |
性能模式(冷却器升压关闭) | 9503 | 22043 | 3474 |
平衡模式 | 9376 | 21037 | 3019 |
电池供电 | 9471 | 21837 | 3440 |
如Fire Strike 上表所示,启用 Cooler Boost 或在平衡模式下运行系统,甚至仅使用电池供电,都不会对性能产生重大影响。
3DMark 11 Performance | 11114 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 33012 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8732 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4253 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 681 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo -2! | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 -2! | |
HP Dragonfly G4 -2! |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 161.6 | 155.6 | 67.4 | 26.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 97.2 | 87.8 | 72.1 | 83 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 84 | 46.2 | 31.7 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 56.6 | 42.6 | 36.9 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 92 | 57 | 49 | 45 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 216 | 74.6 | 63 | 55.4 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 72.1 | 53.3 | 36 | 28 |
F1 22 (2022) | 96.2 | 88.5 | 63.9 | 19.9 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 39.6 | 33.5 | 29.8 | 29.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 46.6 | 37.4 | 32.5 | 28.5 |
排放量
系统噪音
在运行要求较高的负载(如游戏)时,风扇噪音普遍比以前大。在性能模式下运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,风扇噪音水平为 45 dB(A),而在 Cooler Boost 模式下则接近 51 dB(A)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.8 / 24.8 / 26.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36.8 / 50.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.1 dB(A) |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V | MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Dell XPS 13 9350 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Micron 2550 512GB | Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U | HP Dragonfly G4 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 6% | 11% | 1% | 16% | 12% | |
off / environment * | 24.1 | 23.4 3% | 24.1 -0% | 24 -0% | 23.3 3% | 23.3 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.8 | 23.4 6% | 24.4 2% | 24.1 3% | 23.3 6% | 23.5 5% |
Idle Average * | 24.8 | 26.9 -8% | 24.4 2% | 25.1 -1% | 23.3 6% | 23.5 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.7 | 26.9 -1% | 24.4 9% | 27 -1% | 24.6 8% | 26.8 -0% |
Load Average * | 36.8 | 32 13% | 26.2 29% | 38.4 -4% | 26.2 29% | 27.2 26% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 44.5 | 34.2 23% | 43.7 2% | |||
Load Maximum * | 50.8 | 40.3 21% | 45.2 11% | 45.8 10% | 27.3 46% | 35 31% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 32 | 27.3 | 32.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
机箱左半部分的表面温度高于右半部分。尽管升级了处理器,但热点的温度与原来的 Prestige 13 AI 差不多。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.4 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Dell XPS 13 9350 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 3% | 8% | -6% | -9% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43.4 | 40.9 6% | 34.8 20% | 42.8 1% | 39.2 10% | 38.6 11% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42.4 | 40.4 5% | 37.4 12% | 45.2 -7% | 41 3% | 40.4 5% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25.4 | 25 2% | 25.4 -0% | 27.2 -7% | 32.2 -27% | 28.2 -11% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.6 | 25.5 -0% | 26.2 -2% | 28.6 -12% | 31.6 -23% | 29 -13% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在运行 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 会在持续约 30 秒后升至 3.6 GHz、40 W 和 82 C。之后,CPU 会迅速下降并稳定在 2.9 GHz 和 27 W,以保持 77 C 的较低核心温度。如果启用 Cooler Boost,核心温度会略有下降,而时钟频率几乎保持不变。
如果玩游戏,核心温度将稳定在 75 摄氏度,而采用类似 Lunar Lake CPU 的戴尔 XPS 13 核心温度为 71 摄氏度。
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | 400 | 32 |
Prime95 压力(冷却器升压关闭) | 2.9 | -- | 77 |
Prime95 Stress (Cooler Boost on) | 3.0 | -- | 75 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.6 | 1800 | 76 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 1.5 | 1950 | 75 |
发言人
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
与酷睿至尊 7 155H 配置相比,在长时间运行 CPU 较重的任务时,系统的要求会更高,因为它的节流能力没有酷睿至尊 7 155H 那么强。在玩游戏时,耗电量也要高出约 50%,这与更快的图形性能是一致的。
Off / Standby | 0.44 / 0.84 Watt |
Idle | 3.5 / 5.9 / 10 Watt |
Load |
38.7 / 61.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, , OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9350 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, Micron 2550 512GB, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, , IPS, 2880x1920, 13.5" | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core, , OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -10% | 27% | 4% | -56% | -5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 4.5 -29% | 1.3 63% | 2.5 29% | 7.1 -103% | 4.1 -17% |
Idle Average * | 5.9 | 8 -36% | 2.5 58% | 5.2 12% | 9.1 -54% | 7.5 -27% |
Idle Maximum * | 10 | 8.7 13% | 4.1 59% | 5.8 42% | 18.4 -84% | 8.2 18% |
Load Average * | 38.7 | 36.1 7% | 40.1 -4% | 47.5 -23% | 51.3 -33% | 35.5 8% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 45.6 | 43.1 5% | 52.4 -15% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 46.3 | 46.1 -0% | 54.5 -18% | |||
Load Maximum * | 61.5 | 65 -6% | 57.3 7% | 61.5 -0% | 65.5 -7% | 66.5 -8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 29.7 | 41.5 | 37.5 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
由于采用了更高效的 Lunar Lake 处理器,运行时间比酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 多出近两个小时。
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 75 Wh | MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9350 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 55 Wh | Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 61 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core, 80 Wh | HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -14% | 54% | -22% | -24% | 19% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 804 | 694 -14% | 1236 54% | 630 -22% | 608 -24% | 954 19% |
H.264 | 1002 | |||||
Load | 169 | 142 | 90 | 192 | ||
Reader / Idle | 3407 | 2296 | 2550 |
笔记本检查评级
MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG
- 11/26/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.