Framework 13.5 Core Ultra 7 笔记本电脑评测:全新 2.8K 120 Hz 显示屏与 Arc 8 图形处理器
Framework 又一次为其著名的 13.5 系列笔记本电脑重新发布或更新,证明了其顽强的生命力。这一次,该机型采用了最新的英特尔酷睿 Ultra CPU,性能比以前更快,并集成了人工智能加速功能和其他一些改进。
我们这次评测的机型为高端配置,配备酷睿至尊 7 155H CPU 和全新 2.8K 2880 x 1920 120 Hz 显示屏,售价约为 1500 美元。如果购买的是不带内存或存储空间的裸机,配置基本的酷睿Ultra 5 125H处理器和标准的2256 x 1504 60 Hz显示屏,起价可低至900美元。
Laptop 13.5 的替代产品包括其他大型制造商生产的 13 英寸或 14 英寸子笔记本电脑,如 戴尔 XPS 13, 联想 Yoga Book 9, 惠普 Spectre x360 14或 华硕 ZenBook 14.
更多框架评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" | 2880x1920 | |
87.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.3 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
86.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.2 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
87 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.4 kg | 15.95 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 | |
91.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.6 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
表壳 - 更多颜色选择
虽然机身没有变化,但 Framework 现在为屏幕周围的边框部分提供了几种其他颜色,包括灰色、橙色、绿色、淡紫色或红色。在其他方面,边框与之前迭代的 13.5 笔记本电脑一样是黑色的。底座和键盘按键仍然分别只有银色和黑色。
说到键盘,Framework 13.5 是 Meteor Lake-H 笔记本电脑中为数不多的没有专用 Microsoft Co-Pilot 键的产品,因此它仍然有两个独立的 Ctrl 键。这可能是由于该机型的设计与操作系统无关。
连接性
四个 USB-C 4.0 端口与去年采用第 13 代英特尔酷睿处理器的迭代产品相比没有变化。与 AMD 版笔记本电脑 13.5 不同的是,这四个端口的功能完全相同,只有某些端口支持 DisplayPort 或使用 USB 3.2 而不是 4.0。
今年新增的扩展卡有多种颜色可供选择,与上述边框颜色类似。不过,这些彩色扩展卡是塑料材质,而不是常见的银色铝合金材质。用户仍可订购熟悉的银色扩展卡,以更好地搭配银色机箱。
SD 读卡器
去年,我们抱怨的问题之一就是缺少可用于全尺寸 SD 卡的扩展卡。现在,Framework 回应了我们的祈求,并提供了我们在所有子笔记本上见过的速度最快的 SD 卡读卡器之一。传输速率接近 200 MB/s,是 MicroSD 扩展卡的 2 倍多。如果你需要在 SD 卡和笔记本电脑之间传输大量文件或视频,那么全尺寸 SD 扩展卡绝对是你的不二之选。
大多数同类笔记本电脑,如 XPS 13、Zenbook 13 和 Spectre x360 14,都不支持 SD 卡、 Spectre x360 14或 Yoga Book 9 13 完全没有 SD 卡读卡器。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel (AV Pro UHS-II V60) |
交流
该系统配备的英特尔 AX210 WLAN 模块与之前的相同,可用于 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3 连接。Framework 没有为 Wi-Fi 7 提供 BE200 配置。
网络摄像头
摄像头质量仍然固定在 200 万像素,没有其他选项,而 Spectre x360 14 等竞争机型则集成了 900 万像素网络摄像头。人们本以为像 Framework 这样的可升级设计会提供多种网络摄像头选项,但遗憾的是事实并非如此。
隐私快门是标准配置,但仍然不支持红外或面部识别功能。
配件
零售包装盒中除了文件和交流适配器外,还有一把螺丝刀。令人讨厌的是,尽管强烈建议至少配备一张 USB-C 卡以方便充电,但包装内却没有任何扩展卡。扩展卡的价格从 9 美元的 USB-C 卡到 125 美元的 1 TB 存储卡不等。
维护
维修程序没有改变。Framework 提供有关如何拆卸和重新组装系统的分步指南和视频。
请注意,冷却解决方案略有变化。
可持续性
可持续发展是 Framework 的重要支柱,有助于将公司与其他 PC 制造商区分开来。底座和顶盖分别由 50% 的消费后回收铝和 75% 的消费前回收铝组成,而 30% 的塑料则是消费后回收的。包装本身全部采用纸板,可完全回收利用。
除了生产和包装,Framework 还通过其官方市场直接向消费者销售全新和翻新的零部件。因此,与竞争对手相比,Framework 的维修更容易,也更受鼓励,尤其是大多数主要制造商都不出售或兜售替换零件。此外,Framework 用户还可以通过官方社区市场向其他 Framework 用户出售不需要的部件或旧部件。.
我们希望看到 Framework 通过提供类似于智能手机制造商的以旧换新服务来扩大优势。例如,如果能提供一种简单易用的服务,接受 MacBook 或 Windows 笔记本电脑,从而降低最终价格,这可能会说服更多用户更换为 13.5 或 16.5 笔记本电脑。 笔记本电脑.
保修
标准保修期为一年,可延长至三年。戴尔Precision 或惠普 Elite 系列等高端商务笔记本电脑可能标配三年保修,但价格往往也要贵得多。
显示屏 - 全新 2.8K 120 Hz 面板
在使用完全相同的 2256 x 1504 60 Hz 显示屏三年之后,Framework 终于推出了第二款面板,分辨率和刷新率分别达到了 2880 x 1920 和 120 Hz。新面板还支持低至 60 Hz 的 Windows VRR,黑白响应时间比旧面板略快,但色彩覆盖率和对比度等其他关键特性保持不变。这意味着,Laptop 13.5 仍然不支持 HDR 和 P3 色彩,这与这个价位的大多数竞争笔记本电脑形成鲜明对比,因为 OLED 在这个价位的笔记本电脑中越来越常见。
尽管 120 Hz 面板比基本的 60 Hz 选项有所升级,但由于其响应时间相对较慢,仍然不适合游戏。在玩快速移动的 3D 游戏时,会出现明显的鬼影现象,这很令人遗憾,因为新的集成 GPU 在其他方面比以前的 13.5 笔记本电脑要快得多。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 498.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 1385:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.27 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.26
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H BOE NE135A1M-NY1, IPS, 2880x1920, 13.5", 120 Hz | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5", 60 Hz | Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 SHP1593, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 SDC ATNA33AA02-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | -3% | 24% | 20% | 19% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 72.8 | 69 -5% | 69.4 -5% | 99.7 37% | 99.8 37% | 98.6 35% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.6 | 99.1 1% | 97.8 -1% | 100 1% | 100 1% | 99.9 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.9 | 71.1 -2% | 71.7 -2% | 97 33% | 89.3 22% | 87.3 20% |
Response Times | -27% | -10% | 94% | 98% | 96% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41.9 ? | 50.4 ? -20% | 43.2 ? -3% | 1.88 ? 96% | 0.77 ? 98% | 1.31 ? 97% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23.7 ? | 31.5 ? -33% | 27.6 ? -16% | 2.1 ? 91% | 0.75 ? 97% | 1.2 ? 95% |
PWM Frequency | 60 ? | 480 | 480 ? | |||
Screen | 18% | 7% | 8% | 29% | 372% | |
Brightness middle | 498.5 | 436 -13% | 429 -14% | 362.6 -27% | 378 -24% | 387 -22% |
Brightness | 464 | 416 -10% | 407 -12% | 368 -21% | 384 -17% | 386 -17% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 89 3% | 90 5% | 97 13% | 97 13% | 98 14% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.36 -0% | 0.28 22% | 0.01 97% | ||
Contrast | 1385 | 1211 -13% | 1532 11% | 38700 2694% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.27 | 1.81 58% | 2.6 39% | 4.66 -9% | 1.4 67% | 1 77% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.08 | 4.73 33% | 6.6 7% | 7.25 -2% | 2.2 69% | 2.4 66% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.26 | 0.45 64% | 1.4 -11% | 0.56 56% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 2.9 38% | 4 15% | 2.6 45% | 1.7 64% | 1.4 70% |
Gamma | 2.09 105% | 2.27 97% | 2.23 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.17 101% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 7417 88% | 6784 96% | 7332 89% | 6055 107% | 6256 104% | 6466 101% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
7% | -2% /
3% | 42% /
26% | 49% /
39% | 162% /
248% |
* ... smaller is better
Framework 不提供出厂校准,因此开箱色温相对较低,为 7417,这对灰度和色彩 DeltaE 值产生了负面影响。我们使用 X-Rite 色差计对面板进行了校准,解决了这些问题,最终灰度和色彩 DeltaE 值分别为 2.4 和 1.26。我们建议使用上述经过校准的 ICM 配置文件,以获得更高的显示效果。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.5 ms rise | |
↘ 12.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
41.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.7 ms rise | |
↘ 23.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
新的 120 Hz 面板比基本的 60 Hz 面板亮度稍高(500 nit 对 400 nits)。不过,亮度的提高不足以在户外产生明显的差异,因此只有在阳光下或明亮的阴天时才能看到。
性能 - 与 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 相当
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。
处理器
值得注意的是,2021 年最初的 Laptop 13.5 配备的是酷睿 U 系列处理器。由于底层冷却解决方案基本保持不变,因此采用 Core-P 和 Core-H 的配置在受压时更容易出现节流现象。不幸的是,我们看到 酷睿至尊 7 155H在我们的 CineBench R15 xT 循环测试中,在第一或第二个循环后,性能会下降 22%,如下图所示。酷睿i7-1370P 酷睿 i7-1370P在去年的笔记本电脑 13.5 中也会表现出类似的性能下降,直至与酷睿 Ultra 7 性能相当。因此,从酷睿 i7-1370P 升级到酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 的用户在处理器性能方面几乎没有任何优势。
酷睿至尊 7 155H 的优势在于它集成了用于人工智能加速的 NPU。不过,就目前而言,它在大多数使用场景中的应用都很有限。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=45) | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=45) | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=45) | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=45) | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=45) | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=45) | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=45) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=45) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=45) | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=45) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U |
压力测试
平均有效时钟频率和 CPU 封装功率将提升至 3 GHz 和 44 W,持续时间只有几秒钟,直到达到 96 C。此后,CPU 将下降并稳定在 1.3 GHz 和 31 W,以保持 82 C 的低温核心温度。这也表明,由于散热限制,英特尔设备的 Turbo Boost 效能并不能持续很长时间,这与我们在上文 CineBench R15 xT 循环中的观察结果一致。
运行游戏时的核心温度会显示出更有趣的差异。在这种情况下,我们的酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器会稳定在 85 摄氏度,明显低于酷睿 i7-1370P 配置(93 摄氏度),但高于 Ryzen 7 7840U 配置(73 摄氏度)。这些差异可能表明了 Model 13.5 上三种不同 iGPU(Iris Xe 96 EUs、Arc 8 和 Radeon 780M)之间的效率水平。
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 54 |
Prime95 压力 | 1.3 | -- | 82 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 0.7 | 1100 | 82 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 0.4 | 1650 | 85 |
系统性能
PCMark 结果平均领先于去年的 Laptop 13.5,在数字内容创建子测试中优势最大,原因是集成的 Arc 8 GPU 速度更快。另一方面,Ryzen 7 7840U 版本因其更快的多核性能而在生产力子测试中占据优势。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=32) | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8580 - 11289, n=32) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=32) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (4985 - 10709, n=32) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=32) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1291 - 1798, n=31) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=31) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (939 - 1802, n=31) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (252 - 299, n=32) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (234 - 309, n=27) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (517 - 614, n=33) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6853 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=45) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=45) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=45) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (120.2 - 233, n=45) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 显示,在打开我们主页的多个标签页时会出现轻微的 DPC 问题。与我们在 AMD 版上观察到的情况不同,以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频时没有出现掉帧现象。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
为了保持一致性,Framework 在结账时只提供西部数据的固态硬盘,而其他 PC 制造商则倾向于采用不同制造商生产的各种固态硬盘。西部数据 西部数据 SN850X是 PC SN740 系列的升级版,去年在 13.5 笔记本电脑上使用。传输速率可达 7000 MB/s,而 PC SN740 为 5200 MB/s,但如下图所示,在进行 DiskSpd 循环测试 5 或 6 分钟后,会出现一些非常轻微的节流现象。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
从去年的酷睿 i7-1370P 跳转到新的流星湖-H 平台,最大的收获之一就是集成了 Arc 8GPU 的速度明显快于老旧的 Iris Xe 96 EUs快了 1.5 倍到 2 倍。因此,这是购买酷睿 Ultra 13.5 笔记本电脑而非酷睿 i7 13.5 笔记本电脑的最大原因之一,尤其是因为处理器性能同比持平。这也使英特尔与竞争对手 Radeon 680M/780M 系列.
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理分数 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 8513 | 20723 | 2856 |
平衡模式 | 8469 (-1%) | 19171 (-5%) | 2780 (-3%) |
电池电量 | 7354 (-14%) | 18469 (-11%) | 2361 (-17%) |
如Fire Strike 上表所示,在平衡模式而非性能模式下运行不会造成重大性能损失。使用电池供电对性能的影响为 10%-15%。
3DMark 11 Performance | 12550 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28946 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7671 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3725 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 753 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
只要设置为低端或中低端,Arc 8 就能以 1080p 运行大多数游戏。即便如此,游戏并不是 Laptop 13.5 的主要功能。游戏玩家可能会选择 Laptop 16 或 华硕 ROG Flow X13来代替。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 144.9 | 140.1 | 43.5 | 17.5 | 12.2 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 102.7 | 76.9 | 67.2 | 62.1 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 70 | 38 | 27.2 | 20.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 56 | 41.6 | 33.7 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 62 | 42 | 40 | 38 | 28 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 162.1 | 70.6 | 59.6 | 48.5 | 34.9 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 50.8 | 44.5 | 30.7 | 24.2 | 16.6 |
F1 22 (2022) | 73.9 | 68.6 | 52.9 | ||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 36.9 | 30.7 | 26.7 | 25.7 | 17.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 34.3 | 27.8 | 23.4 | 21.1 |
排放量
系统噪音 - 低频低,高频高
在运行要求较高的负载时,风扇噪音可能会小一些,但其行为并没有改变,因为它仍然比其他大多数笔记本电脑更有规律地跳动。即使设置为平衡模式,内部风扇也有从静音到嘈杂的趋势,中间没有太大的变化。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.1 / 25.1 / 27 dB(A) |
Load |
| 38.4 / 45.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G | Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 512GB | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04 | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 5% | 1% | 16% | 13% | 2% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 22.6 6% | 25.1 -5% | 23.3 3% | 23.4 2% | 25.1 -5% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.1 | 22.6 6% | 25.1 -4% | 23.3 3% | 23.4 3% | 25.1 -4% |
Idle Average * | 25.1 | 22.6 10% | 25.1 -0% | 23.3 7% | 23.4 7% | 25.1 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 27 | 24.2 10% | 25.1 7% | 24.6 9% | 25.6 5% | 25.1 7% |
Load Average * | 38.4 | 35.8 7% | 37.4 3% | 26.2 32% | 25.6 33% | 35.9 7% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 43.7 | |||||
Load Maximum * | 45.8 | 48.9 -7% | 42.5 7% | 27.3 40% | 32.6 29% | 42.2 8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.5 | 42.5 | 27.3 | 30.9 | 39.3 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
尽管处理器不同,但表面温度与我们在 AMD 版机型上记录的温度非常相似。这一结果在意料之中,因为 Framework 在两个版本上都采用了类似的 TDP 值,机箱或散热解决方案也没有其他重大变化。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+0.1 °C / 0.2 F).
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -3% | 7% | -3% | 9% | 0% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.8 | 42 2% | 41 4% | 39.2 8% | 39.3 8% | 43.1 -1% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45.2 | 47.4 -5% | 43.5 4% | 41 9% | 45 -0% | 50.2 -11% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.2 | 28.8 -6% | 25.3 7% | 32.2 -18% | 23.8 12% | 25.8 5% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.6 | 29.6 -3% | 25.5 11% | 31.6 -10% | 24 16% | 26.4 8% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
检查不同音乐类型/电话中内置扬声器的声音(音效、噪音、低音、最大音量......),比较设备类别、特殊功能(软件)......如何连接外部音频设备?测试适当的音频接口。分析粉红噪声图。
短评:分析扬声器。
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
即使考虑到我们的 2.8K 120 Hz 显示器,台式机怠速运行时的功耗也在 2 W 至 6 W 之间,实际上低于去年的 Core-P 配置。Raptor Lake-P 和 Meteor Lake-H 之间更高的 CPU 效率抵消了我们要求更高的显示器。
当引入游戏或 Prime95 等要求更高的负载时,系统功耗与我们在 Core-P 配置上记录的功耗仅相差几瓦。这一点尤其值得注意,因为我们的 Arc 8 GPU 可以提供上述 2 倍的性能,而无需消耗更多电能,从而大大提高每瓦性能。
该机型配备了与 2021 型号相同的超小型 60 W USB-C AC 适配器。
Off / Standby | 0.38 / 1.1 Watt |
Idle | 2.5 / 5.2 / 5.8 Watt |
Load |
47.5 / 61.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, , IPS, 2880x1920, 13.5" | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2550 512GB, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core, , OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -19% | -25% | -98% | 2% | -17% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.5 | 4 -60% | 3.8 -52% | 7.1 -184% | 3.2 -28% | 3.6 -44% |
Idle Average * | 5.2 | 6.5 -25% | 7 -35% | 9.1 -75% | 4.2 19% | 6.6 -27% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.8 | 6.8 -17% | 7.3 -26% | 18.4 -217% | 4.9 16% | 7.4 -28% |
Load Average * | 47.5 | 48 -1% | 52.6 -11% | 51.3 -8% | 40.5 15% | 47.1 1% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 52.4 | |||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 54.5 | |||||
Load Maximum * | 61.5 | 55.2 10% | 62.7 -2% | 65.5 -7% | 68.6 -12% | 54.3 12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 52.3 | 38.3 | 41.5 | 37.9 | 47.4 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
WLAN 运行时间为 10.5 小时,比酷睿 i7-1370P 版本长,但比 Ryzen 7 版本短。由于分辨率和刷新率较低,如果配置要求较低的基本显示选项,电池续航时间预计会更长。
从空电到满电需要不到 90 分钟。
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 61 Wh | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 61 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 55 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core, 80 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 68 Wh | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 15% | 34% | -3% | 16% | 30% | |
Reader / Idle | 2296 | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 630 | 726 15% | 769 22% | 608 -3% | 555 -12% | 774 23% |
Load | 90 | 131 46% | 129 43% | 123 37% | ||
H.264 | 1053 | 999 | 1046 |
Pros
Cons
结论--三年后依然多才多艺
笔记本电脑 13.5 的弹性和熟悉的设计意味着它可以继续支持新的和即将推出的处理器,而且对制造商和消费者来说成本更低。从可维修性和可持续发展的角度来看,这无疑是个好消息,但同时也意味着原定于 2021 年推出的笔记本电脑所存在的大多数缺点都将被消除。 最初 2021 年推出将在未来几年继续困扰该系列。例如,较新的 SKU 支持更快的 Core-P 和 Core Ultra CPU,而不仅仅是 Core-U,但它们对老化的散热解决方案的要求也更高,因此与采用相同 Core 选项的竞争笔记本电脑相比,它们往往会出现更严重的耗电现象,如 联想 ThinkPad P14s G5.换句话说,你只能使用较旧的部件,任何重大的内部或外部升级,如蒸汽腔或液态金属以改善散热或风扇噪音,都有可能使该系列的可维修性复杂化。
如果您对集成的 NPU 没有兴趣,那么您可以通过以下配置获得基本相同的 CPU 和 GPU 性能 Ryzen 7 7840U 配置比我们的 Core Ultra 7 配置便宜数百美元。
酷睿至尊 7 13.5 笔记本电脑集成了人工智能支持,图形性能比英特尔旧款产品更快。除此之外,与价格较低的现有 Ryzen 7 配置相比,它并没有太多其他优势。
该机型在其他方面的升级,如新的显示屏、更快的 iGPU 和额外的扩展卡,都有助于让原本陈旧的 13.5 笔记本电脑在与大厂商不断发展的超极本竞争时保持竞争力。但请记住,你必须用更薄、更轻、更坚固的设计来换取更高的可修复性。
价格和供应情况
框架公司直接向消费者销售 13.5 笔记本电脑。基本的酷睿 51200p 配置起价为 900 美元,而我们评测的配置售价为 1500 美元。而我们评测的配置售价为 1500 美元。
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H
- 08/15/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.