宏碁 Swift Go 14 AI 笔记本电脑评测：搭载骁龙处理器的 MacBook Air 竞争对手的 24 小时运行时间
极具狂欢观看潜力。
适用于 Windows 笔记本电脑的 ARM 处理器已是第三次出现。在新款宏碁 Swift Go 14 AI 中，ARM CPU 为大容量电池腾出了空间，从而带来了出色的运行时间。但骁龙笔记本电脑的性能又如何呢？我们来仔细看看！Christian Hintze, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论：电池续航时间是 Swift Go 14 的绝对王牌
我们的测试机型宏碁 Swift Go 14 AI 配备了性能较弱的 Snapdragon ARM 处理器之一，但很明显，这款办公设备不仅仅是可用而已。如果对应用程序进行适当的 ARM 优化，该芯片在性能方面肯定能与英特尔和 AMD 的替代产品相媲美。不过，运行时间确实给我们留下了深刻印象--在视频测试中，24 小时的运行时间是一项相当了不起的成就，对于某些客户来说，这无疑是一个卖点！
尽管如此，Windows 的 ARM 处理器仍未实现其目标，因为各种应用程序尚未针对 ARM 进行优化，因此运行性能相当一般。SoC 的另一个缺点是几乎没有任何部件可以更换，内存和 WiFi 模块都是永久焊接的，甚至 SSD 也隐藏在宽带电缆后面。还有，为什么宏碁在机身尺寸略有增加的情况下，居然去掉了这么多接口？如果不是因为出色的电池续航时间，与配备英特尔 CPU 的功能更强大的前代产品相比，宏碁几乎没有任何优势可言。也许会有，因为噪音和温度也是办公笔记本电脑的重要因素。
如果您需要更高的性能和兼容性，那么配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器的 配备英特尔酷睿至尊 7 处理器的前代产品仍是不错的选择，但 Snapdragon 型号的电池续航时间几乎是前者的三倍。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
宏碁商店本身目前只提供一种基于骁龙 X1P-64-100 CPU 的 Swift Go 14 AI 配置，售价为 1,199 欧元。不过，我们的测试机型已经有了更低的价格，在比较平台 Geizhals 上的起价为 879 欧元。你可以在Notebooksbilliger.de 网站上以 899 欧元的价格买到它。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Geizhals | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 84.8%  | Acer Swift Go 14 AI Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | 1.3 kg | 16.55 mm | 14.50" 2560x1600 208 PPI IPS | |
2. 85.9%  | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 1.3 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" 2560x1600 216 PPI IPS LED | |
3. 85.1%  | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory | 1.2 kg | 10.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
4. 83.4%  | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory | 1.6 kg | 16.64 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | |
5. 83.5%  | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
6. 92.4% v7 (old)  | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU Apple M3 ⎘ Apple M3 10-Core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" 2560x1664 225 PPI IPS |
相比之下 宏碁 Swift 14相比，宏碁 Swift Go 14 价格更低，移动性更强，但在一定程度上牺牲了性能。去年，我们 宏碁 Swift Go 14配备 酷睿 i5-1335U和后来的 Swift Go 14配备 酷睿至尊 7 155H测试；2024 年，宏碁在移动性方面更进一步，采用了 骁龙 X Plus X1P-42-100在我们的 Swift Go AI 中，骁龙 X Plus X1P-42-100 带来了更强的续航能力和移动性，但也带来了一些其他挑战。与此同时，采用全新 ARM 处理器的 Swift Go 与它的同类产品 MacBook Air 更加相似。我们将研究它能否成为 MacBook Air 的经济型替代产品。
规格
外壳和功能 - Swift Go 14 全面升级设计
2024 年，宏碁对 Swift Go 14 进行了设计升级，因此它现在在很多方面都与前代产品存在视觉差异。其中，显示屏边框经过了重新设计，出风口不再仅仅位于背面右侧，而是延伸到了两个铰链之间的整个长度，配色变得更深，1440p 网络摄像头现在有了物理快门，打开角度变成了 180 度，宏碁的标志被移到了不同的位置，底板也经过了重新设计，等等。
拆卸 10 颗同样大小的螺丝需要使用 T6 螺丝刀。不过，轻松撬开底板的作用也很有限，因为除了风扇之外，内部并没有太多需要维修的地方。即使是固态硬盘也被隐藏在宽大的主板线缆下，内存和 WLAN 模块等大多数组件都是永久安装或焊接的。大电池是用螺丝固定的。
连接方式也发生了变化，但并不一定是为了更好，因为宏碁干脆省略了 HDMI 端口。现在，任何想要连接外部显示器的人都必须直接或通过底座使用 USB-C。前代产品的 Kensington 接口和 MicroSD 卡插槽也已成为历史。至少现在有了网络摄像头快门，还支持 WiFi 7。遗憾的是，没有增加其他端口，因此在这方面前代产品明显领先。新款 Swift Go 比 2023 型号稍大，也稍厚。
可持续性
宏碁使用 100% 可回收材料进行包装。其中大部分由纸板制成，但在某些情况下仍使用塑料。宏碁还声称，Swift Go 14 AI 所使用的塑料中有 21.56% 是由 PCR（即回收塑料）制成的。
输入设备 - 副驾驶员用灯
键盘布局保持不变，单色背光仍有两种亮度可供选择。我们发现按键的键程较短，但反馈仍然很好，只是可以再清晰一些。总的来说，用它打字既快又好，但还有更好的机型。打字噪音适中。
触摸板干燥时很滑，尺寸约为 12.6 x 7.7 厘米，右上角有一个醒目的弧形 LED 图案，每当我们调用副驾驶功能时，它就会亮起。集成的按键触发可靠，噪音适中。
显示屏 - 2.5K，但 Go 不再有 OLED 显示屏可供选择
显示屏采用 14.5 英寸 IPS 雾面面板，分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素，频率为 120 Hz。亮度相当一般，约为 341 尼特，照度非常均匀，为 93%。对比度尚可，但前代产品的 OLED 面板几乎在所有方面都优于新面板。响应时间非常慢。虽然显示屏的分辨率为 2.5K，而且性能也不差，但与前代产品的 OLED 版本相比，我们还是发现它的性能略有下降，因为目前显然没有其他显示屏可供选择。
有趣的是，宏碁宣传的是边缘到边缘的玻璃；而在我们的测试机型中，面板内部被塑料边框包围。根据脚注，功能可能因地区而异，但这是否真的指显示屏边框至少值得怀疑。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 357.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1192:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.27 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.95
ΔE Greyscale 5.14 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
73.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI MNE507QS2-2 CSOT T9, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5", 120 Hz | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X NE140QDM-NX4, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 14", 144 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 ATNA40CU07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 18% | 25% | -45% | 20% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 71.2 | 70.8 -1% | 97 36% | 99.75 40% | 38 -47% | 98.4 38% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99 | 98 -1% | 100 1% | 99.99 1% | 56 -43% | 99.9 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.3 | 71.6 -2% | 85.2 16% | 98.56 34% | 39.3 -46% | 87.9 20% |
| Response Times | -24% | 97% | 60% | 5% | -32% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32 ? | 36.3 ? -13% | 0.83 ? 97% | 2.2 ? 93% | 29 ? 9% | 34.5 ? -8% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 17.5 ? | 23.4 ? -34% | 0.69 ? 96% | 12.8 ? 27% | 17.3 ? 1% | 27.2 ? -55% |
| PWM Frequency | 240 | 300 | ||||
| Screen | 20% | 33% | 37% | -71% | 30% | |
| Brightness middle | 357.5 | 457 28% | 392 10% | 388 9% | 313.6 -12% | 525 47% |
| Brightness | 341 | 457 34% | 398 17% | 391 15% | 301 -12% | 506 48% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 95 2% | 97 4% | 98 5% | 91 -2% | 92 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.12 60% | 0.0411 86% | 0.27 10% | 0.42 -40% | |
| Contrast | 1192 | 3808 219% | 9440 692% | 1161 -3% | 1250 5% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.27 | 4.9 -50% | 1.3 60% | 6.32 -93% | 6.79 -108% | 1.4 57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.83 | 8.5 -24% | 3.2 53% | 8.82 -29% | 22.76 -233% | 2.8 59% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.95 | 1.7 -79% | 4.79 -404% | 3.53 -272% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.14 | 5.7 -11% | 2.3 55% | 2.61 49% | 5.6 -9% | 2 61% |
| Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.25 98% | 2.24 98% | 1.772 124% | 2.13 103% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6026 108% | 7647 85% | 6517 100% | 6202 105% | 6050 107% | 6876 95% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
9% | 49% /
40% | 41% /
38% | -37% /
-55% | 6% /
18% |
* ... smaller is better
遗憾的是，该面板的出厂校准效果不佳；我们的手动校准将灰度和色彩的平均 DeltaE 值降至 1 以下。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
新款 Swift Go 14 能很好地应对 11 月灰蒙蒙的天气。在这里，它也呈现出良好的可视角度，没有明显的反光。
性能 - Swift Go 14 变得更慢了
新款 Swift Go 14 的核心是 ARM CPU Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100，它集成了一个 NPU 和一个图形处理器。此外，还配备了 16 GB 的永久安装内存，以及 1 TB NVMe SSD。Swift Go 14 AI 特别适合办公工作负载和 AI 应用，这要归功于 SoC，它在骁龙 X Plus CPU 系列中处于相当靠后的位置，这也是宏碁主要宣传的。
测试条件
制造商预装了 Acer Sense 软件作为性能中心。遗憾的是，宏碁最近因滥用其软件作为数据收集机器和投放广告而声名狼藉，Swift Go 14 也不例外。下面的截图是 Acer Sense 收集的所有数据的不完整列表（摘自 Acer Sense 隐私政策）。我们还不得不点击掉通过 Acer Jumstart 弹出的游戏广告。而在首次启动 Windows 11 Home 后，我们就被两个弹出窗口 "迎接"，它们分别用于配置 Acer Sense 和 Acer Quickpanel。我们非常欢迎笔记本电脑制造商被迫尽量减少数据收集，并在广告方面更加克制，因为有些制造商显然无法做到自愿克制。
我们使用 Acer Sense 的性能模式进行基准测试。由于与 Windows 模式的交互尚不明确，我们也将 Windows 设置为性能模式。
处理器
高通 高通骁龙 X Plus X1P-42-100高通骁龙 X Plus X1P-42-100 SoC 拥有 8 个内核，最高主频为 3.4 GHz。该 SoC 包括一个用于加速人工智能应用的 45 TOPS NPU 和一个 GPU，但属于骁龙 X Plus 系列中性能较弱的 SoC 之一。
不过，至少在 ARM 版本的 Cinebench 2024 等原生应用中，CPU 的性能还算不错。骁龙处理器的潜力至少在多线程测试中得到了充分体现，尽管单线程性能在这里有所下降。
在 Geekbench 6.3 中，如果下载同样适用于 ARM 的最新版本，分数会比我们通常使用的英特尔/AMD 版本高出很多。我们的多核分数从 7596 分提高到 11438 分，单核分数从 1896 分提高到 2404 分。我们的 Snapdragon 之前几乎没有竞争力，现在至少跟上了。
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
如果 Snapdragon 必须模拟基准，性能就会大幅下降，这反映在我们的性能评级中。Cinebench R15 在 Swift Go 上的运行仍然出人意料地好，但在所有的 CPU 测评中，我们的测试机型不幸地排在了最后一位，与Apple 、英特尔和 AMD 相比毫无胜算。在 Apple M3虽然也是 ARM CPU，但 M3 甚至在这次比较中拔得头筹，这表明 ARM CPU 也可以有更好的表现。老大哥 骁龙 X Elite X1E-80-100在三星 Galaxy Book4表现更好，但也不是很好。
毕竟，在电池模式下，性能似乎几乎没有进一步下降。我们现在测量的是 1504 点，而不是电源连接下的 1554 点，下降幅度可以忽略不计。
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU -9! | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 -2! | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (6442 - 8284, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1104 - 1128, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2361 - 3097, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (406 - 425, n=4) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1383 - 1556, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (207 - 215, n=4) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (399 - 571, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (29238 - 32811, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4087 - 4675, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (6604 - 11438, n=5) | |
| Average of class Office (662 - 14767, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2255 - 2437, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Office (457 - 2769, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4457 - 6244, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1486 - 1576, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4.6 - 6.02, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (59 - 62.7, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (0.728 - 0.774, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4739 - 6185, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (14528 - 17585, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2191 - 2614, n=4) | |
| Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (44346 - 48532, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1240 - 1502, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (8416 - 9929, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (37646 - 45232, n=4) | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (478 - 521, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2262 - 3399, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (31839 - 32139, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
系统性能
PCMark 10 在 ARM 架构的测试中总是中途停止，每次都是在 MS Office 基准测试中停止。在此无法确定最终结果。
在 CrossMark 中，非骁龙竞争对手在仿真版本中至少领先 50%。如果我们在原生版本中运行相同的 CrossMark 测试，那么与配备 Ryzen 7 8840HS 的联想 Yoga 7 或配备 Core Ultra 7 258V 的华硕 ExpertBook 的差距将降至 13%。
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1154 - 1463, n=4) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1100 - 1284, n=4) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1267 - 1630, n=4) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1067 - 1563, n=4) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (129.9 - 407, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (130.3 - 283, n=4) | |
| Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (468 - 1145, n=4) | |
| Average of class Office (404 - 1966, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
* ... smaller is better
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (61258 - 62430, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (123557 - 127282, n=4) | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (46128 - 47845, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
DPC 延迟
我们常用的测试工具 LatencyMon 无法在 ARM 上运行。至少我们能够运行 YouTube 测试。播放 4K/60 fps 视频时没有出现任何掉帧现象，但在播放过程中，Snapdragon 的 iGPU 发挥了超过 80% 的性能。
大容量存储器
宏碁安装了美光的 512 GB NVMe 固态硬盘。在我们的 固态硬盘最佳列表中，该固态硬盘在 Swift Go 14 中的表现非常出色，与竞争对手相比有过之而无不及。连续写入和读取速度介于 3500 到 4000 MB/s 之间。在耐久性测试中，该固态硬盘仅在耐久性测试快结束时出现了短暂的性能下降。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
高通公司 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS-版本的缓存相对较小且速度较慢，与配置更好的 3.8 TFLOPS 和 4.6 TFLOPS 版本形成对比 X1-85iGPU 相反。因此，它是速度较慢的 iGPU 之一，而且由于高通公司的驱动程序尚未在所有方面进行全面优化，其性能也因应用程序的不同而有很大差异。
即使在合成 3DMark 基准测试中，它也明显落后于竞争对手的 AMD 和英特尔 iGPU；仅前代产品的速度就比它快两倍多，这一结果令人失望！在电池模式下，Fire Strike ，性能没有进一步下降。
游戏条件同样薄弱。因此，新款宏碁 Swift Go 14 AI 只在非常有限的范围内适用于游戏。这也是因为某些游戏（如X-Plane 11.11）会崩溃。甚至 Witcher 3都无法在我们的系统上运行，《博德之门 3》也是如此。
如果你看一下我们的能耗测量结果，就会发现 3D 应用程序的能耗明显低于重 CPU 应用程序。赛博朋克 2077》的功耗仅为 25 到 30 瓦，而在 Cinebench CPU 测试中，功耗可轻松升至 60 瓦。这表明，较小的 Snapdragon 并不是为高性能 3D 应用而设计的。
尽管采用了 iGPU，但竞争对手至少可以以较低的分辨率和细节来玩当前的游戏，而 Go 14 却不是这样。因此，GPU 主要适用于视频播放、视频编码和解码等。游戏只能使用较老和要求较低的游戏（如《DOTA 2 Reborn》）。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4444 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 17699 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3634 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 981 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X -1! | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 -1! | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Office (6.65 - 26.4, n=22, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Office (3.35 - 47.8, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Office (3.86 - 35.7, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Average of class Office (9.6 - 56.5, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 91.5 | 84.2 | 32.8 | 14 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 83.4 | 65.8 | 55.7 | 48.1 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 36.9 | 15.2 | 9.81 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 36 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 85.5 | 29.6 | 22.5 | 19.3 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 13.5 | 11.2 | 9.7 | 9.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 14.7 | 11.2 | 9.6 | 8.26 |
排放与能源 - 相对安静、经济、凉爽
噪音排放
Swift Go 14 的风扇在空闲模式下始终保持关闭状态，与性能模式无关。在游戏过程中，我们在性能模式下测得的数值也低于 30 分贝，这证实了我们在 3D 应用程序中的低能耗测量结果。只有在压力测试或 CPU 高负荷应用时，声音才会稍大一些，最高可达 39 分贝。
不过，由于 Swift 不会用于高性能工作负载，因此在日常使用中背景噪音非常小。尽管性能不错，但体积稍小的 MacBook Air 采用被动式静音散热系统，当然要比其他竞争对手好得多。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
| Load |
| / 39.14 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Micron 2550 MTFDKBA512TGE | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | 1% | -11% | -13% | |
| off / environment * | 23 | 24.1 -5% | 24 -4% | 25 -9% | 24.5 -7% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23 | 24.1 -5% | 24 -4% | 25 -9% | 24.7 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 23 | 24.1 -5% | 24 -4% | 25 -9% | 24.7 -7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23 | 24.1 -5% | 26.3 -14% | 26.2 -14% | 24.7 -7% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 28.13 | 31.7 -13% | 27.2 3% | 40.1 -43% | |
| Load Maximum * | 39.14 | 31.2 20% | 27.2 31% | 45.5 -16% | 42.4 -8% |
| Load Average * | 31.2 | 27.2 | 35.7 | 42.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
游戏时，笔记本电脑即使在热点也不会达到 40 °C。但在压力测试中，我们测得从下往上看显示屏中央和右侧区域的底部最高温度为 45 °C。总体而言，从上方看，设备左侧发热较多，但即使在按键上也不会出现令人不适的温度。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-1.4 °C / -2.5 F).
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -3% | -14% | -13% | -4% | 2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 39 | 41.6 -7% | 47.9 -23% | 36.5 6% | 38.8 1% | 44.3 -14% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 45 | 43.2 4% | 51.3 -14% | 49.5 -10% | 43 4% | 43.4 4% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 24 | 25.7 -7% | 26.7 -11% | 25.5 -6% | 26.4 -10% | 22.3 7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25 | 25.3 -1% | 26.9 -8% | 35 -40% | 27.2 -9% | 22.1 12% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
频率响应显示出线性的中高音和较低的低音。不过，后者并不像其他机型那样岌岌可危，Swift 的立体声扬声器对于笔记本电脑扬声器来说听起来相当不错。3.5 毫米插孔输出可用于连接外部设备。
Acer Swift Go 14 AI audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
尤其是空闲时的耗电量非常低。如果我们激活最佳能效并将屏幕亮度降至最低，耗电量可降至 3.7 W。
在负载情况下，我们测得游戏时的功耗约为 25 W，压力测试时的平均功耗为 46.8 W。小型 USB-C 电源的设计功率为 65 W，应始终能为笔记本电脑提供足够的电力。
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.36 Watt |
| Idle | 3.7 / 6.5 / 7.8 Watt |
| Load |
/ 67.04 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Micron 2550 MTFDKBA512TGE, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 14" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, , OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, , IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -30% | -17% | -51% | -33% | 12% | 6% | -11% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.7 | 3.9 -5% | 5.4 -46% | 5.5 -49% | 4.1 -11% | 1.95 47% | 4 ? -8% | 4.47 ? -21% |
| Idle Average * | 6.5 | 8.9 -37% | 9.7 -49% | 10.1 -55% | 6.8 -5% | 8.7 -34% | 5.9 ? 9% | 7.41 ? -14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.8 | 9.6 -23% | 10.2 -31% | 11.2 -44% | 7.4 5% | 8.9 -14% | 6.97 ? 11% | 9.04 ? -16% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 25.4 | 42.8 -69% | 24.7 3% | 53.4 -110% | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 28.5 | 41.8 -47% | 22 23% | 50.4 -77% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 67.04 | 64.1 4% | 68.2 -2% | 104.1 -55% | 66.6 1% | 35.4 47% | 60.6 ? 10% | 61.8 ? 8% |
| Load Average * | 43.4 | 28.9 | 45.9 | 50.4 | 34.3 | 15 ? | 42.6 ? | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 60.9 | 28.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Power consumption with the external monitor
电池寿命
现在让我们来看看 Swift Go 14 的绝对优势，因为这款骁龙笔记本电脑终于在电池续航时间方面大显身手：在视频测试中，这款笔记本电脑的续航时间超过了 24 小时！当我们第二天早上想继续测试 Swift 时，却发现视频循环从前一天晚上就一直在运行，直到第二天晚上才终于停止，这让我们大吃一惊--太棒了！
我们还在 WiFi 测试中测得了出色的 21 小时运行时间，亮度降低到 150 尼特。
这一方面得益于 Snapdragon 良好的省电机制，另一方面也得益于 75 Wh 的大容量电池；竞争对手安装的大多是更小的型号。
| Acer Swift Go 14 AI SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 75 Wh | Asus ExpertBook P5 P5405-NZ0102X Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 63 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 55.9 Wh | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 65 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 71 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 5% | -41% | -53% | -37% | -9% | -38% | |
| H.264 | 1501 | 827 -45% | 1044 -30% | 716 ? -52% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 1313 | 973 -26% | 539 -59% | 479 -64% | 821 -37% | 914 -30% | 608 ? -54% |
| Load | 128 | 173 35% | 103 -20% | 74 -42% | 171 34% | 117.4 ? -8% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
配备骁龙处理器的新款宏碁 Aspire Go 14 将找到自己的目标群体，因为它拥有几乎令人难以置信的电池续航时间。不过，它牺牲了很多（3D）性能和兼容性。
Acer Swift Go 14 AI
- 12/03/2024 v8
Christian Hintze
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
