Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar
宏碁 Swift 14 AI 评测：首款配备 Arc Graphics 130V 的笔记本电脑
由于月牙湖的存在，运行时间更长。
宏碁的 Swift 14 AI 是一款小巧轻便的多媒体笔记本电脑，采用了英特尔全新且相当高效的 Lunar Lake 架构。我们尚未测试的 Arc Graphics 130V iGPU 不得不在基准测试中与 140V 及其前代产品竞争。Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
判决
14 英寸笔记本电脑在便携性、性能和大小适中的屏幕之间取得了良好的平衡，因此目前风靡全球。宏碁的 Swift 14 AI 也不例外，因为它安装的酷睿 5 226V 在保持相对低功耗的同时，还能提供相当大的功率。因此，它的运行时间可以被归类为 14 英寸设备的亮点之一，尽管一些竞争对手也拥有同样出色的标准。即便如此，在降低亮度的情况下，使用 WLAN 上网约 12.5 小时也是不错的成绩。此外，我们对其时尚的外壳也几乎没有什么可批评的，因为它很稳定，便于携带，并配备了良好的输入设备。如果你能接受读卡器的缺失，那么它的连接选项就足够了。例如，Swift 14 配备了两个 USB-4 端口，支持 DisplayPort 和 Thunderbolt 功能。
与往常一样，人们对其 OLED 显示屏众说纷纭。有些人赞美其对比度丰富的显示效果，有些人则会对屏幕的反光表面和潜在的闪烁感到恼火。此外，你还会批评它的扬声器和无法扩展的内存，因为这限制了笔记本电脑的未来性。总而言之，Swift 14 还是获得了 "良好 "的总体评价。竞争对手包括基于流星湖技术的旧设备或配备 AMD iGPU（如 Radeon 780M）的笔记本电脑。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
我们这款宏碁 Swift 14 AI 的售价为 1,199.99 美元，但在撰写本文时，在美国还不能在线订购。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Geizhals | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 83.5%  | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
2. 88.1%  | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Listenpreis 1999€ | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
3. 86.6%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H ⎘ Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
4. 88.5%  | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Listenpreis 1300 EUR | 1.6 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.50" 3072x1920 250 PPI IPS |
5. 88%  | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Listenpreis 1030 USD | 1.5 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" 2240x1400 189 PPI IPS |
如前所述，我们的测试机型配备了 Core Ultra 5 226V 和 16GB 集成 LPDDR5X-8533 内存。宏碁只安装了一个 512GB 的固态硬盘作为笔记本电脑的大容量存储器，这对于超过 1000 美元的价位来说，并不完全与时俱进（我们现在期望的是 1 TB 以上）。它采用闪亮的 90-Hz OLED 面板，支持 HDR，分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800 像素--对于一款 14 英寸设备来说，这已经很不错了。Windows 11 Home 作为其操作系统，为整套配置锦上添花。
规格
案例
Swift 14 有两种配色，即钢灰和蒸汽蓝，其中蒸汽蓝还显得比较灰暗。在质量方面，宏碁的这款产品绝对可以与竞争对手媲美。其制造质量和材料完全符合其价格。此外，它还具有极高的稳定性。与大多数竞争对手的设备一样，它的外壳在受力时仅在中间区域有一点变形。它的开启角度值得称赞：180° 并不总是必然的。同时，笔记本电脑的铰链也做得不错。单手即可轻松打开，而且在设备下方产生震动时也不会过度晃动。
如果你经常外出，那么你会对它适中的重量（1.26 千克）感到满意。虽然市场上有一些更轻巧的 14 英寸笔记本电脑，但 Swift 14 是同类产品中较轻的代表之一。其约 1.6 厘米的机身高度也体现了这一点。
连接性
端口
宏碁为这款 14 英寸笔记本电脑配备了两个 USB-C Type-4.0 端口和两个经典的 USB-A 3.0 端口。用户还可以使用一个 HDMI 2.1 输出端口和一个组合音响端口。由于所有端口都位于侧板背面，因此可以无限制地使用鼠标。
交流
Swift 14 配备了最先进的 Wi-Fi 7 芯片，即 Killer BE1750i。在距离参考路由器一米远的 Wi-Fi 测试中，该模块表现出色，仅在传输时被华硕 ZenBook S 14 击败。
网络摄像头
与大多数制造商不同的是，宏碁没有采用高清或全高清网络摄像头，而是采用了 QHD 高清摄像头。因此，它的图像清晰度略高，但并不完全令人满意--其色彩保真度仅为平均水平。附加功能：Swift 14 有一个机械盖。
配件
笔记本电脑随附几本信息手册和一个重 300 克（含电缆）的 65 瓦电源装置（USB-C）。
维护
即使拧松了 10 颗 Torx 螺丝，机箱底部仍然非常紧，必须使用很大的力气或合适的杠杆工具才能接触到笔记本的内部结构。除了 WLAN 芯片、M.2 固态硬盘和电池外，Swift 14 上没有太多可以更换的部件。
可持续性
宏碁主要使用硬纸板包装笔记本电脑。设备装在一个布袋里，电源装置装在一个塑料套里（每种情况下都标明了材料）。
保修
该设备在美国享有 12 个月的标准保修期。
输入设备
键盘
对于大多数买家来说，键盘已经足够了。虽然在键盘上打字的感觉并不是最好的，但它没有任何重大失误或弱点。如果有的话，宏碁还可以改进其布局（电源按钮没有单独放置）或中间的方向箭头。白色背光有两种亮度设置。
触摸板
一个相当平滑的点击板可代替鼠标，12.6 x 7.8 厘米的尺寸对于 14 英寸设备来说相对较大。支持的多点触控手势操作没有任何问题。在精确度方面，我们也没有发现异常。宏碁可以改进其点击行为，因为缺乏清晰的反馈，尤其是在左下角。
显示屏
说到 Swift 14，OLED 粉丝们绝对物有所值。14 英寸屏幕的平均亮度略低于 500 cd/m²，在对比设备中名列前茅（竞争对手的亮度往往接近 400 cd/m²）。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 500 cd/m²
Contrast: 50000:1 (Black: 0.01 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.55 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.55
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.94
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Samsung ATNA40YK11-0 (SDC4181), OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 ATNA40CU09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 LENOVO LEN140WUXGA (LEN88AC), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Lenovo LEN145-3K (LEN8AAF), IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5", 120 Hz | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 BOE0C9E, IPS, 2240x1400, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -0% | -4% | -21% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99 -1% | 99.9 0% | 98.4 -2% | 67.1 -33% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.6 | 89.2 -9% | 96.7 -1% | 86.9 -11% | 68.9 -29% |
| Response Times | 241% | 62% | -2932% | -3894% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.8 ? | 0.7 ? 12% | 1.3 ? -63% | 34.1 ? -4163% | 35.9 ? -4388% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 0.8 ? | 0.71 ? 11% | 1.2 ? -50% | 14.4 ? -1700% | 28 ? -3400% |
| PWM Frequency | 60 ? | 480 ? 700% | 240 300% | ||
| Screen | 23% | -8% | -373% | -293% | |
| Brightness middle | 500 | 374 -25% | 392 -22% | 464 -7% | 359.5 -28% |
| Brightness | 499 | 379 -24% | 388 -22% | 456 -9% | 361 -28% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 98 1% | 97 0% | 90 -7% | 92 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.01 | 0.02 -100% | 0.36 -3500% | 0.27 -2600% | |
| Contrast | 50000 | 19600 -61% | 1289 -97% | 1331 -97% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.55 | 1 72% | 1.75 51% | 0.9 75% | 1.64 54% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.38 | 2.2 66% | 4.46 30% | 2.32 64% | 4.68 27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.55 | 1.59 38% | 0.35 86% | 0.97 62% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 1.1 50% | 1.8 18% | 1.4 36% | 2.6 -18% |
| Gamma | 1.94 113% | 2.15 102% | 2.249 98% | 2.218 99% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6405 101% | 6549 99% | 6574 99% | 6669 97% | 6388 102% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 87% /
71% | 18% /
8% | -1103% /
-660% | -1403% /
-749% |
* ... smaller is better
由于屏幕表面的高反射性，这些值在较明亮的房间（如阳光房）和室外是绝对必要的。如果您经常在室外工作，最好选择哑光显示屏的设备。
由于屏幕在亮度低于 78% 时会闪烁（视亮度而定，频率为 60 至 360 Hz），敏感人群也可能会遇到一些问题。
除此之外，90 Hz 屏幕也没有受到任何批评。除了一流的黑色水平带来出色的对比度值之外，该显示器的可视角度和响应时间也同样令人印象深刻。它的色彩空间覆盖范围也明显优于一般的 IPS 面板，因为 DCI-P3 和 AdobeRGB 几乎完全覆盖。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz |  | |
| ≤ 78 cd/m² brightness | |||
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 78 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
Swift 14 的性能处于中下水平。16 GB 内存对某些用户来说可能已经是极限了，因此值得购买更贵的 32 GB 内存机型，它还拥有更快的 CPU 和 iGPU（Core Ultra 7 258V 配 Arc Graphics 140V），以及两倍大的固态硬盘（1 TB 而不是 512 GB）。附加费约为 270 美元。
测试条件
在清晰、直观、结构合理的 AcerSense 制造商工具中，您可以在三种操作模式（即安静、正常和高性能）之间进行切换。不过，与其他设备相比，配置文件（速度、音量等）之间的差异有限。我们的测量都是使用标准的 "正常 "设置进行的。
| 赛博朋克 2077（FHD/超高清） | 安静 | 正常 | 性能 |
| 噪音 | 37 dB(A) | 40 dB(A) | 43 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 17 帧/秒 | 19 帧/秒 | 20 帧/秒 |
处理器
核心 Core Ultra 5 226V和 酷睿至尊 7 258V这两款处理器在 CPU 方面的差别并不像型号名称乍一看那样大。这两款处理器都有 8 个内核，由于英特尔在 Lunar Lake 取消了超线程技术，因此 "只有 "8 个线程。其 TDP 最大为 37 瓦，制造工艺为 3 纳米。226V 必须在三级缓存（8 MB 对 12 MB）和时钟频率（2.1-4.5 GHz 对 2.2-4.8 GHz）方面做出让步。
如果将 CPU 性能与 ZenBook S 14相比，Swift 14 的表现相当出色（或者说华硕笔记本电脑的表现相当糟糕）。在 Cinebench 循环测试中，宏碁设备甚至略胜一筹，这要归功于它更稳定的长期性能。不过，226V 在与老式流星湖芯片的较量中毫无胜算 酷睿至尊 5 125H和 酷睿至尊 7 155H.不过，后者的 TDP 也更高。AMD 的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375的能耗也更高，与 AMD 的差距更大（参见评级表）。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V () | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V () | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V () | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V () | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V () | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V () | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V () | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V () | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V () | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 53954, n=56, last 2 years) | |
系统性能
从纸面上看，Ultra 5 226V 的系统性能非常稳定。PCMark 10 中超过 6400 分的成绩无疑令人印象深刻。但在实际使用中，系统在某些地方并不像你所期望的那样流畅。我们已经在其他配备 Lunar Lake 芯片的笔记本电脑上体验过这种感觉。英特尔可能需要在驱动程序和 BIOS 优化方面提供帮助。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V () | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V () | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V (249 - 249, n=2) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V (543 - 543, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6445 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V () | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V () | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 112837, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 226V () | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
Swift 14 AI 的延迟也不太理想。LatencyMon 工具证明，这款 14 英寸设备开箱后可能难以实时处理音频和视频。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
说到笔记本电脑的大容量存储设备，有好有坏。美光公司生产的 512 GB SSD（型号 2550）读取速度相当不错，但写入性能还有待提高。至少在较长时间内数值是稳定的，我们的 DiskSpd 循环证明了这一点，但这并不能代表所有的竞争对手（联想 Slim 5）。联想超薄 5).没有第二个 M.2 插槽有点遗憾。如果有了第二个 M.2 插槽，扩展存储空间就容易多了。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
弧形图形 Arc Graphics 130VUltra 5 226V 中安装的 iGPU 与 Arc Graphics 140V 相比，必须接受一些小的缩减。 Arc Graphics 140V.130V 只有 7 个 Xe² 内核，而不是 8 个，最高时钟频率为 1,850 MHz，而不是 2,050 MHz。遗憾的是，Swift 14 的 GPU 性能与前代芯片相比并不突出。无论是 Arc 7和 Arc 8在竞争对手的设备上都更快。AMD 当前的顶级 iGPU，即 Radeon 890M也再次领先。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 35970 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 41881 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9964 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 166711 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29655 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7529 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3532 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在实际游戏测试过程中，情况也差不多，Arc 130V 至少略微优于 Arc 7。一般来说，iGPU 的速度足以正常运行较老或要求不高的游戏，至少在全高清状态下是如此。不过，130V 在运行当前或对图形要求较高的游戏时很快就会力不从心。无论如何，在运行大多数游戏时，2,880 x 1,800 的屏幕原始分辨率在帧速率方面是无法达到的。
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 -1! | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (12.1 - 31.1, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (20.7 - 97.1, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 141.9 | 120 | 44.2 | 21.1 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 94.2 | 85 | 76.8 | 72.6 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 73.4 | 38.1 | 28.3 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 38.4 | 31 | 27.1 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 73 | 41 | 37 | 33 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 176.4 | 70.7 | 58.3 | 48.2 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 29.9 | 24.7 | 20.3 | 18.6 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 33.6 | 26.2 | 23.5 | 23.1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 (2023) | 50.7 | 47.1 | 28.3 | 21.4 |
| Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 33 | 32 | 29 | |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 99.8 | 55.5 | 31 | 25.4 |
| Lords of the Fallen (2023) | 17.1 | 16.1 | 14.3 | 11.4 |
| Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 15.1 | 12.6 | 11.2 | |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 12 | 11 | 8.7 | 7.1 |
| The Finals (2023) | 79.6 | 62.9 | 55.3 | 44.8 |
| Ready or Not (2023) | 52.5 | 40.8 | 26.5 | 19.9 |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 162.6 | 103.8 | 101.5 | |
| Helldivers 2 (2024) | 33.4 | 25.6 | 23.5 | 22 |
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 25.5 | 22.1 | 16.3 | 15.1 |
| Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) | 17.6 | 13.1 | ||
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 22.5 | 20.8 | 17.8 | 13.6 |
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 13.2 | 11.7 | 9.12 | |
| F1 24 (2024) | 66 | 56 | 41 | 12 |
| Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 8.56 | 7.3 | ||
| Space Marine 2 (2024) | 16.4 | 15 | 14.7 | 13.2 |
| Final Fantasy XVI (2024) | 14.7 | 13.6 | 11.7 | 11.5 |
| God of War Ragnarök (2024) | 18.7 | 18.5 | 16.2 | 15.7 |
| Until Dawn (2024) | 27.6 | 18.6 | 12.3 | 9.68 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (17.8 - 55.2, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Arc Graphics 130V () | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13.8 - 43.7, n=32, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Arc Graphics 130V () | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 36.6, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average Intel Arc Graphics 130V () | |
我们测试了 GPU 在较长时间内的性能表现。 赛博朋克 2077(全高清/超高清）。Swift 14 出现了一些波动，但没有急剧下降（见图）。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
排放量
噪音排放
虽然 Swift 14 比同类产品 ZenBook S 14 厚，但宏碁笔记本电脑在空闲模式和负载状态下的声音都更明显。在 3D 应用程序中，"正常 "模式会产生 40 到 41 dB(A)的噪音，虽然不是特别大，但考虑到其性能，也不算低。在空闲阶段，机箱风扇会部分关闭，但在上网和播放电影等相当简单的任务时，风扇往往会在某些地方启动--许多其他笔记本电脑都会这样做--这可能会让某些用户感到厌烦。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 26 / 29 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40 / 41 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Radeon 890M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 14% | -4% | 2% | 5% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 23.7 5% | 24 4% | 24 4% | 23.8 5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 23.7 5% | 25 -0% | 25 -0% | 24.9 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 26 | 23.7 9% | 26 -0% | 27 -4% | 24.9 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29 | 23.7 18% | 31 -7% | 30 -3% | 24.9 14% |
| Load Average * | 40 | 30.5 24% | 43 -8% | 36 10% | 32.9 18% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 40 | 31.1 22% | 40.9 -2% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 41 | 33.6 18% | 45 -10% | 38 7% | 43 -5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40 | 38 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
事实证明，宏碁笔记本电脑的温度变化并不明显。顶部最高温度为 41 °C，机箱背面最高温度为 45 °C，这是此类设备在负载情况下的典型温度。在闲置模式下，机箱温度通常保持在非常舒适的区域（低于 30 °C）。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Radeon 890M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | -2% | 3% | -8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41 | 43.7 -7% | 43 -5% | 43 -5% | 40.4 1% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 45 | 46.9 -4% | 48 -7% | 42 7% | 43.6 3% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26 | 25.8 1% | 26 -0% | 25 4% | 31 -19% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28 | 26.3 6% | 27 4% | 26 7% | 32.2 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在《赛博朋克 2077》或《Furmark》和《Prime95》的压力测试中，酷睿至尊 5 226V 的发热温度约为 60 °C，结果非常适中。虽然在赛博朋克中没有出现节流现象，但在满载情况下，处理器的节流低于其基本值。不过，许多笔记本电脑都会出现后一种情况。
发言人
我们对它的音质感到有些失望，因为它在这方面还有很大的潜力。虽然 84 dB(A) 的最大音量相当不错，但根据我们的音频分析，中音尤其是低音的还原并不特别干净有力。
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
耗电量
Lunar Lake 架构的决定性优势之一是能耗适中。空闲模式下的能耗为 5 到 10 瓦，负载模式下的能耗为 36 到 60 瓦，这在很大程度上超过了旧式的 Meteor Lake 芯片。
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.9 Watt |
| Idle | 5 / 6 / 10 Watt |
| Load |
36 / 60 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Radeon 890M | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 9% | -31% | -28% | -20% | -11% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5 | 5.1 -2% | 5 -0% | 4 20% | 2.7 46% | 4.49 ? 10% |
| Idle Average * | 6 | 6.2 -3% | 8 -33% | 5.5 8% | 5.4 10% | 7.66 ? -28% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10 | 6.9 31% | 16 -60% | 11.8 -18% | 5.5 45% | 9.56 ? 4% |
| Load Average * | 36 | 38.7 -8% | 53 -47% | 66 -83% | 67.4 -87% | 46.6 ? -29% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 41.6 | 33.1 20% | 67.9 -63% | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 38.2 | 28.6 25% | 67.8 -77% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 60 | 60 -0% | 70 -17% | 100 -67% | 68.3 -14% | 68.6 ? -14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.7 | 55 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
因此，Swift 14 的电池续航时间非常出色也就不足为奇了。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中（通过脚本访问各种网站），亮度降低到 150 cd/m²，65 Wh 电池的续航时间不到 12.5 小时。在我们的对比范围内，只有 ZenBook S 14（72 Wh）的电池续航时间超过了这一数值。
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 65 Wh | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 72 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, 57 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 73 Wh | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Radeon 890M, 68 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 14% | -28% | -10% | -12% | -6% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 753 | 858 14% | 544 -28% | 680 -10% | 661 -12% | 710 ? -6% |
| H.264 | 1199 | 896 ? | ||||
| Load | 157 | 88 | 116.6 ? | |||
| Reader / Idle | 2196 | 1750 ? |
Notebookcheck total rating
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU
-
10/29/2024 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
