ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 笔记本电脑评测:联想对戴尔 XPS 13 的回应
ThinkPad Z13 G2 是去年 ThinkPad Z13 G1 的升级版,配备了更新的 Zen 4 CPU。在其他方面,它们的机身外观完全相同,显示屏选项也大同小异。我们建议您查看我们对 ThinkPad Z13 G1因为我们对该系统的大部分评论仍然适用于 ThinkPad Z13 G2。
我们的评测机是一款高端配置,配备 Ryzen 7 Pro 7840U CPU、1800p 60 Hz OLED 触摸屏和 32 GB 内存,售价约 1800 美元。其他配置包括 Ryzen 5 Pro 7540U、1200p IPS 显示屏、16 GB 内存和可选 WWAN。
ThinkPad Z13 G2 与其他以商务为中心的 13 英寸子笔记本竞争,如 惠普蜻蜓 G4, 戴尔Latitude 13 7340, XPS 13, 东芝 Portege 系列或 微星Summit系列.
更多联想评测:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.5 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 13.99 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 | |
91.9 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.1 kg | 16.3 mm | 13.50" | 1920x1280 | |
90.2 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.1 kg | 18.2 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1200 | |
90.5 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW R5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M | 1.2 kg | 13.99 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1200 | |
89.5 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 989 g | 14.8 mm | 13.00" | 2160x1350 | |
87.5 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.3 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
交流
我们的 2 代机型配备了联发科 Wi-Fi 6E MT7922,而不是去年 1 代机型上的高通 WCN685x。由于联发科模块同时支持 Wi-Fi 6 和 6E 连接,因此在其他方面没有明显区别。
网络摄像头
虽然联想机型配备了 200 万像素的网络摄像头,但 Windows 摄像头应用程序只能选择最大 0.5 万像素,如右侧截图所示。我们在最近的 惠普Pavilion Plus 14同样采用 AMD Zen 4 CPU。
维护
第 1 代和第 2 代机型的内部差异不大。
保修
如果在美国购买,根据配置不同,基本保修期可以是 12 个月或 36 个月,而戴尔等竞争厂商的其他高端商务笔记本电脑的标准保修期往往是 36 个月。
显示屏
ThinkPad Z13 G2 上的三星 ATNA33AA02-0 1800p OLED 触摸屏与原来的 ThinkPad Z13 G1.该面板涵盖 DCI-P3 和 HDR400,色彩比其他子笔记本上的大多数 IPS 面板更丰富,但遗憾的是,今年的 Z13 G2 型号没有新的显示屏可供选择。在 90 Hz 或 120 Hz 的选择越来越普遍的情况下,60 Hz 的刷新率已经开始显得过时。
最大亮度为标准的 400 尼特。惠普仍然是仅有的几家在 14 英寸 EliteBook 840 系列等许多同类子笔记本上提供亮度更高的 1000 尼特面板的主要制造商之一。 EliteBook 840 系列.如果户外能见度是一个问题,那么像 精英蜻蜓可以作为 ThinkPad Z13 的合理替代品。
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 372 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 ATNA33AA02-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | HP Dragonfly G4 Chi Mei CMN13C0, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U Chi Mei 133JCG, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW NV133WUM-N63, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 MND007ZA1-3, IPS, 2160x1350, 13" | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -20% | -22% | -21% | -20% | -20% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.7 | 68.4 -31% | 65.9 -34% | 67.7 -32% | 68.5 -31% | 69 -31% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98.3 -2% | 96.8 -3% | 96.5 -3% | 99.5 0% | 99.1 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.3 | 70.4 -28% | 67.8 -30% | 69.7 -28% | 69.7 -28% | 71.1 -27% |
Response Times | -1774% | -1775% | -1589% | -1437% | -1816% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.1 ? | 48.8 ? -2224% | 51 ? -2329% | 49 ? -2233% | 39.9 ? -1800% | 50.4 ? -2300% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2.2 ? | 31.3 ? -1323% | 29.04 ? -1220% | 23 ? -945% | 25.8 ? -1073% | 31.5 ? -1332% |
PWM Frequency | 60.1 ? | |||||
Screen | -39% | -107% | -32% | -22% | -46% | |
Brightness middle | 372 | 408.8 10% | 471 27% | 418 12% | 461.2 24% | 436 17% |
Brightness | 375 | 399 6% | 437 17% | 379 1% | 428 14% | 416 11% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 90 -9% | 87 -12% | 81 -18% | 86 -13% | 89 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.2033 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.36 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.88 | 2.02 -130% | 3.24 -268% | 1.7 -93% | 1.79 -103% | 1.81 -106% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.22 | 3.84 -19% | 7.19 -123% | 3.3 -2% | 3.3 -2% | 4.73 -47% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 2.3 -92% | 4.6 -283% | 2.3 -92% | 1.8 -50% | 2.9 -142% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.2 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.27 97% | |
CCT | 6326 103% | 6203 105% | 6520 100% | 6499 100% | 6588 99% | 6784 96% |
Contrast | 1278 | 2317 | 1267 | 1590 | 1211 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.61 | 1.08 | 1.1 | 0.47 | 0.45 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -611% /
-349% | -635% /
-387% | -547% /
-312% | -493% /
-278% | -627% /
-361% |
* ... smaller is better
显示器开箱后校准良好,平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别仅为 1.2 和 0.88。不过,尽管 OLED 面板支持完整的 DCI-P3 色彩,但默认色彩设置为 sRGB。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60.1 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 60.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 60.1 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
与大多数其他 OLED 面板一样,脉宽调制或闪烁出现在所有亮度级别上。从 0 到 52% 亮度的频率稳定在 238.6 Hz,然后从 53% 到 100% 亮度的频率变为 60 Hz。
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。预装的联想商用贵族软件不包括单独的电源配置文件选项,以简化设置数量。
处理器
迄今为止,移动 Zen 4 CPU 给人留下了非常深刻的印象,而八核 Ryzen 7 Pro 7840U也不例外。AMD CPU 的速度甚至超过了任何同类英特尔第 13 代酷睿-U 或酷睿-P 处理器,甚至包括 酷睿 i7-1370P.它的性能还超过了罕见的 Ryzen 7 Pro 6860Z在单线程和多线程负载下,它还比去年 ThinkPad Z13 G1 上罕见的 Ryzen 7 Pro 6860Z 快 15% 到 20%。
尽管外形尺寸只有 13 英寸,但性能的可持续性同样出色。在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,分数从头到尾保持一致,这表明在运行苛刻负载时时钟频率稳定。
降级到六核 Ryzen 5 Pro 7540U配置预计会对处理器性能产生 20% 至 30% 的影响。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (7596 - 12069, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G10 7L7U1ET |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (1896 - 2508, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G10 7L7U1ET |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (17604 - 23889, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (77578 - 100087, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (3611 - 4394, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (95020 - 110151, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (12250 - 14151, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (41143 - 53280, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (66300 - 142329, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (777 - 1004, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (9494 - 12540, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (33564 - 38442, n=5) | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW |
系统性能
PCMark 分数明显高于去年搭载 Ryzen 5 的 ThinkPad Z13 G1,尤其是在 GPU 性能最为重要的 "数字内容创建 "子测试中。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (6541 - 7012, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (10055 - 10934, n=5) | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (8921 - 9933, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (7806 - 8874, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1533 - 1669, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1461 - 1624, n=5) | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1697 - 1824, n=5) | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1049 - 1499, n=5) | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (259 - 317, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (234 - 245, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (523 - 571, n=5) | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7012 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (66487 - 67856, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (47725 - 50543, n=5) | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (89477 - 94965, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (128.6 - 138.9, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频内容时,LatencyMon 显示了 DPC 问题和掉帧问题。后者尤其令人失望,因为掉帧会以固定的时间间隔出现,这表明存在潜在的驱动程序问题。相比之下,大多数基于英特尔的笔记本电脑在运行相同测试时都不会出现掉帧现象。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配备了中端 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ4X164NPCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘。最大传输速率稳定在 4600 MB/s 左右,而更大的三星 PM9A1 系列则高达 7000 MB/s。即使在几分钟的压力下,硬盘也没有出现节流现象。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U -11! | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW | |
Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M与性能较差的 Radeon 660M 或 740M 相比,Radeon 780M 的性能大幅提升了 60% 至 70%。它可能不再是 最快的 iGPU 解决方案但在 2023 年底之前,它仍能击败任何替代方案。像《博德之门 3》(Baldur 'sGate 3)或《蒂娜的仙境》(Tiny Tina's Wonderlands)这样的热门或高要求游戏,在大多数设置为低的情况下,在 1080p 下都能发挥出色。
请注意,正如我们下面的 3DMark 11 结果表所示,平衡模式和性能模式之间的性能差异比预期的要大。在运行要求较高的任务时,您需要仔细检查是否开启了 "性能 "模式,以充分发挥 CPU 的性能。
电源配置文件 | 物理得分 | 图形得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 18262 | 12223 | 7186 |
均衡模式 | 13081 (-28%) | 8298 (-32%) | 5422 (-25%) |
电池电量 | 17161 (6-%) | 11257 (-8%) | 5254 (-27%) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 11977 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6615 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2850 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (53.6 - 80.6, n=21) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (32.5 - 52.1, n=40) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (16.3 - 37.5, n=36) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (13.8 - 29.6, n=37) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (11.5 - 26.3, n=32) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (30.7 - 67.4, n=16) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (20.2 - 43.9, n=24) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (15.7 - 36.8, n=26) | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (13.8 - 29.9, n=26) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (13.4 - 29.2, n=25) |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 116.7 | 45.8 | 28.6 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 113.7 | 96.7 | 83.1 | 72.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 69.8 | 35.3 | 26.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 43.1 | 33 | 27.1 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 69 | 37 | 34 | 34 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 141.9 | 61.2 | 50.4 | 43 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 64.7 | 47.1 | 31.5 | 25.2 |
F1 22 (2022) | 84.2 | 74.7 | 53.6 | 14.6 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 39.1 | 31.7 | 26.1 | 25.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 38 | 29.4 | 23.5 | 20.3 |
排放量
系统噪音
平衡和性能电源配置文件之间的风扇噪音差异很大。例如 Witcher 3例如,在平衡模式下运行时,风扇噪音仅为 37 dB(A),而在性能模式下则为 44.8 dB(A)。这与上文提到的两种电源配置文件之间超出预期的性能差异有关。此外,在运行浏览器或视频等非苛刻负载时,系统基本保持安静,噪音为 28.3 dB(A),背景噪音为 25.1 dB(A)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.8 / 25.8 / 28.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 28.3 / 44.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.1 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | HP Dragonfly G4 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW Radeon 660M, R5 PRO 6650U, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 12% | 2% | 7% | 10% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 25.1 | 23.3 7% | 25.02 -0% | 23.71 6% | 22.9 9% | 22.6 10% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.8 | 23.5 9% | 25.02 3% | 23.71 8% | 23 11% | 22.6 12% |
Idle Average * | 25.8 | 23.5 9% | 25.02 3% | 23.71 8% | 23 11% | 22.6 12% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.3 | 26.8 5% | 25.02 12% | 23.71 16% | 23 19% | 24.2 14% |
Load Average * | 28.3 | 27.2 4% | 35.07 -24% | 32.35 -14% | 32.8 -16% | 35.8 -27% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.8 | 32.7 27% | 38.8 13% | 36.9 18% | 46.5 -4% | |
Load Maximum * | 44.8 | 35 22% | 38.2 15% | 39.53 12% | 36.9 18% | 48.9 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于采用了紧凑型设计和金属机箱,在运行高负载时,表面温度会非常高。键盘中心和底部的热点温度分别可达 46 摄氏度和 48 摄氏度,而 HP Dragonfly G4 的温度仅为 39 摄氏度至 41 摄氏度。 惠普蜻蜓 G4相比,采用较慢的酷睿 i7-1365U 的惠普 Dragonfly G4 仅为 39 摄氏度至 41 摄氏度。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.1 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.2 °C / 84.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.9 °C / -1.7 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, AMD Radeon 660M | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -4% | 0% | -15% | -1% | -11% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 46.2 | 38.6 16% | 34.3 26% | 44.9 3% | 44 5% | 42 9% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48.4 | 40.4 17% | 37.6 22% | 44.3 8% | 43.2 11% | 47.4 2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 23.2 | 28.2 -22% | 28.4 -22% | 31.4 -35% | 25.6 -10% | 28.8 -24% |
Idle Bottom * | 23 | 29 -26% | 28.8 -25% | 31.5 -37% | 25.6 -11% | 29.6 -29% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当处于 Prime95 压力下时,CPU 会升至 4 GHz 和 51 W,然后迅速下降并稳定在 3.3 GHz、35 W 和 86 C。 蜻蜓 G4的核心温度稳定在 76 摄氏度。
如果同时在 Prime95 和 FurMark 下对 CPU 和 GPU 施加充分压力,就会出现严重的节流现象,如下面的截图所示。值得庆幸的是,在运行实际负载时不会出现这种情况。 Witcher 3例如,在 "Prime95 "和 "FurMark "模式下,时钟频率会更加稳定,性能结果也更加一致。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 29 |
Prime95 压力 | 3.2 | -- | 86 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 0.5 - 2.6 | 800 - 2100 | 62 - 84 |
Witcher 3 压力 | ~0.3 | 2228 | 76 |
发言人
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
功耗全面高于 ThinkPad Z13 G1 ThinkPad Z13 G1电池寿命较短。运行 Witcher 3为例,耗电量为 55 W,而去年的机型仅为 30 W。当然,与 Radeon 660M 相比,我们的 Radeon 780M 性能更高,这意味着更高的功耗水平不是白费的。
与 IPS 相比,仅 OLED 面板就需要消耗大量电能。仅在最大亮度设置和明亮的白色屏幕(如典型的网页)上空转就会消耗近 13 W,而 ThinkPad Z13 G1 IPS 配置的功耗不到一半。
当 CPU 使用率达到 100%时,我们可以测量到 65 W USB-C 交流适配器的最大功耗为 62 W(约 10.8 x 4.8 x 2.9 厘米)。因此,如果同时运行要求较高的负载,充电速度会减慢。更大的 100 瓦适配器可能更适合电源用户。
Off / Standby | 0.22 / 0.49 Watt |
Idle | 5.8 / 6.2 / 12.7 Watt |
Load |
27.2 / 61.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW R5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ, IPS, 2160x1350, 13" | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 6% | 9% | 16% | 12% | 2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.8 | 4.1 29% | 2.37 59% | 2.4 59% | 3.3 43% | 4 31% |
Idle Average * | 6.2 | 7.5 -21% | 6.19 -0% | 4.6 26% | 6.5 -5% | 6.5 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.7 | 8.2 35% | 14.1 -11% | 5.1 60% | 7.1 44% | 6.8 46% |
Load Average * | 27.2 | 35.5 -31% | 36.3 -33% | 53.1 -95% | 40.7 -50% | 48 -76% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.1 | 37.5 31% | 24.9 54% | 27.6 49% | 37 32% | 52.3 3% |
Load Maximum * | 61.4 | 66.5 -8% | 69.13 -13% | 63.7 -4% | 58.6 5% | 55.2 10% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
由于采用了分辨率更高的 OLED 面板,运行时间急剧下降。例如,我们的 ThinkPad Z13 G1 配备了基本的 1200p IPS 面板,可持续运行 14 小时以上,而 ThinkPad Z13 G2 仅有不到 8 小时。
从空电到满电的充电时间比预期的要慢,将近 2.5 个小时,而其他大多数笔记本电脑只需 1.5 个小时。
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, 51.5 Wh | HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh | Dell Latitude 13 7340 i5-1345U i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW R5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M, 51.5 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 49.5 Wh | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 61 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 103% | 92% | 84% | -1% | 55% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 469 | 954 103% | 901 92% | 863 84% | 465 -1% | 726 55% |
Reader / Idle | 2550 | |||||
Load | 192 | 176 | 113 | |||
H.264 | 979 |
Pros
Cons
结论--一切为了性能升级
主要区别 ThinkPad Z13 1 代和 Z13 Gen 2 的主要区别在于后者包含 AMD Zen 4 CPU 选项。如果不需要额外的性能,那么 Z13 Gen 1 可以提供基本相同的用户体验,因为它具有相同的显示屏选项和物理特性。去年的 Zen 3+ 处理器速度本来就不慢,因此较新的 Zen 4 处理器应该主要吸引的是高级用户和图形编辑人员,而不是轻量级浏览器或电子表格数据录入人员。
至于 OLED 面板,买家应该记住,在我们的 WLAN 测试中,与基本的 IPS 面板相比,OLED 面板会显著缩短电池使用时间,最长可达 6 小时。在这方面,其更深的色彩、更快的响应时间、HDR 支持和更密集的分辨率肯定会带来一些缺点。
AMD Zen 4 Pro CPU 的升级值得称赞,但 60 Hz 显示屏和 200 万像素网络摄像头开始让人感觉过时,尤其是对于高端子笔记本而言。
对于未来可能推出的 ThinkPad Z13 Gen 3,我们希望看到刷新率更高、背光更亮的最新显示屏,以便更好地与 华硕 Zenbook 系列或惠普 Dragonfly 系列的竞争,它们分别提供了 120 Hz 和 1000 nit 的显示屏。键盘按键和点击板的反馈更灵敏,也能说服传统的 ThinkPad 用户尝试 Z 系列。除此之外,金属机身仍然给人耳目一新的感觉,与 戴尔 XPS或惠普 Elite 的替代品相比,金属机身仍然给人耳目一新的感觉,具有很强的竞争力。
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2
- 01/20/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.