华硕 VivoBook 14X OLED K3405 笔记本电脑评测:配备酷睿 i5-13500H 和生动的 2.8K OLED 显示屏的轻薄型多媒体笔记本电脑
华硕今年推出了多款升级版 VivoBook。虽然新的 VivoBook 15X提供英特尔 Raptor Lake-P 和 AMD Ryzen 7030U Barcelo-R 两种选择,而新的 VivoBook Pro 16X则一路升级至 酷睿 i9-13980HX.现在,我们将目光转向配备 Raptor Lake-H45 CPU 的 VivoBook 14X。
VivoBook 14X 让我们首次看到了英特尔酷睿 i5-13500H的性能,以及英伟达GeForce RTX 3050 笔记本电脑 GPU.除了少数低端产品外,OLED 或多或少已成为 VivoBook 的主流。在这种情况下,VivoBook 14X 拥有一块 14 英寸 2.8K OLED 显示屏,刷新率为 90 Hz。
华硕还为这款笔记本配备了 16GB DDR4-3200 内存、Wi-Fi 6E 和 512GB NVMe SSD。该配置的价格为 96,990 ₹(1,172 美元)。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 18.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Acer Swift X SFX14-71G i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.50" | 2880x1800 | |
85.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.2 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
88.8 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
底盘轻巧而实用
与 VivoBook 15X 类似,华硕也为 VivoBook 14X 提供了两种颜色选择:酷银和独立黑(我们的版本)。与一般的 VivoBook 一样,1.4 千克的机身主要采用塑料结构,而金属盖子上则印有独特的 VivoBook 徽标。
打开显示屏盖子非常容易,只需一根手指,笔记本电脑就能保持稳定,不会滑动。显示屏可以 180° 角平放。显示屏和键盘面板有一些弯曲,但在正常使用时不会有问题。
铰链感觉很牢固,没有吱吱作响或过大的阻力。此外,华硕还提供抗菌保护,据称至少能在三年内抑制细菌滋生。华硕还声称该笔记本符合 MIL-STD-810H 耐用性标准。
连接性Wi-Fi 6E 性能不尽如人意
端口排列与我们之前在 VivoBook 15X 上看到的相似。左侧有一个 USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A 端口,其余的都在右侧。
这种单侧分布的端口可能会造成困扰,尤其是在使用外接鼠标和打算连接多个外设时。不过,端口之间的间距足够大,不会造成任何连接问题。
交流
使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器进行测试时,英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E AX211 显卡在 5 GHz 频段表现出色,没有明显的吞吐量下降。
但是,6 GHz 频段的表现却不尽如人意,在测试过程中经常出现吞吐量下降的情况。
相比之下 技嘉 Aero 14 OLED配备了英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E AX210 网卡,在两个频段都表现出色。
Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 (iperf 3.1.3) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF (iperf 3.1.3) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti (iperf 3.1.3) | |
Average of class Multimedia (358 - 1921, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 (iperf 3.1.3) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (64 - 1921, n=242) |
Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 (iperf 3.1.3) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF (iperf 3.1.3) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti (iperf 3.1.3) | |
Average of class Multimedia (709 - 1789, n=78, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 (iperf 3.1.3) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=242) |
Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF (iperf 3.1.3) | |
Average of class Multimedia (705 - 1816, n=36, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 (iperf 3.1.3) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (385 - 1851, n=214) |
Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF (iperf 3.1.3) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 (iperf 3.1.3) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=213) | |
Average of class Multimedia (700 - 1807, n=36, last 2 years) |
网络摄像头
VivoBook 14X 上集成的 720p 网络摄像头清晰度较差,色彩偏差较大。X-Rite ColorChecker Passport 测试显示,紫蓝色的 Delta E 最高,为 22.45。
虽然网络摄像头可以满足偶尔的视频通话需求,但华硕最好还是为笔记本配备一个 1080p 模块,以提高质量。
为增加私密性,还提供了一个物理网络摄像头快门。
安全
触摸板中嵌入的指纹扫描仪为生物识别登录提供了便利。此外,还配备了 TPM 2.0 模块。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了 90 W 电源适配器和常规文件外,没有其他附件。
在印度,华硕为 VivoBook 14X 提供一年标准保修。在 2023 年 8 月 31 日之前购买该笔记本电脑的用户还可享受Back to College 优惠服务。其中包括从 99 ₹ 到 2,999 ₹ 不等的多种延长保修和本地意外损坏保护选项。
维护
进入内部需要拧下背板上的七颗 PH0 螺钉。进入内部后,您可以轻松更换 WLAN 卡和 NVMe SSD。
值得注意的是,8 GB 内存焊接在主板上,这意味着你只能升级一个 SO-DIMM 插槽。如有必要,可以拧下并更换电池。
输入设备不错的键盘和触摸板
键盘
VivoBook 14X 配备了华硕所谓的 ErgoSense 键盘,键程为 1.4 毫米。由于采用了碟形键帽和间距适中的按键,在这款键盘上打字非常舒适。
顶排包含 F1-F12 键和特殊键,其主要功能可通过 MyAsus 应用程序进行配置。方向键可能会略显拥挤,但对于这种外形的笔记本电脑来说,这很正常。三段式背光在黑暗环境中也清晰可辨。
触摸板
VivoBook 14X 的触摸板尺寸为 7.5 厘米 x 13 厘米,为导航提供了充足的空间,并提供了流畅的滑动体验。
整个表面可用作鼠标左键,点击反应灵敏且相对安静。
显示屏:2.8K OLED,HDR 和 90 Hz PWM
VivoBook 14X 配备的 2880 x 1800 16:10 90 Hz 三星 OLED 面板具有良好的亮度分布和基本无限的对比度。
我们在 SDR 模式下测得的最大亮度为 373 尼特。该显示屏通过了 VESA DisplayHDR True Black 600 认证,我们在播放 HDR 内容时测得的亮度可达 571 尼特。由于这是一款 OLED 显示屏,因此不会出现背光出血现象。
MyAsus 应用程序提供了多种显示选项。我们使用出厂默认的 Normal(正常)模式和 Native(原生)色域进行了所有测试。
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 367 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.85 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.18
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 Samsung ATNA40YK07-1, , 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Swift X SFX14-71G ATNA45AF03-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5" | MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V B140QAN06.T, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Samsung SDC4192 (ATNA40YK14-0), OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 LEN89C1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti MNE007ZA1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -5% | -3% | -17% | -17% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 96.2 -4% | 99.8 0% | 72.9 -27% | 74.1 -26% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 99.6 0% | 100 0% | 98.2 -2% | 97.4 -3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.5 | 96.2 0% | 85.3 -12% | 88.7 -8% | 74.6 -23% | 75.3 -22% |
Response Times | 109% | -159% | 69% | -1350% | -1320% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.15 ? | 0.4 ? 65% | 5.5 ? -378% | 2.4 ? -109% | 31.8 ? -2665% | 31.5 ? -2639% |
Response Time Black / White * | 14.4 ? | 0.6 ? 96% | 5.8 ? 60% | 2.4 ? 83% | 19.3 ? -34% | 14.5 ? -1% |
PWM Frequency | 90.02 ? | 240 ? 167% | 300 233% | |||
Screen | 15% | 3% | 45% | -16% | -14% | |
Brightness middle | 369 | 388 5% | 419 14% | 423 15% | 344.7 -7% | 421 14% |
Brightness | 364 | 390 7% | 402 10% | 427 17% | 334 -8% | 416 14% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 98 15% | 89 5% | 98 15% | 92 8% | 89 5% |
Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.1 | 0.31 | 0.28 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.85 | 2.2 23% | 2.3 19% | 0.55 81% | 3.01 -6% | 3.2 -12% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.22 | 3.9 8% | 5.8 -37% | 1.15 73% | 6.3 -49% | 5.5 -30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.18 | 1.9 13% | 0.9 59% | 1.15 47% | 0.83 62% | 2 8% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 1.4 36% | 3.3 -50% | 0.69 69% | 4.6 -109% | 4.4 -100% |
Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.14 103% | 2.42 91% | 2.28 96% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6518 100% | 6380 102% | 6550 99% | 6479 100% | 6420 101% | 6384 102% |
Contrast | 974 | 4230 | 1112 | 1504 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 41% /
33% | -54% /
-26% | 37% /
40% | -461% /
-238% | -450% /
-233% |
* ... smaller is better
VivoBook 14X 对整个 sRGB 色彩空间(100%)的覆盖率令人印象深刻,对 Adobe RGB(96.5%)和 Display P3(99.9%)色域的覆盖率也接近完整,这将令内容创作者感到满意。
我们在 Display P3 色彩空间中进行了色彩校准。 VivoBook 14X 在开箱即用的灰度和 ColorChecker 中已经显示出较低的 Delta E 值。您也可以使用 ProArt Creator Hub 和兼容的 X-Rite i1Display 校准器来执行自己的校准。
使用 Portrait Displays 提供的 X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3 分光光度计和 Calman Ultimate 软件,我们可以在灰阶中显著降低 0.8 的 Delta E 值。不过,在 ColorChecker 数值方面仅有微弱的改善。
校准后的 ICC 文件可从上面的链接下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.8 ms rise | |
↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.15 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.57 ms rise | |
↘ 0.58 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
由于背景闪烁,需要手动测量来估算响应时间。从 100% 黑色过渡到 100% 白色需要 14.4 毫秒,这对于 OLED 面板来说略微偏高。不过,50% 灰色到 80% 灰色的转换则要快得多,仅需 1.15 毫秒。
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 90.02 Hz | ||
≤ 100 cd/m² brightness | |||
The display backlight flickers at 90.02 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 90.02 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. Flickering occurs at relatively low brightness settings, so extended use at this brightness setting or lower can cause eyestrain. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
面板在 75% 至 100% 亮度之间使用 90 Hz 直流调光。亮度低于 75%,面板会切换到约 360 Hz 的 PWM 频率。
与 PWM 闪烁相比,90 赫兹直流调光对眼睛的伤害相对较小。在相应的刷新率下,该频率会降至 60 赫兹。
我们建议将亮度设置在 50% 以上,以减少视觉疲劳。
如需了解更多信息,请查阅"为什么 PWM 如此令人头疼和"分析:直流调光与 PWM - 您能否对 AMOLED 显示器进行调光而不产生闪烁?".所有评测设备的 PWM 测量概览请参见我们的 PWM 排名表.
由于屏幕有光泽,在阳光下进行户外观看可能会令人不快。可视角度良好,在极端角度下亮度损失极小,没有明显的绿色色调。
性能:受限于酷睿 i5-13500H 的性能,有点节流
华硕 VivoBook 14X OLED 配备了 英特尔酷睿 i5-13500H处理器和 英伟达GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 笔记本电脑图形处理器。.RTX 3050 SKU 可配置 Core i5-13500H 或 酷睿 i9-13900H.
配置 RTX 2050 移动选项,但只能配备酷睿 i5-13500H。
测试条件
华硕在 MyAsus 应用程序和 ProArt Creator Hub 之间进行了多余的性能设置,不过在大多数情况下,MyAsus 应用程序已经足够。不过,您需要使用 ProArt Creator Hub 访问全速模式。
我们使用全速模式进行所有性能基准测试,使用标准模式进行电池测试。
下表说明了酷睿 i5-13500H 的 PL1 和 PL2 值根据所选性能设置的不同而变化。
性能模式 | PL1 (PBP) / Tau | PL2 (MTP) / Tau |
---|---|---|
Whisper | 30 W / 56 s | 54 W / 2.44 ms |
标准 | 50 瓦 / 56 秒 | 82 瓦 / 2.44 毫秒 |
高性能 | 55 瓦 / 56 秒 | 82 瓦 / 2.44 毫秒 |
全速 | 65 瓦 / 56 秒 | 82 瓦 / 2.44 毫秒 |
处理器
酷睿 i5-13500H 提供 12 个内核(4P + 8E)和 16 个线程,单核心主频最高可达 4.7 GHz,TDP 为 45 W。 酷睿 i7-12700H的性能基本一致,但比酷睿 i7-13700H中的 微星隐形 14 工作室.
也就是说,在 Cinebench R15 多核循环测试结束时,CPU 性能下降了约 18%。不过,与我们在微星 Stealth 14 Studio 中观察到的酷睿 i7-13700H 相比,这种节流并不明显。宏碁 Swift X SFX14.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (13542 - 16335, n=5) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (1704 - 1799, n=5) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (5108 - 6212, n=5) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (655 - 687, n=5) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (2234 - 2475, n=5) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (243 - 261, n=5) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (205 - 263, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (50846 - 58567, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (5500 - 5885, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (9312 - 11465, n=5) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (1674 - 1762, n=5) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (14.4 - 17.9, n=6) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (44 - 65.5, n=5) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (0.471 - 0.51, n=6) | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
* ... smaller is better
在不同的性能模式下运行 Cinebench R15 多核循环可以发现,VivoBook 14X 的酷睿 i5-13500H 处理器无法充分利用其分配的 TDP 预算。在 "标准 "和 "全速 "配置文件中,观察到的峰值封装功耗仅为 70 W,而允许功耗为 82 W。
此外,这一功耗水平仅在初始循环期间达到,最大时钟频率约为 3.5 GHz。在 Whisper 模式下,处理器的峰值功耗可达 54 W,但测试期间的平均功耗仅为 16 W。
在电池模式下,Cinebench R20 的单核和多核性能分别下降了 45% 和 41%。
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (11081 - 15390, n=6) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (56813 - 74251, n=6) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (2621 - 3623, n=6) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (77835 - 85727, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (7249 - 8086, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (27820 - 38336, n=6) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (62657 - 120493, n=6) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (782 - 992, n=6) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (5955 - 8495, n=6) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (20212 - 37618, n=6) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
系统性能
VivoBook 14X 在 PCMark 10 和 CrossMark 测试中落后于微星 Stealth 14,但差距不大。在典型的日常使用中,系统整体性能流畅、反应灵敏。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5514 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6078 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 6645 points | |
Help |
DPC 延迟
DPC 延迟似乎偏高。在播放 4K YouTube 视频时,测得的中断到进程延迟时间最初为 709.20 微秒。
在 10 秒的 Prime95 压力后,该值增至 1285.40 微秒,这表明实时工作流在大负载下可能会受到影响。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
我们的DPC 延迟排名页面提供更多已评测设备的延迟比较。
存储设备
安装的三星 PM9B1 NVMe 固态硬盘为大多数应用提供了令人满意的性能。华硕在硬盘下方提供了散热垫,这有助于在 DiskSpd 读取循环测试中保持相对稳定的性能。
尽管如此,除了 4K 写入之外,PM9B1 SSD 几乎在所有方面都明显落后于竞争对手。没有存储扩展空间。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
更多存储性能比较,请参阅我们的 硬盘和固态硬盘基准页面。
图形处理器性能
华硕采用 40 W NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 笔记本电脑 GPU在 VivoBook 14X 中。对于配备第 13 代英特尔处理器的 2023 款设备来说,RTX 3050 4 GB 已经过时,我们在合成和游戏基准测试中看到了这一点。
累计 3DMark 性能比 RTX 3050 Ti在 申克 Vision 14相比下降了 23%,与 RTX 3050 6 GB 相比下降了 26%。 联想超薄 Pro 7.
VivoBook 14X 与较新的 35 W RTX 4050的 技嘉 Aero 14 OLED.
3DMark 11 Performance | 13942 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 70334 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36793 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8504 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4371 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3832 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (53 - 99, n=12) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 105, n=46, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (97 - 152, n=13) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 181, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (388 - 937, n=11) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (167 - 946, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
VivoBook 14X 的目标受众不是游戏玩家,但仍能胜任 1080p 超高清游戏,尤其是要求不高的电子竞技游戏。
在支持的游戏中利用升频算法,帧率可能会有明显的提高。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=81, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 179.9, n=83, last 2 years) |
Witcher 3 FPS 图表
鉴于我们在 1080p 超高速下运行TheWitcher 3 时观察到相对稳定的帧速率,因此 GPU 冷却并无大碍。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 175 | 167.8 | 100.4 | 48.4 | 33.7 | 32 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 150.4 | 68.8 | 70.6 | 40 | 24.4 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 163.4 | 141 | 135.3 | 115.3 | 57.1 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 99.4 | 52.5 | 37.7 | 27.3 | 15 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 111 | 95.2 | 78.9 | 66.1 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 127 | 68 | 61 | 57 | 39 | 19 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 179.7 | 78.6 | 65.2 | 57.9 | 41.1 | 23.4 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 232 | 123.6 | 96 | 44.1 | 32.1 | 12.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 51.7 | 38.2 | 28.4 | 25.3 | 15.6 | 5.57 |
F1 22 (2022) | 119.4 | 108.5 | 75.2 | 21.3 | 13.2 | 5.9 |
查看我们专门的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 笔记本电脑 GPU页面,了解更多信息和性能比较。
排放:将单风扇双热管组合发挥到极致
系统噪音
华硕为 VivoBook 14X 配备了一个风扇,用于冷却 CPU 和 GPU。 与我们在其他 VivoBook 机型上的发现类似,华硕似乎为每个性能配置文件设置了最大风扇噪音限制。
该公司声称标准配置下的风扇噪音低于 40 分贝(A)。我们在 "耳语 "模式下记录到的声压级为 31 dB(A),在 "标准 "模式下为 42 dB(A),在 "性能 "模式下接近 53 dB(A)。
在全速模式下,无论负载如何,声压级始终保持在近 53 dB(A)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 22.08 / 22.08 / 22.08 dB(A) |
Load |
| 52.98 / 52.67 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 21.46 dB(A) |
性能模式 | 怠速 dB(A) | 负载平均 dB(A) | 负载最大 dB(A) | Witcher 3 1080p Ultra dB(A) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Whisper | 21.73 | 30.61 | 31.13 | 30.67 / 34 fps |
标准 | 21.62 | 42.33 | 42.12 | 42.23 / 38 帧/秒 |
性能 | 22.08 | 52.98 | 52.67 | 52.65 / 40 帧/秒 |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Acer Swift X SFX14-71G i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -14% | -10% | -11% | 4% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 21.46 | 24.8 -16% | 25.3 -18% | 24 -12% | 22.7 -6% | 24.4 -14% |
Idle Minimum * | 22.08 | 28.2 -28% | 25.3 -15% | 24 -9% | 22.8 -3% | 24.4 -11% |
Idle Average * | 22.08 | 31.8 -44% | 25 -13% | 24 -9% | 22.8 -3% | 24.4 -11% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.08 | 31.8 -44% | 33.7 -53% | 35.71 -62% | 22.8 -3% | 27.8 -26% |
Load Average * | 52.98 | 38.2 28% | 42.2 20% | 43.8 17% | 43.3 18% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 52.7 | 50 5% | 51 3% | 40.22 24% | 43.8 17% | 48.2 9% |
Load Maximum * | 52.67 | 52.2 1% | 51 3% | 51.93 1% | 47.1 11% | 48.8 7% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
华硕宣称新风扇设计增强了散热性能,但单风扇双热管组合在压力下控制表面温度方面有其局限性。
在最大负载下,我们记录到顶部温度高达 49 °C,底部温度高达 54 °C。不过,触摸板和右掌托区域仍然相对凉爽。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.4 °C / 95.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.6 °C / -11.9 F).
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 16% | -0% | 18% | 21% | 9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 49.2 | 46.4 6% | 46.9 5% | 42 15% | 42.2 14% | 48.4 2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 54 | 49 9% | 56.1 -4% | 52 4% | 49 9% | 57.1 -6% |
Idle Upper Side * | 33.6 | 26.5 21% | 33.8 -1% | 26 23% | 24.4 27% | 28.1 16% |
Idle Bottom * | 37.6 | 26.6 29% | 37.9 -1% | 27 28% | 25.2 33% | 29 23% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
使用 Prime95 就地大型 FFT 对 VivoBook 14X 施加压力时,酷睿 i5-13500H 的峰值频率为 3.6 GHz,功耗接近 53 W。
加入 FurMark 后,CPU 的峰值功耗降至 48.6 W,持续功耗为 22 W。RTX 3050 的平均时钟频率为 1,192 MHz,功耗始终保持在 34 W。
压力测试 | CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) |
系统空闲 | 3.8 | 0 | 40 | 25.1 |
Prime95 | 2.95 | 0 | 80 | 25.3 |
Prime95 + FurMark | 1.75 | 1,177 | 72 | 68.3 |
Witcher 3 1080p Ultra | 2.56 | 1,506 | 63.2 | 75.6 |
Witcher 3,RTX 3050的峰值频率为 1,717 MHz,功耗为 40 W。Core i5-13500H 的平均功耗为 12 W,平均频率约为 2.6 GHz。
根据华硕的说法,VivoBook 14X 的散热系统可以承受 CPU 和 GPU 合计 55 W 的 TDP。我们的压力测试证实了这一说法,因为我们观察到运行 Prime95 + FurMark 时的平均功耗为 56 W,在Witcher 3压力测试中为 52 W。
发言人
VivoBook 14X 的立体声扬声器的峰值响度为 70.7 db(A),声音不够响亮。尽管如此,Dirac 调音仍能承受一定量的低音,同时保持平衡的中高音。
用户可以通过 3.5 毫米音频插孔或蓝牙 5.3 连接外部音频设备,获得更好的音频体验。
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理:空载和负载时的节俭
耗电量
与竞争对手相比,酷睿 i5-13500H 和 RTX 3050 的组合在功耗方面相当经济。在最大负载情况下,VivoBook 14X OLED 能够充分利用随附的 90 W 电源适配器。
而配备了Ryzen 7 7735HS和 RTX 3050 6 GB 的联想 Slim Pro 7 在平均负载时功耗降低了 8%,但在空闲、游戏和最大负载时功耗更高。
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.7 Watt |
Idle | 4.96 / 7.54 / 9.31 Watt |
Load |
83.4 / 91.74 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, , 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Swift X SFX14-71G i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5" | MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -30% | -100% | -14% | -36% | -26% | -37% | -27% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.96 | 8.4 -69% | 10.4 -110% | 7.4 -49% | 7.6 -53% | 7.5 -51% | 7.17 ? -45% | 6.54 ? -32% |
Idle Average * | 7.54 | 11.5 -53% | 19.1 -153% | 8.3 -10% | 12.2 -62% | 10.4 -38% | 10.4 ? -38% | 11.3 ? -50% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.31 | 11.9 -28% | 19.4 -108% | 8.7 7% | 12.8 -37% | 11.4 -22% | 14.8 ? -59% | 13.3 ? -43% |
Load Average * | 83.4 | 84.9 -2% | 95.9 -15% | 76 9% | 76.5 8% | 83.3 -0% | 89.7 ? -8% | 70.7 ? 15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 73.3 | 83.6 -14% | 141.6 -93% | 70 5% | 89.5 -22% | 92.7 -26% | ||
Load Maximum * | 91.74 | 104.2 -14% | 203 -121% | 132 -44% | 135.7 -48% | 110.3 -20% | 124.8 ? -36% | 116.1 ? -27% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power Consumption: External monitor
电池寿命
VivoBook 14X 的电池容量为 63 瓦时,虽然不能提供超长的续航时间,但在需要充电之前,它应该可以维持标准工作日的大部分时间。
在 150 尼特亮度下循环播放 1080p H.264 视频时,电池可持续使用近 10.5 小时,令人印象深刻。不过,这款笔记本的游戏续航时间要短得多,只有一个多小时。
随机附送的电源适配器能在 50 分钟内将笔记本电池电量从 0% 补充到 60%。
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | Acer Swift X SFX14-71G i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13V i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 72 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -19% | -19% | 16% | 29% | 39% | 29% | |
H.264 | 626 | 571 -9% | 396 -37% | 666 6% | 847 ? 35% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 486 | 462 -5% | 378 -22% | 457 -6% | 628 29% | 607 25% | 640 ? 32% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 75 | 76.3 ? 2% | |||||
Load | 67 | 39 -42% | 69 3% | 92 37% | 124 85% | 97.1 ? 45% | |
Reader / Idle | 678 | 1168 ? |
Pros
Cons
评语多功能多媒体笔记本电脑,改进空间大
华硕 VivoBook 14X K3405 将英特尔酷睿 i5-13500H 处理器的性能和效率优势发挥得淋漓尽致。 英特尔酷睿 i5-13500H的性能和效率优势。
这款笔记本电脑提供了不错的连接性,但 Wi-Fi 6E 性能需要进一步改进。此外,还缺少 Thunderbolt 4。
华硕在 VivoBook 14X 中使用了 2.8K 90 Hz 三星 OLED 面板,为新进编辑人员提供了出色的色彩特性。该面板在较低亮度水平时受到 PWM 的影响,但在较高照度下使用 DC Dimming 可以在一定程度上补偿闪烁。
华硕 VivoBook 14X 并不十分强劲,当然也可以从 GPU 和散热升级中获益,但它是一款性能良好的多媒体笔记本电脑,还可以进行一些轻度游戏"。
在我们的测试中,酷睿 i5-13500H 确实有一些优点,但 VivoBook 14X 的机箱和散热限制无法让 CPU 充分发挥其性能。35 WRTX 4050 本应是锦上添花,但华硕很可能为了降低成本而选择了老旧的 RTX 3050。
由于 VivoBook 14X 的单风扇解决方案很快就会达到极限,因此我们也希望华硕在未来的迭代中过渡到双风扇散热系统。
尽管存在这些限制,华硕 VivoBook 14X 仍然是一款极具吸引力的中高档多媒体笔记本电脑,价格接近 1,100 欧元(低于 1,000,000 欧元)。一个可行的替代方案是Lenovo Slim Pro 7 ,它提供 2.5K IPS 触摸屏和Ryzen 7 7735HS 。
技嘉 Aero 14 OLED 配备了 35 W RTX 4050 和Core i7-13700H ,提供了更先进的配置,前提是您愿意支付高昂的费用。
价格和供应情况
经测试,VivoBook 14X OLED 的酷睿 i5-13500 和 RTX 3050 组合售价为 ₹96,990,只能通过华硕印度在线商店购买。.
亚马逊印度和Flipkart仅有酷睿 i5-13500H 和 RTX 2050 的库存,售价约为 82,000 英镑。美国亚马逊和美国百思买似乎也只有配备 FHD+ OLED 面板的 RTX 2050 SKU,价格约为 850 美元。
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405
- 08/07/2023 v7 (old)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.