华硕 Vivobook 16 笔记本电脑评测：人工智能功能首当其冲--真正的生产力提升还是营销炒作？
据说，人工智能能让一切变得更好。
Vivobook 16 售价为 999 欧元，在显示质量、端口或其他功能方面可能并不出众，但新的人工智能处理器肯定会带来巨大的市场吸引力。Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
最终结论 - 与多媒体相比，更适合办公任务
Vivobook 16 显然是围绕其人工智能驱动的处理器设计的，配备了一系列人工智能驱动的工具和应用程序，以提高工作效率。然而，除此之外，这款笔记本电脑的其他部分给人的感觉显然很一般，使其成为办公任务的可靠选择，但除此之外就没有什么亮点了。
Vivobook 16 的售价接近 1,000 欧元，与预期相差甚远。显示屏的色彩范围甚至连基本的 sRGB 支持都达不到，3D 性能明显低于平均水平，电池续航时间也不尽如人意，端口有限且速度较慢。此外，它的制造质量也没有达到高级标准。这款笔记本电脑目前的定价似乎过高，华硕实际上是在为其内部人工智能应用程序和功能收取溢价。
Pros
+ 附加触摸板功能
+ 快速 RAM（但焊接）
+ 物理网络摄像头快门
Cons
- 显示屏边缘很容易脱落
- 所有 USB 端口速度都只有 5Gb/s
- 无键盘照明
- 无 SD 读卡器、无局域网、无 Wi-Fi 6E
- 低色彩 60 Hz 面板，无替代品
- Radeon 860M 性能低于平均水平
- 冷却系统不太平衡，偏右
- 运行时间相对较弱
$498.00
ASUS Vivobook 16” WUXGA Slim Laptop, Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics, 16GB Memory, 512GB SSD, Military Grade 810H, Fast Charging, Camera Shutter, Cool Silver, F1605ZA-AS56
- $457.90ASUS Vivobook 16 Laptop, 16” WUXGA 1920X1200 16:10 Display, AMD Ryzen™ 5 5625U CPU, AMD Radeon™ Graphics, 8GB RAM, 512GB SSD, Fingerprint Sensor, Windows 11 Home, Indie Black, M1605YA-EH54
- $6.952PCS Keyboard Cover for 16" ASUS VivoBook 16X OLED F1603 M1603 X1603 M1605, VivoBook Pro 16X OLED K3605 K6602 N7601 TN3604, VivoBook Pro 15X K6501 M6501 K3502 M3502 M1503, Zenbook 15 UM3504
潜在的竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 77.6%  | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $498.00 ASUS Vivobook 16” WUXGA Sl... 2. $457.90 ASUS Vivobook 16 Laptop, 16�... 3. $6.95 2PCS Keyboard Cover for 16" ... | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
2. 83%  | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $719.25 List Price: 750 USD | 1.8 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
3. 77.3%  | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng AMD Ryzen 5 8540U ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,089.99 HP Pavilion Plus 16 inch Lap... List Price: 730 EUR | 1.7 kg | 18.6 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
4. 89.7% v7 (old)  | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $20.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Clear Protecto... 2. $12.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Protector Film... 3. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... List Price: 957€ | 1.9 kg | 15.9 mm | 16.00" 3072x1920 226 PPI IPS |
5. 80%  | Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $18.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... 2. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... 3. $15.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... List Price: 799 Euro | 1.8 kg | 24 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
6. 82.6%  | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $825.06 List Price: 960 Euro | 1.9 kg | 15.2 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS LED |
与更高级的 Vivobook S16 相比，Vivobook S16 重量更轻、端口更好、显示屏更出色，而 Vivobook 16 则是更经济实惠的经济型选择--假设近 1000 欧元仍可被视为经济实惠的话。在 Vivobook 16 的宣传册中，华硕用 10 页的篇幅大力宣传其人工智能功能（来自 Windows 11 24H2 和自己的软件），并将Ryzen AI 7 350是其营销战略的核心。但是，除了 AI 功能之外，这款笔记本电脑到底能提供什么呢？
规格
Vivobook 16 (Ryzen AI 7 350)
Processor
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 8 x 2 - 5 GHz, 50 W PL2 / Short Burst, 40 W PL1 / Sustained, Krackan Point (Zen 5)
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB
, Micron DDR5, soldered
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 142 PPI, B160UAN04.3 (AUOA5AB), IPS, glossy: no, HDR, 60 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, 1024 GB
, 867 GB free
Weight
1.941 kg, Power Supply: 221 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
构造和功能--欺骗性的军用标准
Vivobook 16 有两种颜色可供选择：深蓝色和银色。在我们的测试机型中，只有顶部和底座是银色的，这两处比较光滑，容易留下指纹，而质地较软的底部则采用了非常浅的灰色。所有部件均由塑料制成。
Vivobook 16 的厚度不到 2 厘米，比大多数直接竞争对手略显笨重，因为后者往往更薄。不过，就整体尺寸而言，两者的差异微乎其微。重量为 1.9 千克，偏重。
底部由 10 颗两种不同长度的螺丝固定，拆卸十分方便。在内部，你可以看到散热风扇、M.2 固态硬盘插槽、Wi-Fi 模块和一个空的单内存插槽，以便将来升级。
底座有轻微的弯曲，但依然保持稳定，只是偶尔会发出吱吱声。相比之下，180 度的盖子尽管获得了军工级认证，但却显示出其脆弱性，即使是最轻微的弯曲也会导致显示屏的塑料边框翘起。
Vivobook 16 提供四个 USB 端口，其中两个是 USB Type-C。不过，所有 USB 端口都只有 3.2 Gen 1，这意味着它们传输数据的速度只有 USB 3.0 的 5 Gb/s，感觉已经过时了，尤其是 USB-C 端口。不过，Type-C 端口确实支持 Power Delivery 和 DisplayPort。没有 SD 读卡器，也没有 LAN 端口。与 华硕 TUF GAMING A16一样，除了一个 USB-A 插槽外，所有端口都位于左侧。这个位置可能会造成潜在的干扰，尤其是 USB-A 和 HDMI 插槽之间。
遗憾的是，Vivobook 不支持 Wi-Fi 6E，甚至不支持 Wi-Fi 7，所以你只能使用 5 GHz 和 2.4 GHz 网络。无线性能比较稳定，但略低于 1 Gb/s。全高清红外网络摄像头与 华硕 TUF Gaming A16全高清红外网络摄像头与华硕 TUF Gaming A16 的摄像头不同，它具有不错的清晰度和中低色彩偏差，还配备了物理快门。
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm FastConnect 7800; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1232 (847-1452)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm FastConnect 7800; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1729 (1616-1764)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (802-867)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX203; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø714 (656-790)
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø744 (647-806)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø671 (610-705)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm FastConnect 7800; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1219 (859-1436)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (883-942)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX203; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø530 (431-644)
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø915 (879-940)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø901 (877-918)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm FastConnect 7800; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1736 (1645-1771)
4 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
可持续性
即使提出要求，华硕也没有提供关于所用材料的可持续性或是否包含可回收部件的信息。不过，包装几乎全部由可堆肥纸板制成。
输入设备 - 附加触摸功能
按键尺寸为 1.6 x 1.6 厘米，方向键和 F 键的高度减半，后者也更窄。键程为 1.7 毫米，反馈明显，噪音适中，但空格键的声音稍大。虽然没有背光，但明亮的按键标签在正常情况下很容易读取。
触摸板略有放大，新增的智能手势功能也很方便。沿左侧边缘轻扫可调节音量，沿右侧边缘轻扫可控制亮度，沿顶部轻扫可滚动浏览内容。点击的感觉有点浅，左键点击有轻微的响声，但声音并不大。
显示屏 - Vivobook 的色彩范围不符合 sRGB 标准
华硕使用的是刷新率仅为 60 Hz 的 1,200p 16:10 IPS 雾面面板，似乎没有替代型号。标称的 300 尼特亮度得到了证实，照度达到了 89%。
黑阶和对比度都很稳定，但面板的运行速度相当慢。没有 PWM 闪烁，背光出血也几乎看不出来。
该显示器的一个显著弱点是色域覆盖率较低，只有 55% 的 sRGB 色域，明显低于平均水平，尤其是对于多媒体笔记本电脑而言。这正是像 小米红米笔记本 Pro甚至更实惠的 宁凯 A16 Pro都比它出色。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
B160UAN04.3 (AUOA5AB) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 326 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 303.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16.9 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 325 cd/m²
Contrast: 1358:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.48 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89, calibrated: 4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.85 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.79
| 351778 Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K B160UAN04.3 (AUOA5AB), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | 350783 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | 351568 HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng CMN1640, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | 345482 Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16", 165 Hz | 349566 Ninkear A16 Pro cso1623, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | 350288 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE LEN160WUXGA , IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 12% | 13% | 129% | 83% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 36.8 | 41.6 13% | 41.6 13% | 98.8 168% | 68.7 87% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 55.3 | 61.2 11% | 62.4 13% | 100 81% | 97.6 76% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 38 | 43 13% | 43 13% | 89.9 137% | 71.1 87% | |
| Response Times | 36% | 9% | 12% | 51% | 12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 18.4 ? 49% | 30.7 ? 15% | 39.2 ? -9% | 16.4 ? 54% | 27 ? 25% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 21.4 ? | 16.5 ? 23% | 20.8 ? 3% | 14.6 ? 32% | 11.2 ? 48% | 21.6 ? -1% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | -22% | 11% | 32% | 21% | 3% | |
| Brightness middle | 326 | 321.2 -1% | 324 -1% | 520 60% | 393.6 21% | 315 -3% |
| Brightness | 303 | 319 5% | 295 -3% | 510 68% | 398 31% | 298 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 92 3% | 88 -1% | 93 4% | 91 2% | 91 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.37 -54% | 0.2 17% | 0.35 -46% | 0.44 -83% | 0.17 29% |
| Contrast | 1358 | 868 -36% | 1620 19% | 1486 9% | 895 -34% | 1853 36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.48 | 8.7 -34% | 5.13 21% | 2.9 55% | 2.32 64% | 6.5 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.42 | 19.85 -2% | 16.11 17% | 6.2 68% | 3.72 81% | 26.5 -36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.92 | 1.82 63% | 2.99 39% | 1.1 78% | 1.05 79% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.85 | 9.2 -139% | 4.24 -10% | 4.3 -12% | 2.69 30% | 4.1 -6% |
| Gamma | 2.79 79% | 2.83 78% | 2.3 96% | 2.19 100% | 2.38 92% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 6739 96% | 6200 105% | 7318 89% | 7422 88% | 6086 107% | 6064 107% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
-6% | 11% /
11% | 58% /
50% | 52% /
39% | 8% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
华硕提供的面板在灰度和色彩精确度方面都存在明显偏差。虽然在手动校准后灰度有明显改善，但色彩仍然不准确。因此，这款面板并不适合用于精确的图像或视频编辑。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8584 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在室外，显示内容比较容易看清，不过图像确实显得比较模糊。
性能--人工智能驱动的生产力
其核心是 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Vivobook 的核心是 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350，辅以微软的 Pluton 芯片，可直接在设备上安全存储密码等密钥。它还配备了 16 GB 内存（可扩展至 32 GB）和 1 TB SSD。华硕将 Vivobook 定位为一款轻量级人工智能生产力笔记本电脑，不过其乏善可陈的显示屏可能会限制用户的内容体验。
测试条件
MyAsus 软件提供了影响性能的风扇配置文件。在测试中，我们使用了标准风扇配置文件。下表显示了 Cinebench R23 中每个风扇配置文件的 TDP 值。
| Cinebench R23 | 低音模式 | 标准模式 | 性能模式 | 全速 | 电池 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 循环开始时的功耗峰值 | 32 W | 50 W | 60 W | 60 W | 39 W |
| 恒定功耗 | 27 W | 40 W | 43 W | 35 W |
处理器
华硕使用 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350这是一款 Zen 5 CPU，拥有 8 个内核，主频高达 5 GHz。它还集成了一个 XDNA-2 NPU，具有 50 TOPS，用于本地 AI 工作负载。
在 Cinebench 循环测试中，最初几次性能下降约 17%，之后性能保持相对稳定。
在所有 CPU 测试中，Vivobook 16 的排名居中。在 Ryzen 5 8540U和 酷睿至尊 5 125U的性能明显优于 酷睿至尊 7 155H在 红米笔记本则明显领先。处理器 Ryzen 7 8845HS的 Ninkear A16 Pro不相上下。
在电池模式下，CPU 性能大约会损失 6% 至 7%。
Cinebench R15 multi endurance test
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2019 (1940.52-2419.4)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U: Ø1495 (1392.95-1639.81)
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng AMD Ryzen 5 8540U: Ø1511 (1423.89-1594.39)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2433 (2259.12-2745.18)
Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2337 (2329.51-2341.78)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100: Ø1505 (1473.3-1556.24)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (14383 - 14607, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Average of class Office (1577 - 20399, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1943 - 1953, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 8086, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average of class Office (246 - 3132, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Office (98 - 294, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Office (163 - 1956, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (7532 - 76886, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (662 - 14767, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (457 - 2836, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (1018 - 13557, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Office (510 - 2043, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Average of class Office (1.72 - 20.8, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Average of class Office (0.4098 - 1.135, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Office (763 - 31245, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (4113 - 125394, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Average of class Office (287 - 5398, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (404 - 18321, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (2075 - 66922, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (78 - 1366, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Office (432 - 17834, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
系统性能
在 PCMark 和 CrossMark 中，Vivobook 保持了自己的优势，与功能更强大的 RedmiBook Pro 和 Ninkear A16 Pro 相比，性能差距很小。虽然存储设备的延迟很低，但传输速度可能会更好，竞争对手的性能往往明显更快。不过，该系统在日常使用中感觉流畅、反应灵敏。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (2463 - 7578, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (2049 - 11108, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (399 - 1966, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6982 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average of class Office (7.6 - 185.2, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开多个浏览器标签页时，首次出现明显的延迟。我们播放 4K/60fps 的 YouTube 视频时会出现 2 次丢帧，而运行 Prime95 会进一步增加延迟。总的来说，总延迟并不特别值得注意，但在播放 YouTube 视频时，GPU 使用率的大幅波动非常突出。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储驱动器
华硕使用的是 1 TB Micron 固态硬盘。遗憾的是，这款硬盘并没有充分发挥其潜能，在长时间使用时会出现节流问题。不过，与直接竞争对手相比，它仍然是速度较快的机型之一。
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6992 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
6017 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
484 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
540 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
60 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
155 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
521 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
1185 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Sustained read performance: DiskSpd read loop, queue depth 8
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6360 (2361.91-6999.04)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3428 (2126.72-4927.26)
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4831 (2934.96-4951.38)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3215 (2929.72-3237.37)
Ninkear A16 Pro Authorain NV900-1T; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2073 (1608.86-2117.7)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3148 (2231.1-4875.67)
图形卡
集成 AMD Radeon 860MVivobook 中集成的 AMD Radeon 860M 未能给人留下深刻印象，在 3DMark 合成测试和游戏基准测试中均表现平平。在标准模式下，它的性能仅相当于 AMD Radeon 740MPavilion 的水平，甚至与 英特尔图形 4 核 iGPU的水平。在性能模式下，3D 性能提高了约 5%（3DMark 11）。
只有较老或要求不高的游戏才能在中高设置下流畅运行。对于大多数游戏来说，需要最低设置，即便如此，对于《赛博朋克》等游戏来说也是不够的。至少 30 分钟的《赛博朋克》测试序列仍然相当稳定（尽管设置较低）。
在电池模式下再运行Fire Strike ，性能只下降了约 5%。
| 3DMark 06 1280x720 Score | 14855 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 24821 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6804 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 149978 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22791 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3999 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1883 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Office (6.65 - 28.2, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average of class Office (7.96 - 28.9, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (4.18 - 35.7, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Average of class Office (9.6 - 58.7, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Ninkear A16 Pro | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
| Average of class Office (8.88 - 92.6, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M: Ø10.5 (8.25-10.8)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core: Ø9.91 (9.48-10.2)
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M: Ø10.1 (9.53-10.2)
Ninkear A16 Pro R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø20.7 (19.3-21.1)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS: Ø7.19 (6.83-7.37)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 125.1 | 113.6 | 33.6 | 13.5 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 78.2 | 50.9 | 50.7 | 39.8 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 40.6 | 21.6 | 15.5 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 52.9 | 41.6 | 34.9 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 88.5 | 34.7 | 29.3 | 25.2 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 23.6 | 17.9 | 14.6 | 14.3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 24.3 | 18.9 | 12.3 | 11.1 |
排放与功率 - 单风扇
噪音排放
即使在闲置期间，特别是在持续工作后，风扇仍会保持活动状态，即使在耳语模式下也是如此。不过，它的运行噪音很小，峰值仅为 24 分贝。
与同类产品相比，在重负载情况下，风扇的噪音会明显增大。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23 / 22 / 24.67 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 31.72 / 42.51 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) | ||
| 351778 Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Radeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | 350783 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N | 351568 HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng Radeon 740M, R5 8540U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | 345482 Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | 349566 Ninkear A16 Pro Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Authorain NV900-1T | 350288 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 12% | -4% | -3% | 1% | 0% | |
| off / environment * | 23 | 23.1 -0% | 24 -4% | 24.4 -6% | 23 -0% | 23.7 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23 | 23.1 -0% | 24 -4% | 24.4 -6% | 23 -0% | 23.7 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 22 | 23.1 -5% | 25 -14% | 24.4 -11% | 23 -5% | 23.7 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.67 | 23.1 6% | 26 -5% | 24.4 1% | 23 7% | 23.7 4% |
| Load Average * | 31.72 | 23.2 27% | 38 -20% | 32 -1% | 37.68 -19% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 41.53 | 29.2 30% | 37 11% | 37.68 9% | 31.9 23% | |
| Load Maximum * | 42.51 | 32.6 23% | 39 8% | 39.7 7% | 37.41 12% | 47.8 -12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.6 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
办公笔记本电脑很少承受大负荷，但多媒体机器更有可能承受大负荷。因此，Vivobook 16 的单侧散热系统在负载情况下会变得很明显。由于单风扇位于右侧，该区域保持相对凉爽，而左侧则明显发热。在压力测试中，我们测得底部热点温度超过 50°C。在正常使用时，当然不会出现这样的温度。掌托始终保持凉爽。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 20.7 °C / 69 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24 °C / 75.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+3.6 °C / 6.5 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 20.7 °C / 69 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24 °C / 75.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+3.6 °C / 6.5 F).
| 351778 Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M | 350783 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | 351568 HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M | 345482 Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | 349566 Ninkear A16 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | 350288 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 7% | -4% | -4% | 6% | 6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 48 | 33.2 31% | 42 12% | 40.3 16% | 43 10% | 41.3 14% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 51 | 41.2 19% | 44 14% | 45.9 10% | 50 2% | 32.7 36% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 22 | 23.4 -6% | 26 -18% | 26.3 -20% | 24.8 -13% | |
| Idle Bottom * | 23 | 26.6 -16% | 28 -22% | 27.9 -21% | 26 -13% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
遗憾的是，立体声扬声器声音较小，低音不足，但高音均衡。3.5 毫米耳机插孔可用于连接外部音频设备。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
Vivobook 的功耗相当标准。在压力测试中，它的耗电量一直超过 70 W，接近小型 65 W USB-C 电源适配器的极限。不过，在实际使用中，笔记本电脑不太可能长时间承受如此大的负载。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.6 Watt |
| Idle | 4.7 / 8.2 / 9 Watt |
| Load |
59 / 74 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| 351778 Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | 350783 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | 351568 HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M | 345482 Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 349566 Ninkear A16 Pro R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 350288 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | -5 Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 19% | 32% | -32% | -35% | 39% | 11% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.7 | 4.3 9% | 4 15% | 4.2 11% | 6.5 -38% | 2.2 53% | 4.51 ? 4% |
| Idle Average * | 8.2 | 8.9 -9% | 5 39% | 11.6 -41% | 10.7 -30% | 6.5 21% | 7.48 ? 9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9 | 9.1 -1% | 6 33% | 12.3 -37% | 11.1 -23% | 7.7 14% | 9 ? -0% |
| Load Average * | 59 | 31.7 46% | 40 32% | 61.9 -5% | 68.5 -16% | 42.5 ? 28% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 65 | 39.4 39% | 43 34% | 72.8 -12% | 21 68% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 58 | 35.2 39% | 39.1 33% | 104.4 -80% | 19.9 66% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 74 | 66.7 10% | 46 38% | 140.6 -90% | 107 -45% | 66.5 10% | 62.2 ? 16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 57 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption (Cyberpunk/stress test)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø73 (69.12-73.55)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.09 (6.57-11.394)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø64.7 (59.111-70.11)
Power consumption with external monitor
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø59.8 (56.633-72.7)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø60.8 (55.616-69.91)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø56.4 (43.379-69.81)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø46.9 (42.056-50.336)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.72 (3.4753-4.4457)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø58.4 (56.752-60.459)
电池寿命
42 瓦时的电池容量偏小，导致运行时间不足。在我们进行的视频和 Wi-Fi 测试中，当亮度降低到 150 尼特时，笔记本电脑仅能维持不到 7 小时。相比之下，同类机型的电池续航时间通常更长。
| 351778 Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 42 Wh | 350783 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 45 Wh | 351568 HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M, 59 Wh | 345482 Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh | 349566 Ninkear A16 Pro R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh | 350288 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 84 Wh | -5 Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 23% | 67% | 147% | 21% | 294% | 67% | |
| H.264 | 410 | 1308 219% | 736 ? 80% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 410 | 528 29% | 684 67% | 983 140% | 450 10% | 1614 294% | 632 ? 54% |
| Load | 68 | 79 16% | 124 82% | 89 31% | 114 ? 68% | ||
| Reader / Idle | 1150 | 1315 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Vivobook 16 是一款可靠的工作主力，没有任何突出的特点。快速的焊接内存和 AMD Ryzen AI 7（可处理本地 AI 工作负载）是最引人注目的方面。这款笔记本电脑的其他性能比较一般（或低于平均水平），包括 3D 性能。
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K
- 02/26/2025 v8
Christian Hintze
Office - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
