华硕 Zenbook Duo OLED (2024) 可折叠本评测:配备酷睿 Ultra 9 的多任务处理冠军
华硕的双屏幕 Duo 系列已经推出几年了,但副显示屏一直是一个小的附加显示屏。而新推出的 Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA 则拥有两块相同的 14 英寸 OLED 屏幕,使得该设备的用途非常广泛。除了有源手写笔和保护套外,还配备了带触摸板的蓝牙键盘,这意味着 Zenbook Duo 可以像普通笔记本电脑一样使用。
在硬件方面,Zenbook Duo 与之前评测过的 Zenbook 14 有很大的相似之处,两块 OLED 屏幕要么是 60 Hz 的全高清型号,要么是 120 Hz 的 3K 型号。所有机型都配备了英特尔最新的流星湖处理器。价格从 1499 美元起;我们的测试设备是配备两个高分辨率 OLED 面板的高端版本,即 Core Ultra 9 185H32 GB 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘,售价 3999.99 美元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.8 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | 1.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 15.95 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 | |
91.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.3 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.25 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
84.4 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 19.6 mm | 14.50" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 与 Zenbook 14 类似,只是更厚一些
Zenbook Duo 的基本设计很容易让人联想到目前的 Zenbook 14,因为它的盖子上也有大型Pro Art徽标,而且两者的手感相同。不过,Zenbook Duo 采用了深灰色(墨水灰),而且更重、更厚。底座顶部安装了相同的 14 英寸 OLED 屏幕,但上面可以放置带 ClickPad 的全蓝牙键盘。键盘由磁铁牢牢固定,覆盖整个底座,而不只是其中的一部分(像联想 Yoga Book 9 一样)。 联想 Yoga Book 9i).
底座底部内置了一个大脚架,可以满足各种不同的使用风格。当然,Zenbook Duo 可以作为带有普通键盘的普通笔记本电脑使用,这是 Zenbook Pro Duo 的一大优势。另一方面,用户也可以取下键盘,将两台显示器放在一起使用。此外,该设备还可以像一本书一样摆放,但在这种情况下,它在桌面上的稳定性不是特别好,而且脚架的设计也不是很理想。
在质量方面,Zenbook Duo 的金属机身给人一种非常稳定和坚实的印象;只有脚架有一点晃动。我们没有观察到任何嘎吱嘎吱的声音,屏幕盖也非常稳定。单手即可轻松打开屏幕盖,最大开启角度为 180 度。不过,铰链可以再紧一些,因为屏幕会有一点晃动。
如前所述,Zenbook Duo 的总重量为 1.7 千克(设备本身 1.39 千克,键盘 317 克),高度接近 2 厘米,比传统笔记本电脑(如 Zenbook 14、Zenbook 14、Zenbook 14、Zenbook 14、Zenbook 14、Zenbook 14、Zenbook 14、Zenbook 14)更厚。 Zenbook 14等传统笔记本电脑或 惠普 Spectre x360 14或联想的 Yoga 9i 14.但其尺寸与 Zenbook Pro 14 Duo差不多。65 瓦的插入式电源非常小巧,包括电缆在内仅重 191 克。
设备 - Thunderbolt 和 HDMI
Zenbook Duo 的端口与普通的 Zenbook 14 相对应:除了两个 Thunderbolt 端口外,用户还有一个普通的 USB-A 端口和一个完整的 HDMI 输出端口。不过,USB 端口都位于底座的左侧。蓝牙键盘还有一个用于充电的 USB-C 端口,但也可以通过底座前部的 pogo 销钉进行充电,非常方便。只要键盘锁定到位,它就会自动充电。但缺少读卡器。
交流
新款 Zenbook Duo 仍不具备 WiFi 7 功能,但安装了快速 WiFi 6E 模块,即英特尔的 AX211 网卡。配合我们的华硕参考路由器,传输速率非常高且稳定。测试期间也没有出现 WiFi 稳定性问题。
Networking | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
华硕安装了带红外模块的 1080p 网络摄像头,可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。在光线充足的条件下,图像质量非常稳定。还支持工作室效果(背景模糊、眼神接触、头部跟踪)。
维护
原则上,Zenbook Duo 可以访问 M.2-2280 SSD、电池或风扇等组件。不过,与传统笔记本电脑相比,操作过程要复杂得多。首先,必须拧下底部的脚架,然后用两颗螺丝固定底部的另一个盖子。下面有两根带状电缆,需要取下。然后才能卸下笔记本电脑的底座(用 Torx 螺丝固定)。对于没有经验的用户来说,这绝对不是一项简单的工作,而且我们也希望避免损坏测试设备,因此在这一点上我们停止了尝试。我们将尽快公布内部照片。
输入设备 - 带全键盘的 Zenbook Duo
Zenbook Duo 配备了一个额外的键盘,该键盘通过磁力吸附在底座上。连接强度非常稳固,键盘在使用过程中不会滑动一毫米。底部的触点可将键盘连接到笔记本电脑,并同时为其充电。取下键盘后,它仍可通过蓝牙与 Zenbook 连接。白色背光有三个强度级别,也可通过环境光传感器自动控制。
从根本上说,键盘的特性与普通 Zenbook 14 相同,因此键程为 1.4 毫米,布局也没有任何变化(例如,与 Zenbook 14 Duo 相比)。用户可以非常舒适地输入长文本,与传统的笔记本电脑/可折叠电脑相比没有任何劣势。这一点同样适用于 ClickPad,它的点击声音比 Zenbook 14 Duo 更小,感觉也更高级。 Zenbook 14.滑动性能也非常好。
两个屏幕都是触摸屏,自然可以用于输入。这时,附带的手写笔就派上用场了,它的效果非常好,但不能固定在机身上。这就是华硕触控笔 2.0 SA203H(4096 级压力),它的大小与普通笔相同,因此握起来非常舒适,即使长时间使用也是如此。它可通过 USB-C 接口充电。
此外,下方的触摸屏还可用作虚拟键盘,只显示键盘或键盘和模拟触摸板(键盘下方或右侧)。不过,使用起来比较奇怪,因为按键时根本没有触觉反馈。不过,鉴于笔记本电脑附带的键盘性能良好,我们认为没有理由使用虚拟键盘。
显示屏 - 配备两块出色 OLED 面板的 Zenbook Duo
与普通的 Zenbook 14 一样,Zenbook Duo 可选择全高清分辨率(60 Hz)或 120 Hz 3K 分辨率的 OLED 面板。采用了两块相同的三星面板,这在操作方面是一个巨大的优势,因为缩放问题已经成为过去,用户不会感觉第二块显示屏的质量较差,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo 就是这种情况。只要取下键盘,第二块屏幕就会被激活。华硕的 ScreenXpert 软件提供了丰富的选项,可以在两个屏幕上快速排列应用程序或激活虚拟键盘。一切都运行得非常好,只要稍加熟悉,用户就能真正充分利用两块屏幕。
在我们的测量测试中,两块三星面板的表现都非常出色,结果完全一致(略有偏差)。SDR 模式下的平均亮度为 384 cd/m²,加上低黑度,对比度非常高。主观画质也非常出色,3K 面板(2880 x 1800,16:10)上的所有内容都非常清晰,色彩也非常鲜艳。更高的频率(120 Hz)使屏幕运动更加流畅,响应时间也非常快。
这两块 OLED 面板的 HDR 功能也非常出色,我们测得小部分图像的最大亮度为 656 cd/m²,而几乎全白的图像亮度则超过 620 cd/m²。与 Windows 笔记本电脑一样,HDR 必须在设置中手动激活,才能正确显示相应的内容(如视频)。但是,当 HDR 激活时,色彩管理无法正常工作。微软急需在这方面做出改进,并效仿Apple 的做法,在显示相应内容时,显示屏可以轻松提供额外亮度。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 381 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA SDC419D, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen SDC ATNA33AA02-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA ATNA45AF01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA ATNA40CU06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -1% | -13% | 2% | 2% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.6 | 99.8 0% | 99.8 0% | 77.2 -22% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.8 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.6 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 91.8 | 95.4 4% | 89.3 -3% | 77.4 -16% | 98.3 7% | 97.4 6% | 97.6 6% |
Response Times | -131% | 0% | -5545% | -28% | -159% | 6% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.77 ? | 1.83 ? -138% | 0.77 ? -0% | 53.5 ? -6848% | 1.04 ? -35% | 2.4 ? -212% | 0.69 ? 10% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.76 ? | 2.03 ? -167% | 0.75 ? 1% | 33 ? -4242% | 0.95 ? -25% | 2.4 ? -216% | 0.71 ? 7% |
PWM Frequency | 480 ? | 60 ? -87% | 480 0% | 360 ? -25% | 240 ? -50% | 480 ? 0% | |
Screen | -73% | 6% | -24% | -28% | -31% | 11% | |
Brightness middle | 381 | 359.7 -6% | 378 -1% | 532.4 40% | 378 -1% | 356 -7% | 391 3% |
Brightness | 384 | 363 -5% | 384 0% | 502 31% | 379 -1% | 357 -7% | 392 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 97 -1% | 91 -7% | 98 0% | 99 1% | 98 0% |
Black Level * | 0.48 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 4.51 -182% | 1.4 12% | 2.33 -46% | 2.5 -56% | 2.6 -63% | 1.1 31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2 | 7.05 -253% | 2.2 -10% | 5.99 -200% | 4.7 -135% | 4.5 -125% | 2.4 -20% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 2.4 8% | 1.7 35% | 1.6 38% | 1.9 27% | 2.2 15% | 1.3 50% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.18 101% | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% | 2.2 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 6784 96% | 6112 106% | 6256 104% | 6314 103% | 6222 104% | 6246 104% | 6336 103% |
Contrast | 1109 | 12600 | 17800 | 19550 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.92 | 1.9 | 2 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -68% /
-69% | 2% /
3% | -1861% /
-1025% | -18% /
-20% | -63% /
-55% | 6% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
MyAsus 软件中提供了多种配置文件,我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro2)对其进行了测量。本地 配置文件默认为激活状态,但色彩有些过饱和。在日常使用中,这并不是一个大问题,因为色彩实际上看起来更浓一些。不过,如果您喜欢准确的色彩,我们建议您使用Display P3 配置文件,因为这里的色彩偏差仍低于 3 的重要偏差。
P3 和 sRGB 色彩空间都已完全覆盖,而且还有一个合适的 sRGB 配置文件,可相应地限制色彩空间。这里的色彩也非常准确。使用我们自己的校准功能,我们可以改善灰度的显示效果,但这也增加了色彩偏差,因此我们在此不提供该配置文件的下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.76 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.41 ms rise | |
↘ 0.35 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.77 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.42 ms rise | |
↘ 0.35 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz | ≤ 80 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
当亮度为 80% 或更低时,OLED 面板使用频率为 480 Hz 的 PWM。但华硕还在 MyAsus 软件中提供了所谓的无闪烁 OLED 调光设置。
虽然高对比度有助于户外使用,但光面触摸屏上的反光仍然是个问题,尤其是在明亮的日子里。可视角度的稳定性并没有引起抱怨。虽然在广角下会出现典型的 OLED 蓝色光泽,但这在日常使用中不太可能成为问题。
性能 - Core Ultra 9 和 32 GB 内存
华硕为 Zenbook Duo 配备了英特尔最新的流星湖芯片(酷睿 5、7 或 9),内存为焊接式,有 16 或 32 GB 两种规格。Zenbook Duo 没有配备专用图形处理器。
测试条件
与往常一样,华硕在预装的 MyAsus 软件中提供了三种能耗配置文件(标准、耳语、性能),其中性能 模式仅在主电源运行时可用。我们在下表列出了 TDP 值。
能源概况 | TDP | Cinebench R23 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | 最大风扇体积 |
---|---|---|---|---|
性能 | 64/35 瓦 | 15,923 分 | 3474 分 | 47.8 分贝(A) |
标准 | 64/20 瓦 | 12,688 点 | 3283 点 | 39.4 分贝(A) |
Whisper | 28/18 瓦 | 10,852 点 | 2866 点 | 30.7 分贝(A) |
我们在标准 模式下进行了以下基准测试和测量。如果您需要最大限度地提高 CPU 性能,性能 模式值得一试,但您也必须承受明显更大的通风噪音。
处理器 - Core Ultra 9 185H
核心 酷睿至强 9 185H是英特尔新一代流星湖处理器的旗舰产品,也是目前性能最强的 H45 处理器。酷睿至尊 9 的 TDP 范围为 28 瓦至 115 瓦,在 Zenbook Duo 的情况下,酷睿至尊 9 的功耗并没有得到充分利用,短期最大功耗为 64 瓦,随后降至 30 瓦,之后又降至 20 瓦。短期基准测试的性能非常好,但在持续负载情况下,性能会大幅下降。当然,CPU 性能完全可以满足日常任务的需要,但与旧版 Raptor Lake 芯片相比没有任何改进,正如我们之前在 Meteor Lake 分析中观察到的.电池模式下的性能保持不变。更多 CPU 基准测试 这里.
Cinebench R15 Multi sustained load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA -2! | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 -2! | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 -3! | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (12688 - 19851, n=17) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (616 - 18070, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1166 - 1912, n=17) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (308 - 1970, n=63, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4843 - 7651, n=17) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (442 - 735, n=17) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 755, n=62, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1582 - 3165, n=19) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (191.9 - 281, n=17) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=62, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Average of class Convertible (193 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (163 - 285, n=17) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51738 - 76331, n=17) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4199 - 5781, n=17) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9140 - 14540, n=17) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (3257 - 14267, n=39, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1490 - 2573, n=17) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (1216 - 2696, n=39, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9330 - 14230, n=17) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (986 - 1902, n=17) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average of class Convertible (319 - 2003, n=63, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (14.1 - 22.7, n=17) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 20.1, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (34.5 - 62, n=17) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (0.4313 - 0.759, n=18) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9220 - 18676, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (468 - 25226, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (48865 - 96463, n=17) | |
Average of class Convertible (2644 - 106512, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2394 - 4534, n=17) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average of class Convertible (182 - 4764, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (66785 - 95241, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (7255 - 11392, n=17) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (659 - 14835, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (24004 - 48020, n=17) | |
Average of class Convertible (1420 - 56839, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (53116 - 154066, n=17) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (678 - 1341, n=17) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1088, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4428 - 10078, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (254 - 13175, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (44809 - 53918, n=17) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average of class Convertible (5136 - 53406, n=62, last 2 years) |
我们还考察了 CPU 在其他两种能耗情况下的持续负载性能。与普通 Zenbook 14 OLED风扇相比,Zenbook Duo 可以从酷睿 Ultra 9 中获取更多电能(64 -> 40 -> 35 瓦),对于那些需要最大 CPU 性能的用户来说,"性能 "模式绝对值得一试。Whisper 模式下的性能自然较低,但仍足以完成简单的任务,性能下降也不明显。
Cinebench R15 multi sustained load
系统性能
合成基准测试的结果非常好--Zenbook Duo 实际上是一台反应非常灵敏的电脑。使用第二块屏幕时也是如此,因为在这里绝不会让人感觉到可折叠电脑的负担过重。在测试过程中,系统没有出现任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (6771 - 7510, n=5) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (10135 - 11331, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8797 - 10484, n=5) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (8793 - 10781, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1675 - 1971, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Average of class Convertible (310 - 1912, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1589 - 1875, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Convertible (389 - 1790, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1883 - 2102, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Average of class Convertible (252 - 2183, n=59, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (1329 - 1889, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Average of class Convertible (295 - 1868, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (264 - 293, n=5) | |
Average of class Convertible (84.2 - 407, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (248 - 267, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Convertible (49.4 - 314, n=59, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Convertible (407 - 2676, n=63, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU (508 - 532, n=5) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6771 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (69929 - 95718, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (16353 - 108544, n=62, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (64619 - 87768, n=17) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51114 - 93871, n=17) | |
Average of class Convertible (10177 - 117920, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (121.4 - 259, n=17) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试(网页浏览、YouTube 4K 播放、CPU 负载)中,采用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在单个驱动程序上显示出异常值,但重要的 "中断到进程延迟 "值非常低。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的 Zenbook Duo 测试设备中安装了 2 TB 版本的西部数据 SN740,首次启动笔记本电脑时,其中 1.79 GB 是空闲的。不过,M.2 2280 固态硬盘的基准测试结果喜忧参半。尽管重复进行了多次测试,但结果依然如故。至少在持续负载下性能没有下降。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Sustained read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡 - Intel Arc Graphics
在英特尔 iGPU 毫无进展的一段时间之后,新款 Meteor Lake 移动处理器现在配备了新的 Arc iGPU.酷睿 Ultra 9(与酷睿 Ultra 7 一样)配备了速度更快的 Arc GPU 变体,拥有 8 个 Xe 内核。正如在一些测试中已经观察到的那样,新 GPU 的原始性能非常出色,英特尔几乎将旧版 GPU 的性能提高了一倍。 Iris Xe Graphics G7这也足以在合成基准测试中以微弱优势超过 AMD 的 Radeon 780M。
iGPU 使用系统内存,在这方面似乎仍然存在驱动程序问题。与其他设备一样,在游戏中偶尔会出现帧率大幅波动的情况,导致无法在高细节下流畅地游戏。在 MyAsus 软件中,你可以为 iGPU 分配多达 8 GB 的内存(默认情况下系统会自动占用),但即使是这种手动分配也只能在短时间内起到作用。从下面的Witcher 3 测试中可以看出,几分钟后就开始出现波动。我们尝试了预装的驱动程序(5008)和当前的英特尔驱动程序(5330),但行为和问题依然如故。
这个问题在我们大多数短时间的游戏基准测试中并不总是很明显,但用户应该牢记。此外,英特尔在这里的合成测试中无法保持强劲的性能,一直落后于
Radeon 780M.在电池模式下,性能保持不变。更多基准测试,请访问技术版块。.3DMark 11 Performance | 11153 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8024 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3537 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Witcher 3 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 139.1 | 135.8 | 37.6 | 14.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 132 | 78 | 42 | 20.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 103.5 | 84.3 | 64.1 | 60.4 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 57.2 | 35.8 | 23.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 49 | 31.2 | 27.9 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 54 | 35 | 33 | 32 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 189 | 72 | 59 | 44 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 147.5 | 80.6 | 63.8 | 31 |
F1 22 (2022) | 78.2 | 70.9 | 53.7 | 14.4 |
F1 23 (2023) | 68.2 | 65.8 | 38.7 | 11.4 |
排放 - 带两个风扇的 Zenbook Duo
噪音
与普通 Zenbook 14 OLED、Zenbook Duo 使用两个风扇,这在日常使用中非常明显。虽然风扇启动速度相对较快,但在较低转速下停留的时间更长,使 Zenbook Duo 成为更舒适的工作伴侣。你也可以使用耳语 模式来完成简单的任务,不会有任何问题。如果对硬件要求更高,Zenbook Duo 的噪音肯定不会很低,只有不到 40 分贝(A),但我们也不会说它令人讨厌。在性能 模式下,我们测得的噪音为 47.8 分贝(A),在耳语 模式下最高为 30.7 分贝(A)。在我们的测试设备上偶尔会听到一些电子噪音,但远没有在 Zenbook 14 OLED 上听到的那么明显和烦人。 Zenbook 14 OLED.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 26.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 39.4 / 39.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 | Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04 | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 6% | 12% | -2% | -4% | 3% | 3% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 22.6 6% | 23.4 2% | 24.1 -0% | 23.6 2% | 23.7 1% | 23.4 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 23.1 4% | 23.4 2% | 24.3 -1% | 23.6 2% | 23.7 1% | 23.4 2% |
Idle Average * | 24 | 23.1 4% | 23.4 2% | 24.3 -1% | 23.6 2% | 23.7 1% | 23.4 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.7 | 23.1 13% | 25.6 4% | 24.3 9% | 24.6 8% | 23.7 11% | 24.5 8% |
Load Average * | 39.4 | 38.6 2% | 25.6 35% | 36.3 8% | 45 -14% | 37.6 5% | 39.3 -0% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.4 | 34.2 13% | 30.9 22% | 44.5 -13% | 45 -14% | 37.6 5% | 35.9 9% |
Load Maximum * | 39.4 | 38.3 3% | 32.6 17% | 44.5 -13% | 45 -14% | 41.7 -6% | 39.3 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在空闲模式下和执行简单任务时,金属外壳依然凉爽宜人,在负载情况下也没有任何问题。热点位于底座底部后部的中心区域,这就是为什么可折叠手机也可以放在大腿上。这样做的好处是键盘是一个独立的组件,因此温度不会特别高,用户在高负载情况下仍能舒适地打字。在压力测试中,处理器最初以 64 瓦的功率运行,几分钟后降至 30 瓦,最后稳定在 20 瓦。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.9 °C / 84 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-0.8 °C / -1.4 F).
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 1% | 8% | -4% | 4% | -7% | 5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 35.6 | 37 -4% | 39.3 -10% | 40.8 -15% | 39.7 -12% | 43.2 -21% | 40.9 -15% |
Maximum Bottom * | 46.6 | 37.2 20% | 45 3% | 40 14% | 45.4 3% | 47.8 -3% | 46.8 -0% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.1 | 31.4 -16% | 23.8 12% | 30.4 -12% | 25.7 5% | 28 -3% | 24.1 11% |
Idle Bottom * | 32.3 | 31.6 2% | 24 26% | 32.8 -2% | 26.4 18% | 32.2 -0% | 24.6 24% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Zenbook Duo 的两个扬声器音质很好,但无法与普通笔记本的音响系统相媲美。 Zenbook 14 OLED或 惠普 Spectre x360 14.不过,如果用户对音质要求较高,还是可以利用耳机或外置扬声器。
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理--即使使用两块 OLED 显示屏,运行时间也很有用
耗电量
在能耗测量中,我们在 Zenbook Duo 上使用了一个显示屏。使用两台显示器时,在全 SDR 亮度下,最大闲置功耗增加了约 5 瓦。基本上没有什么意外,如果允许处理器消耗 64 瓦,65 瓦的电源再次是不够的。如前所述,CPU 只在短时间内消耗 64 瓦,因此没有问题。不过,90 瓦的电源装置会是更好的选择。
Off / Standby | 0.56 / 0.71 Watt |
Idle | 6.9 / 10.2 / 10.9 Watt |
Load |
52.8 / 67.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Average Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -19% | 34% | 15% | -11% | -36% | 4% | -1% | 11% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.9 | 6.9 -0% | 3.2 54% | 4.2 39% | 7.8 -13% | 8.8 -28% | 6.1 12% | 5.41 ? 22% | 5.21 ? 24% |
Idle Average * | 10.2 | 11.6 -14% | 4.2 59% | 6.9 32% | 9.3 9% | 12.6 -24% | 10 2% | 8.64 ? 15% | 8.16 ? 20% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.9 | 20.8 -91% | 4.9 55% | 7.8 28% | 9.8 10% | 13.9 -28% | 10.3 6% | 12.1 ? -11% | 11.1 ? -2% |
Load Average * | 52.8 | 55 -4% | 40.5 23% | 46 13% | 62.8 -19% | 77.5 -47% | 53.3 -1% | 54.2 ? -3% | 46.2 ? 12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.2 | 44.9 -4% | 37.9 12% | 51.9 -20% | 46.5 -8% | 52.4 -21% | 42 3% | ||
Load Maximum * | 67.1 | 68.1 -1% | 68.6 -2% | 68.2 -2% | 96 -43% | 111 -65% | 67 -0% | 85 ? -27% | 67 ? -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
华硕在 Zenbook Duo 中安装了 75 瓦时的电池,MyAsus 软件默认将电池模式下的频率降至 60 赫兹。我们以 60 Hz 的频率进行了常规测试,并制作了对比表格。在 150 cd/m²(相当于最大 SDR 亮度的 71%)的 WLAN 测试中,我们的记录为 9.5 小时(120 Hz 时为 8.5 小时),SDR 全亮度时为 7 小时(120 Hz 时为 6.5 小时)。150 cd/m² 下的视频播放时间超过 13.5 小时,而 HDR 视频在全亮度下的播放时间略高于 5.5 小时。
我们还测试了两块活动面板的运行时间,并将结果列于下表。在最坏的情况下,即在两个 OLED 面板均为 100% SDR 亮度和 120 Hz 的情况下,处理器的最大利用率为 109 分钟。当然,这始终取决于设备的使用方式和内容,但总体结果是可以接受的。在设备开启的情况下,充满电大约需要 100 分钟,充电曲线完全呈线性。
WLAN 测试 150 cd/m² 60 Hz |
WLAN 测试 150 cd/m² 120 Hz |
WLAN 测试 最大亮度 60 Hz |
WLAN 测试 最大亮度 120 Hz |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
1 台显示器 | 561 分钟 | 502 分钟 | 422 分钟 | 390 分钟 |
2 台显示器 | 406 分钟 | 339 分钟 | 294 分钟 | 282 分钟 |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 68 Wh | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 76 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 27% | 3% | -26% | -27% | -37% | 14% | -7% | |
H.264 | 820 | 999 22% | 651 -21% | 407 -50% | 1010 23% | 773 ? -6% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 561 | 586 4% | 555 -1% | 555 -1% | 472 -16% | 386 -31% | 707 26% | 594 ? 6% |
Load | 146 | 219 50% | 129 -12% | 73 -50% | 81 -45% | 101 -31% | 134 -8% | 114.9 ? -21% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - Zenbook Duo 是市场上最好的多屏设备
全新的 Zenbook Duo 2024 是一款非常有趣的产品,也是我们迄今为止评测过的最好的多屏设备。一方面,这是由于使用了两个相同的 OLED 屏幕,因此不会出现缩放问题,也不会让人觉得第二个屏幕的质量较差。随机提供的软件也让双屏幕的使用变得更加简单。另一方面,用户不必在输入设备上妥协(无论是在尺寸、质量还是位置方面),因为随机提供的蓝牙键盘非常牢固地安装在底座上。键盘的键程为 1.4 毫米,打字手感与普通 Zenbook 14 等其他笔记本无异。如果不需要第二块屏幕,Zenbook Duo 也可以作为普通笔记本电脑使用,而不会让你立即进入深渊,不得不面对第二块屏幕。与普通笔记本电脑(如 Zenbook 14或转换器(如 惠普 Spectre x360 14但与其他多屏笔记本(如 Zenbook Pro 14 Duo、Zenbook Duo 表现出色。
集成的脚架尚未完全完善,因为设备向后倾斜时并不十分稳定,尤其是在垂直模式下(见上图),而且调节选项也很有限。您也可以将设备放在边框上,但这样会有向后倾倒的风险。因此,任何后续机型在这方面都有改进的余地。这种奇特设计的另一个问题是元件的检修非常复杂,因为有些电缆必须拆卸下来。这意味着大多数用户没有任何维护选项。
新款华硕 Zenbook Duo 2024 是目前市场上最好的多屏设备,因为除了两块出色的 OLED 屏幕外,由于采用了坚固的键盘,你还可以把它当作普通笔记本使用。
在日常使用中,Zenbook Duo 的速度很快,尤其是 32 GB 内存和 2 TB SSD 存储空间,为用户未来几年的使用提供了良好的装备。处理器 酷睿至尊 9 185H处理器(英特尔目前提供的流星湖一代中最强大的 H45 处理器),其实并无必要。薄型底座的散热选项自然有限,在正常能耗模式下短期性能不错,但处理器在短时间后会节流至 20 瓦。在性能 模式下,情况会有所改善,但此时敞篷车的噪音也非常大。与其他 Meteor Lake 设备一样,游戏时仍存在驱动程序问题,希望能尽快解决。
Zenbook Duo 的风扇性能总体上要好于最近评测的 Zenbook 14 OLED,但风扇启动速度也很快,偶尔还会有电子噪音。OLED 屏幕的电池运行时间自然在很大程度上取决于显示的内容,当同时使用两个显示屏时,电池电量自然会更大。不过,总的来说,Zenbook Duo 的表现还是不错的。
Zenbook Duo 最大的竞争对手是 联想的 Yoga Book的性能要逊色得多,尤其是作为传统笔记本电脑使用时,因为用户不得不对紧凑型键盘做出重大妥协。目前正在寻找双屏幕可折叠笔记本电脑的用户不能不考虑新款 Zenbook Duo 2024。
价格和供应情况
目前,亚马逊似乎是唯一提供 Zenbook Duo OLED 的零售商。遗憾的是,该产品在亚马逊 "暂时缺货"。建议感兴趣的买家定期查看亚马逊和华硕的官方产品页面,以了解供货情况。查看是否有货。
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA
- 02/25/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.