宏碁 Aspire 17 2024 笔记本电脑评测:薄弱的 dGPU 和令人失望的显示屏
RTX 2050 值得购买吗?
如今,专用的入门级和中端显卡正逐渐被集成芯片挤到一边。我们进行了一次实际测试,将宏碁 Aspire 17 的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 2050 与英特尔和 AMD 当前的 iGPU 型号进行了对比。Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
评价--物有所值,价格太贵
对一款产品的评价往往在很大程度上取决于它的价格。宏碁(Acer)的 Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ 就是一个很好的例子,它目前的售价约为 1150 美元。这款 17 英寸的设备可以是一款优秀的多媒体笔记本电脑,也可以是一款成功的全能型产品--只要制造商给它配备一个合适的显示屏就可以了。遗憾的是,采用 IPS 技术的全高清面板几乎在所有方面都令人失望。尤其是它的色彩空间小,色彩保真度低,导致画面苍白而不真实。其他方面也仍有改进的余地。例如,笔记本电脑的音质和风扇控制就有很多不足之处。后者在空闲模式下过于不稳定,而在负载情况下,与所提供的性能相比,声音会变得相当大。
这就引出了 Aspire 17 的主要问题:它的GeForce RTX 2050 与 Arc Graphics 140V/130V 或 Radeon 890M/880M 等高速 iGPU 相比,往往难以脱颖而出。无论如何,有游戏野心的用户最好还是选择 RTX 4050,因为它的性能一般都在更高的级别(另一方面,对于 "非游戏玩家 "来说,iGPU 已经足够了)。Aspire 17 的优势包括适中的温度开发和 Thunderbolt 4 端口。由于配备了 2x SO-DIMM 和 2x M.2,其升级选项也不差。它的电池续航时间仍然稳定,不过如果电池容量更大,续航时间会更长。
竞争对手包括其他售价在 1000 美元左右的 17 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑。在基准测试表中,我们主要选择了配备 iGPU 的笔记本电脑,以显示性能差异,并澄清 dGPU 是否物有所值的问题。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
宏碁 Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ 的售价约为 1,150 美元,但在撰写本文时,美国的主要在线零售商还没有销售这款产品。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ Intel Core 7 150U ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $8.98 King EBOYEE PA-1450-26 Charg... 2. $14.88 HSSDTECH Replacement for Ace... 3. $19.95 Aspire Laptop Charger Compat... List Price: 1100 EUR | 2.2 kg | 18 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $11.99 KEANBOLL 3 Pack Designed for... 2. $15.99 Laptop Charger Fit for Lenov... 3. $15.99 2 Pack Designed for 14.5" Le... List Price: 1380 USD | 1.5 kg | 13.9 mm | 15.30" 2880x1800 222 PPI IPS | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1200 EUR | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,199.99 List Price: 1400 EUR | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,859.00 HIDevolution [2024] ASUS Zen... 2. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... 3. $22.98 Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1700 EUR | 1.5 kg | 12.9 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $25.98 Deal4GO CPU & GPU Graphics C... List Price: 900 EUR | 2.1 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
Table of Contents
我们测试的机型名为 A17-51GM-70LZ,配备了 GeForce RTX 2050和英特尔 酷睿 7 150U2x8GBDDR4-3.200内存和1TB NVMe固态硬盘。其 60-Hz 显示屏的分辨率为 1,920 x 1,080 像素,宽高比为 16:9。不出所料,宏碁选择了 Windows 11 Home 作为其操作系统。从价格上看,这款 17 英寸设备目前的售价约为 1150 美元,我们认为就其整体包装和给人留下的印象而言,这个价格已经相当高了。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
案例
就质量而言,这款笔记本电脑的外壳可谓良莠不齐。盖子由金属制成,而底座则由塑料制成。后者在某些地方(如后通风栅高度处)并不十分稳固,在施加较大压力时会出现相应的变形。此外,机壳时不时会发出响声,这也影响了其整体质量。该设备的铰链设置得相当紧,因此需要用两只手才能打开。另一方面,它的表面处理却无可挑剔。
Aspire 17 的机身高度仅为 1.8 厘米,尽管占地面积很大,但却显得相当纤薄。2.2 千克的重量只能提供有限的便携性。
连接性
端口
这款 17 英寸笔记本电脑的接口选择非常合理。右侧有一个音频插孔、一个 USB A 3.0 端口、一个 RJ45 千兆 LAN 端口和一个 Kensington 锁开口,左侧有一个(非常薄)电源接口、一个 HDMI 2.1 输出口、一个 USB A 3.0 端口和一个 USB C 4 端口,除了 Thunderbolt 4 外,还支持 DisplayPort 1.4 和 Power Delivery。为了获得更好的连接性,这款 17 英寸设备本可以配备第二个 USB-C 端口和一个读卡器。另一方面,所有端口的分布也相当不错。由于它们位于两个侧板的背面,你可以使用外接鼠标,而不会有任何(空间)问题。
交流
该笔记本电脑使用英特尔公司的 Wi-Fi 6 无线模块。就 Aspire 17 而言,AX211 的发送效果一般,而接收效果则非常好。
网络摄像头
你不应对 200 万像素的网络摄像头抱太大期望。与大多数笔记本电脑一样,它缺乏图像精度,尤其是色彩保真度。它没有盖子。
配件
笔记本电脑随附几本信息手册和一个小巧的 90 瓦电源装置(包括电缆在内重量不到 440 克)。
维护
拧下 11 颗十字螺丝后,机箱底座就可以从固定装置中撬出,从而进入笔记本电脑的内部结构。两个内存组和两个 M.2-2280 插槽在组件越来越多的时代值得称赞。如有必要,还可以更换无线模块和电池。
可持续性
宏碁主要使用硬纸板进行包装。笔记本电脑用织物套包裹,电源装置用塑料薄膜包裹(材料有相应标记)。
保修
该设备在美国享有 12 个月的标准保修期。
输入设备
键盘
我们认为键盘可用,但不是最好的。它的反馈相对较软,可以更坚固、更清晰。另外,数字键盘空间很大,但却显得有些拥挤,这也让人有些困惑。功能行和中间的方向箭头也应该更大一些。此外,从某些角度看,按键字母并不完全清晰。白色背光具有两个强度级别,确保了在黑暗环境中的良好可视性。除了没有独立的电源键外,我们对大部分的布局都很满意。
触摸板
触摸板的性能略好于键盘。它的表面相当光滑,可确保手指顺利滑过,12.6 x 7.8 厘米的尺寸也很合适。它的多点触控手势在远距离操作时也很流畅。不过,我们希望点击区域的机械装置不要那么摇摇晃晃。作为一项安全功能,宏碁在左上角集成了指纹传感器。
显示屏
Aspire 17 最大的缺点是显示效果较差,在这个价位的机型中根本没有立足之地。
|
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 275 cd/m²
Contrast: 917:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.38
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
44.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
43.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.152
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ CMN N173HCE-E3C, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura CSOT T3 MNF307ZB1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Samsung ATNA40YK11-0 (SDC4181), OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S LG LP156WFJ-SPB4 (LGD0742), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 93% | 101% | 101% | 99% | -8% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 43.3 | 98.8 128% | 99.9 131% | 99.9 131% | 99.8 130% | 40 -8% |
sRGB Coverage | 64.5 | 100 55% | 100 55% | 100 55% | 100 55% | 60 -7% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.8 | 87.5 95% | 97.6 118% | 97.2 117% | 94.6 111% | 41.4 -8% |
Response Times | 13% | 97% | 95% | 98% | -17% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30.7 ? | 27 ? 12% | 0.8 ? 97% | 1.3 ? 96% | 0.4 ? 99% | 34.2 ? -11% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20.9 ? | 17.9 ? 14% | 0.8 ? 96% | 1.2 ? 94% | 0.6 ? 97% | 25.8 ? -23% |
PWM Frequency | 60 ? | 240 ? | 480 | |||
Screen | 59% | 650% | 198% | 281% | 8% | |
Brightness middle | 275 | 509 85% | 500 82% | 385 40% | 391 42% | 292 6% |
Brightness | 254 | 479 89% | 499 96% | 382 50% | 391 54% | 263 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 90 7% | 97 15% | 95 13% | 98 17% | 80 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.32 -7% | 0.01 97% | 0.03 90% | 0.02 93% | 0.25 17% |
Contrast | 917 | 1591 74% | 50000 5353% | 12833 1299% | 19550 2032% | 1168 27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.42 | 2.47 62% | 3.55 45% | 1.99 69% | 1.42 78% | 7.15 -11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.98 | 4.73 78% | 6.38 71% | 3.69 83% | 4.69 79% | 15.51 29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.38 | 1.06 69% | 2.55 25% | 1.79 47% | 1.49 56% | 4.13 -22% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 1.5 78% | 2.2 68% | 0.8 88% | 1.5 78% | 4.9 29% |
Gamma | 2.152 102% | 2.19 100% | 1.94 113% | 2.204 100% | 2.199 100% | 2.014 109% |
CCT | 6281 103% | 6790 96% | 6405 101% | 6474 100% | 6684 97% | 7178 91% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 55% /
60% | 283% /
454% | 131% /
162% | 159% /
216% | -6% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
是的,在某些方面,如黑色值(0.3 cd/m²)和对比度(917:1)还可以接受,但全高清面板在其余方面几乎都令人失望。正如我们在介绍中提到的,17 英寸屏幕的色彩保真度很差,覆盖的色彩空间也小得令人失望。仅不到 65% 的 sRGB 覆盖率让媒体内容(视频、图像等)显得相当苍白。
它的亮度也可以更好。虽然平均 254 cd/m² 的亮度对于许多室内空间来说已经足够,但在室外或类似的极端环境中,Aspire 17 很快就会达到极限。
约 21 毫秒(黑到白)和 31 毫秒(灰到灰)的响应时间也已经跟不上时代的步伐,尤其是考虑到一些竞争对手的 OLED 屏幕。另一方面,笔记本电脑的 IPS 面板至少不会闪烁。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.1 ms rise | |
↘ 8.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.7 ms rise | |
↘ 15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8738 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能
CPU 和 GPU 的性能有时偏向入门级,有时偏向中端。如果有一天 16GB 内存不够用了,也可以轻松更换。此外,它还可以扩展大容量存储空间。
测试条件
您可以通过 AcerSense 选择三种不同的配置文件,根据我们的测试,至少在要求苛刻的 3D 应用程序中不会出现帧速率偏差。另一方面,产生的噪音水平却有很大差异。虽然标准模式在负载情况下还可以承受,但在使用性能模式时,17 英寸设备的噪音会变得非常大,这就是我们 "只 "在标准模式下进行测量的原因。
赛博朋克 2077》循环序列 (FHD/Ultra) | 配置文件 安静型 | 配置文件 标准型 | 配置文件 性能 |
噪音 | 41 dB(A) | 44 dB(A) | 47 dB(A) |
性能 | 18 帧/秒 | 18 帧/秒 | 18 帧/秒 |
CPU PL1 (HWiNFO) | 25 瓦 | 28 瓦 | 28 瓦 |
CPU PL2 (HWiNFO) | 50 瓦 | 55 瓦 | 55 瓦 |
处理器
酷睿 7 150U 是猛禽湖一代中相对节俭的型号,配备 2 个性能核心(包括超线程)和 8 个效率核心(不含 HT),总共 12 个线程。在 TDP 方面,宏碁使用 28 瓦作为 PL1,55 瓦作为 PL2。150U 的速度与 Core Ultra 5 226V内的 宏碁 Swift 14我们最近也对其进行了测试。根据性能评级 Ryzen AI 9 365(华硕 ZenBook S 16)的性能要高出 30%,而 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370性能提高 60% 以上(华硕 VivoBook S 14华硕 VivoBook S 14).
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (6306 - 7909, n=4) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (32582 - 41382, n=4) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (1656 - 2165, n=4) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (58025 - 70820, n=4) | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (4387 - 5293, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (16042 - 20259, n=4) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (33007 - 41731, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (491 - 695, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (3417 - 4243, n=4) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (21802 - 38866, n=4) | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ |
系统性能
在系统性能方面,Aspire 17 在对比设备中排名最后,部分原因是它使用了 DDR4 内存而不是 DDR5 内存(见 AIDA64 表)。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (5940 - 6704, n=2) | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (9705 - 11094, n=2) | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (8292 - 9407, n=2) | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (7067 - 7837, n=2) | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (257 - 305, n=2) | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (463 - 554, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5940 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (36579 - 61190, n=4) | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (39827 - 68780, n=4) | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (44925 - 78327, n=4) | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Average Intel Core 7 150U (74.5 - 100, n=4) | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
它的延迟也不尽如人意。LatencyMon 工具可实时预测音频和视频编辑过程中可能出现的挂起。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
另一方面,安装的 NVMe 固态硬盘速度相当快。宏碁在我们的测试机型中采用了 1 TB 的 WD PC SN740,在测试过程中,该固态硬盘在写入和读取时都表现出色。不过,在长时间负载的情况下,它的性能会明显下降,而竞争对手的情况并非如此。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
GeForce RTX 2050 是 Nvidia GPU 中端(中上)以下仅存的产品之一。这款安培(Ampere)显卡采用 4GB GDDR6 VRAM 和 64 位接口,内存配置非常低廉。它的其他规格也不再令人印象深刻(如 2048 个着色器)。不过,RTX 2050 的 TGP 设置为 35 瓦,与速度更快的 dGPU 相比还算节俭。遗憾的是,它在合成测试中的表现无法与当前的 iGPU 相提并论。在 3DMark 测试中,RTX 2050 的性能大致介于 Radeon 880M和 Radeon 890M这无疑让人对 dGPU 的用途产生怀疑。
3DMark 11 Performance | 11973 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 114861 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32088 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7996 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3529 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8.26 - 80.7, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
与 CPU 性能类似,该设备的 GPU 性能也保持相对稳定。在使用 魅影自由的耐久测试中,我们注意到帧速率没有下降。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 145.8 | 135.1 | 89.4 | 45.6 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 130.3 | 115.9 | 109.7 | 103 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 85 | 49.9 | 34.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 107.9 | 83.7 | 67.3 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 170.6 | 76.1 | 63.6 | 55.6 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 41.2 | 33.2 | 31.8 | 30.9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 43.3 | 33.4 | 26.7 | 22.6 |
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 37.4 | 27.2 | 18.5 | 14.6 |
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 3.71 | 2.49 | 1.621 | |
F1 24 (2024) | 90 | 50 | 49 | 10 |
Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 22.9 | 20.8 | 16.2 | 8.74 |
Space Marine 2 (2024) | 36.8 | 31.3 | 30.6 | 22.7 |
Final Fantasy XVI (2024) | 17.4 | 16.4 | 15 | 14.1 |
God of War Ragnarök (2024) | 43.6 | 34.2 | 31.7 | 27.4 |
Until Dawn (2024) | 35.5 | 22.1 | 14.9 | 10.6 |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 40 | 37 | 25 | 19 |
排放量
噪音排放
Aspire 17 的声音往往比只配备 iGPU 的设备更大。即使在空转时,它的两个风扇有时也会不必要地加快转速,而且转速波动也很烦人。在负载情况下,笔记本电脑的噪音有时也会达到 44 至 46 分贝(A)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26 / 29 / 34 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45 / 46 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 17% | 9% | 12% | 16% | -1% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 23.2 7% | 25 -0% | 24 4% | 24 4% | 25 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 26 | 23.2 11% | 25 4% | 24 8% | 24 8% | 25 4% |
Idle Average * | 29 | 23.2 20% | 26 10% | 25 14% | 25 14% | 29 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 34 | 26.1 23% | 29 15% | 27 21% | 26 24% | 30 12% |
Load Average * | 45 | 30.9 31% | 40 11% | 40 11% | 35 22% | 49 -9% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 44 | 34.1 22% | 40 9% | 39 11% | 36 18% | |
Load Maximum * | 46 | 44.3 4% | 41 11% | 40 13% | 36 22% | 51 -11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
另一方面,其温度保持适中。在空闲模式下,整个机箱保持良好的冷却状态,最高温度为 30 °C。在 3D 应用程序中,某些区域的温度会突破 40 °C,但总体而言,温度值尚可。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.8 °C / 1.4 F).
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -9% | 4% | -11% | -13% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 46.2 -10% | 41 2% | 49 -17% | 48 -14% | 46 -10% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45 | 41 9% | 45 -0% | 59 -31% | 53 -18% | 48 -7% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 34 -21% | 26 7% | 28 -0% | 31 -11% | 27 4% |
Idle Bottom * | 30 | 33.8 -13% | 28 7% | 29 3% | 32 -7% | 28 7% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
元件也不会发热致死。运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,CPU 和 GPU 的发热温度略低于 60°C,完全无害。
发言人
遗憾的是,它的扬声器还有很大的改进空间。它们的最大音量、低音和中音都相当令人失望,因此您应该尽可能连接耳机或外置扬声器。
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
耗电量
与性能相比,这款笔记本电脑的功耗既不算差,也不算特别好。Aspire 17 的负载功耗为 58 至 91 瓦,与华硕 VivoBook S 14 不相上下。而 5 至 8 瓦的闲置功耗则要省钱一些。
Off / Standby | 0.2 / 1 Watt |
Idle | 5 / 6 / 8 Watt |
Load |
62 / 91 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 8% | 16% | -24% | -2% | -37% | -47% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5 | 3.4 32% | 5 -0% | 6 -20% | 6 -20% | 7 -40% | 6.78 ? -36% |
Idle Average * | 6 | 8.8 -47% | 6 -0% | 8 -33% | 7 -17% | 8 -33% | 11.3 ? -88% |
Idle Maximum * | 8 | 9.3 -16% | 10 -25% | 14 -75% | 13 -63% | 11 -38% | 13.4 ? -68% |
Load Average * | 62 | 45.4 27% | 36 42% | 76 -23% | 44 29% | 76 -23% | 71.1 ? -15% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 57.6 | 49.4 14% | 41.6 28% | 58.6 -2% | 44.6 23% | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 54.4 | 44.8 18% | 38.2 30% | 61.9 -14% | |||
Load Maximum * | 91 | 66.3 27% | 60 34% | 94 -3% | 58 36% | 136 -49% | 117.3 ? -29% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 98.2 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
不过,它的电池续航时间只能令人部分满意。iGPU 竞争对手使用的是 65 到 78 瓦时的电池,而 Aspire 17 只能使用 50 瓦时。在我们的 WLAN 测试中,亮度降低到 150 cd/m²,17 英寸设备的续航时间为 7:20 小时。相比之下:竞争对手的续航时间在 12 到 17 小时之间。
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ Core 7 150U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 50 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 70 Wh | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 65 Wh | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 75 Wh | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 78 Wh | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 57 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 132% | 70% | 124% | 63% | 27% | 42% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 442 | 1025 132% | 753 70% | 990 124% | 722 63% | 561 27% | 626 ? 42% |
Reader / Idle | 2760 | 1902 | 1290 | 1168 ? | |||
H.264 | 976 | 821 ? | |||||
Load | 148 | 165 | 100 | 97.8 ? |
Notebookcheck 总评分
宏碁 Aspire 17 的性价比令人失望。尤其是它的显示屏和图形性能,只能在有限的范围内满足现代需求。
Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ
- 11/19/2024 v8
Florian Glaser
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.