Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar华硕 ZenBook S 16 OLED 笔记本电脑评测：Ryzen AI 9 365 和 Radeon 880M 的首秀
我们评测的 ZenBook S 16 变体型号为 UM5606WA，目前的售价约为 1,700 欧元（约合 1886 美元），考虑到其性能，这个价格相当昂贵。在这个价格上，华硕搭载了前面提到的 Ryzen AI 9 365包括 Radeon 880M以及 24 GB 快速 LPDDR5X 内存（不可扩展）和 1 TB NVMe SSD。生成的图像以 16:10 格式显示在光洁的 OLED 面板上，其分辨率相对较高，为 2,880 x 1,800 像素，具有 HDR 功能，指定频率为 120 Hz。操作系统为 Windows 11 Home。
ZenBook S 16 的主要竞争对手是配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 处理器的笔记本电脑，例如 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 16(7 155H& Arc 8).为了更好地分类，对比表中还有 Ryzen 7000 和 Ryzen 8000 系列的两款笔记本电脑，它们基于旧版的 Ryzen 780MTDP 与三星电脑相似 (联想 ThinkPad T16 G2& HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16).文章中的照片来自相同的 ZenBook S 16配备 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370和 Radeon 890M的 ZenBook S 16，最近进行了测试（只是色调略有不同）。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.1 % | v8 | 09/2024 | Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M | 1.5 kg | 12.9 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 84.7 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.5 kg | 12.9 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 88.9 % | v7 (old) | 04/2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.5 kg | 12.5 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 87.2 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.8 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 89.9 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.8 kg | 23.8 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 |
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击 这里可在此处查阅。
案例
这款 16 英寸机型的外壳非常时尚，给人留下了深刻印象，据生产商称，外壳由陶瓷制成（华硕使用的营销术语是铈铝合金）。尽管高度只有 1.3 厘米（约 0.5 英寸），但磨砂表面却出奇地稳定。只有触摸板和键盘的中间部分在施加较大压力时会出现明显的弯曲。1.5 千克（约 3.3 磅）的重量在 16 英寸的同类产品中也是相当低的，运输起来非常舒适。此外，它还配备了一个非常紧凑的 65 瓦电源，连同电缆重量不到 200 克（约 7 盎司），但在运行过程中会变得相当热。
总的来说，ZenBook S 16 的做工无可挑剔。测试设备的所有部件都能整齐地安装在一起。虽然铰链只允许约 135° 的开启角度，但它们给人的印象非常紧密，尽管单手仍可开启。
设备
尽管我们希望能增加一个 USB-A 端口，但总体来说，连接性还是很可靠的，最重要的是，它很现代。在三个可用的 USB 端口中，两个 Type-C 接口支持 USB 4，包括 Power Delivery 和 DisplayPort。此外，还有一个组合音频连接、一个 HDMI 2.1 端口和一个速度极快的 SD 读卡器。
焊接的 Wi-Fi 7 芯片（联发科 MT7925）的速度非常好，尤其是在接收方面。
与几乎所有笔记本电脑一样，网络摄像头的效果相当标准。除了色彩保真度外，图像清晰度也有待提高。
从升级角度来看，该设备令人失望。如前所述，ZenBook S 16 板载了 WLAN 和内存，但只有固态硬盘是插入式的，因此可以更换，而 ZenBook S 16 只提供了一个 M.2 插槽，这在 16 英寸产品中并不算出色。
包装主要由纸板制成。笔记本本身用纸箔包裹。只有电源装置使用了塑料。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
输入设备
ZenBook S 16 具有良好（键盘）到非常良好（触摸板）的输入设备。就笔者的口味而言，键盘还可以更清脆一些，但在其他方面也能提供良好的键入体验。虽然大部分按键的尺寸都比较合适，但华硕对 F 行和方向箭头的按键采用了相当小的尺寸。此外，按键布局也不尽人意，例如电源键就被简单地整合到了主键块中。可多级调节的灯光效果还是不错的。
触摸板尺寸宽大，不到 15 x 10 厘米（约 5.9 x 3.9），具有良好的滑动性能和令人信服的精度，给人留下了深刻印象。另一方面，点击表面在声学和触觉上都比较粗糙。
显示屏
OLED 面板的型号与已经测试过的 ZenBook S 16(ATNA60CL10-0）相同，这意味着大部分数值都非常相似。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 391 cd/m²
Contrast: 19550:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 1.49
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.199
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE B160UAN01.K, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16", Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 1% | 1% | -15% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.8 | 99.9 0% | 99.5 0% | 99.6 0% | 75.9 -24% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 98.2 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94.6 | 95.6 1% | 97.5 3% | 96.5 2% | 77.2 -18% |
| Response Times | -16% | -41% | -49% | -7242% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.4 ? | 0.56 ? -40% | 0.64 ? -60% | 0.8 ? -100% | 40.8 ? -10100% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 0.6 ? | 0.65 ? -8% | 0.68 ? -13% | 0.89 ? -48% | 26.9 ? -4383% |
| PWM Frequency | 480 | 480 0% | 240 ? -50% | 491.8 ? 2% | |
| Screen | 26% | 15% | -23% | -215% | |
| Brightness middle | 391 | 407 4% | 385 -2% | 399.4 2% | 446 14% |
| Brightness | 391 | 405 4% | 391 0% | 405 4% | 425 9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 97 -1% | 97 -1% | 98 0% | 91 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.02 | 0.02 -0% | 0.28 -1300% | ||
| Contrast | 19550 | 20350 4% | 1593 -92% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.42 | 0.6 58% | 1.1 23% | 4.05 -185% | 3.7 -161% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.69 | 1.2 74% | 1.8 62% | 6.69 -43% | 8.8 -88% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.49 | 1.02 32% | 1.6 -7% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 0.5 67% | 1.4 7% | 1.1 27% | 6 -300% |
| Gamma | 2.199 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.27 97% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6684 97% | 6453 101% | 6444 101% | 6419 101% | 6499 100% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
12% | -8% /
-3% | -24% /
-24% | -2491% /
-1176% |
* ... smaller is better
在 SDR 模式下，大致达到了华硕规定的 400 cd/m²，这对于大多数室内区域来说绰绰有余，但由于表面反射率较高，对于室外使用来说已是极限。
作为 OLED 的典型代表，在黑阶和对比度方面没有什么可抱怨的。与传统的 IPS 面板相比，它的画面显得更加震撼和饱和。此外，正如我们的 CalMAN 测量结果所显示的那样，色彩非常干净。
ZenBook S 16 的快速响应时间也获得了好评，不过买家可能不得不忍受 480 Hz 的闪烁，这对某些人来说可能是个问题。另一方面，ZenBook S 16 的可视角度也无可挑剔。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz Amplitude: 30 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17263 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
在性能方面，ZenBook S 16 在多媒体和办公笔记本电脑中处于中等水平。24 GB 内存足够大多数用户使用多年。如果需要，1 TB SSD 可以更换为更大的型号。
测试条件
预装的 MyAsus 应用程序提供四种不同的风扇模式。与其他 ZenBook S 16 - 我们的测量基于标准配置，因为 3D 性能几乎没有随着配置的增强而提高，但噪音却明显增加。不出所料，它在耳语模式下最安静，当然是以牺牲速度为代价（见表）。
| 赛博朋克 2077 (FHD/Ultra) | Whisper | Standard | Performance | Full speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 噪音 | 32 dB(A) | 36 dB(A) | 43 dB(A) | 44 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 14 fps | 20 fps | 20 fps | 20 fps |
处理器
与 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 相比，AI 9 365 "只 "包含 10 个而不是 12 个核心，这导致同时运行的线程数（包括 SMT）从 24 个减少到 20 个。为了实现机箱的纤薄线条，华硕在两种情况下都使用了相对较低的 TDP（28 瓦 PL1 和 33 瓦 PL2），这意味着最大性能方面的限制。在 Cinebench R15 循环测试中，AI 9 365 的性能超过了 Ryzen 7 8840HS以及 Ryzen 7 7840U这两款笔记本的性能更加稳定。
不过，如果将所有 CPU 基准测试合并计算，新一代产品则略胜一筹。根据我们的性能评级，AI 9 HX 370 以不到 16% 的优势胜出，而酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 仅稍快一些。
Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (17096 - 29902, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (61976 - 114482, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2951 - 4803, n=2) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (85333 - 93045, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (11586 - 16039, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (33409 - 61298, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47468 - 64702, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (706 - 1227, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (302 - 1973, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (9061 - 16159, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47654 - 50517, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
系统性能
在测试中，ZenBook S 16 的两个版本提供了最佳的系统性能。系统启动、反应和加载速度都非常快。工作内存的速度也令人印象深刻。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (7045 - 7641, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (10421 - 11140, n=2) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (10150 - 10293, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (8973 - 10559, n=2) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M () | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M () | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M () | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2564, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M () | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M () | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 476, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (255 - 263, n=3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 348, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (363 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (445 - 456, n=3) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7045 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (88985 - 90113, n=2) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 94300, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (89012 - 99376, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (98687 - 100507, n=2) | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 100507, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (116.3 - 119.5, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=79, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在延迟方面，买家必须做出让步。LatencyMon 工具证明，这款 16 英寸设备的延迟值并不理想，这可能会导致在实时编辑音频和视频时出现掉线现象。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
大容量存储既不逊色，速度也不是特别快，但在同类产品中名列前茅。内置的基于 NVMe 的 Micron 2400 即使长时间使用也能提供稳定的性能，我们的 DiskSpd 循环证明了这一点。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous reading performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
与 Radeon 890M 相比，Radeon 880M 只有 768 个着色器单元，而不是 1024 个着色器单元，因此对 Radeon 880M 的评估并不容易，因为华硕依赖于 Ryzen AI 9 相当适中的 TDP。
在合成图形测试中，当使用几乎相同的 PL1 值时，它的性能仅略高于前代产品 Radeon 780M。这一结果有些令人沮丧。英特尔 Arc 8 和 Radeon 890M 的最终结果约为正 10%。如果采用更高的 TDP，新款 Radeons 的性能也会相应提高。一个很好的例子是 VivoBook S 14 OLED华硕将 PL1 设置为 54 瓦，PL2 设置为 65 瓦，但这款笔记本电脑在正常运行时仍然相当经济，电池运行时间也非常出色。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 39128 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12375 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 167077 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29760 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6861 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3272 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
虽然 Radeon 680M和 780M 的评价相当积极，但 Radeon 880M 的表现却不尽如人意，原因是现在新游戏对硬件的要求要高得多。要求较高的游戏如Alan Wake 2、 Horizon Forbidden West和 星球大战亡命之徒甚至在使用 1,920 x 1,080 像素和低设置时都无法流畅运行。较老和/或 CPU 密集度较低的游戏，如Far Cry 5 、Counter-Strike2 和F124 等，即使在高设置下，至少在全高清状态下仍可在某些地方运行。
因此，Radeon 880M 只适合愿意大幅降低设置和分辨率的偶尔游戏玩家。AMD 还应该在驱动程序上下功夫：在测试的游戏中，有三款完全无法启动（Resident Evil 4 Remake,Atlas Fallen& Dragon's Dogma2）。 龙之教条 2).游戏基准测试的性能排名与 GPU 合成测试类似，880M 甚至排在了后面。
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 880M () | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 880M (27.5 - 32.7, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
毕竟，ZenBook S 16 与 Ryzen AI 9 365 的配合似乎比与 HX 370 的配合更好：在 30 分钟的测试中 赛博朋克 2077的 30 分钟测试中，性能没有出现奇怪的下降（见图）。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS-Diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| GTA V (2015) | 148.5 | 132.3 | 62.7 | 27.5 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 147.1 | 109.3 | 31.1 | 29 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 66.5 | 34.6 | 25.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 64.1 | 51.2 | 39.8 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 76 | 43 | 40 | 37 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 156.1 | 64.2 | 53.7 | 44.2 |
| Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 32.4 | 25 | 19.3 | 12.3 |
| Returnal (2023) | 27 | 26 | 23 | 19 |
| Atomic Heart (2023) | 46.2 | 34 | 20.5 | 15.2 |
| Company of Heroes 3 (2023) | 61.2 | 46.2 | 36.5 | 36 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023) | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start |
| Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) | 24.8 | 21 | 17.5 | 15.7 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 31.1 | 24.4 | 19.6 | 17.6 |
| Atlas Fallen (2023) | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start |
| Armored Core 6 (2023) | 37.1 | 32.7 | 26.1 | 26 |
| The Crew Motorfest (2023) | 32 | 30 | 24 | 20 |
| Lies of P (2023) | 43 | 37.5 | 30.1 | 28.3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 37.2 | 29.1 | 23.9 | 20 |
| Counter-Strike 2 (2023) | 95 | 70 | 45.6 | 32.7 |
| Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 41 | 35 | 34 | 25 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 83.3 | 54.6 | 30.8 | 23.4 |
| Lords of the Fallen (2023) | 19.6 | 17.1 | 15.2 | 10.9 |
| Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 15.3 | 13.8 | 12.2 | |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 56 | 48 | 34 | 31 |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 19 | 16 | 14 | 8.3 |
| The Finals (2023) | 60.7 | 43.3 | 38.5 | 28 |
| Ready or Not (2023) | 59.4 | 47.3 | 33.7 | 21.6 |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 168.5 | 128.6 | 120.5 | |
| Palworld (2024) | 54.9 | 42.1 | 23.8 | 21.3 |
| Enshrouded (2024) | 18.4 | 17 | 13.8 | 9.73 |
| Helldivers 2 (2024) | 32 | 24.6 | 22.7 | 21.1 |
| Skull & Bones (2024) | 33 | 29 | 23 | 17 |
| Last Epoch (2024) | 53.8 | 41.3 | 34.7 | 24.9 |
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 18.8 | 16.6 | 12.5 | 12.4 |
| Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | ||
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 29.3 | 23.7 | 20.2 | 16 |
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 14.6 | 12.3 | 9.2 | |
| F1 24 (2024) | 63 | 53 | 39 | 8 |
| The First Descendant (2024) | 37.6 | 23.4 | 17.3 | 14.7 |
| Once Human (2024) | 36.1 | 25.3 | 22.8 | 20.6 |
| Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 14.7 | 13.2 | 11.5 | 8.52 |
排放量
噪音排放
背景噪音与功能更强大的 ZenBook S 16.使用标准模式时，16 英寸设备在空闲模式下的噪音为 24 至 26 分贝（A）（风扇经常静止不动），在负载情况下为 35 至 36 分贝（A）。这些数值代表了适中的结果，对于大多数买家来说应该是可以接受的。竞争对手在此方面也处于类似水平。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24 / 25 / 26 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 35 / 36 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M | Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -5% | 7% | 5% | |
| off / environment * | 24 | 24.7 -3% | 24.6 -3% | 22.9 5% | 24.5 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24 | 24.7 -3% | 24.6 -3% | 23 4% | 24.5 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 25 | 24.7 1% | 24.6 2% | 23 8% | 24.5 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26 | 26.4 -2% | 26.4 -2% | 23 12% | 24.5 6% |
| Load Average * | 35 | 35.7 -2% | 40 -14% | 23.8 32% | 26.6 24% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 36 | 36.8 -2% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 36 | 36.8 -2% | 40 -11% | 43.8 -22% | 35.5 1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40 | 43.8 | 37.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度值并不理想。这两款 ZenBook 在空闲和负载模式下都达到了测试领域的最高值。这个问题当然可以通过稍厚的机箱和相应更大的散热系统来解决，但华硕完全致力于轻薄化趋势--无论这是否合理。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.2 °C / -11.2 F).
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 3% | 20% | 12% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 48 | 46.9 2% | 40.9 15% | 42.6 11% | 48.7 -1% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 53 | 53.5 -1% | 42.6 20% | 47.8 10% | 52 2% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 31 | 29.5 5% | 24.5 21% | 27.4 12% | 26.4 15% |
| Idle Bottom * | 32 | 30.2 6% | 24.8 22% | 27.8 13% | 26.3 18% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
压力测试中没有发现特别的异常。使用 FurMark 和 Prime95 工具满负荷运行一小时后，CPU 达到约 70 °C（158 °F）。赛博朋克测试也是如此。
发言人
ZenBook S 16 的音质高于平均水平，特别是考虑到其较低的高度。不过，低音和最大音量应该更强、更大，以获得更好的音质评价。
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
能源消耗
AI 9 365 比 HX 370 更经济。空闲模式下的能耗为 6 至 13 瓦，负载模式下的能耗为 44 至 58 瓦，能效相当可观。Core Ultra 7 系统在空闲模式下能耗较低，而在负载情况下能耗较高。
| Off / Standby | 0.6 / 0.6 Watt |
| Idle | 6 / 7 / 13 Watt |
| Load |
44 / 58 Watt |
   
| |
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M | Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -7% | 16% | -2% | 14% | -52% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6 | 5.4 10% | 3.6 40% | 5 17% | 3.7 38% | 7.03 ? -17% |
| Idle Average * | 7 | 10.5 -50% | 5.7 19% | 6.2 11% | 7.2 -3% | 11.3 ? -61% |
| Idle Maximum * | 13 | 10.9 16% | 6.1 53% | 14.7 -13% | 8.7 33% | 13.8 ? -6% |
| Load Average * | 44 | 47.8 -9% | 52.5 -19% | 49.9 -13% | 44.1 -0% | 72.9 ? -66% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 44.6 | 49.2 -10% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 58 | 58.6 -1% | 64.7 -12% | 65 -12% | 58.2 -0% | 120.4 ? -108% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 46.7 | |||||
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.6 | 54.5 | 50.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Energy consumption with external Monitor
电池寿命
内置 78 Wh 电池的运行时间绝对不差。在亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 的情况下，通过无线局域网上网的时间不到 12 小时，是测试领域最有价值的产品。更昂贵的 ZenBook S 16则少用了一个多小时。
| Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 78 Wh | Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 78 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 76 Wh | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 52.5 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -11% | -11% | -36% | -9% | -16% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 722 | 640 -11% | 644 -11% | 459 -36% | 658 -9% | 604 ? -16% |
| H.264 | 1204 | 1144 | 788 ? | |||
| Load | 107 | 100 | 116 | 56 | 97.7 ? | |
| Reader / Idle | 935 | 1031 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决
如果您对 Ryzen AI 9 365 的性能潜力没有意见 Ryzen AI 9 365或 Radeon 880M）的性能潜力因 TDP 而无法得到充分发挥，那么 ZenBook S 16 UM5606WA 就是一款非常时尚、轻薄的全能型笔记本电脑，适合各种应用。
外观精美的外壳配备了现代化的端口（包括 2x USB 4）和对比度极高、反应灵敏的显示屏--正如我们从 OLED 面板上所了解的那样--尽管其光亮的表面可能会导致恼人的反光。
此外，该笔记本的扬声器性能良好，电池续航时间充裕。我们对部分焊接组件（内存、Wi-Fi）和负载情况下的表面温度印象不深。
每个人都必须自己决定约 1700 欧元（约合 1886 美元）的估计价格是否合理。对我们来说，这个价格往往过高，因为与上一代 CPU/iGPU 相比，性能提升有限。选择更老的设备可能更有意义。
另一方面，英特尔的粉丝们可以在以下设备中找到他们想要的东西 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 16配备 酷睿至尊 7 155H不过，它的价格更高。
价格和供应情况
经测试的华硕 ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA 在多家在线商店有售，价格约为 1,700 欧元（约合人民币 1886 元）（如Playox）。
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击 这里可在此处查阅。
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
-
09/03/2024 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Price comparison
