BOSGAME M1 迷你 PC 评测:Ryzen 7 7840HS 仍是一头猛兽
Bosgame N95 面向预算有限的 HTPC 用户,而 M1 则面向需要更高性能迷你 PC 的办公和电力用户。该机型采用游戏级 Ryzen 7 7840HS CPU,集成 Radeon 780M 显卡、1 TB NVMe SSD 和 32 GB 可移动内存,售价约为 690 美元。M1 的显著特点是集成了立体声扬声器,而绝大多数迷你 PC 都依赖于外置扬声器。
Bosgame M1 的替代产品包括其他 NUC 大小的迷你 PC,如 GMK NucBox K6,英特尔 NUC 13 Pro或 Beelink SER7.
更多 Bosgame 评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | BOSGAME M1 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 766 g | 51 mm | x | ||
78.9 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | GMK NucBox M5 R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 505 g | 48 mm | x | ||
83.6 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | GMK NucBox K6 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 514 g | 47 mm | x | ||
80.8 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 538 g | 37 mm | x | ||
86.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Beelink SER7 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 640 g | 49 mm | x | ||
v (old) | 11 / 2022 | Beelink GTR6 R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | 815 g | 43 mm | x |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
表壳 - 坚固而厚重
除了底部的可拆卸金属板外,机箱的其余部分都是一整块金属,结构坚固,手感可与 NUC 系列媲美。这与 Beelink 的一些设计形成了鲜明对比,后者的顶部采用塑料或网状材料,外观略显廉价。主要缺点是缺少颜色和定制选项,但我们认为这并不影响使用。
虽然 M1 的整体设计最能体现 "NUC 风格",但它实际上比市场上许多其他 NUC 级迷你 PC(包括 NUC 13 Pro 和 M1)更大、更重。 GMK NucBox K6.这部分归因于集成扬声器,而大多数其他迷你 PC 都没有集成扬声器。不过,正如我们下面的性能部分所显示的那样,更宽大的设计也有它的好处。
连接性
作为一款迷你 PC,端口选项丰富多样。M1 上最突出的端口包括全尺寸 DisplayPort 和双 USB-C 4.0 端口,可用于底座友好型系统。需要注意的是,USB-C 端口还兼容高达 100 W 的 Power Delivery;如果您丢失了系统附带的专有交流适配器,则可以使用通用的第三方 USB-C 交流适配器为该机型供电。例如,我们的 135 W USB-C 联想适配器就与博世游戏 M1 兼容。希望制造商能在未来的机型上完全放弃专用的交流电桶适配器,转而使用通用的 USB-C 适配器。
交流
联发科 MT7922 标配 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.2 连接。当与我们的 Wi-Fi 6 或 6E 网络配对时,传输速率既稳定又出色。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox M5 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox M5 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink GTR6 |
维护
维修需要两个步骤,因为主板位于冷却装置和可拆卸底板的下方。幸运的是,只需一把十字螺丝刀就能拆下这两部分。如下图所示,用户可以使用 2 个 SODIMM 插槽、2 个 M.2 2280 PCIe4 x4 插槽和可拆卸 WLAN 模块。
要进入主板的另一侧,需要将主板从机箱中完全取出。因此,清洁主板顶部的第二个风扇比清洁主板下方的第一个风扇要费事得多。
配件和保修
零售包装盒包括一个带螺丝的可拆卸 VESA 支架、HDMI 线缆以及常见的交流适配器和文件。如果在美国购买,制造商提供一年有限保修。
性能 - Radeon 7 7840HS 为迷你 PC 创造奇迹
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。没有预装专门的应用程序,以获得纯净的 Windows 体验。
处理器
年的 Ryzen 7 7840HS依然强大,可与英特尔和 AMD 最新的 Meteor Lake-H 和 Hawk Point-HS CPU 相媲美。处理器 Core Ultra 9 185H中的 Core Ultra 9 185H Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti例如,与我们的 Bosgame 相比,其速度仅快 10%至 15%,性价比较低。
坚持使用较旧的 Ryzen 7 7840HS 将意味着失去集成 NPU 的 Ryzen 7 8840HS或英特尔流星湖系列的集成 NPU。不过,对本地 AI 加速不感兴趣的用户可能会发现 Ryzen 7 7840HS 的优势,因为在非 AI 应用方面,它的性能往往会超过 Ryzen 7 8840HS。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Geekom A8 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (12111 - 13538, n=18) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Geekom A8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (2585 - 2721, n=18) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti | |
Geekom XT12 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
Minisforum Mercury Series EM780 | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (24712 - 28921, n=19) | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (103755 - 123167, n=19) | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (4293 - 5155, n=19) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (105028 - 125820, n=19) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (13857 - 15525, n=19) | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
GMK NucBox M5 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (55540 - 65812, n=19) | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (67389 - 177158, n=19) | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (949 - 1123, n=19) | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (13100 - 15599, n=19) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (17615 - 41516, n=19) | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
压力测试
运行 Prime95 时,CPU 会在最初几秒钟内提升到 4.3 GHz 和 65 W,然后稳定在 4 GHz、54 W 和 80 C。 Beelink SER7上使用完全相同的 Ryzen 7 CPU 会得到非常相似的结果,尽管我们的 M1 明显比 Beelink 更大更重。
运行时 GPU 时钟速率和温度 Witcher 3分别稳定在 2700 MHz 和 67 C,而 Beelink SER7 或 GMK NucBox K6 为 ~2500 MHz。 GMK NucBox K6相比,Beelink SER7 或 GMK NucBox K6 都配备了相同的 AMD 处理器。Bosgame 的 GPU 时钟速率略高,这与下文 GPU 性能部分的图形性能略高有关。
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 35 |
Prime95 压力 | 3.9 | -- | 80 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 4.0 | 833 - 2100 | 70 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~0.8 | 2700 | 67 |
系统性能
PCMark 测试结果可与 GMK NucBox K6 或 Beelink SER7 等其他高端迷你 PC 相媲美。尤其是其数字内容创建子分数,远远高于其他使用旧版 Iris Xe 或 RX Vega 硬件的迷你 PC。
虽然我们在测试设备上没有遇到重大问题,但当蓝牙扬声器正在搜索时,系统启动后每隔一分钟左右就会发出恼人的蜂鸣声。通过蓝牙菜单断开扬声器连接即可停止蜂鸣声。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7039 - 7651, n=8) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10519 - 11214, n=8) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9075 - 10970, n=8) | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox M5 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9052 - 9987, n=8) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1566 - 1891, n=8) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1535 - 1823, n=8) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1556 - 2040, n=8) | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1293 - 1749, n=8) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Beelink SER7 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (297 - 339, n=8) | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (248 - 319, n=7) | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
GMK NucBox M5 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (485 - 544, n=8) | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7198 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30937 - 72158, n=19) | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Beelink SER7 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30497 - 62147, n=19) | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
GMK NucBox M5 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Beelink SER7 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (34590 - 93323, n=19) | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
GMK NucBox M5 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
GMK NucBox M5 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (85.1 - 112, n=19) | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Beelink GTR6 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签页时,LatencyMon 仅显示出轻微的 DPC 问题。但遗憾的是,以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频并不完美,在 60 秒的时间跨度内记录到 11 次丢帧。鉴于 Zen 4 CPU 的强大性能,理想情况下应该不会出现掉帧现象。事实证明,基于英特尔处理器的 PC 在视频回放方面始终更胜一筹。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
GMK NucBox M5 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Beelink GTR6 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配备了中端 金士顿 OM8SEP41024N-A0PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘,传输速率约为 4000 MB/s,而高端 PCIe4 硬盘的传输速率大于 6500 MB/s。虽然我们永远不会拒绝速度更快的硬盘,但金士顿硬盘与这一特定处理器级别和目标价格范围搭配得很好。
硬盘配有散热垫,可将热量散发到底盖下方的金属风扇装置上。不过,如果安装第二块固态硬盘,则需要自备散热垫。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox M5 | |
Beelink SER7 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M是目前速度最快的集成 GPU 之一,与大多数笔记本电脑相比,它在迷你 PC 平台上的速度更快。在这种情况下,Bosgame 中的 iGPU 比使用相同 Radeon 780M 的普通笔记本电脑快 15%-20%。这一差距足以媲美甚至略胜于运行以下平台的最新微型电脑英特尔 Arc 8如更昂贵的 Acemagic F2A.
3DMark 11 Performance | 13985 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 39559 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8156 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3517 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能--Playstation 4 级图形处理器
上述出色的 3DMark 分数在实际游戏中得到了很好的体现,因为 Bosgame M1 在所有测试游戏中的帧率都高于平均水平。这款迷你 PC 的性能足以在 1080p 中等设置下以稳定的 30 FPS 运行《赛博朋克 2077:魅影自由》,或在 1080p 高设置下以稳定的 60 FPS 运行《F1 22》。因此,自适应同步显示器与 Bosgame 搭配使用,可以很好地满足游戏需求。
从旧版 Iris Xe 96 EUs电脑的用户可以获得 2 倍以上的游戏性能。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Beelink GTR6 -1! | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK -2! | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Beelink GTR6 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Beelink SER7 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK | |
GMK NucBox M5 |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (30.7 - 67.4, n=14) | |
GMK NucBox M5 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (20.2 - 43.9, n=22) | |
GMK NucBox M5 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (15.7 - 36.8, n=24) | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (13.8 - 29.9, n=24) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
BOSGAME M1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (13.4 - 29.2, n=23) |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 160.7 | 103.8 | 52.2 | 33.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 159.5 | 126.5 | 98.8 | 88.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 84.5 | 40.9 | 30.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 64.2 | 46.3 | 38.7 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 88 | 54 | 49 | 47 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 175.9 | 70.9 | 60.6 | 52.1 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 77.7 | 55.9 | 37.9 | 30.3 |
F1 22 (2022) | 109.9 | 95 | 70.6 | 19.2 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 43.9 | 36.8 | 29.9 | 29.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 47.9 | 37.5 | 29.6 | 25.8 |
排放量
系统噪音 - 可听到,但不会过于响亮
该机型集成了两个风扇,一个位于主板顶部,另一个位于底部。无论屏幕负载如何,风扇始终处于活动状态,在运行浏览或视频流等要求不高的负载时,风扇会发出低至 32 分贝(A)的嗡嗡声。这是大多数迷你 PC 的典型特点,我们很高兴看到 M1 的风扇通常很安静,没有恼人的脉动。
在运行游戏等较高负载时,风扇噪音稳定在 42 dB(A)。这比 GMK NucBox K6和 Beelink SER7 的噪音都要小。我们并不觉得风扇噪音大到令人烦恼的程度,尤其是用户更有可能坐在离迷你 PC 比笔记本电脑更远的地方。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 32 / 32 / 32 dB(A) |
Load |
| 38.7 / 42 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) |
BOSGAME M1 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS | GMK NucBox M5 Vega 8, R7 5700U, Lexar 1024GB LNM6A1X001T-HNNNG | GMK NucBox K6 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000 | Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Beelink SER7 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | Beelink GTR6 Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston KC3000 512G SKC3000S512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 2% | -6% | -3% | 11% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 23.2 | 23.4 -1% | 23.2 -0% | 29.8 -28% | 24.5 -6% | 23.2 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 32 | 33.8 -6% | 31.3 2% | 30.2 6% | 25.1 22% | 23.6 26% |
Idle Average * | 32 | 33.8 -6% | 31.3 2% | 31.1 3% | 25.1 22% | 23.8 26% |
Idle Maximum * | 32 | 33.8 -6% | 33.4 -4% | 31.9 -0% | 25.1 22% | 36.2 -13% |
Load Average * | 38.7 | 36.5 6% | 47.5 -23% | 40 -3% | 35.9 7% | 39.7 -3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.7 | 36.8 12% | 43.6 -5% | 35.6 15% | 41 2% | |
Load Maximum * | 42 | 36.9 12% | 47.7 -14% | 40.5 4% | 45.4 -8% | 43 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
如下图所示,设备正面和背面的表面温度最高。新鲜空气从顶部进入,而废热则从后部排出。因此,不建议在设备顶部放置物品,因为这样会阻碍气流。
GMK NucBox K6 的设计可以说在温度控制方面更加方便用户。GMK 系统不是从顶部表面抽取空气,而是通过两侧的缝隙抽取空气。与 Bosgame M1 设计相比,这种方法允许更多的定位自由。
发言人
集成的 26 毫米立体声扬声器使 M1 有别于其他大多数微型电脑。例如,如果您的空间有限或简约,那么您可以直接使用集成扬声器,而无需依赖外部解决方案。
遗憾的是,由于集成扬声器的音质一般、音量一般,而且有轻微的音频延迟,因此它更像是一个 "B 计划 "解决方案。它们必须通过蓝牙与 Windows 配对,与外置 3.5 毫米扬声器相比,我们可以注意到半秒的延迟。在播放音乐和大多数休闲视频时,这种延迟可以忽略不计,但在运行游戏或观看视频时,我们肯定会注意到语音不能完全同步。
同时,音质和音量也没有什么特别之处。有些笔记本电脑(如惠普 Spectre x360 16)的集成扬声器比 Bosgame M1 更大、更清晰。对于办公室或会议室来说,M1 扬声器已经足够出色,但对于客厅 HTPC 环境来说,它们缺乏震撼力。
BOSGAME M1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 40%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
在台式机上空转时的平均功耗不到 9 瓦,比 Beelink SER7 和 GMK NucBox K6 稍高几瓦。不过,在运行游戏时,Bosgame 的平均功耗要高出几瓦,这可能是由于前面提到的 Radeon 780M 采用了更高的主频。
当 CPU 使用率达到 100%时,我们可以记录到中等大小(约 13.9 x 6.3 x 3.5 厘米)的 120 瓦交流适配器的最大功耗为 99 瓦。在连接外部 USB 设备或硬盘时,这部分开销将派上用场。
Off / Standby | 1.1 / 1.4 Watt |
Idle | 7.3 / 7.3 / 8.4 Watt |
Load |
72.7 / 99.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
BOSGAME M1 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, , , x, | GMK NucBox M5 R7 5700U, Vega 8, Lexar 1024GB LNM6A1X001T-HNNNG, , x, | GMK NucBox K6 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000, , x, | Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, , x, | Beelink SER7 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | Beelink GTR6 R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M, Kingston KC3000 512G SKC3000S512G, , x, | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 43% | 7% | 5% | -1% | -4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.3 | 5.9 19% | 6.7 8% | 5.1 30% | 6.7 8% | 7.6 -4% |
Idle Average * | 7.3 | 6.2 15% | 7 4% | 5.8 21% | 7.3 -0% | 9.9 -36% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.4 | 6.4 24% | 7.6 10% | 10.2 -21% | 11.6 -38% | 10.6 -26% |
Load Average * | 72.7 | 28.2 61% | 74.3 -2% | 68.1 6% | 64.1 12% | 64 12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 80.5 | 27.5 66% | 75 7% | 75.8 6% | 69 14% | |
Load Maximum * | 99.1 | 29.5 70% | 85.7 14% | 108.3 -9% | 94.8 4% | 80.4 19% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
Pros
Cons
结论 - 即使没有集成扬声器也是不错的选择
集成立体声扬声器是 Bosgame M1 的独特卖点。虽然在没有外置扬声器的情况下,它们肯定会很方便,但对于办公室或会议室以外的用途来说,它们的音质还有待提高。如果要播放多媒体或在较大的房间里,最好还是使用外置扬声器。
幸运的是,M1 在其他方面都表现出色。全金属机身质量上乘,通过多个 USB-C 4.0 端口实现了出色的连接性,维修相对简单,性能也比预期的要快。休闲游戏玩家会喜欢它能在 1080p 下运行大多数游戏,而硬核游戏玩家则会欣赏它对 eGPU 的支持。考虑到它满载 32 GB 内存、1 TB 存储空间和 Windows 11 Pro 许可证,低于 700 美元的价位也相当合理。如果有一个简装版,M1 的价格会更低,在与许多 Beelink 的替代产品.
Bosgame M1 是一款强大的 NUC 替代产品,其性能可与基于英特尔的高端产品相媲美。它比大多数产品稍大稍重,但性能和质量足以弥补较大的体积。
除了扬声器有点令人失望之外,它的主要缺点是机箱尺寸稍大、120 W 交流适配器过于笨重,以及在播放 4K60 视频时出现一些掉帧现象。不过,这些都是相对较小的问题,不会影响该机型的整体价值或制造质量。
价格和供应情况
Bosgame M1现已在亚马逊发售,售价 690 美元,配备 32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 和 Windows 11 Pro(已评测)。用户也可以直接从制造商处购买https://www.bosgamepc.com/products/pre-order-bosgame-ryzen-7-mini-pc-7840hs以相同的价格购买。
BOSGAME M1
- 05/25/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.