
惠普 Envy x360 15 Core Ultra 7 可折叠电脑评测:令人失望的价格
与它的功能相比,太贵了。
Envy x360 15 是惠普的中端可折叠产品,但考虑到 1200 美元的售价,它给人的感觉过于简陋。虽然有些方面值得称赞,但却少之又少,而该系列的竞争对手却能提供更多。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
结论--廉价显示器配老式处理器
最新的 Envy x360 15 采用较便宜的 1080p 面板,售价为 1000 美元,而采用 1080p 全 sRGB 面板的售价为 1250 美元。除非你真的很看重可转换设计,否则像联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 这样的 15 英寸夹层式笔记本电脑将是你的不二之选。 联想 IdeaPad Slim 5或 戴尔 Inspiron 15 Plus 能提供更快的图形处理性能和更高质量的显示屏,但价格却要便宜数百美元。即使是较老的 华硕 ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U 也是速度更快、价格更低的替代品,而重量却几乎与惠普完全相同。这部分归功于酷睿至尊 7 U 系列处理器,不幸的是,该处理器基于较旧的流星湖平台,而不是月亮湖平台。因此,除非你能找到超低折扣的配置,否则功能和性价比都会有所欠缺。
这并不是说新款 Envy x360 15 是一款糟糕的可转换设备,因为它的金属设计、舒适的按键和体面的端口选项对于一款中端系统来说是值得尊敬的。不过,考虑到超过 1000 美元的起售价,为了跟上竞争对手的步伐,全 sRGB 显示屏应该成为标配,而 CPU 则应该换成更高效的酷睿 Ultra 7 V 系列。
Pros
Cons
Envy x360 15 是惠普介于低端 x360 系列和 Envy x360 15 之间的中端多媒体可转换产品。 Pavilion x360 系列和高端 Spectre x360 系列之间。.2025 年初的最新机型将旧机型上的 Raptor Lake-U 处理器换成了更新的 Meteor Lake-U 处理器,其他大部分配置保持不变。
我们的测试机是中间配置,配备酷睿至尊 7 155U、16 GB LPDDR5 内存和 15.6 英寸 1080p IPS 触摸屏,售价约为 1250 美元。其他配置可能包括速度较慢的酷睿 7 150U CPU 或不同的 1080p 面板。
Envy x360 15 的替代产品包括其他中端可转换产品,如 华硕 Vivobook Flip或 联想 Flex 系列.
更多惠普评测:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
连接性
SD 读卡器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng |
交流
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
网络摄像头
标配 500 万像素网络摄像头以及红外和物理隐私快门。

维护
由于底板四周用夹子固定得非常紧,因此维修起来比较困难。小心不要意外损坏或弯曲机箱。
用户可以使用一个 M.2 2280 固态硬盘插槽和可拆卸的 WLAN 模块,同时对内存进行焊接。
可持续性
该模型的制造使用了海洋塑料、消费后再生塑料和再生金属。包装主要为纸张和纸板,外加塑料保护膜。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外,没有其他附件。如果在美国购买,制造商通常提供一年有限保修。
输入设备
键盘和触摸板
打字体验与 2023 型号因为按键反馈、点击板大小甚至辅助功能都没有变化。也许区分 2025 型与旧款最简单的方法就是右下方新增加的 Co-Pilot 键,它取代了其中一个标点符号键或 Ctrl 键。
显示屏 - 色彩有限的廉价 IPS
|
Brightness Distribution: 77 %
Center on Battery: 331.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1837:1 (Black: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.08 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 2.73
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
44.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl CMN155D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng Samsung SDC416C, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 LEN153WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3", 60 Hz | LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Samsung ATNA56YX08-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | Dell Inspiron 15 Plus Dell INSPIRON LGD06A6, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Samsung SDC4180, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 98% | 62% | 104% | 49% | 103% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 42.6 | 96.43 126% | 70.4 65% | 99.8 134% | 64.1 50% | 99.93 135% |
sRGB Coverage | 63.7 | 98.82 55% | 99.6 56% | 100 57% | 92.8 46% | 100 57% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.1 | 93.76 113% | 72.3 64% | 98.09 122% | 66.2 50% | 95.52 117% |
Response Times | 89% | -15% | 92% | -1% | 92% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32 ? | 3 ? 91% | 39.7 ? -24% | 2 ? 94% | 31.6 ? 1% | 2 ? 94% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20.9 ? | 3 ? 86% | 22.2 ? -6% | 2 ? 90% | 21.6 ? -3% | 2 ? 90% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 240 | ||||
Screen | 46% | 26% | 39% | -14% | 138% | |
Brightness middle | 330.7 | 380.2 15% | 311 -6% | 395 19% | 298 -10% | 370.4 12% |
Brightness | 292 | 381 30% | 310 6% | 392 34% | 285 -2% | 376 29% |
Brightness Distribution | 77 | 98 27% | 94 22% | 97 26% | 86 12% | 96 25% |
Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.05 72% | 0.14 22% | 0.1 44% | 0.4 -122% | 0.02 89% |
Contrast | 1837 | 7604 314% | 2221 21% | 3950 115% | 745 -59% | 18520 908% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.08 | 4.68 8% | 2.7 47% | 2.2 57% | 3.68 28% | 1.51 70% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.95 | 7.06 61% | 6.1 66% | 4.43 75% | 7.39 59% | 2.89 84% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.73 | 3.79 -39% | 1 63% | 4.65 -70% | 2.61 4% | 3.36 -23% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 6.62 -70% | 4.3 -10% | 1.78 54% | 5.3 -36% | 2.1 46% |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.18 101% | 2.31 95% | 2.39 92% | 2.102 105% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6607 98% | 7651 85% | 6910 94% | 6284 103% | 6143 106% | 6536 99% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 78% /
64% | 24% /
28% | 78% /
61% | 11% /
1% | 111% /
124% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.1 ms rise | |
↘ 8.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.9 ms rise | |
↘ 16.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8529 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 新名称,老建筑
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和 MyHP 都设置为性能模式。
处理器
酷睿 Ultra 7 155U 酷睿至尊 7 155U速度大约比 酷睿 i7-1355U快大约 25% 到 30%。与此同时,在单线程工作负载时,CPU 实际上要慢 10%左右。归根结底,新旧机型之间的差异并不明显。更糟糕的是,酷睿至尊 7 155U 是基于英特尔较早的流星湖平台,因此它缺乏 Lunar Lake 带来的效率和图形方面的进步。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (7592 - 9829, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1534 - 2382, n=5) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (7048 - 9320, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (34928 - 48070, n=5) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1827 - 2564, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (44936 - 46759, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (4251 - 5883, n=5) | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (17116 - 23999, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (38152 - 48762, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (546 - 755, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (3521 - 4932, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (25065 - 44831, n=5) | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus |
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 51 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.3 | -- | 94 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 0.9 - 1.8 | 800 - 1900 | 90 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力(平衡配置文件) | 0.4 | ~1950 | 76 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力(性能配置文件) | 0.5 | ~1950 | 97 |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (5931 - 6313, n=4) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (10249 - 11088, n=4) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (7994 - 8817, n=4) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (6303 - 7558, n=4) | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (1393 - 1566, n=4) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (1409 - 1529, n=4) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (1451 - 1671, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (1192 - 1382, n=4) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (261 - 286, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (245 - 253, n=4) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (525 - 558, n=4) | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6000 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (36706 - 77717, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (37978 - 64033, n=5) | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (38436 - 63600, n=5) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (123.2 - 253, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配备了中端 三星 PM9C1提供每秒约 5000 MB 的稳定传输速率。更昂贵的笔记本电脑可能会配备三星 PM9A1,它的传输速度更快,可达每秒约 7000 MB。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
综合 Arc 4的性能几乎与较早的Iris Xe 96 EUs.在平衡模式或电池供电模式下运行会影响 CPU 性能,而图形性能则保持不变,如下表Fire Strike 所示。
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 5346 | 19753 | 1999 |
均衡模式 | 5381 (-0%) | 18631 (-6%) | 1800 (-10%) |
电池电量 | 5271 (-1%) | 16355 (-17%) | 1781 (-11%) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7424 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23220 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5052 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2154 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (38.3 - 61.8, n=10) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (24.1 - 32.1, n=9) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (20.4 - 24.4, n=8) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (13.7 - 16.8, n=8) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (11.2 - 13.8, n=8) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 OLED M513UA-L1282W |
Far Cry 5 | |
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ABA7 | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (33 - 51, n=14) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (20 - 28, n=14) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ABA7 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (19 - 26, n=14) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ABA7 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (18 - 23, n=14) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ABA7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | |
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (25.6 - 32.8, n=16) | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (16.7 - 21.6, n=19) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (13.2 - 17.6, n=19) | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 | |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (11.4 - 14.9, n=19) |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 112.1 | 102.7 | 25.5 | 7.14 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 91.2 | 52.6 | 56.1 | 52.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 40.1 | 23.4 | 17.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 36.4 | 28.3 | 24.5 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 42 | 23 | 22 | 20 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 115 | 49.5 | 37 | 29.4 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 29.6 | 23.4 | 16.1 | 12.5 |
F1 22 (2022) | 44.9 | 41 | 29.9 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 17.3 | 14.1 | 12.1 | 12 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 20.5 | 16.6 | 13.3 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.6 / 23.6 / 23.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 23.7 / 45.2 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW | HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 Radeon 680M, R7 7735HS, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G | LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Dell Inspiron 15 Plus GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11400H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | -4% | -18% | -30% | -21% | |
off / environment * | 23.6 | 25.8 -9% | 24.5 -4% | 25.2 -7% | 26 -10% | 25.3 -7% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.6 | 25.8 -9% | 24.5 -4% | 25.2 -7% | 26 -10% | 25.3 -7% |
Idle Average * | 23.6 | 25.8 -9% | 24.5 -4% | 25.2 -7% | 28 -19% | 25.3 -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.6 | 25.8 -9% | 24.5 -4% | 25.2 -7% | 32 -36% | 25.3 -7% |
Load Average * | 23.7 | 27.2 -15% | 35.1 -48% | 43.1 -82% | 47 -98% | 43.5 -84% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 45.8 | 33.1 28% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 45.2 | 40.2 11% | 40.8 10% | 43.3 4% | 48 -6% | 50.75 -12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46 |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+1.8 °C / 3.2 F).
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M | LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Inspiron 15 Plus Intel Core i5-11400H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -18% | 5% | -31% | -36% | -49% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 38 | 37.8 1% | 38.1 -0% | 43.9 -16% | 50 -32% | 51.5 -36% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42 | 43.1 -3% | 36.6 13% | 50.4 -20% | 51 -21% | 62.4 -49% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.4 | 34 -39% | 24.6 -1% | 35.8 -47% | 38 -56% | 41.7 -71% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.8 | 35.1 -31% | 24.9 7% | 37.5 -40% | 36 -34% | 37.2 -39% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
同时运行 Prime95 和 FurMark 时,功耗将在 43 瓦到 65 瓦之间循环,这与我们上面的压力测试观察结果一致。功耗也高于搭载 AMD Radeon- 的更快的 联想 IdeaPad Slim 5的每瓦性能更低。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3" | LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 Plus i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -17% | 16% | -5% | -96% | -50% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 5.98 -76% | 3.1 9% | 4.2 -24% | 9 -165% | 5.73 -69% |
Idle Average * | 8.1 | 6.42 21% | 6.5 20% | 8.9 -10% | 11 -36% | 14.5 -79% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.6 | 12.55 -31% | 6.8 29% | 10.3 -7% | 15 -56% | 15.6 -63% |
Load Average * | 43.2 | 41.7 3% | 46.4 -7% | 47 -9% | 97 -125% | 40.5 6% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 42.1 | 27.1 36% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 46.3 | 29.6 36% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 64.5 | 64.3 -0% | 69.4 -8% | 49 24% | 129 -100% | 94 -46% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 28.2 | 43.8 | 100.1 | 74.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
无线局域网的运行时间还算不错,在平衡功率模式下略微超过 7 小时。
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core, 55 Wh | HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, 70 Wh | LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 Plus i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 56 Wh | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 34% | 101% | 75% | -17% | 19% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 429 | 576 34% | 862 101% | 749 75% | 356 -17% | 510 19% |
Load | 173 | 190 | 74 | 209 | ||
Reader / Idle | 1651 | 528 | ||||
H.264 | 880 | 537 |
笔记本检查评级
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl
- 03/28/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HP Envy x360 15 fe1071cl Intel Core Ultra 7 155U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $112.99 LCDOLED Replacement for HP E... 2. $107.99 LCDOLED Replacement for HP E... 3. $119.99 LCDOLED Replacement for HP E... List Price: 1050 USD | 1.9 kg | 18.3 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
HP Envy x360 15-fe0072ng Intel Core i7-1355U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $112.99 LCDOLED Replacement for HP E... 2. $129.99 LCDOLED Replacement for HP E... 3. $579.00 HP - Envy x360 2-in-1 15.6" ... List Price: 1.099 US Dollar | 1.8 kg | 18.7 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI OLED | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5-15ARP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 680M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $531.93 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i, 15.6... 2. $725.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRL8... 3. $307.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 - Ever... List Price: 649€ | 1.6 kg | 15.6 mm | 15.30" 1920x1200 148 PPI IPS | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,299.00 LG Gram Superslim 15.6" OLED... 2. $1,692.83 LG 15Z90RT-N.APB7U1 15.6" gr... 3. $1,359.00 LG Gram Superslim 15.6" OLED... List Price: 2099 Euro | 990 g | 10.9 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI OLED | |
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus Intel Core i5-11400H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $830.98 Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 L... 2. $599.00 Dell Inspiron 15 Plus 7501 L... 3. $485.00 Dell Inspiron 15 3000 3520 B... List Price: 849 EUR | 1.9 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $787.00 ASUS Vivobook S 15 S5506MA L... 2. $849.99 ASUS Vivobook S 15 Laptop; C... 3. $45.99 Smatree 15.6inch Hard EVA Pr... List Price: 1499 Euro | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" 2880x1620 OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.