Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

惠普 OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 可折叠电脑评测：比预期更轻

兼顾性能与重量。

OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 可能是惠普最轻的 14 英寸可折叠笔记本之一，但它的速度远非最慢。英特尔公司新推出的 Lunar Lake CPU 在便携性和性能之间取得了很好的平衡。
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Convertible / 2-in-1 Laptop / Notebook Lunar Lake Touchscreen

结论--类似幽灵，却没有幽灵的价格

惠普 惠普 Spectre x360 14是我们最喜欢的 14 英寸可转换笔记本电脑之一。遗憾的是，最新机型的零售价接近 2000 美元，这可能远远超出了大多数用户目前愿意在新笔记本电脑上花费的价格。OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 可以说是下一个最佳选择，因为它继承了 Spectre 机型的很多优点，但价格却便宜了几百美元。120 Hz OLED 触摸屏、英特尔效率极高的 Lunar Lake CPU、优雅的金属设计、清晰的 900 万像素网络摄像头以及出人意料的便携重量，使 OmniBook 与同尺寸的大多数其他产品区别开来。

不过，功能强大的用户可能仍然需要考虑价格更高的 Spectre x360 14 或 OmniBook Ultra 14 Clamshell.为了达到更高的电池续航时间和便携性目标，Lunar Lake 平台牺牲了一些原始性能，而这些都适用于 OmniBook Ultra Flip 14。与 Spectre 或 OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Clamshell 上更坚硬的点击板相比，我们也不喜欢其浅薄和超灵敏的点击板。尽管如此，旅行者和临时编辑可能会从 OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 中发现很多价值，因为他们可以充分利用小尺寸和 120 Hz P3 触摸屏。

Pros

+ 与尺寸相当的图形性能
+ 高分辨率 900 万像素网络摄像头
+ 120 Hz 1800p OLED 面板
+ 可观的电池续航时间
+ 比预期轻

Cons

- 原始处理器性能不佳
- 显示屏亮度有待提高，适合户外使用
- 点击反馈较浅
- 固态硬盘可能会节流
- 无 USB-A 端口

价格和供应情况

亚马逊目前正在销售OmniBook Ultra Flip 14，售价 1650 美元。另外，百思买（Best Buy）的该机型售价仅为 1200 美元。

Amazon Logo
$1,641.24
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 2-in-1 Laptop 14.0" Touchscreen 2.8K Display (Intel Ultra 7-256V, 16GB LPDDR5, 1TB PCIe SSD, Backlit KB, Fingerprint, 2 Thunderbolt 4, Win 11 Pro) w/DKZ USB Port Expander
Bestpreis 1899€ nullprozentshop.de
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14-fh0173ng, Atmospheric Blue, Core Ultra 7 258V, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, DE (AW6N3EA#ABD)
2. 1899 € notebooksbilliger.de
3. 1914.96 € notebooksbilliger.at
4. 1952.99 € notebooksbilliger

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Geizhals
Weight
Height
Display
1.
88.7%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘
Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘
32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Bestpreis 1899€ nullprozentshop.de
2. 1899€ notebooksbilliger.de
3. 1914.96€ notebooksbilliger.at
1.3 kg15 mm14.00"
2880x1800
243 PPI
OLED
2.
87.2%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H ⎘
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Bestpreis 2239€ MetaComp
2. 2250.21€ Jacob Elektronik direkt
3. 2268€ HEINZSOFT
1.5 kg14.7 mm14.00"
1920x1200
162 PPI
IPS
3.
85.2%
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Bestpreis 999€ HEINZSOFT
2. 999€ computeruniverse.net
3. 999€ Cyberport.at
1.6 kg16.64 mm14.00"
1920x1200
162 PPI
IPS
4.
88.3% v7 (old)
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U ⎘
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘
32 GB Memory
Bestpreis 2299.45€ F&M
2. 2299.46€ Jacob Elektronik direkt
3. 2299.48€ Future-X.de
1.6 kg16.28 mm14.00"
2560x1600
216 PPI
IPS
5.
86.5% v7 (old)
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H ⎘
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB NVMe		Listenpreis 1299€
Geizhals Suche		1.4 kg15.9 mm14.00"
2880x1800
243 PPI
OLED
6.
86.1% v7 (old)
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT
Intel Core i7-1260P ⎘
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Bestpreis 1389.9€ ITboost.de
2. 2098.5€ AS-SELL
1.6 kg17.9 mm14.00"
2880x1800
243 PPI
IPS

Table of Contents

  1. 结论--类似幽灵，却没有幽灵的价格
  2. 规格
  3. 案例
  4. 连接性
  5. 输入设备
  6. 显示屏
  7. 性能
  8. 排放量
  9. 能源管理
  10. 笔记本检查评级

OmniBook Ultra 14 Flip 是 OmniBook Ultra 14 Clamshell 的可转换版本。 OmniBook Ultra 14 Clamshell.尽管它们的名字相似，但内外却有许多不同之处，甚至包括处理器的选择也大相径庭。

我们的测试机是高端配置，配备酷睿 Ultra 7 258V Lunar Lake 处理器、16 GB 焊接内存和 1800p OLED 触摸屏，售价约为 1600 美元，如果打折则为 1200 美元。此外，还有性能较低的 Core Ultra 7 256V 版本，但所有选项均配备相同的 OLED 面板。

该领域的竞争对手包括其他高端 14 英寸可折叠电脑，如 微星 Summit E14 Flip Evo, 华硕 ZenBook Flip 14或 联想 Yoga 7 2 合 1 14IML9.

更多惠普评测：

规格

HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (OmniBook Ultra Flip Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V 8 x 2.2 - 4.8 GHz, 39 W PL2 / Short Burst, 29 W PL1 / Sustained, Lunar Lake
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Core: 1950 MHz, 32.0.101.5730
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5x-8533, soldered
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, 10-point capacitive, native pen support, Samsung SDC41AA, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Lunar Lake SOC - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, MAgnetometer, IR
Networking
Intel BE201 320MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15 x 314 x 216
Battery
64 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 6-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1440p30
Primary Camera: 9 MPix Temporal noise reduction
Additional features
Speakers: Quad, Poly Studio, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, MyHP, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.336 kg, Power Supply: 335 g
Price
1250 USD
Amazon
$1,641.24
Links
HP homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

案例

机身主要由光滑的铝合金组成，给人的第一印象与 OmniBook Ultra 蛤壳式或 Spectre x360 14.它甚至采用了后者的 "钻石切割 "后角设计。

该机型最令人惊讶的地方可能就是它的轻薄。该系统的便携性超过了许多同类产品，包括联想 Yoga 7 2 合 1 14、华硕 ZenBook Flip 14 或戴尔 9450 2 合 1 14。 戴尔Latitude 9450 2 合 1.

尺寸比较

❌
317.72 mm 222.13 mm 16.64 mm 1.6 kg314 mm 227.5 mm 17.9 mm 1.6 kg314 mm 216 mm 15 mm 1.3 kg313.9 mm 219.9 mm 14.7 mm 1.5 kg311.2 mm 222.5 mm 15.9 mm 1.4 kg310.5 mm 215 mm 16.28 mm 1.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性

与 EliteBook x360 1040 G11 不同，EliteBook x360 1040 G11 只有 USB-C 端口。所有端口都兼容充电和视频输出，但只有两个端口兼容 Thunderbolt 4 设备。

正面无端口
正面无端口
右：2x USB-C (40 Gbps) w/ Thunderbolt 4 + Power Delivery + DisplayPort 2.1
右：2x USB-C (40 Gbps) w/ Thunderbolt 4 + Power Delivery + DisplayPort 2.1
后部无端口
后部无端口
左：USB-C（10 Gbps），带 Power Delivery + DisplayPort 1.4，3.5 毫米耳机
左：USB-C（10 Gbps），带 Power Delivery + DisplayPort 1.4，3.5 毫米耳机

交流

英特尔 BE201 标配 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4 连接。该机型缺乏广域网或 5G 支持，无法与价格更高的 Elite 系列区分开来。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1395 (727min - 1572max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1578 (812min - 1670max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1253 (724min - 1614max) MBit/s +87%
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1188 (769min - 1340max) MBit/s +77%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
908 (834min - 982max) MBit/s +35%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel BE201 320MHz
671 (399min - 902max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1427 (1249min - 1561max) MBit/s +85%
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1383 (1305min - 1432max) MBit/s +79%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
847 (792min - 868max) MBit/s +10%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel BE201 320MHz
771 (636min - 833max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT
Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)
1466 (1265min - 1523max) MBit/s +33%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1408 (1281min - 1531max) MBit/s +28%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel BE201 320MHz
1103 (1022min - 1162max) MBit/s
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1054 (809min - 1164max) MBit/s -4%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1049 (742min - 1160max) MBit/s -5%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1486 (1312min - 1573max) MBit/s +6%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel BE201 320MHz
1399 (1036min - 1456max) MBit/s
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1387 (1264min - 1447max) MBit/s -1%
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT
Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)
1296 (1250min - 1330max) MBit/s -7%
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1214 (1067min - 1408max) MBit/s -13%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450Tooltip
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1103 (1022-1162)
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1399 (1036-1456)

网络摄像头

与联想或戴尔的大多数竞争对手相比，900 万像素网络摄像头能生成更清晰的图像。不过，色彩仍然不是最准确的。

红外和实体网络摄像头快门均为标配。

ColorChecker
7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
18 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
17 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
ColorChecker HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14: 9.7 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 17.99 ∆E

维护

底部面板仅用四颗 Torx 螺钉固定，便于维修。不过，只有电池和 M.2 固态硬盘是可拆卸的，因为 WLAN 和内存模块是焊接的。

OmniBook Ultra 4 Flip 内部结构
OmniBook Ultra 4 Flip 内部结构

可持续性

扬声器和边框采用海洋塑料制造，外盖则由回收金属制成。键盘的一部分也是用消费后回收塑料制造的。

包装完全可回收，几乎不含塑料。

配件和保修

零售包装盒内除了常规的文件和 USB-C 交流适配器外，还包括一支有源手写笔。如果在美国购买，制造商提供一年有限保修。

输入设备

键盘

键盘布局与 OmniBook Ultra 14 Clamshell基本相同的输入体验。

触摸板

光滑的点击板比 OmniBook Ultra 14 Clamshell 的更宽敞（13.9 x 8.8 厘米对 12.5 x 8 厘米），可以更舒适地进行多点触摸输入。不过，行程很浅，反馈相对较弱，而且声音较小，手感并不令人满意。

键盘与翻盖机型相同，但点击板更大
键盘与翻盖机型相同，但点击板更大

显示屏

RGB OLED 子像素阵列
RGB OLED 子像素阵列

这里的 OLED 面板支持 120 Hz 的快速原生刷新率，而华硕 ZenBook Flip 14 和微星 Summit E14 Flip 分别只有 90 Hz 和 60 Hz。动态刷新率（DRR）也支持低至 48 Hz，我们建议在玩大多数 3D 游戏时采用这种刷新率，以减少画面撕裂。

在 SDR 模式下，最大亮度约为 363 尼特；在 HDR 模式下，最大亮度约为 585 尼特。

边对边玻璃触摸屏
边对边玻璃触摸屏
窄边框
窄边框
367.9
cd/m²		364.1
cd/m²		366.3
cd/m²
364.4
cd/m²		363.9
cd/m²		366.3
cd/m²
366.6
cd/m²		366.7
cd/m²		368.4
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Samsung SDC41AA tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 368.4 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 366.1 cd/m² Minimum: 19.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 363.9 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 0.82
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
96.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Samsung SDC41AA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz		HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
CMN1474, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz		Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz		Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 60 Hz		Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W
SDC4154, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz		MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT
AU Optronics B140QAN04.R, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 60 Hz
Display
-19%
-51%
-12%
1%
-4%
Display P3 Coverage
99.8
69
-31%
41.6
-58%
80.6
-19%
99.7
0%
97.8
-2%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.2
-1%
62.1
-38%
100
0%
100
0%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
96.7
71.1
-26%
43
-56%
80.1
-17%
98.6
2%
85.9
-11%
Response Times
-4688%
-2394%
-5128%
-116%
-1645%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.86 ?(0.46, 0.4)
54.5 ?(24.4, 30.1)
-6237%
25.7 ?(12, 13.7)
-2888%
59.6 ?(27.8, 31.8)
-6830%
2 ?(1, 1)
-133%
16.9 ?(7.3, 9.6)
-1865%
Response Time Black / White *
1.01 ?(0.46, 0.55)
32.7 ?(16.1, 16.6)
-3138%
20.2 ?(11.3, 8.9)
-1900%
35.6 ?(17, 18.6)
-3425%
2 ?(1, 1)
-98%
15.4 ?(7.3, 8.1)
-1425%
PWM Frequency
469 ?(100)
Screen
-47%
-234%
-47%
-98%
-142%
Brightness middle
363.9
351.3
-3%
335.1
-8%
501.4
38%
366
1%
496.7
36%
Brightness
366
328
-10%
321
-12%
491
34%
369
1%
468
28%
Brightness Distribution
99
86
-13%
91
-8%
88
-11%
96
-3%
87
-12%
Black Level *
0.24
0.31
0.32
0.3
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.84
2.29
-173%
5.05
-501%
2.52
-200%
2.84
-238%
3.93
-368%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.72
4.55
-67%
18.98
-598%
4.87
-79%
5.29
-94%
7.9
-190%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.82
0.49
40%
2.11
-157%
0.45
45%
2.81
-243%
1.27
-55%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.1
2.2
-100%
5
-355%
2.8
-155%
2.32
-111%
5.9
-436%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.13 103%
2.16 102%
2.17 101%
2.44 90%
2.04 108%
CCT
6330 103%
6321 103%
6436 101%
6270 104%
6170 105%
7618 85%
Contrast
1464
1081
1567
1656
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1585% / -813%
-893% / -548%
-1729% / -885%
-71% / -76%
-597% / -358%

* ... smaller is better

对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3

尽管面板支持完整的 DCI-P3 色彩，但色彩预设为 sRGB。此外，灰阶和色彩的平均 DeltaE 值均低于 2，准确性非常出色。

校准前的灰度
校准前的灰度
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的 ColorChecker
校准前的 ColorChecker
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的 ColorChecker
校准后的 ColorChecker

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.46 ms rise
↘ 0.55 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.86 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.46 ms rise
↘ 0.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 469 Hz
Amplitude: 33.3 %		 ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 469 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 469 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8529 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

100% 亮度
100% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
0% 亮度
0% 亮度

室外能见度尚可，但比戴尔Latitude 9450 2 合 1 差，后者采用了更亮的 OLED 面板。

户外阳光下
户外阳光下
室外阴凉处
室外阴凉处
户外阳光下
户外阳光下
宽广的 OLED 视角
宽广的 OLED 视角

性能

 
 

测试条件

除非另有说明，否则在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 MyHP 设置为性能模式。

处理器

处理器性能不错，但并不出色，因为 Lunar Lake 强调的是每瓦性能而不是原始功率。处理器 酷睿至尊 7 258V与旧款 酷睿至尊 7 165U这足以满足与办公、浏览和偶尔的视频编辑相关的目标应用。

选择较低的 酷睿至尊 7 256V配置预计不会影响处理器性能。 XPS 13 9350.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V: Ø1516 (1489.04-1656.18)
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Intel Core Ultra 7 165H: Ø1922 (1713.06-2466.7)
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125U: Ø1376 (1332.89-1657.28)
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U: Ø1494 (1433.95-1667.01)
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1823 (1806.36-1838.74)
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1384 (1302.3-1394.12)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
HP OmniBook Ultra 14
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
87.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
80.9 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
78.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE
Intel Core i7-1370P
71.7 pt
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
68.4 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
 
62.1 pt
Dell XPS 13 9350
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
62 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
60 pt
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
59.6 pt
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
59 pt
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT -2!
Intel Core i7-1260P
56.5 pt
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8
AMD Ryzen 5 7540U
55.8 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U
53.2 pt
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
52.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE
AMD Ryzen 5 7535U
45.5 pt
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1656 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
135.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
262 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4071 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
644 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1664 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
10416 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
107.8 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
503 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
90 pt
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core
86.7 pt
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
73 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
 
69.5 pt
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core
64.8 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core
60.6 pt
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
50.4 pt

压力测试

系统空闲
系统空闲

在性能模式下启动 Prime95 时，CPU 的主频将升至 3.5 GHz，功耗为 38 W，大约 20 秒后达到 99 C。如果在平衡模式下运行，CPU 会降至 2.8 GHz、22 W 和 79 C。

运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，核心温度将稳定在 78 摄氏度，而 Elite x360 1040 G40 的核心温度为 95 摄氏度。 Elite x360 1040 G11 2 合 1相比，运行速度较慢的 Arc 8 显卡时，Elite x360 1040 G11 2-in-1 的核心温度为 95 C。

Prime95 应力（平衡模式）
Prime95 应力（平衡模式）
Prime95 压力（性能模式）
Prime95 压力（性能模式）
赛博朋克 2077》压力
赛博朋克 2077》压力
Prime95+FurMark 压力
Prime95+FurMark 压力
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) GPU 时钟 (MHz) CPU 平均温度 (°C)
系统闲置 -- -- 36
Prime95 压力（平衡模式） 2.8 -- 79
Prime95 压力（性能模式） 3.3 -- 88
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 2.5 1150 81
赛博朋克 2077》压力 1.7 1950 78

系统性能

PCMark 测试结果非常出色，只有生产力得分略低，这与处理器性能一般有关。由于 Lunar Lake 采用了独特的封装式内存设计，AIDA64 内存得分非常高。

PCMark 10 标准
PCMark 10 标准
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 165H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
6983 Points +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (6265 - 7314, n=12)
6908 Points +10%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6265 Points
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U
6156 Points -2%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W
Vega 8, R7 5800H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
6053 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL8512HDLU
6052 Points -3%
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5384 Points -14%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
6265 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
108544 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  (107682 - 109035, n=12)
108390 MB/s 0%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core
88831 MB/s -18%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core
84739 MB/s -22%
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core
82195 MB/s -24%
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
65595 MB/s -40%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Vega 8
34964 MB/s -68%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

以 60 FPS 的速度播放 4K 视频非常流畅，没有任何掉帧记录。

4K60 视频播放测试
4K60 视频播放测试

存储设备

我们的设备配有 三星 PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLBPCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘，理论传输速率超过 7000 MB/s。不幸的是，这款硬盘在保持这样的速度方面存在问题，因此实际性能会比较慢，下面的 DiskSpd 循环测试结果就是例证。微星 微星 Prestige 16 B1MG的固态硬盘运行速度要快得多。

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7046 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5247 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 436.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 365.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2426 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2462 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 62.94 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 111.2 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
90.4 pt
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
66.1 pt
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
59.1 pt
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
 
56.5 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL8512HDLU
55.4 pt
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
40.4 pt

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4665 (3164.77-6566.68)
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7096 (6683.26-7117.73)

图形处理器性能

集成的图形性能 Arc 140V比即将推出的 弧 8与竞争对手的 Radeon 880M.从旧版 Iris Xe 96 EUs的用户将看到更大的提升。

考虑到 14 英寸可折叠产品的类别，游戏性能还是可圈可点的。博德之门 3》在 1080p 低设置下的平均帧数为 40 FPS，而《赛 博 朋克 2077》在 1080p 中设置下的平均帧数为 36 FPS。即便如此，该系统在设计时并没有考虑到在原生 1800p 分辨率下流畅运行大多数游戏。

如下表Fire Strike 所示，不同功率配置之间的性能差距相对较小。唯一的例外是将系统设置为电池保护模式。

电源配置文件图形分数物理得分综合得分
性能模式9534210923482
智能感应模式9460 (-1%)20598 (-2%)3379 (-3%)
平衡模式9598 (-0%)19994 (-5%)3323 (-5%)
电池保护模式5644 (-41%)12361 (-41%)1729 (-50%)
电池电量9469 (-1%)20697 (-2%)3523 (-0%)
3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
快速通道
快速通道
Time Spy
Time Spy
钢铁游牧民族
钢铁游牧民族
 
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
100 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9
AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
59.7 pt
HP OmniBook Ultra 14
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
57.3 pt
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
 
56.6 pt
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
56.3 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
53.1 pt
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
52.2 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
50.4 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-1370P
48.8 pt
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
31.7 pt
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8
AMD Radeon 740M, AMD Ryzen 5 7540U
30.9 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U
30.7 pt
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
29.1 pt
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
25.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE -1!
AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 7535U
14.9 pt
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 Performance
11337 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
32442 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8733 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4354 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
881 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE
AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 7535U
586 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-1370P
88 Seconds *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
28 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-1370P
150 Seconds *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
50 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE
AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 7535U
728 Seconds * -35%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8
AMD Radeon 740M, AMD Ryzen 5 7540U
687 Seconds * -27%
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U
652 Seconds * -21%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
592 Seconds * -9%
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (509 - 700, n=17)
577 Seconds * -7%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
541 Seconds *
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14IMH9
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
523 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-1370P
472 Seconds * +13%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
451 Seconds * +17%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
406 Seconds * +25%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
337 Seconds * +38%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9
AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
300 Seconds * +45%
HP OmniBook Ultra 14
AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
241 Seconds * +55%
v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U
367 Seconds * -75%
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (210 - 401, n=8)
255 Seconds * -21%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
213 Seconds * -1%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
210 Seconds *
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
208 Seconds * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
Performance Rating - Percent
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
97.5 pt
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
81.9 pt
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT -2!
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
62.4 pt
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
55 pt
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
52.3 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
49.4 pt
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Far Cry 5 | Strange Brigade | F1 22 | Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12)
HP OmniBook Ultra 14
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M
172.1 fps +70%
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (96.9 - 111.4, n=5)
103.9 fps +3%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
101.2 fps
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
84.4 fps -17%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
80 fps -21%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
61.8 fps -39%
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
50.7 fps -50%
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12)
HP OmniBook Ultra 14
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M
86.9 fps +41%
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (56.5 - 72.2, n=4)
65.6 fps +7%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
61.5 fps
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
51.2 fps -17%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
49 fps -20%
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
30.2 fps -51%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12)
HP OmniBook Ultra 14
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M
62.1 fps +24%
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (42.1 - 55.1, n=4)
50.2 fps 0%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
50.1 fps
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
43.4 fps -13%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
39.5 fps -21%
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
22.9 fps -54%
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12)
HP OmniBook Ultra 14
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M
41.2 fps +30%
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (28.2 - 36, n=4)
32.9 fps +3%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
31.8 fps
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
31.6 fps -1%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
27 fps -15%
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
16.1 fps -49%
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12)
HP OmniBook Ultra 14
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M
34.1 fps +27%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
26.8 fps
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (23.6 - 28, n=4)
26.5 fps -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.9 fps -3%
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
21.9 fps -18%
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
12.3 fps -54%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Far Cry 5 | Strange Brigade | F1 22 | Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart

051015202530Tooltip
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V: Ø28 (27-30.6)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 139.5 136 66.1 26.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 116.9 89 82.6 80.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 84.4 46.8 32.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 42.5 39.6 33.3
Far Cry 5 (2018) 78 47 45 39
Strange Brigade (2018) 228 77.8 70.1 62.5
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 61.5 50.1 31.8 26.8
F1 22 (2022) 101 90 66.5 19.6
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 40.2 33.7 30 29.5
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 46.3 36.5 31.8 24.5

排放量

系统噪音

整体噪音小于同类机型，如 Yoga 7 二合一或Latitude 9350 2 合 1。例如，运行3DMark 06 的第一个基准场景时，即使在性能模式下，风扇噪音也会低于 28 dB(A)，在典型的办公环境中几乎听不到。游戏时的风扇噪音也比预期的要小，略低于 34 dB(A)。

风扇噪音曲线（白色：背景，红色：系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：《赛博朋克 2077》，绿色：《赛博朋克 2077》：赛博朋克 2077，绿色：Prime95+FurMark 压力）
风扇噪音曲线（白色：背景，红色：系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：《赛博朋克 2077》，绿色：《赛博朋克 2077》：赛博朋克 2077，绿色：Prime95+FurMark 压力）

Noise Level

Idle
23.2 / 23.2 / 23.2 dB(A)
Load
27.8 / 43.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 22.9 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.336.338.935.638.12527.328.227.82827.5312626.123.924.425.6402321.220.219.921.65022.323.121.925.823.66323.324.929.528.623.98024.226.124.123.625.110024.224.620.320.524.412519.31917.316.520.116020.818.616.514.823.320021.818.516.615.225.725020.817.214.712.425.331520.116.715.414.425.740021.516.814.613.129.15002317.310.610.231.463024.116.99.89.232.880021.414.29.19.430100020.8149.38.929.4125020.314.39.29.329.6160021.715.19.59.530.920002214.89.79.631.2250022.315.410.310.231.231502316.710.710.632.6400022.715.411.21133.2500021.815.711.711.332.9630020.615.211.811.632.9800017.517.711.611.629.51000016.717.311.811.728.61250016.117.711.811.925.31600017.72011.211.319SPL33.62823.222.943.4N1.910.50.44.5median 21.4median 16.8median 11.6median 11.3median 29.5Delta1.31.62.52.43.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB		HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 165H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G		Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL8512HDLU		Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U		Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W
Vega 8, R7 5800H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7		MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Noise
-8%
-1%
-8%
-16%
-3%
off / environment *
22.9
23
-0%
23
-0%
23.9
-4%
26
-14%
23.3
-2%
Idle Minimum *
23.2
23
1%
23
1%
23.9
-3%
26
-12%
23.3
-0%
Idle Average *
23.2
23
1%
23
1%
23.9
-3%
26
-12%
23.3
-0%
Idle Maximum *
23.2
23
1%
23
1%
23.9
-3%
27.3
-18%
23.3
-0%
Load Average *
27.8
31
-12%
29.5
-6%
36.4
-31%
39.8
-43%
24
14%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
33.6
45.7
-36%
36.2
-8%
Load Maximum *
43.4
47.7
-10%
41.3
5%
44.7
-3%
42.4
2%
55.8
-29%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44.7
35.6

* ... smaller is better

温度

键盘和底部两侧的热点温度分别超过 35°C 至 37°C，而 Elite x360 1040 G11 的热点温度为 40°C 至 45°C。 Elite x360 1040 G11.

双后排气管
双后排气管
在运行高负荷时，交流适配器的温度可达 43 摄氏度以上
在运行高负荷时，交流适配器的温度可达 43 摄氏度以上
Max. Load
 32 °C35.2 °C32.8 °C 
 28.4 °C35.8 °C30 °C 
 24.8 °C24.6 °C24.6 °C 
Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 29.8 °C
31 °C37.6 °C31.6 °C
26.2 °C32.2 °C26.6 °C
25.4 °C26.2 °C25.2 °C
Maximum: 37.6 °C
Average: 29.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  46 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.8 °C / 76.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+3.2 °C / 5.8 F).
系统空闲（C 盖）
系统空闲（C 盖）
系统空闲（D 盖）
系统空闲（D 盖）
Prime95+FurMark 强调（C 封面）
Prime95+FurMark 强调（C 封面）
Prime95+FurMark 强调（D 封面）
Prime95+FurMark 强调（D 封面）
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V		HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU		Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)		Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)		Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)		MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
-6%
-12%
-4%
-31%
-2%
Maximum Upper Side *
35.8
39
-9%
38
-6%
35.4
1%
42.7
-19%
44.2
-23%
Maximum Bottom *
37.6
43.6
-16%
39.6
-5%
37.8
-1%
53.1
-41%
45.8
-22%
Idle Upper Side *
25.2
24.4
3%
30
-19%
27.2
-8%
32.9
-31%
19.6
22%
Idle Bottom *
26.6
27.4
-3%
31
-17%
28.2
-6%
35.2
-32%
22
17%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

检查不同音乐类型/电话中内置扬声器的声音（音效、噪音、低音、最大音量......），比较设备类别、特殊功能（软件）......如何连接外部音频设备？测试适当的音频接口。分析粉红噪声图。

短评：分析扬声器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.238.942.2253527.8353134.823.934.84032.120.232.1503621.9366335.929.535.98039.624.139.610049.520.349.512556.717.356.716065.116.565.120067.816.667.825071.114.771.131573.215.473.240075.414.675.450077.810.677.863076.99.876.980078.39.178.3100076.39.376.3125075.69.275.6160076.99.576.9200076.59.776.5250077.610.377.6315078.210.778.240008211.28250007811.778630075.711.875.7800074.111.674.11000078.611.878.61250077.711.877.71600076.211.276.2SPL89.723.289.7N89.90.589.9median 76.5median 11.6median 76.5Delta2.82.52.826.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理

耗电量

由于采用 OLED 面板，系统在桌面上闲置时的功耗在 3 W 到 10 W 之间，具体取决于亮度级别、电源配置文件和屏幕色彩。运行 Prime95 时的功耗比 Elite x360 1040 G11 低约 20%，这与我们的酷睿至尊 7 258V 处理器性能降低 25% 至 30% 的情况相符。

如下面的截图所示，当 CPU 的利用率达到 100% 时，我们可以通过小巧（约 9.6 x 5.3 x 2.1 厘米）的 65 W USB-C 交流适配器暂时记录到最大 65 W 的功率。

3DMark 06 消耗量
3DMark 06 消耗量
赛博朋克 2077》1080p 超高清消费
赛博朋克 2077》1080p 超高清消费
在启动 Prime95 压力时，耗电量会飙升至 62 W，然后由于 Turbo Boost 的限制而下降，20 秒后稳定在 48 W。
在启动 Prime95 压力时，耗电量会飙升至 62 W，然后由于 Turbo Boost 的限制而下降，20 秒后稳定在 48 W。
Prime95+FurMark 在 10 秒处启动应力测试
Prime95+FurMark 在 10 秒处启动应力测试
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.84 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3 / 4.4 / 9.4 Watt
Load midlight 42.3 / 65 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"		Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL8512HDLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"		Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, , IPS, 2560x1600, 14"		Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W
R7 5800H, Vega 8, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"		MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"
Power Consumption
11%
2%
-21%
-54%
-51%
Idle Minimum *
3
1.8
40%
4.2
-40%
3.2
-7%
6.4
-113%
5.4
-80%
Idle Average *
4.4
4.4
-0%
5.7
-30%
6.4
-45%
9.4
-114%
9.5
-116%
Idle Maximum *
9.4
4.5
52%
5.9
37%
10.8
-15%
10.7
-14%
12.4
-32%
Load Average *
42.3
40.7
4%
42.4
-0%
54.6
-29%
52.2
-23%
54.7
-29%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
49.9
54.6
-9%
38.2
23%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
51.1
56.5
-11%
40.5
21%
Load Maximum *
65
66
-2%
64.5
1%
70.2
-8%
69
-6%
63.4
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
35.5
53
52

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test

05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø52.8 (46.9-65)
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø60.9 (52-66.1)
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.55 (3.14-7.98)
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.01 (2.45-6.6)
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø51.1 (47.8-57.5)
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø56.5 (53-63.2)

Power Consumption external Monitor

05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø49.9 (45.5-61.8)
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø60.6 (55.3-66.1)
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø59.4 (58.6-60.6)
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø64.8 (50.7-66.1)
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø37.6 (35.3-51.1)
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø56.2 (49.6-59.6)
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.42 (2.98-5.4)
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø2.51 (1.765-4.85)
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø49.9 (46.8-58.8)
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø54.6 (49.6-57.1)

电池寿命

与其他大多数基于 Lunar Lake 处理器的笔记本电脑一样，这款笔记本电脑的运行时间也非常出色。在自动关机前，我们可以记录将近 14 小时的实际浏览时间，这与我们在性能更强的搭载酷睿 H 处理器的 Elite x360 1040 G11 上看到的情况接近。

从空电到满电大约需要 90 分钟。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
13h 57min
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh		HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11
Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core, 68 Wh		Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9
Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 71 Wh		Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1
Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, 60 Wh		Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W
R7 5800H, Vega 8, 63 Wh		MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 Wh
Battery Runtime
16%
17%
-3%
-38%
-41%
WiFi v1.3
837
969
16%
981
17%
815
-3%
522
-38%
494
-41%
Reader / Idle
3353
2331
1300
1324
Load
99
134
143
124
114
H.264
542

笔记本检查评级

HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 - 11/15/2024 v8
Allen Ngo

Chassis
91 / 98 → 92%
Keyboard
87%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
69 / 74 → 94%
Weight
71 / 20-75 → 93%
Battery
90%
Display
83%
Games Performance
56 / 65 → 86%
Application Performance
81 / 92 → 88%
AI Performance
90%
Temperature
95%
Noise
90%
Audio
86 / 91 → 95%
Camera
52 / 75 → 69%
Average
67%
89%
Convertible - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
84.9%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 41.2%

More articles related to this device

HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (OmniBook Ultra Flip Series)

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 可折叠电脑评测：比预期更轻
Allen Ngo, 2024-11-17 (Update: 2024-11-17)