惠普 OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 可折叠电脑评测:比预期更轻
兼顾性能与重量。
OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 可能是惠普最轻的 14 英寸可折叠笔记本之一,但它的速度远非最慢。英特尔公司新推出的 Lunar Lake CPU 在便携性和性能之间取得了很好的平衡。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
结论--类似幽灵,却没有幽灵的价格
惠普 惠普 Spectre x360 14是我们最喜欢的 14 英寸可转换笔记本电脑之一。遗憾的是,最新机型的零售价接近 2000 美元,这可能远远超出了大多数用户目前愿意在新笔记本电脑上花费的价格。OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 可以说是下一个最佳选择,因为它继承了 Spectre 机型的很多优点,但价格却便宜了几百美元。120 Hz OLED 触摸屏、英特尔效率极高的 Lunar Lake CPU、优雅的金属设计、清晰的 900 万像素网络摄像头以及出人意料的便携重量,使 OmniBook 与同尺寸的大多数其他产品区别开来。
不过,功能强大的用户可能仍然需要考虑价格更高的 Spectre x360 14 或 OmniBook Ultra 14 Clamshell.为了达到更高的电池续航时间和便携性目标,Lunar Lake 平台牺牲了一些原始性能,而这些都适用于 OmniBook Ultra Flip 14。与 Spectre 或 OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Clamshell 上更坚硬的点击板相比,我们也不喜欢其浅薄和超灵敏的点击板。尽管如此,旅行者和临时编辑可能会从 OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 中发现很多价值,因为他们可以充分利用小尺寸和 120 Hz P3 触摸屏。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Geizhals | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | 1.3 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | ||
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Intel Core Ultra 7 165H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | 1.5 kg | 14.7 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | ||
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | 1.6 kg | 16.64 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | ||
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 32 GB Memory | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" 2560x1600 216 PPI IPS | ||
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W AMD Ryzen 7 5800H ⎘ AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB NVMe | Listenpreis 1299€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT Intel Core i7-1260P ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Listenpreis 1600 USD | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS |
OmniBook Ultra 14 Flip 是 OmniBook Ultra 14 Clamshell 的可转换版本。 OmniBook Ultra 14 Clamshell.尽管它们的名字相似,但内外却有许多不同之处,甚至包括处理器的选择也大相径庭。
我们的测试机是高端配置,配备酷睿 Ultra 7 258V Lunar Lake 处理器、16 GB 焊接内存和 1800p OLED 触摸屏,售价约为 1600 美元,如果打折则为 1200 美元。此外,还有性能较低的 Core Ultra 7 256V 版本,但所有选项均配备相同的 OLED 面板。
该领域的竞争对手包括其他高端 14 英寸可折叠电脑,如 微星 Summit E14 Flip Evo, 华硕 ZenBook Flip 14或 联想 Yoga 7 2 合 1 14IML9.
更多惠普评测:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
案例
机身主要由光滑的铝合金组成,给人的第一印象与 OmniBook Ultra 蛤壳式或 Spectre x360 14.它甚至采用了后者的 "钻石切割 "后角设计。
该机型最令人惊讶的地方可能就是它的轻薄。该系统的便携性超过了许多同类产品,包括联想 Yoga 7 2 合 1 14、华硕 ZenBook Flip 14 或戴尔 9450 2 合 1 14。 戴尔Latitude 9450 2 合 1.
连接性
与 EliteBook x360 1040 G11 不同,EliteBook x360 1040 G11 只有 USB-C 端口。所有端口都兼容充电和视频输出,但只有两个端口兼容 Thunderbolt 4 设备。
交流
英特尔 BE201 标配 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4 连接。该机型缺乏广域网或 5G 支持,无法与价格更高的 Elite 系列区分开来。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
网络摄像头
与联想或戴尔的大多数竞争对手相比,900 万像素网络摄像头能生成更清晰的图像。不过,色彩仍然不是最准确的。
红外和实体网络摄像头快门均为标配。
维护
底部面板仅用四颗 Torx 螺钉固定,便于维修。不过,只有电池和 M.2 固态硬盘是可拆卸的,因为 WLAN 和内存模块是焊接的。
可持续性
扬声器和边框采用海洋塑料制造,外盖则由回收金属制成。键盘的一部分也是用消费后回收塑料制造的。
包装完全可回收,几乎不含塑料。
配件和保修
零售包装盒内除了常规的文件和 USB-C 交流适配器外,还包括一支有源手写笔。如果在美国购买,制造商提供一年有限保修。
输入设备
键盘
键盘布局与 OmniBook Ultra 14 Clamshell基本相同的输入体验。
触摸板
光滑的点击板比 OmniBook Ultra 14 Clamshell 的更宽敞(13.9 x 8.8 厘米对 12.5 x 8 厘米),可以更舒适地进行多点触摸输入。不过,行程很浅,反馈相对较弱,而且声音较小,手感并不令人满意。
显示屏
这里的 OLED 面板支持 120 Hz 的快速原生刷新率,而华硕 ZenBook Flip 14 和微星 Summit E14 Flip 分别只有 90 Hz 和 60 Hz。动态刷新率(DRR)也支持低至 48 Hz,我们建议在玩大多数 3D 游戏时采用这种刷新率,以减少画面撕裂。
在 SDR 模式下,最大亮度约为 363 尼特;在 HDR 模式下,最大亮度约为 585 尼特。
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 363.9 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.82
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Samsung SDC41AA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 CMN1474, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 60 Hz | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W SDC4154, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT AU Optronics B140QAN04.R, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -19% | -51% | -12% | 1% | -4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.8 | 69 -31% | 41.6 -58% | 80.6 -19% | 99.7 0% | 97.8 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.2 -1% | 62.1 -38% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.7 | 71.1 -26% | 43 -56% | 80.1 -17% | 98.6 2% | 85.9 -11% |
Response Times | -4688% | -2394% | -5128% | -116% | -1645% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.86 ? | 54.5 ? -6237% | 25.7 ? -2888% | 59.6 ? -6830% | 2 ? -133% | 16.9 ? -1865% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.01 ? | 32.7 ? -3138% | 20.2 ? -1900% | 35.6 ? -3425% | 2 ? -98% | 15.4 ? -1425% |
PWM Frequency | 469 ? | |||||
Screen | -47% | -234% | -47% | -98% | -142% | |
Brightness middle | 363.9 | 351.3 -3% | 335.1 -8% | 501.4 38% | 366 1% | 496.7 36% |
Brightness | 366 | 328 -10% | 321 -12% | 491 34% | 369 1% | 468 28% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 86 -13% | 91 -8% | 88 -11% | 96 -3% | 87 -12% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.3 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.84 | 2.29 -173% | 5.05 -501% | 2.52 -200% | 2.84 -238% | 3.93 -368% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.72 | 4.55 -67% | 18.98 -598% | 4.87 -79% | 5.29 -94% | 7.9 -190% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.82 | 0.49 40% | 2.11 -157% | 0.45 45% | 2.81 -243% | 1.27 -55% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 2.2 -100% | 5 -355% | 2.8 -155% | 2.32 -111% | 5.9 -436% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.13 103% | 2.16 102% | 2.17 101% | 2.44 90% | 2.04 108% |
CCT | 6330 103% | 6321 103% | 6436 101% | 6270 104% | 6170 105% | 7618 85% |
Contrast | 1464 | 1081 | 1567 | 1656 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1585% /
-813% | -893% /
-548% | -1729% /
-885% | -71% /
-76% | -597% /
-358% |
* ... smaller is better
尽管面板支持完整的 DCI-P3 色彩,但色彩预设为 sRGB。此外,灰阶和色彩的平均 DeltaE 值均低于 2,准确性非常出色。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.46 ms rise | |
↘ 0.55 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.86 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.46 ms rise | |
↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 469 Hz Amplitude: 33.3 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 469 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 469 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
室外能见度尚可,但比戴尔Latitude 9450 2 合 1 差,后者采用了更亮的 OLED 面板。
性能
测试条件
除非另有说明,否则在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 MyHP 设置为性能模式。
处理器
处理器性能不错,但并不出色,因为 Lunar Lake 强调的是每瓦性能而不是原始功率。处理器 酷睿至尊 7 258V与旧款 酷睿至尊 7 165U这足以满足与办公、浏览和偶尔的视频编辑相关的目标应用。
选择较低的 酷睿至尊 7 256V配置预计不会影响处理器性能。 XPS 13 9350.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9215 - 12781, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (48758 - 61997, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2271 - 2817, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (49763 - 49796, n=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4319 - 4426, n=3) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (25361 - 32495, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (38049 - 40753, n=3) | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (499 - 630, n=3) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4891 - 6871, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (51458 - 54971, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W |
压力测试
在性能模式下启动 Prime95 时,CPU 的主频将升至 3.5 GHz,功耗为 38 W,大约 20 秒后达到 99 C。如果在平衡模式下运行,CPU 会降至 2.8 GHz、22 W 和 79 C。
运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,核心温度将稳定在 78 摄氏度,而 Elite x360 1040 G40 的核心温度为 95 摄氏度。 Elite x360 1040 G11 2 合 1相比,运行速度较慢的 Arc 8 显卡时,Elite x360 1040 G11 2-in-1 的核心温度为 95 C。
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 36 |
Prime95 压力(平衡模式) | 2.8 | -- | 79 |
Prime95 压力(性能模式) | 3.3 | -- | 88 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.5 | 1150 | 81 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 1.7 | 1950 | 78 |
系统性能
PCMark 测试结果非常出色,只有生产力得分略低,这与处理器性能一般有关。由于 Lunar Lake 采用了独特的封装式内存设计,AIDA64 内存得分非常高。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6265 - 6868, n=3) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9295 - 9729, n=3) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (7357 - 9287, n=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9728 - 9773, n=3) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
CrossMark / Overall | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1623 - 1670, n=3) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1558 - 1615, n=3) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1846 - 1882, n=3) | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1251 - 1302, n=3) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (260 - 279, n=3) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (251 - 264, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (516 - 559, n=3) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6265 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (108544 - 108783, n=3) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (82846 - 89204, n=3) | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (112837 - 117935, n=3) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (95.2 - 98.1, n=3) | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
以 60 FPS 的速度播放 4K 视频非常流畅,没有任何掉帧记录。
存储设备
我们的设备配有 三星 PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLBPCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘,理论传输速率超过 7000 MB/s。不幸的是,这款硬盘在保持这样的速度方面存在问题,因此实际性能会比较慢,下面的 DiskSpd 循环测试结果就是例证。微星 微星 Prestige 16 B1MG的固态硬盘运行速度要快得多。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
集成的图形性能 Arc 140V比即将推出的 弧 8与竞争对手的 Radeon 880M.从旧版 Iris Xe 96 EUs的用户将看到更大的提升。
考虑到 14 英寸可折叠产品的类别,游戏性能还是可圈可点的。博德之门 3》在 1080p 低设置下的平均帧数为 40 FPS,而《赛 博 朋克 2077》在 1080p 中设置下的平均帧数为 36 FPS。即便如此,该系统在设计时并没有考虑到在原生 1800p 分辨率下流畅运行大多数游戏。
如下表Fire Strike 所示,不同功率配置之间的性能差距相对较小。唯一的例外是将系统设置为电池保护模式。
电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 9534 | 21092 | 3482 |
智能感应模式 | 9460 (-1%) | 20598 (-2%) | 3379 (-3%) |
平衡模式 | 9598 (-0%) | 19994 (-5%) | 3323 (-5%) |
电池保护模式 | 5644 (-41%) | 12361 (-41%) | 1729 (-50%) |
电池电量 | 9469 (-1%) | 20697 (-2%) | 3523 (-0%) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 11337 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32442 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8733 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4354 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 881 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT -2! | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 -1! | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W -2! | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 139.5 | 136 | 66.1 | 26.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 116.9 | 89 | 82.6 | 80.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 84.4 | 46.8 | 32.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 42.5 | 39.6 | 33.3 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 78 | 47 | 45 | 39 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 228 | 77.8 | 70.1 | 62.5 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 61.5 | 50.1 | 31.8 | 26.8 |
F1 22 (2022) | 101 | 90 | 66.5 | 19.6 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 40.2 | 33.7 | 30 | 29.5 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 46.3 | 36.5 | 31.8 | 24.5 |
排放量
系统噪音
整体噪音小于同类机型,如 Yoga 7 二合一或Latitude 9350 2 合 1。例如,运行3DMark 06 的第一个基准场景时,即使在性能模式下,风扇噪音也会低于 28 dB(A),在典型的办公环境中几乎听不到。游戏时的风扇噪音也比预期的要小,略低于 34 dB(A)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.2 / 23.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 27.8 / 43.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.9 dB(A) |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 165H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL8512HDLU | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W Vega 8, R7 5800H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | -1% | -8% | -16% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 22.9 | 23 -0% | 23 -0% | 23.9 -4% | 26 -14% | 23.3 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.2 | 23 1% | 23 1% | 23.9 -3% | 26 -12% | 23.3 -0% |
Idle Average * | 23.2 | 23 1% | 23 1% | 23.9 -3% | 26 -12% | 23.3 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.2 | 23 1% | 23 1% | 23.9 -3% | 27.3 -18% | 23.3 -0% |
Load Average * | 27.8 | 31 -12% | 29.5 -6% | 36.4 -31% | 39.8 -43% | 24 14% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 33.6 | 45.7 -36% | 36.2 -8% | |||
Load Maximum * | 43.4 | 47.7 -10% | 41.3 5% | 44.7 -3% | 42.4 2% | 55.8 -29% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.7 | 35.6 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
键盘和底部两侧的热点温度分别超过 35°C 至 37°C,而 Elite x360 1040 G11 的热点温度为 40°C 至 45°C。 Elite x360 1040 G11.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.8 °C / 76.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+3.3 °C / 6 F).
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -6% | -12% | -4% | -31% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 35.8 | 39 -9% | 38 -6% | 35.4 1% | 42.7 -19% | 44.2 -23% |
Maximum Bottom * | 37.6 | 43.6 -16% | 39.6 -5% | 37.8 -1% | 53.1 -41% | 45.8 -22% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25.2 | 24.4 3% | 30 -19% | 27.2 -8% | 32.9 -31% | 19.6 22% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.6 | 27.4 -3% | 31 -17% | 28.2 -6% | 35.2 -32% | 22 17% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
检查不同音乐类型/电话中内置扬声器的声音(音效、噪音、低音、最大音量......),比较设备类别、特殊功能(软件)......如何连接外部音频设备?测试适当的音频接口。分析粉红噪声图。
短评:分析扬声器。
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
由于采用 OLED 面板,系统在桌面上闲置时的功耗在 3 W 到 10 W 之间,具体取决于亮度级别、电源配置文件和屏幕色彩。运行 Prime95 时的功耗比 Elite x360 1040 G11 低约 20%,这与我们的酷睿至尊 7 258V 处理器性能降低 25% 至 30% 的情况相符。
如下面的截图所示,当 CPU 的利用率达到 100% 时,我们可以通过小巧(约 9.6 x 5.3 x 2.1 厘米)的 65 W USB-C 交流适配器暂时记录到最大 65 W 的功率。
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.84 Watt |
Idle | 3 / 4.4 / 9.4 Watt |
Load |
42.3 / 65 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL8512HDLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, , IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W R7 5800H, Vega 8, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | 2% | -21% | -54% | -51% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3 | 1.8 40% | 4.2 -40% | 3.2 -7% | 6.4 -113% | 5.4 -80% |
Idle Average * | 4.4 | 4.4 -0% | 5.7 -30% | 6.4 -45% | 9.4 -114% | 9.5 -116% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.4 | 4.5 52% | 5.9 37% | 10.8 -15% | 10.7 -14% | 12.4 -32% |
Load Average * | 42.3 | 40.7 4% | 42.4 -0% | 54.6 -29% | 52.2 -23% | 54.7 -29% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 49.9 | 54.6 -9% | 38.2 23% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 51.1 | 56.5 -11% | 40.5 21% | |||
Load Maximum * | 65 | 66 -2% | 64.5 1% | 70.2 -8% | 69 -6% | 63.4 2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.5 | 53 | 52 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
与其他大多数基于 Lunar Lake 处理器的笔记本电脑一样,这款笔记本电脑的运行时间也非常出色。在自动关机前,我们可以记录将近 14 小时的实际浏览时间,这与我们在性能更强的搭载酷睿 H 处理器的 Elite x360 1040 G11 上看到的情况接近。
从空电到满电大约需要 90 分钟。
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1040 G11 Ultra 7 165H, Arc 8-Core, 68 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 71 Wh | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, 60 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W R7 5800H, Vega 8, 63 Wh | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 16% | 17% | -3% | -38% | -41% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 837 | 969 16% | 981 17% | 815 -3% | 522 -38% | 494 -41% |
Reader / Idle | 3353 | 2331 | 1300 | 1324 | ||
Load | 99 | 134 | 143 | 124 | 114 | |
H.264 | 542 |
笔记本检查评级
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14
- 11/15/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.