惠普 ZBook Studio 16 G11 工作站评测：轻巧、性能卓越
升级版处理器和 RTX Ada 图形处理器。
惠普最轻的 16 英寸工作站之一采用了新的处理器选项，性能明显快于以往。除此之外，它与 ZBook Studio 16 G9 或 G10 采用了相同的设计，用户体验基本相同。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
结论：对于 16 英寸工作站而言，比预期更轻
尽管 ZBook Studio 16 G11 拥有轻薄的机身和 16 英寸的大屏幕，但它在便携性和制造质量方面表现出色。如果专业人士希望在不牺牲显示屏尺寸或性能的前提下，随身携带足够轻便的产品，Studio 16 G11 一定会让他们爱不释手，尤其是现在新的 GPU 选件明显比 G9 机型更快、更高效。
遗憾的是，该系统仍然存在许多与之前的 G10 或 G9 型号相同的缺陷，因为它们都采用了相同的底盘或骨架。例如，模糊的 100 万像素网络摄像头和缺乏隐私快门都表明了设计的老化。其他因素，如核心运行温度和电池续航时间分别比我们希望的要高和短，而 CPU 从 Alder Lake-H 升级到 Meteor Lake-H 的幅度远不及 GPU 的升级。如果用户需要比 RTX 3000 Ada 更快的图形处理能力，就必须考虑更厚的替代产品，如 ZBook Fury 16 系列等更厚的替代产品，它们可以配置 RTX 5000 Ada 选项。
我们还需要注意的是，我们在测试设备上遇到了一些冻结问题。在购买时不妨仔细检查一下您的设备是否存在故障。
Pros
+ 重量轻，图形处理性能高
+ 在同类产品中重量最轻
+ 全 DCI-P3 色彩
+ 易于维修
+ 可拆卸内存
Cons
- 负载情况下核心温度过高
- CPU 升级相对较小
- 低分辨率 1 MP 网络摄像头
- 无辅助 M.2 固态硬盘
- 电池寿命一般
- 无 OLED 选项
$3,200.29
HP ZBook Studio G11 16" Mobile Workstation - WQUXGA - Intel Core Ultra 7 165H - vPro Technology - 32 GB - 1 TB SSD - English Keyboard - Intel Chip - 3840 x 2400 - Windows 11 Pro - NVIDIA RTX 2000
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 84.2%  | HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $3,200.29 List Price: 4300 USD | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" 3840x2400 283 PPI IPS |
2. 90.1% v7 (old)  | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H ⎘ NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $150.00 Generic 16.0"" WQUXGA 3840(R... 2. $160.00 Generic Replacement Screen 1... 3. $169.89 HPDELGB NE160QAM-NZ1 Replace... List Price: 3300€ | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" 3840x2400 283 PPI IPS |
3. 85.4%  | HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,762.48 HP ZBook Power G11 16" Mobil... 2. $2,241.11 HP ZBook Power G11 A 16" Mob... 3. $3,095.83 HP ZBook Power G11 16" Mobil... List Price: 2100 USD | 2.2 kg | 22.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
4. 85.9%  | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 Intel Core i7-14700HX ⎘ NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,199.00 List Price: 3500 USD | 3.1 kg | 30.23 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
5. 88.3% v7 (old)  | Dell Precision 5690 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,099.43 List Price: 5900 USD | 2.3 kg | 22.17 mm | 16.00" 3840x2400 283 PPI OLED |
6. 84.3% v7 (old)  | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Intel Core i7-12700H ⎘ NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $63.99 240W AC Charger for Msi Stea... 2. $196.98 Factory Original 32GB (2x16G... 3. $34.99 Laptop Case Cover Sleeve for... List Price: 3500€ | 2.4 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
7. 83.5%  | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,869.99 List Price: 3239 Euro | 2 kg | 20.5 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS LED |
我们上一次评测 ZBook Studio 16 系列是 G9 机型早在 2022 年。2024 年，最新的型号是 G11，配备了速度更快的英特尔流星湖 CPU 和 Nvidia Ada Lovelace GPU，取代了旧版 Studio 16 上的 Alder Lake 和 Ampere 选项。
我们的测试机是最高端的配置，配备 Core Ultra 9 185H vPro CPU、RTX 3000 Ada GPU 和 2400p 120 Hz IPS 显示屏，售价约 2800 美元。其他 SKU 起始配置为酷睿 Ultra 7 155H、集成 Arc 显卡、GeForce RTX 4070 或 1200p 显示屏，如惠普官方产品页面所述.
ZBook Studio 16 G11 的替代产品包括其他 16 英寸移动工作站，如 联想 ThinkPad P16 Gen 2, 戴尔Precision 5690或 微星CreatorPro Z16P.
更多惠普评论：
规格
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 (ZBook Studio Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 16 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 91 W PL2 / Short Burst, 58 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1635 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz ( including 70 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 556.12, Optimus 1.0
Memory
64 GB
, SK Hynix, DDR5-5600, 46-45-45-90, Dual-Channel
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, AUO87A8, IPS, glossy: no, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, 1024 GB
Weight
1.814 kg, Power Supply: 461 g
Price
4300 USD
Amazon
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
ZBook Studio 16 G11 采用了与两年前的 ZBook Studio 16 G9 相同的机箱。尽管年代久远，但它仍然是一款设计强劲的产品，最显著的特点是轻薄便携。微星 微星CreatorPro Z16P或戴尔Precision 5690 的机身更大，重量也明显增加了至少 400 至 500 克。
连接性
虽然端口选项没有变化，但我们的设备上集成的 MicroSD 读卡器坏了，因此无法测试其传输速率性能。
交流
无线功能从联发科 Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 升级到英特尔 BE200，支持 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4。
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1195 (1089-1247)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1482 (1434-1502)
网络摄像头
遗憾的是，网络摄像头仍然是 720p 或只有 1 MP，而绝大多数其他笔记本电脑已经不再使用 1 MP 摄像头。
4.6 ∆E
3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
14 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
0.9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
0.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
维护
只需一把一字螺丝刀，就能轻松拆卸底部面板。惠普为许多机型提供官方维修视频与其他主要制造商不同，惠普为许多机型提供官方维修视频。
可持续性
惠普自 2022 年起生产的所有笔记本电脑均使用回收塑料和金属。不过，可回收材料与不可回收材料的比例因型号而异。
包装主要采用纸板和纸张，笔记本电脑和交流适配器采用塑料包装。
保修
如果在美国购买，制造商提供三年有限保修。
显示屏
惠普将 Studio 16 G9 的 4K 面板供应商从京东方换成了 Studio 16 G11 的友达光电。在刷新率（120 Hz）和色彩覆盖率（100% DCI-P3）方面，它们的核心属性基本相同。不过，这次的亮度降低了近 30%，而且仍然不支持 HDR。为了解决这个问题，我们提供了亮度稍高的 500 nit 选项。
在撰写本文时，该机型没有任何 OLED 选项。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUO87A8 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 426.5 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 404.6 cd/m² Minimum: 20.6 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 404.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1444:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.63 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.46
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 AUO87A8, IPS, 3840x2400, 16", 120 Hz | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA BOE0A52, IPS, 3840x2400, 16", 120 Hz | HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A AUOA0A9, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | Dell Precision 5690 Samsung 160YV03, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 Hz | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST B160QAN02.N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE MNG007DA1-9 , IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -16% | -17% | 5% | 1% | -16% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 97.7 | 97.5 0% | 69.1 -29% | 68.4 -30% | 99.8 2% | 97.6 0% | 69.4 -29% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 97.7 -2% | 96.9 -3% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 97.6 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.7 | 86.3 1% | 71 -17% | 70.6 -18% | 96.6 13% | 87.4 2% | 71.8 -16% |
| Response Times | 17% | 13% | 4% | 86% | 20% | 11% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14.2 ? | 15.3 ? -8% | 13.6 ? 4% | 14.1 ? 1% | 1.7 ? 88% | 12.8 ? 10% | 11.2 ? 21% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.6 ? | 6.1 ? 42% | 8.4 ? 21% | 9.9 ? 7% | 1.7 ? 84% | 7.4 ? 30% | 10.6 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency | 60 ? | ||||||
| Screen | 18% | -20% | 17% | -11% | 10% | -32% | |
| Brightness middle | 404.3 | 554 37% | 470.7 16% | 531.5 31% | 348.1 -14% | 407 1% | 516 28% |
| Brightness | 405 | 516 27% | 431 6% | 499 23% | 351 -13% | 388 -4% | 505 25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 84 -9% | 88 -4% | 89 -3% | 97 5% | 88 -4% | 89 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.47 -68% | 0.57 -104% | 0.38 -36% | 0.36 -29% | 0.41 -46% | |
| Contrast | 1444 | 1179 -18% | 826 -43% | 1399 -3% | 1131 -22% | 1259 -13% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.63 | 1 62% | 2.16 18% | 1.82 31% | 4.18 -59% | 1.3 51% | 3.5 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.48 | 2.4 46% | 4.39 2% | 4.1 8% | 6.68 -49% | 2.5 44% | 8.8 -96% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.46 | 0.6 59% | 1.37 6% | 0.63 57% | 0.97 34% | 0.7 52% | 1.2 18% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 1.6 24% | 3.7 -76% | 1.2 43% | 1.7 19% | 2.1 -0% | 5.6 -167% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.29 96% | 2.38 92% | 2.15 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.26 97% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6810 95% | 6458 101% | 6765 96% | 6484 100% | 6198 105% | 6437 101% | 6071 107% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 12% /
14% | -8% /
-14% | 1% /
8% | 27% /
9% | 10% /
9% | -12% /
-22% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏根据 P3 标准进行了预校准，灰度和色彩 deltaE 平均值较低，分别仅为 2.1 和 2.63。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 14.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 Windows 和 MyHP 设置为性能模式。
处理器
虽然速度不如相邻的 Raptor Lake-HX 系列，但基于 Meteor Lake 的 酷睿至尊 9 185H相比仍略有提升 酷睿 i7-12800H相比，ZBook Studio 16 G9 的酷睿 i7-12800H 在多线程任务方面仍略有提升，提升幅度约为 10%。遗憾的是，尽管采用了相对较大的 16 英寸外形，它仍无法长时间维持 Turbo Boost 时钟频率。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2646 (2585.98-2853.07)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2518 (2462.45-2642.53)
HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2285 (2083.77-2574.67)
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 Intel Core i7-14700HX: Ø3368 (2675.23-3930.05)
Dell Precision 5690 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2340 (2218.28-3164.56)
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2211 (2130.95-2274.54)
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2743 (2699.24-2880.39)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G11 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9140 - 14540, n=18) | |
| Average of class Workstation (10200 - 16482, n=22, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 16 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6 21FV001KUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G6-21FV000DGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5680 | |
| Average of class Workstation (2352 - 2949, n=22, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16v G1 AMD | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16s G2 21K9000CGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1490 - 2573, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9220 - 18676, n=18) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (48865 - 96463, n=18) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2394 - 4534, n=18) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (66785 - 95241, n=18) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (7255 - 11392, n=18) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (24004 - 48020, n=18) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (53116 - 154066, n=18) | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (678 - 1341, n=18) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4428 - 10078, n=18) | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (44809 - 53918, n=18) | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
压力测试
仔细观察系统的实时状态，就会发现其 Turbo Boost 潜力有限。例如，在运行 Prime95 压力测试时，CPU 在测试开始的几秒钟内几乎立即达到 89 C。随后，CPU 会从 3.3 GHz 和 89 W 迅速降至 2.3 GHz 和 70 W，以便将核心温度控制在 100 C 以下。
运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，CPU 和 GPU 温度分别稳定在 68 C 和 70 C，而性能更强的戴尔Precision 5690 的 CPU 和 GPU 温度分别为 75 C 和 62 C。
| 平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 51 | 45 |
| Prime95 压力 | 2.3 | -- | 99 | 54 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.5 | 1410 | 80 | 67 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 1.0 | 1950 | 68 | 70 |
系统性能
由于 CPU 和 GPU 的改进，PCMark 分数始终高于即将上市的 ZBook Studio 16 G9。不过，值得注意的是，我们在测试过程中遇到了几次死机和黑屏，每次都需要重启。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (7383 - 7537, n=2) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (10514 - 11137, n=2) | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (9153 - 9356, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (10716 - 11811, n=2) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (1754 - 1770, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (1643 - 1686, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (1981 - 2001, n=2) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (1438 - 1458, n=2) | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (286 - 295, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (261 - 268, n=2) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (515 - 522, n=2) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7537 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (69929 - 95718, n=18) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (64619 - 87768, n=18) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51114 - 93871, n=18) | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (121.4 - 259, n=18) | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开主页的多个浏览器标签页时，LatencyMon 会显示轻微的 DPC 问题。以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频时也会出现轻微问题，在 60 秒的窗口内记录到 5 个丢帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的系统配备了 Kioxia XG8 PCIe4NVMe 硬盘，而不是旧款 ZBook Studio 16 G9 上的 Micron 3400。其他方面的性能也非常出色，没有发现任何节流问题。
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6544 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5399 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
452.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
389.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2549 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3304 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
44.67 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
126.4 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6840 (5394.41-6871.11)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH: Ø6517 (6159.96-6615.87)
图形处理器性能
更新的 GPU 是将 ZBook Studio 16 G9 升级到 ZBook Studio 16 G11 的最大原因之一。我们的 RTX 3000 Ada性能比 RTX A2000快近 2 倍。
| 电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 23931 | 29398 | 10367 |
| 平衡模式 | 21021 (-12%) | 27903 (-5%) | 8545 (-18%) |
| 电池供电 | 14313 (-40%) | 12099 (-59%) | 5174 (-50%) |
如上文Fire Strike 结果所示，在平衡模式下运行会对性能产生轻微影响。如果使用电池供电，差异会更加明显。
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | SPECviewperf 12 | SPECviewperf 13 | SPECviewperf 2020
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 29401 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 34703 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 21697 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 10036 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2139 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 -1! | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST -2! | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA -2! | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 | |
| MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
| Dell Precision 5690 | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 | |
| HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A | |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Far Cry 5 | Strange Brigade | F1 22 | Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
即使反复测试，《赛博朋克 2077》空闲时的帧速率仍略显不稳定。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU: Ø65.7 (59.1-68.3)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 182.2 | 176 | 163.2 | 96.6 | 76.1 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 176.2 | 159.9 | 148.2 | 143.3 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 189.4 | 128.7 | 97 | 71.3 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 131.3 | 109.7 | 87.1 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 154 | 133 | 130 | 118 | 93 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 415 | 246 | 192.8 | 172.6 | 118.6 |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 194 | 157.7 | 110 | 87.9 | 60.5 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 226 | 212 | 161.1 | 62.8 | 40.7 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 130.6 | 111.8 | 98.4 | 96.7 | 68.7 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 104.6 | 87.9 | 74.2 | 64.3 | 39.6 |
排放量
系统噪音
风扇噪音和性能与旧款 ZBook Studio 16 G9 相比没有明显变化。例如，在运行游戏等重负载时，风扇噪音会稳定在 46 到 48 分贝（A）左右。不过，如果 CPU 和 GPU 的压力相同，我们可以在较新的 G11 机型上记录到 53 dB(A) 的最大噪音。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.8 / 26.4 / 26.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 33.7 / 53.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A) | ||
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N | Dell Precision 5690 NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0) | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | 9% | -11% | -4% | -6% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 23.8 | 24 -1% | 23.5 1% | 23.9 -0% | 23.4 2% | 24.1 -1% | 24.7 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.8 | 24 -1% | 23.8 -0% | 29.1 -22% | 23.6 1% | 27.1 -14% | 24.7 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 26.4 | 27.7 -5% | 24.2 8% | 29.1 -10% | 24.9 6% | 27.1 -3% | 24.7 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26.4 | 27.7 -5% | 24.2 8% | 29.1 -10% | 30.9 -17% | 27.1 -3% | 24.7 6% |
| Load Average * | 33.7 | 39.8 -18% | 25.4 25% | 41 -22% | 40.4 -20% | 42.9 -27% | 43.7 -30% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 46.1 | 43 7% | 52.8 -15% | 53.2 -15% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 53.2 | 47.7 10% | 45 15% | 52.9 1% | 51.9 2% | 47 12% | 53.3 -0% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.3 | 48.3 | 44 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
值得庆幸的是，键盘和掌托的温度要低得多，中心位置的温度最高可达 38 摄氏度。
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the class Workstation.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+0.4 °C / 0.7 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the class Workstation.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+0.4 °C / 0.7 F).
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Dell Precision 5690 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 2% | 12% | 4% | 5% | -13% | 4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 36.6 | 38.7 -6% | 40.6 -11% | 46.6 -27% | 46.6 -27% | 56.3 -54% | 50.3 -37% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 47.8 | 53.4 -12% | 40.6 15% | 51 -7% | 33 31% | 68.3 -43% | 38 21% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 31.4 | 27.3 13% | 26 17% | 24.8 21% | 32.4 -3% | 25.2 20% | 28.3 10% |
| Idle Bottom * | 35.6 | 31.6 11% | 26.6 25% | 25.6 28% | 29.4 17% | 25.9 27% | 27.3 23% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
该机型的要求略高于较老和较慢的 ZBook Studio 16 G9。不过，每瓦特性能仍然高出很多，因此对于追求性能的用户来说，较高的功耗是值得的。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.15 / 1.3 Watt |
| Idle | 14 / 22.4 / 25.7 Watt |
| Load |
90.2 / 142 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, IPS, 3840x2400, 16" | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 3840x2400, 16" | HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A R7 8845HS, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 i7-14700HX, NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Precision 5690 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0), OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 8% | 36% | -26% | 9% | 7% | 17% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 14 | 7.2 49% | 4.6 67% | 7.9 44% | 7.9 44% | 10.8 23% | 7.3 48% |
| Idle Average * | 22.4 | 18.1 19% | 10 55% | 13.1 42% | 12 46% | 16.3 27% | 12.3 45% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25.7 | 18.5 28% | 10.6 59% | 24.2 6% | 28.6 -11% | 16.9 34% | 17.9 30% |
| Load Average * | 90.2 | 112.8 -25% | 60.9 32% | 127.4 -41% | 98.8 -10% | 111.7 -24% | 78.2 13% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 120.3 | 92.8 23% | 219 -82% | 117.7 2% | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 125.4 | 96.8 23% | 225 -79% | 123.5 2% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 142 | 186 -31% | 154.8 -9% | 248.5 -75% | 174.8 -23% | 177.4 -25% | 167.5 -18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 106.7 | 144.5 | 152.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø150.1 (134.5-154.3)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø122.8 (116.7-186.1)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø16.8 (15.5-20.9)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø125.4 (112.8-134.9)
Power Consumption external Monitor
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø123.8 (93.1-146.1)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø112.6 (103.4-126.5)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø126.8 (118.6-132.4)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø139.5 (137.6-141.9)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø114.6 (106.5-118.2)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø79.4 (77.1-88)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø15 (13.9-18.6)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø120.3 (109.2-135.4)
电池寿命
运行时间没有改善，甚至可能比以前更短。
| HP ZBook Studio 16 G11 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A R7 8845HS, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 i7-14700HX, NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 94 Wh | Dell Precision 5690 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 98 Wh | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 21KV001SGE Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 30% | 101% | -49% | 89% | 20% | 105% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 290 | 377 30% | 582 101% | 148 -49% | 549 89% | 348 20% | 595 105% |
| H.264 | 509 | ||||||
| Load | 63 | 103 | 114 | ||||
| Reader / Idle | 1566 |
笔记本检查评级
HP ZBook Studio 16 G11
- 11/30/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Workstation - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
