Eurocom Raptor X17笔记本电脑评测:微星和华硕ROG的替代品
在最近检查了15.6英寸的 Raptor X15之后,我们现在准备处理其更大的兄弟--17.3英寸的Raptor X17。它的机箱是一种新的设计(X370),在审查时我们还没有从其他品牌那里看到。尽管如此,我们完全期待像申克这样的其他经销商最终能以不同的品牌为海外市场提供同样的机箱。
我们在审查中的配置是一个高端SKU,配备第13代猛禽湖酷睿i9-13900HX CPU,175瓦GeForce RTX 4090 GPU,64GB DDR5内存,3x 1TB SSD,以及1440p 240 Hz显示屏,价格约为6600美元。当然,用户可以用更少的内存和存储空间以及i7-13700HX或RTX 4080进行配置,起价更低。
猛禽X17的竞争者包括其他薄至中型的17英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 Razer Blade 17, 华硕ROG Strix Scar 17, 技嘉Aorus 17X, 或 微星GS77.
更多关于Eurocom的评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.8 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Eurocom Raptor X17 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.5 kg | 24.9 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
88.3 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 28.3 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
86 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Aorus 17X AZF i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 21.8 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
88.3 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 23 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.9 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 27 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.1 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT | 3.4 kg | 26.7 mm | 17.00" | 3840x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例--全新的重新开始
Raptor X17可能是我们从Eurocom看到的最时尚的笔记本电脑。超级光滑和大部分的金属骨架与同一公司较老和较厚的ABS设计形成了强烈的对比。机箱的刚性也很好,沿着底座和外盖的弯曲度最小,给人以坚实的第一印象。
也许机箱最弱的方面是铰链,因为显示器在调整角度时,与华硕ROG笔记本的较硬和较大的铰链相比,摇晃得有点厉害。 华硕ROG笔记本电脑.当用手指施加压力时,键盘中心也会轻微弯曲,这对打字时的按键反馈有负面影响。希望未来的任何重新设计能够解决这些问题。
在3.5公斤,猛禽X17是一个较重的游戏笔记本电脑在其尺寸类甚至超过了3.4公斤的 猛龙X17的重量甚至超过了3.4公斤的Alienware m17 R5。.最值得注意的是,该系统比ROG Strix Scar 17 G733略小,但却比它重20%,给人一种非常密集的感觉。对于一些明显更轻和更小的东西,用户可能要考虑 Razer Blade 17来代替。
连接性--每件事都有一点儿
与其他大多数17英寸游戏笔记本相比,端口选项更加多样化。例如,找到一个同时集成迷你DisplayPort和RJ-45的模型是不常见的。所有的USB端口都在机箱的两侧,而后部则是几乎所有的其他端口。
沟通
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 |
网络摄像头
无论价格如何,200万像素的网络摄像头是大多数其他笔记本电脑的典型。至少内置了支持你好的红外线,并且有一个电子快门以保护隐私。希望下一代机型将整合5MP网络摄像头,就像最新的 Razer Blade 18.
维护
底部面板由16颗飞利浦螺钉固定,相对容易拆卸。一旦进入,用户就可以接触到可拆卸的WLAN模块,2个SODIMM插槽,以及3个PCIe4 x4 M.2 2280插槽。该系统不支持PCIe5速度,与最近的微星GE和GT刷新不同。
配件和保修
零售包装盒包括一张设备驱动光盘、Windows 11驱动U盘和一块天鹅绒擦拭布,此外还有通常的文件和交流电适配器。标准的一年有限保修期适用,可选择延长至三年。
输入设备 - 传统的Eurocom
键盘
由于底层ODM保持不变,打字体验在大多数Eurocom型号中是一致的。尽管屏幕尺寸不同,但猛禽X17的膜基键盘与猛禽X15相同,这是一个遗憾,因为小键盘的按键仍然比QWERTY主键更窄、更拥挤。
键盘反馈比微星GE78上的按键更柔和。 微星GE78或华硕ROG Strix Scar 17。因此,打字员可能更喜欢相对安静的咔哒声,但硬核玩家可能会对缺乏 "咔哒声 "感到失望。
触摸板
与微星GE78 HX上较小的13 x 8.2厘米点击板相比,点击板很大,为15 x 9厘米。在中高速度下滑行流畅,而在较慢速度下有一点粘性,以帮助提高精确度。
在点击板上的反馈是偏软的,行程较浅,与微星GE78 HX上的不同。 Razer Blade 17.因此,尽管表面积很大,但拖放动作执行起来还是有点麻烦。只要有可能,专用的USB鼠标仍然是最好的选择。
显示器 - 240赫兹,QHD,G-Sync,全DCI-P3颜色
有两种显示方式可供选择:240赫兹的QHD或144赫兹的4K UHD,每个都有100%的DCI-P3色彩和G-Sync支持。我们的具体测试装置配备了前者。
我们的系统采用了京东方非常相似的IPS面板,作为在ROG Strix Scar 17(NE173QHM-NZ1 vs. NE173QHM-NZ2)。我们可以注意到这两块面板在快速刷新率、快速响应时间、广泛的色彩覆盖率、亮度目标和体面的对比度方面没有大的区别。这是一款适合游戏和内容编辑的高端面板。
我们的一个抱怨涉及到我们测试单元上明显的背光出血。尽管大多数IPS面板都会有一些出血现象,但与我们测试过的其他价格低于一半的笔记本电脑相比,这里的出血现象更为严重。
|
Brightness Distribution: 75 %
Center on Battery: 312.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1202:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.74
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Eurocom Raptor X17 BOE NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Aorus 17X AZF BOE09F9, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US AU Optronics B170QAN01.2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AU Optronics AUODBA3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -1% | 0% | -16% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.8 | 98 0% | 96.7 -1% | 97.6 0% | 69.1 -29% | 97.2 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% | 99.6 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.4 | 85.6 0% | 84.5 -1% | 86.5 1% | 69.8 -18% | 88.4 4% |
Response Times | 20% | -3% | 52% | 8% | -20% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13.3 ? | 6.2 ? 53% | 14 ? -5% | 4.2 ? 68% | 12 ? 10% | 16.4 ? -23% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10 ? | 11.4 ? -14% | 10.1 ? -1% | 6.4 ? 36% | 9.4 ? 6% | 11.6 ? -16% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 25% | 6% | -13% | 19% | -67% | |
Brightness middle | 312.6 | 322.5 3% | 294 -6% | 398.6 28% | 417.3 33% | 484 55% |
Brightness | 292 | 317 9% | 276 -5% | 384 32% | 387 33% | 449 54% |
Brightness Distribution | 75 | 86 15% | 90 20% | 89 19% | 87 16% | 87 16% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.29 -12% | 0.28 -8% | 0.46 -77% | 0.42 -62% | 0.55 -112% |
Contrast | 1202 | 1112 -7% | 1050 -13% | 867 -28% | 994 -17% | 880 -27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.43 | 1.15 66% | 2.81 18% | 4.05 -18% | 2.14 38% | 4.8 -40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.31 | 3.03 64% | 5.7 31% | 8.68 -4% | 4.09 51% | 7.48 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.74 | 0.56 24% | 0.86 -16% | 1.02 -38% | 0.42 43% | 4.74 -541% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 1.7 65% | 3.4 29% | 6.5 -35% | 3.1 35% | 5.5 -15% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.27 97% | 2.301 96% | 2.11 104% | 2.19 100% | 2.42 91% |
CCT | 7082 92% | 6299 103% | 7389 88% | 7518 86% | 6040 108% | 6148 106% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 15% /
19% | 1% /
3% | 13% /
-1% | 4% /
10% | -29% /
-45% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示器开箱后并没有进行预校准。相反,Eurocom对工厂校准收取额外费用,考虑到已经很高的价格,我们觉得这很荒唐。其他制造商,如微星、华硕、戴尔和其他公司,为其各自的许多型号提供预校准作为标准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
13.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 7.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
户外可视性是大多数游戏笔记本电脑的典型特征,因为300尼特是该类别的平均水平。一些竞争机型的面板可以达到500尼特,如外星人m17 R5或Razer Blade 17更容易在户外观看,但考虑到17英寸游戏笔记本的尺寸和重量,我们不认为这是对Eurocom的巨大优势。
性能 - Raptor X17的Raptor Lake
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们通过控制中心和Windows将我们的设备设置为性能模式。令人讨厌的是,控制中心的电源设置并不与Windows的电源设置相联系,这意味着如果两个设置不完全相同,可能会有一些冲突。例如,有可能同时将Windows设置为省电模式和控制中心设置为性能模式。戴尔等OEM厂商已经在他们的Alienware系列上解决了这个问题。
在进行基准测试之前,我们还将设备设置为dGPU模式。Raptor X17支持混合图形模式(Optimus)、dGPU模式和动态(又称高级Optimus)模式。尽管我们很欣赏这些选项,但这些设置被深埋在BIOS的几层子菜单中。相比之下,微星和华硕等竞争对手在其各自的控制中心应用程序中都有类似的设置,更容易访问。
处理器
芯片酷睿i9-13900HX在我们的设备中,相对于其他采用相同处理器的笔记本电脑来说,性能略微慢了5%左右。不管怎么说,它仍然是市场上最快的H系列CPU之一,可与竞争性的 Ryzen 9 7945HX.从去年的 酷睿i9-12900HX将使多线程性能提高约20%。
性能的可持续性非常好,特别是与Aorus 17X 相比,后者搭载了相同的Core i9-13900HX。在整个压力测试过程中,CineBench R15 xT循环得分在我们的设备上会更稳定,如下图所示的对比图。
从我们的Core i9-13900HX降级到Core i7-13700HX 配置,预计多线程性能会降低约20%至25%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21) | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Aorus 17X AZF |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21) | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21) | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21) | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21) | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Aorus 17X AZF |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21) | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21) | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (7690 - 9331, n=8) | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10972 - 11983, n=8) | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9038 - 11680, n=8) | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10605 - 16395, n=8) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Aorus 17X AZF |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1825 - 2295, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1666 - 2166, n=8) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2162 - 2514, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1441 - 2275, n=8) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
PCMark 10 Score | 8316 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21) | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Aorus 17X AZF |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在打开我们的主页的多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。在60 FPS下的4K视频播放是完美的,CPU利用率低,没有丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 3x PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘
我们的设备配置了 三个三星980 ProPCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘组成RAID 0,以实现性能最大化。事实上,这是少数在RAID配置中支持这么多驱动器的游戏笔记本电脑之一。最大传输率最高约为19000MB/s,但预计在压力下,性能会在15000至18000MB/s之间徘徊,这仍然令人印象深刻。在这方面,我们可以注意到没有重大的节流问题。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Aorus 17X AZF | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - 175 W TGP图形
图形性能在我们数据库中的平均笔记本电脑的几个百分点之内,具有相同的 同样的GeForce RTX 4090GPU。在娱乐模式而不是性能模式下运行将使图形性能下降约4%至5%。一个 "适当的" 桌面GeForce RTX 4090仍然比我们的移动RTX 4090快得多,大约60%到80%,因为移动GPU有很大的散热限制。
请注意,降级到 移动GeForce RTX 4080配置只会使图形性能降低约5%至10%。因此,移动RTX 4080可能值得考虑,因为这两个GPU之间的性能非常相似。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Palit GeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC -2! | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS -1! | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E -1! | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) -2! | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 -1! | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY -2! | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS -1! | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 42940 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 33425 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 19502 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
虽然移动RTX 4090的速度远不及桌面RTX 4090,但对于像《F1 22》、《Returnal》或《赛博朋克2077》这样要求最高的游戏来说,它仍然很强大。更具体地说,移动RTX 4090似乎非常适合在高至超设置下以120 FPS的速度瞄准1440p或60 FPS的速度瞄准4K。你会想尽可能在dGPU模式或高级优化模式下运行,特别是由于G-Sync在混合图形模式下不可用。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Palit GeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Palit GeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Palit GeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Palit GeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Palit GeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-46-R1A1 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 187.2 | 186.4 | 183.7 | 139.5 | 134.3 | 173.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 512.8 | 448.8 | 388.1 | 207.2 | 163.8 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 234 | 207 | 199.4 | 184.9 | 178.5 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 219 | 204 | 172.2 | 149 | 88.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 192.9 | 172.1 | 136.2 | 117.3 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 439 | 351 | 341 | 328 | 300 | 155.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 114 | 109.4 | 103.7 | 91 | 87.3 | 47.3 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 271.8 | 238.8 | 203.3 | 183.1 | 130.7 | 68.7 |
F1 22 (2022) | 210 | 209 | 199 | 120.8 | 90.2 | 44.3 |
Returnal (2023) | 145 | 153 | 159 | 141 | 115 | 69 |
排放
系统噪音 - 游戏时非常响亮
无论电源设置或屏幕上的负载如何,风扇始终处于活动状态。例如,即使设置为静音模式,在23 dB(A)的静音背景下,仍会有33 dB(A)的最低风扇噪音。这个水平比大多数其他游戏笔记本的声音大,在办公环境下也能听到。如果设置为性能模式或娱乐模式,即使是简单的浏览或视频流,风扇也会定期跳动。当不需要额外的马力时,你肯定希望尽可能地使用低功率设置。
在性能模式下的游戏会引起近61 dB(A)的风扇噪音,比竞争的游戏笔记本电脑如Alienware m17 R5或微星GE78HX.50多分贝(A)的范围很响,但用一副好的耳机就可以忍受,但60多分贝(A)让人很难玩对噪音敏感的游戏,如《堡垒之夜》 或《守望先锋》 ,其中脚步声和其他音频队列对游戏至关重要。
将电源设置从性能模式改为娱乐模式会使风扇噪音从60.7 dB(A)略微下降到59.7 dB(A)。差别如此之小,以至于你在游戏时不妨运行性能模式而完全跳过娱乐模式。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 33.1 / 33.1 / 40.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 59.9 / 61 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A) |
Eurocom Raptor X17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, 3x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB (RAID 0) | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 22% | 10% | 16% | 16% | 23% | |
off / environment * | 23.3 | 22.7 3% | 25 -7% | 23.4 -0% | 25.2 -8% | 23 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 33.1 | 23.5 29% | 28 15% | 24.2 27% | 28 15% | 23 31% |
Idle Average * | 33.1 | 27.7 16% | 29 12% | 25.6 23% | 28 15% | 28.11 15% |
Idle Maximum * | 40.7 | 27.7 32% | 34 16% | 31 24% | 30.4 25% | 28.11 31% |
Load Average * | 59.9 | 30.5 49% | 51 15% | 43.3 28% | 41 32% | 30.62 49% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 60.8 | 51.4 15% | 57 6% | 56.3 7% | 50.7 17% | 49.75 18% |
Load Maximum * | 61 | 54.1 11% | 54 11% | 59.1 3% | 52.6 14% | 50.17 18% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于CPU和GPU都在正下方,所以键盘中心的表面温度最热。在这个区域的热点可以达到56摄氏度以上,而在Aorus 17X上则是46摄氏度和35摄氏度。Aorus 17X和微星Raider GE78 HX的温度分别为46℃和35℃。值得庆幸的是,掌托、WASD键和数字键盘区域几乎没有那么热,可以在游戏时保持双手的舒适。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.2 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.3 °C / -4.2 F).
Eurocom Raptor X17 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 24% | 8% | 14% | 15% | 4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 49.4 | 34.6 30% | 47 5% | 37.4 24% | 39 21% | 53 -7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 55.2 | 35.6 36% | 51 8% | 45 18% | 44 20% | 56 -1% |
Idle Upper Side * | 33.4 | 27.2 19% | 30 10% | 29.8 11% | 31 7% | 30 10% |
Idle Bottom * | 33.4 | 30 10% | 31 7% | 32.4 3% | 29.8 11% | 29 13% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时,时钟频率和主板功耗会分别提升到4GHz和155W,然后迅速下降到3.3GHz和110W范围。核心温度将保持在97摄氏度,这可能是最大涡轮增压时间非常短的原因。在微星GE78HX或Eluktronics Mech-17 GP上重复这个测试。 Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2将导致类似的核心温度超过90摄氏度,这表明大多数13代H系列CPU在负载时通常比平均温度要高。
当运行 Witcher 3将系统调低到平衡模式(或娱乐模式)将使GPU的时钟频率降低到2055MHz,温度为76C,功率仅为146W,因此,如果你想发挥GPU的最大作用,你需要启用性能模式并忍受其较大的风扇噪音。
用电池供电运行限制了性能。在电池上进行的Fire Strike 测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为12863和10075分,而在主电源上则为36634和44766分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | GPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 50 | 40 |
Prime95压力 | 3.3 | -- | 97 | 53 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.2 | 840 - 2400 | 98 | 74 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡模式) | 1.4 | 2055 | 92 | 76 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | 1.5 | 2250 | 97 | 81 |
发言人
集成的扬声器是令人失望的。不仅低音再现不佳,而且最大音量为71 dB(A),明显比其他大多数游戏笔记本的80 dB(A)或更大的音量要安静得多。这绝对让人感觉是对这种新机箱设计的一种削减。
Eurocom Raptor X17 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功率消耗 - 游戏时超过300W
在桌面上空转消耗13瓦至43瓦,取决于电源配置文件、GPU设置和显示器亮度。事实上,43瓦与三星Galaxy Book3 15等由Core U驱动的超极本在最大负荷下的耗电量差不多。简单地从iGPU模式切换到dGPU模式将使欧朋的功耗增加约9W。因此,耗电量对主动电源配置文件非常敏感。
游戏时的平均功耗非常高,为304W,而竞争者的平均功耗为278W。华硕ROG Strix Scar 17或Aorus 17X采用相同的GeForce RTX 4090 GPU。三块固态硬盘、快速的240赫兹刷新率、高内存容量和略高的GPU功耗,都是造成Eurocom上更高消耗的原因。
当CPU和GPU都处于100%的利用率时,我们能够从大型(约18.5 x 8.5 x 3.5厘米)330瓦交流适配器中记录到320瓦的最大功耗。由于散热限制,这一比率将随着时间的推移而下降,如下图所示。
Off / Standby | 0.5 / 1.67 Watt |
Idle | 13.4 / 22.2 / 42.4 Watt |
Load |
132.8 / 319.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Eurocom Raptor X17 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 3x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB (RAID 0), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Aorus 17X AZF i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 3840x2160, 17" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 5% | 13% | 3% | 5% | 27% | |
Idle Minimum * | 13.4 | 14.5 -8% | 11 18% | 16.1 -20% | 14 -4% | 13 3% |
Idle Average * | 22.2 | 21.1 5% | 17 23% | 24 -8% | 19.3 13% | 16.5 26% |
Idle Maximum * | 42.4 | 42.8 -1% | 29 32% | 34 20% | 36.8 13% | 17 60% |
Load Average * | 132.8 | 116.7 12% | 134 -1% | 123.6 7% | 117.2 12% | 93 30% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 304 | 278 9% | 278 9% | 286 6% | 304 -0% | 239 21% |
Load Maximum * | 319.8 | 279.6 13% | 334 -4% | 285.7 11% | 342.5 -7% | 251 22% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
考虑到内部设备的强大,运行时间是相当不错的。在iGPU激活的情况下,我们能够在平衡电源配置文件中记录到不到5小时的真实世界WLAN浏览。即便如此,像Aorus 17X或MSI GE78HX这样的竞争机型都能比我们的Eurocom多持续一个多小时。
用附带的330瓦交流适配器从空电到满电的充电速度相对较慢,为2至2.5小时。支持通过第三方USB-C交流适配器进行充电,但请注意,它只适用于两个USB-C端口中的一个(最靠近后部的端口)。
Eurocom Raptor X17 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Aorus 17X AZF i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 97 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -17% | 20% | -3% | 2% | 8% | |
Reader / Idle | 612 | 541 -12% | 439 -28% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 299 | 248 -17% | 389 30% | 363 21% | 305 2% | 290 -3% |
Load | 91 | 128 41% | 89 -2% | 107 18% | ||
H.264 | 403 | 294 |
Pros
Cons
评语--表现出色,但可以使用更多的处理办法
Raptor X17最好的方面是其相对于薄型的性能非常快。它将毫不掩饰地运行得非常热和非常响,以便尽可能地从CPU和GPU中挤出更多的性能。性能猎手可能会特别欣赏这种方法,以及对多达三个PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘的支持。
不幸的是,有一些缺点需要牢记。在游戏时超过60分贝(A),该系统明显比市场上大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑的声音大。当竞争机型如微星GE78HX或 华硕ROG Strix Scar 17可以提供类似的处理器选项,而在游戏时运行的噪音要小10dB(A),那么在市场上的许多替代品中,喜欢猛禽X17就变得更加困难。更重的重量对它也没有好处。
硬件和性能都很扎实,但其他方面,如弱小的扬声器,非常响亮的风扇,以及不精致的控制中心软件,都没有正确反映出高价。
还有一些细节我们认为也可以做得更好。混乱的电源配置文件、脉动的风扇行为、隐藏的GPU模式、适度不均匀的背光出血和可选的校准显示器都是在一个起价远远超过3000美元的高端笔记本电脑上看到的令人遗憾的事情。Eurocom说它目前正在重新设计BIOS菜单和控制中心软件,希望能解决我们的一些抱怨。
价格和可用性
Eurocom现在在北美发货Raptor X17在北美的基本配置起价为3550美元,在我们的测试装置中配置的价格超过6000美元。
Eurocom Raptor X17
-
05/18/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.