戴尔 XPS 13 9345 骁龙 X 精英版评测:超越英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7
还有什么比在戴尔最受欢迎的消费类笔记本电脑上首次使用处理器更好的炫耀方式呢?XPS 13 Plus 9320/9340 的机身重新采用了最新的 Snapdragon X Elite CPU,成为今年发布的少数搭载高通处理器的 Windows 笔记本电脑之一。这款骁龙机型被称为 XPS 13 9345,在外观上与现有的 XPS 13 Plus 9320或 9340 的外观完全相同。
我们的评测配置配备了骁龙 X1 Elite X1E-80-100、16 GB LPDDR5X-8448 内存和 1200p 120 Hz IPS 显示屏,售价约 1300 美元。有更高端的 OLED 面板可供选择,某些地区还可能包括第二个骁龙 X1 Plus X1P 处理器选项,但集成 GPU 仍保持不变。
XPS 13 9345 的替代产品包括 微软 Surface Pro或 三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 16两者均采用相同的骁龙 X1 Elite X1E-80-100 处理器。当然,它也直接与更传统的 13 英寸和 14 英寸办公亚笔记本电脑竞争,如 联想 ThinkBook 13x G4, 华硕 ZenBook S13或戴尔自己的 XPS 13 9340。
更多戴尔评测:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.5 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Dell XPS 13 9345 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.2 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
86.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.2 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
86.2 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.3 kg | 17.5 mm | 13.80" | 2304x1536 | |
90.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core | 1.2 kg | 12.9 mm | 13.50" | 2880x1920 | |
82.3 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.3 kg | 11.2 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
85.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 11.8 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 熟悉的外观和感觉
高通机型与英特尔机型之间没有外部差异,因此 我们对英特尔模式的评论也同样适用。如果有新的颜色选择就更好了,但铂金色和石墨色的选择还是一样的。我们略微偏爱铂金色,因为它的亮白色比高通测试机的深色石墨色更能遮盖指纹,尤其是掌托和外盖。
连接性
与英特尔版 XPS 13 一样,这里也有两个 USB-C 4.0 端口。不过,这里的端口不支持 Thunderbolt,因此不能保证与 eGPU 兼容。当尝试连接我们的 Aorus RTX 2080 Ti 游戏盒例如,高通笔记本电脑无法识别 eGPU,而支持 Thunderbolt 的电脑则可以通过设备管理器自动识别。高通公司表示,任何支持和适用的驱动程序都将取决于各个 eGPU 制造商,这对现有 eGPU 用户来说并不乐观。
交流
戴尔将英特尔 XPS 13 上的 BE200 换成了高通 XPS 13 上的 FastConnect 7800。该模块支持 Wi-Fi 7 连接,这在大多数家庭中仍不常见。不过,在与我们的 Wi-Fi 6E AXE11000 测试路由器配对时,性能还是很稳定的。
网络摄像头
该机型标配与 XPS 13 9340 相同的 200 万像素网络摄像头,而不是原来 XPS 13 9320 上的 100 万像素网络摄像头。此外还内置了红外摄像头,支持 Windows Hello 面部识别功能。不过,仍然没有摄像头盖板或锁定开关。
维护
底部面板只需一把一字螺丝刀即可拆下。由于内存和 WLAN 都是焊接的,因此除了单个 M.2 固态硬盘外,没有其他可升级的地方。
可持续性
包装由 75% 的可回收材料和 25% 的可再生材料组成,可完全回收利用。同时,笔记本电脑本身的制造至少使用了 20% 的回收铝和玻璃。
配件和保修
包装盒中除了交流适配器和文件外,没有任何其他附件,而基于英特尔的 XPS 机型通常会免费提供一个 USB-C 转 USB-A 适配器。
如果在美国购买,制造商通常提供一年有限保修。
输入设备 - 以牺牲易用性为代价换取更简洁的外观
键盘
与大多数其他超极本的传统键盘相比,零格键盘需要一些时间来适应。键程甚至比通常的键盘更浅,仅为 1.0 毫米,反馈也相对较软,可带来更柔软的键入体验。在 XPS 13 9345 和 HP Spectre x360 14 上更坚硬的按键之间跳转时,两者的差异简直是天壤之别。 惠普 Spectre x360 14.
支持触摸的功能键也是喜忧参半。几年前,联想曾在 ThinkPad 系列上采用过类似的功能,但很快就放弃了。主要问题是,这些按键对最轻微的触碰都很敏感,可能导致意外输入。
触摸板
隐形 XPS 点击板因其不方便用户使用而声名狼藉,在 Snapdragon 机型上这一趋势仍在继续。虽然 13 英寸机型的可用面积相当宽敞,约为 11.5 x 7.5 厘米,但由于反馈较弱,点击效果并不令人满意。更糟糕的是,输入点击所需的力道比其他大多数笔记本电脑都要小得多,导致在你只是想移动光标时出现许多意外的点击和拖动。在使用这种设计两年后,我们希望在这方面能有所改进,但遗憾的是,情况并非如此。
显示屏
有以下三种显示屏可供选择。我们的评测配置配备了粗体选项。
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,120 赫兹,非触摸,亚光
- 2560 x 1600,IPS,120 Hz,触摸,亮面
- 2880 x 1800,OLED,60 赫兹,触摸,亮面
所有迹象都表明,我们的 120 Hz 面板与英特尔 XPS 13 所用的面板完全相同。从支持低至 30 Hz 的 VRR、足够的响应时间到 500 nit 的最大亮度,所有这些都与我们最近 Core Ultra 7 XPS 13 测试机上的功能相似。最值得注意的是,对比度几乎达到 2000:1,而其他笔记本电脑上的大多数 IPS 面板的对比度仅为 1000:1。XPS 机型的显示屏一直是同类产品中最好的,因此即使是最便宜的 IPS 显示屏,看起来也非常漂亮。
如果配置基本选项,色彩覆盖范围仅限于 >95% sRGB,而 DCI-P3 色彩则保留给价格更高的 1600p IPS 和 1800p OLED 面板。用户可能需要禁用自适应色彩功能,以防止在编辑照片时出现任何细微的色彩变化。
值得一提的是,这款面板的最低亮度为 49 尼特,相对较高,我们在酷睿 i7 机型上也注意到了这一点。相比之下,大多数其他笔记本电脑的显示屏在最低亮度设置时通常会达到 15 尼特或更低。如果在黑暗环境中观看,戴尔较高的最低亮度可能更容易造成眼睛疲劳。而 OLED 配置则不会出现这种潜在问题,因为它可以达到更暗的亮度水平。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 518.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1993:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Dell XPS 13 9345 IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4", 120 Hz | Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 SHP1593, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ LQ138P1JX61, IPS, 2304x1536, 13.8", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE LEN135WQ+, IPS, 2880x1920, 13.5", 120 Hz | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 IPS, 2240x1400, 14", 60 Hz | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 SDC417B, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 21% | -4% | 27% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 69.4 | 69.4 0% | 97.8 41% | 65.5 -6% | 99.7 44% | |
sRGB Coverage | 97.8 | 97.8 0% | 98.2 0% | 97.3 -1% | 100 2% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.7 | 71.7 0% | 87.3 22% | 67.7 -6% | 96.9 35% | |
Response Times | -25% | 5% | 32% | 27% | 94% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.2 ? | 43.2 ? -23% | 38.9 ? -11% | 27.3 ? 22% | 22.8 ? 35% | 2 ? 94% |
Response Time Black / White * | 21.8 ? | 27.6 ? -27% | 17.4 ? 20% | 12.8 ? 41% | 17.9 ? 18% | 1.6 ? 93% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | |||||
Screen | -6% | 16% | 10% | -58% | 27% | |
Brightness middle | 518.3 | 429 -17% | 606 17% | 539 4% | 341.4 -34% | 361 -30% |
Brightness | 487 | 407 -16% | 592 22% | 513 5% | 315 -35% | 365 -25% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 90 5% | 94 9% | 89 3% | 87 1% | 98 14% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.28 -8% | 0.43 -65% | 0.38 -46% | 0.39 -50% | |
Contrast | 1993 | 1532 -23% | 1409 -29% | 1418 -29% | 875 -56% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 2.6 24% | 1.3 62% | 1.4 59% | 5.63 -66% | 1.2 65% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.68 | 6.6 -16% | 2.1 63% | 3.5 38% | 11.94 -110% | 1.9 67% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 4 5% | 2.1 50% | 2.2 48% | 8.8 -110% | 1.2 71% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.19 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.27 97% |
CCT | 7235 90% | 7332 89% | 6842 95% | 6710 97% | 6034 108% | 6486 100% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.4 | 0.7 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-7% | 14% /
15% | 13% /
10% | -16% /
-41% | 49% /
39% |
* ... smaller is better
我们的 X-Rite 色差计显示,该显示器采用 sRGB 标准,平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别为 4.2 和 3.4,表现不错。不过,7235 色温略微偏冷,在饱和度较低时影响了色彩准确性。遗憾的是,戴尔没有在出厂时对面板进行校准,因为包括 i1Profiler 在内的大多数校准软件都与 ARM 不兼容。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
21.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.5 ms rise | |
↘ 11.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和 MyDell 设置为性能模式。与基于英特尔处理器的 XPS 13 上的相同软件相比,骁龙机型上的 MyDell 经过了重新设计,使用起来更加简单。该软件以前的某些功能(如 "存在检测")已移至 Windows "电源和电池 "菜单。
处理器
性能在很大程度上取决于应用程序是原生的还是仿真的。例如,该处理器在 CineBench 2024 和 GeekBench 6 中表现出色,因为两者都针对 ARM 环境进行了优化。我们的 骁龙 X 精英 X1E-80-100将优于 酷睿至尊 7 155H在这种情况下,我们的骁龙 X Elite X1E-80-100 在多线程和单线程操作方面都会优于酷睿 Ultra 7 155H。否则,模拟基准测试会将我们的骁龙 CPU 性能拉低到与较早的 酷睿 i5-1240P或 酷睿 i7-1260P.换句话说,高通处理器可以与酷睿 i7 155H 相媲美,正如制造商所宣称的那样,但必须在适当的条件和应用下才能体现出这些优势。
骁龙处理器之间的性能一致性也很难衡量。举例来说,我们的骁龙 X Elite X1E-80-100 可以轻松超越 骁龙 X 精英 X1E-78-100在 EliteBook Ultra G1q 14在 CineBench 2024 中的表现,但在 CineBench R23 和 R15 中的表现却恰恰相反。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P -4! | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED -4! | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K -4! | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p -4! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U -4! | |
Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U -8! | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K -4! | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED -4! | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 -5! | |
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD -6! |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (621 - 927, n=5) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (122 - 123, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (14234 - 14646, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2751 - 2845, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (51.7 - 98.5, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21N10007GE | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 4K | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2184 - 7339, n=5) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (5687 - 26391, n=5) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2607 - 2949, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (68253 - 69762, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (1521 - 2357, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (10117 - 15669, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (39956 - 71089, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (398 - 802, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2581 - 4044, n=5) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (28474 - 38707, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
系统性能
WebXPRT 和 Kraken(可在针对 ARM 进行优化的 Edge 浏览器上原生运行)都将我们的高通 XPS 排在了英特尔 XPS 之前,而且幅度相当大。
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark / Overall | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1356 - 1443, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1271 - 1375, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1492 - 1537, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1237 - 1401, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (430 - 455, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (295 - 324, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (391 - 422, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (44795 - 63495, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (58855 - 125604, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (37270 - 45265, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (7.4 - 8.8, n=5) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
戴尔的固态硬盘来自不同的制造商,因此在购买前很难知道自己买到的是什么硬盘。例如,我们在 10 多台不同的内部 XPS 13 设备上使用过美光、三星、西部数据、东芝和 SK Hynix 的硬盘。我们的特定高通设备配备了中端 WD SN740,提供高达 5000 MB/s 的稳定传输速率。尽管固态硬盘的长度只有 42 毫米,但我们没有观察到节流现象,这可能部分归功于随附的固态硬盘散热器。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
模拟 3DMark 的图形性能与 Iris Xe 96 EUs但远远落后于 Arc 8或 Radeon 680M/780M 系列的差距高达 20% 至 40%。不过,其性能始终优于 HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14即使平均差距很小。
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 6283 | 17318 | 2611 |
平衡模式 | 6209 | 18348 | 2643 |
电池供电 | 6287 | 18156 | 2687 |
在性能模式、平衡模式或电池供电模式之间切换时,性能没有明显下降,如Fire Strike 上表所示。
3DMark 11 Performance | 6884 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24813 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6012 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1900 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
与 EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 相比,我们的 3DMark 成绩略高,因此在下面的测试中性能略快。有趣的是,有些游戏可以在戴尔设备上运行,但不能在惠普设备上运行,反之亦然。例如,《孤岛惊魂 5》可以在戴尔设备上运行,但不能在惠普设备上运行;《博德之门 3》可以在惠普设备上运行,但不能在戴尔设备上运行,无论采用何种 DirectX 模式。这种差异可能是由于两款机型的驱动程序不同造成的,但这也表明在图形驱动程序方面还需要做更多的工作。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE -2! | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 -2! | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ -2! | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 -1! | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 -1! |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands - 1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
F1 22 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (67.6 - 72.9, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (41.5 - 44.5, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (30.8 - 33.6, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (20.6 - 22.4, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Dell XPS 13 9345 | |
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (16.8 - 18, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 96.3 | 94.2 | 49.5 | 21.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 104 | 74.5 | 43.7 | 19.2 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 80 | 60.7 | 57.4 | 50.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 56.1 | 25 | 15.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 38 | |||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 42 | 33 | 31 | 28 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 123.9 | 50.8 | 41.8 | 33.9 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 44.5 | 33.6 | 22.4 | 18 |
F1 22 (2022) | 62.9 | 55.4 | 38.5 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 24.1 | 19.5 | 16.9 | 14.7 |
排放量
系统噪音 - 风扇活动更轻松
风扇噪音比 英特尔酷睿至尊 7风扇噪音比英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 型号略小,这是因为内部风扇在负载增加时转速上升较慢。否则,当长时间运行高负载时,两款机型的风扇都会稳定在相似的最大转速。例如,在 3DMark 06 第一个 90 秒基准场景结束时,风扇噪音最高可达 32.8 dB(A),而英特尔机型在类似条件下为 37.4 dB(A)。不过,在运行《赛博朋克 2077》等游戏时,两款机型的噪音都在 40 分贝(A)左右。在运行高负载时,高通系统并不一定更安静,但在浏览网页或视频流时,你也不太可能注意到任何风扇活动。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 22.9 / 22.9 / 22.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.8 / 40.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.9 dB(A) |
Dell XPS 13 9345 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100 | Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2550 512GB | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV | Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL8512HDLU | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | 4% | -7% | 4% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 22.9 | 25.1 -10% | 23.8 -4% | 24.5 -7% | 23.4 -2% | 23.3 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 22.9 | 25.1 -10% | 23.8 -4% | 24.5 -7% | 23.4 -2% | 23.3 -2% |
Idle Average * | 22.9 | 25.1 -10% | 23.8 -4% | 24.5 -7% | 23.4 -2% | 23.3 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.9 | 25.1 -10% | 23.8 -4% | 27.1 -18% | 24.3 -6% | 23.3 -2% |
Load Average * | 32.8 | 37.4 -14% | 26 21% | 33.3 -2% | 25 24% | 37.7 -15% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 40.6 | 31.5 22% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 40.6 | 42.5 -5% | 40.3 1% | 40.7 -0% | 34.8 14% | 40.1 1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.5 | 36.8 | 30.6 | 40.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度与我们在搭载英特尔处理器的 XPS 13 9340 上记录的温度非常接近,这表明尽管更换了处理器,高通机型的运行温度并没有明显升高或降低。系统中心的热点温度最高可达 45 摄氏度,这与英特尔机型在长时间运行苛刻负载时的温度相近。平均温度比我们在 微软 Surface 笔记本电脑 7 13.8但比 惠普 EliteBook Ultra G1q 14这两款笔记本都采用了类似的骁龙精英处理器。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.4 °C / 93.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
Dell XPS 13 9345 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 12% | 9% | 9% | 4% | 6% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45.2 | 41 9% | 47.1 -4% | 43.1 5% | 40.8 10% | 43.1 5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44.2 | 43.5 2% | 44.6 -1% | 39.2 11% | 40.4 9% | 45 -2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30.4 | 25.3 17% | 24.7 19% | 28.3 7% | 32.2 -6% | 27.3 10% |
Idle Bottom * | 31.6 | 25.5 19% | 24.5 22% | 28 11% | 31.2 1% | 27.8 12% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Dell XPS 13 9345 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
功耗测量结果显示了一些有趣的结果,与 Core Ultra 7 XPS 13.在运行中等或较低负载时,我们的骁龙 XPS 13 所需的功耗始终低于英特尔版本,这为延长电池寿命铺平了道路,下文将举例说明。不过,在运行游戏等要求较高的负载时,尽管酷睿 Ultra 7 的图形处理性能通常更快,但平均功耗却大致相同,都在 40 W 左右。
运行 Prime95 对 CPU 施加压力时的功耗显示,骁龙机型的平均功耗高于英特尔机型,因为后者会随着时间的推移节流更快。另一方面,在运行 FurMark 对 GPU 进行压力测试时,平均耗电量仅为 18 W,而英特尔机型则为 34 W 或更高。这表明高通公司在集成 GPU 设计上投入的表面积或硅片预算可能比竞争对手 Arc 8 系列更少,后者的性能更强,平均要求更高。
与英特尔机型一样,使用超小(约 6.5 x 5.5 x 2.3 厘米)的 65 W USB-C AC 适配器,最大功耗可达 64 W。
Off / Standby | 0.29 / 0.8 Watt |
Idle | 2.8 / 4.9 / 5.7 Watt |
Load |
40.6 / 64 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell XPS 13 9345 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, , IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2550 512GB, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2304x1536, 13.8" | Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL8512HDLU, IPS, 2880x1920, 13.5" | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -27% | 11% | -48% | 11% | -43% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.8 | 3.8 -36% | 1.4 50% | 5.4 -93% | 2.5 11% | 5.8 -107% |
Idle Average * | 4.9 | 7 -43% | 6.3 -29% | 7.8 -59% | 5.7 -16% | 8.5 -73% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.7 | 7.3 -28% | 7.6 -33% | 8.9 -56% | 5.8 -2% | 8.8 -54% |
Load Average * | 40.6 | 52.6 -30% | 26.9 34% | 49.4 -22% | 24.2 40% | 35.1 14% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 39.4 | 26.8 32% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 40.7 | 38.5 5% | 33.5 18% | |||
Load Maximum * | 64 | 62.7 2% | 40.7 36% | 68.8 -8% | 66.4 -4% | 59.5 7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.3 | 44.4 | 23.1 | 27.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
如果说该系统有什么明显的优势,那一定是电池续航时间。我们记录的实际 WLAN 浏览时间接近 26.5 小时,比配备酷睿至尊 7 155H 和相同 1200p IPS 显示屏的 XPS 13 9340 多出 2 倍。如果配置的是 OLED 面板,运行时间肯定会缩短,但仍然是难以置信的长,是所有 13 英寸子笔记本中最长的之一,甚至包括 MacBook Air 系列.
我们的测试是在应用了戴尔最新的 BIOS 更新后进行的,该更新专门用于改善骁龙机型的电池续航时间。我们建议在这里安装更新。
从空电到满电需要 90 多分钟,这在大多数笔记本电脑上都很常见。
Dell XPS 13 9345 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 55 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 55 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 54 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 13x G4 21KR0008GE Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, 74 Wh | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 59 Wh | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 63 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 40% | -3% | 24% | 4% | 50% | |
Reader / Idle | 2785 | 1222 -56% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 1585 | 769 -51% | 852 -46% | 684 -57% | 792 -50% | 678 -57% |
Load | 57 | 131 130% | 80 40% | 116 104% | 124 118% | 146 156% |
H.264 | 1053 | 1181 | 1229 | 829 |
Pros
Cons
结论--英特尔 XPS 13 的值得尊敬的替代品
1300 美元的骁龙 XPS 13 比 1400 美元的 Core Ultra 7 XPS 13而电池续航时间、Co-Pilot+ 集成和相同的硬件功能却明显更长。不过,实际的用户体验在很大程度上取决于工作负载和应用程序。如果主要用于浏览、文字处理、视频和流媒体,那么骁龙 XPS 13 的效率往往更高,尤其是当程序可以在 ARM 上原生运行时。另一方面,要求更高的任务,如图形编辑、视频编码、雷电对接或必须在 ARM 上模拟的特定应用程序,则最适合使用传统的英特尔 XPS 13。为此,英特尔机型在所有使用场景中都能提供更可预测的性能水平,这可以说超过了骁龙机型可能领先的少数边缘情况。
与英特尔 XPS 13 相比,骁龙 XPS 13 的性价比非常高。不过,用户体验会有很大不同,这取决于你打算使用该系统的应用程序和任务类型。
英特尔 XPS 13 的电池续航时间已经相当不错,而且未来英特尔和 AMD CPU 也将采用 Co-Pilot+ 技术,因此电池续航时间和 Co-Pilot+ 兼容性方面的优势可能不足以说服买家。不过,那些希望最大限度延长运行时间并体验微软最新人工智能功能的用户可能会发现,骁龙 XPS 13 是更具生产力的选择。
价格和供应情况
戴尔现在出货的XPS 13 9345 配置价格为 1300 美元,如果配置 OLED 面板,价格则高达 1800 美元以上。
Dell XPS 13 9345
- 08/04/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.