GPD Win Mini Zen 4 手持设备评测:华硕 ROG Ally 的可靠替代品
Win Mini 是 GPD 最新推出的 PC 游戏掌上电脑,早在 Valve 和华硕普及这一概念之前,GPD 就已经专注于这一领域。继 Pocket 3 和 Win Max 2 之后,这款最新产品又采用了全新设计和最新的 AI 就绪 Zen 4 AMD 芯片组。
我们这次评测的是高端配置,配备鹰点 Ryzen 7 8840U CPU、集成 Radeon 780M GPU、32 GB 焊接 LPDDR5 6400 MT/s 内存和 512 GB SSD。其他 SKU 可能会配备速度较慢的 Ryzen 5 8640U 和 Radeon 760M 图形处理器,或者有更高的 2 TB 存储选项。
Win Mini 的竞争对手包括其他 Windows PC 游戏掌上电脑,如 联想Legion GoValve Steam Deck、 华硕 ROG Ally或 Aokzoe A1.不过,Win Mini 的独特之处在于,它在提供常用游戏控制器按钮的同时,还集成了一个 QWERTY 全键盘。
更多 GPD 评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
76.9 % | 06 / 2024 | GPD Win Mini 2024 7" R7 8840U, Radeon 780M | 526 g | 26 mm | 7.00" | 1920x1080 | |
80.3 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 607 g | 28 mm | 6.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.5 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | GPD Win Max 2 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 23 mm | 10.10" | 2560x1600 | |
80.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Aokzoe A1 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 735 g | 21 mm | 8.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | 611 g | 21.22 mm | 7.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.9 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | 845 g | 41 mm | 8.80" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 任天堂 DS Vibes
由于 Win Mini 的零售价高达 1000 美元或更高,因此其制造质量必须非常出色,才能证明其相对高昂的价格是合理的。值得庆幸的是,自 Win 3时代以来,GPD 已经取得了长足的进步,这一点在 Win Mini 上得到了真实的体现。当试图扭动设备时,几乎不会出现翘曲和吱吱作响的情况,而所有按键和按键都很坚固,给人留下了坚实的第一印象。即使从人体工学角度看,Win Mini 的控制键握起来可能不太舒适,但它仍能与大型制造商生产的流行掌上电脑相媲美。
由于采用了蛤壳式设计,该系统的紧凑程度令人惊讶。而 ROG Ally 或 Legion Go的控制器按钮位于屏幕边缘,而 Win Mini 的按钮则位于 C 盖上,从而减少了整体占地面积。华硕的设计略显单薄,但在重量和体积方面,GPD 的优势更为明显。
连接性 - 终于有了 USB-A
就尺寸而言,USB-A 端口是最值得注意的,因为Legion Go 和 ROG Ally 等流行的手持设备上都没有这个端口。双 USB-C 端口可实现更多功能的对接和充电,包括通过 USB4 兼容大多数 eGPU。通过 USB-C DP 支持外接显示器。
没有集成网络摄像头。
SD 读卡器
即使使用我们的 UHS-II 测试卡,MicroSD 读卡器的速度也比 GPD 宣传的要慢。制造商宣称读取速度为 120 MB/s,但我们在实际测试中只能达到 21 到 86 MB/s。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
GPD Win Max 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Aokzoe A1 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
GPD Win Max 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Aokzoe A1 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
交流
该设备配备了与Legion Go 或 Win 4 相同的英特尔 AX210,最高可连接 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.2。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win 4 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 |
维护
底部面板由八颗小十字螺丝固定,拆卸相对容易。不过,只有 M.2 2230 固态硬盘可以升级,因为内存和 WLAN 模块是焊接的。
配件和保修
可选配可拆卸的塑料控制器手柄,以改善游戏时的人体工学设计。如果在美国购买,制造商提供标准的一年有限保修服务。
输入设备 - 人体工程学平均值
键盘
键盘设计在 UMPC 外形上变得非常棘手,这一点在迄今为止所有的 GDP 产品上都很明显。而 Pocket 3采用了类似笔记本电脑的传统塑料 Chiclet 键,而 Win Mini 则采用了类似旧款黑莓手机或旧款三星滑盖手机的橡胶斜面键。因此,在 Win Mini 上无法快速打字,这意味着在进行任何文字处理时,强烈建议使用外置 USB 或蓝牙键盘。此外,打字时几乎完全没有声音。
游戏板
集成的按键则喜忧参半。如果你习惯使用 Switch 控制器,按键的小尺寸并不是问题,但按键的位置和触感则需要适应。尤其是方向键和面部按键,与大多数其他控制器相比,它们的位置更靠近设备中心,这意味着你必须比平时更用力地伸展拇指才能触碰到它们。按下按钮时的反馈也比 Switch 或 Playstation 控制器更软、更浅。对于较短的游戏时间来说,这种体验还是令人满意的,但与 Valve、华硕或其他公司的 "正规 "游戏掌机相比,还是逊色不少。甚至连 Win Max上的按键也比 Win Mini 上的更坚固,反馈更强烈。
触摸板
与键盘一样,小巧的多点触摸板(4.8 x 3.9 厘米)只能偶尔使用,或作为触摸屏或操纵杆的辅助输入方法。我们发现,直接触摸显示屏要简单得多,尤其是触摸板没有集成鼠标触感键,点击不可靠。对于涉及电子表格或光标精度的工作负载,外接鼠标就显得尤为重要。
显示屏 - 华硕 ROG Ally 体验
Win Mini 采用与华硕 ROG Ally 相同的 TL070FVSX01-0 IPS 面板。 华硕 ROG Ally 两款机型的观看体验非常相似。我们的独立测量结果表明,两者的色彩覆盖率、黑白响应时间、亮度水平等几乎相同。GPD 支持 FreeSync Premium 和 120 Hz 原生刷新率,Windows VRR 可低至 60 Hz - 就像华硕的一样。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 493 cd/m²
Contrast: 1049:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | GPD Win 4 G1618-04, IPS, 1920x1080, 6" | GPD Win Max 2 Toshiba HX_10.1_LCD, IPS, 2560x1600, 10.1" | Aokzoe A1 BOE0207, IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | Lenovo Legion Go Legion Go Display, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | 2% | 7% | 0% | 28% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.8 | 63.1 -3% | 69.8 8% | 72.3 12% | 65.6 1% | 92.1 42% |
sRGB Coverage | 93.3 | 92 -1% | 91 -2% | 92.6 -1% | 92.1 -1% | 99.56 7% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67 | 64.6 -4% | 66.6 -1% | 73.4 10% | 67.9 1% | 90.09 34% |
Response Times | -217% | -168% | -230% | -7% | -132% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8.9 ? | 26.8 ? -201% | 21.2 ? -138% | 28.9 ? -225% | 10.5 ? -18% | 20.8 ? -134% |
Response Time Black / White * | 6.3 ? | 20.9 ? -232% | 18.7 ? -197% | 21.1 ? -235% | 6 ? 5% | 14.4 ? -129% |
PWM Frequency | 9970.7 | 700 | ||||
Screen | -50% | -30% | -83% | -7% | -33% | |
Brightness middle | 493 | 413.1 -16% | 396.7 -20% | 328.4 -33% | 513 4% | 411 -17% |
Brightness | 470 | 407 -13% | 381 -19% | 323 -31% | 474 1% | 413 -12% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 81 -6% | 89 3% | 92 7% | 84 -2% | 80 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.39 17% | 0.36 23% | 0.39 17% | 0.38 19% | 0.42 11% |
Contrast | 1049 | 1059 1% | 1102 5% | 842 -20% | 1350 29% | 979 -7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.36 | 6.97 -195% | 6.31 -167% | 10.17 -331% | 3.7 -57% | 5.94 -152% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.36 | 14.11 -122% | 10.23 -61% | 18.14 -185% | 8.3 -31% | 10.56 -66% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.3 | 1.24 5% | 1.44 -11% | 1.07 18% | 2.95 -127% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 9.9 -125% | 5.5 -25% | 12.7 -189% | 5.1 -16% | 0.92 79% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.04 108% | 2.17 101% | 2.7 81% | 2.14 103% | 1.93 114% |
CCT | 7142 91% | 9571 68% | 7502 87% | 12502 52% | 7732 84% | 8064 81% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -90% /
-64% | -65% /
-43% | -102% /
-85% | -5% /
-5% | -46% /
-34% |
* ... smaller is better
卡尔曼测试结果显示色温略微偏冷,但灰度和色彩准确度尚可。不过,适当的校准可以将平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别从 4.4 和 2.36 降低到 2.1 和 1.3。我们建议使用上述经过校准的 ICM 配置文件,以充分发挥 sRGB 显示屏的性能。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
6.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.4 ms rise | |
↘ 2.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
8.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.1 ms rise | |
↘ 4.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
虽然 500 尼特的亮度比许多其他手持设备(如Win 4、Aokzoe A1 或Legion Go 相比,500 尼特的亮度仍然不足以克服户外眩光。在大多数室外条件下,在室内原本鲜艳的屏幕会变得暗淡无光。对于文字尺寸特别小的小屏幕来说,屏幕的亮度必须达到一些智能手机的水平,1000 尼特或更高的亮度已成为普遍现象。
性能 - 支持人工智能的 AMD Zen 4 CPU
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。
处理器
Win Mini 采用与 Ryzen 7 8840U处理器。 Minisforum V3 可转换.不过,由于我们的 7 英寸外形尺寸要小得多,因此原始多线程性能要慢 20% 至 25%,整体性能与两年前的 Ryzen 7 6800U.即使是在上一代 Ryzen 7 7840U 上运行的 Ayaneo Kun Ryzen 7 7840U也能比我们采用最新 Ryzen 7 8840U 的 GPD 机型快 50%。与采用类似处理器的竞争对手相比,制造商几乎可以肯定 AMD 芯片的超频不足。
此外,正如我们下面的 CineBench R15 xT 循环测试结果所示,Turbo Core 性能基本不存在。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Legion Go -2! | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 -2! | |
GPD Win Max 2 -2! | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 -3! | |
GPD Win Max 2021 -4! |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (3987 - 5067, n=3) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Minisforum V3 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (427 - 670, n=3) | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (1539 - 2024, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Minisforum V3 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (176.6 - 268, n=3) | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (239 - 315, n=3) | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Kun |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Minisforum V3 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (4168 - 6064, n=3) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (9609 - 11144, n=3) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Ayaneo Kun |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (1654 - 2537, n=3) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Aokzoe A1 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (12.5 - 16.5, n=3) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (49.2 - 63.8, n=3) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (0.4765 - 0.678, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Minisforum V3 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (15166 - 20723, n=3) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (64229 - 87120, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (3156 - 3896, n=3) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (76873 - 95165, n=3) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (10289 - 13143, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (34209 - 45793, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (70017 - 119040, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (654 - 869, n=3) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (7715 - 10812, n=3) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (37635 - 38939, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 |
压力测试
在运行 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 会升至 2.2 GHz、61 C 和 15 W,在测试的其余时间里没有进一步下降或上升。这一观察结果补充了上文 CineBench R15 xT 的平缓结果和下文相对较低的功耗水平。有限的 15 W 功耗包络线显然令人失望,因为 Ryzen U 系列 CPU 在笔记本电脑(如 HPPavilion Plus 14相比之下,Ryzen U 系列 CPU 的功耗通常超过 25 W。
运行时 Witcher 3时,图形处理器的频率为 1289 至 1499 MHz,而上述惠普笔记本电脑的频率则稳定在 1833 MHz。在这种情况下,制造商强制要求的低频显而易见。
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 38 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.2 | -- | 61 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.3 | 800 | 59 |
Witcher 3 压力 | 0.5 | 1289 - 1499 | 59 |
系统性能
PCMark 结果可与其他高端手持设备媲美,包括 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme 和 GoGo。 Legion 去.不过,其数字内容创建子分数明显稍慢,这反映出 Win Mini 的 GPU 性能稍慢。
有趣的是,WebXPRT 4 在多次重新运行后总是会挂起,因此这一分数被省略了。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (5940 - 7098, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (9541 - 10664, n=3) | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Lenovo Legion Go |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (7522 - 10386, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (7690 - 8762, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1541 - 1566, n=2) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Aokzoe A1 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1514 - 1520, n=2) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1677 - 1726, n=2) | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1262 - 1280, n=2) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (216 - 306, n=3) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (170.4 - 248, n=2) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M (515 - 779, n=3) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6643 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (65911 - 69310, n=3) | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (49381 - 49784, n=3) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (83400 - 92722, n=3) | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (118.8 - 133.7, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开主页的多个浏览器标签时,LatencyMon 显示了 DPC 问题。60 FPS 的 4K 视频回放也不完美,在 60 秒的时间内记录到 3 次丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Aokzoe A1 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配备了小型 M.2 2230 Kioxia KBG50ZNS512GPCIe4 NVMe 固态硬盘,它也可以在一些全尺寸笔记本电脑上找到,包括戴尔 Inspiron 16 7635 2 合 1 或 惠普 ProBook 445 G10.不过,与全长的 M.2 2280 硬盘不同,较短的 2230 硬盘由于密度较高,在负载情况下更容易出现节流。例如,在循环运行 DiskSpd 时,传输速率在开始的一分钟左右会达到 2400 MB/s,然后在压力测试的剩余时间内稳步下降到 1300 MB/s。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" -11! |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能 - Radeon 780M 是手持设备的理想之选
集成的 Radeon 780M Win Mini 中集成的 Radeon 780M 比我们数据库中配备相同 GPU 的普通笔记本电脑要慢 10% 到 15%。由于外形小巧,这也许并不出乎意料,但其他游戏掌上电脑的性能还是超过了我们的 GPD。比如联想Legion Go 和 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme,根据 3DMark 的测试结果,它们的运行速度都能提高 10% 到 20%。如上所述,整体性能较慢的原因可能是 CPU 的 TDP 上限较低。
幸运的是,Win Mini 仍然比英特尔上一代的 Iris Xe 96 EUs快约 40%至 50%。
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 6683 | 18658 | 2403 |
均衡模式 | 6726 (-1%) | 18475 (-1%) | 2413 (-0%) |
电池电量 | 6467 (-3%) | 18376 (-2%) | 2397 (-0%) |
如Fire Strike 上表所示,在平衡模式而非性能模式下运行不会造成显著的性能损失。使用电池供电对性能的影响稍大,尽管只是几个百分点。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA -1! | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme -1! | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M | |
Aokzoe A1 -1! | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 -1! | |
GPD Win 4 -1! | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 10053 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28272 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6177 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2688 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 435 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
实际游戏中的性能反映了上述 3DMark 分数,GPD 始终比许多竞争对手慢一些。这在《赛博朋克 2077》或《F1 22 》等游戏中最为明显。 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme或Legion Go 在相同的图形设置下可以快 20% 至 40%。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (62.6 - 151.2, n=21) | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (34.3 - 77.7, n=21) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (28.4 - 55.9, n=21) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (18.6 - 38.8, n=21) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (16.5 - 31.3, n=21) | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" |
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (74 - 163.3, n=37) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (47.7 - 103.8, n=21) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (21.3 - 52.2, n=45) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (14.3 - 36, n=47) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (30.7 - 67.4, n=12) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
1920x1080 Low Preset | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (20.2 - 43.9, n=20) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (15.7 - 36.8, n=22) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (13.8 - 29.9, n=22) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (13.4 - 29.2, n=22) | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" |
F1 22 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (85.4 - 186.7, n=25) | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (47 - 109.9, n=31) | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (41.5 - 95, n=31) | |
Minisforum V3 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (31.7 - 70.6, n=31) | |
Minisforum V3 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (9.92 - 19.2, n=23) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
One Netbook XPlayer 2 | |
GPD Win 4 | |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" |
不幸的是,在 Witcher 3测试帧速率稳定性时发现,Win Mini 与去年的 Win 4.这个问题曾在上被 Win 4 用户广泛报道。因此,在 Win Mini 上再次出现这一问题令人失望。如下图所示,帧速率会在 40 到 45 FPS 之间无故循环。FreeSync 有助于避免屏幕撕裂问题,但不稳定的帧速率本应首先避免。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 120.3 | 76.5 | 41.5 | 25.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 107.9 | 84.3 | 67.8 | 62.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 63.2 | 32.3 | 24.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 48.1 | 33.1 | 27.4 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 60 | 38 | 36 | 34 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 143.2 | 59.7 | 49.7 | 42.6 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 51.6 | 39.9 | 24.9 | 22.2 |
F1 22 (2022) | 72.2 | 65.2 | 46.6 | 12.4 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 30.2 | 24.3 | 21.1 | 20.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 32.7 | 24.8 | 20.1 | 16.9 |
排放 - 风扇越小 = 间距越大
系统噪音
将专为笔记本电脑设计的 U 系列处理器装入便携式 7 英寸机箱,对散热解决方案造成了很大压力。因此,Win Mini 的 35 毫米小风扇无论屏幕负载如何,都不会停止运转,这一点也不足为奇。在桌面上空转时,风扇噪音很小,但在播放视频或浏览网页时,即使在节能模式下,噪音也会迅速变大,达到 30 分贝(A)左右。
玩游戏时,Win Mini 的噪音比 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme 大,但比 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme 安静。 Legion 去.我们希望在该机型的未来版本中采用更大直径的风扇,以降低音调。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.7 / 26.2 / 28 dB(A) |
Load |
| 34.2 / 42.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.2 dB(A) |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G | GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB | GPD Win Max 2 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB | Aokzoe A1 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM | Lenovo Legion Go Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -18% | 3% | -6% | 4% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 24.2 | 24 1% | 22.6 7% | 23 5% | 23.3 4% | 23 5% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 31.2 -26% | 23.7 4% | 23.3 6% | 23.3 6% | 23 7% |
Idle Average * | 26.2 | 31.2 -19% | 23.7 10% | 27.1 -3% | 23.3 11% | 23 12% |
Idle Maximum * | 28 | 33.5 -20% | 28.5 -2% | 37.3 -33% | 27.3 2% | 25 11% |
Load Average * | 34.2 | 45.5 -33% | 36.5 -7% | 37.4 -9% | 39.2 -15% | 37 -8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43 | 48.6 -13% | 39.8 7% | 41.2 4% | 39.2 9% | 46 -7% |
Load Maximum * | 42.5 | 49 -15% | 40.5 5% | 46.2 -9% | 39.2 8% | 37 13% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
游戏时,键盘上方的机箱后半部分温度会超过 46 摄氏度。由于触控板和控制器按键位于此处,如果游戏需要面部按键控制,用户应做好手指出汗的准备。相反,操纵杆和肩部按键的温度要低得多,使用起来也更舒适。与 ROG Ally 或 Aokzoe设计相比仍不理想,但这也是拥有完全集成的控制器和 QWERTY 键盘一体机的折衷方案。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 38.5 °C / 101 F, ranging from 28 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 37.4 °C / 99 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 34.2 °C / 94 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.6 °C / 90.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 31.9 °C / 89.4 F (-0.7 °C / -1.3 F).
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M | GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Aokzoe A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo Legion Go AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 27% | 28% | 4% | 13% | ||
Maximum Upper Side * | 46.6 | 35 25% | 28.6 39% | 41.6 11% | 44.4 5% | |
Maximum Bottom * | 48 | 26.8 44% | 33 31% | 41.6 13% | 37.9 21% | |
Idle Upper Side * | 32.6 | 28.4 13% | 24.6 25% | 34.8 -7% | 29.9 8% | |
Idle Bottom * | 33.6 | 25 26% | 27.6 18% | 33.6 -0% | 28.3 16% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--节约能源,延长运行时间
耗电量
即使在玩游戏或运行高负载时,功耗也比预期的要低。Witcher 3例如,尽管 Win 4 和 Prime95 的游戏性能相近,但两者的功耗仅为 33 瓦,而 Win 4 则为 45 瓦至 54 瓦。Zen 3+ Rembrandt 和 Zen 4 Hawk Point 的每瓦性能显然有了显著提升,这也解释了下文中令人印象深刻的电池续航时间。
在运行 Prime95 压力测试时,我们可以记录到小型(约 6 x 6 x 2.9 厘米)65 瓦 USB-C 插头交流适配器的最大功耗为 35 瓦。如果同时进行充电和游戏,耗电量可能会达到 50 W 以上,以确保在大量使用时有足够的充电电量。
Off / Standby | 1.3 / 1.7 Watt |
Idle | 6.1 / 7.9 / 9 Watt |
Load |
32.6 / 34.9 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 6" | GPD Win Max 2 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 10.1" | Aokzoe A1 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, , IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -44% | -43% | -46% | -29% | -59% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.1 | 7.5 -23% | 5.8 5% | 8.8 -44% | 4.2 31% | 11.5 -89% |
Idle Average * | 7.9 | 12.4 -57% | 10.2 -29% | 11.3 -43% | 6.1 23% | 12 -52% |
Idle Maximum * | 9 | 13 -44% | 11.5 -28% | 11.5 -28% | 6.3 30% | 17.4 -93% |
Load Average * | 32.6 | 46 -41% | 47.7 -46% | 32.1 2% | 56.6 -74% | 45 -38% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 33.3 | 45.2 -36% | 45.6 -37% | 58.3 -75% | 64.1 -92% | 42.6 -28% |
Load Maximum * | 34.9 | 56 -60% | 76.8 -120% | 64.5 -85% | 67.2 -93% | 54 -55% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
尽管电池容量只有 46 Wh,但运行时间却相当长。在平衡模式下浏览网页将持续 8.5 个多小时,比 Win 4 和 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme.但是,如果玩游戏,运行时间将降至 90 分钟。
遗憾的是,从空电到满电需要 2 个多小时,比其他大多数笔记本电脑的 90 分钟要慢得多。因此,在玩游戏时,电池充电时间可能比实际电池使用时间更长。
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, 44 Wh | GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 46 Wh | GPD Win Max 2 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh | Aokzoe A1 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 65 Wh | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 49.2 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -22% | 5% | -32% | -10% | -31% | |
Reader / Idle | 861 | 581 -33% | 923 7% | 431 -50% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 518 | 450 -13% | 523 1% | 381 -26% | 465 -10% | 358 -31% |
Load | 96 | 77 -20% | 103 7% | 78 -19% | ||
H.264 | 568 | |||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 57 | |||||
Gaming | 97 |
Pros
Cons
结论--万事通,无师自通
与其他游戏掌上电脑相比,Win Mini 有许多引人注目的功能。也许最重要的是,它的蛤壳式设计和集成键盘可以说更方便旅行,对于那些希望 UMPC 既能玩游戏又能偶尔执行办公任务的用户来说,它的功能也更全面。对于像 GPD 这样知名度较低的品牌的小型机来说,其机箱刚性甚至电池续航时间都出乎意料地好。与目前流行的手持设备相比,GPD 的制造质量、显示屏质量和核心规格等关键指标都很有竞争力。 华硕, 联想华硕、联想、Valve、微星和其他品牌的热门掌上电脑相比,GPD Win Mini 具有很强的竞争力。
GPD Win Mini 的突出设计和集成按键给人豪华和多功能的感觉。不过,就游戏性能和人体工学而言,它还达不到价格较低的 Steam Deck 或 ROG Ally 的水平。
另一方面,GPD 手持设备也存在着传统的 "万金油、无主宰 "问题,即某些方面因其控制器和键盘的两用设计而被牺牲。更具体地说,CPU 和 GPU 性能比其他大多数掌上电脑慢一到两步,而手柄和键盘长时间使用也不是很舒适。如上文所述,可选配可拆卸手柄,但这时你还不如在包里放一个外接鼠标、小型蓝牙键盘或专用控制器。
Win Mini 的其他方面也值得进一步微调,包括高音调的风扇噪音、不稳定的帧速率和不完美的 4K60 视频播放。不过,该机型最大的缺点可能是要价太高,超过 1000 美元,而市场上更快的游戏手持设备只需几百美元就能买到。因此,您必须真正看重它的集成键盘和蛤壳式设计,才能证明其溢价是合理的。
价格和供应情况
亚马逊现已开始销售配备 Ryzen 7840U、32 GB 内存和 2 TB SSD 的 GPD Win Mini,售价为 1050 美元。
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
- 06/12/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.