联想 ThinkPad X1 Fold 16 笔记本电脑评测:展开未来
联想是最早推出可折叠笔记本电脑的主要制造商之一,其 2021 年推出的 13 英寸笔记本电脑 ThinkPad X1 Fold 13.虽然它的酷炫程度毋庸置疑,但其有限的性能和人体工学设计让人感觉该系统更像是试验品,而不是精致的产品。2024 年,联想从 ThinkPad X1 Fold 13 中吸取经验教训,推出了更大的 16 英寸 4:3 ThinkPad X1 Fold 16。
我们的评测配置配备了酷睿7-1250U,但其他型号也有配备酷睿i7-1260U vPro和WWAN的产品,以满足大型企业的需求。所有配置都采用了同样引人注目的 16.3 英寸 2560 x 2024 可折叠触摸屏。
ThinkPad X1 Fold 16 的直接竞争对手包括 华硕 Zenbook 17 折叠本 和惠普 Spectre Foldable 17。它也可以被视为 微软 Surface Pro 系列.
更多联想评测:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 i7-1250U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.9 kg | 8.6 mm | 16.30" | 2560x2024 | |
77.8 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE i5-L16G7, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 11.5 mm | 13.30" | 2048x1536 | |
84.5 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 i7-1250U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.8 kg | 12.9 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1920 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 877 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" | 2880x1920 | |
90.3 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 17.8 mm | 13.50" | 1920x1280 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 15.36 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 将书籍融入 ThinkBook
底盘保留了 2021 型号的黑灰配色,但增加了编织物,给人更专业、更 "行政 "的感觉。最值得注意的是,在 "合上书本 "的状态下,屏幕之间不再有难看的缝隙,从而使设计更加扁平和简洁。
底盘刚性也非常出色。在对机身背面或触摸屏施加压力或试图从四角扭转机身时,几乎没有明显的弯曲。在扭动时,我们可以听到一点吱吱嘎嘎的声音,但这很轻微,不足为虑。毋庸置疑,与原版相比,无论是视觉设计还是材料硬度都有了很大的提升。
某些方面还可以做得更好。首先,打开平板电脑的难度较大,因为光滑的边缘没有握把。其次,铰链的最大角度接近 178 或 179 度,而不是完整的 180 度。这听起来很小,但这一限制足以让中间的折痕在使用过程中更加明显。
折叠打开后,联想平板电脑变得和传统平板电脑一样薄,但体积更大,重量也更重,达到 1.3 千克。不过,作为一款 Windows 设备,随机附带的蓝牙键盘对操作性至关重要,因为该操作系统不像Android 或 iOS 那样针对触摸进行了优化。因此,平板电脑、键盘和脚架的总重量实际上与像戴尔 XPS 15 这样的全功能笔记本电脑一样重。 戴尔 XPS 15.
就平板电脑本身而言,其重量比 Zenbook 17 折叠本还明显更小更薄。即便如此,它还是不适合旅行,因为大多数人都希望带上独立的键盘和脚架。
可折叠平板电脑 | 蓝牙键盘 | 后盖/脚架 | 总重量 |
1299 g | 327 g | 293 g | 1919 g |
连接性
联想有三个 USB-C 端口,而 Zenbook 17 Fold 只有两个。不过,作为回报,联想缺少一个 3.5 毫米音频插孔,这可能会让一些用户感到不悦。不过,我们还是很欣赏平板电脑两侧各有一个 USB-C 端口,以适应可折叠设计的各种模式和视角。
请记住,三个 USB-C 端口中只有两个与 Thunderbolt 4 设备兼容,但任何端口都可用于为设备充电或外接显示屏。
无线键盘也有一个 USB-C 端口,但只能用于充电。
交流
该机型标配英特尔 AX211,最高支持 Wi-Fi 6E,而 2021 机型仅限于 Wi-Fi 6。与华硕 AXE11000 测试路由器配对时,我们体验到了稳定的性能和可靠性。
WWAN SKU 包括一个用于支持 4G 的 nano-SIM 卡插槽。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
网络摄像头
该机型配备了 500 万像素网络摄像头,与 2021 版类似,支持红外 Windows Hello。但仍然没有网络摄像头快门,这对于如此昂贵的产品来说是一个奇怪的疏忽。
维护
与大多数平板电脑,尤其是折叠式平板电脑一样,ThinkPad X1 Fold 16 的设计不便于最终用户维修。内存无法升级,也不建议更换固态硬盘,否则有可能导致保修失效。
配件和保修
零售包装盒中包括联想Precision Pen 2、磁性蓝牙键盘和磁性后盖(可用作支架)。特别是键盘和支架对该机型的可用性至关重要,因此我们很高兴看到它们被列为标配,而不是可选配件。
如果在美国购买,将享受标准的一年有限保修服务。
输入设备--实际使用起来有点笨拙
键盘
背光键盘按键的布局和大小与 ThinkPad T14s 的键盘相似。 ThinkPad T14s.但按键反馈和键程感觉更轻,更接近 IdeaPad 键盘,而不是传统的 ThinkPad 键盘。因此,如果你习惯于在 ThinkPad 上打字,你可能会发现这里的按键比平时要柔软一些。
该键盘还可以通过 USB 接口在其他 PC 上使用,因此它并不局限于 ThinkPad X1 Fold。
触摸板
键盘比预期的要舒适,但点击板却恰恰相反。它的尺寸很小(11 x 5 厘米),与 4:3 的大屏幕搭配不协调,因此多点触控输入感觉非常拥挤。此外,点击时的反馈是海绵状的,而且非常轻,这让人感到不满意。很明显,联想希望你准备好鼠标,或者尽可能使用触摸屏,而不是小小的点击板。
展示--全场的明星
60 Hz 显示屏采用夏普 LJ163B1JX01 OLED 面板,目前在我们的数据库中还找不到其他笔记本电脑采用这种面板。这款高品质面板完全覆盖 DCI-P3,同时还具有 OLED 的通常优势,如完美的黑阶和快速的响应时间。不过,与其他大多数 OLED 面板不同的是,这里的面板没有玻璃层,因此不易损坏,在使用附带的手写笔时也更容易凹凸不平。
16.3 英寸的大尺寸和宽敞的 4:3 宽高比是可折叠触摸屏的亮点。不过,在刷新率方面,它与华硕 VivoBook Pro 等笔记本电脑相比还是有些差距。 华硕 VivoBook Pro 16等笔记本电脑已经配备了 120 Hz 的 OLED 屏幕。
ThinkPad Z1 Fold 16 支持 HDR600,在平板电脑模式下是一款出色的多媒体播放器。如果禁用 Windows HDR,那么普通的 SDR 内容将被限制在 400 尼特左右。
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 403.4 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.64
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.51
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 Sharp LJ163B1JX01, OLED, 2560x2024, 16.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE LEN4142, OLED, 2048x1536, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 BOE9C40, OLED, 2560x1920, 17.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U LP129WT2-SPA6, IPS, 2880x1920, 13" | HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Chi Mei CMN13C0, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 ATNA40YK15-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | 1% | -22% | -20% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 94.6 -5% | 99.9 0% | 65.6 -34% | 68.3 -32% | 99.9 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 97.7 -2% | 98.6 -1% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96 | 100 4% | 99.6 4% | 67.7 -29% | 70.2 -27% | 97 1% |
Response Times | -121% | -6% | 3116% | -5408% | -10% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.99 ? | 2.4 ? -142% | 1.12 ? -13% | 13 ? -1213% | 66.8 ? -6647% | 1.19 ? -20% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.04 ? | 2.8 ? -169% | 1.08 ? -4% | 19.4 ? -1765% | 44.4 ? -4169% | 1.68 ? -62% |
PWM Frequency | 240.6 ? | 119 -51% | 240 ? 0% | 29896 ? 12326% | 363 ? 51% | |
Screen | -67% | -15% | 25% | 11% | -24% | |
Brightness middle | 403.4 | 239 -41% | 333 -17% | 455 13% | 369.5 -8% | 427 6% |
Brightness | 423 | 235 -44% | 327 -23% | 453 7% | 350 -17% | 427 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 95 7% | 95 7% | 94 6% | 87 -2% | 98 10% |
Black Level * | 0.01 | 0.38 | 0.24 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.98 | 6.5 -118% | 3.2 -7% | 1.7 43% | 2.3 23% | 4.5 -51% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.27 | 10.3 -141% | 8.6 -101% | 3.8 11% | 4.34 -2% | 9.6 -125% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.64 | 3.4 -29% | 1.5 43% | 0.6 77% | 5 -89% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 6.5 -103% | 1.5 53% | 1.5 53% | 3.1 3% | 0.7 78% |
Gamma | 2.51 88% | 1.79 123% | 2.21 100% | 2.17 101% | 2.1 105% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6264 104% | 6221 104% | 6583 99% | 6761 96% | 6248 104% | 6470 100% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 91.9 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | |||||
Contrast | 33300 | 1197 | 1540 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -63% /
-64% | -7% /
-8% | 1040% /
728% | -1806% /
-900% | -11% /
-15% |
* ... smaller is better
尽管显示器支持 DCI-P3 色彩,但默认设置为 sRGB。它根据 sRGB 标准进行了适当的校准,平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别仅为 3.2 和 2.98。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.44 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.99 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5 ms rise | |
↘ 0.49 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.6 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
与 Zenbook 17 Fold 相似,在所有亮度级别上都会出现 240 Hz 的脉宽调制或闪烁。
在阴凉处的室外能见度尚可,但如果在较明亮的环境或阳光直射下,能见度就会大打折扣。400 尼特的显示屏比 iPad Pro 11 的显示屏暗约 30 iPad Pro 11.眩光几乎总是存在。
OLED 屏幕的视角一直很宽,但在 ThinkPad X1 Fold 上却经受住了考验。更具体地说,在笔记本电脑模式下,屏幕的下半部分会出现明显的亮度和色彩衰减,因为它相对于用户眼睛的角度要大得多。这种差异还不足以导致文本或网页无法阅读,但为了获得最准确的色彩,您需要将图像编辑器和视频等对色彩敏感的内容放在屏幕的上半部分。
性能:良好但不出色
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。联想商用优势电源配置文件与 Windows 同步,为最终用户简化了设置数量。
处理器
旧款 13 英寸机型的一大诟病是其超慢的 7 W 酷睿 i5-L16G7处理器。幸好联想听到了这些抱怨,并为 16 英寸机型配备了 9 瓦 U 系列 CPU。尽管如此 酷睿 i7-1250U已经落后了两代,与中端 Ryzen CPU(如 Ryzen 5 7530U.当然,它比酷睿 i5-L16G7 快了很多,但远远比不上大多数传统的 15 英寸或 16 英寸笔记本电脑,而且仍然落后于 微软 Surface Pro 9.
被动散热方式也会影响性能。例如,在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,我们的初始分数为 1085 分,但经过 2 到 3 次循环后,分数会降至 820 分,性能下降了 25%。这表明,ThinkPad X1 Fold 16 在短时间内的性能最佳,因为时间更长、要求更高的负载可能会开始扼杀 CPU。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U () | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U () | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U (5093 - 7187, n=3) | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U (3617 - 4347, n=3) | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U (2687 - 3755, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U (31653 - 36020, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
系统性能
与 13 英寸机型相比,PCMark 结果平均高出近 2.5 倍,代表着性能的显著提升。差距之大,足以让用户在浏览 Windows、启动应用程序或在浏览器标签之间切换时感受到速度上的差异。因此,整体用户体验更接近普通笔记本电脑,对于多任务处理者来说,比原来的 13 英寸机型更加流畅。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5168 - 5207, n=2) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10517 - 10742, n=2) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6685 - 7062, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5052 - 5330, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1338 - 1361, n=2) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1333 - 1345, n=2) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1400 - 1461, n=2) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1140 - 1180, n=2) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (265 - 267, n=2) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (228 - 229, n=2) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (577 - 587, n=2) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5168 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U (54484 - 61468, n=3) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1250U (89.3 - 145.7, n=3) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频时,LatencyMon 显示了 DPC 问题和 3 次丢帧。前者并无异常,但我们希望使用酷睿 i7 U 系列 CPU 的系统能做到零丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配有 512 GB 西部数据 SN740 SDDQMQDPCIe4 x4 NVMe SSD,连续读写速度分别接近 5000 MB/s 和 3200 MB/s。这块小型 M.2 2242 硬盘在使用 DiskSpd 进行几分钟的压力测试后,没有出现性能节流问题。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
图形处理性能再次提高 2 至 3 倍。 UHD Graphics旧款 13 英寸 ThinkPad Fold 的解决方案快 2 到 3 倍。不过,与采用相同集成式 Iris Xe 96 EUs 解决方案的笔记本电脑相比,它的性能有所下降。 相同的集成 Iris Xe 96 EUs 解决方案的笔记本电脑相比平均落后 15% 到 20%。落后的原因可能是无风扇设计和 CPU 性能普遍较慢。
如下表Fire Strike 所示,如果在平衡模式下运行,甚至使用电池供电,整体性能也不会明显下降。
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 4186 | 16399 | 1579 |
平衡模式 | 4195 | 16489 | 1582 |
电池供电 | 4139 | 16246 | 1572 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 5300 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14047 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3973 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1361 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
LG Gram 2in1 16 16T90R - G.AA78G | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (21.4 - 37.3, n=12) | |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 |
闲置时的性能 Witcher 3 在低设置下,开始时帧数稳定在 75 FPS,但几分钟后帧数就会下降,波动范围从 50 FPS 到 70 FPS 不等。出现这种不稳定的原因是 GPU 时钟速率的波动,详情请参见下面的压力测试部分。相比之下,大多数集成了 Iris Xe 图形处理器的笔记本电脑会在一段时间内表现出更稳定的性能数据。这种波动行为表明,ThinkPad X1 Fold 16 并不是为原生运行大多数游戏而设计的。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 71.4 | 66.4 | 19.2 | 8.01 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 75.3 | 47.7 | 25.8 | 11.6 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 89.8 | 69 | 55.3 | 41.3 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 33.2 | 18.5 | 15.7 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 40.7 | 32 | 28.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 27 | 18 | 16 | 15 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 70.2 | 31.5 | 24.1 | 19 |
F1 22 (2022) | 34.8 | 28 | 22 | 16.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 13.1 |
排放 - 无风扇!
系统噪音
与采用风扇散热的 Zenbook 17 Fold 相比,ThinkPad X1 Fold 16 的一个显著特点是无风扇设计、 Surface Pro 9我们的测试设备也没有发出任何电子噪音,给用户带来完全静音的使用体验。当运行要求更高的负载时,无风扇的优势就会发挥作用,因为上述华硕或微软机型的风扇都能达到 40 分贝(A)以上。
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1250U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDQMQD-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), i5-L16G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe | Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i7-1250U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV | HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1370P, WDC PC SN810 2TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | ||||||
off / environment * | 25.1 | 23.4 | 24.3 | 24.6 | 23.3 | |
Idle Minimum * | 25.1 | 24.3 | 24.3 | 24.6 | 23.3 | |
Idle Average * | 25.1 | 24.3 | 24.3 | 24.6 | 23.3 | |
Idle Maximum * | 25.1 | 24.3 | 24.3 | 24.6 | 23.3 | |
Load Average * | 25.1 | 27.9 | 37.9 | 27.8 | 35.9 | |
Load Maximum * | 26.8 | 43.4 | 41.8 | 33.4 | 40.9 | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.4 | 39.6 | 33.4 | 41 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在纵向模式下,由于主板的位置,上半部分的表面温度要比下半部分高得多。 Zenbook 17 折叠本.如下图所示,正面和背面的热点温度分别高达 43 摄氏度。也许并非巧合,在类似条件下,Zenbook 17 Fold 和 Surface Pro 9 也会达到类似的最高值。热点位于屏幕中央,因此在平板电脑模式下,边缘的温度绝不会让人感到不适。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE Intel Core i5-L16G7, Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) | Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 Intel Core i7-1250U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -7% | 0% | 1% | 16% | -11% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.6 | 45.1 -8% | 44.5 -7% | 44.6 -7% | 32.8 21% | 42.2 -1% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44.8 | 39.8 11% | 41.8 7% | 45.9 -2% | 33.4 25% | 43.8 2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.2 | 33 -21% | 28.9 -6% | 24.8 9% | 24.6 10% | 32 -18% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.4 | 29.2 -11% | 24.7 6% | 25.3 4% | 24.6 7% | 33.7 -28% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当在 Prime95 下运行时,CPU 会提升到 2.6 GHz 和 29 W,直到一到两分钟后核心温度达到 89 C。此后,CPU 会下降并最终稳定在 2 GHz 和 17 W,以保持 75 C 的较低核心温度。无风扇设计的 Turbo Boost 潜能有限是意料之中的,其结果也反映了上述 CineBench 的发现。
当运行 Witcher 3时,GPU 的频率为 650 至 950 MHz,这与上述循环帧速率相关。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 41 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.0 | -- | 75 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 0.8 - 1.0 | 500 - 750 | 62 - 65 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 0.8 | 650 - 950 | 61 |
发言人
该机型集成了三个 2 W 扬声器,而其他大多数笔记本电脑和平板电脑只有两个。虽然音质与尺寸相当,但我们希望扬声器的音量能再大一些。蜻蜓 Folio 13.5 的扬声器 Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 的扬声器的扬声器最高音量超过 88 dB(A),而联想的扬声器只有 82 dB(A)。
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 大尺寸 OLED 意味着大消耗量
耗电量
功耗与传统笔记本电脑基本一致。虽然无风扇设计节省了电能,但大尺寸、高要求的 OLED 触摸屏抵消了潜在的节电效果。例如,在最大亮度下空转明亮的白色屏幕(如网页或 Word 页面),ThinkPad X1 Fold 的耗电量为 22 W,而基于 IPS 技术的微软 Surface Pro 9 或惠普 Elite Dragonfly Folio 的耗电量仅为 11 W 或 10 W。 HP Elite Dragonfly Folio.
运行更高的负载,如 Witcher 3等更高负载时的耗电量与上述微软或惠普机型相当。不过,ThinkPad X1 Fold 16 的功耗最终会在 30 W 到 40 W 之间循环,就像上面提到的 GPU 时钟速率循环一样。
当 CPU 和 GPU 的利用率达到 100% 时,我们可以记录到 65 W USB-C 交流适配器(约 8.8 x 5 x 2.3 厘米)的临时最大功耗为 64 W。
Off / Standby | 0.34 / 0.66 Watt |
Idle | 5.2 / 6.7 / 22 Watt |
Load |
36.9 / 63.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 i7-1250U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDQMQD-512G, OLED, 2560x2024, 16.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE i5-L16G7, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, OLED, 2048x1536, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 i7-1250U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2560x1920, 17.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2880x1920, 13" | HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN810 2TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 24% | -9% | -4% | 18% | -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.2 | 7.2 -38% | 7.6 -46% | 5.1 2% | 3.4 35% | 7 -35% |
Idle Average * | 6.7 | 7.5 -12% | 12.3 -84% | 9.8 -46% | 4.9 27% | 7.9 -18% |
Idle Maximum * | 22 | 7.7 65% | 12.9 41% | 11.3 49% | 9.3 58% | 8.1 63% |
Load Average * | 36.9 | 20.5 44% | 35.2 5% | 47.5 -29% | 41.9 -14% | 40.5 -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.7 | 30.4 21% | 36 7% | 36.4 6% | 43 -11% | |
Load Maximum * | 63.3 | 24.8 61% | 56.6 11% | 68.5 -8% | 67.5 -7% | 66 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
与 2021 款 13 英寸机型不同,16 英寸机型的电池分为两部分(48 Wh + 16 Wh),以便在可折叠设计的上下两半之间更好地分配重量。合计 74 Wh 的电池容量比 13 英寸机型的电池容量大近 50%,与许多传统笔记本电脑的电池容量相当。
不过,在均衡电量模式下,实际网页浏览时间仅为 5.5 小时左右,与我们在旧款 13 英寸机型上记录的时间相比并不算长。因此,更大的电池容量被更大和要求更高的 OLED 屏幕所抵消。如果在笔记本电脑模式下只使用一半屏幕,当然可以获得更长的运行时间,但这意味着要放弃触摸屏的可折叠魅力。
从空电到满电大约需要 2 小时,这与大多数蛤壳式笔记本电脑类似。连接到插座上时,两个电池组可同时充电。
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16 i7-1250U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 64 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 20RL000FGE i5-L16G7, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), 50 Wh | Asus Zenbook 17 Fold UX9702 i7-1250U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 75 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.7 Wh | HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 87% | 104% | 21% | 99% | 10% | |
Reader / Idle | 730 | 1637 124% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 329 | 315 -4% | 403 22% | 451 37% | 565 72% | 389 18% |
Load | 79 | 219 177% | 226 186% | 82 4% | 158 100% | 80 1% |
H.264 | 357 | 662 | 562 |
Pros
Cons
评价:大幅改进,但仍存在人体工学问题
ThinkPad X1 Fold 16 与 2021 年推出的 13 英寸原版相比有了巨大的改进。 2021 13 英寸原版.从性能、制造质量到键盘,所有方面都得到了提升,与传统的 ThinkPad Clamshell 更为接近。在最佳状态下,ThinkPad X1 Fold 16 的屏幕面积更大,颜色更深,比 Surface Pro更多的屏幕空间和更深邃的色彩,而体积却没有 Surface Pro 大得多。
与可折叠设计相关的重大挑战依然存在,其中许多都是从最初的 2021 机型继承下来的。首先,该设备比看上去要重,尤其是与磁性无线键盘和脚架结合使用时。其次,与 Surface Pro 的全平面玻璃屏幕相比,OLED 屏幕的滑动特性更加粘滞和颠簸。 Surface Pro或大多数平板电脑的全平面玻璃屏幕相比,OLED 屏幕的滑动特性更粘滞、更颠簸。如果你喜欢画素描或做大量笔记,可折叠屏幕不均匀的表面会让你感到不爽。第三,单独的键盘和脚架携带不便。在笔记本电脑模式下,必须先取下键盘才能合上屏幕,这与普通的蛤壳式或可折叠式笔记本电脑相比,更是雪上加霜。我们也不建议旅行时不带这两个配件,因为这两个配件对于最大限度地提高 X1 Fold 的可用性至关重要。
巨大的可折叠 OLED 屏幕无疑在使用之初非常有趣,但独立的键盘和脚架以及不合格的 Windows 支持阻碍了工作效率。
电池续航时间和 Windows 对可折叠显示屏的有限支持等其他方面也没有得到改善。性能虽然比以前好了很多,但相对于高昂的售价来说,仍然是一般。
很明显,4000 美元的售价是为了获得可折叠 OLED 触摸屏的新鲜感。大型可折叠显示屏在长途飞行等狭小空间内播放多媒体时非常有用,但其工作效率严重依赖于笨重的部件,无法与普通笔记本电脑或可折叠电脑的人体工学设计相媲美。更传统的系统,如 Surface Pro 9或 ThinkPad X1 Carbon在大多数情况下,它们通常更轻、更快、更舒适,即使使用起来可能会 "无聊"。
价格和供应情况
联想已开始发售配备支持 vPro 的酷睿 i7-1260U 的 ThinkPad X2 Fold 16,售价 3900 美元。
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Fold 16
- 02/14/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.