Minisforum MGA1 评测:将迷你 PC、掌上电脑和笔记本电脑变为游戏机的外置显卡
不仅仅是电子图形处理器
小巧的外置 GPU 能否真正实现桌面性能?基于 AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT,Minisforum 承诺其 MGA1 可以做到这一点。请阅读我们的评测,了解这款外置图形处理器的性能,以及您是否应该购买它。Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论 - 实现更多 3D 性能的简单解决方案
Minisforum MGA1 eGPU 是一种简单而有趣的解决方案,适用于希望扩展其微型 PC 或手持设备图形性能的用户。该 eGPU 配备 AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT 和 8 GB GDDR6 内存,可在游戏和视频编辑等图形密集型应用中提供稳定的性能。通过 HDMI 2.1 和 DisplayPort 2.0 支持多达三台 8K 显示器,为用户提供了广泛的应用可能性。此外,eGPU 还扩展了 USB 端口的数量,其 USB-C 端口允许通过 Minisforum MGA1 直接连接和操作功率高达 65 瓦的设备。
总的来说,这一切听起来都很不错,而且事实证明,该 eGPU 在实际使用中也完美无缺。不过,与其他 eGPU 解决方案相比,Minisforum 型号只能通过 OCuLink 连接,这一点令人遗憾。这大大限制了它的潜在用途,因为只有少数设备配备了这种连接。从技术角度看,OCuLink 比 USB4 连接更具优势,这也是制造商做出这一决定的理由。不过,通过 USB4 连接的替代选择也很有用,因为这将大大增加产品的目标市场。Minisforum MGA1 目前的售价为 559 美元,比竞争对手便宜很多。
总的来说,Minisforum MGA1 的外观质量很高,这与制造商选择的材料有关。小巧的设计中蕴藏着不俗的性能,而且还可以将 eGPU 与各种设备结合使用,这无疑都是它的优点。任何拥有兼容迷你 PC 或手持设备的用户都可以明显提高 3D 性能,而无需购买全新的系统。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Minisforum MGA1 可直接从制造商处购买,价格为 559 美元。.
MGA1 是 Minisforum 推出的外置 GPU 扩展坞,专为迷你 PC 和手持设备开发。配备 8GB GDDR6 内存的 AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT 图形处理器可提升 3D 应用程序的性能。该 eGPU 还提供额外的连接选项,这对于外部接口较少的设备尤为有用。Minisforum 的 MGA1 eGPU 可以通过 OCuLink 连接,这是一个不错的选择,因为它允许 eGPU 以全带宽(PCIe 4.0 x4)运行。
Minisforum MGA1 的价格为 559 美元,对于那些希望提高系统图形性能而又不想使用笨重的台式机解决方案的用户来说,这款 eGPU 是一个强大的解决方案。它的紧凑性和功能性使其对 Minisforum AtomMan 或 EliteMini 系列等迷你 PC 的用户尤其具有吸引力。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
外壳 - 坚固的金属外壳
该技术的外壳非常不起眼,主要由金属制成。通风口是其外观的一大特色,目的是确保操作顺畅。然而,要做到完全不使用塑料也是不可能的。Minisforum 放弃了在设备两侧使用金属。不过,外置显卡给人留下了非常优质的触觉印象。
连接性 - 作为扩展坞的 eGPU
当看到它的外部接口时,很快就会明白这不仅仅是一个简单的 eGPU,因为除了三个显示器接口外,它还配备了三个 USB-A 接口。eGPU 可以通过 OCuLink 连接,但遗憾的是,这是唯一的选择。这是一个遗憾,因为它大大限制了 eGPU 的使用。其他型号,如 GPD G1还可以通过 USB4 连接。与 OCuLink 相比,USB4 的带宽较低,因此性能会降低约 10%。使用 USB-A 端口时需要注意:如果要使用这些端口,除了 OCuLink 连接外,还必须通过 USB-C 连接 Minisforum MGA1。
配件
交付的产品不多。除了 eGPU 本身,制造商还提供了一条电源线和一条 OCuLink 线缆。
维护
与笔记本电脑或微型 PC 不同,eGPU 无法进一步升级。因此,维护工作只包括清洁设备。值得庆幸的是,它坚固的金属外壳很容易打开。只需拧下四颗螺丝,就能取下顶部。下面的风扇也很容易拆卸,这使得清洁工作变得更加容易。
性能 - Minisforum MGA1 可大幅提高微型 PC 的运行速度
作为一款可靠的中端显卡,AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT 完全适合全高清游戏。Minisforum MGA1 还配备了 8 GB VRAM,足以满足大多数应用的需要。
测试条件
我们使用了 Minisforum MS-A1-作为本次测试的基础。此外,AMD Ryzen 7 8700G 还为涵盖所有最重要的应用场景提供了坚实的基础。
合成基准 - MGA1 和 G1 的视线高度
对于第一项性能比较,让我们先看看合成基准测试的结果。总的来说,我们注意到 Minisforum MGA1 和 GPD G1 eGPU 的结果几乎完全相同。而 Minisforum G7 PT也采用了类似的硬件,但由于其 CPU 性能更强,因此性能略高。它与 AMD Radeon RX 7600的相似之处在这里清晰可见,因为这款便携式 GPU 相比之下只降低了 10%。由于功率高达 165 瓦,显卡的回旋余地更大一些。
为了说明性能的提升,我们不妨看看 Minisforum MS-A1,它只需应对 AMD Radeon 780M不带 eGPU。这款 Minisforum EliteMini AI370尽管拥有强大的 AMD Radeon 890M.因此,只要满足要求,使用外置显卡还是值得的。目前,使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑,它安装在 Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti或 华硕 ROG NUC等等。不过,eGPU 的优势在于其灵活性,可以与不同的设备配合使用。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 |
Unigine Superposition | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Acemagic M2A | |
XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Acemagic M2A | |
XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
1280x720 720p Low | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Acemagic M2A | |
XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Acemagic M2A | |
XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 | |
1280x720 Performance | |
XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 |
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 |
专业应用
与有关渲染性能的基准测试相比,AMD 的表现非常出色。Minisforum MGA1 在这方面取得了相当不错的成绩,甚至比 GPD G1 略胜一筹。不过 图形处理器 G1的性能不足以在专业应用中使用 eGPU。遗憾的是,消费级显卡跟不上专业图形解决方案的步伐。
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT | Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT | XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition R9 7950X, AMD Radeon RX 7600 | Minisforum MS-A1 Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Radeon 780M | Minisforum EliteMini AI370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Minisforum G7 PT R9 7945HX, AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT | KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X R9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | Dell Precision 5690 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Average of class | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 2020 | -4% | 12% | -66% | -56% | -12% | -3% | -21% | 21% | -9% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 32.1 | 30.6 -5% | 36.1 12% | 12.9 -60% | 17.5 -45% | 15.2 -53% | 30.8 -4% | 13.7 -57% | 58.46 82% | 20 ? -38% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 163 | 160 -2% | 178 9% | 45.3 -72% | 62.9 -61% | 223 37% | 171 5% | 196 20% | 184.05 13% | 202 ? 24% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 58.9 | 55.6 -6% | 67 14% | 21.4 -64% | 28.3 -52% | 44 -25% | 43.2 -27% | 33.2 -44% | 38.09 -35% | 48.7 ? -17% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 95.3 | 93.7 -2% | 106 11% | 30.6 -68% | 37.6 -61% | 93.7 -2% | 97.5 2% | 85.9 -10% | 100.9 6% | 75.3 ? -21% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 64.5 | 63.3 -2% | 68 5% | 24.2 -62% | 27.3 -58% | 37.3 -42% | 64.1 -1% | 34 -47% | 67.17 4% | 45.8 ? -29% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 61.1 | 55.9 -9% | 72.9 19% | 19.9 -67% | 26.8 -56% | 69 13% | 63.9 5% | 67.4 10% | 94.56 55% | 77.6 ? 27% |
游戏性能--足够快,可进行全高清游戏
在纯游戏性能方面,Minisforum MGA1 的表现令人信服。与简单的 iGPU 相比,它在所有 3D 应用程序中的差异都很明显。在技术上,我们与 Minisforum MS-A1 的组合没有任何问题。与 GPD G1相比,Minisforum 的 eGPU 的性能提高了 10 个百分点。两款产品的基础相似,主要区别在于冷却装置,Minisforum 解决得更好一些。
实际上,你可以在 1080p 下流畅地运行许多游戏。不过,如果想玩最新的游戏,偶尔也需要降低细节级别。Minisforum MGA1 还可以使用 FSR 等功能来提高帧频。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M |
GTA V | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Acemagic M2A | |
HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (68.4 - 80.2, n=8) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (32.5 - 68.6, n=51) | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (157.8 - 174.3, n=8) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (91.6 - 169.4, n=50) |
Dota 2 Reborn | |
1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (31.6 - 98.8, n=58) | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (34.8 - 100, n=8) | |
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (132.3 - 175.6, n=8) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (34.7 - 164.8, n=58) |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (25.4 - 32.3, n=8) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (13.8 - 29.6, n=37) | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (40 - 52.5, n=8) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (32.5 - 52.1, n=40) |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (24.1 - 31.2, n=8) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (13.8 - 29.9, n=26) | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Acemagic M2A | |
HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (58.9 - 73.4, n=3) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (30.7 - 67.4, n=16) |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (53.4 - 66, n=2) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (23.3 - 59.5, n=14) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 | |
HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (87.2 - 104.6, n=2) | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (43.3 - 94.8, n=14) |
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (11 - 19, n=3) | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 | |
Acemagic M2A | |
Minisforum G7 PT | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (15 - 25, n=3) |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD FSR | QHD | 4K FSR | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 184.7 | 181 | 172.6 | 97.2 | 70.2 | 74.9 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 452 | 343 | 194.7 | 113.6 | 78.7 | 54.8 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 185.3 | 159.3 | 134.6 | 120.8 | 88.9 | |||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 229 | 134.9 | 93.6 | 67.6 | 36.3 | |||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 111.4 | 92.3 | 73.2 | 53.4 | ||||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 153 | 137 | 132 | 124 | 103 | 52 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 495 | 259 | 212 | 179.5 | 119.6 | 63.7 | ||
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 341.8 | 195.5 | 124.6 | 85.2 | 51 | 23.9 | ||
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 148.9 | 132.1 | 122.6 | 102.5 | 70.2 | 3.02 | ||
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 236 | 187 | 179 | 76 | 58 | 36 | ||
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) | 246 | 208 | 177.3 | 161 | 129.4 | 79.8 | ||
God of War (2022) | 126.4 | 122.3 | 99.2 | 69.3 | 53.5 | 33.9 | ||
Starfield (2023) | 77.5 | 75.9 | 63.1 | 57.2 | 46.8 | 30.7 | ||
Lies of P (2023) | 176.1 | 150.4 | 128.5 | 113.8 | 76.3 | 37.8 | ||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 134.2 | 104.7 | 89.3 | 87.7 | 60.6 | 30.3 | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 121.7 | 96.8 | 81.8 | 73.2 | 45.8 | 19.8 | ||
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 130 | 118 | 108 | 76 | 56 | 33 | ||
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 326.8 | 218.9 | 135.7 | 109.9 | 75.3 | 35.4 | ||
Lords of the Fallen (2023) | 89.1 | 81 | 66.4 | 49.4 | 32.7 | 16.9 | ||
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 59 | 54 | 38 | 28 | 19 | 9 | ||
F1 24 (2024) | 281 | 257 | 190.8 | 33.9 | 10.9 | |||
The First Descendant (2024) | 154.6 | 99.4 | 87.9 | 72.9 | 43.9 | 15.7 | 22.2 | |
Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 79 | 58 | 44 | 23 | 16 | |||
Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 43.5 | 38.8 | 35 | 28.2 | 19.5 | |||
Space Marine 2 (2024) | 67.8 | 67.2 | 65.6 | 63.3 | 45.2 | |||
Final Fantasy XVI (2024) | 62.1 | 59.9 | 53.3 | 54.4 | 13.2 | 48.7 | 10.3 | 23 |
God of War Ragnarök (2024) | 120.1 | 105.5 | 90.8 | 52.1 | 5.8 | |||
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 143 | 129 | 82 | 77 | 64 | 60 | 35 | 35 |
排放 - 优于竞争对手
噪音排放
Minisforum MGA1 的冷却概念类似于 GPD G1的 eGPU 要安静得多。新鲜空气从顶部吸入,然后从两侧和背面排出机箱。空转时,我们记录到迷你 PC 和 eGPU 组合的噪音略低于 31 分贝(A),明显低于 GPD 的竞争产品。在平均负载下,eGPU 的噪音为 40 dB(A),我们测得的峰值声压级高达 48.8 dB(A)。即便如此,在负载情况下,与游戏微型 PC 的对比结果也相差无几。尽管如此,GPD G1 eGPU 的声音确实很大,我们在游戏时测得的约 59 dB(A) 的声压级绝对需要使用耳机。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 30.7 / 30.8 / 30.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 39.8 / 48.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A) |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon RX 7600M XT | Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon RX 7600M XT | Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Minisforum G7 PT R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7600M XT | Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Acemagic M2A i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -14% | -9% | 3% | 13% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 24.7 | 24.7 -0% | 24.7 -0% | 24.4 1% | 24.9 -1% | 24.3 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.7 | 35.9 -17% | 34 -11% | 29.3 5% | 24.9 19% | 32.7 -7% |
Idle Average * | 30.8 | 36.3 -18% | 34.1 -11% | 29.4 5% | 24.9 19% | 32.8 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.8 | 36.3 -18% | 34.1 -11% | 29.4 5% | 24.9 19% | 33.1 -7% |
Load Average * | 39.8 | 41.6 -5% | 48.6 -22% | 43.5 -9% | 37.9 5% | 40.7 -2% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 49.6 | 58.6 -18% | 55.2 -11% | 45.5 8% | 38.3 23% | 45.8 8% |
Load Maximum * | 48.8 | 58.6 -20% | 48.3 1% | 45 8% | 44.2 9% | 53.9 -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.3 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在负载情况下,金属机箱会变得很热,并能很好地将废热分布到整个表面。底部的发热量略高于顶部。不过,我们没有发现任何关键热点。在压力测试中,图形芯片本身的温度达到了 75 °C,与 GPD G1 相比并无明显改善。在 120 瓦的持续负载下,AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT 可以在较长时间内毫无问题地发挥全部性能。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24.3 to 57 °C for the class .
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 37.3 °C / 99 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the class .
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (-9.9 °C / -17.8 F).
电源管理--RX 7600M XT 并非耗能大户
迷你论坛允许 AMD Radeon RX 7600M XTAMD 允许的最大功耗,即 120 瓦。制造商提供的 VBIOS 选项不会对功耗产生影响。在空闲模式下 微型论坛 MS-A1和 Minisforum MGA1 仅需 20 多瓦。在平均负载情况下,能耗需求攀升至 102 瓦左右,但在峰值负载情况下,能耗需求可高达 241 瓦。这里的功耗不仅指 eGPU 本身,还包括微型电脑本身。
eGPU 的电源由一个内部安装的电源装置组成。它可提供高达 240 瓦的功率,还可通过 USB-C 端口使用 Power Delivery 功能连接和操作功率高达 65 瓦的设备。
Off / Standby | 1.75 / 2.1 Watt |
Idle | 21.2 / 21.9 / 22.7 Watt |
Load |
102.2 / 241 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon RX 7600M XT | Minisforum MS-A1 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon RX 7600M XT | Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Minisforum G7 PT R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7600M XT | Asus ROG NUC 14-90AS0051 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Acemagic M2A i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Average AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT | Average of class | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -5% | -24% | -34% | 16% | -18% | -8% | 56% | |
Idle Minimum * | 21.2 | 21.4 -1% | 21 1% | 23 -8% | 10.6 50% | 26.4 -25% | 20.4 ? 4% | 7.76 ? 63% |
Idle Average * | 21.9 | 22.3 -2% | 35.1 -60% | 28.1 -28% | 14.8 32% | 30.4 -39% | 23.1 ? -5% | 11.1 ? 49% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.7 | 24.2 -7% | 39.6 -74% | 40.4 -78% | 27.5 -21% | 33.5 -48% | 27.7 ? -22% | 13.7 ? 40% |
Load Average * | 102.2 | 105.3 -3% | 106.9 -5% | 131.2 -28% | 84.6 17% | 112.6 -10% | 112.6 ? -10% | 45.5 ? 55% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 206 | 222 -8% | 217 -5% | 282 -37% | 171.4 17% | 194.7 5% | ||
Load Maximum * | 241 | 260 -8% | 249 -3% | 296 -23% | 244 -1% | 215 11% | 259 ? -7% | 70 ? 71% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption with external monitor
Power consumption with external monitor
Notebookcheck 总评分
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.