
OnePlus 13R 评测--续航能力惊人、差异惊人的智能手机
还能接受多少节流?
在 OnePlus 13R 上,现实和一厢情愿有时会有些背离。虽然制造商宣传其顶级手机具有 "顶级性能",但在我们的测试中却无法证实这一点。尽管如此,OnePlus 13 的小兄弟还是提供了许多值得购买的积极方面。Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
对 OnePlus 13R 的评价
OnePlus 13R 拥有高品质的外观和令人印象深刻的续航能力。它结合了去年的旗舰 SoC、出色的扬声器和漂亮的 LTPO 面板,使 OnePlus 智能手机成为完美的日常伴侣。
然而,这家中国制造商的 R 机型缺少一些高端功能,而这些功能已逐渐成为当今高端智能手机的标准配置。例如,它的 USB 2.0 端口并不能提供该价位手机的最高性能,也不支持无线充电或 eSIM 集成。当许多竞争对手都提供防水保护壳时,OnePlus 13R 的 IP65 等级对于一些潜在买家来说可能是一个决定性的不利因素。
OnePlus 13R 的一大弱点是余热过高,这导致处理器在这款顶级手机中的运行速度明显下降。在峰值时性能降低近三分之二,不仅对我们的整体评分产生了负面影响,而且在日常高强度使用(如长时间游戏或图形要求较高的任务)时也会导致性能波动。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
OnePlus 13R 售价 599.99 美元,可直接从制造商的在线商店订购。.
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OnePlus 13R Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $8.99 HOMEMO 2 Pack For OnePlus 13... 2. $7.55 Suttkue for OnePlus 13R Scre... 3. $6.59 Natbok 2+2 Pack for OnePlus ... List Price: 749€ | 206 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" 2780x1264 450 PPI AMOLED | |
OnePlus 12R 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB | List Price: 499 EUR | 207 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2780x1264 450 PPI AMOLED | |
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $9.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi 14T Pro S... 2. $5.98 Aiziki (2 Pack) Designed for... 3. $6.59 Anoowkoa 3 Pack Compatible w... | 195 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED | |
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $12.97 YOUULAR [2 Pack Privacy Scre... 2. $13.46 for Honor 200 Pro Screen Pro... 3. $9.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... List Price: 800€ | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" 2700x1224 437 PPI OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: 1. $7.99 Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design... 2. $5.99 Milomdoi 3 Pack Screen Prote... 3. $6.89 amFilm Auto-Alignment OneTou... | 213 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI AMOLED | |
OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $12.98 2+2 Pcs Screen Protector One... 2. $9.98 JZG 3pcs for OnePlus 13 Scre... 3. $339.99 OnePlus 10 Pro | 5G Android ... List Price: 720€ | 213 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.82" 3168x1440 510 PPI AMOLED |
Table of Contents
- 对 OnePlus 13R 的评价
- OnePlus 13R 的规格
- 手机壳 - IP 等级的 OnePlus 手机
- 连接性 - OnePlus 手机仅配备 USB 2.0
- 软件 - 配有Android 15 的 OnePlus 13R
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - OnePlus 智能手机支持双 GPS
- 电话功能和通话质量 - 不支持 eSIM 卡的 OnePlus 手机
- 摄像头 - 配备 OIS 的 OnePlus 13R
- 配件和保修 - OnePlus 手机不含电源供应器
- 输入设备和操作 - 配备 FaceUnlock 的 OnePlus 手机
- 显示屏 - OnePlus 13R 采用 LTPO 面板
- 性能 - OnePlus 智能手机配备高通 SoC 芯片
- 游戏 - OnePlus 13R 实现了 120fps 的速度
- 排放 - OnePlus 手机被节流
- 电池续航时间 - OnePlus 13R 充电速度非常快
- Notebookcheck 总评分
OnePlus 13R 采用了与中国制造商旗舰产品 OnePlus 13R 相似的概念。 一加 13.价格更实惠的 13R 机型旨在以其人工智能、高性能和特别大的 6000 毫安时电池给人留下深刻印象。OnePlus 13R 安装的 OLED 显示屏与更昂贵的旗舰机型几乎相同,因为它采用了一块 6.78 英寸、120 Hz LTPO AMOLED 面板,HDR 峰值亮度为 4,500 尼特。
这款顶级 OnePlus 手机以王牌 5 的名义在中国发布,目前只在美国推出了配备 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 内部存储空间的版本。在本次评测中,我们将揭晓 OnePlus 13 还有哪些不同之处。
OnePlus 13R 的规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
手机壳 - IP 等级的 OnePlus 手机
OnePlus 13R 的外壳质量上乘,做工精美。不过,鉴于其棱角分明的设计,它的握持感可能会更符合人体工程学。这款高档手机有两种颜色可供选择,一种是黑色,背面为磨砂玻璃;另一种是灰色,表面略带纹理。两种颜色都不会留下指纹。
一个小缺点是大猩猩 7i 玻璃保护着它的 6.78 英寸显示屏。与大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 等最新一代产品相比,这种由硅酸铝锂制成的中档玻璃材料在抗摔性方面有些落后。与 OnePlus 13 相比,通过 IP65 认证的外壳缺乏防尘和防水功能是另一个缺点。 一加 13.
即便如此,其 6.78 英寸 OLED 面板周围的边框还是非常窄,给 R 机型带来了非常现代的外观。因此,屏幕与机身正面的尺寸比例达到了 91.2%。OnePlus 13R 还具有 OnePlus 智能手机特有的警报滑动按钮,可用于通知静音。
连接性 - OnePlus 手机仅配备 USB 2.0
相比之下 旗舰相比,R 机型只有一个 USB 2.0 端口。在使用连接的 M2 SSD 硬盘(三星 980 Pro)进行复制测试时,我们测得的传输速度仅为 40 MB/s。连接的存储介质可格式化为 NTFS 或 exFAT。不支持通过端口进行有线图像输出。
除此之外,这款 OnePlus 高端手机还配备了现代蓝牙 5.4、红外爆破器、Miracast 和用于非接触式支付的 NFC 功能。
软件 - 配有Android 15 的 OnePlus 13R
OnePlus 13R 搭载了该公司自己的 OxygenOS,它基于最新的Android 15。在测试时,安全补丁相当及时,即从 2025 年 1 月开始。根据 OnePlus 的说法,与安全相关的更新将持续 6 年,但 R 机型将提前两年(即 2029 年)收到最后一次 "重要 "Android 更新。这没有问题,但三星或 谷歌在这方面做得还是更持久一些。
除了 Circle to Search 和谷歌的 Gemini 之外,OnePlus 还在其 Oxygen 界面中加入了更多人工智能功能。其中包括 AI 笔记、自带人工智能的智能设备搜索(名为 OnePlus AI)以及基于 AI 的照片和视频编辑。
可持续性
OnePlus 没有提供任何有关所用材料或其回收率的准确信息。13R 的包装似乎不使用塑料,但设备本身在运输过程中使用了一层薄膜保护--可能由可堆肥的生物塑料制成。包装的其余部分由纸板制成。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - OnePlus 智能手机支持双 GPS
OnePlus 13R 不仅支持现代 "be "标准 WiFi 7,还支持快速的 6 GHz 频段。不过,在我们的测试中,这款高端手机在与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 的配合中表现出了一些弱点。它在 6 GHz WLAN 中的接收数据速度并不快,而且我们使用高通公司的 FastConnect 7800 调制解调器测量的发送数据速率也不太稳定。
OnePlus 13R 最多只能通过 5G 标准访问移动数据网络,并支持多种频率。它在 4G 网络中的频段支持也非常好,与本次测试地德国相关的所有频率都可用。此外,这款高端手机还拥有 25 个 LTE 频段,可在德国以外的地区使用。
Networking | |
OnePlus 13R | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
OnePlus 13 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average Wi-Fi 7 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
电话功能和通话质量 - 不支持 eSIM 卡的 OnePlus 手机
摄像头 - 配备 OIS 的 OnePlus 13R
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide-angleWide-angleLow lightZoom 5xUltra-wide angle在受控照明条件下,我们将索尼主镜头的色彩表现与实际参考色彩进行了对比分析。在描述 ColorChecker Passport 时,50-MPix 镜头显示绿色色调变亮和轻微过饱和。不过,OnePlus 13R 在色彩保真度方面没有表现出任何异常(>10)。总的来说,这款高端手机的校准效果对于智能手机来说非常好。


配件和保修 - OnePlus 手机不含电源供应器
输入设备和操作 - 配备 FaceUnlock 的 OnePlus 手机
OnePlus 13R 的显示屏上集成了光学指纹传感器,虽然工作可靠,但其质量无法与它的超声波传感器相提并论。 大哥.此外,它的位置太靠屏幕底部,不符合我们的口味。您还可以使用可靠性稍差的 2D 面部识别功能,该功能基于使用前置摄像头的 FaceUnlock(面部解锁)功能。不过,在光线不足的情况下,这个功能并不总能可靠地工作。
除此之外,OnePlus 13R 配有 6.78 英寸 120 Hz OLED 面板,在日常使用中反应灵敏,操作流畅。输入时,线性振动电机(X 轴)可提供清晰的反馈。在日常使用中,特别是在寒冷的季节,它的另一个优势是支持厚度达 5 毫米的天然纤维手套输入。在我们的测试中,较厚的聚酯手套也能正常使用。
显示屏 - OnePlus 13R 采用 LTPO 面板
这款手机的 AMOLED 显示屏分辨率为 1264p,像素密度高达 450 PPI,采用 LTPO 技术,可在 1 Hz 和 120 Hz 之间动态调节刷新率。PWM 调制用于控制屏幕亮度,而屏幕亮度通常会通过屏幕闪烁来显示。值得庆幸的是,我们用示波器测得的频率高达 2,000 Hz 左右,这意味着视觉上可感知的亮度波动应该不会影响眼睛--即使是敏感的用户。
根据其数据表,OnePlus 13R 的面板峰值亮度为 4,500 尼特,但我们在测试过程中的任何测量都没有达到这一数值。虽然我们在使用 APL18 模式时能够达到 1,262 cd/m² 的亮度,但在播放 4K 视频材料时,亮度却下降到了 1,086 cd/m²。这意味着 HDR 内容是可以察觉到的,但如果使用小米 14T Pro,效果会更好。 小米 14T Pro(4,407 cd/m²)的效果要好得多。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1213 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
OnePlus 13R AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8" | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Xiaomi 14T AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Honor 200 Pro OLED, 2700x1224, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | OnePlus 13 AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -2% | 7% | 11% | -9% | 2% | |
Brightness middle | 1213 | 1034 -15% | 1012 -17% | 1208 0% | 1211 0% | 1155 -5% |
Brightness | 1206 | 1035 -14% | 1016 -16% | 1194 -1% | 1214 1% | 1155 -4% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 96 -1% | 95 -2% | 98 1% | 99 2% | 98 1% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.1 -10% | 0.7 30% | 0.9 10% | 1.6 -60% | 1 -0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.3 | 1.9 17% | 1.8 22% | 1.4 39% | 2.4 -4% | 1.8 22% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.4 12% | 1.2 25% | 1.3 19% | 1.5 6% | 1.6 -0% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.19 100% | 2.29 96% | 2.13 103% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6546 99% | 6674 97% | 6489 100% | 6413 101% | 6456 101% | 6503 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 90 Hz Amplitude: 14.15 % Secondary Frequency: 2000 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8584 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.659 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6405 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
3.62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.706 ms rise | |
↘ 1.913 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms). |
这款顶级手机在户外表现非常出色。即使在阳光充足、玻璃表面反光的情况下,内容依然清晰易读。不过,OLED 显示屏的亮度储备有限,"只有 "1,250 cd/m²,而竞争对手往往亮度极高。 亮度相比,OLED 显示屏的亮度储备 "仅 "为 1,250 cd/m²。值得注意的是,在未激活环境光传感器的情况下,其最大亮度仅为 816 cd/m²。
OnePlus 13R 的可视角度长时间保持稳定,只有从非常平的角度观看时面板才会明显变暗。
性能 - OnePlus 智能手机配备高通 SoC 芯片
虽然 骁龙 8 代 3已不再是高通公司 旗舰 SoC但去年的芯片组仍然非常强大。在 Geekbench CPU 基准测试中,这款配备 12GB DDR5X 内存的顶级手机表现非常出色。不过,它在 PCMark 和 CrossMark 系统测试中的数值却相当低。即使是 骁龙 8s Gen 3在 Honor 200 Pro也比 OnePlus 13R 做得更好。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
OnePlus 13 | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (11487 - 18370, n=17) | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
Geekbench AI | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=29, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 13 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (483 - 1126, n=5) | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=29, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 13 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (219 - 492, n=5) | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
OnePlus 13 | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 1501, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (235 - 491, n=5) | |
OnePlus 13R |
AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (5170 - 7987, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (68.9 - 10957, n=33, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
安装的 Adreno 750是一款功能强大的 GPU,它没有理由躲避高端竞争产品--恰恰相反。在 GFXBench 测试中,我们注意到 OnePlus 13R 和三星 S24 FEi 之间的差距约为 30%。 三星Galaxy S24 FE的 Xclipse 940.不过,13R 的屏幕数值限制在 60fps 令人惊讶。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Honor 200 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Honor 200 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi 14T |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi 14T |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Xiaomi 14T |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Honor 200 Pro |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
OnePlus 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Xiaomi 14T |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
OnePlus 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Honor 200 Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi 14T |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi 14T |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Honor 200 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Honor 200 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus 13 | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Honor 200 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Honor 200 Pro |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Honor 200 Pro |
在日常使用中,OnePlus 13R 浏览器的速度完全没有问题;在 OnePlus 13R 上打开网站的速度很快,滚动浏览也很流畅。相比之下,OnePlus 手机在浏览器基准测试中的成绩相当弱,无论我们使用的是谷歌 Chrome 浏览器还是微软 Edge 浏览器。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (64.1 - 241, n=21) | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=170, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133) | |
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73) | |
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4.3 - 17.2, n=12) | |
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133) | |
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73) | |
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=17) | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64) | |
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73) | |
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 72665, n=21) | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64) | |
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=208, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73) | |
Honor 200 Pro |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64) | |
OnePlus 13R (Edge 133) | |
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (546 - 2066, n=19) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130) | |
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131) |
* ... smaller is better
OnePlus 13R 在存储连接方面拥有很高的价值。这款采用 UFS 4.0 标准的高端手机在我们的测试中提供了非常出色的读写速度,尤其是在处理小数据块时。
OnePlus 13R | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | Xiaomi 14T | Honor 200 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | OnePlus 13 | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -2% | -2% | -42% | -57% | -10% | -11% | -42% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 3987.44 | 3824.7 -4% | 3605.16 -10% | 1992.32 -50% | 1783.43 -55% | 3984.23 0% | 3657 ? -8% | 1973 ? -51% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 3201.32 | 3642.57 14% | 3294.31 3% | 1644.98 -49% | 631.23 -80% | 3684.36 15% | 2633 ? -18% | 1580 ? -51% |
Random Read 4KB | 374.54 | 355.7 -5% | 403.97 8% | 276.23 -26% | 312.98 -16% | 301.29 -20% | 392 ? 5% | 280 ? -25% |
Random Write 4KB | 542.13 | 467.74 -14% | 493.57 -9% | 321.09 -41% | 127.53 -76% | 344.63 -36% | 412 ? -24% | 320 ? -41% |
游戏 - OnePlus 13R 实现了 120fps 的速度
在 GFXBench 屏幕测试中,OnePlus 手机未能达到 60 帧/秒大关,我们认为它不会给我们带来真正的游戏惊喜。然而,我们记录到的帧率却让我们大吃一惊。使用GameBench 应用程序来看看 120 Hz 面板每秒能显示多少帧。
根据制造商的说法,R 机型使用内部 CPU 调度器来提高 骁龙 8 代 3在游戏过程中的效率。因此,它在运行《源氏冲击》时的功耗降低了 3%,这反过来又减少了发热量,还能确保更稳定的帧率。在高细节的情况下,我们最初测得这款奇幻动作角色扮演游戏的平均帧数为 58fps(目前在Android 上还无法达到每秒 60 帧以上)。但大约 10 分钟后,由于散热过高,帧速率明显下降,低于 50fps 的临界值。在 20 分钟的测量过程中,OnePlus 13R 稳定在 44 到 47fps 左右。
在运行《PUBG Mobile》时,我们可以在低图形设置下使用面板的 120 Hz 刷新率。然而,在中等细节(高清模式)下,OnePlus 13R 只能达到典型的 60 帧/秒,而当我们在测试过程中提高图形细节(UHD)时,Adreno 图形单元则能稳定地达到 40 帧/秒。
排放 - OnePlus 手机被节流
温度
OnePlus 13R 的散热效率很低,导致日常使用时机壳背面的表面温度很高。在 3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试中,高发热量导致其系统性能下降高达 65%。由于 骁龙 8 代 3的极端节流,在日常使用中很可能会出现负载下性能下降的情况。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
OnePlus 13 | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
OnePlus 13 | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
OnePlus 13R | |
Xiaomi 14T | |
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | |
Honor 200 Pro | |
OnePlus 13 |
发言人
OnePlus 13R 的立体声扬声器能发出悦耳的声音,甚至还有一些低音。虽然中音相当均匀,但在我们的粉红噪声测量中,高音略有下降。如果您想从外部播放音乐,可以使用手机的有线 USB-C 端口。此外,还可以使用蓝牙 5.4。
OnePlus 13R audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - OnePlus 13R 充电速度非常快
OnePlus 13R 的电池阳极结合了硅和碳,因此容量高达 6,000 mAh(23.58 Wh)。该储能设备可通过手机的 USB-C 接口以高达 80 瓦的功率充电。与 OnePlus 13 相反,R 机型无法进行无线充电。在测试中,我们注意到使用 小米移动电源 25000.
在闲置模式下,它的功耗并不特别高效。OnePlus 13R 的耗电量超过 2 瓦,是我们最节俭的对比设备的两倍,例如 小米 14T.
耗电量
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
OnePlus 13R 6000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi 14T 5000 mAh | Honor 200 Pro 5200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 4700 mAh | OnePlus 13 6000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -3% | 23% | -11% | -2% | 1% | 12% | 17% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.81 | 1.11 -37% | 0.97 -20% | 1.11 -37% | 0.78 4% | 0.86 -6% | 0.894 ? -10% | 0.87 ? -7% |
Idle Average * | 2.11 | 1.14 46% | 1.12 47% | 2.67 -27% | 1.31 38% | 1.74 18% | 1.316 ? 38% | 1.444 ? 32% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.17 | 1.16 47% | 1.19 45% | 2.75 -27% | 1.36 37% | 1.85 15% | 1.466 ? 32% | 1.592 ? 27% |
Load Average * | 9.2 | 12.33 -34% | 4.13 55% | 8.13 12% | 13.23 -44% | 10.69 -16% | 8.92 ? 3% | 6.9 ? 25% |
Load Maximum * | 11.12 | 15.34 -38% | 12.25 -10% | 8.64 22% | 16.23 -46% | 11.92 -7% | 11.3 ? -2% | 10.3 ? 7% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
运行时间
我们的实际电池测试是在调整显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的条件下进行的,在 Wi-Fi 测试中,这款高端智能手机的电池提供了超过 25 小时的超长续航时间,而在关闭 Wi-Fi 模块的情况下,连续视频播放的续航时间也达到了 40.5 小时。因此,您可以使用这款手机 2 到 3 天而无需使用充电器。
OnePlus 13R 6000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi 14T 5000 mAh | Honor 200 Pro 5200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 4700 mAh | OnePlus 13 6000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -25% | -21% | -34% | -51% | -0% | |
Reader / Idle | 2298 | 1815 -21% | 2016 -12% | 2267 -1% | ||
H.264 | 2428 | 967 -60% | 1313 -46% | 2321 -4% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 1516 | 942 -38% | 1091 -28% | 993 -34% | 749 -51% | 1349 -11% |
Load | 209 | 251 20% | 217 4% | 241 15% |
Notebookcheck 总评分
OnePlus 13R 的超强续航能力给人留下了深刻印象,但遗憾的是,这款高品质的高端手机无法承受骁龙 8 代 3 产生的废热。
OnePlus 13R
- 03/06/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.