Notebookcheck Logo
Oneplus 13R smartphone review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

OnePlus 13R 评测--续航能力惊人、差异惊人的智能手机

还能接受多少节流?

在 OnePlus 13R 上,现实和一厢情愿有时会有些背离。虽然制造商宣传其顶级手机具有 "顶级性能",但在我们的测试中却无法证实这一点。尽管如此,OnePlus 13 的小兄弟还是提供了许多值得购买的积极方面。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

对 OnePlus 13R 的评价

OnePlus 13R 拥有高品质的外观和令人印象深刻的续航能力。它结合了去年的旗舰 SoC、出色的扬声器和漂亮的 LTPO 面板,使 OnePlus 智能手机成为完美的日常伴侣。

然而,这家中国制造商的 R 机型缺少一些高端功能,而这些功能已逐渐成为当今高端智能手机的标准配置。例如,它的 USB 2.0 端口并不能提供该价位手机的最高性能,也不支持无线充电或 eSIM 集成。当许多竞争对手都提供防水保护壳时,OnePlus 13R 的 IP65 等级对于一些潜在买家来说可能是一个决定性的不利因素。

OnePlus 13R 的一大弱点是余热过高,这导致处理器在这款顶级手机中的运行速度明显下降。在峰值时性能降低近三分之二,不仅对我们的整体评分产生了负面影响,而且在日常高强度使用(如长时间游戏或图形要求较高的任务)时也会导致性能波动。

Pros

+ 明亮的 OLED 面板
+ 运行时间长
+ 高质量外壳
+ 性能卓越

Cons

- ...有相当大的节流
- 只有 USB 2.0
- 不支持 eSIM 卡
- 显示屏亮度有差异

价格和供应情况

OnePlus 13R 售价 599.99 美元,可直接从制造商的在线商店订购。.

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
82.9%
OnePlus 13R
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.99
HOMEMO 2 Pack For OnePlus 13...
2. $7.55
Suttkue for OnePlus 13R Scre...
3. $6.59
Natbok 2+2 Pack for OnePlus ...
List Price: 749€
206 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2780x1264
450 PPI
AMOLED
2.
85.4%
OnePlus 12R 5G
OnePlus 12R 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 256 GB 
List Price: 499 EUR207 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"
2780x1264
450 PPI
AMOLED
3.
83.4%
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $9.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi 14T Pro S...
2. $5.98
Aiziki (2 Pack) Designed for...
3. $6.59
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Compatible w...
195 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
4.
80.5%
Honor 200 Pro
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $12.97
YOUULAR [2 Pack Privacy Scre...
2. $13.46
for Honor 200 Pro Screen Pro...
3. $9.99
Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ...
List Price: 800€
199 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2700x1224
437 PPI
OLED
5.
85.7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design...
2. $5.99
Milomdoi 3 Pack Screen Prote...
3. $6.89
amFilm Auto-Alignment OneTou...
213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
385 PPI
AMOLED
6.
87.6%
OnePlus 13
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $12.98
2+2 Pcs Screen Protector One...
2. $9.98
JZG 3pcs for OnePlus 13 Scre...
3. $339.99
OnePlus 10 Pro | 5G Android ...
List Price: 720€
213 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED

OnePlus 13R 采用了与中国制造商旗舰产品 OnePlus 13R 相似的概念。 一加 13.价格更实惠的 13R 机型旨在以其人工智能、高性能和特别大的 6000 毫安时电池给人留下深刻印象。OnePlus 13R 安装的 OLED 显示屏与更昂贵的旗舰机型几乎相同,因为它采用了一块 6.78 英寸、120 Hz LTPO AMOLED 面板,HDR 峰值亮度为 4,500 尼特。

这款顶级 OnePlus 手机以王牌 5 的名义在中国发布,目前只在美国推出了配备 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 内部存储空间的版本。在本次评测中,我们将揭晓 OnePlus 13 还有哪些不同之处。

OnePlus 13R 的规格

OnePlus 13R (13 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.78 inch 19.8:9, 2780 x 1264 pixel 450 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, Aqua Touch 2.0, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 219 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G: 850/900/1.800/1.900 MHz; 3G:1/2/4/5/6/8/19 4G:1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/30/32/66/71; 38/39/40/41/48; 5G: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n26/n28/n30/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n71/n77/n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.02 x 161.72 x 75.77
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-carbon anode
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 24 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (2x optical zoom, f/2.0, 47 mm, tele) + 8 MP (f/2.2, 16 mm, ultra wide), camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.4, 26 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, info material, OxygenOS 15, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, BT Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptx, aptx-HD, LDAC, LHDC (5.0), GNSS: Beidou (B1I+B1C+B2a), GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), Galileo (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5); HDR: Dolby Vision HLG, HDR10+, HDR10; SAR: 0,95 W/kg (head), 1,24 W/kg (body), fanless
Weight
206 g
Price
749 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

手机壳 - IP 等级的 OnePlus 手机

OnePlus 13R 的颜色
OnePlus 13R 的颜色

OnePlus 13R 的外壳质量上乘,做工精美。不过,鉴于其棱角分明的设计,它的握持感可能会更符合人体工程学。这款高档手机有两种颜色可供选择,一种是黑色,背面为磨砂玻璃;另一种是灰色,表面略带纹理。两种颜色都不会留下指纹。

一个小缺点是大猩猩 7i 玻璃保护着它的 6.78 英寸显示屏。与大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 等最新一代产品相比,这种由硅酸铝锂制成的中档玻璃材料在抗摔性方面有些落后。与 OnePlus 13 相比,通过 IP65 认证的外壳缺乏防尘和防水功能是另一个缺点。 一加 13.

即便如此,其 6.78 英寸 OLED 面板周围的边框还是非常窄,给 R 机型带来了非常现代的外观。因此,屏幕与机身正面的尺寸比例达到了 91.2%。OnePlus 13R 还具有 OnePlus 智能手机特有的警报滑动按钮,可用于通知静音。

Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)
Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)
Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)
Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)
Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)
Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)
Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)

尺寸比较

163.3 mm 75.2 mm 8.2 mm 199 g162.9 mm 76.5 mm 8.5 mm 213 g162 mm 77.3 mm 8 mm 213 g161.72 mm 75.77 mm 8.02 mm 206 g160.45 mm 74.34 mm 8.25 mm 186 g160.5 mm 75.1 mm 7.8 mm 195 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - OnePlus 手机仅配备 USB 2.0

相比之下 旗舰相比,R 机型只有一个 USB 2.0 端口。在使用连接的 M2 SSD 硬盘(三星 980 Pro)进行复制测试时,我们测得的传输速度仅为 40 MB/s。连接的存储介质可格式化为 NTFS 或 exFAT。不支持通过端口进行有线图像输出。

除此之外,这款 OnePlus 高端手机还配备了现代蓝牙 5.4、红外爆破器、Miracast 和用于非接触式支付的 NFC 功能。

机箱左侧(警报滑块)
机箱左侧(警报滑块)
机壳右侧(按钮:音量、开关)
机壳右侧(按钮:音量、开关)
机箱底部侧面(扬声器、麦克风、USB 端口、麦克风、卡槽)
机箱底部侧面(扬声器、麦克风、USB 端口、麦克风、卡槽)
机箱顶侧(红外热像仪、麦克风)
机箱顶侧(红外热像仪、麦克风)

软件 - 配有Android 15 的 OnePlus 13R

OnePlus 13R 搭载了该公司自己的 OxygenOS,它基于最新的Android 15。在测试时,安全补丁相当及时,即从 2025 年 1 月开始。根据 OnePlus 的说法,与安全相关的更新将持续 6 年,但 R 机型将提前两年(即 2029 年)收到最后一次 "重要 "Android 更新。这没有问题,但三星或 谷歌在这方面做得还是更持久一些。

除了 Circle to Search 和谷歌的 Gemini 之外,OnePlus 还在其 Oxygen 界面中加入了更多人工智能功能。其中包括 AI 笔记、自带人工智能的智能设备搜索(名为 OnePlus AI)以及基于 AI 的照片和视频编辑。

Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测
Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测
Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测
Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测

可持续性

OnePlus 没有提供任何有关所用材料或其回收率的准确信息。13R 的包装似乎不使用塑料,但设备本身在运输过程中使用了一层薄膜保护--可能由可堆肥的生物塑料制成。包装的其余部分由纸板制成。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - OnePlus 智能手机支持双 GPS

OnePlus 13R 不仅支持现代 "be "标准 WiFi 7,还支持快速的 6 GHz 频段。不过,在我们的测试中,这款高端手机在与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 的配合中表现出了一些弱点。它在 6 GHz WLAN 中的接收数据速度并不快,而且我们使用高通公司的 FastConnect 7800 调制解调器测量的发送数据速率也不太稳定。

OnePlus 13R 最多只能通过 5G 标准访问移动数据网络,并支持多种频率。它在 4G 网络中的频段支持也非常好,与本次测试地德国相关的所有频率都可用。此外,这款高端手机还拥有 25 个 LTE 频段,可在德国以外的地区使用。

Networking
OnePlus 13R
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
957 (min: 927) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
750 (min: 726) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1519 (min: 176) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
451 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼29%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
812 (min: 583) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
861 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼86%
Xiaomi 14T
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
970 (min: 946) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
885 (min: 452) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1817 (min: 914) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1557 (min: 1522) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor 200 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 483) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
828 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
976 (min: 493) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
723 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1844 (min: 1768) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1513 (min: 1431) MBit/s ∼97%
OnePlus 13
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
820 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
791 (min: 705) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1791 (min: 1704) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1464 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼94%
Average Wi-Fi 7
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1020 (min: 556) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1002 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1544 (min: 563) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1517 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
720 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
702 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1437 (min: 521) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1367 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼88%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
OnePlus 13R Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1492 (176-1725)
OnePlus 13 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1791 (1704-1904)
OnePlus 13R Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø450 (397-487)
OnePlus 13 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1437 (769-1573)
OnePlus 13R Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø957 (927-998)
OnePlus 13 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø820 (704-911)
OnePlus 13R Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø749 (726-766)
OnePlus 13 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø790 (705-871)
户外定位服务
户外定位服务
室内定位服务
室内定位服务

在我们的测试中,OnePlus 智能手机在定位功能方面没有表现出任何弱点。室外和室内的精确定位、双 GNSS 支持以及实际测试中良好的路线一致性都对 13R 有利。不过,我们也注意到了一些距离上的小偏差,尤其是在改变方向时。即便如此,作为对比使用的 Garmin Venu 2 的整体路线表现也不相上下,因此即使是要求苛刻的导航任务,我们也可以毫不犹豫地推荐 OnePlus 13R。

OnePus 13R 与 Garmin Venu 2 的对比
OnePus 13R 与 Garmin Venu 2 的对比

电话功能和通话质量 - 不支持 eSIM 卡的 OnePlus 手机

Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测
Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测

OnePlus 13R 的通话质量非常令人满意。在通话过程中,这款高端智能手机的语音传输清晰自然。不过,在嘈杂的环境中,耳机的音量可能会稍大一些。

该手机采用了成熟的双卡双待设置,有两个卡槽。在美国,买家可以选择在系统中集成 eSIM 卡。这在欧洲并不适用。您还可以使用 VoWiFi 和 VoLTE 等功能。

摄像头 - 配备 OIS 的 OnePlus 13R

OnePlus 13R 上的自拍照
OnePlus 13R 上的自拍照

OnePlus 13R 的前置摄像头像素为 1600 万,采用固定对焦,最多只能录制 1080p 的视频。不过,使用该镜头拍摄的照片色彩靓丽、清晰度高。不过,细节的呈现还可以更好一些。

索尼 LYT-700 是该机的核心摄像头,分辨率为 50 万像素,支持 OIS。传感器尺寸为 1/1.56 英寸,虽然不是最大的,但在日光下仍能拍摄出非常出色的照片。但在暗处,照片看起来会越来越模糊,曝光效果也可能会更好。

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
10x
10x
20 倍(最大值)
20 倍(最大值)

分辨率仅为 800 万像素的超广角镜头的质量却差强人意。它的图像清晰度明显下降,尤其是在边缘,而且会出现畸变。该组中的第三个摄像头采用了三星 ISOCELL JN5,分辨率为 50MPix,可无损放大 2 倍拍摄照片。放大 5 倍的照片细节丰富,模糊程度相对较低。

OnePlus 13R 可录制最高 4K60 的视频。即使使用 5000 万像素的主摄像头,也无法拍摄 8K 视频。镜头之间的切换只能在 1080p 视频中进行。

Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测
Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测
Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测
Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测
Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测
Oneplus 13R 智能手机评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleLow lightZoom 5xUltra-wide angle
orginal image
click to load images

在受控照明条件下,我们将索尼主镜头的色彩表现与实际参考色彩进行了对比分析。在描述 ColorChecker Passport 时,50-MPix 镜头显示绿色色调变亮和轻微过饱和。不过,OnePlus 13R 在色彩保真度方面没有表现出任何异常(>10)。总的来说,这款高端手机的校准效果对于智能手机来说非常好。

ColorChecker
3.4 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
0 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 13R: 4.65 ∆E min: 0 - max: 7.97 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
61.2 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
29 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
63 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
74.5 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
86.9 ∆E
69.8 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 13R: 45.86 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 86.94 ∆E

配件和保修 - OnePlus 手机不含电源供应器

OnePlus 13R 的配套电源(图片:OnePlus)
OnePlus 13R 的配套电源(图片:OnePlus)

OnePlus 13R 随附数据线和充电线、SIM 卡针和包含保修信息的快速入门指南。开箱时还直接安装了保护膜。不过,该手机在欧盟并不附带模块化 80 瓦电源或保护盖。不过,如果通过制造商的在线商店购买,将免费获得 SUPERVOOC 充电器。

在美国,该设备享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 配备 FaceUnlock 的 OnePlus 手机

OnePlus 13R 的显示屏上集成了光学指纹传感器,虽然工作可靠,但其质量无法与它的超声波传感器相提并论。 大哥.此外,它的位置太靠屏幕底部,不符合我们的口味。您还可以使用可靠性稍差的 2D 面部识别功能,该功能基于使用前置摄像头的 FaceUnlock(面部解锁)功能。不过,在光线不足的情况下,这个功能并不总能可靠地工作。

除此之外,OnePlus 13R 配有 6.78 英寸 120 Hz OLED 面板,在日常使用中反应灵敏,操作流畅。输入时,线性振动电机(X 轴)可提供清晰的反馈。在日常使用中,特别是在寒冷的季节,它的另一个优势是支持厚度达 5 毫米的天然纤维手套输入。在我们的测试中,较厚的聚酯手套也能正常使用。

显示屏 - OnePlus 13R 采用 LTPO 面板

OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,每个子像素由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。
OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,每个子像素由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。

这款手机的 AMOLED 显示屏分辨率为 1264p,像素密度高达 450 PPI,采用 LTPO 技术,可在 1 Hz 和 120 Hz 之间动态调节刷新率。PWM 调制用于控制屏幕亮度,而屏幕亮度通常会通过屏幕闪烁来显示。值得庆幸的是,我们用示波器测得的频率高达 2,000 Hz 左右,这意味着视觉上可感知的亮度波动应该不会影响眼睛--即使是敏感的用户。

根据其数据表,OnePlus 13R 的面板峰值亮度为 4,500 尼特,但我们在测试过程中的任何测量都没有达到这一数值。虽然我们在使用 APL18 模式时能够达到 1,262 cd/m² 的亮度,但在播放 4K 视频材料时,亮度却下降到了 1,086 cd/m²。这意味着 HDR 内容是可以察觉到的,但如果使用小米 14T Pro,效果会更好。 小米 14T Pro(4,407 cd/m²)的效果要好得多。

1215
cd/m²
1217
cd/m²
1184
cd/m²
1213
cd/m²
1213
cd/m²
1192
cd/m²
1215
cd/m²
1218
cd/m²
1190
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1218 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1206.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.11 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1213 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
OnePlus 13R
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Xiaomi 14T
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Honor 200 Pro
OLED, 2700x1224, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
OnePlus 13
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Screen
-2%
7%
11%
-9%
2%
Brightness middle
1213
1034
-15%
1012
-17%
1208
0%
1211
0%
1155
-5%
Brightness
1206
1035
-14%
1016
-16%
1194
-1%
1214
1%
1155
-4%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
95
-2%
98
1%
99
2%
98
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.1
-10%
0.7
30%
0.9
10%
1.6
-60%
1
-0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.3
1.9
17%
1.8
22%
1.4
39%
2.4
-4%
1.8
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
1.4
12%
1.2
25%
1.3
19%
1.5
6%
1.6
-0%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.22 99%
2.19 100%
2.29 96%
2.13 103%
2.3 96%
CCT
6546 99%
6674 97%
6489 100%
6413 101%
6456 101%
6503 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 Hz
Amplitude: 14.15 %
Secondary Frequency: 2000 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8584 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。

OxgenOS 在显示设置中提供了多种自定义选项。您可以从四个色彩配置文件中进行选择,并调整 OLED 面板的白平衡。使用 "自然 "配置文件,我们通过控制 sRGB 色彩空间实现了最精确的校准。灰度和色彩的 DeltaE 值都很低,与参考数据几乎没有明显差异。

色彩准确度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.659 ms rise
↘ 0.6405 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.706 ms rise
↘ 1.913 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

这款顶级手机在户外表现非常出色。即使在阳光充足、玻璃表面反光的情况下,内容依然清晰易读。不过,OLED 显示屏的亮度储备有限,"只有 "1,250 cd/m²,而竞争对手往往亮度极高。 亮度相比,OLED 显示屏的亮度储备 "仅 "为 1,250 cd/m²。值得注意的是,在未激活环境光传感器的情况下,其最大亮度仅为 816 cd/m²。

OnePlus 13R 的可视角度长时间保持稳定,只有从非常平的角度观看时面板才会明显变暗。

性能 - OnePlus 智能手机配备高通 SoC 芯片

虽然 骁龙 8 代 3已不再是高通公司 旗舰 SoC但去年的芯片组仍然非常强大。在 Geekbench CPU 基准测试中,这款配备 12GB DDR5X 内存的顶级手机表现非常出色。不过,它在 PCMark 和 CrossMark 系统测试中的数值却相当低。即使是 骁龙 8s Gen 3Honor 200 Pro也比 OnePlus 13R 做得更好。

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3087 Points +39%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2214 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (954 - 2329, n=23)
2115 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
2066 Points -7%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1821 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=188, last 2 years)
1508 Points -32%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1440 Points -35%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1424 Points -36%
Multi-Core
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9369 Points +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4564 - 7501, n=23)
6641 Points +1%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6605 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
6341 Points -4%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4602 Points -30%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4547 Points -31%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4423 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=188, last 2 years)
4271 Points -35%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2192 Points +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1343 - 1702, n=16)
1651 Points 0%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1647 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
1581 Points -4%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1413 Points -14%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1090 Points -34%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1085 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (139 - 2437, n=170, last 2 years)
1069 Points -35%
Multi-Core
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
6789 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5393 - 6543, n=16)
6013 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
5622 Points +3%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5474 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4279 Points -22%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4188 Points -23%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4155 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 8816, n=170, last 2 years)
3594 Points -34%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2762122 Points +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1390723 - 2162423, n=19)
1924113 Points +9%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1772142 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
1516996 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1465265 Points -17%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1399064 Points -21%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1329696 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=124, last 2 years)
1310811 Points -26%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19793 Points +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (12156 - 21628, n=22)
17649 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
17338 Points +33%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
16008 Points +22%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
14751 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
14716 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=194, last 2 years)
13563 Points +4%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
13085 Points
CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2485 Points +129%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
1263 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (983 - 1474, n=15)
1240 Points +14%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1112 Points +3%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1083 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
987 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=166, last 2 years)
954 Points -12%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
946 Points -13%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10937 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8148 - 10966, n=18)
9940 Points +7%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
9273 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
8827 Points -5%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8433 Points -9%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8039 Points -13%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7122 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 13729, n=160, last 2 years)
6608 Points -29%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
14627 Points +16%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
14039 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8611 - 16015, n=18)
13968 Points +11%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12637 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
12177 Points -4%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
11587 Points -8%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
11299 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 19891, n=160, last 2 years)
10420 Points -18%
Memory
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12087 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11536 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (7426 - 12716, n=18)
10761 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
9036 Points -25%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8722 Points -28%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7784 Points -36%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7735 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=160, last 2 years)
7221 Points -40%
Graphics
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
43637 Points +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (26972 - 39727, n=18)
33762 Points +21%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
29006 Points +4%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
27837 Points
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
27809 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
23338 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=160, last 2 years)
18693 Points -33%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
16594 Points -40%
Web
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2091 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
1982 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1661 - 2145, n=18)
1956 Points +11%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1763 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1734 Points -2%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1676 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1636 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=160, last 2 years)
1592 Points -10%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
64597 Points +376%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
57997 Points +328%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
22767 Points +68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=151, last 2 years)
18072 Points +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (11487 - 18370, n=17)
16366 Points +21%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13576 Points 0%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
13564 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
11738 Points -13%
AImark - Score v3.x
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
231543 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (963 - 245629, n=16)
103391 Points -55%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
38828 Points -83%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
33858 Points -85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
27025 Points -88%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1982 Points -99%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
1173 Points -99%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1122 Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=29, last 2 years)
1980 Points +280%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1375 Points +164%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (483 - 1126, n=5)
781 Points +50%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
521 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=29, last 2 years)
1227 Points +448%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
654 Points +192%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (219 - 492, n=5)
343 Points +53%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
224 Points
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
689 Points +193%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=29, last 2 years)
452 Points +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (235 - 491, n=5)
352 Points +50%
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
235 Points
AI Benchmark - Score V6
OnePlus 13R
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
7987 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5170 - 7987, n=3)
6163 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 10957, n=33, last 2 years)
4033 Points -50%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
734 Points -91%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192
598 Points -93%

安装的 Adreno 750是一款功能强大的 GPU,它没有理由躲避高端竞争产品--恰恰相反。在 GFXBench 测试中,我们注意到 OnePlus 13R 和三星 S24 FEi 之间的差距约为 30%。 三星Galaxy S24 FEXclipse 940.不过,13R 的屏幕数值限制在 60fps 令人惊讶。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6789 Points +40%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4854 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4378 Points -10%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3153 Points -35%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3085 Points -36%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3076 Points -37%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6754 Points +38%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4891 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4329 Points -11%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3079 Points -37%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3068 Points -37%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3056 Points -38%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25785 Points +35%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19048 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13847 Points -27%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12004 Points -37%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11204 Points -41%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11001 Points -42%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11821 Points +41%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8398 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7948 Points -5%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5177 Points -38%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4953 Points -41%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11879 Points +42%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8364 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7894 Points -6%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5183 Points -38%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5145 Points -38%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2567 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1803 Points +6%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1706 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1065 Points -38%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1036 Points -39%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2599 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1821 Points +11%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1636 Points
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1221 Points -25%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1055 Points -36%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
768 fps +41%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
545 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
462 fps -15%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
455 fps -17%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
454 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
384 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps +30%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
387 fps
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
270 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
269 fps -30%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps -45%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
185 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +95%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
116 fps +93%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
365 fps +37%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
266 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
215 fps -19%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
171 fps -36%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
170 fps -36%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps -41%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps +72%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps +37%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +35%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +35%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps -18%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps -31%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -31%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99 fps -38%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps +67%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps +10%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps +10%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -15%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +1%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps -40%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps -41%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps +95%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps +55%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +52%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
321 fps +44%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
223 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
154 fps -31%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
135 fps -39%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
133 fps -40%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -50%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +27%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -27%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -41%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -41%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20 fps -51%

在日常使用中,OnePlus 13R 浏览器的速度完全没有问题;在 OnePlus 13R 上打开网站的速度很快,滚动浏览也很流畅。相比之下,OnePlus 手机在浏览器基准测试中的成绩相当弱,无论我们使用的是谷歌 Chrome 浏览器还是微软 Edge 浏览器。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
238.78 Points +107%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
182.387 Points +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (64.1 - 241, n=21)
154.3 Points +34%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
134.031 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=170, last 2 years)
130.3 Points +13%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
115.454 Points
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
70.555 Points -39%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
59.665 Points -48%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
31.6 runs/min +257%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
16 runs/min +81%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=84, last 2 years)
12.4 runs/min +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4.3 - 17.2, n=12)
11.7 runs/min +32%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
8.86 runs/min
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
6.62 runs/min -25%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
3.54 runs/min -60%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
235 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
187 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=17)
160.3 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
140 Points +3%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
136 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=160, last 2 years)
122.3 Points -10%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
103 Points -24%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
61 Points -55%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
92054 Points +121%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
64838 Points +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 72665, n=21)
50945 Points +22%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
46286 Points +11%
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
41734 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=208, last 2 years)
40641 Points -3%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
35853 Points -14%
Honor 200 Pro
28536 Points -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
1899.3 ms * -89%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=169, last 2 years)
1469 ms * -47%
Honor 200 Pro
1456.4 ms * -45%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
1007.2 ms * -0%
OnePlus 13R (Edge 133)
1002.6 ms *
OnePlus 13R (Chrome 133)
972.4 ms * +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (546 - 2066, n=19)
843 ms * +16%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)
598.12 ms * +40%
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
432.7 ms * +57%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 13R 在存储连接方面拥有很高的价值。这款采用 UFS 4.0 标准的高端手机在我们的测试中提供了非常出色的读写速度,尤其是在处理小数据块时。

OnePlus 13RXiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GXiaomi 14THonor 200 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 FEOnePlus 13Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
-2%
-42%
-57%
-10%
-11%
-42%
Sequential Read 256KB
3987.44
3824.7
-4%
3605.16
-10%
1992.32
-50%
1783.43
-55%
3984.23
0%
Sequential Write 256KB
3201.32
3642.57
14%
3294.31
3%
1644.98
-49%
631.23
-80%
3684.36
15%
2633 ?(555 - 3361, n=32)
-18%
Random Read 4KB
374.54
355.7
-5%
403.97
8%
276.23
-26%
312.98
-16%
301.29
-20%
Random Write 4KB
542.13
467.74
-14%
493.57
-9%
321.09
-41%
127.53
-76%
344.63
-36%
412 ?(51 - 730, n=32)
-24%

游戏 - OnePlus 13R 实现了 120fps 的速度

在 GFXBench 屏幕测试中,OnePlus 手机未能达到 60 帧/秒大关,我们认为它不会给我们带来真正的游戏惊喜。然而,我们记录到的帧率却让我们大吃一惊。使用GameBench 应用程序来看看 120 Hz 面板每秒能显示多少帧。

根据制造商的说法,R 机型使用内部 CPU 调度器来提高 骁龙 8 代 3在游戏过程中的效率。因此,它在运行《源氏冲击》时的功耗降低了 3%,这反过来又减少了发热量,还能确保更稳定的帧率。在高细节的情况下,我们最初测得这款奇幻动作角色扮演游戏的平均帧数为 58fps(目前在Android 上还无法达到每秒 60 帧以上)。但大约 10 分钟后,由于散热过高,帧速率明显下降,低于 50fps 的临界值。在 20 分钟的测量过程中,OnePlus 13R 稳定在 44 到 47fps 左右。

在运行《PUBG Mobile》时,我们可以在低图形设置下使用面板的 120 Hz 刷新率。然而,在中等细节(高清模式)下,OnePlus 13R 只能达到典型的 60 帧/秒,而当我们在测试过程中提高图形细节(UHD)时,Adreno 图形单元则能稳定地达到 40 帧/秒。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
OnePlus 13R; Genshin Impact: Ø52.1 (45-61)
OnePlus 13R; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø119.6 (113-121)
OnePlus 13R; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (56-61)
OnePlus 13R; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (38-41)

排放 - OnePlus 手机被节流

温度

OnePlus 13R 的散热效率很低,导致日常使用时机壳背面的表面温度很高。在 3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试中,高发热量导致其系统性能下降高达 65%。由于 骁龙 8 代 3的极端节流,在日常使用中很可能会出现负载下性能下降的情况。

Max. Load
 45.7 °C45.6 °C44.5 °C 
 45.7 °C45.6 °C44.2 °C 
 44.8 °C43.8 °C44.1 °C 
Maximum: 45.7 °C
Average: 44.9 °C
42.5 °C43.4 °C43 °C
42.5 °C44.3 °C44.7 °C
40.3 °C43.2 °C43 °C
Maximum: 44.7 °C
Average: 43 °C
Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78.7 % +100%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.4 % +91%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.1 % +70%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.7 % +41%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.4 % +36%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39.4 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.4 % +80%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.8 % +78%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.8 % +67%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 % +41%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 % +36%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37.5 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.5 % +89%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.2 % +86%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.4 % +81%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.8 % +45%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48.1 % +37%
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35.1 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 13R
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
70.6 %
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.8 % -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.2 % -16%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.4 % -17%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.7 % -28%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22 (11.3-30.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.4 (14.5-23.1)
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.9 (38.8-98.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø56.6 (49.7-74.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø19.6 (17.2-25.5)
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.5 (10.1-28.8)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø20.8 (17.3-27.2)
OnePlus 13R Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10.4 (8.89-12.6)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.73 (8.08-13.6)

发言人

OnePlus 13R 的立体声扬声器能发出悦耳的声音,甚至还有一些低音。虽然中音相当均匀,但在我们的粉红噪声测量中,高音略有下降。如果您想从外部播放音乐,可以使用手机的有线 USB-C 端口。此外,还可以使用蓝牙 5.4。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203328.62527.525.83122.8244026.331.35036.437.96321.133.38020.733.510019.641.612512.64516016.351.920016.352.225013.157.631512.460.94001061.650010.869.163012.47180011.972.7100011.677.1125012.479.9160011.677.5200011.379.4250011.980.9315012.180.9400013.180.6500013.176.7630013.773.1800013.370.11000013.674.61250013.7711600014.267.1SPL24.690N0.680.3median 12.6median 72.7Delta1.19.140.543.932.243.833.238.931.139.838.546.526.141.924.642.919.547.818.348.416.354.815.455.3146015.160.913.259.511.564.911.864.713.470.515.276.313.381.31378.512.782.313.980.714.281.21484.914.681.413.775.313.674.813.574.813.46512.658.125.991.90.786.4median 13.7median 74.8110.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 13RSamsung Galaxy S24 FE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 13R audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - OnePlus 13R 充电速度非常快

OnePlus 13R 的电池阳极结合了硅和碳,因此容量高达 6,000 mAh(23.58 Wh)。该储能设备可通过手机的 USB-C 接口以高达 80 瓦的功率充电。与 OnePlus 13 相反,R 机型无法进行无线充电。在测试中,我们注意到使用 小米移动电源 25000.

在闲置模式下,它的功耗并不特别高效。OnePlus 13R 的耗电量超过 2 瓦,是我们最节俭的对比设备的两倍,例如 小米 14T.

耗电量

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.24 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.81 / 2.11 / 2.17 Watt
Load midlight 9.2 / 11.12 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 13R
6000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 14T
5000 mAh
Honor 200 Pro
5200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
4700 mAh
OnePlus 13
6000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-3%
23%
-11%
-2%
1%
12%
17%
Idle Minimum *
0.81
1.11
-37%
0.97
-20%
1.11
-37%
0.78
4%
0.86
-6%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 1.5, n=17)
-10%
Idle Average *
2.11
1.14
46%
1.12
47%
2.67
-27%
1.31
38%
1.74
18%
1.316 ?(0.81 - 2.11, n=17)
38%
Idle Maximum *
2.17
1.16
47%
1.19
45%
2.75
-27%
1.36
37%
1.85
15%
1.466 ?(0.85 - 2.6, n=17)
32%
Load Average *
9.2
12.33
-34%
4.13
55%
8.13
12%
13.23
-44%
10.69
-16%
Load Maximum *
11.12
15.34
-38%
12.25
-10%
8.64
22%
16.23
-46%
11.92
-7%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
OnePlus 13R Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.58 (0.652-11.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.2 (0.989-16.4)
OnePlus 13R Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.677 (0.645-0.75)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.979-1.652)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
OnePlus 13R Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.8 (10.5-10.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11 (9.75-15.3)
OnePlus 13R Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.677 (0.645-0.75)
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.979-1.652)

运行时间

我们的实际电池测试是在调整显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的条件下进行的,在 Wi-Fi 测试中,这款高端智能手机的电池提供了超过 25 小时的超长续航时间,而在关闭 Wi-Fi 模块的情况下,连续视频播放的续航时间也达到了 40.5 小时。因此,您可以使用这款手机 2 到 3 天而无需使用充电器。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
38h 18min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 133)
25h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
40h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 29min
OnePlus 13R
6000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 14T
5000 mAh
Honor 200 Pro
5200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
4700 mAh
OnePlus 13
6000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-25%
-21%
-34%
-51%
-0%
Reader / Idle
2298
1815
-21%
2016
-12%
2267
-1%
H.264
2428
967
-60%
1313
-46%
2321
-4%
WiFi v1.3
1516
942
-38%
1091
-28%
993
-34%
749
-51%
1349
-11%
Load
209
251
20%
217
4%
241
15%

Notebookcheck 总评分

OnePlus 13R 的超强续航能力给人留下了深刻印象,但遗憾的是,这款高品质的高端手机无法承受骁龙 8 代 3 产生的废热。

OnePlus 13R - 03/06/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
52 / 69 → 75%
Weight
88%
Battery
94%
Display
92%
Games Performance
30 / 55 → 54%
Application Performance
66 / 85 → 78%
AI Performance
15%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 90 → 92%
Camera
78%
Average
63%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
96.3%
Repairability
20%
Software Updates
89%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 42.6%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > OnePlus 13R 评测--续航能力惊人、差异惊人的智能手机
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-03- 9 (Update: 2025-03- 9)