华硕 ProArt PZ13 评测--配备骁龙 X Plus 的耐用 OLED 可折叠手机

Name: Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306
Brand: Asus

适用于旅途中的创作者。华硕新推出的 ProArt PZ13 是一款相对坚固的可转换设备，适合希望在恶劣条件下完成工作的创意用户。该设备采用高通公司最新的 8 核 Snapdragon X Plus 处理器，可确保较长的运行时间。不过，与其他 ProArt 机型一样，它的 OLED 触摸屏也被限制在 60 Hz。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL /Ninh Duy) Published 09/14/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
ARM AI Convertible / 2-in-1 Laptop / Notebook Snapdragon X Series Touchscreen Wi-Fi 7 Windows

华硕的 ProArt 系列产品专门面向内容创作者，他们希望能够随时随地进行创作，而且在这样做的时候，不必放弃触摸屏，例如使用笔输入。在对大型 ProArt P16和紧凑型 ProArt PX13(都采用了最新的 AMD 处理器）之后，现在我们来看看该系列的第三款产品，即 ProArt PZ13。

这款设备是一款带可拆卸键盘的可转换设备，除其他功能外，它还能更好地保护设备免受外界环境的影响。它的处理器选择尤其有趣，因为它使用了新型 8 核高通骁龙 X PlusARM 处理器，从而确保了较长的运行时间和充足的电力。除此之外，这款 13.3 英寸设备的 OLED 触摸屏只能以 60 Hz 的频率运行，这与其他 ProArt 机型相同。目前，你可以以 1,099.99 美元的价格购买配备 16 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD 的机型，其中包括带键盘的两件式保护套和华硕触控笔 2.0。

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

ProArt PZ13 Standard Mode

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 8 x - 3.4 GHz, Oryon

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Core: 1107 MHz, Memory: 1056 MHz, 31.0.67.0

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5x-8448, Dual-Channel, onboard

Display

13.30 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 255 PPI, Capacitive, ATNA33AA08-0, OLED, glossy: yes, detachable screen, HDR, 60 Hz

Storage

WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00, 1024 GB

, M.2 PCIe, 900 GB free

Connections

2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Card Reader: SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Qualcomm FastConnect 7800 (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9 x 297.5 x 202.9

Battery

70 Wh Lithium-Ion, 3-cell

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: Front & Rear Webcam + IR
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65W PSU, Keyboard Cover, Rear Cover with Kickstand, Asus Pen 2.0, ProCreator Hub, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

874 g, Power Supply: 223 g

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.3 %	v8	09/2024	Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	874 g	9 mm	13.30"	2880x1800
85.7 %	v7 ^(old)	04/2024	Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M	928 g	9.8 mm	14.00"	2560x1600
82.5 %	v8	07/2024	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	870 g	9.3 mm	13.00"	2880x1920
80.7 %	v8	08/2024	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	872 g	9.3 mm	13.00"	2880x1920
89.2 %	v8	07/2024	Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU	579 g	5.1 mm	13.00"	2752x2064
89.1 %	v7 ^(old)	04/2023	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1.6 kg	14.2 mm	13.40"	2560x1600

请注意：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息请点击此处.

外壳 - 通过 IP52 认证的平板电脑

ProArt PZ13 本质上是一款黑色背面的 Windows 平板电脑。它的厚度也相对较厚，仅为 9 毫米，这也为它带来了非常优质、稳定的手感。该设备不会被扭曲，我们也没有注意到它发出吱吱嘎嘎的声音。它的黑色机背设计乍看之下有些乏味，但其中也有不少细节，比如屏幕四周斜面上的图案，这应该会让人联想到高品质的相机。它的金属结构完美无瑕。

根据华硕的说法，PZ13 通过了 IP52 认证，具有更强的防尘、防水、防极端温度（-30 至 70 °C）和防震功能。例如，风扇出风口安装了一个额外的过滤器，可以防止灰尘进入，三个接口中有两个被橡胶盖板封闭。

这两个盖子采用了苔绿色的配色，为机身增添了几分色彩。盖子的一部分通过磁力吸附在平板电脑背面，有一个用于后置摄像头和风扇出风口的孔。此外，它还可以用作脚架，这是平板电脑本身不具备的功能。此外，它还为附带的触控笔提供了一个标签。后盖的坚固程度令人惊讶，你可以通过脚架将平板电脑抬起。键盘盖的厚度为 6 毫米，也相当厚实和稳定。它通过底部的磁铁和小针与平板电脑连接。此外，两个盖子都能保护外壳，防止刮伤和损坏。

平板电脑本身的厚度为 9 毫米，重 874 克。加上两个盖子，厚度为 17 毫米，重量超过 1.5 千克，比很多笔记本电脑都重。65 瓦的电源额外增加了 223 克。

尺寸比较

Minisforum V3 Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - USB 4 和 Wi-Fi 7

ProArt PZ13 的连接功能非常有限，只有两个 USB-C 端口（USB 4.0）和一个全功能读卡器。所有端口都在左上方，一个 USB 端口和读卡器位于橡胶盖下面。没有 3.5 毫米音频接口。

USB-C 4.0（40 Gbit/s，DisplayPort ALT 模式，电力传输），SD 读卡器，USB-C 4.0（40 Gbit/s，DisplayPort ALT 模式，电力传输）

SD 读卡器

ProArt PZ13 配备了一个功能齐全的 SD 读卡器，其供货范围还包括一个 microSD 卡适配器。结合我们的参考卡，其最大传输速率超过 210 MB/s，复制图像时约为 200 MB/s，总的来说效果非常好。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	208.8 MB/s +6%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	197 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	189.5 (184.93^min - 191.52^max) MB/s -4%
Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=30, last 2 years)	82.4 MB/s -58%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	219.2 MB/s +1%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	216.7 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	209.84 MB/s -3%
Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=29, last 2 years)	98.1 MB/s -55%

交流

小型 Snapdragon X Plus 处理器配备了与更昂贵的高通芯片相同的 WLAN 模块。除蓝牙 5.4 外，FastConnect 7800 还支持 Wi-Fi 7，但遗憾的是我们还无法对其进行测试。结合华硕的参考路由器，我们测得的接收速率非常好，而发送性能可能会更好一些。不过，我们在测试期间从未遇到过任何信号质量问题。

目前，PZ13 还没有 5G 版本，但实际上它已经注定要使用 5G 技术。微软的新 Surface Pro(同样采用 ARM CPU）将于今年晚些时候发布 5G 版本。Apple's iPad Pro 13在这种情况下具有明显的优势，即使其 5G 调制解调器的价格为 200 美元。

Networking
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm FastConnect 7800
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1495 (min: 1407) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1753 (min: 1726) MBit/s ∼100%
Minisforum V3 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	584 (min: 532) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	899 (min: 885) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1421 (min: 1274) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1471 (min: 1330) MBit/s ∼90%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm FastConnect 7800
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1463 (min: 1282) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1705 (min: 1629) MBit/s ∼97%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	658 (min: 447) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	607 (min: 509) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1196 (min: 901) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	978 (min: 615) MBit/s ∼60%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1601 (min: 1470) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1642 (min: 821) MBit/s ∼100%

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1496 (1407-1554)

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1752 (1726-1778)

网络摄像头

PZ13 配备了两个摄像头。除了 500 万像素的前置摄像头（+IR 用于人脸识别）外，背面还有一个 1300 万像素的传感器。最重要的是，它的图像清晰度明显优于一般的 1080p 机型，而且还支持 Windows Studio 特效。此外，还有三个麦克风可用于清晰的语音录制。

ColorChecker Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 14.02 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 25.97 ∆E

维护

用户无法打开 PZ13 的外壳，也不提供任何维护选项。

输入设备 - 行程为 1.35 毫米的键盘

由于其良好的稳定性和 1.35 毫米的键程，这款可拆卸的照明键盘为敞篷车提供了非常舒适的键入体验，但它无法与出色的键盘相媲美，如 ProArt P X13.键盘布局（包括副驾驶键）并不复杂，但方向键非常小。点击板漂亮、顺滑，大小适中，只是机械点击的声音有点大。我们只用点击键盘输入，操作起来没有任何问题。用手或触控笔使用电容式触摸屏时也是如此。

显示屏 - 3K OLED，60 Hz

与当前其他两款 ProArt 设备一样，华硕在 PZ13 上安装了一块高分辨率 OLED 触摸屏（2880 x 1800 像素，16:10），但遗憾的是其刷新率仅为 60 Hz。因此，动作看起来并不像在高频率屏幕上那样如天鹅绒般顺滑。从主观上看，光线表面的颗粒感也对画质造成了轻微的负面影响。色彩看起来超级鲜艳，用户可以享受到深邃的黑色和快速的响应时间。面板的亮度和色温可通过传感器根据环境光线条件自动调节。

在 SDR 工作模式下，其最大亮度为 363 cd/m²，由于黑色值较低，该显示屏拥有非常高的对比度。这个数值并不差，但现在市场上已经有很多亮度更高的 OLED 面板。在 HDR 工作模式下，我们注意到在显示小图像摘录时最高亮度为 605 cd/m²，在几乎全白的屏幕上最高亮度为 549 cd/m²。


366 cd/m²	364 cd/m²	363 cd/m²
365 cd/m²	362 cd/m²	364 cd/m²
363 cd/m²	362 cd/m²	363 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

ATNA33AA08-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 366 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 363.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 362 cd/m²
Contrast: 36200:1 (Black: 0.01 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12

	Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 ATNA33AA08-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz	Minisforum V3 BOE, NE140QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 165 Hz	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ ATNA30DW01-1, OLED, 2880x1920, 13", 120 Hz	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ LP129WT342166, IPS, 2880x1920, 13", 120 Hz	Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Tandem OLED, 2752x2064, 13", 120 Hz	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V TL134ADXP01-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4", 165 Hz
Display		-2%	-0%	-9%		-3%
Display P3 Coverage	99.5	97.7 -2%	98.9 -1%	83.4 -16%		97 -3%
sRGB Coverage	99.6	99.8 0%	99.4 0%	99.7 0%		99.9 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	89.9	85.4 -5%	89.5 0%	79.4 -12%		85.3 -5%
Response Times		-508%	79%	-1824%	-23%	-342%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	1.54 ?(0.83, 0.71)	10 ?(3, 7) -549%	0.32 ?(0.17, 0.15) 79%	39.6 ?(18.1, 21.5) -2471%	3.39 ?(1.606, 1.784) -120%	6.5 ?(3.1, 3.4) -322%
Response Time Black / White *	1.41 ?(0.76, 0.65)	8 ?(3, 5) -467%	0.58 ?(0.29, 0.29) 59%	18 ?(7, 11) -1177%	0.69 ?(0.304, 0.3845) 51%	6.5 ?(3.1, 3.4) -361%
PWM Frequency	240 ?(50)		480 ?(69) 100%		240 0%
Screen		-651%	-12%	-687%	66%	-555%
Brightness middle	362	512 41%	580 60%	585 62%	1000 176%	537 48%
Brightness	364	495 36%	581 60%	574 58%	1010 177%	511 40%
Brightness Distribution	99	91 -8%	99 0%	89 -10%	98 -1%	88 -11%
Black Level *	0.01	0.48 -4700%	0.04 -300%	0.56 -5500%		0.45 -4400%
Contrast	36200	1067 -97%	14500 -60%	1045 -97%		1193 -97%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.5	4.32 -188%	0.7 53%	1.3 13%	1 33%	1.49 1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.1	7.04 -127%	2.1 32%	3 3%	2.5 19%	3.68 -19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	4.22 -164%	0.6 62%	2 -25%	1.7 -6%	1.66 -4%
Gamma	2.12 ^104%	2.31 ^95%	2.16 ^102%	2.18 ^101%	2.21 ^100%	2.43 ^91%
CCT	6514 ^100%	6770 ^96%	6484 ^100%	6914 ^94%	6661 ^98%	6772 ^96%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		4.17				1.12
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-387% / -479%	22% / 10%	-840% / -706%	22% / 37%	-300% / -395%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：显示 P3，目标色彩空间：P3）

我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）对面板进行了分析，像往常一样，有多种不同的色彩配置文件可供选择。原生色彩配置文件适合日常使用，但会使色彩过度饱和。因此，要获得最准确的色彩描绘，您应该选择显示 P3 配置文件。如果你喜欢编辑照片，还可以选择精确的 sRGB 模式。屏幕完全覆盖 sRGB 色彩空间和 P3 空间。

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.76 ms rise
1.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.65 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.83 ms rise
1.54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.71 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz
Amplitude: 67 %

≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17271 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

OLED 面板采用 60 赫兹直流调光，亮度可达 50%。在这种情况下，振幅非常小，因此在使用过程中不会出现问题。亮度低于 50%时，则采用 240 Hz 的常规 PWM 闪烁，振幅明显更大，可能对人体造成更严重的伤害。华硕提供了 "无闪烁 OLED 调光 "功能，其中直流调光在低亮度水平下也能工作。

在室外，闪亮的触摸屏反光会成为一个问题，因此应尽量避免光源直射身后。除了在广角时会有轻微的蓝色光泽（OLED 的正常现象）外，其视角稳定性非常好。

性能 - Snapdragon X Plus

ProArt PZ13 只有一种配置。新的 8 核骁龙 X Plus 与无法升级的 16 GB 内存（LPDDR5x-8448）相结合。

测试条件

预装的 ProArt Creator 集线器共有三种风扇配置文件：低声、标准 和 高性能。下表提供了不同配置文件的概览。我们无法获得准确的 TDP 值，但根据配置文件的不同，SoC 的功耗应在 15-25 瓦之间。

风扇配置文件	Cinebench 2024 Multi	3DMark Steel Nomad Light	最大风扇噪音排放
Whisper	534 分	1,145 分	30.6 dB(A)
标准	556 分	1,148 分	40 dB(A)
性能	685 分	1,151 分	44.8 dB(A)

我们使用模式标准进行了基准测试和测量。风扇配置文件性能在电池运行时不可用。

处理器 - X1P-42-100

ProArt PZ13 配备了全新的 8 核骁龙 X Plus (X1P-42-100)，我们最近已经在华硕 Vivobook S 15.它是目前高通公司骁龙 X 系列中速度最慢的芯片。这款 ARM 处理器有 8 个内核，最高主频为 3.2 GHz，单核涡轮增压主频为 3.4 GHz。更多技术细节请参阅我们的分析文章。

总体而言，它的单核性能与小型骁龙 X Elite（X1E-78-100）等更昂贵的骁龙机型相当，总体表现相当不错。Surface Pro OLED Surface Pro OLED采用 X1E-80-100（主频提升 4GHz）的 Surface Pro OLED 则快 14-21%，具体取决于测试结果和Apple 的被动冷却 M4 SoC。 iPad Pro在 Geekbench 单项测试中，iPad Pro 的被动散热 M4 SoC 比其高出 58%，这完全是两个不同的级别。

在多核测试中，ProArt PZ13 只能排在最后一位，但对于大多数应用来说，这已经足够了。下图显示了不同风扇配置文件的时钟频率。在性能模式下，它的平均时钟频率为 2.9 GHz；在标准模式下，我们测得的时钟频率为 2.3 GHz；在耳语模式下，它的时钟频率为 2.2 GHz。

Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core | Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	893 Points +61%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	795 Points +43%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	748 Points +35%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	556 Points

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	123 Points +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	109 Points +1%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	108 Points
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	98 Points -9%

Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash	14690 Points +36%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	14458 Points +33%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	13278 Points +23%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	11144 Points +3%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	10833 Points

Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash	3715 Points +58%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2845 Points +21%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2537 Points +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	2445 Points +4%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2353 Points

CPU 数据 Cinebench 2024 Multi（红色：高性能，蓝色：标准，绿色：低功耗）

除了本机测试外，我们还进行了所有常用的 CPU 基准测试，但这些测试都必须在 Snapdragon 设备上进行模拟。这样做的代价是性能下降，这就是为什么 PZ13 在对比表中排名垫底的原因。此外，它的多核性能并不稳定，必须面对约 25% 的不足。在电池工作状态下，其性能没有进一步下降。更多 CPU 基准测试可在我们的技术部分。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100: Ø1045 (979.5-1418.74)

Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U: Ø2038 (2014.3-2051.07)

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100: Ø1696 (1626.02-2248.71)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100: Ø1433 (1369.72-1988.86)

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2466 (2355.02-2908.24)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	87.2 pt
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	69.7 pt
Average of class Convertible	57.1 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	53.6 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	44.7 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	37.4 pt
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	35.9 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	17959 Points +179%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	12972 Points +101%
Average of class Convertible (616 - 18070, n=61, last 2 years)	10117 Points +57%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	9927 Points +54%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	8644 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (6442 - 7144, n=2)	6793 Points +5%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	6442 Points

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	2038 Points +84%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	1701 Points +53%
Average of class Convertible (308 - 1970, n=61, last 2 years)	1609 Points +45%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1321 Points +19%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	1129 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1109 - 1128, n=2)	1119 Points +1%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	1109 Points

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	6921 Points +193%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	5067 Points +115%
Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=61, last 2 years)	3815 Points +62%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	3640 Points +54%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	3252 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2361 - 2681, n=2)	2521 Points +7%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	2361 Points

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	792 Points +95%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	665 Points +64%
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 755, n=60, last 2 years)	617 Points +52%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	490 Points +21%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	420 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (406 - 425, n=2)	416 Points +2%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	406 Points

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	2908 Points +105%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	2249 (1626.02^min - 2248.71^max) Points +58%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2024 Points +43%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	1989 (1369.72^min - 1988.86^max) Points +40%
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=63, last 2 years)	1692 Points +19%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	1419 (979.5^min - 1418.74^max) Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1383 - 1419, n=2)	1401 Points -1%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	295 Points +43%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	263 Points +27%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	248 Points +20%
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=60, last 2 years)	235 Points +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	209 Points +1%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	207 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (207 - 207, n=2)	207 Points 0%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	571 Seconds *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (466 - 571, n=2)	519 Seconds * +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	402 Seconds * +30%
Average of class Convertible (193 - 1059, n=57, last 2 years)	369 Seconds * +35%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	351 Seconds * +39%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	239 Seconds * +58%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	193 Seconds * +66%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	70948 MIPS +129%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	57795 MIPS +86%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	44404 MIPS +43%
Average of class Convertible (24505 - 72400, n=58, last 2 years)	42163 MIPS +36%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	37289 MIPS +20%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	31010 MIPS
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (30689 - 31010, n=2)	30850 MIPS -1%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	6600 MIPS +47%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	5921 MIPS +32%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	5359 MIPS +19%
Average of class Convertible (3946 - 6493, n=58, last 2 years)	5223 MIPS +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	4652 MIPS +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4498 - 4561, n=2)	4530 MIPS +1%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	4498 MIPS

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	19.6 fps +326%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	16.5 fps +259%
Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 20.1, n=60, last 2 years)	11 fps +139%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6.84 fps +49%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	6.54 fps +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4.6 - 5.26, n=2)	4.93 fps +7%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	4.6 fps

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	62.7 s *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (60.1 - 62.7, n=2)	61.4 s * +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	58.3 s * +7%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	52.5 s * +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	51.9 s * +17%
Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=57, last 2 years)	51.3 s * +18%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	40.4 s * +36%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	0.738 sec * -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (0.728 - 0.741, n=2)	0.735 sec * -1%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	0.728 sec *
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	0.642 sec * +12%
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=57, last 2 years)	0.515 sec * +29%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	0.479 sec * +34%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4052 sec * +44%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1419 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

207 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	95 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	90.1 pt
Average of class Convertible	59.3 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	49.3 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	44.2 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	36.2 pt
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	35.5 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	20723 KRay/s +337%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	15746 KRay/s +232%
Average of class Convertible (468 - 25226, n=61, last 2 years)	9579 KRay/s +102%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	7637 KRay/s +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4739 - 5121, n=2)	4930 KRay/s +4%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	4739 KRay/s
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2184 KRay/s -54%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	87120 Points +497%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	79015 Points +442%
Average of class Convertible (2644 - 106512, n=60, last 2 years)	49380 Points +238%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	14589 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (14528 - 14589, n=2)	14559 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	5687 Points -61%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	5315 Points -64%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	3896 MB/s +78%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	3542 MB/s +62%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2607 MB/s +19%
Average of class Convertible (182 - 4764, n=60, last 2 years)	2313 MB/s +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2191 - 2192, n=2)	2192 MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	2191 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	1668 MB/s -24%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	113464 Points +156%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	95165 Points +115%
Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=60, last 2 years)	69888 Points +58%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	69762 Points +57%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	63513 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (44346 - 48532, n=2)	46439 Points +5%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	44346 Points

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	13143 Points +946%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	10412 Points +729%
Average of class Convertible (659 - 14835, n=60, last 2 years)	6805 Points +442%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2357 Points +88%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	1969 Points +57%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	1256 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1240 - 1256, n=2)	1248 Points -1%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	45793 Points +444%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	38948 Points +363%
Average of class Convertible (1420 - 56839, n=60, last 2 years)	25093 Points +198%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15669 Points +86%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	13050 Points +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (8416 - 9903, n=2)	9160 Points +9%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	8416 Points

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	71745 MB/s +91%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	71089 MB/s +89%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	70017 MB/s +86%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	58675 MB/s +56%
Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=60, last 2 years)	50352 MB/s +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (37646 - 37747, n=2)	37697 MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	37646 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1045 MB/s +119%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	869 MB/s +82%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	802 MB/s +68%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	678 MB/s +42%
Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1088, n=60, last 2 years)	659 MB/s +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (478 - 483, n=2)	481 MB/s +1%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	478 MB/s

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	10812 KRay/s +378%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	8569 KRay/s +279%
Average of class Convertible (254 - 13175, n=60, last 2 years)	5044 KRay/s +123%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	3392 KRay/s +50%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2826 KRay/s +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2262 - 2759, n=2)	2511 KRay/s +11%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	2262 KRay/s

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	43838 MPixel/s +38%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	38707 MPixel/s +21%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	37635 MPixel/s +18%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	36689 MPixel/s +15%
Average of class Convertible (5136 - 52599, n=60, last 2 years)	36170 MPixel/s +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (31867 - 31890, n=2)	31879 MPixel/s 0%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	31867 MPixel/s

系统性能

总而言之，Windows 在 ARM 处理器上运行得非常好，尤其是在使用本地应用程序时，日常使用中不会遇到任何问题。例如，在 IFA 期间，这款可折叠的笔记本电脑就是我们的好伙伴，我们可以完成所有需要做的事情，包括运行 Capture One 和 Adobe Photoshop。即便如此，在购买这款设备之前，你也应该知道它的性能储备是有限的。

除了本地应用程序，您可能还会遇到一些兼容性问题。在最好的情况下，X86 应用程序可以被模拟，这只是以牺牲少量性能为代价。不过，也有可能因为缺少相应的驱动程序，应用程序根本无法启动或配件无法使用。您应该事先了解所需的应用程序是否有 ARM 版本。高通公司本身有一个信息网站微软发表了一篇博客文章博客文章，强调了 ARM 系统带来的限制。

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total

CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1983 Points +69%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash	1944 Points +65%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1566 Points +33%
Average of class Convertible (310 - 1912, n=57, last 2 years)	1482 Points +26%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1443 Points +23%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1216 Points +3%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1175 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1168 - 1175, n=2)	1172 Points 0%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1889 Points +70%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash	1797 Points +62%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1520 Points +37%
Average of class Convertible (389 - 1790, n=57, last 2 years)	1449 Points +31%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1375 Points +24%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1124 Points +1%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1108 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1100 - 1108, n=2)	1104 Points 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash	2350 Points +83%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2195 Points +71%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1726 Points +34%
Average of class Convertible (252 - 2183, n=57, last 2 years)	1590 Points +24%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1529 Points +19%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1381 Points +7%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1287 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1269 - 1287, n=2)	1278 Points -1%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1689 Points +58%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1401 Points +31%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash	1393 Points +30%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1280 Points +20%
Average of class Convertible (295 - 1868, n=57, last 2 years)	1266 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1068 - 1087, n=2)	1078 Points +1%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1068 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1052 Points -1%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	435 Points +7%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash	430 Points +6%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	407 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (405 - 407, n=2)	406 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	399 Points -2%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	302 Points -26%
Average of class Convertible (84.2 - 407, n=60, last 2 years)	268 Points -34%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash	315 Points +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	295 Points +4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	287 Points +1%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	283 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (280 - 283, n=2)	282 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	256 Points -10%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	248 Points -12%
Average of class Convertible (49.4 - 283, n=58, last 2 years)	227 Points -20%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Convertible (468 - 2676, n=61, last 2 years)	647 ms * -38%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	515 ms * -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (468 - 481, n=2)	474 ms * -1%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	467.8 ms *
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	465 ms * +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	460.8 ms * +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	400.3 ms * +14%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash	318.8 ms * +32%

* ... smaller is better

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67615 MB/s +10%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	65911 MB/s +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	63769 MB/s +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	63007 MB/s +3%
Average of class Convertible (16353 - 95631, n=60, last 2 years)	62628 MB/s +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (61342 - 62430, n=2)	61886 MB/s +1%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	61342 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	125359 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (124236 - 125359, n=2)	124798 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	124555 MB/s -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	119818 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	62942 MB/s -50%
Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=60, last 2 years)	57744 MB/s -54%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	49784 MB/s -60%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	91878 MB/s +99%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	75529 MB/s +64%
Average of class Convertible (10177 - 93451, n=60, last 2 years)	63881 MB/s +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (46128 - 46472, n=2)	46300 MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	46128 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	45097 MB/s -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	44742 MB/s -3%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	121.4 ns * -1541%
Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=60, last 2 years)	112.4 ns * -1419%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	85.7 ns * -1058%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	7.5 ns * -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	7.4 ns * -0%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	7.4 ns *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (7 - 7.4, n=2)	7.2 ns * +3%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

我们无法在骁龙平板电脑上进行延迟测试。不过，我们在播放 4K YouTube 视频时发现了一些个别的掉帧现象。

存储设备

PZ13 内置 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘，容量为 1 TB，用户在首次启动设备后可自由使用 900 GB。西部数据 SN740 的传输速率约为 5 GB/s，性能非常出色，即使在长时间负载的情况下，我们也只测得了相对较小的波动，日常使用中应该不会注意到。更多固态硬盘基准测试这里。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5064 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4909 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 502 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 536 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 73 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 131.3 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 694 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1209 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	90.6 pt
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	86.4 pt
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	82.4 pt
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	78.3 pt
Average of class Convertible	68.3 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	65.5 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	65 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (2970 - 3628, n=7)	3231 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2974 (2950.9^min - 2974.18^max) MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2970 (2920.32^min - 2969.92^max) MB/s
Average of class Convertible (321 - 4416, n=59, last 2 years)	2646 MB/s -11%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2592 (2555.51^min - 2591.66^max) MB/s -13%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2526 (2409.21^min - 2526.44^max) MB/s -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	2451 (2391.59^min - 2451.07^max) MB/s -17%
seq write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3439 (3052.4^min - 3438.7^max) MB/s +16%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	3338 (3184.11^min - 3338.46^max) MB/s +13%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (2521 - 4121, n=7)	3280 MB/s +11%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2967 (2890.09^min - 2966.57^max) MB/s
Average of class Convertible (195.5 - 4824, n=59, last 2 years)	2403 MB/s -19%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2249 (2116.03^min - 2249.31^max) MB/s -24%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1920 (1853.32^min - 1920.15^max) MB/s -35%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	5265 (3457.79^min - 5264.86^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (5076 - 5265, n=7)	5187 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	5134 (4615.2^min - 5134.25^max) MB/s -2%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4789 (4345.83^min - 4788.71^max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Convertible (399 - 7152, n=59, last 2 years)	4472 MB/s -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	3660 (3274.24^min - 3659.74^max) MB/s -30%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	3634 (3212.91^min - 3633.94^max) MB/s -31%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	4606 (4534.67^min - 4606.41^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (4130 - 4824, n=7)	4548 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	4130 (4116.86^min - 4129.71^max) MB/s -10%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3678 (3661^min - 3677.55^max) MB/s -20%
Average of class Convertible (215 - 5667, n=59, last 2 years)	3211 MB/s -30%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2986 (2958.24^min - 2986.34^max) MB/s -35%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	2435 (2059.61^min - 2434.58^max) MB/s -47%
4k q1 t1 read
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	76.3 (74.19^min - 76.34^max) MB/s +27%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (43.6 - 83.7, n=7)	67.9 MB/s +13%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	65.4 (64.45^min - 65.38^max) MB/s +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	63.3 (61.13^min - 63.27^max) MB/s +5%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	60.1 (56.17^min - 60.13^max) MB/s
Average of class Convertible (11.3 - 90.3, n=59, last 2 years)	57.8 MB/s -4%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	54.6 (52.91^min - 54.56^max) MB/s -9%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	174.3 (169.24^min - 174.29^max) MB/s +43%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (85.6 - 301, n=7)	163.5 MB/s +34%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	161.1 (150.7^min - 161.06^max) MB/s +32%
Average of class Convertible (48.4 - 398, n=59, last 2 years)	142.3 MB/s +16%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	122.3 (116.84^min - 122.33^max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	122 (120.81^min - 121.95^max) MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	114.6 (108.47^min - 114.63^max) MB/s -6%
4k q32 t16 read
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1379 (1342.61^min - 1379.15^max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1069 (1020.98^min - 1069.39^max) MB/s -22%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (601 - 2300, n=7)	1029 MB/s -25%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1003 (972.92^min - 1003.23^max) MB/s -27%
Average of class Convertible (156.4 - 3881, n=59, last 2 years)	998 MB/s -28%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	978 (957.59^min - 977.78^max) MB/s -29%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	791 (762.43^min - 791.09^max) MB/s -43%
4k q32 t16 write
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (277 - 2441, n=7)	769 MB/s +8%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	712 (667.41^min - 711.88^max) MB/s
Average of class Convertible (99.8 - 3537, n=59, last 2 years)	696 MB/s -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	642 (635.59^min - 642.04^max) MB/s -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	631 (619.64^min - 630.94^max) MB/s -11%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	517 (507.17^min - 517.15^max) MB/s -27%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	413 (402.24^min - 412.89^max) MB/s -42%

AS SSD
Score Total
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	5023 Points +70%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4762 Points +61%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (2963 - 6460, n=7)	4344 Points +47%
Average of class Convertible (394 - 8028, n=58, last 2 years)	3667 Points +24%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2963 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	2764 Points -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2242 Points -24%
Score Read
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1468 Points +68%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (872 - 2658, n=7)	1403 Points +61%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1315 Points +51%
Average of class Convertible (186 - 3137, n=58, last 2 years)	1253 Points +44%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	872 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	820 Points -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	764 Points -12%
Score Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2861 Points +70%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2829 Points +68%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (1686 - 2898, n=7)	2274 Points +35%
Average of class Convertible (116 - 3348, n=58, last 2 years)	1832 Points +9%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1686 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1638 Points -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1015 Points -40%
Seq Read
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	4220 MB/s +7%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (3913 - 4496, n=7)	4164 MB/s +6%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	3926 MB/s
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3771 MB/s -4%
Average of class Convertible (473 - 5684, n=58, last 2 years)	3506 MB/s -11%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2885 MB/s -27%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	2763 MB/s -30%
Seq Write
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (1863 - 4258, n=7)	2887 MB/s +3%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2807 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2754 MB/s -2%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2439 MB/s -13%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2127 MB/s -24%
Average of class Convertible (180 - 5229, n=58, last 2 years)	2068 MB/s -26%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1791 MB/s -36%
4K Read
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	69.2 MB/s +35%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	67.4 MB/s +32%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (40.3 - 76.3, n=7)	58.9 MB/s +15%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	57.4 MB/s +12%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	54.3 MB/s +6%
Average of class Convertible (11.4 - 82.4, n=58, last 2 years)	54 MB/s +6%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	51.1 MB/s
4K Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	238 MB/s +24%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (156.2 - 258, n=7)	202 MB/s +5%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	201 MB/s +4%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	192.7 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	184 MB/s -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	183.5 MB/s -5%
Average of class Convertible (41.5 - 347, n=58, last 2 years)	162.5 MB/s -16%
4K-64 Read
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	978 MB/s +129%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (428 - 2132, n=7)	928 MB/s +117%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	884 MB/s +107%
Average of class Convertible (126.9 - 2508, n=58, last 2 years)	850 MB/s +99%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	463 MB/s +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	430 MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	428 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2384 MB/s +97%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2347 MB/s +94%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (1212 - 2388, n=7)	1783 MB/s +47%
Average of class Convertible (38.4 - 2855, n=58, last 2 years)	1463 MB/s +21%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1275 MB/s +5%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1212 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	618 MB/s -49%
Access Time Read
Average of class Convertible (0.021 - 0.244, n=58, last 2 years)	0.08769 ms * -237%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (0.026 - 0.104, n=7)	0.06357 ms * -145%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.055 ms * -112%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	0.046 ms * -77%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	0.041 ms * -58%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	0.035 ms * -35%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	0.026 ms *
Access Time Write
Average of class Convertible (0.017 - 0.561, n=58, last 2 years)	0.09697 ms * -410%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (0.016 - 0.071, n=7)	0.03414 ms * -80%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	0.031 ms * -63%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	0.03 ms * -58%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.022 ms * -16%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	0.019 ms *
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	0.018 ms * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4969 (4404.65-5258.61)

图形卡 - Adreno X1-45

新的骁龙 X Plus 8 核机型配备了性能较弱的 Adreno X1-45有两种性能级别（2.1 或 1.7 TFLOPS）可供选择。小型 X1P-42-100 安装的是速度较慢的 1.7 TFLOPS 版本，GPU 最高时钟频率为 1.107 GHz。总体而言，其性能比 Adreno X1-85 的 3.8 TFLOPS 差 50%，在 GPU 基准测试中，X1-45 排在最后一位。比较一下：iPad iPad Pro 13的 M4 GPU 在 Steel Nomad Light 测试中（在两个系统上均可本机运行）的速度快三倍多。

那么，这对日常使用意味着什么呢？其实，一开始并没有什么意义，因为它的性能仍然足以完成基本任务，包括播放高分辨率视频。由于兼容性问题，骁龙 X Elite 芯片的游戏性能本来就是个问题，而新的骁龙 X Plus 和 X1-45 GPU 则进一步加剧了这一情况。即使是低细节的老游戏，我们有时也会遇到帧数明显下降的问题，因此在这款设备上玩游戏毫无乐趣可言。许多游戏根本无法启动。

至少，在长时间负载和电池模式下，它的图形性能仍能保持稳定。更多 GPU 基准测试请访问移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表。

3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 6.2

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	28200 Points +599%
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	12345 Points +206%
Average of class Convertible (471 - 40768, n=59, last 2 years)	8479 Points +110%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	6429 Points +59%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6311 Points +57%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (4032 - 4033, n=2)	4033 Points 0%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	4032 Points

3DMark
Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)	3583 Points +212%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	2187 Points +91%
Average of class Convertible (1148 - 2851, n=4, last 2 years)	2042 Points +78%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	2012 Points +75%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	1148 Points
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1147 - 1148, n=2)	1148 Points 0%
Steel Nomad Score
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	524 Points +125%
Average of class Convertible (233 - 674, n=5, last 2 years)	496 Points +113%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	477 Points +105%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	233 Points
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (232 - 233, n=2)	233 Points 0%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	20533 Points +456%
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	7818 Points +112%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	6410 Points +74%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6294 Points +71%
Average of class Convertible (365 - 29684, n=60, last 2 years)	6255 Points +69%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (3691 - 3792, n=2)	3742 Points +1%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	3691 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	7655 Points +773%
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2780 Points +217%
Average of class Convertible (94 - 11749, n=59, last 2 years)	2195 Points +150%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	1715 Points +96%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1700 Points +94%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	877 Points
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (873 - 877, n=2)	875 Points 0%

Geekbench 6.2 - GPU OpenCL
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	27982 Points +180%
Average of class Convertible (9991 - 119558, n=31, last 2 years)	27889 Points +179%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	20185 Points +102%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	19879 Points +99%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (9991 - 9994, n=2)	9993 Points 0%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	9991 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		4440 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3612 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		985 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		233 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		1148 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100	1055 Seconds *
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (807 - 1055, n=2)	931 Seconds * +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	751 Seconds * +29%
Average of class Convertible (326 - 1253, n=58, last 2 years)	660 Seconds * +37%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	637 Seconds * +40%
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	383 Seconds * +64%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	340 Seconds * +68%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Convertible (23 - 55, n=4, last 2 years)	33.5 Seconds *
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	28 Seconds *

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Convertible (37 - 142, n=5, last 2 years)	75.4 Seconds *
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	53 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	100 pt
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	40.9 pt
Average of class Convertible	30.2 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	28.5 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ ^-1! Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	24.9 pt
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	20.4 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	77 fps +600%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	30.4 (15.4^min, 16.7^P0.1, 18.9^P1) fps +176%
Average of class Convertible (8.5 - 123.3, n=55, last 2 years)	20.9 fps +90%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	20 fps +82%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	18.8 fps +71%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	11 fps

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	76.9 (3.91^min, 47.6^P1) fps +438%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	26.5 (2.34^min, 18.5^P1) fps +85%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	20.8 (2.32^min, 12.3^P1) fps +45%
Average of class Convertible (6.06 - 114.3, n=48, last 2 years)	16.9 fps +18%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	14.3 (2.57^min, 9.43^P1) fps

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	75.1 fps +673%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 fps +179%
Average of class Convertible (8.88 - 107.1, n=57, last 2 years)	21.5 fps +121%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15.7 fps +62%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15.4 fps +58%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	9.72 fps

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	139.3 (121.8^min) fps +191%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	73.2 (64.1^min) fps +53%
Average of class Convertible (5.4 - 158.3, n=60, last 2 years)	59.3 fps +24%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	51.6 (40.6^min) fps +8%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	47.8 (38.5^min) fps
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	45 (33.5^min) fps -6%

Strange Brigade - 1280x720 lowest AF:1
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	385 (58.3^min, 292^P1) fps +358%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	161.1 (88.7^min, 135.4^P1) fps +92%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	140 fps +67%
Average of class Convertible (67 - 407, n=54, last 2 years)	117.4 fps +40%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	84 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	68 fps -19%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS: Ø7.2 (6.69-7.45)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	94.4	88	33.4	14.3
The Witcher 3 (2015)	65	39	22	11
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	85	67.1	55	47.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	37.8	15	9.72
Far Cry 5 (2018)	37	21	19	17
Strange Brigade (2018)	84
F1 22 (2022)	33.1	36.6	23.3	16.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	14.4	11.2	9.57	8.2

排放物 - 风扇偶尔发出噪音

噪音排放

ProArt PZ13 的噪音排放让我们感到有些惊讶--尤其是与 Vivobook S 15 相比。 Vivobook S 15相比，使用相同骁龙处理器（但功耗限制更高）的 Vivobook S 15 的噪音更大。虽然 Vivobook 在标准模式下也非常安静，但 PZ13 的噪音明显更大，而且风扇启动得更快。在满载情况下，风扇转速也会频繁波动，因此华硕确实应该在这方面做出改进。如果希望尽可能安静，则应使用耳语模式，该模式下平板电脑的性能仍足以应付日常任务。我们的测试设备听不到任何其他电子噪音。

风扇简介	赛博朋克 2077	压力测试
Whisper	26.7 dB(A)	30.6 dB(A)
标准	35.1 dB(A)	40 dB(A)
性能	43.1 dB(A)	44.8 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle		23.7 / 23.7 / 23.7 dB(A)
Load		26.7 / 40 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.7 dB(A)

	Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
Noise		-16%	-11%	-4%	-10%
off / environment *	23.7	25.4 -7%	23.6 -0%	23.8 -0%	24 -1%
Idle Minimum *	23.7	26.7 -13%	23.6 -0%	23.8 -0%	24 -1%
Idle Average *	23.7	31.6 -33%	23.6 -0%	23.8 -0%	24 -1%
Idle Maximum *	23.7	32.5 -37%	25.2 -6%	23.8 -0%	24 -1%
Load Average *	26.7	32.7 -22%	39 -46%	23.8 11%	38.61 -45%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	35.1		39 -11%	44.7 -27%
Load Maximum *	40	34 15%	44.8 -12%	44.7 -12%	43.59 -9%
Witcher 3 ultra *		33.2			41.24

* ... smaller is better

温度

在低负载情况下，设备的表面温度完全不成问题。在较高负荷下，这取决于你如何使用设备。如果只单独使用平板电脑，我们在金属背面测得的 43 °C温度可能会让人有点不舒服，如果你真的把骁龙处理器推向极限的话。不过，只要装上后盖，就不会有问题了。

在综合 CPU/GPU 负载的压力测试中，GPU 受到了青睐，但其频率为 970 MHz，无法全速工作。八个处理器内核的平均工作频率约为 2.1 GHz。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


43.7 °C	43.3 °C	40.4 °C
41.4 °C	39.9 °C	36.5 °C
36.4 °C	36.5 °C	36.2 °C

Maximum: 43.7 °C
Average: 39.4 °C


40.3 °C	43.9 °C	43.5 °C
37 °C	40.9 °C	41.6 °C
34.2 °C	36.3 °C	37 °C

Maximum: 43.9 °C
Average: 39.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 37.3 °C | Room Temperature 22.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


27.4 °C	27.5 °C	27.1 °C
27.6 °C	27.6 °C	27.2 °C
29.6 °C	31.9 °C	20.6 °C

Maximum: 31.9 °C
Average: 27.4 °C


27.1 °C	27.5 °C	27.6 °C
26.8 °C	27.4 °C	27.6 °C
26.8 °C	27 °C	27.4 °C

Maximum: 27.6 °C
Average: 27.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26.4 °C | Room Temperature 22.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


41.2 °C	41 °C	38.3 °C
39.9 °C	39.5 °C	34.4 °C
34.4 °C	34 °C	32.3 °C

Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 37.2 °C


38.7 °C	41.3 °C	42.3 °C
35 °C	39.9 °C	40.1 °C
31.9 °C	35.7 °C	35.5 °C

Maximum: 42.3 °C
Average: 37.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 34.7 °C | Room Temperature 22.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the class Convertible.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.5 °C / 97.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-8.4 °C / -15.1 F).

	Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Heat		-21%	3%	7%	13%	1%
Maximum Upper Side *	43.7	50.5 -16%	43.1 1%	43.9 -0%	36.7 16%	42 4%
Maximum Bottom *	43.9	54.8 -25%	46.3 -5%	44.9 -2%	35.7 19%	47 -7%
Idle Upper Side *	31.9	34.9 -9%	27.5 14%	26.2 18%	27.3 14%	27 15%
Idle Bottom *	27.6	36.3 -32%	26.8 3%	24.6 11%	26.4 4%	30 -9%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

ProArt PZ13 有两个扬声器，整体音质一般。语音非常容易理解，但在播放音乐或电影时，声音缺乏重点。Surface Pro 在这方面的表现略胜一筹，而Apple iPad Pro 13 在这方面明显领先。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Minisforum V3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 超长电池运行时间

耗电量

PZ13 只需要很少的功率，尤其是在空闲模式下--我们注意到最大功率为 6.1 瓦。不过，与 Surface Pro（拥有亮度更高的 120-Hz OLED）相比，这绝不是创纪录的数值。在负载情况下，它的功率曾一度达到 60 瓦，考虑到骁龙 X Plus 的体积，这已经是相当大的功率了。在接下来的压力测试过程中，耗电量在 30-40 瓦之间波动。因此，附带的 65 瓦电源在体积上已经足够。不过，0.94 瓦的待机功耗还是太高了。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.44 / 0.94 Watt
Idle	3.5 / 5.3 / 6.1 Watt
Load	14.9 / 59.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3"	Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0, IPS, 2560x1600, 14"	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB, OLED, 2880x1920, 13"	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ, IPS, 2880x1920, 13"	Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 1 TB NAND Flash, Tandem OLED, 2752x2064, 13"	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4"	Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Average of class Convertible
Power Consumption		-179%	-20%	-40%	36%	-209%	-6%	-83%
Idle Minimum *	3.5	10.1 -189%	2.8 20%	1.9 46%	1.94 45%	8.5 -143%	4.15 ?(3.5 - 4.8, n=2) -19%	5.38 ?(1.8 - 16.6, n=59, last 2 years) -54%
Idle Average *	5.3	16.9 -219%	3.9 26%	9.2 -74%	5.02 5%	12.4 -134%	5.6 ?(5.3 - 5.9, n=2) -6%	8.32 ?(4.2 - 20.7, n=59, last 2 years) -57%
Idle Maximum *	6.1	20.6 -238%	4.9 20%	9.5 -56%	5.05 17%	13.3 -118%	6.55 ?(6.1 - 7, n=2) -7%	11.1 ?(4.5 - 33.9, n=59, last 2 years) -82%
Load Average *	14.9	51.7 -247%	34.3 -130%	29.6 -99%	8.71 42%	93 -524%	15 ?(14.9 - 15.1, n=2) -1%	46.1 ?(14.6 - 87, n=59, last 2 years) -209%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	23.1		35.8 -55%	39.5 -71%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	23.5		36 -53%	37.4 -59%
Load Maximum *	59.9	61.2 -2%	41.2 31%	40.7 32%	16.93 72%	135 -125%	57.4 ?(54.9 - 59.9, n=2) 4%	66.4 ?(24.9 - 120.8, n=59, last 2 years) -11%
Witcher 3 ultra *		55.4				87.8

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø37.7 (28.1-59.9)

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.9 (4.55-6.58)

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø23.1 (20-33.7)

Power consumption with external monitor

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø52.8 (22-62.6)

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø14.5 (13.5-21.9)

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø35.6 (24.8-60.7)

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.79 (5.42-6.69)

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø23.5 (22.4-26.6)

运行时间

华硕为这款平板电脑配备了 70 Wh 的电池，与 Snapdragon SoC 相结合，确保了良好的运行时间，几乎超越了所有竞争对手。在 150 cd/m²（相当于测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 66%）的 WLAN 测试中，我们测得的运行时间刚刚超过 14 小时。在这方面，对比设备都无法跟上，但它们的电池容量也明显较低。在全亮度状态下，无线局域网测试仍可持续近 9.5 小时，视频播放可持续近 18.5 小时。在满负荷状态下，可使用约 2.5 小时。在设备开启的情况下，充满电需要 127 分钟，大约一小时后可恢复 80% 的电量。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		14h 11min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		9h 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 25min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 29min

	Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 70 Wh	Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, 50.82 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 53 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 47 Wh	Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 38.99 Wh	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 56 Wh	Average of class Convertible
Battery Runtime		-40%	-22%	-29%	38%	-66%	-27%
H.264	1105		953 -14%	841 -24%	1174 6%	284 -74%	776 ?(540 - 1105, n=13, last 2 years) -30%
WiFi v1.3	851	352 -59%	665 -22%	662 -22%	752 -12%	298 -65%	592 ?(329 - 981, n=60, last 2 years) -30%
Load	149	119 -20%	104 -30%	89 -40%	326 119%	61 -59%	115.8 ?(42 - 219, n=45, last 2 years) -22%
Witcher 3 ultra						50	90 ?(last 2 years)

Pros

+ 优质稳定的外壳

+ 色彩准确的高分辨率 OLED 触摸屏

+ 2x USB-C 4.0 和 Wi-Fi 7

+ 快速读卡器

+ 良好的主观性能

+ 运行时间长

+ 交货包括键盘盖和触控笔

Cons

- PWM 闪烁

- 无维护选项

- OLED 仅在 60 Hz 时闪烁

- 风扇活动相对较多

- 无 5G 选项

结论：户外敞篷车，动力强劲，但没有 5G 功能

与两款笔记本电脑同类产品一样，新款 ProArt PZ13 的销售对象也是相当小的一群人。这是一款带有可拆卸键盘的平板电脑，主要面向那些希望随时随地编辑媒体的创意用户。坚固的外壳以及对外界环境（温度、水、灰尘等）的更好保护使其成为可能。与此同时，摄影师还可以期待快速、功能齐全的 SD 读卡器、支持手写笔的高分辨率 OLED 屏幕、sRGB/P3 的精确色彩配置文件以及两个 USB-C 端口（允许连接外置硬盘）。

我们并不完全清楚采用新的骁龙 X Plus 处理器的决定，因为它的多核性能和 GPU 性能比新的骁龙 X Elite 芯片弱很多，而后者在微软 Surface Pro 上运行得非常好。微软 Surface Pro为例。它的性能足以胜任简单的任务，但如果考虑到其 1099.99 美元的最高售价，那么最慢的高通处理器就不完全适合这款产品了。同样遗憾的是，这款平板电脑没有 5G 版本，而 5G 版本本应特别适合这一概念。

新款华硕 ProArt PZ13 是一款有趣的可转换平板电脑，适合那些希望在恶劣条件下工作的创意用户。虽然它的运行时间很棒，但新的骁龙 X Plus 的性能储备有限，而且没有使用 5G 的选项。

还有一点值得批评的是该平板电脑的显示屏，因为它和其他两款 ProArt 型号一样，也只采用了频率为 60Hz 的 OLED 面板。同时，光线表面看起来有点颗粒感，而且设备在安装了两个盖子后更厚更重了。不过，如果你想利用它更强的耐用性，那么你应该可以接受这种妥协。它的运行时间总体上很不错，这主要归功于它的大容量电池。我们也不太喜欢它没有任何维护选项。此外，由于骁龙芯片较小，平板电脑的风扇启动相对较快。

我们已经提到了它的价格，1099.99 美元的价格确实很高。但如果把它的价格与 OLED 版 Surface Pro 的价格相比，再考虑到这款平板电脑还附带了一个不错的键盘盖和一支触控笔，那么它的高价就又显得合理了一些。

iPad Apple iPad Pro 13配备 M4 处理器，性能更强，显示屏更好（可选雾面显示屏）。此外，这款Apple 平板电脑还有保护套可供选择，让你在户外也能很好地使用它。不过，最大的优势是你还可以选择 5G 调制解调器。当然，与 Windows 相比，iPadOS 有更多限制，但Apple 设备上仍有大量优秀的应用程序。公平地说，你也必须承认，iPad 的价格与 Windows 完全不同：1 TB 版本起价 1899 美元，不含 5G 或任何配件。

价格和供应情况

新款 ProArt PZ13 可通过百思买购买，售价1,099.99 美元。

请注意：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息请点击此处.

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 - 2024-09-11 09/11/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

84 / 98 → 86%

Keyboard

79%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

64 / 74 → 86%

Weight

77 / 20-75 → 100%

Battery

90%

Display

83%

Games Performance

26 / 65 → 39%

Application Performance

74 / 92 → 81%

Temperature

87%

Noise

90%

Audio

82 / 91 → 90%

Camera

64 / 75 → 86%

Average

61%

85%

Convertible - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
80.8%

Repairability
0%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 33.9%

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 306 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 434458 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 ProArt PZ13 评测--配备骁龙 X Plus 的耐用 OLED 可折叠手机

Andreas Osthoff, 2024-09-14 (Update: 2024-09-14)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparison
Lenovo B50-30 (min) N2815, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	49
...
Dell Inspiron 16 7635 2-in-1 R5 7530U, Vega 7	1415
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	1418
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	1419
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	1419
Dell Latitude 13 7330 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1420
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng i7-1255U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	1422
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1428
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	15842

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	4438
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	4438
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	4440
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	4440
Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE i7-8565U, GeForce MX250	4449
Geekom Mini IT12 i5-12450H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	4450
Minisforum Venus Series UN1245 i5-12450H, UHD Graphics 64EUs	4461
...
(max) R7 7800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	72163

华硕 ProArt PZ13 评测--配备骁龙 X Plus 的耐用 OLED 可折叠手机

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 通过 IP52 认证的平板电脑

尺寸比较

连接性 - USB 4 和 Wi-Fi 7

SD 读卡器

交流

网络摄像头

维护

输入设备 - 行程为 1.35 毫米的键盘

显示屏 - 3K OLED，60 Hz

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - Snapdragon X Plus

测试条件

处理器 - X1P-42-100

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡 - Adreno X1-45

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

排放物 - 风扇偶尔发出噪音

噪音排放

温度

发言人

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 audio analysis

Minisforum V3 audio analysis

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ audio analysis

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 audio analysis

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V audio analysis

电源管理 - 超长电池运行时间

耗电量

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

运行时间

Pros

Cons

结论：户外敞篷车，动力强劲，但没有 5G 功能

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison